← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

image After reading many of the comments posted to the blog Public Faces, Private Lives: Homosexuality in Barbados the BU household was left to wonder: how can Barbadians change entrenched and irrelevant attitudes to survive in a changing world, and at the same time protect the core values which have led to the successful Barbados brand. Our small size makes us insignificant as policy shapers in a global context. Our high level of education gives our people an advantage to think for ourselves. The two positions are contentious, so how do we deal with it? What do we really want as a people?

Increasingly in recent years we have a sense that Barbados has been allowing its space to be polluted by the fumes from ‘up-north’. Our people appear to be willing to inhale the fumes but what about the good stuff?

The recent energy crisis triggered by the volatility in oil price on the world market has caused many Americans to dump their gas guzzling SUV’s for more fuel efficient vehicles. In Barbados by observation SUV’s continue to be sold at relatively high level. Americans have assessed the situation and reacted to to protect the financial security of the family. Many Barbadians on the other hand see the ownership of an SUV has a status symbol and appear unwilling to adjust behaviour. In recent weeks with the decline in the cost of a barrel of oil their has been a clamour on talk radio and other media for the perceived reduction to be passed on to consumers. People have already forgotten that there is a need to change behaviours to be energy conscious and look for alternatives energy sources. Barbadians can learn from the energy debate ongoing in the USA presidential elections.

There was a report highlighted in the USA last week that many middleclass families in the USA have decided to switch enrolment of their children to public schools. The report further suggested that studies show that when middleclass children interact in a school environment with children from lower socio-economic backgrounds, it helps the less privileged children. It Barbados if you are from the middleclass it is axiomatic that their children will attend private schools: private schools in Barbados are not cheap. Alarmingly there is a cadre of working class who have decided that they lack the confidence in the public school system, and they have been making the sacrifice to send their children to private schools. Maybe their behaviour is a little aspiration as well!

A new government has entered office at a time when there is a new order of how things will have to be done. Globalization, renewable technology, corruption, emerging world economic powers couple with heightened geo-political strategies and on and on it goes. Barbadians will have to decide what is the road map which we need to draw to chart our path into the 22nd Century.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

38 responses to “Changing Attitudes”


  1. Dear BU

    Good morning. Respect to one and all.

    Has anyone reading thought about the actual cost to the environment of changing to a new vehicle? Peole do this too often.

    There is no reason why a car should not be driven for 10-15 years and kept well. It is environmentally beneficial because it does not deplete resources.

    Do not drive quickly.
    Do not pollute your environment with noisy sport muffler systems that howl across the night through our windows.
    Do choose a gas- or diesel-efficient vehicle.. and then drive it for as many years as possible.
    Do exercise a personnal opinion on how we may help our local environment and economy.

    That is an environmentally and economic beneficial attitude IMHO.

  2. Snake-in-the-grass Avatar
    Snake-in-the-grass

    @ Changing Attitudes “Our high level of education gives our people an advantage to think for ourselves. ” HELLO? You had better get out there ‘among the people’ and find the truth before making such a glib statement.


  3. I’m glad someone commented on this so-called high level of education before I did.

    What is this high level of education that we continue to fool ourselves about?

    If we’re talking about the ability to read and write one’s name, then yes.

    After that, only 40% of secondary school children are leaving school with the basic requirements of five or more CXCs.

    We are performing terribly in the sciences. Very few people are capable of speaking a foreign language; we’re putting out university graduates with poor writing skills and the list goes on and on.

    Our postgraduate levels are terribly low. So what is this high level of education that we continue to talk about?


  4. Appreciate the feedback but it all relative isn’t it?


  5. Well if you are comparing us to Haiti or any of those backward banana republics like St. Lucia, St. Vincent or St. St. Kitts, then yea – our level of education is very high.
    However why should we constantly compare ourselves to the lowest common denominator?
    The picture is very different if you look at Switzerland or Singapore. Isnt it?
    Everything is surely relative.


  6. John Doe we concede the point.


  7. John Doe

    In case you did not realise it, the lowest common denominator will give you the largest answer.

    I think that leadership greatly influences attitudes. For example, most students come away with their teachers ideals, especially when that teacher demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject matter and an ability to articulate it.

    In society, there are people who lead the way to success that are admired, even if for a principled stand. You also have the relationships between parents and children where informed parents could help make the change.

    The point here is that leadership usually has an aim and a focus. For example, let us look at the Civil Service which delivers services to the public.

    In the Civil Service, I worked in an office that used to produce. Let us say that it had to produce. Why?
    1. we had the lives of hundreds of thousands of people per year in our hands;
    2. we were governed by the rules of an international covenant of which Barbados was a signatory;
    3. by maintaining the standards under the covenant, our airport was able to maintain its status as an international airport.

    Without going any further, we see that these were goals and focus necessary to maintain a standard and as workers, we were committed to the work by our very contract of employment, which did not allow us to breach any of the standards, even once; unless there was some technical problem beyond our control. Even then, there were back-ups and contingency codes.

    Take another department such as the welfare where there are no standards for efficient and effective production. there is no customer service. There are no rules which state that two or three clients should not wait for five hours on the benches of the welfare department because the intake officer is not coming in until afternoon, as this officer has a workload on the road.

    In recent times, I have seen the Child care Board assign a dedicated intake officer and clients are quickly dispatched. Not sure what is happening at the Welfare now.

    The workplace seems to be a good place to start trying to change attitudes. This is one way to reach a large mass of people. Take the work done on HIV/AIDS in the workplace. Indeed this highlights the importance of unions to social development; not only economic development. For years the NHAC hammered the population with information in all sorts of media, but real progress started only when the workplace was targeted; both public and private sectors.

    We must therefore seek better ways to deliver services, which is what NISE is about. I have to say that I have no problem at all with NISE, just that it did not include all the stakeholders, that could have made a greater difference in a short space of time.

    Quite frankly, nothing in place now is really addressing the problem as it should. The bits and pieces here and there is just not robust enough to prevent backsliding. So we take two steps forward and sometimes three steps back.


  8. BU household, and all others, again I welcome your deep concern for our dear land in this rapidly changing ‘global’ enviornment, and the impact it will, or can have on us.

    As you all are well aware by now, my World View is predicated on the historic Judeo/Christian perspective, and therefore, I cannot seek to view the World stage other than through the ‘eyes’ of God’s Word, no matter how much some might find this to be irrelevant.

    However, before submitting part 1 of a three part series I did a few years ago for a news paper, for your consideration, I’d like to just make reference to a few of your opening remarks, as they go the heart of what I have to submit.

    “…the BU household was left to wonder: how can Barbadians change ‘entrenched’ and ‘irrelevent’ attitudes to survive a changing world, and at the same time protect the ‘Core’ values which have led us to the successful Barbados brand.”

    “Our small size makes us insignificant as policy shapers in a ‘global’ context, Globalization, corruption, emerging world economic powers couple with heightened geo-political strategies and on and on it goes.” emphasis added.

    Here is my part 1 in that 3 part series, I’m sure you’ll be able to see where ‘Globalization’ is taking us.

    “Globalization, North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT), World Trade Organization (WTO), European Union (EU), Caribbean Single Market and Economy (CSME); what do all of the catch-phrases really mean? Does it have any bearing on what Rev, Lucille Baird in her column, The Barbados Advocate, Sunday December 19, mentioned in response to a statement made by Mr. Carl Ince in his column of Monday December 13, where he said: ‘Objective analysis of the current situation…suggest that change will come sooner or later, not directly from our Parliment but through the courts national or international.”

    Yes, the immediate context of the remark is regarding the legislation of homosexuality and/or both prostitution in this country. However, does this have a much wider implication for the ‘sovereingty’ of nation/states as posited in Reverend Baird’s remark that says; ‘But what I am most curious about, is whether Mr. Ince is suggesting that this nation’s sovereignty and its right to determine its own political, social and cultural direction is now to be guided by governments and other “powers” outside our national context.”

    The answer Reverend Baird is YES, and sadly so, but clearly prophesied and foretold in God’s Word, the Scriptures, it all has to happen and is literally unfolding before our eyes and lives.

    I will cite a few references from Dr. Grant Jeffrey’s book, “Surveillance Society, THE RISE OF ANTICHRIST.” This book is the result of over thirty five years of research involving thousands of books, articles, interviews with experts in intelligence, military surveillance, and study of the Scriptures. (Acknowledgements, p.7).

    Jeffrey states: “This book will examine the rapid development of a powerful world government that is eroding our national sovereignty and our cherished democratic values. We will investigate the development of a web of international treaties that is preparing the way for the virtual surrender of our national control over our environment, our economy, our currency, our education, our immigration. Step by step, in the name of ‘Globalization’ and the demand of various United Nations agencies to harmonise our laws with other nations, our national sovereignty is being eroded…’

    Jeffrey goen on to correctly state: “The proud national sovereignty of western nations that allowed us to create a free interprise economy with political and religious freedom is being surrendered by our modern political leaders. These new leaders no longer believe in the patriotic love of their sovereign nations; they have adopted a philosophy of ‘Globalism’ and share the desire to become citizens of the world.”

    Setting the Stage for World Government.

    Thousands of years ago the divinely inspired prophets Daniel and John foretold that a ‘World Government’ led by the Antichrist, would seize global power in the last days (Dan. 7:14) “And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And all that dwell upon the eartg shall worship him.” (Rev. 13:7-8).

    Wheth you believe this or not, does not alter on bit the historic reality (present era) of the literal manifestation of what God’s prophets foretold would happen.

    Let us hear Dr. Jeffrey as he unfolds some of the facts:

    “The Report of the Commission on Global Governance.” In 1991, a meeting in Stockholm, Sweden produced a manifesto entitled Common Responsibility in the 1990s: The Stockholm Initiative on Global Security and Governance. Many world leaders, including Dr. Boutros-Boutros Ghali (appointed as the Secretary General of the United Nations in 1992), endorsed this key planning document for the coming world government. Another report entitled, “Our Global Neighbourhood, The Report of the Commission on Global Governance” by an independent group of 28 global leaders, describes both the philosophy and the strategy to replace the present situation of fragmented and uncordinated national governments, with a true world government…this document illustrates the plans of those who wish to replace our present system of national sovereignty with a ‘new world order’ under the popular catch phrase of ‘ Global Governance.’

    This is no joking matter, I’ll like to share with you, more of Jeffrey’s intense research on this ‘New’ world order, as he unfolds many other international treaties, all carefully planned after the end of the Second World War, and is unfolding rapidly to erode our cherished national, sovereign independence, in stealth, as Globalization.


  9. Do the Buddhists or Muslims have a similar prophecy?
    What about the Amerindians in the Amazon? Do they have a similar prophecy?

    What about the the Sikhs and the Hindus? Or those who never heard the word as you know it Carlos?


  10. On September 29th at 2:05 p.m. John Doe said “those backward banana republics like St. Lucia”

    May I remind John that the backward banana republic, St. Lucia has procuced 2 Nobel prize winners. The late economist Arthur Lewis and the very much alive poet and university teacher Deryk Walcott, and of course St. Lucia also produced Walcott and Lewis’ teachers and continues to produce it fair share of the world’s bright, well educated young people.

    St. Lucia is neither backward, nor a banana republic.

    And no, I am not St. Lucian, just a Bajan who likes the truth.


  11. So because they produced Walcott and Lewis they’re not a backward banana republic?

    Ok.

    That if that seems logical to you.

    Since when does the Nobel Prize legitimize development?

    Shupes!

    Um is a backward banana republic. Dat’s my opinion. You are free to differ.

    You ever tried doing business over there?
    They’re 20 year behind de sugar plantation called Barbados. One is a banana republic and the other one is a big sugar plantation.


  12. Dear John Doe:

    How many Nobel prizes do Switzerland and Singapore have to their credit and what is their population relative to St. Lucia’s?

    The picture is very different if you look at Switzerland or Singapore. Isnt it?


  13. Actually I do business there quite frequently for more than 20 years. Going there Friday.

    Maybe you encounter difficulties becasue the people know that you hold them in contempt and they treat you with the contempt that you deserve.


  14. I think Derek would agree with me that his native St. Lucia is quite backward.

    Would you like me to confirm this?


  15. Like I said, if the Nobel Prize is your litmus test for development, then good for you.

    I’d rather be a Switzerland or Singapore than a backward St. Lucia with its two Nobel laureates anyday.

    It’s not contempt that I have for St. Lucia, it’s calling a spade a spade.
    I actually love the little backward place.
    That doesnt take away from its backwardness.
    Look at how filthy Castries is for start.
    Shupes.
    Um backward.


  16. Oh Miss J, please go and read up on Lewis’ Theory of Dependency and you will see that it was very much informed by his observation of the backwardness of whence he came.

    And while you at it, offer Derek some rum and see how much contempt he has for the whole Caribbean including St. Lucia.
    Shupes!


  17. Ahh John Doe. But would Switzerland or Singapore let YOU in to stay? Do you have something to offer? Are you clean and tidy? You don’t throw things out of your car window into other people’s yards do you? You put out your garbage neatly and on the right day do you? You recycle your plastics, glass and metals do you? You sweep the street in front of your house every Saturday do you? You are well educated and your children, if you have some are even better educated than you are, right? You walk, ride a bike or use public transit in order to preserve a good clean environment do you?


  18. I don’t drink alcohol. So Deryk will have to drink with you, not with me.


  19. I am quite capable of finding works by and about Walcott without your help, so no thanks.

    Can call my girlfriend and get Walcott’s number right now. But I have no wish to speak with him.

    Thanks, but no thanks.


  20. Oh Miss J, you jabbing tonight. But for your information, I dont litter. I’ve been separating my garbage for the last 14 years.
    I have reduced the paper in my office significantly. I walk to work and back.

    What else you wanna know bout me?

    Are we discussing an issue here or are you getting into my business.

    Have you ever met Walcott or Naipaul for that matter?

    Naipaul holds the Caribbean in even more contempt than Walcott.

    Or the Nobel laureate from Mexico, Octavio Paz? Do you have any idea the contempt he had for Mexico?

    So what’s your point? Show the the positive correlation between St. Lucia two Nobel awards and their level of development, then juxtapose that to Switzerland (which has Nobel prizes too by the way) and Singapore.

    Shupes.

    Miss J, ah love ya, but ya lil off tonite.


  21. John Doe…..
    “Haiti and all……backward banana republics ………” Spoken like a true arrogant, know-it, holier-than-thou ignoramus. All you need now is your “toe tag.”

    Carlos……
    This globalization, one world, new world order government is as real as the air you breathe. It is inscribed is the US dollar bill “NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM” The turmoil that’s going on in the US money apparatus right now is all a part of their scheme to institute this one world government. Gordon Brown has already put that call out there as far as the money system is concerned. That’s why the UN was institutued in the first place contrary to popular beliefs. The UN, EU,NATO, CSME et all are set up to bring in this NWO. HOWEVER, this same Judeo/Christian view that you espouse is the source of our enslavement to their system. The money-changers – judeo and the armageddonists – christian are leading the sheeple at breakneck speed toward human extinction. On the one hand you have the “jews” spewing forth this crap that they are god’s chosen and on the other hand you have the christians on their knees worshipping the jews, telling everyone else to fall in line. Today you see there is whole-scale slaughtering of muslims, simply because they do not buy this crap, hence they are called terrorist and the whole world should hate them. This is all part of the plan. Today humans are being micro-chipped and very soon everyone will have to be chipped it in order to survive in their fake world. However, there will be no end of the world, there will only be an end to this evil system as we know it and millions of lives will be sacrificed along the way. This is the fight between good and evil. Don’t mind your PM signing away your rights via the EPA, he’s a mere tool, willingly or unknowingly. That’s why they give us religion, entertainment and (mis)education to keep us distracted. The more educated you think you’ve become, the better off you think you are but this only to your demise. Once you’ve accepted their standard of education that’s when the wool has been pulled over your eyes and you are forced to see yourself through their lenses. Right now big brother is on full throttle in the UK and US. Hold your arses because humanity is in for a hell of a ride……


  22. @ Hopi

    Ok, you and Miss J win.

    Let me rephrase it.

    Haiti, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, St. Kitts are all developed nations that we should truly emulate.
    Who wouldnt want to be like Haiti.
    Haiti is so developed that even the Haitians dont want to leave.

    Shupes.

    What’s arrogant about facts?

    Is Guinea Bissau backward or not?
    Are there any backward nations on planet earth? Or do we all have the same level of development?

    Shupes!


  23. What else you wanna know bout me?

    Are you young, good looking, single and rich?

    Or old, ugly, rich and almost dead? 🙂

    If either of the above please send a letter to: J at P.O. Box


  24. I beg ya please John Doe don’t put me in the same class as Hopi.


  25. Ok. Maybe I should play fair.

    Pretty good article BU.

    A lot of people are very insecure and the SUV/private school/pretty rent house makes them feel better about themselves.

    This Bajan long ago gave up any vehicle paid down the mortgage, and made sure that St. X primary/Harrison College/UWI/private university over in away wu’k fine for the picknies.

    But I have always been a divergent thinker. The dearly beloved with good reason calls me SD.


  26. John Doe

    Many returning nationals will tell you how backward Barbados is, even if we are a notch beyond St. Lucia. I visited St. Lucia not long ago and realised that Barbados was like that once; less concrete and more friendly people.


  27. I see that Carlos brought his Bible here with him but i would dearly like to hear his views on Barbadian society. We have to start at home first.

    We already know that the white man plans to rule this earth and bring about a world order. We about to sign it over in the EPA. If one of us from down here went to another planet where people were still living in the forest, we could do some really accurate predictions.

    Based on our knowledge of human behaviour, we could tell the people running about in the jungle that soon each area will have a government. We could tell them that earthquakes will come and that the ground will open up and spew out itself; that the day will come when their descendants will become selfish and that everyman will want his house and land protected.

    We could also tell them about the greed and to avoid it. Simply put, because of our experience here on earth we would be able to forewarn them of the pitfalls. We may not be able to tell them the exact time it will happen but we can give them signs.

    For example, we could tell them that one day strange men will come and that they should put them out, otherwise they will take your land and claim it as theirs.

    We can tell them beware of blue-eyed pale skin men and that when they come they should kill them or lose their land and their lives.

    Wow! the things we could tell them and the prophecies we could give them could last more than 2000 years.


  28. You got me here laughing ROK. True dat!
    We could tell them about the plagues of locusts and african snails.

    It’s just human behavior.

    Wasnt Hitler supposed to be the Antichrist? Or before him wasnt it Napoleon? Or Charlemagne?

    Maybe Nero came too soon after Christ.


  29. John Doe

    Some thought is was Saddam Hussein who used to wear the long flowing blue as the prophecy declares, but the long flowing blue may be the US flag and the white horse may be the fighter planes.

    The thing about these things is that you can only recognise them on hindsight.


  30. “Our high level of education gives our people an advantage to think for ourselves.”

    I am sorry I must blatantly disagree, I find that Barbadians are educated in terms of being able to read and write (even though that ability is diminishing daily….just look at the results of recent 11-plus exams), but I find the ability to reason and think for oneself is clearly lacking. The idea bandwagon is quite noticeable, it was so clear in the last election. Ideas, beliefs and perceptions are quite interestingly spread like fashion sense. If someone else says it and it sounds semi-plausible then it must be correct and it becomes my belief that is generally how it goes.

    I would not say that we are on the bottom of the slope either but the ability to reason still is yet to be fully developed even in the most developed countries. We still have to address this and cannot become complacent.


  31. although he said it in an arrogant way I am in agreement with John Doe re Haiti, ST lucia etc…

    Barbados is alos relatively backward compared to Switzerland etc

    Nobel prizes and other scholarly awrads have little or nothing to do with the country unless you consider that most of the time these award is given to someone who writes negatively about their homeland. And usually live eslewhere.

    Anyway Barbados does hvae a relatively high level of education but we have taken that for granted and hav lowered our xepectations and standards. We hav become very willing to excuse people. o a recent trip to London qnd France I was amazed at how despit all the diversity and inclusion these societies have been able to maintain a definite sens of order and culture which although changing appears to b e at a pac that is acceptable…

    Perhaps it is because they have such a strong cultural history.

    I do think that we can manage chnage alot better however


  32. ME…..
    Don’t you realise that managing change a lot better is simply because of the pliabilty of the society which renders it as a very weak one. Always willing, ready and able to adapt to others simply because there are no strong defining characteristics of Bajan society. The only traits that I see Bajans hold fast to are ignorance and arrogance.


  33. “Don’t you realise that managing change a lot better is simply because of the pliabilty of the society which renders it as a very weak one. Always willing, ready and able to adapt to others simply because there are no strong defining characteristics of Bajan society. The only traits that I see Bajans hold fast to are ignorance and arrogance.”

    *************************************
    Is that English?

    Is there someone out there who is willing to translate this into something intelligible?

    My gosh!


  34. Anon…….
    Its 2230 hrs, do you know where your children are?


  35. @ Hopi

    I know exactly where my children are and I also know that what you put up there make absolutely no sense.


  36. Anon…..
    You must have found sense in there somewhere to know that it “make absolutely no sense.” Maybe you can become pliable in this instance and try using the right side of your brain.


  37. The Nobel Prize in literature of recent years has become a Swedish “be-kind-to-the-native” sort of thing .


  38. Picking up from where I left off, a few days ago on ‘Setting the Stage for World Government’ citing from Dr. Grant Jeffrey’s extensive research, and well documented book, “Surveillance Society, The Rise of Antichrist”

    “The Report of the Commission on Global Goverance” Stockholm, Sweden, (1991), and a manifesto entitled, “Commmon Responsibility in the 1990’s: The Stockholm Initiative of Global Security and Governance,” All of this is just another microcosm of and precursory to the ultimate World AntiChrist Government. As Jeffrey states:

    “Despite the rise and fall of countless empires throughout history, there has never been a true world government. However, as we begin the new millennium, the elite (globalists) are moving behind the scenes to create one. The rising power of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, the World Trade Organization, and the World Court, are moving quickly beyond the days of national sovereignty and politically independent nations.”

    Most citizens of the western democratic world treasure and appreciate the free enterprise system, notwithstanding its inherent failures and shortcomings. Therefore, the globalists must of necessity, have and promote some covert rational in answer to the many, who see through and oppose this concept. Or as Jeffrey says:

    “One of the most effective arguments of globalists in favor of world government, is their claim that hundreds of millions of deaths, due to the horrific conflicts of two world wars, and the history of international warfare over the last several centuries, shows the absolute necessity of eliminating the nation states that have fought these wars. They argue that if there were ‘no nations’ then war will become almost impossible.” Jeffrey then goes on to correctly point out, that “While this sounds reasonable, a closer examination reveals the flaw in such thinking. There are at present far more violent and deadly ‘civil wars’ that are being fought today within the borders of nations than international wars.”

    The man who in most recent times pushed and promoted the concept of a ‘New World Order’ was none other than former President George Bush. On this Jerrrey writes:

    “On september 11, 1991, former President George Buch announced to Congress that he was working to create a ‘New World Order’ Bush subsequently used the term ‘New World Order’ more than 200 hundred times in his speeches. However, noting the growing opposition to ‘world government’ from patriotic citizens, who began to realize the true implications for American democracy, Bush’s National Security Advisor, Brent Scowcroft, persuaded Bush to refrain from alerting the public about what the New World Order really meant.”

    That this ‘New World Order’ must be brought about clandestinely, is again demonstrated by what powerful Democratic Senator, Alan Cranston, from California, who was at one time the President of United World Federalists, said. Jeffrey quotes: ‘Cranston declared, “I believe deeply in the need for world law…I believe in the concept of federalism on a world scale.” Jeffrey then states: “However, senator Cranston also realized they could only achieve their goals of world government by stealth, rather than through open debate and democracy. In an interview to Transition magazine, published by the Institute for World Order, Senator Cranston admitted, ” The more talk about world government, the less chance of achieving it, because it frightens people who would accept the concept of world laws.”

    Jeffrey then goes on to stress poignantly, that; “The truth is that ‘the new world order’ encompasses the creation of a global government under the United Nations, with a joint American and Russian superpower partship. Tragically, a New World Order, will ultimately and inexorably lead to political, economic, and religious slavery for all of us.”

    Former British Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, expressed her deep concern and clear perception on this sinister ‘New World Order’ in the context of the European Union (EU) in these words:

    “It would be the greatest abdication of national and political soverignty in history.”

    Because of her stance and outspokenness, she was overthrown by Sir Geoffrey Howe, the Deputy Prime Minister, as Jeffrey asserts: ‘…because her pro-British stance stood in the way of the UK’s enthusiastic entry into the European super state. Howe admitted that plans for the formation of the European super state were originally created following the end of World War II.”

    This is just a brief look at the sinister plot and plans of these elite ‘globalists’ that goes way back in their plannings, from the end of World War II.

    All of this has serious and devastating consequences for all nation states, and we in the Caribbean (CSME) are in no was exempt from its implications, as we have already become a signatory to some of these international treaties, all part and plan of the ‘New World Order’ to erode our national, sovereign, independent democracy, under the guise of ‘globalism’ and the so-call need for everyone’s benefit. A lie from the ‘pit’ of Hell!!

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading