Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

โ† Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Chief Justice Designate Marston Gibson

Todayโ€™s Nation newspaper headline cries, CJ Hitch!

It was back in August BU broke the story – Barbados Government Selects Next Chief Justice From Outside The Inner Ring – of Marston Gibsonโ€™s selection as Chief Justice (CJ) Designate. His appointment was heralded then by Barbados Underground (BU) and we continue to support Gibsonโ€™s selection moreso in light of todayโ€™s Nation report. It is an open secret, endorsed by many who practice law and interact closely with the Judiciary, it is in urgent need of leadership from the top. A hindrance to accomplishing much needed efficiency within the bowels of our judicature has been the inability of recent CJs to make waste of the boys club of lawyers which has throttled the efficiency and effectiveness of Barbadosโ€™ Court System.

The Nation article exposes the move by โ€˜someโ€™ who have hijacked our Judiciary and now feel threatened by the coming of the 13th Chief Justice from outside the inner ring. We ask Barbadians to support Prime Minister Fruendel Stuart who is unfamiliar in the role of kicking butt, one which the late Prime Minister David Thompson performed with some competency as evidenced by his selection of CJ Designate Gibson. It is instructive when former President of the Barbados Bar Association (BBA) Wilfred Abrahams was asked by the local media to comment on Gibsonโ€™s selection he was conditional in his congratulations. He took the opportunity to inform the public that in his opinion suitable home grown candidates were available. On another occasion while on a radio talk show he was heard questioning the non extension of David Simmonsโ€™ term. Perhaps all has been explained with the selection of Wilfred Abrahams to represent the Barbados Labour Party in Christ Church East in the coming general election.

In any event, if there is a โ€˜snaggโ€™ as the Nation report suggests, an amendment of the Act requiring a simple majority can be passed on an urgent basis by the Lower House. BUโ€™s best research confirms such an amendment does not* require a change in the constitution which would necessitate a two thirds majority count. Given the intent by late Prime Minister David Thompson by selecting Gibsonโ€™s from outside the boys club, no doubt Prime Minister Stuart in his former role as AG would have been consulted, Barbadians would not question any precedent set if there is a need to go to parliament to remove any โ€˜snaggโ€™ if there is one.

Here is an opportunity for Prime Minister Fruendel Stuart to demonstrate he will unburden himself from the past and walk a new path regarding how we want our Judiciary to function. The legacy ofย  former Prime Minister Owen Arthur will continue to be troubled by the appointment of former CJ David Simmons. Note that BU is not questioning the reputation of David Simmons. The point has been made that the Judiciary in our system of governance requires it to operate under a separation of powers doctrine. The insensitive and ugly appointment of David Simmons to CJ having not served a โ€˜restโ€™ period after vacating the role of Attorney General has set a dangerous precedent which Barbadians must respond to with a collective shout of โ€˜never againโ€™ in this country. Given Arthurโ€™s recent return as Leader of the Opposition he should be made to promise Barbadians that he will not inject the spectre of politics in future appointments to the bench should he regain the office of Prime Minister.

The importance which the Judiciary has played in Barbados earning the good reputation as a stable jurisdiction cannot be underscored enough but recognizing that we have been struggling to meet the standard of previous years. The need to erase the suggestion ofย  political encroachment by the executive arm behoves Prime Minister Stuart to act hastily to pre-empt possible public uncertainty which may brew as a result of confusion surrounding Marston Gibsonโ€™s appointment.

Against the foregoing BU has it on good authority that the Prime Minister has done his round robin of the senior legal beavers, as his studied approach compels him to do, and he will be making an announcement on the matter shortly.ย  In fact the announcement may come as early as tomorrow. In the announcement he is expected to confirm the appointment of CJ Designate Marston Gibson.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. @Yardbroom: “Perhaps, just perhaps โ€“ when this requirement was drafted โ€“ it was not envisaged that someone of the calibre of Marston Gibson would be Chief Justice of Barbados from the USA…

    I suspect you are correct.

    But the question remains: why do our laws ***forbid*** that possibility?

  2. My Name Is Not Sylvan Avatar
    My Name Is Not Sylvan

    @Amused….

    as is usual when arguing with DLP spin doctors they try to haul all sorts of red herrings across the trail…..

    “You mean to tell me that any member of the Barbados Bar can go to Canada, take a six month course in Canadian procedure and be called to any one of the several law societies, but that some political retards in Barbados are objecting on no sound legal basis at all to the appointment of a Bajan man from a poor, black background who has distinguished himself as lawyer (in two jurisdictions โ€“ England from which we take our common law and the USA from which we adopt many of the legal precedents) and judge in the USA and whose first law degree is Caribbean? I also find it interesting (and Jeff can and has confirmed this) that Marston Gibson has delivered many lectures to law students at Cave Hill. So some idiots are trying to suggest that he is okay to help train local lawyers at Cave Hill, but not to be Chief Justice? ”

    First being called to the bar as a lawyer in Canada (a Commonwealth country) has nothing to do with the legal statute for the elegibility for CJ of Barbados if he hasn’t practiced there.

    Secondly neither the colour or the background of the Gentleman in question has nothing to do with the legal requirement for CJ of Barbados.

    The fact that he has been called to the bar in England and the US is not relevant to the legal requirement for the post of CJ of Barbados.

    That he is eminently qualified in the legal field is not in dispute.

    The legal requirement for the person appointed to the CJ’s position is that they have practiced for 15 years in a Commonwealth jurisdiction.

    Has the gentleman in question done this?

    Yes? No?

    For all the red herrings that you drag across the trail, it is this singular point that is relevant.

    This has less to do with the Jurist in question and more to do with the slapdash way in which this appointment was handled, and once again how in a furious effort to cover up your ineptitude you try to blame someone else (ANYONE else) for your administration’s embarrassing screw up.


  3. @David. My friend, would you not consider equating the Nation/Sun with the word “passionate” is a contradiction in terms? The Nation will be “passionate” about anything the serves the ends of the BLP, because its owners are BLP supporters. And the very moment those self-same owners shift their political allegiances (which they have done frequently in the past out of self-interest), the Nation’s “passion” will change. Interesting, huh! Maybe (but don’t hold your breath) the day will come when the Nation’s owners will stop trying to be the power behind Barbados’ political throne and start reporting the news and, if at all possible, getting it right for once. But I have not seen any airborne pigs lately (well, apart from one Airbourne).


  4. I think this matter is just a proverbial storm in a teapot.
    Government will not allow the CJ designate to be embarrassed and so the legal obstacles will be cleared up before he takes up office.

    However, that it has occurred now says volumes about those whose duty it is to implement such decisions or the obduracy of those who make the decisions in the first place.

    It should not have taken months for the parties concerned to have spotted the apparent stumbling block for Mr. Gibson to have taken up the post. Therefore it must be assumed that it is being dealt with or has been dealt with.


  5. @checkit-out: “Therefore it must be assumed that it is being dealt with or has been dealt with.

    Please correct me if I’m wrong here, but do not changes to the “law” here in Barbados require gazetting to be legal?

    Just asking….


  6. @Chris

    Please advise URL which points to the Barbados Gazette or Hansard for that matter. (Expect to have to duck in anticipation of your response)


  7. @BU.David: “Please advise URL which points to the Barbados Gazette or Hansard for that matter.

    LOL… No need to duck (quack, quack…). We’re all actually in this together.

    To the best of my knowledge, the “Official Gazette” of Barbados is not available on-line to *anyone*.

    And don’t even try to ask for back (read: printed) copies more than a few months (even when you offer money for same).

    Unlike, for example, what is available from Canada or the United Kingdom.

    But, as always, I’m more than happy to be proven wrong.


  8. @ Christopher Halsall | December 13, 2010 at 2:16 PM |
    Of course they do. Did I put a time frame on how long it would take the matter to be dealt with? Does a solution of the matter require a 2/3 rds majority? Can Government push through a matter within days if it considered it necessary to do so? Have there been precedents for such?


  9. @ Christopher Halsall December 13, 2010 at 1:43 pm
    Quote: “At Yardbroom, “Perhaps, just perhaps – when this requirement was drafted it was not envisaged that someone of the calibre of Marston Gibson would be Chief Justice of Barbados from the USA”.

    “I suspect you are right”.
    ************************
    Hi Christopher
    This is a tie-over from the Colonial Period when the word “Commonwealth” was often used to legitimate situations. Remember this was in the days of the Privy Council- held in England – it therefore meant it was reasonable to have a Higher Court in London: it was legitimate because it was part of the Commonwealth, it could therefore make decisions for us.

    It has nothing to do with “capability” and they can spin it as they like; some would rather have biased mediocrity than unbiased “competence”. . . it is that some fear.


  10. @checkit-out…

    You agree with my statement of “December 13, 2010 at 2:16 PM” that all changes to the law must be gazetted…

    And then you enter a terminal trajectory…

    Next?


  11. @Yardbroom: “This is a tie-over from the Colonial Period when the word โ€œCommonwealthโ€ was often used to legitimate situations. Remember this was in the days of the Privy Council- held in England โ€“ it therefore meant it was reasonable to have a Higher Court in London: it was legitimate because it was part of the Commonwealth, it could therefore make decisions for us.

    Please forgive me for this, but are ***WE*** all not past this?

    Or, perhaps put another way, should we not **ALL** be past this bovine excrement?


  12. The Bureaucracy of Barbados is a blessing but alas there is a thin divide between blessing and curse.


  13. Let me say up front that I would have no problem with Marston Gibson being appointed CJ as he is ably qualified (and being a Foundationer too) BUT according to the law of our land, he does not qualify. Simple!

    My big problem is that this DLP government is always hell bent on changing laws after the fact to suit them. How can the government go now and change the law to accommodate their choice, wont this be setting a bad precedent?

    The Dems came to power fooling Bajans that they were agents of change and wow, havent we gotten change!

    I well remember the hue and cry over David Simmons’ appointment and there was no law to change. But that’s the Dems for you. Remember how they put up those bill boards illegally during the election campaign? Remember how they appointed Arnie Walters as an executive chairman and when it was pointed out that that was against the regulations of the BWA, they said so what, we can change the rules and to this date, it has not been brought to parliament and the man is still in place!

    David Thompson probably did not know the law (did he really practice much, seemed more a politician all his life to me)? Did he really consult with Mia?

    The DLP bloggers seemingly embarrassed at this another foul up by this government now want to beat up every BLP blogger and once you dont agree with their point of view, they are bringing in all this negativity about breaking the old boys and now the worn out cliche, the man is the son of a poor black man, typical DLP hand book regulations.

    They will probably now have to wait until after the by election to have the two thirds to change the law or the speaker would have to vote. Wow, they keep going from bad to worse and dont blame the BLP, the statue of limitation has run out.


  14. @Prodigal Son: “Let me say up front that I would have no problem with Marston Gibson being appointed CJ as he is ably qualified (and being a Foundationer too) BUT according to the law of our land, he does not qualify.

    You sound ***EXACTLY*** like DR. GP.

    Hmmmm….


  15. @Christopher Halsall | December 13, 2010 at 2:53 PM

    Grateful if you would explain your “terminal trajectory” point. It doesn’t compute for me. The matter is a simple one. The appointment of Marston Gibson as the new CJ was mooted on BU several months ago. BU even went so far as to publish an abbreviated CV which showed that his experience was primarily in the US. If 15 years of experience in the British Commonwealth is one of the stated requirements for a CJ here it would not be rocket science to determine that Marston Gibson would have been ineligible under the current constitution. That should have been determined months ago and the necessary legal corrections put in place. Since the matter has reached less than one month before the new CJ is due to take up office, it seems obvious that the relevant authorities must have done something about it or risk serious embarrasment to themselves and the new CJ if they hadn’t.

    The point on gazetting any changes in law is not really germaine to the situation. Once the Government has the requisite votes it can pass and gazette anything it wants to. I’ve tried to point out to you that such can be done in a relatively short time frame even though it normally takes an inordinate amount of time. If Government wants to it can make the necessary changes fairly quickly.

    In any case the Government appears to have acted quite slowly on many matters including this one and may still get egg on its face for this one.

    But please explain your “terminal trajectory” and why it wasn’t called for in attempting to answer your question.


  16. @David and @Chris. The appointment of the Chief Justice has not been gazetted as yet. These appointments are not usually gazetted until just before the person takes office. I believe that as the Leader of the Opposition was consulted on his appointment and the Nation swiftly followed BU in announcing the appointment (but not the Advocate) we can safely assume that the Nation checked with its opposition cohorts and received the confirmation it required. So now, 4 months later, it questions the validity of The Chief’s appointment on the eve of its being gazetted. Fascinating.

    By the way, the late David Thompson did indeed practice law extensively and even appeared before the Privy Council. He was in partnership with Garth Patterson for a while. David Thompson was one of the lawyers who deservedly adorned the Inner Bar of Barbados. Whatever else idiots may want to question, it cannot be questioned that he was a first class lawyer.


  17. @Amused: “David Thompson was one of the lawyers who deservedly adorned the Inner Bar of Barbados. Whatever else idiots may want to question, it cannot be questioned that he was a first class lawyer.

    But then he died. And Live goes on…

    Next?


  18. @checkit-out: “But please explain your โ€œterminal trajectoryโ€

    Have you ever heard of the term “crash and burn”?

    Same idea.


  19. @Chris. And thus is the fate of us all.


  20. Why is it that the DEMS cant get anything right? I thought they had all the answers to every ill in Barbados and three years down the road they are so inept!

    How could they mess up a simple thing like the appointment of a CJ? The Dems can talk all they want, if they want to maintain any credibility, they will have to go to parliament and change the law and how would that come over to most right thinking Bajans? No one has a problem with Mr Gibson’s qualifications, far from it. But Mr Gibson cannot be appointed just because DLP bloggers demand that… “I dont even consider him to be CJ designate but the Chief”… The law is, he had to be practicing in a Commonwealth country for a least 15 years. DLP, let us see how you will spin this one!

    They just presented a budget and had to make so many adjustments and inplementation changes, what’s wrong with the DEMS?

    A by election is due by January 22, up to now the PM cant announce a date, he’s keeping it close to his chest, he says. You know why, they made a stink when Owen Arthur announced an election date in December 2007, so it would look bad if they do the same before Xmas. Up to now the PM cannot decide on a candidate, he wont reshuffle his cabinet, he’s still doing the work a dying man did.

    By the way, why did Garth Patterson break up the partnership with the first class lawyer, David Thompson? Is it true that David Thompson recommended himself to himself to become a QC?

    According to GP, educate me!


  21. @Amused: “And thus is the fate of us all.

    In actuality, only those that don’t realize that time can be dilated…


  22. Hi Chris; I bow out. These matters of time dilation, terminal trajectory, etc. are too high for me.


  23. @checkit-out: “Hi Chris; I bow out. These matters of time dilation, terminal trajectory, etc. are too high for me”.

    Please don’t bow out now my man! Stand up! When things get the most complicated is when you need to stand up the most!

    Please stand up!!!!


  24. Amused you see to have time to reply to certain post but no time to put up your explanation why there is no need to change the act. Most of the blog seem not to have problem with him being in the position other than saying they need to change the act to bring it inline for him to be appointed. So I put it to you why don’t you just present your evidence. We are still waiting.


  25. Dems always run when you challenge their “logic”. They never answer questions.
    I am still waiting on answers on CLICO from Bajan Panday.
    By the way, I heard today, Mr Physical Deficit has thrown his hat into the St John ring!


  26. @Prodigal Son (speaking in a gay voice): “Dems always run when you challenge their โ€œlogicโ€. They never answer questions.
    I am still waiting on answers on CLICO from Bajan Panday. By the way, I *heard* today, Mr Physical Deficit has thrown his hat into the St John ring!

    You *DON’T* say Prodigal Son!!!

    Should we squeak?

    Or laugh?


  27. Imagine being cross examined by kiki…

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XVVZPefbR4&fs=1&hl=en_US]

    I personally cannot.


  28. Let’s also try to imagine being cross examined by Laurie Anderson…

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8LquNy3fd8&fs=1&hl=en_US]

    If you can…


  29. David
    Yes, I objected to David Simmons’ move from M.P to C.J. I thought that we were tinkering with the judiciary and it will have its negative repercussions. Whether Mr. Simmons did a good job or not is besides the point, it would appear as though politics was taking over the judiciary and that is a dangerous thing to do. Similarly, in the case of Mr Gibson the same thing seems to be happening. From his academic qualifications and his experience, he seems well qualified but if he didn’t meet the other qualifications needed, that should disqualify him. Let me hasten and say that maybe, he is the best person for the job, since he is not in bed with the judiciary club of Barbados and maybe the DLP can apopoint someone to act in the position until they make the adjustments over a period of months but to jump hastily like the BLP, does not show a party who me they were for change.


  30. I was sailing along reading the Editorial in todayโ€™s Nation when I came across the following statement

    โ€œAs it stands right now, a Pakistani with 20 years experience has more right than Gibson to serve in the post, even though he is a โ€œborn and bredโ€ Bajanโ€

    Reading a bit further I found another statement which read โ€œAs stupid as that may seem, can we afford to tinker with the law in support of the man who is to be the number one law enforcerโ€

    I think that the answer to the question lies in the first statement so my question is why should a Pakistani; Nigerian; Indian;Australian,Canadian or fill in the blank have more right than Gibson to serve in the post?

    There are laws on the books in Barbados and countless other countries that are impractical in todayโ€™s world. There were put at a time when they were relevant for the time, they are not usually subject to any review and most often we only pay attention when some legal scholar brings them to our attention when the realty of them conflicts with the world of the 21st century.

    If this law is amended who is harmed? Will the citizens of Barbados suffer irreparable damage? Will it set some dangerous precedent that will imperil the future of Barbadians ?

    The previous PM stuck to the letter of the law when he appointed his Cabinet colleague to the post, this colleague met all the criteria according to the law, yet to many of us the appointment raised a quizzical eyebrow but the previous PM followed the law.

    Sometimes the law is an ass


  31. Bajans in the Disastapora should pay attention to this CJ ting.

    Returning home can be challenging.

  32. Johhny from Sin Michael Avatar
    Johhny from Sin Michael

    One interesting and somewhat alarming issue brought out by this topic, is the way some of you and others it seems, see Gibson as some sort of Messiah.

    I strongly suspect that you will be very disappointed with the end result, not to say that he is not somewhat capable, but that there is far more to this issue than appointing Gibson.

    But, who am I to say, give it two years and lets see.

  33. Johhny from Sin Michael Avatar
    Johhny from Sin Michael

    Another issue being clarified, is the obvious incompetence that is now permeating Barbados institutions and even companies.

    A previously strong BS&T has in the last ten years, lost its booming lumber yard and now its car dealdership.

    Competition or incompetence?

    Hospital in a mess, many schools not what they should be, a mess about to be made of the pharmacy industry due to the new ridiculous rules implemented in the budget, the Finance Permanent Secretary, according to reports, publicly alleging corruption in the collection of taxes, where will it end?

    It is time to accept that Barbados is going down fast and it will take strong leadership and integrity to pull it back, not hairy fairy politics.

    I suspect that 2013 has now become quite challenging for the incumbent party.


  34. BU had hoped the PM would have moved with haste to quell the debate on the CJ controversy. Well there is always tomorrow and then the next day, why hurry on something as important as a CJ controversy.


  35. Just thinking aloud.

    I do not know Mr. Gibson personally but I know some good lawyer friends of his who think he is extremely talented and having also read his CV on BU I think that he is an excellent choice for the vacant CJ post and should be installed there when the dust settles and the Government finds some means to wipe the egg off its face figuratively speaking
    Could there have been good reasons for mandating that a CJ should have 15 years recent experience in the commonwealth?
    Is the legal system in the US totally compatible with the ones in the commonwealth?
    How many of us follow the Judge Judy’s etc. on American TV and can opine that the system is the same as ours?
    If the relevant laws are changed what are the provisions that are likely to be put in place to ensure that a prospective CJ with no or little recent practical experience in jurisprudence in Barbados or the Caribbean be quickly brought up to reasonable equivalence in that area?


  36. I think they are looking for a reason why he can be appointed without changing the law since that would take less time.So we bring the case to Amused again to show us the reason why there is no need to change the act. I am sure the PM would use this same reason to confirm his appointment. So we just await Amused now for the reason.


  37. BU – David- deserves a pat on the back for this story, from its inception we have been informed, as a result we have some knowledge of what is going on in our country; and have made a contribution, however little it is. Other media outlets have kept their doors firmly closed.

    “Free information is the currency of a Democracy”

    Thomas Jefferson- third President of America
    April 13, 1743 – July 4, 1826.


  38. @Yardbroom

    Thanks for your plaudit but be assured BU is able to do what it does because of patriotic Bajans and friends like yourself who believe in the power of freedom of expression as an inalienable right to protect our democracy.


  39. BU-David;
    I concur with Yardbroom’s sentiments above and I would also like to mention here that you should be congratulated for running the best blog in Barbados.

    I think that the high quality of the contributions and the popularity and attractiveness of the blog are due in no small measure to your round-the-clock input in identifying and putting up topics for discussion, putting in your two cents worth in practically every topic, keeping the regulars up to date on almost everything that is going on in Barbados and beyond that is relevant to Barbados, maintaining a blog that accepts all shades of political thought, staying far from being judgemental, etc.

    Your contribution to the blogosphere in Barbados is without equal. Please keep it up.

  40. Dont blow my cover Avatar
    Dont blow my cover

    To David and all BU FANS

    THIS POST IS OFF TOPIC

    But I felt constrained to tell the forum of an impressive experience that I have just had with the Consul General office in Miami.

    I emailed them to request information concerning application for a Caricom Certificate for CSME Free Movement Of Skills Application, and received an answer from the Consul himself in less than an hour, and a promise to obtain the necessary information and advice from the relevant authorities in Barbados.

    Now we are prone to criticize the performance of our public servants when they err and fail to perform to our very demanding standards.

    I think it is meet and right that we should also laud and applaud them when the perform far above our expectations.

    I must confess too that this is not the first time that I have recieved such stellar service from this office in Miami.

    Perhaps we can have a section on BU where contented Bajans can express thier praise and satisfaction when they recieve timely and top class service from our public servants; especially those who are serving our people abroad.


  41. checkit-out
    You are querying the compatability of the American system against the Commonwealth, that is food for thought. The O.J. Simpson’s case is a good example, even though he was deemed innocent of the murder, yet he was further charged with a lesser count which dogged him for many years until he ended up in prison, so when the American system wants you they can get you; there are many other cases that can be brought to fore. maybe, that’s why one of the qualifications for C.J is the person is fully knowledgable about our system. One bad move by Mr Gibson can ruin the appointment made by the DLP government. I still think he is the right man, or better that the DLP is looking in the right direction by selecting someone from outside the box but I’m not sure their choice is the right one.


  42. The Governor General is an Attorney-at-law, the Prime Minister is an Attorney-at-law, the Attorney General is an Attorney-at-law, the Leader of the Opposition is an Attorney-at-law and Mr Gibson Chief Justice designate is an Attorney-at-law. You tell me that all of these could be wrong? If Mr. Gibson does not know whether or not his appointment is valid, then he should not turn up for work.


  43. Anyone remembers the appointment of Arni Walters to the then and still non-existent post of Executive Chairman at BWA which in effect constructively dismissed the General Manager? This would just be a continuation of unlawful appointments.


  44. The law of the land was changed to get rid of a former Chief Government Electrical Engineer in the early 1990’s!!!

    The case was recently decided at the CCJ, 17 years later!!


  45. The fundamental problem is this. Some Lawyers in Barbados are concerned that Marston Gibson might be the Dr.GP of the legal profession.

    Imagine our very own Dr.GP as the CMO and his equivalent as the Chief Justice.

    Too bad GP study Medecine instead of law.


  46. If David Thompson was the first class lawyer as claimed on this blog, how come he did not first check the law governing the appointment of a CJ bearing in mind the man has never practiced law here? Wouldn’t it be common sense to check first?

    Does anyone on this blog know anything of any rulings he may have made in the USA as a judge or is he purely academic?

    We must be wary of academics. President Barack Obama appointed mainly academics a part of his economic team with no real world experience and boy oh boy, look at what’s going on now, they are leaving and going back to their cuckoo lands. There is a vast difference between the real world and the academic world…..reality!

    It certainly was not smart of Mr Gibson to comment on the prostitute case recently to Tony Best if indeed he is going to be CJ!!


  47. @ Hants
    So we have a CJ designate, we have a CMO designate (Dr. GP), now what we gine do wid you and AH from Boston? Perhaps we could plan for a Bridgetown Tea Party instead of de Boston one. Murrdurrrr! Ah wunda wey dah Bonny P gorn wen yuh is lookin'[ fuh she say sumptin’?


  48. @ de hood,
    I am not in the same league as the above mentioned gentlemen so no high office for me.
    De only degree I got is a underarm deodorant I does use.

    But I will support de Bridgetown Tea Party as long as Dr.GP and BU bloggers involved.


  49. @ SPECIAL ONE
    there is really nothing wrong with being a theorists or academic per se

    the problem begins when you can not see that academia is just a basis or spring board for action

    whats the point of knowing doh ray me and you cant use that scale to make a song

    or knowing how to count and you giving wrong change and robbing yourself or others
    UNFORTUNATELY MANY CANT MAKE THE TRANSITION FROM USING WHAT THEY LEARNED TO CHANGE WHAT THEY SEE ABOUT THEM

    SOMETIMES THOUGH, THEY ARE NOT GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY BECAUSE MANY WHAT THE STATUS TO STAY QUO!

    @de hood

    we have a CJ designate, BUT WE DO NOT have a CMO designate IN (Dr. GP), THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN
    GP IS KNOWN FOR BEING A REBEL AND TO SPEAK HIS MIND AND SPEAK HIS MIND PLAINLY

    I reflected on the matter and realize that I blew my chances when as an assistant MOH I told of the then Chief 30 years ago .Then 20 years ago I did not take the opportunity to be a MOH or the offer to go study Gerontology.

    I dont think they would like my style because I would be running around the country trying to to change things instead of sitting in an office with collar and tie pushing paper

    @ Hants
    Is Mr Gibson a hard headed straight foward chap who will seek to do what ought to be done? Then he will be in serious trouble home man. jealousy and envy will obstruct his path. But if he is appointed instead of working on a contract so that his services can not easily be terminated, then he might be able to make progress.


  50. GP I am hoping that Mr.Gibson is a competent professional with integrity.

    His advantage is that he has not been immersed in the culture of Bajan middle and upper class professionals.

    I am hoping that he will see this as an opportunity to be the best CJ Barbados has ever had.

    He will need the public support of people like Amused,Anonlegal,Jeff Cumberbatch and the few other honest members of the Legal Profession in Barbados.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading