← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Chief Justice Marston Gibson

My Lord,

On this day, September 01, 2011, the day of your installation as Chief Justice, we congratulate you on your swearing in and we thank you sincerely for having accepted the appointment.

The timely administration and delivery of justice in Barbados has long been one of the primary concerns with the BU family. For too long, the Charter of Magna Carta (that celebrates its 800th Anniversary in 2015) has been flouted and ignored in Barbados. A Charter that clearly postulates that justice delayed is justice denied.

We have read your comments courtesy of the Fourth Estate and we ourselves have been linked to the New York Times blog in connection with your appointment. We are hopeful and optimistic that you are exactly the right man for the job of re-delivering Justice to Barbados.

However, my lord, we also realise that this is not a task in which you can succeed on your own. You will require the support and cooperation of the judiciary, the Bar, the Registry and the People. Last, but by no means least, Government will have to provide you with the tools to do the job, whether it be budget, the setting up of Royal Commissions to deal with unsatisfactory, incompetent or recalcitrant judges or, most importantly, having the courage and resolve to provide its backing (without political or personal bi-partisanship) to support your efforts. We urge everyone, especially Government (by both and whichever political parties) to give you full support.

Clearly we do not have enough judges and hopefully the budget will be forthcoming for you to be enabled to appoint more, in consultation with those who need to consult. Hopefully, these will include senior and experienced members of the Bar, rather than those elevated from the very systems that at are fault for the dearth of justice. The fact that the government has taken the decision to select you from outside the inner ring has created a huge expectation in the minds of long suffering Bajans.

We note the decision of the English Court of Appeal reported in The Times Law Reports of August 30, 2011 which upholds an appeal from a decision of an English QC sitting as a deputy judge. We hope that the inexcusable backlog of cases (some not heard and some part-heard and all several years delayed) before the Barbados courts may benefit from Barbados’ silks giving of their time and undoubted experience and competence in the same manner. We would not like to think that QC has been totally debased to solely a political thank you, but means superior competence. “Qualified Competence”, if you like.

We hope that judges will consult with unconflicted senior counsel and produce decisions that do not take years and are delivered in keeping with the guidelines of 90 days or, for complicated cases, six months.

We hope that most motions can be disposed of in the Canadian manner, by telephone conference calls between judge and counsel, or summarily, with judges having the full knowledge of the Rules that they now so patently lack.

We have long advocated ADR and negotiated settlements and we hope that you will encourage this and establish a working basis on which such can be entered into.

We hope that the chaotic “scheduling” of the Registry can be resolved and that, if that means appointing a new Registrar, we will not find the present incumbent or unsatisfactory future incumbents elevated to the judiciary as a reward for the chaos like that which now reigns. That would be a slap in the face for the taxpayers. The buck has to stop somewhere and it ought to stop with the department head under whose reign (and we use the word “reign” advisedly) court files are lost, scheduling of hearings of cases either ignored or made a mess of and systems and equipment provided by the taxpayers either ignored or simply not used, to the extreme detriment and, in some cases, hardship (both personal and financial) of Bajans and overseas investors who have applied to our Courts for justice.

We also hope that you will find the means at your disposal to speed up the criminal justice system, so that no longer do accused persons remain on remand for unconscionable periods of time.

Again, my lord, our congratulations and thanks and support –and prayers* – to and for you as you embark on your task.  And may the CCJ never have cause to ridicule our Justice System under your watch.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. Let us welcome our 13th Chief Justice.


  2. Welcome Chief Justice.

    It has not been an easy walk getting here…

    And it will not be an easy walk getting further.

    But we here in Barbados (or, at least, most of us) trust you have it in you to get the job done.

    Do the Job well….


  3. Kinda Weird… Today I observed the results of a man falling off his bike, and hitting his head on the ground.

    I called 911. “I need an ambulance immediately. This is a true emergency” says I.

    Oh, says the 911 operator, if you need an ambulance, then you need to call 511.

    I then called 511 and reported my situation. And only a few minutes later the ambulance attended.

    My deepest of respects to the Barbados Ambulance Service, who do their job very well.


  4. Welcome Home Sir Marston Gibson.
    And welcome to BU; there’s never a dull moment here.
    Welcome.


  5. Seems to me that it is convenient to forget that the Chief Justice was NOT selected by an independent authority … and that any political administration that is prepared to take extreme steps to fill a post with a specific person is easily accused of finally “getting THEIR man”.

    What I am waiting for is an “effective” administrator, even if he is NOT independent. What we seem to be getting is a Rhode Scholar …

    Sorry, no enthusiasm here (but 18 year old Tennis soon-to-be Super Star Sloan Stevens just drop lashes in an Israeli … ja ja)


  6. Royal Commission? What’s that? Deputy Judge? Who wrote this, David?


  7. @Jack

    You need to do some research.


  8. Welcome to the Chief Justice

    The right man, in the right place, at the right time


  9. Welcome home Mr.Justice Gibson; we have been mystified and disturbed by the rather tortuous process you have had to endure before being seated.

    All the same, we wish you a successful tenure. May you be engulfed by divine wisdom as you deliberate, and may your legal training, knowledge and experience set you apart.

    Your distinguished predecessor was remarkably proficient on the saxophone, and I note interestingly, that you are an above average troubadour, employing both the Guitar Chord and the Vocal Cord. I therefore look forward with grand anticipation to hearing your “Encore Performance” of “No Woman No Cry”


  10. Marston Gibson, Chief Justice
    Many congratulations on your appointment.

    Dare I say it, because a man of your eminence and experience does not need advice from little Yardbroom. However, first study the terrain on which you tread before you place your foot. Note everything and say little. The task before you is great and so are the expectations, but you are the man, remember haste has its pitfalls, so move slowly with sure intent.

    Good luck.


  11. Welcome, my lord.

    @Yardbroom. You are right, except that YOUR input is always of value, whether it is agreed with or not.


  12. How can you advocate for transparency and accountability, yet support this appointment? No wonder senior CLICO managers chaired statutory boards while the company defied regulators; and even worse one now heads the FSA.


  13. @Enuff

    We don’t need the Opposition being divisive on this appointment. Let us welcome Gibson, an eminently qualified Barbadian back home.


  14. @David | September 2, 2011 at 5:34 AM | I agree. This is not the time for political posturing. I believe that anyone who indulges in political posturing on this occasion does so to the detriment of ordinary Bajans who look to the Chief Justice to provide a greatly revitalised justice system for the benefit of the country. When Simmons was appoined, although we did not quite like it, we hoped for the best and gave him our support. We ought to do no less for Chief Justice Gibson – in fact, we ought to do more, as Simmons inherited a working system, while Gibson has inherited a mess that is openly ridiculed by the CCJ and around the world. In the extremely unlikely event that the Chief proves unequal to the task, we can deal with it then. But this, one day into Mr Gibson’s tenure, is most certainly not the time. The enormity of his task is frightening and it takes a man with the emotional fibre of a lion to have even contemplated it, far less taken it on. Encouragement and support are needed now, not discouragement and political hogwash.


  15. As a proud Barbadian I am particularly pleased that an accomplished Barbadian is returning home to contribute to his country.

    He will do his job and he will do it exceptionally well.


  16. @ DAVID

    Whoever wrote this PIECE* – if the CJ* is watching from the sidelines – he will be very impressed with the TONE, TEXTURE & TEMERITY of the call to act contra pacem regis…

    WELL-THOUGHT OUT, WELL-WRITTEN, WELL-DELIVERED!!!


  17. Can you tell me where I should start my “research”, David?


  18. A LESS FAVORABLE SLANT ON THIS STORY IS BEING CARRIED BY THE “other” BLOG* TO THE FOLLOWING EFFECT:

    “IF Marston Gibson is our new Chief Justice, his appointment will be as tainted as the appointment of David Simmons. The law was changed for one man: Marston Gibson. The law was proved to be worth nothing. It was a minor inconvenience standing in the way of a government that wanted to do what it wanted to do. So, the DLP government changed the law…”

    “Tomorrow it will be some other law that stands in the way of what the government in power wants to do, and another law will be changed in the middle of the night with no public debate or societal discourse on why the law is the way it is in the first place…”

    ..from BFP’s July 8, 2011 article re-printed below

    “Inconvenient Barbados Law Changed For One Man…”

    Breaking news: August 18, 2011 1:17am

    http://barbadosfreepress.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/american-marston-gibson-announces-he-is-new-barbados-chief-justice/


  19. @Jack Spratt

    The Internet can be your Oyster!


  20. @TB

    As proud Barbadians the BU household has adjudged (no pun at all intended) that now is the time to close ranks on this issue and support the new CJ.

    Perhaps those who would think otherwise need to remove clouded blinkers or check their citizenship papers.

    One of the downsides to a democracy is that all views have a place.


  21. I am amused at “amused’s” post above. Motes in one’s eyes in spades.


  22. @ DAVID

    “One of the downsides to a democracy is that all views have a place…”

    I agree!!!

    WISH WE COULD GET OTHERS TO SEE IT THAT WAY AS WELL…

    BUT IS BARBADOSFREEPRESS WRONG IN IT’S SUMMATION OF THE FACTS?

    We pride ourselves on seeing the glass as always “HALF-FULL” because we rather err on the side of OPTIMISM* – but as not to be labeled “IGNORANT” of the possible realities – “WILL ANYTHING REALLY CHANGE BASED ON THE HISTORY OF OUR POLITICS AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM?”

    And what about our illustrious “RHODES SCHOLAR”?

    Who was Cecile Rhodes and how has the Rhodes Scholarships been used in the past and to what ends?

    What is the legacy behind the Rhodes fortune and the setting up of Rhodesia?

    What about the The Rhodes-Milner Group of (1891) and Rhodes’ association with THE ROTHSCHILDS?

    How is our current CJ influenced by the “INDOCTRINATIONS”* of the past given that we know little about his philosophies and to what ends will his TENURE (given that he plans to be there for the next 13 years) serve?

    It’s all well and good to wish a “brother” the very best and I am the 1st to say that “I AM MY BROTHER’S KEEPER” – but I am also intricately aware that all that glitters is not gold and until I have dug deep enough for myself into a matter to get to the real AGENDA* – I accept things ONLY*** on surface value waiting for that infamous slip up that will reveal the real TRUTH*…

    So time will tell what’s really up and whether our POLITICIANS* and leaders REALLY* have our interests at heart – or whether it is just another exercise in smoke and mirrors based on intrigue to undermine as was stated in your piece our rights, as was enshrined in that charter called – “MAGNA CARTA”…


  23. David:
    I can join you in welcoming the new CJ, but in a system in which CJs are selected and not elected, don’t you think it would have been a better exercise, although we may have had the same result, with an open system which allowed all the aspirants to the office to be questioned by seasoned as well as interested parties who are attempting to improve our justice system. I well remember the nomination of Bourke for the US Supreme Court; at the end of that process I knew what he stood for and also had an insight to what philosophy was driving the late senator Kennedy. We know that we are operating under an archaic system in Barbados, but those who know that they can manipulated it continue with their monkey business. What does Mr. Gibson stand for. Does anyone know. What is his take on social issues, political interference. What was he exactly in New York? Was he a Judge sitting on the Federal bench or was he a judge’s clerk. How did that experience prepare him for this job. I am asking these questions for I honestly, apart from the media spin, do not know why he was selected for the job. Like Terrence Blackett, I am not blown over by the Rhodes Scholar thing. They are normally “selected” too.


  24. @ LEMUEL

    Please forgive my assault on the “WALLS” of the establishment but there are few of us who will use the necessary battering-rams to breach the almost impenetrable outer walls of political sophistry erected as bastions against all enemies both foreign and domestic who seek to peer behind these enclosures to see what alchemy is going on…

    You know the shenanigans our leaders employ… They refuse to volunteer information… If any ground is gained in the PUBLIC SQUARE* it is usually done based on virulent contestation, SOCIAL UNREST* and oftentimes “ANARCHY”… And only when “FORCED” to concede do they put their hands up in disgust!!!

    In our country as in all other developed and developing countries, the preservation of “FAMILY” wealth and the STATUS QUO* is the J.O.B. of the “ELITES” who own the bulk of the financial and asset resources – as well as those who manage those assets and wealth for that 1% of the population…

    Barbados is no different….

    If the POST* of CJ carries clout (as some would argue) – then the question is this:

    “WHOSE INTERESTS WILL THE “CJ” BE LOOKING AFTER?

    “WILL HE BE HIS OWN MAN OR A LACKEY OF THE ESTABLISHMENT “elite” IN MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO?”

    “FINALLY, WILL THERE BE THE “legal” WILL AS WELL AS THE FREEDOM FROM “political” INTERFERENCE FOR HIM TO DO HIS JOB EFFECTIVELY – FREE FROM BIAS, DISCRIMINATION “and/or FAVOR TO ANOTHER BUT THE LAW?”


  25. HAVE A READ:

    The Fabians, the Round Table, and the Rhodes Scholars…

    http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=FinalWarning&C=5.1#Rhodes


  26. “My lord”!! ?? ok then


  27. TM Blackett; Thanks for the reference to the Fabians, the round table and the Rhodes scholars. Very interesting information.

    It would be even more interesting if someone could trace the trends of employment and leadership of the Barbadian, Caribbean and even Black Rhodes scholars of the last several decades. Have they been Captains of Government and Industry? Have they been clearly associated with Rhodes’ original agenda in setting up the trust? What is the pre-scholarship profile of Rhodes Scholars – Here as well as in the first world? Could there have been an agenda to expose these scholars to teachings that would likely ensure their committment to maintaining the dominance of the British and the Americans into the forseeable future? Are they Arab or Chinese or Japanese Rhodes Scholars? Could we see some strategic master plan being put in place in ensuring the current incumbent’s ascendancy into the position, given that Government had to change the law to ensure it?

    I hope the new CJ lives up to BU’s expectations. Its early days yet but his first comments reported on VOB yesterday suggests that he is on the right track.


  28. Not suprisingly, this post interests me.

    @David. Spratt epitomizes the attitude of some in the Judicial System and an alarmingly high number of politicians. One might say that he is a “political jurist” – or connected or related to one. He would seek to treat Bajans as if they were mushrooms – kept in the dark and fed on shit. Therefore, the Internet would not be his oyster, but a potentially fatal threat.

    @TMB. Wherefore the reference to “contra pacem regis”, which means “against the King’s peace”? I have reread the post and frankly your point, if you have one, completely escapes me. Or might it be that you believe that the use of Latin, whether appropriate or not, will give readers the impression of great scholarship? So precisely what, in the way of tort, do you find contra pacem regis in what BU has written? Please elucidate, as I, for one, am befogged and befuddled as to what in hell you are talking about. As for your question about Cecil Rhodes, I refer you to David’s answer to Spratt and suggest you go on the Internet and do a little reading – or have you already read and are now trying to make yet another impenetrable point?

    Also @TMB. Since the issue with ROK added to the disclosure that BFP’s agenda is for sale for $(type unspecified)650 a week, which will ensure, not only the agenda you want to put forward is prominently and aggressively posted and detractors “moderated”. But it will also pay for the release of internet details to the “money” of anyone who comments (which, if the commenters get lucky, may be enshrined in public documents before the Canadian courts). So why would anyone wish to take seriously anything BFP posts? If I recall accurately (and I do, because I just did a search on BFP) BFP lauded the statement of Prime Minister Thompson when he indicated that the next CJ would be chosen from outside. But now it seems to have a problem that his word was kept. Why and wherefore this contradiction? Has someone stumped up the $650 per week for this u turn? Or is it simply that BU scooped all news outlets on this particular story? Or is it simply that BU and family have very largely supported the appointment of Chief Justice Gibson?


  29. To Terrence:
    I have no difficulty with your position, but at times I believe the tone is too combative. That is not saying that there are times when the combative tone will be needed. But continue to do what your are doing with measured calmness and logic. It works every time.Take a leaf from Bushie; not his beliefs though for I am still waiting on them.


  30. @ David

    Based on your response, once a person is eminently qualified and living overseas’ accountability and transparency in governance no longer applies to the appointment of such person to a senior position in our country.
    My comment had nothing to do with divisive opposition politics just plain old truth, consistency and good governance as I have nothing against the CJ. However, accountability and transparency are not meant to be selectively applied.
    May I remind you that Marston was denied like Jesus by members of the government in both houses of Parliament.


  31. Welcome Mr C.J you’re elevation to the post was marred by controversy, however, that is now water under the bridge. I hope you can adjust and settle in quite swiftly as many are looking for you to fail, even though I was not please with your appointment I WISH YOU WELL..
    I realise you, like me, love Bob Marley’s music, just keep this song in the back of your mind “man to man is so unjust, you don’t know who to trust.Your worst enemy can be your best friend, and your best friend your worst enenmy. Some with eat with, then behind sue sue on you.” Some of those who are now shouting your praises can be the first ones to cry you down. Just do your best SIR.


  32. @ Lemuel

    “I have no difficulty with your position, but at times I believe the tone is too combative…”

    ROFL!!!!

    Could it be that is matter of perspective?

    Combatants are those who incite violence and mayhem at the end of a tank and a gun (governments, politicians, military & subversionists)…

    The tools of my warfare are NOT* carnal my dear brother!!!

    I have come to learn that the “PEN” is mightier than a sword…

    So “TRUTH” needs no BARRISTER* or defense counsel!!!

    @ Amused

    I apologize that some things are not readily discernible with the naked eye but please try to keep up dear boy!!!

    My current research work looking at medieval Europe from the 1100’s to 1300’s continues to unearth fascinating little pearls which point forward to how our system of jurisprudence, politics and economic has emerged…

    In the 11th century, common domestic English laws were enforced in manorial, shire and hundred courts…

    Now when Duke William II of Normandy invaded England around 1066 – killing King Harold – the Norman rule of law began to emerge from the King’s Council (Curia Regis)…

    The King’s Council who held political sway carried out the [3] functions of state -EXECUTIVE, JUDICIAL & LEGISLATIVE dealing with the important cases in which the King had a direct interest, namely breaches of the King’s Peace as this had direct bearing on the social cohesion of the realm – for any form if “INSURRECTION” had to be met with swift justice…

    The courts however would ultimately split from the King’s Council – forming separate Common Law courts…

    For example, the “Court of Exchequer” ([HMRC + the Chancellor’s office] as it is TODAY* in Britain) dealt with collecting revenues – becoming a distinct political entity during the reign of King Henry I (1100 -1135)…

    Now the “Court of Common Pleas” (as it was called then – but Civil Court today) remained in Westminster Hall to handle matters of dispute between aggrieved individuals persons…

    The King’s Council on the other hand would travel around the realm officiating in legal matters of importance – with the separation of the Court of King’s Bench occurring around 1230…

    However, in 1195, due to a Royal Proclamation emerged JP’s (or magistrates) creating the well known – (‘Knights of the Peace’ – a copied version of the Knights Templar’s officially endorsed by the Catholic Church around 1129) to assist the Sheriff in enforcing the common law….These JP’s were later given judicial functions dealing with minor crimes…

    So as you can see, the “King’s Peace” was a vital component in the consolidation and maintenance of SOVEREIGN* power and any breach of the “King’s” Peace would not be tolerated…

    From this you can glean whatever “SYMBOLISM” you think I am trying to infer – and if still not clear – then I apologize AGAIN!!!


  33. @ checkit-out

    You are most welcome BRUV*…

    Your questions are PIVOTAL* in keeping our politicians, leaders and OFFICIALS* accountable…

    This is not the AGE* for anyone to be asleep at the wheel – far less giving FOLKS* a FREE* ride without no limits or constraints upon them…

    THE DEVIL IS A LIAR!!!

    I gotta’ believe those days are long gone man!!!


  34. @TMB. Interesting and totally impenetrable reasoning. Have you considered medication? You ought to, you know. I have no intention of giving you a lecture on what the phrase contra pacem regis means or its relevance in law, but I suggest you look it up in connection with Trespass vi et armis. There, you have another bit of Latin for you to conjure with. Do me the favour of NOT explaining what it means as I already know, as does most of the readership of BU who, believe it or not, are extremely bright and well read. Once you have looked it up, you may, but only just MAY, realise why I am startled by your suggestion that BU has urged the new CJ to commit acts injurious to the property of someone else by means of force? For that is what you have stated, not suggested, STATED. In which case, perhaps you would be so kind as to point me to precisely what part of the BU report you allege that this is suggested in. Oh, sorry if you are being subtle and this subtly has escaped me – it must be because I am too literal – or should that be literate. In which case, for the sake of myself and my similarly bemused brethren, please explain to us very slowly (we would not wish to miss a single pearl of wisdom that drops from your keyboard) precisely what you mean.


  35. Let us continue to share the views, even when we disagree, so that those who lurk may become wise to what ordinary folk maybe thinking.


  36. Enuff, Truthman
    I kno how you’re hurting inside wid jellusy but it is what it is so welcome our new C.J.

    “No woman, no cry”.
    Men a nuff wish dat dem could sing dah song causen de woman in dem life is jus torture dem mornin, nooon n nite n eff dah in good enuff, rob dem blind, treat dem like dogs, den ride offf into de nite wid one a dem friends.
    So you could hush ya ass.
    No woman no cry shoiteeeeee.
    stupseeeeeeeee


  37. @TMB. Interesting and totally impenetrable reasoning. Have you considered medication?

    Amused yuh mekking muh laff out reel loud. My dogs have more intelligence than TMB.


  38. @Bonny Peppa | September 2, 2011 at 5:41 PM |
    “Enuff, Truthman, I kno how you’re hurting inside wid jellusy but it is what it is so welcome our new C.J.”

    Don’t curse me Bonny Pepper. I have sincerely welcomed the new C.J. and I have wished him well. A confusing two year delay by the government, including a a change of the law in the dead of night to qualify him, does makes him a special gentleman! Much hype has been generated and much is expected of him, in what will clearly be a challenging position.

    I only mentioned that “No Woman No Cry’ song because it appears to be a favourite of Mr. Gibson’s. He reportedly created quite a thrill when he sang and accompanied himself on guitar at his New York farewell party.
    So why are you getting so hot under the collar?


  39. Incidentally, BONNY PEPPA, The C.J may very well have to sing that song in his court room to several of the young ladies around here, who have been complaining that the “dead beat” dads won’t pay child support.

    I doubt that Freundel will honour that promise to pay tax-payer funded child support, so don’t be surprised if the CJ sings the song regularly. That may be the only solace. lol lol lol


  40. @Aunt Bonny Peppa… Have you considered the possibility that you’re not helping your own cause here?

    Yes. Of course you have.

  41. Sunshine Sunny Shine Avatar
    Sunshine Sunny Shine

    I really hope that new appointed CJ is not puppet on a political string. He comes highly certified with an impressive track record. Now he is in Barbados where the practice of law is not so well practice on an ethical and moral platform. I hope th CJ keeps his integrity intact and not be influence by the big bullies with monies. Mr. Chief Justice to whom much is given much is expected please deliver so that we can dispel the notion held that justice targets the no bodies and respects the some bodies


  42. @TB

    Despite your view our hope is if we had the opportunity to peer into the Marston’s heart its colour is streaked with ‘blue yellah’, Rhodes Scholar not withstanding.


  43. Truthman
    Doan pay me na mind. I doan even pay myself na mind sumtimez. I is jus a instigata.
    By de way, dah got ‘dead-beat moms, too. I kno a few.

    Dear Nevu Halsall
    Man leff ma nah. leh dis sleepin dog lie. I kno dat I promise ya sumting but ya gottta be patient. De line long but I gun get ta you……………………….. evenshully.


  44. Bonny

    You notice that the new CJ came unencumered with a wife.I know you say you like them dark,tall and thin.

    I think you may give him a pass on 2 out of 3 – wha yuh think huh?


  45. @Bonny Peppa | September 2, 2011 at 8:01 PM |
    “Truthman Doan pay me na mind. I doan even pay myself na mind sumtimez. I is jus a instigata. By de way, dah got ‘dead-beat moms, too. I kno a few.”

    One thing I realise ’bout you “My Bonny lies over the ocean”, is that I have this uncanny ability to pull out your teeth, and calm you right down! You always coming back to me oh so mushy mushy and apologetic! lol lol

    But tell me, cause you ain’t unpick yuh teet when I mention it! You think that your favorite boy Freundel talking through the two corners of he mouth, or will he really mek the tax payers pay child support for “dead beat dads.” You really think he gun keep that promise?


  46. Quoting Truthman Barton “I doubt that Freundel will honour that promise to pay tax-payer funded child support”

    I hope that Freundel made no such promise, and that if he did he will quickly renege on his promise. If the government supports the children of deadbeat dads we will surely get more deadbeat dads.


  47. @Random Thoughts | September 2, 2011 at 11:16 PM. Agree completely. Look at the state that the UK is in on just this issue, with its government trying to backtrack and change an entire culture of thought. Billions of pounds every year spent, with single women deliberately having children solely for the purpose of collecting benefits and free housing. In Barbados, it would be such a drain on our resources and economy that I frankly doubt if we could afford or survive it. It also raises the issue of children supporting parents, rather than parents supporting children. A sad state of affairs when children are seen as being akin to cash crops.


  48. Now that we have DNA testing we NEED TO ATTACH EVERY CHILD TO ITS BIOLOGICAL FATHER. And if he won’t voluntarily support his child then we NEED to attach his wages. If he is dead, chronically ill, so disabled that he cannot work, or temporarily unemployed then the state can chip in a little something.

    But my philosophy is that he who enjoyed the screw should support the little bastard. He didn’t call on me to help him enjoy his fcuk, so why should he call on my tax money to support his lil’ bastard?

    If Freundel is planning this the DLP will NOT get my vote.


  49. In a socialist system what the welfare system has stoked a mentality of entitlement.


  50. David, why can’t you simply say that you don’t know instead of pompasetting with non sequiturs such as “the internet is your oyster?” I have done the research and I can find nothing of the need for a ROYAL Commission to remove a judge in independent barbados and I am unable to find any concept of a Deputy Judge in our Law. Someone must have found a few pages out torn from a book on English Legal Systems! Hmmmm..

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading