Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Suleman Esuf

On Thursday October 14, 2010 Suleman Esuf was granted bail of 1 million dollars with two sureties of $500,000.00 in the Bridgetown Traffic Court. We recall Esuf was charged with having a traffickable quantity of cannabis stated as 2778.38 pounds with a street value of 11 million dollars.  It should come as no surprise that Esuf was granted bail. In our system of jurisprudence a person is considered innocent until proven guilty. In a case which does not involve rape or murder and if you have the money for the best lawyers little time is spent on remand. In this case Esuf had a cooling-off at Dodds prison for one month. He returns to court March 8, 2011.

BU continues to be very perturbed at the lawlessness which has become prevalent in our small society. The establishment in Barbados maybe comfortable with Commissioner Darwin Dottin’s statistics but a more than casual survey of the Barbados landscape gives reason to be alarm. Barbadians have become consumed by the political issues of the day but as the saying goes, the city burns while some fiddle. Yes we should be concerned about the political goings-on in Barbados, political stability has been a key attribute of our stable democracy. However as can be seen in Jamaica, Guyana, Trinidad and even St. Lucia, rising crime has the effect of destabilizing a society and in the process threaten its economic wellbeing.

Take a trundle through many neighbourhoods/villages and have a look at the side streets, behind the social centres, in the backroom of village shops to name a few. What do you see? Large numbers of young unemployed men gambling, smoking/engaging in illegal substances. These men are committing crimes which are not being reported Commissioner. In an environment where there is an economic recession that has led to rising unemployment and those activities across the island have been on the increase.

Our greatest fear is that Barbadians in neighbourhoods/villages across Barbados are beginning to experience uncertainty. The fear which is driving many to keep their children indoors when they return from school, the fear which is seeing many people searching for the opportunity to seek habitat away from neighbourhoods they have known all their lives.

What is of concern is that members of the RBPF who live in neighbourhoods/villages as described do nothing or in some cases participate in the undesirable activities. It is no surprise that Trinidad and Tobago, St. Lucia and others would turn to expatriate police officers to lead the fight against crime. Based on our observation BU seeks little solace in Commissioner Dottin’s statistics which paint Barbados in a state of tranquillity compared to our Caribbean neighbours.

It is encouraging to read of Hamilton Lashley’s efforts to convene a conference in Barbados and to invite politicians of the grassroots variety. Those politicians and social practitioners who are not* afraid to visit the blocks, roll-up their sleeves and get their hands dirty. This is what it will take to win back our neighbourhoods/villages.

Our society has allowed itself to degenerate to a level where and eye to maintaining moral standards and values have been placed on the backburner. It should be evident to our leaders by surveying the region that if we continue to allow our society to follow a rudderless path there will be nothing but bad in the offing. Instead we continue to be consumed by what is popular. We continue to frame the solutions to problems in political arguments.

How can the Attorney General and Deputy Prime Minister continue to ignore the estrange relationship which exist between Commissioner Dottin and Assistant Commissioner Bertie Hinds? What message is it sending? What effect is it having on the hierarchy of the RBPF? What message does it send to wider society? Even if Assistant Commissioner Hinds retires soon, the vestige of the system which allowed the dysfunction to exist for so long gives reason to be still be concerned.

BU continues to be concerned about information which is alleged to have been suppressed in the Campus Trendz matter.  We will continue to probe the matter and update the BU family when we can.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

32 responses to “Suleman Esuf:The Fear Of A Lawless Society”


  1. On October 16 2010 at 7:42 pm, an anonymous blogger using the moniker of “I observe” posted a comment that, unsupported by any evidence, was, in the opinion of BU, scandalous and malicious. BU has therefore removed the comment and tenders its sincere apologies for any embarrassment sustained by persons named and/or identified in the comment. BU makes this unqualified apology with equal and greater prominence than the offensive comment.

    BU refers bloggers once again to its comments guidelines, in particular those guidelines dealing with defamation. BU gives notice that the rumour, innuendo and defamations traditionally practiced on the political platforms throughout the country by those in government and those in opposition and the wannabes, will receive zero tolerance here. We are an organ of free speech, but free speech does not exist when scandalous comments are made without proof, to the detriment of the rights and freedoms of others.

    David – BU


  2. Comment Deleted by David


  3. This letter writer sounds very much like WIV. His narrative assessment is the cue.


  4. This article is on the ball on what is going on in Barbados.
    The police have given up on marijuana. Marijuana is smoked openly at football games at every community out of season football tournament. The smoke rises like a volcano erupting, there is no hiding. The court pages show a couple of persons being charged but it is out of hand.
    Gambling, cock and dog fighting and prostitution are on the increase openly and the police just drive by in air conditioned vans.
    The business sector and dishonest custom officers are to take some of the blame for what is happening in this country. I hope the corruption bill covers custom officers and their new found assets. I will argue unless a custom officer wins the lotto he or she would have to be Houdini to be able to build three apartments, have a house and open a business with his salary. Custom officers get real bribes in Barbados and live large.

  5. Clowning around Avatar

    Tell me Why, If I were you I would not be as worried about who wrote it, as much as I would be about the content, it could have some real merit.


  6. @David. Do we know if the accused, Mr Esuf, is a Barbados citizen? If not, in my role as Devil’s Advocate, do you not think that the $1 million bail requirement is a good idea? It seems well thought out to me. In our legal system, Mr Esuf is innocent until proven guilty and this bail had enabled him to demonstrate his bona fides, but protected Barbados at the same time.

    Whatever the outcome, whoever was importing the drugs has lost $11 million. And Mr Esuf has been given a choice – stay and be tried by a jury of your peers and establish, or not, your innocence. Or skip – and be out of pocket $1 million, plus having a record with Interpol, with alerts attached to your name and passport at every port you travel to.

    Thus, in my opinion, has the magistrate in question dealt with the matter and also provided Mr Esuf with the opportunity of ensuring that no charge for his incarceration, pending trial, are sustained by the Bajan taxpayer. It also deals with the issue of public perception and the jury pool, in that the inference is clear – the magistrate obviously decided that Mr Esuf’s guilt was not certain and was a matter for a jury, but protected Barbados (and Mr Esf) against all eventualities.


  7. @Amused

    If it is the law it is the law. It seems unjust that because a person charges has access to resources he or she can escape the duress of remand while the ‘small man’ is unable to benefit. No wonder poor people feel that the law sometimes places them at a disadvantage.


  8. @David. Agreed. It is most unfortunate that the little man often cannot afford the bail that is set. Sadly, it is all about affordability and the courts do need, in granting bail, to provide an accused with strong reasons not to disappear. It is certainly something that the Attorney General and the new CJ need to look at. Moreover, it is a matter that I think ought to be discussed by the blogs. The truth is that in his case, you can argue both ways……the magistrate could have remanded the accused, but then that decision would almost certainly have been appealed to a already backed-up (largely due to judicial delinquency) court system and bail might well have been granted – I would say, almost certainly would have been granted – and it might have been increased to $2 million or it may have been reduced to $250,000. So, more court time and taxpayers’ money spent. I think, in all the circumstances, the magistrate has made the correct call, even though I am not happy for the reasons you state. It isn’t an easy call, David. Given what I have said, what do you think you and the family would do if you were the magistrate? That, by the way, is a most respectful question, because all too often we become mired in precedent and custom and just don’t think outside the box. It is why a lot of legal professionals read BU and other blogs – to get a fresh slant on issues.

    I do reflect, however, that anyone (and I in no way prejudge the accused) caught with $11 million worth of drugs on them in places like Malaysia would not have been granted bail, as it would constitute a capital crime. Disproportionate, inexcusable and draconian as that may be – as I certainly think it is.


  9. @Amused

    Thanks for your comment. Certainly a good place to start the discussion would be to ask why schedule a case which is as significant as this one (the size of the haul) 6 months from now? Why can’t the system recognize that a case like this should be tagged as urgent and demonstrate to the community we mean business. Often times the elapse time from charge to hearing gives time for evidence to be ‘compromised’ among other things.


  10. @David & Amused, In my opinion, there should be no bail for people charged with drug trafficking.
    Drugs can maim,kill and destroy the minds and lives of young people.
    Drugs are pushed to all and sundry including school children.

    That is probably why Drug trafficking is considered a capital crime in some countries.


  11. @Hants

    We are on the same page.

    We have seen our society slowly being destroyed by the scourge of drugs.

    We would have someone who it is alleged brings 2770 pounds of cannabis into the island and we would treat with the case as if he was caught with a spliff.

    We continue to point to the Singaporean model in Barbados without understanding there is a discipline and philosophy which has to be taken onboard.


  12. @David and Hants. In a case this size, you have to allow the defense all kinds of leeway – like time to bring in overseas witnesses etc. You cannot refuse them this time, otherwise if there is a conviction, it would be unsafe and liable to be overturned on appeal. The court has a duty to allow the defense reasonable time in which to formulate its defense. I cannot think that allowing a successful appeal would be in the interests of Barbados. And we do not know, but the defense might well come up with exculpatory evidence that forces the DPP to withdraw the charges. Two adages – a man/woman is innocent until proven guilty – and – justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done. I am not surprised by the 6 month delay. I would have been surprised had there NOT been a delay of something like that. It may seem unreasonable, but in fact it is very reasonable in the circumstances of overseas witnesses.


  13. @Amused,
    You are probably correct as far as the current laws are concerned.

    However the time has come to treat a Drug trafficker the same as you would treat a person who has killed 6 people.

    Absolutely no bail. Let them stay in jail until trial.


  14. First off the guy is a bajan,so stop with the “he is a foreigner talk”. Second the comment which was posted but deleted is what is being rumoured all around bim at the moment,Why is it that the guy has skipped the island all of a sudden and he is not being brought back.Was he not caught on camera as well as rumour states? someone has to be the scape goat in this case and its going to be Mr Esuf ,so that the other big well connected guys can get off from this one.Also to the one who said some one has lost 11 mil is false.He has only lost what he has invested and it would be no where near 11 mil,perhaps around 4 mil or so.I may be wrong due to the fact that i have no experience in purchasing illegal norcotics.


  15. THE SCHOOLS IN BARBADOS AINT TEACHING NOTHING

    MANY TEACHERS DO NOT CARE IF SOME CHILDREN LEARN OR NOT AS LONG THESE TEACHERS COLLECT THEIR SALARIES.

    MANY TEACHERS HAVE MADE THAT ASSERTION AND ONLY PAY ATTENTION TO THOSE WHO THEY FEEL WILL DO WELL IN 11 PLUS AND THAT IS A BIG PROBLEM.

    CHILDREN ARE ONLY PREPARED FOR THE REASON OF PASSING EXAMS NOT TAUGHT HOW TO LIVE LIFE


  16. What is clear is that in a country as tiny as Barbados the drug trade cannot function without the support of legal structures like the people in the ports of entry, police, banks, customs officials etc. We need to crack this thing. The court system will have to play an integral part. How many members of the bench/judiciary are in the loop?


  17. Man crack what thing what David?

    You would have to build 2 more prisons like Dodds and have the will to lock up your own friends and family.
    You would have to show a police officer how worthy he/she is for just over $2000 a month.
    Show the guys on the block that 7 Grade1s will get you a job when you leave school.
    Take away the lucrative aspect of the trade (It will not create any more zombies than we currently have).
    ……..and we can go on and on and on.


  18. i suspect esuf may have two passport . one is bajan another may be indian or british . who knows . but 1 ml is good size bail . nobody would try to escape the bail . still it’s unbelievable that this is one man job . many more involve in it . god knows how many. really wonder how long ago this so called bussiness was going on .


  19. A 22 yrs old youngman has a access of very many millons . it’s very strange.


  20. @Technician

    So we are back to decriminalization? See that California and other US states are getting ready to make this a reality. They want the dollars.


  21. @David. I have always said that cannabis should be decriminalised. I expect that it will be, as soon as governments have found a way to tax it. I have also always said that the argument that a recreational drug like cannabis (weed) will lead to drug dependency and addiction holds about as much water as the claim that recreation drinking leads to alcoholism. In any such situation, you are going to find some (a very small minority)who become dependent. But why the hell should everyone else be penalized – ANSWER: Taxation!!!

    This in no way excuses the bringing in of what is currently an illegal substance. However, may I respectfully suggest that the value of the shipment will reduce itself to that of a shipment of sour grass the moment it is legal for people to grow it in their own back gardens. Or front gardens. All we are doing by keeping cannabis illegal is lining the pockets of the drug dealers and cartels. So let us keep that money in our pockets and do a little creative light gardening instead.


  22. Amused wrote “the argument that a recreational drug like cannabis (weed) will lead to drug dependency and addiction holds about as much water as the claim that recreation drinking leads to alcoholism…So let us keep that money in our pockets and do a little creative light gardening instead.”

    Dear Amused: Today I must disagree with you. The number of families who are damaged by excessive alcohol comsupmtion is not insignificant.

    So why then should we should legalize another “recreational” drug?

    If we want to do a little creative backyard or front yard gardening and let families keep a little more money in their pockets I THINK that a MUCH BETTER suggestion would be to encourage families to grow a some okras, bananas, chives,sweet peppers, golden apples, pears, pigeon peas, tomatoes etc. in their back AND FRONT yards.

    Families would eat better. The available evidence convinces me that that people who eat straight from the good land (and sea) live longer, healthier and happier lives (and they do this more cheaply that people who wait for foreigners to feed them). AND just maybe the hefty National Drug Service bill would go down a little bit, as we may not have to medicate so many diabetics, hypertensives etc.

    AND working in the good land, even if for only a few hours on weekends provides good exercise, and can be an opportunity for family bonding, AND it can be done on as little as 200 square feet. Most families in Barbados have enough land to make them self sufficient in okras and pigeon peas for example.

    No man we should not be encouraging people to grow marijuana when their grandparents with hypertension can’t afford to eat green vegetables.

    When every single square inch of these fields and hills beyond recall are abundantly growing food crops, then I could go with you on the marijuana thing.

    But when our parents can’t afford to eat green, then I must respectfully disagree. But not today.

    A major proplem with Barbados today is that people want too much recreation (and not enough work)


  23. Dear Amused:

    I long for the good old days when even BAJAN GRANDMOTHERS HAD BALLS.

    If you did wrong she called you on it, and for good measure she may well have beat you for it too.

    Now if a youngster is told that he is wrong we hear “you don’t like my son” (or gandson) and by this I mean daughers and granddaughters too.

    Look we don’t have to like your son (or daughter).

    If smoking marijuana is unlawful (and bad for his/her health) we should tell him/her so, and for good measure lock up the traffickers. Now we are hearing legalize it, cause Little Johnny want to smoke it, and Little Johnny must always get what he wants even if it is not good for him.

    Well I say tell Little Johnny if he wants to practise agriculture, he should be growing food for his grandmother (and his children too)

    And since Little Johnny is young and strong, he can grow food on mornings before he goes to work and on evenings when he comes home and all day Saturday ( because what the hell we know that the Littel Johnnies don’t do any housework)

    Didn’t one appear in court a few weeks ago, a hard back man of 20 who was disrespectful to his mother because she refused to iron his pants.

    NO MOTHER ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH SHOULD BE IRONING FOR ANYTHING FOR ANY 20 YEAR OLD.


  24. @J. Sorry for the delay in responding to you. Strange as it may seem, we are not in total disagreement – and when you find the way to persuade people voluntarily from indulging in recreational substances, like booze and weed, I will gladly go along with you. However, I would have thought that the lesson of US prohibition when fortunes on booze were made by gangsters like Al Capone and many murders committed in furtherance of the gaining of those fortunes, would have been learned by governments worldwide. Indeed, the cannabis trade mirrors exactly the symptoms of the trade in bootleg booze in the States during prohibition. However, I am firmly convinced that my view that a recreational puff is different to the recreational rum, only because the puff is less dangerous to the health – it is better to puff. Personally, I enjoy an occasional drink (and I do that very seldom – maybe once a month, if that, and never more than one – and I suffer a serious headache next morning) and an occasional puff (which I do about every six months to a year – and I suffer no ill effects whatever). On harder drugs, I completely agree with you that they must remain illegal. BTW, weed grows beautifully when interdispersed with things like ocras and peas and even Bajan snapdraggons – in fact the leaf is almost exactly the same. And I believe we should always but local.


  25. What is the latest with this case Mr DPP?


  26. Reblogged this on Barbados Underground and commented:

    <

    p align=”justify”>The bedrock of a stable Barbados post Independence has been a reliable justice system. Not perfect but stable. Increasingly in the last decade there has been obvious deterioration to the delivery of justice in Barbados. Many Barbadians though remain ignorant about the level of manipulation affecting the justice system. The government in office has a mantra about building a society and not only an economy. The inaction by the government is inconsistent with building an economy. How is it possible if the justice system can be manipulated by criminal elements?

    Again we highlight this blog posted on the 16 October 2010. What is the status of this case anyone!


  27. The attempts to lionize the recently deceased D. Williams former CJ need to remain grounded in facts. Market vendor says that none of the decisions by Williams has ever been reversed. This is an error which should be corrected. In Gatherer v Gomez, Williams presided over the Court of Appeal, his fellow justices of Appeal were Husbands and Belgrave. The case is said to have reached the Court of Appeal in 13 weeks. The Court sided with the defendant, then bishop of the Anglican Diocese in Barbados. Chezley Boyce, attorney at law for Rev. Gatherer, took the appeal to the Privy Council which promptly reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal and upheld the decision of the trial judge.


  28. Um Suleman Esuf is well connected to political sources, some of whom might have been recently deceased. Part of an organized criminal gang in Barbados who the police cannot touch because it’s Barbados. A backward country which within a generation will be like Honduras, because we turn a blind eye to public corruption, the voice of the people is silent and allow the high ups to get away with it.

    While countries like Honduras will be a paradise, because they (with the help of the USA) are institutiting wide sweeping changes to beat public corruption, move their States into the 21st century and have a society which functions on the rule of law across all sections.

    Just let the current level of stupidity and entrenched untouchable corruption and money laundering to go unhindered for one whole generation and you will see an economy destroyed wholistically. We’ll be Haiti.


  29. Posh, corruption is universal across the board brother, and if you doubt what I am saying then you’re obviously in for a crude awakening. Because even the American system of governance, which is by all intents and purposes a cut above the rest, is riddle with special interest.


  30. @Posh

    BU endorses your last comment.


  31. Last I checked the USA had a Bureau which investigates public corruption and even prosecutes anyone on any level. It doesn’t matter that corruption is everywhere, everyone knows that, it matters that other people do something about it or they are trying to, we are not, and have never tried to. Name one prosecution of a political individual.

    Senators, congressmen get locked up in jail in the States.


  32. @Posh

    Here is an example of the US doing something  (trying) about corruption.

    Live updates: McDonnell guilty of corruption

    Former Virginia governor Robert F. McDonnell wades through several members of the media after being found guilty of corruption at the federal courthouse in Richmond on Thursday. (Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post)

    Former Virginia governor Robert F. McDonnell wades through several members of the media after being found guilty of corruption at the federal courthouse in Richmond on Thursday. (Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post)

    Jurors in the public corruption trial of former Virginia governor Robert F. McDonnell and his wife, Maureen, have found the couple guilty of several corruption counts. The McDonnells faced a 14-count indictment that alleged that they lent the prestige of the governor’s office to a Richmond area businessman and that, in exchange, the businessman lavished them with gifts http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/liveblog-live/liveblog/live-updates-jury-reaches-verdict-in-mcdonnell-corruption-trial/and money.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/liveblog-live/liveblog/live-updates-jury-reaches-verdict-in-mcdonnell-corruption-trial/

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading