← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Sir Charles Williams
Sir Charles Williams

On the eve of the celebration of Martin Luther King Day in the USA to be followed by the inauguration in the USA of the first African American President, we were reminded in an email today that there is another group which has had to suffer the scourge of oppression and discrimination in our history.

In recent weeks all mankind, especially Blacks have been given renewed hope with the election of Barack Obama – hope springs eternal. If the Red Legs of Barbados have felt ignored over the years, we anticipate that they may have to feel comfortable in that position for a little while longer.

We hope not!

There is not a lot recorded to support good research of the life and times of the Red Legs in Barbados, another question we could pose to Sir Hilary Beckles by citing the relevance of the University of the West Indies. The most insight Barbadians get about the history of this group of people is from the eccentric and maligned Julian Charles Hunte. We have no doubt that Julian means well but his public image probably does little to further the cause of promoting the history of the Red Legs.

We hope the BU family finds the following article, reproduced from the Irish Times  interesting.

Reproduced from the Irish Times (17 January 2009)

I WAS DELIGHTED that Caroline Walsh focused on the plight of Ireland’s lost tribe, the Red Legs, in her article a couple of weeks ago on Barbados. This group, made up of the descendants of 50,000 Irish men and women who were sold into the white slave trade between 1652 and 1659, have been largely ignored, apart from in Seán O’Callaghan’s wonderful To Hell or Barbados: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ireland , published almost 20 years ago.

They were innocent Irish people who were rounded up from across the country by teams of Oliver Cromwell’s “man-catchers”, bound in chains and shipped to Barbados to work on sugar plantations.

Their descendants are still there today – some of them in absolute poverty – isolated, unassimilated and uneducated. It is about time we acknowledge them, our beleaguered kinsmen, innocent victims first of British injustice, then of landlord cruelty and now of our lack of interest.

I’ve wanted to go out and visit them for a long time, and perhaps make a documentary about them, but I was warned off by O’Callaghan’s stories of outsiders being driven away with hoes and pitchforks from the isolated, rundown settlements in which they live.

Thankfully, a braver group, Moondance Films, has made a documentary, which will be aired on TG4 soon. I’ll be intrigued to find out what it learned. So little known is about the Red Legs. Like any oppressed people, they were too focused on survival to have had the luxury of documenting their history. Their connection with Ireland was cut off many centuries ago; their surnames were taken from them and they were forbidden to practise their faith. Perhaps all that remains is their red hair, freckles and blue eyes.

Most accounts refer to their arrogance and alcoholism. One describes them as “lazy, worthless drunks of unworthy Irish/Scots origin, who have neither ambition nor intelligence, yet are white and proud. They believe they are a cursed people.”

Of course, some Red Leg families thrived when they were eventually emancipated, in 1834, when slavery was abolished. Illustrious island families such as the Mayers

and Goddards proudly trace their lineage back to slave ancestry, but most tend to be poorer than the black population. They farm smallholdings of sugar cane on the arid eastern coast of the island or live in Bridgetown, the capital, drinking in local grog shops or running white brothels for middle-class blacks.

I must stress that all of this is based mostly on rumour and on research done 20 years ago. We will know the truth only when TG4’s documentary is aired.

In the meantime what we know is that Cromwell decreed that troublemakers – the poor, the hungry, clergy and Catholic landlords who refused to move to Connacht – be sent to Barbados. They were herded south into holding pens in Cork and Waterford, then crammed into African slave ships in chains. One in five died en route; those who survived were scrubbed in readiness for the slave mart. The women – nuns, soldiers’ wives, Catholic gentry and teenagers – were stripped and checked for virginity. Good breeders were sold to studs, to make future slaves and brothel girls. The men were checked for muscle tone and strength of teeth, then branded with their owners’ initials.

Ironically, the Irish are now returning to Barbados, the elite of Ireland’s post-boom aristocracy – Desmond, Magnier, Smurfit, O’Reilly – converting old plantations into luxury resorts. Who knows how many of our ancestors were whipped to death right on the sites of these new pleasure palaces?


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

100 responses to “Red Legs in Barbados”


  1. Listen to – “To Hell or Barbados”

    On this very subject…

    http://community.cool-barbados.com/_To-Hell-Or-Barbados/audio/273850/68458.html


  2. Over the years living in Europe, I found a closer link between us West Indians and the Irish,probably due to our similar history. I had the pleasure of a few sojourns in Ireland ,North and was treated like a prince by these people, in a situation where I should have been rebuffed.


  3. Ireland is a great country with wonderful people. Have spent many pleasant days around Dublin and its environs.

    I have been told that the Bajan accent has much of County Cork in it.


  4. Dave, I’m normally, the last person on earth who’d be interested in pleading the cause of whites and I have n’t read the newspaper article above, however, I should like to request that we stop using the term ‘red-legs’ to describe people! I could n’t care less about the reason and origin for the term, it just sounds to me, so insulting, akin with our term of *igger!

    We can lead the way voluntarily, without needing to be asked by say, the UNO or similar body! The people themsleves, concerned may not feel able to ask but may, nonetheless, object strongly to its use!

    Let us set the example and abolish its use both on BU and BFP!!


  5. With the last comment I do agree – also red-man or “reds” too! In fact, in the early days of the USA, Irish were known as GREEN N***ERS – check “Irish Jam” with Eddie Griffin and “Gangs Of NY” with Day-Lewis and DiCaprio… Both made same historical reference. Google the term and see what pops up


  6. Let’s follow the Obama idea of unity among the races. However, though small, we in Barbados have a long way to go. Let’s stop calling each other by strange names, “red legs”, “coolies”, “nigger” etc. Time to move on, time to turn a new leaf. In doing so the whites MUST respect the blacks as the dominant race in this country and MUST be rewarded for their good work instead of promoting some white person who then has to learn from the same blacks how to do a job. Blacks MUST respect themselves and stop getting jealous and envious of each other and “bad talking” each other. The Indians and others of that race, MUST realise that they are in an adopted country and while we have in general open our doors to you, don’t try to take advantage of a situation as the same people who welcome you will forcefully get you out. In other words, you MUST merge with us bajans and accept us and eventually we would accept you. Don’t try forcing your culture down bajans’ throats. Oh My God, I’m talking about an Utopian Barbados; is this possible? Maybe I should stop dreaming, shut off my comp and return to bed and wake up afresh.


  7. All I can say is, BU upsetting de apple cart. Though all my days we were led to believe that only us blacks were brought here as slaves. Now we being shown another page in our history.

    The buffoons at Cave Hill ain’t gonna be pleased…….


  8. Just pasting something that came to my desk…

    “I dont know how many ‘pure’ red legs there are now. ? but there has been much misinformation re the populating of Barbados. I am NOT well versed in this history.

    It’s clear I THINK there would have been the well-to-do whites who came and established the plantations and I dont know who (living here in these days) are their offsping.

    But the little I’ve heard is…. there were also whites …like the Irish mentioned … and others … who were shipped here, in the circumstances described in the article.

    As the population of Barbados expanded, there were obviously those who bred with their own kind, and those who ‘stepped across’ and bred with “the others.” Hence the ‘muletoes’ in the first instances … half black / half white – like Obama) and then a thinning out of these as these mulotoes in turn bred with the blacks (producing a ‘high brown’ shade of black) … and with the whites, producing whites (like me) who have “a lick of the tar brush” …. etc. etc… These latter often called ‘Bajan white’ ‘Red’ … and so on….”


  9. I remember as a youth growing up when you drove down Newcastle Hill you were sure to see at least one or two (obviously) poor whites walking on the road or sitting on the steps of a roadside chattle house. I can’t recall the last time I have seen someone (in Newcastle or anywhere else in Barbados) you could identify right off the bat as a “poor white” in Barbados like you could in the past. That’s just my personal observation.


  10. dats because some of the prominent poor whites rich now lol

    e.g seale williams goddards lol

    many poor whites migrated to NZ and Australia in the 60’s too


  11. “Barbados or the Gallows”

    First of all, the red-legs were never slaves! They were convicts and ne’er-do-wells who were sent to the colonies in lieu of doing jail time or facing the gallows. They served for a definite time commensurate with their crimes, and their distaste for honest hard work led to the mass importation of African slaves.


  12. @The Scout: “Oh My God, I’m talking about an Utopian Barbados; is this possible? Maybe I should stop dreaming, shut off my comp and return to bed and wake up afresh.

    My friend, *NEVER* stop dreaming!

    And then, every day, take whatever actions *you* can to get us all a little bit closer.


  13. @degap: “First of all, the red-legs were never slaves!

    You are technically correct. They were, instead, “Indentured Servants”.

    They still, from what I understand, went through hell.

  14. INDENTURED SERVANTS AND SLAVES Avatar
    INDENTURED SERVANTS AND SLAVES

    To the learned Christ Halsall … not all ‘whites’ were ‘indentured servants.

    A short excerpt from http://www.anarchistblackcat.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2463

    “Although it was not a crime to kill any Irish, and soldiers were
    encouraged to do so, the slave trade proved too profitable to kill off
    the source of the product. Privateers and chartered shippers sent gangs
    out with quotas to fill, and in their zest as they scoured the
    countryside, they inadvertently kidnapped a number of English too. On
    March 25, 1659, a petition of 72 Englishmen was received in London,
    claiming they were illegally “now in slavery in the Barbados”’ . The
    petition also claimed that ‘7,000-8,000 Scots taken prisoner at the
    battle of Worcester in 1651 were sold to the British plantations in the
    New World,” and that “200 Frenchmen had been kidnapped, concealed and
    sold in Barbados for 900 pounds of cotton each.’

    Subsequently some 52,000 Irish, mostly women and sturdy boys and
    girls, were sold to Barbados and Virginia alone. Another 30,000 Irish
    men and women were taken prisoners and ordered transported and sold as
    slaves. In 1656, Cromwell’s Council of State ordered that 1000 Irish
    girls and 1000 Irish boys be rounded up and taken to Jamaica to be sold
    as slaves to English planters. As horrendous as these numbers sound, it
    only reflects a small part of the evil program, as most of the slaving
    activity was not recorded. There were no tears shed amongst the Irish
    when Cromwell died in 1660.”


  15. @INDENTURED SERVANTS AND SLAVES…

    I am *always* prepared (and, frankly, happy) to be proven wrong.

    I would be interested in debate on the formal, legal status of the “reds”.

    I would argue, however, that the “status” of *any* individual does not take away from the hardships experienced by *many* in *our* history.

    And, if I may, I continue to be intriqued by the constant presense of money / wealth / profit in all these stories of inhuman (but, empirically, very human) behaviour.

    Even (and especially) today.


  16. It has been recorded that in many of the West Indian islands the Irish slave population outnumbered that of the Africans. This too came about as , the slave traders had to pay a sum for ever African abducted and delivered to them for the onward journey to the West Indies. In Ireland the Irish were hunted down like rabbits and taken aboard, free of any purchase price. , a sort of FOB.


  17. @Galli Cantu: “It has been recorded that in many of the West Indian islands the Irish slave population outnumbered that of the Africans.

    Please present the evidence you claim you have of this.

    Not to say that I don’t believe you. But, not to say that I do, either.

    Please, kind sir. Present the *evidence* you might have.

    It might be worthy of consideration and discussion.


  18. Irish Eyes etc…

    There was never any such thing as an Irish slave in the WI. Irish catholic slave owners were the majority on Montserrat (St. Patty’s day is still a national holiday), prominent on St. Kitts, and Irish protestants on Antigua.


  19. Its well documented that there were.
    60,000 Irishmen and women were babadosed by Oliver Cromwell.


  20. @ru4real: “Its well documented that there were. 60,000 Irishmen and women were babadosed by Oliver Cromwell.

    What was their *status*? Were they Slaves? Were they Servants? If it was both, what were the numbers? Or at least the ratios?

    *WHERE* is it well documented? simple URLs are fine.

    An interesting (local) historical fact has been raised, and we can’t even come to convergence on the numbers and status….


  21. I think it’s a shame really that historical records are few and far between in Barbados. Those “red legs” of Irish and Scots decent seem not to have kept any written records of their lives over the past 400 years. Isn’t there a King family that lives in the back of beyond somewhere in Barbados?


  22. Repeat:our great sadness is that we have a proud university which has dropped the ball on the development of solar energy after the death of Professor Headley and now we learn that the documentation of a nugget of our history featuring the red legs may not yet have reach project outline within academic Barbados.

    It is ironic that Sir Hillary Beckles, a historian heads the UWI Cave Hill, we also have Dr. Karl Watson. Please tell us that we are being too harsh!


  23. Did not the brother of the Chief Justice present a documentary on the red legs of Barbados on CBC years ago?

  24. Micro Mock Engineer Avatar
    Micro Mock Engineer

    “A mere collector of supposed facts is as useful as a collector of matchboxes.” – Lucien Febvre.

    I think the answer to the ‘white slave question’ may be found in the origin of the word ‘kidnap’… which reminds me of yet another Febvre quote: “It is never a waste of time to study the history of a word”.


  25. We Irish were slaves to the English long before our countrymen were sent to Barbados so why the big surprise?? Up to the 1950’s the Irish were know as the “blacks” of Europe. Ireland was a colony just like any of the islands. Or is it just too difficult to accept that there was such a thing as a white slave??

  26. reluctant nonbeliever Avatar
    reluctant nonbeliever

    @David, Chris Halsall, MMMand others:

    The classic text on the subject is To Hell or Barbados: the Ethnic Cleansing of Ireland by Sean O’Callaghan (2001)

    See also an interesting recent (2007) paper by Nini Rodgers (‘Irish Slaves in the Caribbean: an Overview’) – available online:

    http://www.irlandeses.org/0711rodgers5.htm

    There’s also a very interesting Yale University research project (called Tangled Roots) about the shared slave histories of African-Americans/Irish-Americans

    http://www.yale.edu/glc/tangledroots/index.htm

    Finally, an Irish film company has made a documentary (still currently in post-production) about this very topic:

    http://www.moondance.tv/broadcast-barbados.htm

    So there is plenty of stuff available – though not necessarily at UWI (not familiar with how History is taught there).

    Worth pointing out however that current Cave Hill Principal Hilary Beckles published some 20 years ago a very interesting paper on Irish Indentured Servants in the Anglophone Caribbean.

    Hope this is useful.


  27. As far as my West Indian history goes, the Irish who came to Barbados were indentured servants. They didn’t work on the plantation like the blacks but in the “massa’s” house. They saw themselves as above the african slave in status and were treated that way. In the ’50’s and “60’s, this class of persons mainly from around New Castle and Martins Bay/Zoares area, were very racist. their children couldn’t be friendly with a black bajan. This has somewhat lessened as time go by, today i see a large amount of young people mixing and this is good for the country.There were a couple of the Irish decendence who did merge into and married blacks many years ago but that was a very small number. My grandfather was one of them.Yes, my grandfather was a “bajan white’ who married a black bajan. Funny they are some “bajan whites” still alive today who had a black grandmother but is too ashame to recognise it.


  28. Like you Scout, my grandmother was ‘bajan white’. Her mother-grandmother-father-sister-uncle-aunt had children with the ‘white supremacy’ on de plantation. So Bonny is a mix-up breed. Sorta fair complexion with ‘doogla’ hair. I could easily be mistaken for GTbanna too, not to mention my offspring. One of my cousins represented us at Ms.World a few moons ago. Bonny ain’t dat cute like she, but I sexyyyyyyyy. (tee-hee)


  29. ” The Scout // January 20, 2009 at 6:40 am

    As far as my West Indian history goes, the Irish who came to Barbados were indentured servants. They didn’t work on the plantation like the blacks but in the “massa’s” house.”

    Check your history Scout. Where do you think the name “redlegs” came from? from when the poor Irish and Scots indentured servants were forced to labour in the fields wearing the same kilts in which they arrived on Cromwell’s slave ships.

    No, you can’t revise history to your liking. Read “To Hell or Barbados,” or any of Prof. Hilary Beckles’ books or Prof. Karl Watson’s boks and articles.

    The Irish were field workers, not house servants. And Barbados was hell to them, just as it was for the African slaves.


  30. Red legs are truly lost. They ain’t nothing like the Irish or Scots.

    We used to get similar stories about Africans, living in mud huts.

    It was so funny how in my youth, I used to be attracted to Irish and Scottish accents. It was also a funny at-home feeling when I first visited Scotland. Did not feel that with England.

    Later, I found out that the story in my family is about an Irish lady who came to Barbados and had three daughters. The sisters all married black men.

    While not much could be ascertained about their husbands, there are many stories about these three sisters who interfaced with black for a moment in time. Some would say corrupting the African lineage.

    The only thing we can say about their husbands is that they were strong men who stood by their wives. I was fortunate enough to have met all of them. One was my grandmother but never knew her as she died before I knew myself. Her two sisters I knew. White women with blue eyes, speckled about the face and flowing silver-blue hair. One lived between T&T and Barbados.


  31. ROK,
    ‘white women with blue eyes’.
    You are describing my grand mother to a T. She was about 5′ tall or shorter but a real ‘devil’ when she ready.
    We like we related yah. Watch ya self.


  32. Some interesting comments/questions mixed with inaccuracies/mythology. But it’s good that the question of the Barbadian poor whites is in the public domain. Many years ago, in another island, I set a final exam question on poor whites and was made to take it out, on the grounds that West Indian poor whites were irrelevant. In the context of the eternal syndrome of rich white/poor black, there is/was no place for poor whites. That is why, from their perspective, upper class whites tended to privilege blacks over poor whites, no kith and kin scenario operated there as is often assumed.
    Now to hopefully clear up/answer some points raised in the many submissions. Red Legs is a pejorative term, albeit widely used in days gone by…less so today. The Irish contributed to the make up of the present poor white population of Barbados, but so did English and Scots. Large numbers of Irish prisioners came to Barbados in the seventeenth century. Their numbers were closer to 8,000, not the exaggerated numbers cited. Yet, there were more Irish here than in the archetypically “Irish” island, Monserrat. They were despised before they came here and the conditions under which they lived and worked led to excessive mortality. Were the Irish or any other West European ethnicity, enslaved people? The answer is NO, so long as we apply the definition of a chattel slave, especially continued slave status by descent. Yes, there are a few documented cases of whites being sold into chattel slavery, but these are few. Indentureship had a time limitation on it..if you could survive the horrendous treatment that these servants endured, then you had a chance through hard work to make it up the ladder. Now here is another mythological statement that has survived. Poor whites were either unwilling or unable to work hard. They were lazy and drunk and only black people could do sustained labour in a tropical environment. Medical research in the early twentieth century confirmed that chronic anemia caused by bad diet and massive hook worm infestation (poor whites walked bare foot) created the symptom which was erroneously diagnosed as laziness. An Irish soldier was given 500 lashes with a cat o’nine on the Garrison savannah for laziness. After hospitalization and recovery, he was again sentenced to another 500 lashes for laziness, this despite the protests of the doctors. He died before the 100th lash and an autopsy revealed that the man had a massive malignant tumor. Humans have always been and continue to be today, distinguished by their ability to inflict unspeakable torture and suffering on each other. We are a complex, sometimes irrational species, capable of great good and terrible evil.
    It is true that the written records leave much to be desired..most poor whites were semi or illiterate. But Jill Sheppard, Peter Simmonds, Hilary Beckles and myself among others, have attempted to tell their story. These works are available in libraries. For those interested, consult the Journal of Caribbean HistoryVol. 34 (2000) where I published an article “Walk and Nyam Buckra.” This tells the story of the approximately 2000 poor whites and their families who were thrown off the plantations at emancipation and left to fend for themselves. Alarmed at the numbers of elderly whites and children who had starved to death, the then governor sponsored an emigration scheme of whites to St Vincent, Bequia and Grenada. Their descendants still live on these islands today. Jamaica refused to accept Barbadian “walk and nyam buckra.”
    A few last comments. A majority of white Barbadians (some 65 to 75 per cent) were poor. It is only within the last sixty years that many families achieved middle clas status, but there are still several very poor white families on this island. Many whites owned no slaves and were treated like slaves by the slave owners and disdained/scorned by the slaves themselves.
    It would have been better to have put a picture of Rhianna Fenty as an example of a succesful poor white descendant as opposed to Sir Charles Williams, whose ancestry puts him higher up in the Barbadian social ladder.
    Finally, this issue is quite complex and I have just scratched the surface. Hopefully, a book I am now preparing, on the history of Barbadian whites will answer some of these questions. Here is the opening line. “This book is about white Barbadians whose story has never been adequately told. They deserve a work of this type. However, it is also the story of Barbadian blacks, who over the centuries and generations helped to shape and mould the lives, characters, world view and culture of their fellow islanders.”


  33. Dr.Watson

    Thanks for your contribution, the BU family welcomes it!

    A BU concern still remains and we are cognisant of your contribution.

    Why the lack of a solid body of works to represent the contribution of Poor Whites? We read your explanation about the lack of record keeping by Poor Whites and the other players but we are not convinced yet that our historians have done enough.


  34. Karl Watson: Thanks for the information contained in your post. I will be looking for The Journal of Caribbean History vol. 4 at my library. Hopefully I will have better luck with this book as they do not have O’Callaghan’s “Hell or Barbados”.


  35. er….volume 34


  36. I went to primary school with a white bajan name Terol Fenty. I always wondered what became of him.


  37. Having now studied the evidence and heard the arguments perhaps, David will now address the central question of whether to ban the use of the term, ‘red-legs’!! However, I’m not seriously, hopeful of an answer!!


  38. Hi from ireland . What amazes me is how it looks like nobody was immune from slaving ..the book The Stolen Village by Des Ekin relates the tale of a whole sea fishing villages population from Cork Ireland (village is baltimore)being captured by Barbary slavers and brought to Algiers & sold as slaves in the 1600s. It gets better though..those captured were not irish but were recent english protestant settlers in ireland , and a theory has it that a local catholic irishman engineered the thing to get clear legal possession of the town.


  39. Ian, I’ve heard of this episode before. However, my people were taken-in i.e. duped, by your (white) people, far more than anybody else!!

    What cretins!!


  40. I am all for looking at this question of poor whites, but surely the question should be dealt with by David Thompson, in whose seat most of them reside. If the PM can’t do something about it, what hope is there other than for Cow and Bizzy to do something. The two of them got enough money to do the right thing.


  41. Hi also from Ireland,

    Very interesting information. I have read O’Callaghan “To Hell or Barbados” and it’s a great read.
    No question some English from back then considered the Irish as sub-human and treated them accordingly. But don’t forget that St Patrick – the most revered Irishman of them all – was himself probably British and originally captured as a slave by the Irish. It’s a tangled web of DNA all over the world. Hopefully we are moving on to new horizans with Obama.


  42. David, I think that most accepted historical narratives have St. Patrick as an Irishman, who was taken captive to France, and then returned to Ireland and evangelized the Irish with his distinctive Celtic form of Catholicism, which is far different from Roman Catholicism.

    As for Obama – or is that O’Bama, the Irishman? – God Bless him, but he’s already been laden with unrealistic, messianic expectations, like all incoming American presidents. Hopefully he’ll be different…


  43. 199 // January 20, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    Having now studied the evidence and heard the arguments perhaps, David will now address the central question of whether to ban the use of the term, ‘red-legs’!! However, I’m not seriously, hopeful of an answer!!

    ****************

    Obviously, David, already has and doubtless, BFP also, will pretend not to have seen the above request, or it they have, will be incapable of taking a decision about it and making that decision known to all of us and then they criticise others for indeciseveness and slowness of action!! As usual with Bajans, let’s just pretend we did n’t see it, but then, please don’t criticise the DLP, BLP or anybody else for their own comotose-reactions!!


  44. 199

    Even if you are not a red leg, people must be calling you that by your appearance. Maybe you should put up an argument for banning the term?


  45. Deaspora-ite
    Historians differ on their writings. I’m telling you what I was taught in West Indian history back in the ’60’s when I was at secondary school.I don’t know about Karl Watson but Prof Hilary Beckles would have been in junior school then. As read then, the only “red legs” that were in the fields are the ones sent there for punishment by the “massa.”


  46. ROK, see my and other posts at the top! Case already made but it’s easier to pretend not to see!!


  47. All I can say wrote

    “All I can say is, BU upsetting de apple cart. Though all my days we were led to believe that only us blacks were brought here as slaves…The buffoons at Cave Hill ain’t gonna be pleased”

    The history teachers at cave Hill are not buffoons. I don’t know where you went to school, but in my history classes way back int he 1960’s I certainly learned about the “poor whites” and how they came to be in Barbados.

    But maybe all you can say did not think history was important and skipped history classes.

    The term red legs has always been impolite. The tern poor white is more of a neutral descriptor


  48. Even today the poor whites in Bequai are know as Bajans even tough they have been living in St. Vincent since the 1840’s

    I agree with Karl Watson that the poor whites are not lazy. I knew (know) Rihanna’s great aunt, a poor white Bajan from St. John. She is a decent hard working, working class Bajan woman. If Rihanna is reaping success because of her talent and hard work it may be partly because she came from a family which valued and practised hard work.


  49. @Bimbro

    We have heard the several positions that redlegs is a pejorative term, so far we have not seen the evidence to be fully convinced.


  50. @David

    Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines pejorative as “to make or become worse….having negative connotations; tending to disparage or belittle”.

    When I was growing up both the labels “redlegs” and “ecky becky” were interchangeable to disparage or belittle poor whites – I agree with Bimbro aka 199.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading