← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Dr. Don Marshall, Senior Fellow, UWI Cave Hill
Dr. Don Marshall, Senior Fellow, UWI Cave Hill

There comes a time in the affairs of man when he must take the bull by the tail and face the situation – W. C. Fields

The recent downgrade in the outlook of Barbados investment paper by Standards & Poors given our  BBB  rating continues to generate much debate in Barbados. What seems to be fuelling the debate even more is the hint that a downgrade to our investment grade maybe around the corner given the rapid rate Barbados continues to accumulate debt. Barbadians have become alarmed at the prospect of having its investment paper perched at the brink of junk rating, a status most unfamiliar to Barbadians through the years. The fallout from attracting low credit rating by the credit rating agencies is the high cost to borrow if Barbados needs to float bonds in the capital markets.

Isn’t it ironic the current financial crisis which precipitated the global recession and led developing countries like Barbados to go enter an economic tailspin would have to suffer the penalty of credit rating downgrades by agencies which played a part to begin with?  BU rejects the explanation by Professor Dr. Avinash Persaud that the credit rating agencies failed when rating structured products and not country ratings. How can one excuse the model for one area of their business over the next?

Dr. Avinash D. Persaud, Chairman of Intelligence Capital Ltd

The current debate from the academics has tossed out some interesting takeaways for John Citizen. In one corner we have the world renown Barbadian Professor Dr. Avinash Persaud who believes the imminent downgrade of Barbados investment paper to junk status will be disastrous and must be avoided at all cost. In the other corner we have the homegrown Senior Fellow at UWI Sir Arthur Lewis Institute Dr. Don Marshall who believes Barbados should seize the opportunity to find creative ways to reduce government spending and enable the environment to encourage entrepreneurial projects to lead growth by expanding exports. He has been very bold by suggesting the Barbados Defence Force should be bastardized to support the police recruitment drive to benefit from opportunity cost savings.

BU is on the side of Dr. Don Marshall. Interestingly we are about to celebrate our 43 year of independence and Dr. Marshall has been strident in advocating the dismantlement of the Barrow (Father of Independence) model which has served us well. The billions of dollars which Barbados has invested in our people in the post-independence period now has to spew forth results. It is crunch time! In makes no sense boasting of how Barbados has used education to enfranchise its people but we continue to build out an economy based on mendicancy i.e. tourism and foreign direct investment

It seems the opposition party remains fixed on sucking political mileage from the defensive economic position the government finds itself. The political polarization in Barbados makes it mandatory that both political parties demonstrate leadership to bring the country together now more than ever to generate ideas. What better time than in the month of November to do it.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

114 responses to “It Is Crunch Time”


  1. @Rawdon

    The rubbish comment was made tongue and cheek, no offence taken at all.


  2. Denis, what you think of any blogger is your business. Background information on people like you is important. You have access to certain information from the privileged position you hold.

    And now you have background information about me. Or so you say. And who cares? Did you talk to the US security forces again? Or the diplomatic representatives of the mother country? Good.

    You have a nasty strategy of making broad sweeping statements about Barbados and people who live here and then when questioned on your innacuracies, you smugly and dangerously start to pull back.

    You also have a latent dislike of this country. You can’t conceal it. Your writings, your topic selection, your snide put-downs, your supercilious rantings. You are one unhappy person living in a great country.

    Sad.

    Barbadians should know that you make such statements from such a privileged IMF position! Simple. Amazing too.

    Publicist? Did that disturb you? Why? Its your reputation. The only word I forgot was (self) publicist.

  3. Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) Avatar
    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)

    @Veritas,
    One thing that is not contestible is that people who do not reveal themselves clearly have something to hide. What? Why? What is the fear? We may never know, but hiding they are.

    I do not need to check on an unknown person, but I can play the game of pretending I know something about someone and leave the impression that I have knowledge. It’s an empty exercise though.

    What is clear is that I write about a wide range of topics but some you do not like or on which you have differing views. If you wished the world to know your views then you too could write and let those who share your views say “Yea” and the others say “Nay”. But that is the joy of democracies and I love being able to have my views out there for others to dissect.

    As for privileged positions, I would gladly offer you a day of mine any time.

    Read again what you wrote: “You have a nasty strategy of making broad sweeping statements about Barbados and people who live here”. Hang on. Isn’t that ‘nasty strategy’ what we read every day on this blog and in the papers–sweeping statements about Barbados and people who live here?

    On inaccuracies, I notice a tendency of some who when asked to corroborate what they claim as errors have a veritable habit of going dreadfully silent. Hmm.

    Odd choice of name, Veritas, coming as it does from the goddess of ‘Truth’ and the mother of ‘Virtue’. Would that we knew them well.


  4. I agree with LIB, and I as a Bajan personally feel that he is in a somewhat unique position to look at our country from a failry objective perspective. If you don’t like the truth and are in denial it is dangerous, as time is now of the essence.

    DLP rode into power a couple of years ago ready to make sweeping changes in integrity, transparency, anti-corruption and so on. These would have made our country accoutable to itself. But all for nought as the background noise and blogsquabbling seems to eclipse the true needs of this once non-corrupt island. Do you hear me? I said “once non-corrupted”.

    DLP appears to be merely tinkering, in a dangerous hands-off way, but when it comes to making new government contracts or doling out cash for bailouts moving ahead happily, playing what appears to be a duplicitous game with our tax finances, while we worry about how to make up a deficit.

    That’s the way I see DLP, and I too am part of your mirror reflection today, Barbados.

    DLP needs to get more seriously hands-on about our island’s financial safety and fulfill more of its given mandate, the mandate that was promised, the mandate of integrity, that we the voters exchanged for our vote.

    Otherwise we’ll always have treasury leakage and corruption in office. Maybe if we the masses could know that our government contracts were made with integrity, and some accountability, then we would be more satisfied to deal with having a deficit to make up.

    Make political milking of the treasury part of the past, DLP, and then you’ll have better support of the masses again. If you don’t you’ll see more people (like this) speaking out on the blogs and/or on the street.

    Enjoy your time and diligently be mindful of what you promised.

  5. Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) Avatar
    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)

    @Veritas,
    I’m very happy to be judged, and I hope you are too. To help your memory, let others see how good you are at dealing with inconvenient truths.

    The thread below (from BU’s post “Walking on Thin Air” http://bajan.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/walking-on-thin-air/), on the UN Human Development Index is to me telling.

    I had written on my blog that Barbados’ ranking had slipped. Another reader said that was not so. I cited the UN figures, which showed the fall. You still argued that there was no fall. Despite what you said, local politicians eventually got their teeth into this issue, see http://www.barbadosadvocate.com/newsitem.asp?more=politics&NewsID=7094. Senator Liz Thompson wanted to say the drop was due to the current DLP government. Former PM, Sir Lloyd Erskine Sandiford, pointed out that given the timing of the data in the report any decline should be seen as due to the former BLP administration. Under his administration he claimed the index reached its highest level.

    So are you going to argue that the former DLP PM and BLP’s Senator Liz Thompson are all in some conspiracy with me to mislead Barbados?
    ++++++++++++++++++
    Veritas // October 18, 2009 at 3:43 PM

    DJ, my point is simple. Your glee was evident, if we had slipped. Pity. We didn’t so you were silent after your error was reveald. Simple.
    #

    Anonymous // October 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    @Veritas, what I dislike about certain exchanges is a simple thing: cherry picking. I cited two reports by the UN which showed clearly that Barbados’ position has changed (I did not make up the numbers as you suggested; I gave the references. Did you look at them?). I give the references. You make no note of that (as if they do not exist). I did not produce the reports. A note in the latest UN report makes a point inconsistent with their own published works and you focus on that as fact to contradict. That’s not how one establishes a fact.

    The fact that most of the piece does not even discuss Barbados is not of interest to you. I call that a bit blinkered. But, there you go.

    If you have looked at the UN reports could you write a sentence that squares their internal contradictions?
    #

    Anonymous // October 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Anonymous // October 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM is Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)…
    #

    Veritas // October 18, 2009 at 4:26 PM

    DJ, you are jesting I am sure. Selective? Did you carry out the same analysis for Jamaica to see if there were contradictions? Or Bahamas? Or the United States? Was your analysis broad-based or are you just a publicity seeker?

    Use your knowledge wisely, please.
    #

    Anonymous // October 18, 2009 at 4:44 PM

    @Veritas, for me there was no contradiction as I was using the raw statistics of two reports, not relying on what one report told me had been the historical development. I did raise the question of the apparent inconsisteny with UNHDR via their website but as is common with large bureaucracies I am still awaiting a reply.

    I don’t see the readership that my blog gets as giving much real publicity. As the piece had not generated more than my average 1-2 comments, I did not think it hit anybody especially more than other things I write.
    #

    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) // October 18, 2009 at 4:58 PM

    @Veritas. What a quick check shows is a series of inconsistencies. I compared the raw 2009 report data against the raw 2007/8 report (first figure; and the bases for my commentary) and then what the 2009 report indicates was the change with the 2007/8 report (in a summary table that I did not use): US (-1/-1); Bahamas (-3/0); Antigua (+10/+1); Jamaica (-1/-8); Barbados (-6/+2).

    Don’t ask me why the figures differ, but I will let you know if UNHDR reply.
    ++++++++
    After that last point, your interest seemed to go cold. Why?

    That’s me done.


  6. The DLP did say all along that management of the economy was not important and that they will concentrate on social issues and leave the management of the economy to the public servants who were well trained.

    It is not clear for all to see that the management of the economy is indeed critical and that the DLP does not know what it is doing.

    Here is unemployment under DLP rule:

    1987 17.9
    1988 17.3 (average based on information provided)
    1989 15.4 (average based on information provided)
    1990 15.0

    Elections: DLP re-elected. Unemployment began its climb under the DLP starting from 1990.

    1991 20.3
    1992 23.0
    1992 25.0 (4th quarter)
    1993 26.2 (2nd quarter)
    1993 24.3
    1994 21.1
    1994 21.7 (3rd quarter)

    The BLP inherited unemployment at

    1995 19.6

    The DLP is heading back there fast. What “Pathway to Progress?” Seems more like highway to poverty.

    In 1994 Mr. Thompson held out “BUS FARE AND LUNCH MONEY AS HIS EMPLOYMENT MODEL. In 2009, he improves on that by telling university students that he cannot find jobs for any body. SHAME!!!.

    Sorry if the number do not line up for ease of reading. But I will explain if required.

  7. Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) Avatar
    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)

    @RJH Adams

    Rawdon,

    Many of the comments on the thread reflect that people have not read or listened to most of what Prof. Persaud has said recently or over the past 12 months. His piece in this week’s Business Barbados, http://www.businessbarbados.com/wordpress/?p=271, gives a good summary of his proposals for what the government should be doing, as well as some issues about what some officials have been arguing. One section worth noting I reproduce below:

    ‘The bottom line is this. Barbados like all other Caricom nations is facing a significant loss of demand and it has no fiscal room for maneuver. This means we can only do five things. (1) We must improve the value for money for every dollar the Government does spend – there is no room for superfluous spending (2) The central bank must busy itself helping banks give forbearance to solvent companies in liquidity difficulties – especially those who commit to holding on to staff. The Bank’s idea of facilitating a loan repayment moratorium is a good one but needs to be better thought through than it has been. (3) We need to better make use of all of the resources from the multilateral agencies we have access to. If they want to lend us money to build a waste to energy plant and this reinforces our broad if not detailed strategy – what are we waiting for? (4) Government must prioritise big projects that have been stalled and ease obstacles without spending cash. (5) The government needs to soften the impact of unemployment on the most vulnerable and keep them engaged in working life.

    The Government has announced steps in all of these directions. S&P is telling us we are running out of time and we need to up the pace and persistence. I hope we hear otherwise it is not us who will be having the last laugh.’

    He also puts into good context some comments that suggest that Barbados’ reserves are at a comfortable level by some international norms. Like him, I think the danger is for people to think that 20 weeks of cover is adequate in current conditions.

    I think there is a great misunderstanding about the role of the credit agencies and you highlight some. One of them for me is that without the ratings, investors would need to do more of their own due diligence and that would require a level of openness about government finances that is considerably more than now. The other point is that there are always lenders who are not concerned by a borrower’s credit worthiness. Amongst nations, the Republic of China comes to mind as a lender with very deep pockets who will be guided by its own socio-economic-political agenda when lending but it always has bilateral conditions of some sort, and these often relate to how the loan is collateralised (eg by minerals) or how the proceeds are used (eg using Chinese workers and materials). [China’s activities in Africa are clear testimony to this.] Amongst private individuals and corporations we know that there are many ‘shady’ financiers, some of whose funding comes from illicit sources and some of whom will give what turns out not to be real money but have gained real assets in exchange and then flown into thin air. The Caribbean has a few cases like that in the courts. But they too will want their conditions, often leverage, political access, and access to government contracts: we will see to what extent Allen Stanford was one of those.

    I think the dealings over CLICO/CL Financial contain a potential time bomb of contingent liabilities that will limit the government’s room for maneouvre, and these are not yet reflected in any debt statistics.

    Finally, on the ‘comfort’ that comes from having moved to more domestic debt financing. To me, the main advantage is that (like the US can), a country can print money to get out of a debt problem but there will ultimately be a price to pay for that. That should mean that the exchange rate should depreciate (as with the USD and the Pound currently) but with a fixed rate peg, the country will get stuck and the ‘pain’ will have to be borne elsewhere, often with unemployment. People need to understand that trade off.

  8. Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) Avatar
    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)

    @ Alex Fergusson // November 19, 2009 at 9:32 AM

    “The DLP did say all along that management of the economy was not important and that they will concentrate on social issues and leave the management of the economy to the public servants who were well trained.” [Anyone who took that seriously really does not understand how the world works, which may sadly mean a lot of people.]

    Take politics out of your analysis, unless you can show how the DLP itself ’caused’ unemployment. Look at the associated economic situation that went with those unemployment levels. I do not have figures to hand, but look for instance at what happened in say The Bahamas (more or less similar to Barbados in size and many aspects of economic structure and management), the US and UK for the same time periods. If the trend in Barbados was hugely divergent then you may be able to point the finger at the politicians. That approach also has its flaws but it also allows you to build or walk away from your case.


  9. Hello Dennis,

    Thank you for pointing to that link – I’ve never come across the site before.

  10. Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados) Avatar
    Dennis Jones (aka Living in Barbados)

    @RJH Adams

    Rawdon, you’re welcome. The site was launched this week; the PM had the honour of doing that.

    Keep up the great analyses on Capital Chronicle.


  11.  

    What is the matter Lowdown, the Nation editors barred you from citing you blog source? Woe to freedom of speech 🙂

    BTW a colun written in your own immitable style which features the Bio of the Barbados Broadcasting Athority would be hilarious:

    CLENNELL BYNOE (chairman), George Pilgrim, John Haynes, Rev. Kim Welch, Mr Devonish (Telecoms Unit) and Mr Callender (G.I.S.)

    THE LOWDOWN: Ain’t takin’ no bull

    Published on: 11/20/2009.

    BY RICHARD HOAD

    ACCORDING TO W.C. FIELDS, "there comes a time in the affairs of man when he must take the bull by the tail and face the situation". That was quoted in a recent blog discussion on "crunch time" for Barbados. I hope they don’t mean it literally. I ain’t takin’ no bull by the tail. Crunch or no crunch.

    Newish VOB Brass Tacks moderator Harry Husbands isn’t afraid to take the bull by the tail to get to the bottom of the homo scenario. If I understand his position, he has no problem with two hard-backed men living together as man and man and raising a child. I can’t believe anyone would wish such a fate on a Bajan boy.

    Fortunately, a new BBC station has opened right next to VOB and it’s easy to cut off moderators when they sicken your stomach. But I’m glad I didn’t ditch old Harry for I would’ve missed the gloom and doom of Dr A.D. Persaud, chairman of Intelligence Capital.

    Dr Persaud, who can be seen resplendent in striped shirt and blue tie all over the Internet, is fairly bubbling with dismay at the latest rating by two dudes aptly named Standard and Poor. S and P are one step away from calling us "Junk". Dr P warns we must avoid this at all costs.

    Taking an opposing view, again from the little I can understand in the debate, is Dr Don Marshall, a "senior fellow", who can be seen in an open-necked shirt in front of some bookshelves. His "very bold" suggestion is that the Barbados Defence Force be "bastardised".

    How selecting our soldiers only from among those whose parents aren’t married will help anything may not be quite clear to you out there, but don’t feel too bad about it. These are complicated matters. The important choice, as I see it, is between striped shirt and tie versus open-necked shirt. As one who hates ties, I’m backing Dr Don all the way.

    And I’m in good company. I’ve canvassed opinions from the monkeys who live down here, wood-doves, blackbirds, grass canaries, santapees, lizards, the two dogs and the cat. Not one is in the slightest worried about the economic downturn or Standard and Poor.

    Why are we mankinds, made in the image of God, worrying? I’ll tell you why. My boy Freundel said a mouthful recently: We’re mixing up our needs and our wants.

    Like Adam and Eve in the garden, we in this little paradise have only two needs: food and sex, or pudding and souse in colloquial termination. But through greed we have moved from Homo erectus (man with an erection) to Homo sapiens (sappy man) to Homo testudo (turtle man). Our endless baggage – house, car, clothes, ornamentation – has become so part of us we feel life would end without them.

    It won’t. You know my story. Had a job with a big, big house. Got married. Got fired. Lived in a little tent. No house, no toilet, no nothing. Later moved to the splendour of an old Government bus. Best days of our lives.

    Trust me, Dr P, you haven’t lived until you bathe your naked wife ‘neath the starry skies with a garden hose. And she you. And soaping. And t’ing. Lord have mercy!

    S and P have it right. We are a "junk" economy. We slave to buy Chinese-made junk from the Americans. They get rich; we live in fear of being "downgraded". It’s time to tell them we ain’t taking no more bull. By the tail or anywhere else.

    Instead, let’s Step Out In Faith with Pamella Rudder’s Voices In Christ choir. I love that CD. It’s got life, hope, inspiration and good music. Great Christmas present.

    A good friend sends me emails saying God is only a "fictitious" belief. But God works for me. For instance, a secular, materialistic viewpoint would suggest I drop a broad hint that a CD endorsement like the one above is worth at least five Voices In Christ conkies (some still available) and maybe a plate of pelau.

    Instead, I’m content to labour and not to seek for any reward, save that of knowing I’m doing His gracious will.


  12. The crisis in barbados is the DLP. Here is why:

    Barbados has a debt to DGP ratio of some 8% and climbing out of control but which is neither being used for stimulus or stabilization.

    This is therefore a new era in recklessness and irresponsibility by the DLP, even by its standards

    What is the DLP doing to restore the balance between its entitlements programmes and enterprise creation?

    What is the DLP doing to protect the financial position of Barbados’ key producing enterprises so that when the recession lifts and demand resurges, this country’s production systems are able to respond?


  13. An issue of truth and judgment

    +++++++++++++++

    Locally, tourism receipts are down by $150 million but Prime Minister Thompson said recently that Barbados does not have a cashflow problem.

    Barbados borrowed US$150 million from T&T recently – their Central Bank should know.

    But here is what PM Manning in T&T told the world yersterday:

    “And may I say that whereas most countries are experiencing a shortage of cash in the domestic financial system, we in Trinidad and Tobago are battling against a liquidity problem, with the Central Bank having to intervene to keep matters on an even keel.” He added: “Our doors are open and we are willing to partner with foreign investors as long as their policies are in accord with that of the Government and are in the best interest of the people of T&T.”

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading