Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Terence Blackett

debtOn October 4th 1982, the IMF entered into standby arrangements with Barbados for the purchase of SDR’s to the tune of $31.87 million. During this 18 month structural adjustment program, Courtney Blackman (then Central Bank Governor) maintained that – “an exchange rate devaluation was discussed but not seriously contemplated.” (1989:62)

Again in 1991 a similar type IMF program was implemented which would have resulted in increased interest rates, massive layoffs in the public sectors and major cuts in public expenditure – the choice was clear that devaluation was not an option but that radical cuts were necessary to stave off a possible crisis of confidence in the public sector finances.

Just recently Christina Daseking, Deputy Division Chief for the Western Hemisphere Department of the IMF issued the following statement to Barbados officials in the Ministries of Finance and Economic Affairs, Labor, Transport, Social Care, and Foreign Trade, the Central Bank of Barbados, and representatives of the private sector and labor, and the Opposition BLP:

“With the government’s options constrained by high public debt and the exchange rate peg to the U.S. dollar, the mission recommended a coordinated policy response, involving the government, the Central Bank, and the social partners to share the burden of a necessary adjustment:

(1) fiscal policy should focus on creating space for targeted support to vulnerable groups, while bringing the public debt ratio on a firmly declining trend over the medium term;

(2) monetary policy should aim at containing future inflation expectations

(3) incomes policy should support fiscal and monetary policies by promoting wage moderation within the established tripartite framework, thereby preserving price stability and protecting employment; and

(4) financial sector policies should focus on further strengthening financial sector regulation and supervision and improving cross-border cooperation among regulators and supervisors.

The International Monetary Fund report (July 2008) anticipates that even with a deficit target of 2 ¼%, the overall public debt ratio will continue to rise over the medium-term.

So in the light of this stark evidence, it is recommended that an additional tightening of the primary fiscal balance by 4% points of GDP in the upcoming fiscal year 2010/2011 and greater fiscal prudence over the medium term to generate a public sector balance and reverse the trend in skyrocketing debt.

But how possible will this be given the culture of largesse and living above our means that is intrinsically etched into the psyche of Bajan society?

The impact that dwindling foreign reserves is having on our economy and the evaporating pool of financial resources to be borrowed by developing countries will be severest test the government will have to undergo right up to 2012 – with spiraling oil and food prices eroding consumer confidence and purchasing power.

David Thompson will be hard pressed to adjust high end wages accordingly, including the exorbitant bonuses being paid to greedy, “good-for-nothing” consultants, “fat-cats”, “banksters”, political lackeys and lobbyists who continue to pillage our public purse.

The Central Bank reports that Barbados’ point-to-point inflation rate for the period ending July 2008 was 10.2%, as compared to 3.9% recorded for the same period ending July 2007. Projections are that inflationary pressures will increase almost double to a possible 12.6% to 18% into 2010 through 2012.

At the same time, with airline cutbacks this winter into summer 2010, this dumming down in visitor numbers on the ground will precipitate a further economic slowdown in the Barbadian economy (hence further borrowing down the road) and the government ultimately going cap in hand to the IMF.

According to Caribbean Net News – “The Prime Minister of Barbados, David Thompson, has announced that he will seek a resolution in the House of Assembly to raise BDS$1 billion (US$500 million) to pay a number of the government’s outstanding bills. The money will be raised through the issuing of treasury bills, tax reserve and tax refund certificates…”

But with an increasingly weaker US dollar – what happens when those T-Bills, TRC’s and government bonds no longer have the strength of liquidity or the buyers to fund the government’s borrowing spree?

So as our economy slows even more, and the global financial outlook worsens, contrary to some popular opinions which are seeing “green shoots” and the bottoming out of the recession – the Barbados GDP is projected to slow to 1.2% in 2010/11 from 2.8% in 2008/09.

Our government’s policymakers will need to exercise cautious judgment and wisdom while giving way to “prudence” in its development objectives in the short-term, if it is to weather the global financial crisis and ensure long-term fiscal sustainability for all its people.

No one in their right mind would accept that our current levels of DEBT* is sustainable over the short, medium or long term. One further wave or rupture in the global economic market would literally send our economy reeling into a tailspin. Government must look seriously at cost-cutting and belt-tightening given the amount of wastage, misappropriation, and “squander-mania” that has gone on in the last decade.

It’s time for radical change…

The Barbados DEBT* Bubble: Is The Devaluation Of The Dollar Imminent? – Part I


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

76 responses to “The Barbados DEBT* Bubble: Is The Devaluation Of The Dollar Imminent? – Part II”


  1. Interesting Article ,

    But with the US dollar already on the downward spiral , to all intents and purposes the Barbados has been already devalued because its tied to the US dollar


  2. Actually there is no need to adjust salaries at the high end. Maybe a freeze.

    There is absolutely no reason to devalue the dollar either because people would suffer.

    Money is a paper value and book entries. It is created by man and can be accordingly adjusted. However, to adjust it downward would be to stake ourselves t0o far from the monetary centre and simply cause even more hardship.

    It is like the slave owner who lives in a big house with a family of five and huddles a dozen slaves into a 2 x 4 shack in the “outback” for economic reasons.


  3. Please stop talking about devaluation, devaluation!

    There is no advantage in devaluing the dollar.
    The theory of “cheaper exports” and therby an increase in foreign exchange inflows is a bad myth.
    For verification, you can check with the Latin America ecomonies, or better yet, our sister islands who went through this terrible ordeal and as yet – have not recovered.


  4. Read the article and found it interesting in the context we are happy to forget how economic decisions taken by our governments have other affects which can be very tangible. It maybe a boring article.

     

    September 9: Commentary – How Did Economists Blow It (Part 2)? They Missed the Negative Externalities of America’s Limited Liability Society

    Location: New York
    Author: Mark Sunshine

    Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009

    Paul Krugman’s New York Times Magazine article of September 6th maintains that externalities are the most important factor in market failures, but then never considers whether or not large “externalities” caused the failures of 2007.  By ignoring externalities, the usually brilliant Mr. Krugman illustrates why economists didn’t see the market crash and Great Recession.  The unintended and unrecognized effects of negative externalities were probably the largest factor that contributed to the summer of 2007crash, yet economists virtually ignore these cultural and sociological phenomena that almost resulted in economic seppuku. 

    Mr. Krugman wrote a single sentence about externalities when he said “…economists admitted that there were cases in which markets might fail, of which the most important was the case of “externalities” – costs that people impose on others without paying the price, like traffic congestion or pollution.” 

    According to Wikipedia (which has a pretty good article on externalities): “In economics, an externality or spillover of an economic transaction is an impact on a party that is not directly involved in the transaction.  In such a case, prices do not reflect the full costs…of production…or a product or services…In a competitive market, the existence of externalities would cause either too much or too little of the good to be produced or consumed…If there exists external costs such as pollution, the good will be overproduced by a competitive market, as the producer does not take into account the external costs when producing the good…economics has shown that the existence of externalities result in outcomes that are not socially optimal.” 

    A good web site for first year economics students, Tutor2u also has a description of externalities.  “Externalities are common in virtually every area of economic activity.  They are defined as third party (of spill-over) effects arising from the production and/or consumption of goods and services for which no appropriate compensation is paid…Externalities can cause market failure if the price mechanism does not take into account the full social costs and social benefits of production and consumption…This leads to the private optimum output being greater than the social optimum level of production. “

    A little bit of translation is needed at this point.  Bubbles are characterized by an unsustainable “over-production” or “over-consumption” of a good or service.  For example, the housing bubble was the over-production of homes to satisfy the over-consumption of housing by consumers.  First year economics students are taught that externalities are one way that bubbles are created.  The housing bubble is a text book example of production and consumption being greater than is socially optimal.  Sooner or later in most large negative externalities the true cost of production catches up with the market.  In the case of pollution, the environment becomes so polluted it cannot absorb any more discharge and production that is polluting must change.  In the case of housing, society couldn’t keep on subsidizing the cost of homeownership and the value of homes crashed. 

    Economists almost always cite the same examples of negative externalities that cause over-production of a good or service.  The examples that they look to are usually physical phenomena such as pollution, traffic, noise or crime.  These are externalities that are easy to measure and easy to quantify.  Everyone can understand that if a polluter doesn’t have to pay for the cost of his pollution, production costs will be understated and since the producer isn’t absorbing the full costs of production he will over-produce the item causing pollution above the socially optimal amount. 

    However, non-tangible externalities are tough to recognize, quantify and analyze.  For economists to understand non-tangible externalities, they need to be psychologists, sociologists, lawyers and behavioral experts.  These are social science disciplines that economists are notoriously bad at mastering and often considered beneath their position in academia. 

    Economists stopped worrying about the economics of externalities more than thirty years ago when they mastered the math of physical externalities.  Externalities aren’t considered a “sexy” topic for economics PhD candidates.  If an economist wants to get a good position in a desirable university or think tank he had better write a complicated paper based upon indecipherable mathematic models and formulas.  Focusing on soft topics like the nature and cost of creeping changes to our legal system or changes in the sociology of groups aren’t great topics for an ambitious economist. 

    Perhaps the biggest new externality of the last fifty years is the expansion of limited liability to almost all corners of our lives and business transactions.  Fifty years ago limited liability was a concept that was restricted to shareholders in corporations; i.e., the amount that that passive shareholders can lose from an investment in a corporation was the amount of their investment.  For example, if an investor buys stock in “Sunshine Widgets”, a hypothetical NYSE traded company, the maximum amount that the investor can lose is the cost of his stock.  The theory behind limited liability corporations is that it would be impossible to fund large corporations if passive shareholders were exposed to unlimited liability for losses incurred by management. 

    However, over the last fifty years limited liability has been expanded to all sorts of businesses, business owners, consumers and transactions.  Today it is culturally acceptable for people to walk away from their mistakes and have someone else pay for their losses.  Limited liability is the mother of all externalities and economists almost uniformly missed it. 

    Perhaps the biggest of all the limited liability externalities, is the limited liability of consumers when they finance homes.  Notwithstanding what the contracts say, homeowner liability is almost always limited to the amount of the down payment.  If the value of a homeowner’s house is less than the amount owed on the mortgage note, the homeowner can default his mortgage and walk away without paying the deficiency. 

    Lenders’ being financially responsible for bad homeowner decisions isn’t the way things used to be done in America.  When I was a child my parents taught me that our family had to pay to the bank the entire amount of our mortgage loan, no matter what.  American culture didn’t have exceptions to the rule that families had to pay back the bank.  Today, this is a quaint idea from a different time and place. 

    Limited liability for homeowners changed consumer behavior and encouraged over consumption of homes.  After all, if homeowners don’t have to live forever with a bad purchase decision or a failure to maintain their home, why rent.  Buying is a much better option in the age of limited liability.  This became especially true when required down payments shrank for many homeowners to about the same size as the amount that they would have to give to a landlord for first and last month’s rent and security deposits.  Economists missed this essential change and didn’t warn policy makers that modifications to public policy were needed to avoid a housing bubble. 

    But, our limited liability society doesn’t stop with mortgage debt.  Limited liability in commercial transactions has extended far beyond large corporations.  As a practical matter all sorts of non-corporate businesses and transactions have limited liability; even when business owners provide personal guarantees.  It doesn’t take long for commercial lenders to learn that personal guarantees are largely unenforceable in America.  Only the grossest frauds result in recourse being enforced.  As a result, the cost of business credit is higher, and the availability of business credit is more limited, than optimal.  In part because of shifting the cost of business failure from owners to lenders it shouldn’t shock anyone that most small business lending moved from banks to higher cost non-bank finance companies and now non-bank lenders are having trouble getting funded.  The unintended side effect of shrinking credit is contributing to the declining U.S. manufacturing sector and job losses. 

    The culture of limited liability has changed the financial services and banking industry.  The issues of too big to fail and moral hazard are nothing new.  But, in the bank and thrift crisis of the late 1980s bank managers, executives and board members were often held personally responsible for bank failures and FDIC losses.  The regulators looked at regulatory filings and reports to see if there were reporting errors or a failure to follow safe and sound banking principals.  Inevitably there were problems and the executives were held responsible for their mistakes.  Back in the 1980s and 1990s there were scores of criminal and civil prosecutions of banking executives and, not surprisingly, bank executives worked hard to avoid unsafe and unsound procedures that would cause failure.  This time around, there are almost no enforcement actions against officers and directors of failed banks.  The penalty for bank executives messing up is limited to losing their current job but does not include being banned from the industry, paying back past compensation or, in some cases, serving jail time.  Again, if economists were doing a good job they would have anticipated that the cost non-enforcement of bad employee behavior would result in more risky banks. 

    Unfortunately, economists are good at measuring physical things but not emotions, human nature or behavior.  When the economy blew a big housing bubble, economists assumed away the observed anomalies by concluding either that by definition bubbles can’t exists in a market economy or that the economy wasn’t operating in a logical or efficient manner.  When limited liability was expanded to small business it never occurred to economists to look at the secondary unintended effects of changed behavior and distribution of economic costs.  And, when the rules for bank officers and directors changed to limit their liability, economists failed to recognize that higher risk banks would result. 

    Even worse, it has never really occurred to economists that while their theories about efficient markets and logical behavior are pretty good, the fundamental application of these theories stinks because they do not understand American society and how it changes over time. 

    There are scores of externalities in the U.S. economy yet precious little work is being done to anticipate their costs and ramifications.  Inadvertently, Mr. Krugman accurately depicted the problem – he was correct when he stated that the biggest reason that markets fail to optimize behavior is externalities and then showed how economists blew it by ignoring the obvious problem of identifying current externalities.  Instead, he gave readers a history lesson in how economists assumed away observed behavior that they couldn’t explain instead of challenging the most basic of their underlying assumptions.  Of course, since most economists missed the existence of externalities, their analysis was irrelevant to actual events. 

    Economists that continue to assume away externalities do so at their peril.  While much of the time it will seem like they know what they are talking about, they will miss the most important trends, bubbles and movements of the U.S. economy.


  5. @ROK
    “There is absolutely no reason to devalue the dollar either because people would suffer.”
    *************************************
    I did not get the writer to be suggesting that devaluation would be a deliberate strategy by government. I got the impression that he is saying that we may be FORCED into devaluation.

    The article ends with “….Government must look seriously at cost-cutting and belt-tightening given the amount of wastage, misappropriation, and “squander-mania” that has gone on in the last decade.”

    What options are there for cost-cutting?

    -Reduce wages? …NO WAY – not after the negative PR when Sandi did it in the 90’s

    -Lay-offs? – HAH! They can’t even fire a few from the UDC which is a well known waste of funds.

    – Increased productivity? Not a chance! Not enough intelligence at management level in the place.

    The ONLY doable option may well be a devaluation of currency (an across the board pay cut) and since we have not the cajoles to take proactive steps to address the problems, then we will be left with the default, reactive, option.

    Here is a question for you ROK.

    When you look around in this world and compare, do you HONESTLY believe that we Bajans are productive enough to deserve the standard of living that we have enjoyed these last 40 years?

    …if you answer ‘NO’, then tell me exactly how much longer you think we con continue to live a lie….

    …if you say ‘YES’, then get your glasses checked and look again…


  6. @Bush Tea

    As you know we have discussed on BU the need for Barbados to change the way we do business to sustain our success. Despite the need to change we continue to hear what a great economist former Prime Minister Arthur was when in fact he did nothing to reorder the planks upon which our economy has been built.

    In the energy sector we have failed to develop and integrate renewable energy into our economy. We have failed to change our primary and secondary curriculums to produce citizens geared to be productive in the entrepreneurial and non-social disciplines. We continue to disproportionately invest in cricket when it is clear we need to develop our more mass-based sports which can provide greater opportunities for our youth. We need to look at our public sector and fast track some kind of project which will see technology being used to create more efficiency/information sharing…


  7. @ David,
    …but you must admit that we can talk real pretty though…LOL

    David, I did not want to be the one to break the following news about Barbados, I was hoping that some brighter spark – like GP, MME, BAFBFP, or your good self would have broken this news –

    Barbados has prospered over the past 5 decades – BY PURE LUCK!

    What Arthur what great economist what?!!
    Apart from free, universal education by EWB, we have just been lucky to have had the winds at our backs, and fortune on our side.

    In fact, the closest to an economic genius was probably Sandi, and I suspect that he did not know a debit from a credit…

    We have talked a lot, hired numerous consultants, copied many ideas, and largely done ZILCH!!

    ….you touched on some failures – how about:
    – Solid waste management – after Greenland and $100 m.

    – Sam Lords and Paradise both gone.

    – Beach lands all sold to foreigners who visit 3 weeks per year – and block our most valuable asset 24/7 – to everyone else.

    – Sugar Industry still in the 1970’s

    – Agriculture means importing produce ..or importing Guyanese to do it.

    – Our ‘National Bank’ belongs to people who compete with us.

    Our Telecommunications monopoly has no allegiance to our goals or interest ( so they downsize even while profitable)
    Our Electric Utility has no allegiance to our goals or interest. (so they will seek a rate hike at this time…)

    Our Water monopoly has been a complete shambles for over a decade now – and we are yet to even develop a PLAN to address this…

    Education is a farce – producing 70% failures and the other 30% trained for mendicancy.

    I can go on.

    Why, you may ask, do we enjoy such a high standard of living?

    – Because we have been spared the kind of traumas that every other country has experienced over the last 50 years.

    THAT’s IT!!

    …surely everyone knew that!

    If you are interested in WHY this has been the case, Bush Tea can tell you that the Big Boss Engineers have, from time to time CHOSEN to prepare specific individuals to perform specific roles at various times in history.
    Often, unique circumstances are prepared to facilitate the required environment for the nurturing of such chosen ones.

    GP would probably refer us to the nurturing of Moses in the very palace of the Pharaoh or of Joseph in Egypt (LOL, GP probably knows of far more exotic examples..)

    So David, don’t hold your breath waiting for good management from our leaders – just worry about how soon the ‘nurturing environment’ will be ended….

  8. Micro Mock Engineer Avatar
    Micro Mock Engineer

    “Barbados has prospered over the past 5 decades – BY PURE LUCK!”

    “Often, unique circumstances are prepared to facilitate the required environment for the nurturing of such chosen ones.”

    Man BT it is not like you to contradict yourself… which one is it luck or Divine ‘preparation’?


  9. (Putting on my anti-government hat),
    Isn’t it possible to improve public services
    whilst reducing public spending
    – stop wastage of money and resources
    – get rid of meaningless jobs and tasks
    – improve efficiency
    – use better technology


  10. @ MME
    Man BT it is not like you to contradict yourself
    **************************************
    …see why I like to leave these complex issues to REALLY bright people?!!

    A case of wearing two hats in the same post MME.

    From the perspective of good governance and management making a difference – pure luck! (no real management skills exhibited)

    In explaining why we have been ‘lucky’ – divine intervention….

    …but you very scarce of late MME?!! what happen? cat got your keyboard? …or just awed by the relentless evidence of imminent ‘end-of-term’?

    @Kiki
    All those things are possible….
    In a dream, or a children’s movie.


  11. Industries do it all the time (in the real world)
    i.e. Budget and Head count chops
    e.g. Get rid of 50% staff and give the rest twice the work


  12. Did we hear Prime Minister Thompson in the news stating definitively he cannot contemplate Barbados drawing down on any arrangements from the IMF other than what we are entitled?

    @Kiki

    If the government runs things on a business model what do you think will happen?


  13. I’m not suggesting American Capitalism for the Government model. Key social services like health care and education need to be improved, but with less money you spend wiser, plan better and cut out all the dead wood.


  14. @Kiki

    Understand your point but to achieve any improvement to the current model which all agree is inefficient would it not call for the implementation of some kind of business model?

    To implement a business model what do you see to be the challenges?


  15. Cuts in public spending is preferable to tax rises and government debt. The government needs to make tough choices how to cut public spending without cutting jobs and services, or slowing down economic recovery.


  16. @Terence Blackett…

    I support strongly your last paragraph in your above, ending with the sentence: “Government must look seriously at cost-cutting and belt-tightening given the amount of wastage, misappropriation, and “squander-mania” that has gone on in the last decade.

    And to reflect “kiki’s” immediate above…

    We live now in a very strange world, where unsustainable actions and behaviour are nominal… (Borrowing from our children.)

    What we need here in Barbados, and throughout the world, is sustainable behaviour, actions, policy and governence.

    Unfortunately, that involves change from the “same-old, same old” patterns that we’ve all fallen into. Change is rarely welcomed…

    Some live “high on the hog”, benefiting from unsustainable behaviour. Others simply “get by”, doing little work but still getting paid…

    IMHO, Barbados is a *tiny* country; we Bajans are a *tiny* population. Barbados would be considered a small city in any developed nation. As an analogy, we are krill amongst whales…

    Greater efficiency, and more effort by *everyone* (and perhaps some sacrifice and pain by those who are currently riding high), is the only thing which will save us. (IMHO.)

    Are we up to it?

    Probably not….


  17. @BUSHTEA
    “The ONLY doable option may well be a devaluation of currency (an across the board pay cut) and since we have not the cajoles to take proactive steps to address the problems, then we will be left with the default, reactive, option.”

    YES Bushtea, this maybe the eventual outcome or as some elude – “the last resort or sorts”…

    But this doesn’t have to be…

    David Thompson has to go to work with a scalpel,trimming excess, waste and “fat” from the beast that is Barbados government…. Money is spent exorbitantly on all kinds of weird and wonderful things where “cost” over-runs balloons out of control and the taxpayer is left holding the bag…

    Errol Barrow showed us what a lean, mean, “fighting in the public good” machine government can be…And he didn’t have the financial instruments we have today…

    So what is our excuse?

    Don’t tell me these “buggers” can’t pull this thing around…

    It time politicians did some “bloody” work instead of sitting up in their plush offices, having 3 hour lunches, “shagging” their P.A’s, playing golf when they should be attending to their constituents’ needs, but above all, living it up in the lap of luxury, while their snouts are in the trough of the public purse, jet-setting around the world in their $1000 suits…

    Too much shenanigans, too much fluff and fanfare going in a country that is for all intents and purposes – “BROKE”!!!

    If this is the case, then why are they in power?


  18. @CHRISTOPHER HALSALL
    “We live now in a very strange world, where unsustainable actions and behaviour are nominal… (Borrowing from our children.)”

    Hey Chris, can you tell me why your kids and grandkids is suppose to pick up the bill for gross indulgences and neglect of duty created by an era of politicians who were hellbent on party politics instead of the public good?


  19. @Terence: “…can you tell me why your kids and grandkids is suppose to pick up the bill for gross indulgences and neglect of duty created by an era of politicians who were hellbent on party politics instead of the public good?

    There is a very particular reason why I personally have never let my genes procreate (you must be careful of those Selfish Genes…).

    But to speak to your question directly and at the same time in the general…

    There is absolutely *no* excuse for those who come after us to have to clean up after us.

    We all are fouling the commons… For the benefit of the few, to the detriment of the many (and, even worse, to the many future many)….

    (The triple usage of “many” immediately above is considered and intentional.)


  20. The end times may be at hand, but the beneficiaries may not be those of GP’s virtuosity or even BT’s characteristics but those chosen few who will survive the meltdown to come, are those whom will be selected by the destroyers themselves.
    Same as it ever was.

    Pray to GP’s God, rapidly develop BT’s character or put your faith in the powers that be (eh!), crunch time is nigh and the time for vacillation has run out.

    The green shoots are Soylent.


  21. @ kiki // September 14, 2009 at 11:08 AM

    You stated quote….”Cuts in public spending is preferable to tax rises and government debt. The government needs to make tough choices how to cut public spending without cutting jobs and services, or slowing down economic recovery.”

    I reply…. I agree with you wholeheartedly

    @David

    Here are some examples of excessive/needless government spending…… Pass by MPW, formerly MTW, whatever it’s called now and take note of all the equipment parked up there, in some cases, for months/years all for the want of some simple repairs/parts, for instance, maybe a battery or perhaps brake system repairs! Why can’t effective repairs be done? No, the idea is just park it and we’ll BUY another one! “THE GOVERNMENT” got nuff money!! Newsflash….”THE GOVERNMENT” never had and will never have money! That’s taxpayers money we talking about! Your money & my money!! Then pass by the Transport Board and you will witness some of the same.
    Look at the vehicles driven by a lot of Ministers and other government officials….on such a limited economy as Barbados can these be afforded? Do we really need all this extravagance? I remember the days when Errol Barrow used to drive M 50 (a white Toyota) all over Barbados on official business or not.
    Look at all the unnecessary travel by groups to overseas “meetings” (shopping trips, perhaps?) If a trip overseas is necessary do they all have to travel 1st class? Is it necassary to send so many people to one “meeting”? In this day and age why can’t we see more video conferencing as opposed to all this travel?
    Why is it necessary to have 10 people change one light bulb in Barbados? What I mean to say is that very often you will see 8 or 10 people on a job and only one or two actually doing any work and the rest looking on? Paid spectators, perhaps.
    What I am trying to say here is that there are ample opportunities for cost-cutting if a lot of aspects are looked at carefully


  22. @BU Family…

    So, it turns out I no longer need any of you…

    I have in the last half hour received an email telling me that I am the sole long-lost beneficiary of someone who died recently who was worth 100 million… (I only have to give all my personal details, and pay USD $200, in order to collect $50 million)….

    Even better, I’ve also received an email offering to extend my dick by three inches! (Money back guaranteed.)

    Wow. Who could turn down such wonderful (and, obviously, honest) offers???

    (ROTFL….)


  23. @CHRISTOPHER HALSALL

    “TOUCHE”….

    Your emails says it all….

    Hello world!!!!


  24. @Straight Talk
    “The green shoots are Soylent.”

    Your futuristic analogy is rather OMINOUS!!!

    On the anniversary of the collapse of LEHMAN BROTHERS and the first day of the Jewish New Year (Roshashana) the world ebbs and flows as it meanders towards an uncertain future…

    Politicians are CLUELESS!!! Religious leaders are controlled by the “Evil One” and don’t know it!!! Science – a force for great good, has become a silent, sentient “god” where its followers pray and worship at the altar of Carl Sagan – while they wash their faces in an act of purification and genuflect in front of their technology and bow to the will of Landrew.

    The world is in a crisis and many of us know it – but denial is best form of defense.

    The ‘ole cliche – “if you build it, they will come” – has relevance but where is the logic in building castles in the sky without putting foundations under them….

    One year on from a global meltdown in the financial markets and NOBODY* is seriously dealing with the $400 TRILLION in DEBT we face or as CHRIS H. alluded to that our kids will be cleaning up long after we are gone…

    I particular like BILL BONNER’s words today on Lehman’s anniversary:

    “Yes, Wall Street has a good gig going. The whole industry now benefits from the hedge fund formula – ‘heads I win, tails somebody else loses.’ When the hedge funds play the game, it’s their clients who lose money. But the way Wall Street banks play it, the big loser is the US government directly, and US taxpayers and bondholders indirectly.”

    “When the going is good, the bankers make millions in profits – which they take home as salary and bonuses. An analyst at JPMorgan estimates that American and European banks will pay their 141,000 investment banking employees $77 billion in 2011…or about $543,000 per employee. Since they pay out so much of what they earn, they lack the capital to survive a crisis. But when they’re threatened with extinction, the feds step in to bail them out. No wonder they have no fear of a meltdown…”

    “We suspect that there’s a long trip ahead of us too. We have begun the process of reversing a half-century of credit expansion. Since 1945, debt per person has increased. Now it is decreasing – with vast consequences. If we’re right, the financial sector will shrink for many years. Profits will be hard to come by. A job will be difficult to get too. And the part of the world dominated by Anglo-Saxons will diminish….”


  25. Chris Halsall,
    ‘…….to extend my dick by three inches’.

    Now why would you want dat poor innocent ‘ting’ raking on de ground? Not fair a’ tall.


  26. Bonny I doubt Chris is that short

    I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT I AM AGREEING WITH THE GUY FROM SHERWOOD FOREST 100%. I must be coming down with something..!

    Chris H
    “Greater efficiency, and more effort by *everyone* (and perhaps some sacrifice and pain by those who are currently riding high), is the only thing which will save us. (IMHO.)”

    Fantastic words. But how do you measure the efficiency of those whose output cannot be measured; the people who are paid for the “responsibility that they hold” or are paid to “keep them honest”… the high price operatives in both Government and the Private Sector?

    So here is my idea (The Bushman put me up dey wid a big up Cardiologist and a structural engineer so I gun ease my way back down to the level of the ordinary). It is not possible to measure the output of a $12,000.00 PS or consultant so you simply ask them to continue what they are doing, nothing more or less since it cannot be measured just maintain their present habits. Now what you do change is the input which is the $12,000.00. Since efficiency like productivity is a measure that gives the comparison between output and input, by reducing the input and keeping the output constant, the efficiency will be improved. What Chris is asking therefore is that salaries of the non-productive members of society be docked.. and I am for that 100%


  27. @BAFBFP…

    We seem to find ourselves on the same page…

    @Bonny Peppa…

    Thanks for your kinds words, but I really am rather short….


  28. @BAFBFP // September 14, 2009 at 11:02 PM

    “I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT I AM AGREEING WITH THE GUY FROM SHERWOOD FOREST 100%. I must be coming down with something..!”

    So, refresh muh memory nah! Wuh hexactly yuh ‘greein wid muh bout??


  29. RH. I ain’ feeling well it appears so don’ bodder wid wah I say.


  30. @BAFBFP: “But how do you measure the efficiency of those whose output cannot be measured; the people who are paid for the “responsibility that they hold” or are paid to “keep them honest”… the high price operatives in both Government and the Private Sector?

    It is my opinion that except for some very rarefied domains of physics, *everything* can be measured, compared and analysed.

    As an example, Barbados Light and Power (BL&P) (an extremely effecient Company) is about to be brought before the Barbados Fair Trading Commission (FTC) to be heavily scrutinized to justify their request for a rate increase.

    Meanwhile, Bajans are currently reeling from the rate increase granted to the Barbados Water Authority (BWA) arbitrarily mandated by the Minister Responsible for same.

    Did the BWA go before the FTC?

    No.

    Why? Because the BWA wasn’t “ready” to be so scrutinized…

    BL&P is a for-profit company.

    BWA is a Government entity.

    Which is doing a better job?

    Hmmm….


  31. @CHRISTOPHER HALSALL

    “Barbados Light and Power (BL&P) (an extremely efficient Company) is about to be brought before the Barbados Fair Trading Commission (FTC) to be heavily scrutinized to justify their request for a rate increase….”

    “Bajans are currently reeling from the rate increase granted to the Barbados Water Authority (BWA) arbitrarily mandated by the Minister Responsible for same…”

    YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!!!

    Government should be saying to Light & Power that energy prices has fallen since last year from $150 a barrel – so why is utility costs escalating???

    Is this the same bogus argument of investment in greener renewable technologies?

    PLEASE!!!

    It is time for the government to legislate solar technology as a means of electricity generation for every home in Barbados…

    Hey Chris, maybe this is a viable niche business opportunity we can look at?

    SERIOUSLY!!!

    As for BWA – why don’t these “suckers” pursue SHELL* for millions of dollars based on the jet fuel leak at Gibbons Boggs almost 15 years ago that still is an environmental nightmare waiting to happen???

    Some of us thought that Barbados was an inexhaustible perma basin of fresh, cool, filtered through coral limestone running water… That maybe doubtful!!!

    Is desalination somewhere in our near future?


  32. @Mr. Blackett: “YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!!!

    I am almost always serious. This one of the reasons I’m not much fun at parties. (One of the other reasons is I can’t dance.)

    Mr. Blackett: “Government should be saying to Light & Power that energy prices has fallen since last year from $150 a barrel – so why is utility costs escalating???

    You do understand how the “fuel adjustment charge” works. Right?

    BL&P’s rate is set based upon their costs, capital requirements, and investor’s expectations.

    Fuel costs are entirely separate. (An ingenious solution, IMHO.)

    With regards to BWA…

    It might be good if they could actually figure out what meters were assigned to each consumer…

    And to collect on their accounts…

    It might also be a good thing if many of the senior managers didn’t disappear for most of the day. Each and every day…

    We talked about “measurements”. The BWA would be an excellent test case for measuring what *everyone* in that organization was doing….


  33. @Mr. Blackett: “It is time for the government to legislate solar technology as a means of electricity generation for every home in Barbados…

    I agree entirely…

    However, please note that the FTC, during the “Issues Conference” of the BL&P Rate hearing, stated that renewables were not to be discussed during the upcoming hearing….


  34. @CHRISTOPHER HALSALL
    “However, please note that the FTC, during the “Issues Conference” of the BL&P Rate hearing, stated that renewables were not to be discussed during the upcoming hearing….”

    CHRIS – YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!!!

    This is MADNESS!!!

    So what are you saying BRUV* – if we were looking for government support to import solar technology out of CHINA* to out fit every home in Barbados for as little as $8000 which would mean that we would generate enough electricity that we could resell to LIGHT & POWER for them to utilize for commercial purposes driving down the cost of this important utility…

    “It might be good if they could actually figure out what meters were assigned to each consumer…And to collect on their accounts…It might also be a good thing if many of the senior managers didn’t disappear for most of the day. Each and every day…

    “Shiver me timbers”….

    CHRIS*- why is the corporate infantile paralysis at BWA still allowed to fester after decades of crippled mismanagement, tomfoolery and sheer asinine behaviour on the part of a government department which is NOT* fit for purpose???

    Holy CRAP!!!


  35. @Mr. Blackett… I know I’m now beating a dead horse…

    But…

    It is interesting to note that BL&P has been awaiting approval from the Government of Barbados to invest in and build a “wind farm” for *years*.

    Town and Country Planning???


  36. @Mr. Blackett… I’m beginning to feel that I’m the “serious man”, in a serious man / funny man stage show…

    You raise serious questions above.

    I cannot provide answers…

    Others “in power” might, however (perhaps, however, only when a workable FOIA is enacted)….


  37. @CHRISTOPHER HALSALL

    Hey Chris, I have a QUESTION for you….

    Why aren’t you in the vanguard of political leadership in our country?

    GUYS* like YOU*, DAVID*, ROK * and others are critical to the future direction of our country…

    You guys are NOT* short of ideas… Your mental factories produce day in- day- out … Why should this kind gravitas fall by the wayside or on deaf ears when elected politicians are simply bankrupt of ideas to turn around our economy and the general ETHOS* and direction of our country…

    Enlighten me BRUV*…


  38. @Mr. Blacket…

    Thank you for your kind words above…

    But to speak to your question directly…

    We are not in the “vanguard of political leadership” because we’ve made a few fatal mistakes:

    1. We call things the way we see them…

    2. We’re not willing to not call things the the way we see them.

    3. We’re not willing to be bought.

    4. We’re willing to take risks.

    The above is just not done any more.

    And so, we do what we can. In the hopes that perhaps our minor efforts in Identifying the Elephants in the Room might have an effect….


  39. Having read the discussions following the article above, I am impressed by the “Fortress of Solitude” mentality Barbados has settled into after many decades of small minded corruption of personal integrity disseminated throughout the hierarchy of government. How wonderfully stereotypical of this Caribbean nation!

    As a Canadian observer, it occurs to me that a ‘nuvo riche’ alternative minded individual might actually be able to purchase Barbados with some well placed cash; and proceed to demonstrate for the globe what a self motivated pro-active political establishment might accomplish in such a beautiful setting with such wonderful resource potential.


  40. @CHRISTOPHER HALSALL
    ” 1. We call things the way we see them…

    2. We’re not willing to not call things the the way we see them.

    3. We’re not willing to be bought.

    4. We’re willing to take risks.

    The above is just not done any more.
    And so, we do what we can. In the hopes that perhaps our minor efforts in Identifying the Elephants in the Room might have an effect….”

    So CHRIS, what can be done to avert a collapse in our dollar?

    Has the government bowed to the inevitable?

    Is it merely a matter of time?

    Larry Eldeson argued today that –
    “if every American family could save five percent of their income year after year … and even assuming every single penny of that savings was thrown into the pot to pay off Washington’s debt … Each American family — and descendants — would have to toil for the next 429 years!”

    Cheng Siwei, the former vice chairman of China’s Standing Committee, warned in the London Telegraph newspaper that concern is rising, and rising fast. He said –
    “If [the Fed] keeps printing money to buy bonds it will lead to inflation, and after a year or two the dollar will fall hard. Most of our foreign reserves are in U.S. bonds and this is very difficult to change, so we will diversify incremental reserves into Euros, yen, and other currencies.”

    So CHRIS* – surely our government sees the writing on the wall?


  41. Terrence is pointing out something I noticed already. There may be no need to devalue the Barbados currency if it is tied to the good ship US$ Inflation.


  42. @MoweSlowley
    “it occurs to me that a ‘nuvo riche’ alternative minded individual might actually be able to purchase Barbados…”

    Sorry to burst your bubble – but Barbados has already gone to the highest bidder…

    Don’t forget the ‘ole maxim – the borrower is servant to the LENDER*”…


  43. @Terence M. Blackett: “surely our government sees the writing on the wall?

    Yeah… No…

    You see, the World is going to end soon. So says The Book…

    So, therefore, there is no need to consider the future, since there is to be no future…

    Gods forbid if they are wrong….


  44. @ Terence..

    Don choo feel too sorry for me bud… I am an entrepreneur, and as such have a crown of bubble busters orbiting around me at any given moment. This system is actually incorporated into my business model, and I have all of Lawrence Welk’s old stage equipment for backup.


  45. @MoweSlowley

    Here’s another snipet of Larry Edelson article:-

    “The last thing Bernanke or President Obama want right now is a strong dollar. WHY have Obama and Bernanke failed to come to the greenback’s defense? Why is Washington continuing to spend, borrow and print knowing that by doing so they are, in effect, declaring war on the U.S. dollar?”

    Simple: THEY HAVE NO CHOICE!

    Consider these facts:

    “The U.S. government’s official debt is at an all-time high of $11.8 trillion. Every year, Washington has to make a staggering $335.3 billion in interest payments just to avoid default on that debt. In fact, just the interest on the national debt now equals 12% of all federal spending.”

    “The Federal Reserve is also in hock up to its eyeballs — the liabilities on its balance sheet have DOUBLED — from $1.2 trillion a year ago to more than $2 trillion today.”

    “Most terrifying of all — especially with the first wave of almost 4 million baby boomers reaching retirement age this year — unfunded government IOUs are coming due on Social Security, Medicare, and Federal pension payments. Those obligations are enormous: An estimated $104 TRILLION.”

    “We are now the single most indebted nation in the history of the planet. We owe more to foreign investors, retirees and ordinary citizens than we could ever hope to repay.”

    And that’s not the half of it:

    “Washington will add an all-time record $1.8 trillion to the national debt, pushing our budget deficits to almost 13% of GDP.”

    “This year and every year for the foreseeable future, Washington will have to borrow 80% of the world’s surplus savings just to pay its bills!
    Gutting the dollar is the ONLY way
    Washington can hope to survive
    this massive debt catastrophe.”

    “Destroying the value of our nation’s currency is the insidious, cynical trick governments the world over have always used when skyrocketing deficits and debt threatened the collapse of their economies.”

    “This last-ditch strategy has been used many times before — in Brazil … Russia … Argentina … France … Australia … the UK and more.”

    It’s even happened before right here in the United States:

    “In 1933 — when President Franklin Roosevelt and Fed Chief Eugene Black intentionally devalued the dollar in an attempt to re-ignite the economy.”

    It’s the historical desperation move of last resort:

    “FIRST, governments spend, borrow and print money wildly over many decades to fund programs aimed at keeping the voters happy …”

    “SECOND, when the debt burden begins to crush their economies, governments then borrow and print even more wildly in a doomed attempt to spend their way out of the debt crisis they created, and …”

    “THIRD, when the government’s debts grow too large to repay — or when paying the interest on that debt becomes too burdensome — they intentionally debase their own currencies in an attempt to service and repay their debt with cheaper money.”

    “This time around, I’m calling it
    “Bernanke’s Secret Debt Solution”
    — and it is already happening. ”

    “Right now; before our very eyes.
    Every time a government employs this strategy, its people suffer. Economic growth continues to suffer. Spending power plunges and the cost of living soars. Bankruptcies skyrocket. Savings are wiped out in the blink of an eye.”

    “Please don’t get me wrong. When a nation’s economy is in as much trouble as ours, there’s not much else the government can do to pull itself out of it. So what Bernanke is doing is inevitable.”

    “But HOW he’s doing it — keeping virtually all Americans in the dark, with no chance to protect themselves from the inevitable financial fallout — is utterly unconscionable.”

    The Question of the Day:

    “What can we do to help you
    protect yourself and profit
    from Washington’s insidious scheme
    to crush the dollar?”

    “As I pointed out earlier, this is NOT a forecast. It is already happening. You can see it in the historic plunge of the U.S. dollar against the euro, the British pound and other currencies. And you can see it on a very personal level every month as your dollars buy less; your cost of living soars.”

    “The worst part is that this great debasement of the U.S. dollar is still in its early stages. Washington’s record-shattering deficits … off-the-charts borrowing by the U.S. Treasury … and run-away money-printing at the Fed you’re seeing right now — all virtually guarantee that the declines in the greenback’s buying power we’ve seen so far are only a dress rehearsal for the dollar disaster to come.”

    “This intentional destruction of our incomes, our savings, our investments and our retirements is far and away the greatest, most personal financial crisis any of us will ever have to deal with….”


  46. The world comes to an end everyday.

    The end of which you speak has been a preoccupation of some for centuries.

    When people saw the first aeroplane, many thought that it was the end of the world.

    When there is a hurricane due, many feel as though that is the end of the world.

    DLP lose an election; BLP lose an election; Plastic Bag lose the crown; a Black man achieves something; a cloudy day-

    You name it


  47. @KISSMYA: “The world comes to an end everyday.

    Agreed.

    But, sadly, many of our “Leaders” plan all our futures with an implicit Belief that current debts and exposures need not be repaid…

    At least, not during their watch….


  48. I knew there was a reason I got all this Lawrence Welk stage equipment so cheap. You guys are telling me the market for bubbles is crashing?

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090914111825.htm

    How can this object avoid hitting Jove after falling back around the leading Lagrange point?

    Maybe the lack of foresight among short term politicians is generating some weird gravitational mechanics? Think we could take some bets from E.T. and win our money back?

    I tell you, this Comet reminds me of our global financial markets. There must be a relationship! Politicians would have to be crazy to miss the opportunity to gamble on such a solid assumption!


  49. @Chris Halsall

    “We call things the way we see them”
    …”Barbados Light and Power (BL&P) (is) an extremely effecient Company”

    My God.. Who is your optometrist, he should be shot on sight!


  50. The BL&P is a M O N O P O L Y. The fact that it has not had a rate hike in over 20 years should suggest to the simplest of citizens that for a very long time we were all over charged!

    What the BL%P needs is to be N A T I O N A L I S E D.

    I can not believe that you are acting as an intervener and making claims like that..!

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading