Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

arable-landBloggers around the world are being asked  to take action to combat the poverty and hunger affecting more than 500 million people worldwide and responsible for the deaths of over 15 million children each year through a campaign Blogger Unite For Hunger and Hope. BU although concerned about people everywhere the campaign (blogging)  has served to bring to the fore again the little regard Barbadians have for agriculture and by extension food security.

BU commenter Nostradamus reminded us recently that there is an application in Town Planning to change 136 acres of agricultural land, representing 30% of Staple Grove Plantation, from agricultural to residentialthere will be a Consultation at the Meeting Hall of St. David’s Anglican Church on Monday April 27, 2009 at 6:00pm. The meeting will allow for comment and discussion on the proposed plans for the subdivision of lands at St. David’s Village, Ch. Ch and Staple grove Ch. Ch. Into lots for residential purposes.

The government led by Minister Michael Lashley has been on a quest to generate housing solutions to deliver on a Democratic Labour Party campaign promise. The government led by Minister Haynesley Benn has also been on a quest to move agriculture back to the centre of our economy. The two Ministers maybe on a collision course given all that has happened during the previous government when there were many accusations levelled that prime agricultural land was being sub-divided willy-nilly for residential and other purposes.

In light of the above BU’s interest was peeked when commenter Nostradamus made his intervention.  Luckily we were able to persuade a BU family member to attend the Consultation on the sub-division of lands at Staple Grove, St. Davids for residential purposes and report back her findings.

Barbadians are aware that Staple Grove Plantation which stretches from Edey Village to Kent runs almost parallel to the St. George Valley. The significance is that these lands represent the most prime agricultural lands in Barbados perhaps with the exception of those in the St. Thomas belt. The idea that approximately 144 acres is proposed to be sub-divided in the first instance by developer PDS Inc only serves to make some of us hold our bellies and bawl.

The Consultation was attended by about 40-50 people which included officials from Town Planning, Developers etc. The group although small was very vociferous in feedback when time for Q&As.

Here are some of the issues raised as recalled because note taking was not advised:

  1. When asked to reveal who the developers PDS Inc the presenter suggested that those interested should scan the environmental impact assessment (EIA) document located in St. David’s Church for viewing by the public, or request a search at the corporate registry. This was not received too kindly. In fairness to the presenter when referring to the developers he would throw his hands in a certain direction in the room and as luck would have it our BU family member is 99% sure that the three gentlemen sitting at the back of the room Mr. Om Prakash, Suleman Nana and one other unrecognizable man, although his face was familiar Barbadian who works in tourism of Indian descent.
  2. The issue of water to serve such a large residential area was raised by residents from the area. Based on feedback water outages is already being suffered by residents of the St. Davids area. The presenters of the EIA assured residents that the Barbados Water Authority (BWA) has promised that water will be pumped from surrounding reservoirs like Rising Sun and others. Again this was not received well by the small gathering and some loudly expressed a lack of confidence in the BWA to deliver. A suggestion was made that a water solution should be in place before Town Planning submits its recommendation for approval to the Minister.
  3. The issue of the St. David’s main road which separates the school and the church was thought to be inadequate and should be widened before approval is recommended by the Town Planning department to the Minister.
  4. Dust and smell pollution produced by a Chicken Farm and Asphalt Company to the East of the proposed residential area was suggested as a potential negative. The presenter (who compiled the EIA) indicated that the two entities fell outside the impact zone identified by Town Planning department for EIA.
  5. A resident suggested that the proposed 800+ houses to be built on 140 acres was a bit tight. The presenter indicated that a 2 acre area would be allocated as a recreational area for the residents.
  6. There was the suggestion that the EIA document should be available to any member of the public for a fee (cost) and published on the Internet for all to review.
  7. Scepticism was expressed that feedback from the group would be seriously considered because at the end of the process the Minister had the final say i.e. he could overrule the Town Planner if he wanted.

The above represent several of the points raised from recall.

It is interesting to note that between 2004-2005 several applications, residential and commercial were approved by the former government to build in the general area of Staple Grove in St. Davids  – People’s Cathedral, St. David’s Primary School, National Housing Corporation (93 lots) and several others.

Of concern to BU is the promise by government when on the campaign trail that given the need to curb the carving up of arable land to supply housing high-rise solutions would be considered. So far we have not read or heard Town Planning and by extension government pressuring developers to produce high rise solutions.

We are also concerned that Staple Grove plantation which owns some of the most arable land in Barbados is being sacrificed to housing without a fight.

We are also concerned that a major residential/commercial development for the area is being considered for approval in the absence of a well thought out amenities infrastructure.

We are also concerned that several St. Davids residents own 3-4 acre lands which they have been unable to get approval. This information came out in the survey commissioned as part of the EIA.

Recently Sir Othniel ‘Cow’ Williams announced that he would be building 100 houses in St. John. How is it these large developers are able to get approval to sub-divide but small people cannot?

How come PDS Inc feels so confident that they can apply for permission to cut-up Staple Grove plantation which is some of the most arable land in Barbados?


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

57 responses to “A Case Of The Fatted Calf Being Slaughtered?”


  1. Sweethear deal for campaign contributions. But will money be there for you when you retire:

    When will little old ladies get their pension cheques from the NIS?

    How can the NIS spend $400 million to build two buildings at Warrens but the same NIS cannot give old ladies their pension cheques?

    Why put money in buildings/mortgage (6% return) instead of Government Paper (7.5%+)

    Will Jada and Rotherley use the land as equity in those two building the government is building at Warrens?

    What is the amount Jada and Rotherley now pay in land tax for the land at Warrens?

    Will they get income from leasing the land and how much will it be per month/year.

    Will it be a profit (sweetheart deal) when compared to the amount they would otherwise have been required to pay in land tax?


  2. Thanks BU, your concerns are WELL founded. Several commentators give praise to the current Chief Town Planner, Mr. Cummins and his strong professional stance when it comes to his job. Hopefully, plans for his removal don’t come true. I must confess I have not seen the Staple Grove/St. David’s EIA and since I cannot get to the church I hope someone can direct me where I can get an electronic copy.
    Now on to business, two points you raise are somewhat within my line-of-sight: I am going to reverse the order because I have a comment for Donald Duck, Esq., WIV and John on a connected point.
    Point #5
    “A resident suggested that the proposed 800+ houses to be built on 140 acres was a bit tight. The presenter indicated that a 2 acre area would be allocated as a recreational area for the residents.”
    The current PDP (Barbados Physical Development Plan Amended 2003) have a very clear stipulation; as part of infrastructure planning for the island, the plan calls for about 4.57 acres for every 1000 residents to be set aside for recreation and open space. Very simple arithmetic (not advance calculus) dictates that it would take a lot more than 2 acres to comply with current Barbados law.
    Point #2
    “The issue of water to serve such a large residential area was raised by residents from the area…”
    The main problem here is that I don’t believe that TPCO or BWA have carried out a recent water quality survey for the island. There is a simple geologic fact; fresh water keeps out salt water. ALL of Barbados drinking water supply comes from underground reservoirs the higher the daily demand the lower the groundwater levels and the higher the chance of saltwater intrusion. ONCE SALT GETS INTO THE GROUNDWATER SUPPLY IT IS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO GET IT OUT.
    Has any one got comments on what is being done on the land opposite the entrance to Fort George.
    +++++++++++++++++++++
    @ Donald Duck, Esq., WIV and John
    Yes, John has made some very salient points in his comment. What is now Fort George was once Wildey and Upton plantations. We would ride or walk the entire area and your assessments are correct. There are some areas where holes and cracks are present in the coral cap. Also, if any of you lived in the area and had to dig a well, you would know exactly what I’m talking about. Once you break through the cap there is a lot of void space underneath, we call them ‘suck-holes.’


  3. @Mike Ashby

    We regret to inform you that in the year of our Lord 2009 the EIA is not available online.


  4. Mike Ashby, you want an electronic copy of the EIA. Are you crazy? That would mean that that a really wide cross section of the public and professionals would actually be able to peruse the document and make a valuable input. That’ s a “no no”.

    Excellent point about the amount of recreational area that the PDP 2003 requires to be set aside and what the developer is actually offering.

    Just goes to show the insights that might be offerd to the decision makers if they really and truly made the information widley available for comment.


  5. David, there was another EIA/ Public Meeting notice in the press this week about “Pickering Development “to discuss the proposed residential and commercial development at Pickering, St. Lucy”.

    Meeting is on June 10th, 2009 at 7:30pm at North Stars Cultural & Social Club, Crab Hill St. Lucy.

    Copy of EIA Available from May 11 to Tuesday June 09 at:

    TCPD Office Garrison
    North Stars Cultural & Social Club
    Post Office Bentham’s St. Lucy
    Police Station Crab Hill
    Speightstown Library

    Shouldn’t these notices give a sense of what the developments are about in a couple of sentences. For example the size/area the development will cover, number of houses etc.

    The notice should also be on the TCPD website with a summary of the development and the full EIA available for download. At a minimum they could make the executive summary available.


  6. Thanks D and N, I’m slowly coming to my senses. I was told that in Barbados we don’t do accountability, it look as though we don’t do transparency either.


  7. […] 31, 2009 · No Comments In a previous blog BU echoed the concern of many Barbadians regarding Town Planning approval given to several entities […]

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading