← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

BU is pleased to post documents for public viewing which detail a Renewable Energy (RE) and Energy Efficient (EE) rollout strategy by the government of Barbados. The government of Barbados secured a 110 million US dollar loan from the IDB in September 2010 amortized over 25 years to ready Barbados for RE and other EE approaches. The strategy is for Barbados to fully transform its energy sector over a 20 year period by drastically reducing dependence on fossil energy generation. BU is disappointed the content of the documents listed below is not being vociferously championed to sensitize Barbadians at this time, a concern noted in the research listed.

Below is an excerpt from the IDB Smart Document:

RE Implementation Potential. As shown in figure 1, the implementation of utility scale wind farms (10 Megawatt (MW) or more), biomass cogeneration (20MW), waste to energy (13.5 MW) and SWH are economically and commercially viable (when compared to the avoided cost of diesel, line marked in red in figure 1); therefore, these technologies are all recommended and may operate below the avoided cost of fossil fuel. Even today some of the PV technology would be commercially viable in Barbados and it is expected for the rest of the PV applications costs to drop in the future. The overall RE potential that could be deployed is estimated at 28.9% of the total installed capacity of electricity generation (in terms of MW).

See full documents which outline a sustainable energy framework for Barbados:


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. yes i know. I am showing what the fourth estate has. Maybe the minister went announce approval before send across the documents.?


  2. For now will stick with Redjet FB update 🙂


  3. if we did that they would have been flying to T&T and jam all now :).


  4. @David: “The last BU update on REDjet came from their FB page.

    Don’t take this the wrong way BU.David. But you are clearly comfortable being the bitch of REDjet by way of Facebook?

    Might you think for yourself?

    Or is that asking too much?


  5. The late Pro Oliver Headley did a study which showed that Barbados because of it location had the highest radiance hitting terra firma in the world. It was about $33 per sq metre in cost saving if we embrace solar energy.


  6. Cheryl;

    is that study by Prof headley published on the web? If so, there are probably many people here, including me, who would like to see it.


  7. The ordinary Bajan here is the looser.BL&P is laughing all the way to the Bank. I wonder if this report was commisioned by BL&P and sanctioned by the non-elected in office, responsible for advising the elected. In 5,10 yrs. time Bajans should be able reflect on ‘what if!’ I believe more can be done at this time to increase the renewable fuel mixture for Barbados to become more INDEPENDENT on fossil fuel. Now is the time; tomorrow will be too late.The above article should have been looking to at atleast 50% plus ‘renewables’ in this climate.
    The IDB is more concerned about a safe return on its investment.I can see BL&P’s fingerprint all over this document.BL&P has a right in safegaurding its interest; the government,s is to safeguard the people’s. The failure here is the government; the loosers are the people. An Island saturated with sunshine for the best part of the year, with tried and tested equipment readily available. This brings me now to ask if the government present and past have got an alternative when they have allowed only one provider of electricity to dominate for so long? The winners in this are the lenders and BL&P.A post above stated how Germany with a fraction of the sunshine is investing so much in solar.We are aware most of Europe and the Middle East are heavy investors; China also. I,ve just spoken to a friend in Australia and it’s amazing what the government is doing in terms of solar. Canada which is a major exporter of fossil fuel is also excelling in solar PV.

    .


  8. […] the 45 million loan has been fully disbursed to government they have even start paying back the loan already.. http://www.iadb.org/en/projects/project,1303.html.id=BA-L1022. The iadb also get interesting reports. It matter of fact the biggest waster of water on the island the bwa main systems. anywhere from 40-60% of all water pumped is wasted thru the main system. There is 50 million us loan that the government applied fro since 2009 that is sitting doing nothing. they ever start doing repayments but the main loan continues to sit there with no action. http://www.iadb.org/en/projects/project,1303.html.id=BA-L1015. the water rates could be said to have been increased by 60% to cover this leaked. Imagine the reduction in bwa expense is they didn’t have to pump an extra 40-60% of water. It has been reported that bwa is the biggest consumer of electricity on the island. i am sure the goverment would love to reduce that cost. Read more on A Renewable Energy […]


  9. I am looking for the Budget debate to set the stage for the unveiling of a bipartisan approach to what is clearly a National crisis where energy is concerned.

    I fully expect members of both the parties to have been briefed and prepared to speak on the need to apply the funds for the good of the country.

    I hope they do not overdo it though because it may cause people to lose interest.

    I think that may explain the the silence.

    I may have been too cynical.

    Bush Tea has that effect.

    I say the parties are waiting to roll out Government’s program on national TV so that maximum effect can be had and that is why everything has been so hush hush up to now.


  10. We could have been developing this technology a long time ago. I remember calling the UWI about 6-7 years ago and asking about solar technology for the home. I asked why hasn’t the government pushed this technology further. I was told that they know why and that since they were investors in the BL&P they might not want to hurt their investment.


  11. As a country how do we measure progress?

    One of the measuring sticks should be sustainability.


  12. @BU
    “BU is disappointed the content of the documents listed below is not being vociferously championed to sensitize Barbadians at this time, a concern noted in the research listed.”

    They do it all the time on the most critical issues – both parties. Classic BLP example, CSME and CARIFORUM and for both parties, CARICOM.


  13. Professor Oliver St. Clair Headley was a person of boundless
    enthusiasm and intense curiosity – characteristics which served him well as a
    researcher and when combined with his ready humour, commanded attention
    in his lecture hall and classroom. He felt he had a particular responsibility to
    his students, both under- and post-graduate, in the quality of his teaching and
    in regularly scheduling time for them no matter how busy he might have been.
    Oliver joined the staff at the St. Augustine campus of the University of the
    West Indies (UWISA) in October 1967, after completing a Ph.D. degree in
    Inorganic Chemistry at University College, London. His was a questioning,
    exploratory approach to most problems and this attitude fuelled his desire to
    engage in meaningful research.

    The sophisticated instruments needed for his
    research in Inorganic Chemistry were at the time not available at St.
    Augustine, nor did it seem that they would be in the foreseeable future. Oliver
    saw himself as having two choices – he would say “either I go back to the cold
    or I take up research in some other area of interest”. On a hot Whit-Monday
    1969 while talking to Basil Springer about a latent interest in solar energy
    and his puzzlement at the fact that so little attention was paid to research in
    this area in countries such as ours, the realization dawned that he had found
    his additional other research area.

    It seems incredible now to recall that at the time, the phrase ‘solar energy’ had
    little meaning to most persons even academics, and the question “Solar who?
    What’s that? Most often followed a declaration of his new research interest.
    This changed completely over the next decade as the oil crisis of the seventies
    and the burgeoning interest in alternative energy sources meant that even the
    primary school student was blithely talking about solar energy.

    His early research spanned two aspects of solar thermal – solar distillation
    and solar heating, and then expanded to include post-harvest applications in
    seed, crop and timber drying. Some timber drying installations combined 2
    solar with other energy sources such as biomass. His emphasis was on designs
    that substantially improved functional efficiency. At first he avoided
    photovoltaics, having concerns about their efficiency and price but decades
    later his work included the use of photovoltaic installations. He was attracted
    to Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC), but reluctantly gave up the idea
    when preliminary studies seemed to indicate that it was not suited to this
    environment – a finding he questioned.

    It was always a feature of Oliver’s work in alternative energy that he freely
    shared the results of his research with any individual or community group
    that requested it and would benefit from the applications e.g. stills for schools,
    driers of various kinds for farmers; he was also willing to travel throughout
    the Caribbean and Central America and work with farmers building units for
    their use.


  14. @Matt: “Professor Oliver St. Clair Headley … was attracted to Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC)…

    Professor Headley was onto something.

    Lay a pipe down into the ocean; as deep as it can go. Place a pump at the shore.

    You will then be able to pump water much cooler than the ambient air temperature.

    Just in case it isn’t yet clear, the generation of power is a function of how much temperature differential you can expose your working fluid to.


  15. Taken from Kofi’s FB page.
    Barbados Renewable Energy Scenario – by Oliver Headley
    Abstract


    Renewable energy has had a long history in Barbados. After sugar was introduced to the island in the middle of the seventeenth century, the windmill soon followed, and at the height of their popularity they were five hundred and fifty five of them at sugar plantations across the island. Sugar cane bagasse was used as the fuel to concentrate the juice and produce sugar. Several hundred multi-bladed windmills, Afanmills@, were used to pump water, but most of these have been dismantled. At the moment, the main renewable energy sources are sugar cane bagasse and solar water heaters which contribute about 15% of the island’s primary energy supply. Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are being set up and currently about 37,000 watts peak (Wp) are in operation. Solar crop dryers and solar stills for producing distilled water are also employed. The government of Barbados would like to have renewable energy contribute 40% of the island’s primary energy by 2010. Projects under consideration include a 60 megawatt (MW) cogeneration plant to burn bagasse and fossil fuel, a 10MW waste combustion plant, 16MW in wind farms, 3MW of ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) plant, 2MW in distributed photovoltaic systems, and probably 0.5MW in wave power.
    http://www.terryally.com/library/oheadleyrenewable.html


  16. @David et al…

    Don’t you find it somewhat interesting that the only experiment in modern wind turbines here in Barbados was cut down?

    In the past this land had many windmills…

    Why don’t we now?


  17. @Chris

    There is a lot about Barbados’ reluctance throughout the years to diversify our energy supply.

    It is interesting to note Minister responsible for energy issuing an announcement on the pilot spoken to in social media exposed on Sunday.

    Let us keep on the god fight.


  18. @BU.David: “There is a lot about Barbados’ reluctance throughout the years to diversify our energy supply.

    We can do many things.

    Taking control of our own future is one of them.


  19. Colin Hudson once told me he estimated the horse power generated by those old windmills was equivalent to a lawn mower, about 3.75hp.

    1hp = 735 -750 watts.

    Thus, less than the 5kW household solar system we looked at.

    There were 500 plus windmills and crop lasted a lot longer.

    Our output of sugar today is about what it was at the end of slavery of the order of 30,000 tons, even with all the technology available.

    Or peak was over 200,000 tons in 1957 and 1967.

    Steam made that possible.

    The conversion from wind to steam started in the mid 1800’s and really got going at the end of the 19th century. The market demanded dry sugar. Centrifuges were required and the power to run them came from steam.

    Some plantations continued with wind but eventually central factories did all the grinding. Wind was still being used at least up to the 1930’s I seem to remember being told.

    Steam gave us sugar output and sugar output gave us the sugar terminal and of course the Deep Water Harbour.

    The sugar factories once started were marvels of self sufficiency in both water to produce the steam (extracted from cane) and fuel (bagasse) to fire the boilers to produce the steam.

    We really are a shadow of what we once were.


  20. @John: “We really are a shadow of what we once were.

    Yes, we are.

    And Colin Hudson was correct.

    We can still be excellent.

    If we want to be.


  21. @David

    Thank you very much for bringing these documents to public attention. They have been a great help to me in seeing what is going on in the RE industry in Barbados. Barbados will be on perfect track if more emphasis is also placed on water efficiency, energy efficient building practices and the use of information technology for more efficient processes. Thanks again…I am hoping to get myself back into the industry in Barbados very soon.

    @Chris H

    OTEC is a very interesting technology but in terms of efficiency it is very poor and very few places can actually exploit it viably, which is the main reason for its relative technological immaturity. Using deep sea cold water for air conditioning is by far more efficient thermodynamically, though as the report suggests it would require large investment and significant planning.

    While we shift to a more sustainable energy system we have to remember that every conversion causes losses so avoiding conversions is key. Sunlight should be used for for lighting, heat for heating (or cooling), mechanical energy to move stuff (water pumping etc.) and energies converted to electricity when it is necessary (to run appliances, electronic devices, lighting at night etc.)


  22. @RE Engineer: “…we have to remember that every conversion causes losses so avoiding conversions is key.

    I will keep that in mind…


  23. @RE Engineer

    Good to see you around.

    You need to thank BU family and friends for the sharing info.


  24. @RE Engineer… As only a few of us will get the above joke…

    Might we now talk seriously about how to extract work from the differential between the heat of a panel on a roof-top, and a heat sink?


  25. Last night I was reading for the first time some comments on BU in mid 2008 on RE and Barbados’ seeming inability to take meaningful action on and meaningfully develop this area. The comments were mainly from Keith Headley, Oliver Headley’s son, ably assisted by David and a few others. It was amazing that the discourse on the topic is almost at the same stage today except that we now have the IDB project funded and little effort by Government to publicise it. There has been little development on the ground since then.

    It seems that what we now need is a new RE champion in the mould of Oliver Headley. His son is extremely knowledgeable in the area but I’m not certain where he is these days and it is unclear if he could fit the bill. Another champion could be James Husbands, another one could be Roland Clarke, another could be whoever is heading up the CERMES project at Cave Hill (If it still exists in the form that it took in Oliver Headley’s time), another one could be a politician.

    I still have that vision of Solar PV off-grid systems being on as many homes as there are now with solar water heaters and of numerous grid tied PV systems populating the roofs and lawns of a vast number of government and private sector businesses and of vastly increased utilisation by real entrepreneurs of other solar, wind, wave and such technologies throughout Barbados far in excess of the 29% utilization target aimed at by the IDB project. But nothing will happen without someone leading the fight.

    I think that Government has to give some thought to setting up an extremely high-level post of Energy Czar and giving him/her all the power and financing necessary to push this thing; mash corns; lock horns successfully with the Minister of Finance, if necessary, all with the blessings of a powerful, proactive Prime Minister.

    These parlous times demand no less.


  26. @Christopher H

    Such a system is possible of course, though efficiency is again a major drawback. For a temperature difference of 67 C (95 C Heat Source and 28 C Heat Sink) then maximum theoretical efficiency is about 18%. One could use a system similar to OTEC which would employ a Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) engine which is similar to a steam cycle but with a more volatile fluid (i.e has a lower boiling point than water), you could employ thermoelectric converters (TECs) which convert temperature differences directly to electricity and there are Stirling engines that convert thermal differences to mechanical energy which can be converted to electricity. Of all the above the Stirling engine would be the most efficient and you could possibly get (as an educated guess) 8 – 10% thermal to electricity efficiency out of it with the aforementioned temperature difference while the TEC and ORC would give you about 3 to 5% efficiency at absolute best. This doesn’t include the inefficiency of whatever panel you use to capture heat on the rooftop. With solar PV systems technology giving overall efficiencies around 12 – 15%, that is why they have been preferred, not to mention the zero maintenance and tremendous longevity of the systems. Thermal systems are much better for providing services such as heating and cooling, at least when it comes to domestic and commercial systems.

    @checkit-out

    I totally agree with you, I have been in the RE sector since 2001, and not too much has happened since then but I am happy to see that at least more things have been going and committees etc have been formed and more projects being worked on. It has been a long uphill battle for persons like Williams Hinds and James Husbands and the like. The major issue has been/is usually lack of tangible funds to really push the sector and the relatively short memories of the public. In the 70s (I wasn’t even born yet but I have heard and read that) during the oil crisis there was a push in RE and efficiency, that died in a few years, then in the 90s it happened again and it died yet again. Then in 2008 when oil prices peaked it was then pushed to the forefront and then it died down in 2009 and part of 2010, now prices are yet again on the rise it is in the forefront again. Hopefully now that funds are in place some real progress can be had. Barbados has a tremendous amount of talent and I think a lot of it is wasted by bringing in a lot of outside ‘help’ who just make projections and proposals then leave. Persons with passion and vision are needed to make these things a reality by being involved at every single step. I am right now a PhD candidate in the very area of sustainable energy and I have been studying and working in the sector for about a decade now and I doubt I am the only young Barbadian who is doing so. However, other countries are far more interested in ‘exploiting’ my knowledge than my own birthplace. And let’s face it, without serious government assistance and support not much can be done in the sector. Like all other nations we are very much locked into our current infrastructure and usage habits, so an overnight change is improbable. So as you said someone needs to be given the reigns to push all the way.

    @BU family and friends
    Thanks for the info.


  27. I have some research from Prof Oliver Headley and it clearly shows we are being bulled by persons who fail to make a difference in our energy policy. Is it not strange that BWA the biggest Customer is not seeking to use alternative energy in the form of Wind Turbines of PV?


  28. Why is corruption so evident in Barbados and Bajans are so quiet. Who will get the contracts from the IADB $110 million loan for the EE and RE projects? Mr LeIighton Waterman the Project Manager is too soft and laid back, to lead the move to RE and EE. I am thinking this may be deliberately for leakage via steel to take place as he will be ball less.


  29. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY FRAMEWORK. A $1 million loan from the Inter-American Development Bank, acting as the Implementing Agency for the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) is for payments for goods, and consulting services to be procured under the project “Implementing Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Projects under the Sustainable Energy Framework for Barbados.” Refer to: Project No. GRT/FM-12075-BA. Bid BA-X1001. Deadline not specified.Details: Permanent Secretary (Energy). Ministry of Finance, Investments,

    Telecommunication and Energy. Attn: Mr. Leighton Waterman. Special Projects Unit. Ground Floor, ICB Bldg. Roebuck St. Bridgetown, Barbados. Tel: (246) 435-2211, 435-0660. Fax: (246) 429-7489. E-mail: sefbarbados@yahoo.co.uk

  30. Nuff talk Fruendal Avatar
    Nuff talk Fruendal

    ATTENTION: Mr Leighton Waterman, Project Manager,
    Sustainable Energy Frameworks,
    Office of the Prime Minister, Barbados,

    We know you are shy but can you update the public on whats happening in EE and RE from the Sustainable Energy in the Caribbean Conference held in May 2011? We you be more communicative than when you were at the Caricom Secretariat.

    Here is a reminder of your last job.
    CARIBBEAN RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FACILITY (CRETAF)

    CRETAF is funded by the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) in amount of approximately US$1.3 million. It provides assistance for renewable energy project preparation in the form of grant financing to countries participating in the Caribbean Renewable Energy Development Programme (CREDP).

    CRETAF assists developers with project preparation from the initial through the final stages of bankable project documents. This includes:

    Pre feasibility studies
    Full feasibility studies
    Grid stability studies
    Resource Assessment
    Environmental Impact Assessment
    Target: Strong project concepts that require further study before going to capital markets for funding

    Terms: Funds are provided as grants for financing eligible RE projects from CREDP participating countries. It is the objective of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Secretariat to ensure that as many participating Member States as possible benefit from CRETAF grant assistance. All applications received up to the 17 October 2008 will be pooled, and the most eligible projects from as many participating Member States as possible will be selected for support. After 17 October 2008, eligible projects will be funded on a first come first served basis subject to the availability of funds.

    How to access CRETAF:

    Step 1: Develop an idea for RE Project

    Step 2: Complete the CRETAF Expression of Interest/ Application Form

    Step 3: CREDP will evaluate the project using RETScreen where relevant

    Step 4: Developer needs to fulfill the terms outlined in CRETAF Term Sheet, including obtaining a letter of support from the respective Government

    Step 5: CREDP will follow up with the developer

    Requests for any additional information and/or completed application should be forwarded to:

    Mr. Leighton Waterman
    Senior Project Officer, Energy
    CARICOM Secretariat
    Tel. No.: 592-222-0001-75 ext. 2638
    Fax No.: 592-222-0155
    Email: lwaterman@caricom.org

    Note: The operational modality of CRETAF was revised in June 2008 in keeping with the approach adopted under the CREDP Project Extension


  31. The technology is out there people, are we looking for it?

    MIT Unveils Solar Power System That Doesn’t Need Sunlight
    by Timon Singh, 07/28/11
    filed under: News, Renewable Energy, Solar Power

    A solar energy system that doesn’t require sunlight is almost as bizarre as a tidal power system that doesn’t use water – however that’s exactly what researchers at MIT have cooked up. The team just unveiled a new photovoltaic energy conversion system that can be powered by heat, the sun’s rays, a hydrocarbon fuel, or a decaying radioisotope. The button-sized power generator that can also run three times longer than a lithium-ion battery of the same weight.
    Read more: MIT Unveils Solar Power System That Doesn’t Need Sunlight | Inhabitat – Green Design Will Save the World


  32. @BU.David et al…

    Hey, it’s Saturday morning. Part of Foreday.

    But… Are you *sure* you want to back this particular horse?

    Sounds like bullshit to me.


  33. @Chris

    On what basis do you refute the technology?

    Is this MIT backing the claim?


  34. @David: “On what basis do you refute the technology?

    An understanding of thermal dynamics.

    @David: “Is this MIT backing the claim?

    You tell me.

    You brought the claim forward.


  35. @Chris

    It is too early in the morning.


  36. @David: “It is too early in the morning.

    Please correct me if I am wrong, but did you not bring your above bullshit forward at 0855 hours?

    Just asking….


  37. @Chris

    And your asked on what basis you have labeled the research by a group at MIT bullshite.

    Now be very discrete.


  38. @David…

    Let us please be very explicit…

    The Power out is always less than the Energy in.

    This has already been well established.

    If some at MIT have shown this to be incorrect, then they will have shown Newton and Einstein wrong.

    For some reason, I don’t think they have.

    But I’m happy to be proven wrong.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading