← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Sir Roy TrotmanIn anticipation of the rising cost of living, Sir Roy Trotman the venerable head of the Barbados Workers Union (BWU) has signaled that he will be expecting double digit wage settlements on behalf of his workers. He made his expectation known at the recent May Day celebration held at Browne’s beach in St. Michael. Prime Minister David Thompson who was invited to speak at the same function, used the occasion to deliver a strong response to the union boss, i.e. his government does not subscribe to using high wage settlements as a counter to rising cost of living.

The publicly stated position of Prime Minister Thompson and that of Sir Roy seems to be building to a certain collision. There is the widely held view by the economists that that there is a delicate relationship between wage and price which MUST be managed with care. Sir Roy has also been quick to remind Barbadians that ‘voluntarism and conciliation” has worked very well for Barbados over the years. He also felt the need to deride the move by government to introduce ‘arbitration’ which is a proposal to revise the labour laws.

A recent communication from BU family Linchh reminded us that we live in a dynamic time. The current environment demands that as people and organizations we must be receptive to using any technique which is known to resolve problems.

Here is a snippet of what Linchh, BU family member wrote:

The point I want to make is that despite the vaunted success of Barbadian “volunteerism” in labour relations (which only means that Bajans resort to common sense when everything else fails) we must be open to ALL appropriate methods of settling disputes. Isn’t there anthing to be learnt from the recent Sandy Lane Hotel, and Royal Shop labour disputes?

The DLP Manifesto for the 2008 General Election contains the following proposals regarding labour and the labour movement: Conversely, a new DLP government will move to immediately enact a comprehensive national Labour Rights legislative compendium which will include the following:

  • A Full Employment Rights Act
  • An Alternative Disputes Settlement and Arbitration Committee
  • A Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Act
  • National minimum wages legislation
  • Legislation fully recognizing Trade Unions.

Obviously, the pace and content of this programme will need to be discussed, not only with the labour movement, but with other stakeholders, as well, in view of their critical role in the future social and economic development of Barbados. Sir Roy cannot be permitted to mount his high horse and act as if he believes that the new DLP government is a “one trick pony”!

We find the message from the BU family member insightful because it exposes the failure of the tried and trusted dispute method using voluntarism in the Sandy Lane and the Royal Shop saga. Discussions are said to be ongoing, but it is clear that the BWU now finds itself in a defensive position. It should be apparent to Sir Roy and his lieutenants that past models used for making decisions, if taken in the current climate can have a deleterious impact on our economy. Is it unreasonable to expect that going forward industrial relations matters will be viewed more in in the context of their national import – rather than the immediate rights violation of the employee?

Who said that it is a perfect world!

Sir Roy should be concerned that the changing state of the world where mergers and acquisitions and other corporate alliances is progressing at a dizzying pace. This trend is having and will continue to have a destabilizing effect on the global industrial relations climate. How unions attempt to manage this changing landscape will require a flexibility by industrial relation practitioners. The fear of the BU household is Sir Roy and his cohorts resorting to intractable positions based on a traditional dispute resolution approach. An example of the irrelevance of Sir Roy’s out-dates approach is evident in the current Sandy Lane/Royal Shop stand-off.

By the way Sir Roy, we heard your plea directed at the growing Guyanese contingent currently working in Barbados. We appreciate that this is a vulnerable group which some Barbadians have been reported to be exploiting. We also appreciate that the BWU membership maybe dwindling and the Guyanese working population represent an excellent opportunity to swell membership. It should be interesting to see the path the labour movement in Barbados resigns itself to travelling.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

17 responses to “The Hour Of Decision For The Labour Rights Movement In Barbados”


  1. […] lauianny wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptIn anticipation of the rising cost of living, Sir Roy Trotman the venerable head of the Barbados Workers Union (BWU) has signaled that he will be expecting double digit wage settlements on behalf of his workers. He made his expectation known at the recent May Day celebration held at Browne’s beach in St. Michael. Prime Minister David Thompson who was invited to speak at the same function, used the occasion to deliver a strong response to the union boss, i.e. his government does not subscribe to using high wage settlements as a counter to rising cost of living. The publicly stated position of Prime Minister Thompson and that of Sir Roy seems to be building to a certain collision. There is the widely held view by the economists that that there is a delicate relationship between wage and price which MUST be managed with care. Sir Roy has also […] […]


  2. Has the BWU been practicing succession planning? When Morris and Trotman retires soon who is there?

  3. reality check Avatar

    one can’t demand higher wages if the pie is shrinking.

    The DLP needs to urgently focus on creating long term sustainable jobs not by merely constructing bulidings or increasing debt on huge boondoggles like Kengsington Oval, Gems, Dodds and our flyovers but rather by encouraging new businesses to come to Barbados with every possible reasonable incentive.

    At the moment people are losing their jobs and asking for more without corresponding productivity.This just can’t and won’t work.

  4. Knight of the Long Knives Avatar
    Knight of the Long Knives

    The unions definitely need to be held in check. Does of us in management positions in unionised companies know well how high handed unions are especially defending the vast quantity (not all) of lazy, dishonest union delegates and their cohorts, who are defended steadfastly by the union for no other reason than that they are delegates. In the company I work with and in most hotels (I know because I speak to other management people in other companies) 75-90% of delegates are the worst employees. I recognise the need for unions but they really need to hold their member especially delegates to higher standards and not lower as it usually seems.


  5. I appreciate all that the BWU has done over the years in defending the ‘working’ class people of B’dos; where the workers rights have been violated, the BWU has been there to represent them, and this is just and right.

    However, the last recent dispute between the Royal Shop/Sandy Lane and the BWU fiasco, manifested an attitude by Sir Roy, and ‘Bobby’ that left a lot to be desired, and most certainly did nothing to endare respect for this stance taken by these distinguised trade unionist.

    I would like to ask Sir Roy; (1) Are the employees always right, upright, correct, just, undistorted, appropriate and befitting, in walking off the job, regardless of what justifiable right their employers also have in relation to the terms and conditions that obtained in the first instance, while accepting employment?

    (2) Are the employers, always specious, unsound, misguided, wrong, and totally mistaken, in their claim to just rights as well?

    Sir Roy, with all due respect to you and Bobby, your stance and position, is one that comes over as being not only militant, belligerent, but down right dictatorial, where the employers have absolutely NO rights at all!

    Thank God, most right thinking Bajans from a cross section of our working population, felt that the BWU position was blatantly wrong!


  6. The union is obviously trying to protect its diminishing base. Like other groups in our society they are willing to prostitute themselves in the process.


  7. It is patently clear to many people in Barbados that the trade union movement and trade unionism have significantly contributed to the national development of the country. And, this involves from the earliest days of organized labour in Barbados to quite recently (90s). Hence, from Charles Duncan Oneal’s Working Men’s Association, founded in the 192os, to the still existing Barbados Workers Union (BWU) and the National Union of Public Workers (NUPW), founded in 1941 and 1944 respectively, from the various regional and international trade union umbrella organizations, like the Caribbean Congress of Labour, that have a presence in Barbados, to the Congress of Trade Unions and Staff Associations of Barbados (CTUSAB), the labour movement and trade unionism in Barbados have historically played a fair role in the gradual improvement of the social and working conditions of the masses and middle classes of people of the country; in agitating for and heping secure the enactment of important pieces of industrial/labour and trade-union related legislation (the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the Holidays With Pay Act, etc.), in order to give meaningful political legal support to the further development of the affairs of marginalized and the vulnerable in the Barbadian society; and in making sure that the industrial relations climate in the country, and the relations between labour, private sector and government remain as stable and harmonious as possible.

    However, there is no doubt that within recent times, in Barbados, the trade union movement and trade unionism have become severely challenged and imperiled, and therefore must be seen NOT ONLY by the PDC BUT ALSO by many Barbadians as right now being in serious crisis. Indeed, many of these challenges and dangers have come about through many institutional, domestic and external causes/factors, e.g. too much an absence of aggressive, proactive strong union leadership, which itself has given way to too many companies and the state continuing to trample on some of the human rights of workers in the country; too cosy and very questionable relationships between labour, private sector and the government, which have made many Barbadians wonder about whether or not the interests of workers are being properly represented in many cases; and through some of the dire effects of globalization and trade liberalization upon our beloved country, Barbados, and which have sometimes ultimately led to a great degree of erosion in political support base of the movement.

    Furthermore, these and many more relevant effects have in turn helped influenced many Barbadian observers of certain trade union goings on in the country to correctly observe such effects helping to cause situations like the still “unresolved” Royal Shop/Sandy Lane imbroglios, like the serious and discomfiting levels of apathy and distrust among many members of the Barbadian society about becoming or remaining union members, like the situation where from time to time many union members lose their jobs during corporate restructurings and national economic crises, and many other unmentionable instances that point to labour movement crisis, and even paralysis, in Barbados. But, the point remains that trade unionism and labour organization are in dire straits at this stage. Where we in PDC are concerned, such a crisis is indicated when, et al, May Day is NO LONGER seen by multitudes of citizens as being of any significant historical value to the country; when the BWU, in having its recent 2008 May Day Parade, had to deal with plenty scenes, reminiscent of Kadooment Day, in which many people were indulging in party revelry – on such a supposedly important workers day – on several points in the parade route – when it was clearly known by the union’s leadership that by having loud soca music on the route that that would invite the accustomed esp younger party goers to party NOT to hear many important messages about the labour movement; and when it was being seen that there were too many sightings of the involvement of corporate Barbados in the parade itself – and which could have given some confusing impressions to many people about what unionism really stands/ought stand for in Barbados. So, there was the BIG, UNSIGHTLY and TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE Chefette TRADE LOGO in the back ground of the speakers on the platform of the rally itself. WHO REMEMBERS THAT IT IS THE SAME SIR ROY TROTMAN THAT HAS PREVIOUSLY CHIDED CHEFETTE FOR ITS INABILITY TO GIVE THE WORKERS A GREATER SHARE OF THE FINANCIAL PIE, GIVEN THAT IT HAS BEEN THE CASE THAT CHEFETTE HAS BEEN EXPANDING BUT SEEMINGLY AT THE EXPENSE OF INCREASED INCOME FOR THE WORKERS AND AT THE EXPENSE OF FINDING PROPER TRANSPORTATION FOR MANY OF ITS LATE NIGHT STAFF???. TALK ABOUT SERIOUS MISTRUST BY MANY BARBADIANS CONCERNING MANY PRIVATE SECTOR PEOPLE AND GOVERNMENT PEOPLE AND THE UNIONS????

    Finally, the PDC strongly believes that a partial but overwhelming response to this serious crisis in the labour movement in Barbados involves an entire paradigmatic shift in the direction of the ownership and management of the industrial affairs of the country. Hence, a future PDC Government shall make sure that present-day workers ( WHATEVER WORKER ROLES) become PART-OWNERS in the enterprises that they would be operating in, then. Hence, NO longer will these persons be workers BUT PART-OWNERS of these enterprises/organizations. Also, present day-managers, supervisors (ROLES), etc. will also become PART-OWNERS of these enterprises/organizations – which shall be PARTNERSHIPS – and which too shall be the ONLY national multi-member corporate business entities allowed in this country under a PDC regime. These PARTNERSHIPS will evolve from the Ministry of the State, Statutory Enterprises and State-owned private companies and shall evolve from all private sector companies and corporations/and current partnerships. Such PARTNERS shall be remunerated in profits (NEVER WAGES), shall each have a fair and democratic say in the running of these PARTNERSHIPS, and shall have a fundamental right to all types of information relative to the affairs of the PARTNERSHIPS. Directors shall be elected by these PARTNERS to run the day to day affairs of these businesses. Among other things, such fundamental and proper changes in the ownership and management of the industrial affairs of this country shall truly mean such persons having a greater stake in the affairs of
    these enterprises and, by extension, the country. Surely, those are some real solutions – conceptually, to the labour movement crisis that we have in Barbados!!

    PDC


  8. Knight of the Long Knives // May 21, 2008 at 4:07 pm

    The unions definitely need to be held in check. Does of us in management positions in unionised companies know well how high handed unions are especially defending the vast quantity (not all) of lazy, dishonest union delegates and their cohorts, who are defended steadfastly by the union for no other reason than that they are delegates. In the company I work with and in most hotels (I know because I speak to other management people in other companies) 75-90% of delegates are the worst employees.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    I agree with you totally, at first I thought that worked the same place, in gov’t places don’t make any money but the “delegates” still steal it like crazy and then the union (BWU) just defends them like crazy. I know cause were I work one was recenly fired for stealing $998.00 and they tried to make it look like nothing. The union means well and does a lot for some, but a lot of people only join to have that power that makes them and others feel that they are untouchable, but the union has to fix its foot soldiers to really the job done effectively.

    Transporter


  9. Everyone would love a double digit wage increase but I think that we have to be cautious with that, we don’t want to have huge increases and then layoffs months after. Better safe that sorry in this case. Cost of living is effecting the entire world, as well as food shortages and increases, we have to stop trying to live the big life and slow done a bit. Concentrate on our needs and not our wants as much.

    Until…………..


  10. On msnbc.msn.com, the news is that the so-called price of oil on the world market yesterday reached US $ 134 per barrel for July delivery of US Light sweet crude on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Such an increasingly terrifying high value for oil on the world market is going to have more severe domestic implications, in the medium to long term, for the cost of living, the cost of doing business, the value of imports of goods and services into Barbados, the balance of payments and the GDP growth of the country, given the type of oppressive imperialist neo-liberal political, economic and financial system existing at the international level.

    It is said by the same international news website that about a year ago the so-called price for the same brand of oil, on presumably the same New York Mercantile Exchange, was US $ 66 per barrel. Such a contrast is absolutely horrifying and revolting!! Whereas there has been much debate in Barbados concerning why oil has been rising so dramatically on the world market, what is so very important for many Barbadians to observe right now is that both DLP and BLP do NOT have a damn clue as to how to manage the worst fall out that WILL come our way from such massive increases in the so-called price of oil on the world market.

    Also, what is also very grave, politically, is that the DLP lied to the people of Barbados in order to help them win the last election. The DLP during the last election campaign told the people of Barbados that it was going to within the first 100 days remove VAT off electricity, remove VAT off building material for houses from BDS $ zero to BDS $ 400 000 (pg 9 of its 2008 Election Manifesto), and introduce an Agriculture Protection Act (pg 42 of its Election Manifesto). The Prime Minister of Barbados told the Barbados Chamber of Commerce and Industry soon after winning the election that
    the cost of living was his government’s first three priorities. Yet, in every nook and cranny in this country the political sign is clear that far from the cost of living being so important to this DLP Government, it seems that, for them, the cost of living is becoming a largely UNTOUCHABLE, AVOIDABLE ISSUE. Furthermore, so grave is Barbados’ economic and financial situation becoming that poultry farmers in Barbados are threatening to take to the streets to vent their anger and frustration at the government over its policies toward them, and also there are reports that many more businesses than normal at his time are closing down in Bridgetown.

    But, there is hope still for better in the future, for many more Barbadians must come and join the People’s Democratic Congress (PDC) and help us secure the further growth and development our party, as we continue to correctly state that a future PDC Government shall make sure that ALL TAXATION, INTEREST RATES, MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE, EXCHANGE RATES PARITIES WITH THE BARBDAOS DOLLAR ARE ABSOLUTELY ABOLISHED IN THIS COUNTRY, AND WHICH SHALL MAKE SURE TOO THAT IMPORTS OF GOODS AND SERVICES INTO THIS COUNTRY ARE ZERO-“PRICED” AT ALL POINTS OF ENTRY, THAT EXPORTS ARE PAID FOR IN LOCAL CURRENCY/”PRICES”, THAT INSTITUTIONAL LOANS FOR PRODUCTIVE PURPOSES SHALL BECOME NON-REPAYABLE , AND THAT THERE SHALL BECOME THE SETTING UP OF A NATIONAL HIRE PURCHASE RELIEF FUND, AMONG SO MANY OTHER VERY IMPORTANT POLICY MEASURES THAT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED BY SUCH A GOVERNMENT.

    PDC

  11. Banned from BFP Avatar
    Banned from BFP

    Sure strike out at the unions. Our contingent of profiteers are the most honest, least likely to exploit people types in the world.

    Why not have the landlords hold strain. Why not have the service providers and consultants (insurance, legal, auditing, IT etc) hold strain. Why not have the retail people not mark up on increases to their costs but simply pass the increases through to the market? Why not advocate on cutting back on unnecessary foreign exchange spending, like buying race horses in Florida, overseas travel, car racing, purchasing of gas guzzling cars etc.?
    Why not tighten up in those areas where business activity takes place involving Barbados properties and the amount of foreign exchange that comes to the Central bank is marginal?

    Suppose attacking labour is easiest. Typical, what should you expect from a lazy people.


  12. Banned from BFP you have missed the point of our blog. If you read other blogs we have posted you will see that the issue of the private sector has been tackled several times as well as as the role of government. We have used this recent blog to highlight the changing role the labour movement maybe expected to play going forward. there is a reason why the backs of the unions have been broken in the industrialized countries of the world.

    Please reread :-).

  13. Banned from BFP Avatar
    Banned from BFP

    David
    Sorry. Wasn’t attacking the blog just the flavour of the responses. I am still new to your site, (I am a rejected one site blogger). I appreciate that you have shown a broader take on this whole economic response thingy. Thanks though for not having my “comment await moderation” like your Big-Brother counterpart.


  14. Some persons inside and outside of Barbados are still wondering how a future PDC Government will go about ABOLISHING TAXATION in Barbados, given that it seems so incomprehensible to them, as they often puzzlingly but a little conclusively ask us, ” and how are education, health, police, road building, among other things, in Barbados going to be financed when you do that”.

    Well, part of our answer lies in the fact of the existence of a very monied but properly redefined core financial system of Barbados – which will also be introduced by such a future PDC Government. But, check Mr. Hilford Murrell’s last piece in the Barbados Business Authority, on pg 18 of Monday, May 19, 2008, and you will see a measure of insight into what we in PDC are talking about we say a future PDC Government is going to Abolish ALL TAXATION in Barbados. Mr. Murrell clearly rationally writes – quite unfortunately he does not say where he would have got this information from – unless he is extrapolating such information from the individual annual financial statements of the relevant financial institutions that are published locallly, and adding 2 and 2 – that “the pattern of sustained growth enjoyed by the banking sector over the last few years was evidenced in the increase of the combined asset base. Total commercial bank assets increased to BDS $ 12. 8 bilion from BDS $ 11.40 billion, in the process recording 12.2 percent growth over the 2007 published figures”.

    Assuming that these figures are an accurate representation of the nominal values of the activities that really took place in the banking sector over the last year, these figures presented by Mr. Murrell are NOT surprising to us, even though they may be staggering to many individuals in Barbados. Therefore, a good reading of the whole of his last piece does provide enough evidence that, when compared with the average annual nominal GDP of Barbados for the last ten years, that such an asset base is about TWICE THE SIZE OF THAT AVERAGE NOMINAL GDP OF BARBADOS FORTHE SAID LAST TEN YEARS – about BDS $ 6 billion, and that that is further and greater justification for TAXATION BEING ABOLISHED by a future PDC Government, partly on the basis that, among other very important strategies to be implemented by such a government, institutional loans ( from commercial banks, credit unions etc.) for productive purposes shall be deemed non-repayable, and in that way shall assist tremendously in the rapid but productive circulation of money/value through out the productive and distributive sectors of the country.

    While he did provide any information on the movement of liabilities from commercial banks to depositors, and thus information on how much money value people in Barbados command at given points in time, one only has to go to pg 12, of this same news paper, and draw a little conclusion from a snippet of news provided about First Caribbean International Bank (FCIB): that the Bank’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended October 31, 2007, show that whereas FICB Barbados total assets increased by BDS $ 108.1 million, from BDS $ 5.09 billion in 2006 to BDS $ 5.20 billion last year, its total liabilities also increased, by BDS $ 26 million from BDS $ 4.76 billion in 2006 to BDS $ 4.79 billion last year, with customer deposits accounting for BDS $ 4.61 million of that number last year compared to BDS $ 4.43 million the year before.

    Indeed, thousands of people in Barbados, inspite of a very wicked political economic financial system (TAXATION, INTEREST RATES REGIMES etc. ) in the country, are still able to possess such money/value to do so many things, with these financial institutions NOT TAXING ANY BODY, AND YET BEING ABLE TO, WITH THE LESS THAN RIGHT INCENTIVES AND CONDITIONS (NOT INTEREST RATES AND REPAYABLE INTITUTIONAL LOANS THOUGH) IN PLACE, POSSESS FAR MORE MONEY THAN THE STATE WHICH WICKEDLY TAXES PEOPLE – ANOTHER CLEAR SIGN ABOUT HOW SOME PEOPLE IN BARBADOS ARE VIEWING THIS WICKED TAXATION SYSTEM WHICH MANY OF THEM DONT LIKE. What is also interesting is that Mr. Murrell’s analysis does NOT even incorporate information from esp. the local credit union movement to further buttress our case for the Abolition of TAXATION.

    Finally, in PDC using this information to help illustrate that TAXATION shall be Abolished by a future PDC Government, we do also wish to illustrate how wicked and abominable these locally adapted Western TAXATION and financial systems are in substantially oppressing and destroying on an ongoing basis many of the affairs of the masses aand middle classes of people of Barbados.

    PDC


  15. Inadvertencies: paragraph 4, line 1 – insert “NOT” between did and provide; and, paragraph 4, line 2 – insert “NO” between thus and information.

    PDC


  16. we (civil servants) need an increase at lease by 18% ’cause that’s how much the cost of living has increased by but the reality is, we know it is not possible. one reason is that Arthur administration commissioned a mocked regrading some years ago, purposely regarding those who was regraded about 10 years before that, making sure he and his friends (that he placed in high positions in government} got their high salaries. clerical officers, maids, messengers, typists, secretaries never got regraded. so government had 2 regradings and each time THE VERY SAME PEOPLE (with the exception of a few, nursery attendants e.g) got regraded. it never bothered the Arthur administration that the essential fibre of government were being unfaired. salaries were increased acrossed the board so when we at the bottom got a $50 increase the ones at the top got around $1000. it is upsetting to know that even though we should be getting an increase of at least 18%, it is not going to be possible. A typist in government must meet certain requirements in order to be appointed, a maid only needs to have English, yet there is not much difference in their salaries. Not that i am diminishing the worth of the maid but if you require a typist to have shorthand, computer skills and three CXCs and/or a Secretarial Diploma – then respect them enough to match their take home pay with their qualifications. typists, clerical officers and secretaries are the backbone of government yet receive crap to take home. When will someone care enough to change this situation?


  17. What is happening with the Sandy Lane Royal Shop dispute?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading