Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

bwu.jpg
Source: Nation Newspaper

I read your blog every day and though I do not always agree with your opinions I do see the need for your blog and I find you much less biased that BFP which is why I am writing to you. I hear there is a strike looming which could possibly become a national strike and I am personally shocked at the lack of action taken to avert this strike by our new government. Maybe it’s that I am used to Owen’s politics where he would personally intervene in order to avert a strike as he has done on numerous occasions even just before the elections but is not leadership what we want in a prime minister….someone who even if it is not their business would get involved? any feedback whether by email or in an article would be appreciated.

Submitted by BU reader, the opinion expressed above is not necessarily shared by BU.

We have always held the view that the tripartite social partnership comprised of government, private sector and union is a contrived arrangement orchestrated by the master of inclusion, the late Owen Seymour Arthur. Its touted success was derived more for political expediency which has benefited government and private sector at the expense of workers for its duration. Key players in the union and private sector have been rewarded by the master of inclusion. The workers in our opinion have been disadvantaged over the years by this two headed master who has operated under the guise of government and private sector. To be further explored at a later date.

To the issue at hand — the threat of a national strike looms on Wednesday 20, 2008. Whether it happens or not the economy of Barbados would be negatively affected. Cruise ships would have adjusted their itineraries as well as forward bookings by people wanting to travel to Barbados. It begs the question why has this issue reached boiling point so quickly.

We wish to examine the Royal Shop issue. This popular jewelery store with locals and tourists alike has been operating in Barbados for decades. Feedback to BU indicates that this family owned business has been managed well enough to have several employees who have worked for over 10 years in its employ. To our mind the long tenure of many of the Royal Shop workers does not mesh with the view that Sir Roy and his band would have us believe. The obvious question continues to be raised; why has this problem escalated so quickly?

Based on the information at our disposal, we have to place most of the blame on the back of the Barbados Workers union (BWU). We know from our usual reliable sources that the owner of Royal Shop invited the employees who walked off the job to return. The BWU insisted that it must be all or nothing. Remember that the employees had earlier engaged in a wildcat strike. The owner insisted that they would allow all employees to return to their jobs without prejudice excluding the worker who refused to accept the transfer. Remember that the transfer was nothing new to the company which has operated from multiple locations for several years now. The BWU from the listed events failed to encourage or initiate standard grievance procedures. No way does any competent union refuse to engage the employer at the onset of industrial unrest!

The unfortunate occurrence in this episode is likely to be the fact that several long standing employees of the Royal Shop, guided by the BWU, stand a real chance of losing their jobs over this fiasco. They would have done so because of the bugling of the Barbados Workers Union. Their only crime would have been that they innocently thought that they were showing solidarity to a work colleague, Kimberly Beckles. If this were a 100 or 200 hundred employee strong company with a list of industrial relations violations, we might understand the heavy handed tactics of the Grand Ole Juke of York. In this case we are talking about a small family owned business which has existed on Broad Street for many years. Given its relatively small size the current confrontation between the BWU and Royal Shop makes it impossible that the striking workers could ever consider a return to their jobs. It can never be business as usual.

Sir Roy must have known that to inject the hard-nose negotiating tactics for which he has become famous would not have worked, and is better suited to solving the cane field disputes of yesteryear. The resources which have had to be wasted by companies in Barbados to create a contingency plan in anticipation of the national shutdown on Wednesday should be deemed a criminal act. We anticipate that that if the strike goes forward it will be responsible for a nasty stain on Sir Roy’s legacy.

Related Reading

Sandy Lane To Fly In Strike Breakers?

Who Striking Wednesday?

 


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

106 responses to “Sir Roy Trotman, Grand Ole Duke of York Up To His Old Tricks ~ National Strike Looms In Barbados”


  1. It is hard to accept that events played out the way it is been stated. I have always sided with the worker in Barbados, as over the years there has been little for me to substantially change my view of the Barbadian employer as high handed elitist and selfish people, but this incident and the way it is being reported makes it hard for me to side with the workers and the Union.


  2. Good point Adrian, my friend. Methinks that you are beginning to understand that the world is not round, but flat.

  3. Watching & Waiting Avatar
    Watching & Waiting

    I hear that our new brand PM is to meet with the Social Partners tomorrow where I hope this matter is settled. A general strike would be disastrous for Barbados so early in the life of a new administration and could well set the industrial climate for the next five years.

    While I am all for workers rights, being a worker myself, we do not need this disruption and the possible fallout. Like the contributor to the blog I am puzzled as to why we are being taken to the brink before someone steps in to pull us back.


  4. Linchh // February 18, 2008 at 9:54 pm

    Good point Adrian, my friend. Methinks that you are beginning to understand that the world is not round, but flat.
    ==============================

    ha ha ha ha Reality is my guide, and my observations keeps me in tune with reality. So the world is indeed round and not flat, the nice little metaphor is wrong on all counts. There will always be a time for change, and history often repeats it self. Every function of this earth is CYCLICAL and that makes it round. 😀

    One day i will change my views of Local employers, but this incident does not make it that day. 😀


  5. The new David Thompson administration should let Sir Roy boil in his own juices.

    The DLP has no reason to intervene on the side of Sir Roy.

    The people were fired, let them look for other jobs. I am sure that this is not the first job that they will be fired from.

    If Sir Roy calls an islandwide strike all the new PM has to do is to declare a state of Emergency and lock up all Union people.

    Sir Roy is a born trouble maker. This is the same Sir Roy who voted with the opposition BLP and brought down the Erskine Sandiford Government. David Thompson must not let Sir Roy bring down his new administration.

    If it is trouble he is looking for then lock him to hell up.


  6. I agree with David and Adrian.

    My normal instinct is with the workers who tend to be the less powerful in a dispute. But one of the disturbing aspects of this dispute is the vandalism that has been part of the dispute.

    There is an unsavoury air of intimidation. It would not be too extreme to say that in calling a general strike for a very local incident, this intimidation is being spread to the rest of us. The message is clear. Might is right. Partnership is dead.

    When it was a local dispute it was a local dispute, but a General Strike makes it a national issue and the Government carries responsibility for protecting the interests of us all. What should it do?


  7. David,
    There are a number of fundamental problems with Barbados. Many of these relate to a number or square pegs in round holes.

    Everyone knows about them – at the prison, the fire service, the police force, ministry of education, Housing etc etc.

    The REAL problem is that we have this way of ‘patching up problems’ created by these square pegs rather that dealing with ‘right-sizing’ the pegs.

    This foolishness of the Union bullying its way through spineless employers and being bailed out by the PM on the many occasions when it is clearly wrong, must stop.

    Why should we be saddled with the kind of 19th century bullying that Sir Roy characterizes when a man like Bobby Morris is available to operate professionally?

    Why should our Prison be operated the way we have seen in the last Inquiry (waste of taxpayers money) – and we just spent 300 million dollars to bail the jokers out?

    If leaders at the QEH cannot produce the desired results why do they continue in place?

    If Water works cannot come to grips with the challenges faced how come we persist with the same leaders there?

    Prime Minister Thompson should act decisively in this case – not to bail out Trotman and ‘patch up’ the debacle that has been created – but to DECISIVELY PUNISH the clear incompetence and poor management displayed.

    The law should be activated to severely deal with any idiocy of holding the nation to ransom over this nonsense.

    On the same note, strong action MUST be taken to let all ‘leaders’ be aware that RESULTS are what count and that incompetence will be punished.

    …nothing sends this message like a clear, uncompromising statement from the PM; clear legal action to back up his words; and decisive action to bring the ‘crookery’ in the last administration to light- and where necessary – to justice.

    What strike what?!!


  8. From my vantage point, I cannot comment on whether the current impending strike is warranted. However, there are certain truths that Bushtea has enunciated, that cannot be refuted about our society. I heartily endorse the points below that he made in his last post.

    There are a number of fundamental problems with Barbados. Many of these relate to a number or square pegs in round holes.
    Everyone knows about them – at the prison, the fire service, the police force, ministry of education, Housing etc etc.
    The REAL problem is that we have this way of ‘patching up problems’ created by these square pegs rather that dealing with ‘right-sizing’ the pegs.

    Why should our Prison be operated the way we have seen in the last Inquiry (waste of taxpayers money) – and we just spent 300 million dollars to bail the jokers out?

    If leaders at the QEH cannot produce the desired results why do they continue in place?

    If Water works cannot come to grips with the challenges faced how come we persist with the same leaders there?

    On the same note, strong action MUST be taken to let all ‘leaders’ be aware that RESULTS are what count and that incompetence will be punished.


  9. Trotman is a bully, unfortunately he suffers from the “shortman syndrome”

    I believe that the union must learn to train the their reps properly, and let them know that THEY are the workers and any problems must be reported to the union and the unless they are sanctioned by the union, then any strike is illegal, and the any employer that gives them a half hour or an hour to get back to work is actually doing them a favour. The union must realise that they can’t bully all the employers in Barbados. Being in the union does not mean that you can do as you like


  10. Oh finally! For years I have been saying the Union has been doing a lot of folly and thought I was the only person with some vision- in the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king- doesn’t quite work when the blind people shooting in all directions. If I were so drunk as to wake up one day and decide I don’t like my job what is the fastest way to get rid of it then by all means I side with the Royal Shop girl.
    As far as the Sandy Lane fella, he didn’t do anything wrong and you know what, he STILL has his job. Now who ignorant?
    Back to the Royal Shop thing now. I happened to be passing during last week’s protest and had to stop myself from skinning teeth in their faces when I saw the placards ’12 workers dismissed’ all I was doing was counting-
    13, 14, 15, 16.


  11. It is easy at times to allow our personal feelings about individuals to cloud our judgment, but with effort we should resist that temptation.

    Sir Roy is leader of the Union and as union leader he no doubt has made mistakes in the past, but one must put him to one side. As it serves no purpose to see the employees punished because of Sir Roy.

    In industrial disputes there always has to be give and take, there are no absolutes, the last one standing attitude is good for the bear pit, but not for good industrial relations, it leads to anarchy.

    If I was the Prime Minister, I would listen to what both parties have to say, as he has to know the facts before any action is taken. I would then simply explain the consequences of a general strike to Barbados and then re-assess the position in light of their respective responses.

    Barbados is a small tight-nit island and it is very easy for events to get out of hand. Let cool heads prevail, talk of locking people up and so on does the situation no good, neither does damage to employer’s property.

    This is a time for “cool heads” a time for reflection not rhetoric and however incensed we are, think of Barbados first.


  12. We agree that cool heads must prevail around the bargaining table. We also agree that wider Barbados must send a strong message to Sir Roy and the union that the country should not be used as a pawn in his little game.

    At this point it is impractical to rehire the 12 workers at Royal Shop. Negotiate attractive packages for them and let us move on. In the case of Sandy Lane he should do the same thing. These workers were warned in November 2007 that if they walked off the job again without permission they would be disciplined. They did it again!


  13. I think the Union bit off more than they can chew and now are trapped by their own rhetoric. Why has there been no picketing at the gates of Sandy Lane? Is it because the Holetown police may take a different approach?
    For me it seems the workers were in the wrong and therefore nothing can change this. If Sir Roy had begged management to give them a chance then I can see maybe an end to this.


  14. While it is real easy to agree with all the sentiments above, I wonder what this means for our island? I do not see why any PM should get involved in outing fires since I never could imagine what Arthur used to do or say that no one else could. Maybe this is how we see ourselves, looking for a maximum leader to solve our issues.
    From the sketchy details one can gather from the media, I do not see how anyone can side with the union in this instances or these cases.
    Trotman’s tactics seem a bit archaic but it must be real hard to admit when one is wrong.


  15. Instance,


  16. Many intresting comments above. Could not agree with you more David when you say “We also agree that wider Barbados must send a strong message to Sir Roy and the union that the country should not be used as a pawn in his little game”. For too long Sir Roy has been using this radical “do as i say or else” attitude. its time for him to move on and let someone else taken the head of BWU


  17. “The Union is still king!”

    Sir Roy is not the issue. Were the workers dismissed with cause and in accordance with the current labor laws? Some of these foreign adventurers need to be broken.


  18. Perhaps the Grand Old Joke of York will get to the punchline at last. There are no “issues” at Royal Shop or Sandy Lane. The workers in question and the Union are clearly in the wrong. What is at stake is the BWU making a very bold statement to Mr. Thompson that the Union is in charge, and that Mr. Trotman is, in fact, the unelected dictator of the island. Looking back at just a few instances the island suffered a few shortages of sugar because Mr. Trotman told the Port workers to go slow and the ships with sugar by-passed us. A sugar island with no sugar? if that isn’t a supreme joke I don’t know what is. The same Mr. Trotman trotted down to Intel and told that company who was in charge. Intel left, taking away a lot of really good jobs. Oh yes, Mr. Trotman was in charge, willing to sacrifice a lot of really good jobs just to make the point that he could dictate the employment climate in Bim. Step back from the painting for just a minute. Barbados has a very large and dense population. That population is extremely well educated, not only by local standards but by international standards as well. Yet so very many are employed in menial jobs in the various “service” industries, getting a barely living wage. We blame the evil colonial past for our current condition, and we employ people like Mr. Trotman to correct these past wrongs. Now let us look at Hong Kong and Singapore, two absolutely thriving world-class economies, and derived from exactly the same evil colonial British background. Why are we failing, still enslaved, providing menial service to the British (now as tourists and major landowners) instead of using our inherent good human capital to create the Hong Kong of the Atlantic world? Perhaps union leaders more concerned with their own personal power, and politicians more concerned with lining their own pockets and basking in the power of office have served us badly, maintaining a system of exploitation of workers instead of working to create a climate of opportunity by encouraging free-enterprise capitalism (which is what drives Hong Kong and Singapore). Instead of decrying private profit, and thus precluding the influx of capital needed to drive the economy forward to create high-paying jobs, leaders need to put the welfare of the general populace ahead of their own personal gain. Just to repeat, Hong Kong and Singapore came from precisely the same British colonial past as did we, with the same level and degree of exploitation. Why have they succeeded and we not? What is different?
    A general strike? Oh my god, we will soon resemble France, what a wonderful model for Barbados, NOT!!!!!!!


  19. Yes, degap, they were dismissed with good cause and in accordance with current labour laws. Now, what?


  20. Degap….
    Yes actually. They refused to return to their work when asked to by their employer. They should have let the Union deal with the then ONE dismissal.
    Even in the case of the 1st girl, she should have complied then complain. The Union always tells its members to do the thing “under protest” & let us deal with it. She was wrong. It was nothing life threatening that she was asked to do.

    The Union should have safe guarded itself by letting the other workers resume duties. You Never refuse to have people maintain employment. Is the Union going to find those people jobs now?

    And does anybody realise that if those women dont go and apply for unemployment, they will lose benefit? If this drags on for 6 months and they dont apply, they will lose ALL benefits. Has their caring Union told them that!?


  21. Royal Shop: The young lady who was to be transferred was the Union leader at Royal Shop. Since she came into their employ she managed to get 11 of 15 employees to sign up as members of the BWU. This in turn prompted Mrs. Thani after receiving the letter of recognition to go around harassing employees as to their status of union members. In retaliation she transferred Ms. Beckles to the Cruise Terminal branch where she would have steady work in season but after April she would on an average work 2 days in a week. Ms. Beckles refused the transfer and turned up for work at Broad Street where she was dismissed immediately. No warning, no suspension just dismissal. The employees walked off in solidarity with Ms. Beckles. The employees were ordered to return to work but they refused to return unless all were allowed to return to work. This led to the dismissal of all the employees protesting the dismissal of Ms. Beckles. The Indian community has thrown full support behind The Royal Shop because they feel threatened by Unionized workers in their organizations. The workers in Barbados need to throw support behind fellow Barbadian workers who are treated badly, unfaired, disrespected and dismissed without due process and good reason. The workers need to make a stand and nip this type of situation in the bud. Don’t judge based on media reports. Come out and hear the real issues by your fellow workers. Sandy Lane’s post is next.


  22. Sandy Lane: At Sandy Lane, it just isn’t about the police grabbing up a worker and questioned and home searched and plastic pulled over his head and baygon sprayed as a form of interrogation tactic. It has to do with the workers putting up with nonsense for several months. Employees knocked off a golf cart by a drunken manager. Manager shipped backed home and nothing coming out of the police report but a quick sweep under the carpet. A Russian guest threatening to beat an employee and calling him “nigger” and management giving the guest the right in the situation and agreeing with the racial taunting. Enough of that. An intoxicated guest who had an UNDECLARED large sum of Euro apparently reported this money missing. A maid earlier in the morning reported the safe being open in the room while she was carrying out her duties/ which from my understanding meant that the safe was never used by the guest. The money if ever was missing has apparently been returned. This is the second time this particular guest has pulled this prank in order to get a free nights stay at the hotel. Anyway this accusation led to the summoning of police to Sandy Lane where they took this employee in for questioning in the matter. He was questioned/gassed and home searched and no money was recovered or evidence attained during questioning/gassing. On his return in his gassed state the management suggested he wasn’t looking too well and he it was in his best interest to attend a doctor and take some time home. The workers walked off the job to protest the treatment by the management to their fellow worker and was dismissed claiming they broke an agreement signed in November with the BWU. There is so much incidents reported by employees at Sandy Lane that I would have to create a Sandy Lane blog just to cover it all. Sir Roy does at time appear to apply hard hand tactics in his negotiations but when dealing with these types of employers it is the only proven method that works. Barbadians must protect themselves not only against these foreign business people coming here and treating Barbadians like scum but we must send a message to everyone that workers’ rights are human rights and they must be respected. So much is brewing and we must use this opportunity in order to get this type of abused put into law so that we can lock up these criminals that come here with the intent to exploit Barbadian workers. All kinds of roaches have come out with opinions about this matter without even trying to hear the facts. All kinds of business men begging for the strike to be averted but they only mentioning the money lost but up to now no one in interested in you the worker. Strike Monday unless The Prime Minister can settle this dispute. Come out and support your colleagues.


  23. Let me further clarify my position. My current position against the workers and the Union is base on the information we have, unbelievable as it is. I however will not be calling for any punitive or long term punishment or censure of the Unions, which seems to be the attended intent of some who may have always held the viewed that the Union is the enemy. Employers in Barbados have a highly reckless history that i believe continues today so much so that Unions are very much still necessary in Barbados. The Unions may have got it wrong this time but the Employer has not change his/her tune over the years.


  24. TheTrashHeap // February 19, 2008 at 9:06 am

    Royal Shop: The young lady who was to be transferred was the Union leader at Royal Shop. Since she came into their employ she managed to get 11 of 15 employees to sign up as members of the BWU.
    ============================

    Is this true? was she targeted because she was encouraging her collegues to unionize? As i said before the reports i have been getting makes this whole thing unbelievable, but if what you are saying is indeed the case then it would make sense, because this is an old tactic of Bajan Employers.


  25. “Militancy is in the air”

    TheTrashHeap thanks for the info….

    It sounds like the union organizer was facing reprisals for unionizing the store. In that case, the other workers did the right thing in showing solidarity. Workers have the freedom of association, and should be free so to do without harassment. With Sandy Lane, I have a bigger problem with the police, but if this same guest has a history of having his money “stolen”, I’m marching with Sir Roy.


  26. TheTrashHeap // February 19, 2008 at 9:26 am

    Sandy Lane: At Sandy Lane, it just isn’t about the police grabbing up a worker and questioned and home searched and plastic pulled over his head and baygon sprayed as a form of interrogation tactic. It has to do with the workers putting up with nonsense for several months.
    ==============================

    While these things are very serious and i would know, having worked at Sandy Lane as a Night Auditor in the very early 90’s i can attest to some of these behaviours, once having to spell out in no uncertain terms to a guest who was belligerent and threathening,cthat it was impossible for him or any visitor to Barbados to win a fight with me. The difference then was we had a Barbadian General Manager name Richard Williams who would not tolerate rudeness from employee to guest or the other way around, Indeed once we witness him throwing a very wealthy guest out of the Hotel for being rude to staff. Anyway all that said, there is no room for wild cat strikes none. If the staff did indeed go such a strike what can you offer as a plausible excuse that a fair and balance person like me can bite into and find solidarity with your cause?


  27. As i have said in the past. Workers in Barbados need to link CSME to how workers are treated. One of the rationals behind CSME is to expand the local market to a regional one so that local business can grow and strengthen as a hedge against Globalization. The argument was sold to us as CSME being needed to protect local business and jobs from globalization. I think that this is false marketing, maybe it really is to protect the business and not the jobs, in fact if i had a choice in Barbados of working for an international chain who would have set up in Barbados as result of WTO commitments vs. working for a local entity, I would take my chances with the international one, simply because of the demonstrated practices of Bajan companies in how they treat their staff, and the belief that an international company would most likely have human resource practices that respects international workers rights and labour conventions. The way that Caribbean governments and corporate entities treat their people and workers makes it easy for others to come into their space and rapidly gain market share.


  28. Thanks for your response BU, great to know that our imput is incorporated.

    it just strikes me as interesting that this is the first time in almost 13 years that we have been on the brink of a national strike.

    Two things come to mind as possible explanations for this:

    1) A lack of leadership on the part of our new government to do everything possible to avert a national strike which could cripple the country on Wednesday. I am not sure if it is the governments responsibility but think of all the money and man hours that will be lost as a result of even a strike for a day.

    2) This is a much more cynical thought, but another explanation which i would hate to beleive is that this is an attempt to destabilize our new government within the firast hundred days in office by crippling the country through a national strike.

    I’de love to hear other opinions on this!
    Chris


  29. Having read all these comments I was tempted to put in my two cents but something does not smell right here and I am going to wait until more comes out.


  30. I have learnt over the years not to trust corporate Barbados, I still don’t see a need to do so. Remember that this DLP government on thier election platform talked about progressing towards full black enfrancizement, which means as they have stated in the throne speech to liberalize the wholesale and distributive sector, there can’t be any intent to allow this to happened. The government has signal a willingness to relook at the social partnership, which has always been a oneside shop that has allowed the remanants of the planter class to enjoy unenterupted power and access. You don’t think they will sit by and allow the DLP to take away what to they mind is theirs. I believe there is merit to the concerns and statement that Thompson made in New York where he said that they are people who are bent on making life difficult for this new government. The play book may very well be similar to what Hillary Beckles endured during the Mutual affair “the economic injustices of corporate Barbados”. Will Barbados side with them against their own once again?


  31. I just outlined the facts that I got. I have learnt in the past not to pass judgment based on what I have read or heard in the media. I held back commenting until I heard directly from the horse’s mouth. I will say this, I support the Union because simply the workers in Barbados need a voice, someone to defend them. Businesses in Barbados has Dick Stoute and his Chamber of Commerce, Barbados Employers Confederation, Allan Fields, Bizzy Williams and other little roaches that come out at times like this to cry down the Trade Union Movement in Barbados claiming how damaging industrial action is and how much money they are going to lose. None of them show any interest whatsoever in the worker. Everyone calling the sided and biased moderated call in shows with opinions without fact. Everyone is consumed with an issue they can only assume they know the issue. The BWU and other trade unions is the only voice the workers have, the employers and their cronies will always try to build an image of how much damage unionized workers cause and how much it hurts me and you when we take industrial action. I just want you before you pass judgment is come and hear the facts. Not only in this case here right now but whenever the trumpet is blown for the workers, come and hear why before you come with a verdict. You may not agree with every fight, I don’t agree with every fight but everyone should have a voice that can be heard. Support your fellow worker. Time for change. Not just the government but a change in the way the Barbadian Worker is treated and looked upon in the eyes of the employer.

    The Management of Sandy Lane has continuously abused their employees, their guest as well, the high turnover rate of employees can shed some light in the environment existing within that entity. Some workers will bring these things upon themselves but in the end look at the numbers and ask yourselves the question again. Crane is another example of high turnover rates for employees. These people believe and boldly state they have enough money to do whatever they like, hire or fired whom they please and pay three times the going rate etc. It is time to take a stand, they fired 18 for standing up to there nonsense. These are people like us with families that just wanted to be treated fairly and with respect. The issues were of no concern with them, just that their guest needed breakfast and the phone needs answering.


  32. I wrote previously that in most industrial disputes the incident that has caused the strike is rarely the “main” issue, but it can be the “catalyst”, often there is a prior breakdown between staff and their employer which prevents positive interactions.

    I also ventured to suggest, that protagonists often do not give the full story as they hope to influence public opinion.

    I also cautioned for “cool heads” to prevail, since my post events have started to unfold and more information is coming to light. I can only reiterate I hope “common sense” prevails.

    It is better to be frustrated and talk than become too frustrated to talk.


  33. There still tremains a union sanctioned protocol for protest, None of these workers followed that so I unfortunately will not be siding with the union!

    Its all welll and good to generalise about business owners but there are two sides to every story and even so it still appears that they did not follow the protocols hence they lost thier jobs!

    Ultimately if they are allowed top do as they like employers will have a very difficult time requesting anything of staff!


  34. re Sandy Lane: Wel heeled tourists will always be difficult to handle and I am sure that the workers have it hard even if they get paid tons of money…STLL are wild cat strikes sanctioned by the Union . Yes or NO???? If NO then the workers were WRONG period!


  35. There is no generalization of Barbados employers, their actions and contempt for the Barbadian worker is legendary.

    Question for you (ME)

    –Was Kimberly Beckles encouraging her collegues to unionize?

    –Is there a law against such activity?

    –Was Kimberly Beckles employed at the branch of the Royal shop Broad Street with terms of 52 weeks, with full week’s pay based on an hourly rate and commission based on meeting set targets which varied monthly?

    –Would Kimberly Beckles had she agreed to the transfer been then subjected to work only from October to April on a week by week basis, and for the rest of the year, that employee would work on a casual basis of two days every two weeks, a total of 20 hours.

    –Would you having been single out for this transfer as a result of your union activity accepted this “punishment”?

    In these circumstances above, if the only defense the employer has is that the workers did not follow an agreed protocal for industrial action, then it is plausible for me to believe that the core motivating factor to this empasse is to avoid unionzing at all cost.

    This is typical behaviour of the average Barbadian employer.


  36. I know many bajan employers and they dont operate so…maybe it is the ones you know!


  37. Wildcat strike is wrong. Trade Unions will not disagree with that, but are you trying to tell me that the only route against this action is dismissal? In these organizations and other organizations people do a lot worse than protest and are not dismissed. Not any and everyone can be a leader and sorry to say they are some Union leaders who was not educated in labor relations nor understand labor relations. Sometimes these people make rash decisions which is not always best in the interest in the parties they represent. That said a bad decision may have been made and a wild cat strike may have been the result of that decision but there are avenues to deal with this issue as well. The end of the day Unionized workers are constantly under threat, employers offering hefty raises to employees to drop out of the union, elevated statuses etc. These things are also violations which can result in industrial action being taken and the unions are aware of these incidents and do take drastic action. So it rocks both ways or as the logo says “look both ways” which I try to do at all times.

    As for the attack on the new government, I thought about it, at one time I was saying it could be an attempt but under closer scrutiny I think not. I think one of the underlying issues not mentioned as yet but a key element in this action is law to protect unionized workers against victimization. In the 90s, can’t remember which year as I am getting old, there was another dispute that almost resulted in an island wide shut down. One of those offshore organizations on Harbour Rd. The Prime Minister at the time, the Honorable Owen Seymour Arthur stepped in at the 11th hour and prevented this from happening. The result of this action brought about (I can be corrected here as I said my memory isn’t what is was) an amendment to the trade union act giving workers the power to be associated with any trade union without victimization or discrimination. This still happens today and it happens because the Prime Minister at that time stopped short and did not push it through as a law so offenders could be prosecuted.

    When I saw the BWU going all out against these entities I pondered on every question that have been asked on these blogs many times before. Destabilization of the government was one finalist in my mind before I remembered the previous incident that went this far.

    Also remember Sir Roy is a DEM, this also helped me eliminate that question from my mind and reading the comments that the Prime Minister made and appeared in the paper this morning brought me to the conclusion is that when he alluded to “people” in barbados he may have but most likely did not mean the BWU.

    So much challenges employees in Barbados face on a daily basis, Cable and Wireless, BNB, Transport Board, Sea Port and Air Port, Hotel workers and all these other hot spots with the potential to explode at any time. This government says it is for the people, then this government should make it law to protect the people.

    This looks like me for the day… I am going now and prepare for strike action tomorrow.

    The Trash Heap has spoken!


  38. Thewhiterabbit
    ==============================
    Perhaps union leaders more concerned with their own personal power, and politicians more concerned with lining their own pockets and basking in the power of office have served us badly, maintaining a system of exploitation of workers instead of working to create a climate of opportunity by encouraging free-enterprise capitalism (which is what drives Hong Kong and Singapore). Instead of decrying private profit, and thus precluding the influx of capital needed to drive the economy forward to create high-paying jobs, leaders need to put the welfare of the general populace ahead of their own personal gain. Just to repeat, Hong Kong and Singapore came from precisely the same British colonial past as did we, with the same level and degree of exploitation. Why have they succeeded and we not? What is different?
    ==============================
    I believe that one of the key differences between Barbados and Hong Kong and Singapore is cultural. The population is ethnic chinese, and we should remember that in Bim we can learn a lot from a chinaman, even when we are bowled neck and crop. Also the penalty for convicted drug dealers is final and terminal.

    Why is it that we have been objecting to using the chinese to rebuild Paradise (I mean the hotel, not the mythical abode of the departed)? I seem to have forgotten, and need to be reminded.


  39. since it is so hard for the workers in Bim it must be easy for the employers…what a load of rubbish!
    After the wotrkers went on the wild cat strike they were given the opportunity to come back to work. They refused. They were offred severance, they refused! Clearly they want nothing to do wityh the royal shop! So iessence you are saying that this is about MAKING the owners of the royal job do as Sir Roy says or shut up shop!

    Well Sir roy is the most powerful man in Brabados so what do we expect?

  40. passing through south Avatar
    passing through south

    d workers still wrong.they walk out of d job and so they get fired.we have heard 2 sides of the story and now we wait to hear the truth.


  41. TrashHeap – even if everything you say is true, the fact remains that the staff took part in an illegal, wildcard strike, had an opportunity to return to work, did not, and were fired. If there were grievances, they should have been aired, voted on and strike action held legally. Not difficult or complicated to do. Now they are in the sad position of being used as pawns by Sir Roy in a bigger game and will probably end up without jobs. If they’d followed the law, they’d have had sympathy. As it stands, they’ve managed to do the almost-impossible – e.g. make Sandy Lane look good. What a bunch of idiots.


  42. Me, you seem to have it in for the Union, Sir Roy, maybe both. If you have read all the above posts you will notice no one said that the wildcat strike was the right action nor that the Union sanctioned the strike. I for one do not sanction wildcat strikes or any form of industrial action unless consultation was done with and has been sanctioned for the Union. No one has said that ALL employers in Barbados are bad but everyone even the blind know they are a lot of employers in Barbados that has little or no respect for the worker. The worker in Barbados has suffered at the hands of both White, Black, and Asian employers and at the same time some have been treated excellent and they are even some organizations that go the extra mile to make sure the employees are treated well.

    I have had the sorrow and joy to work in both environments and I will tell you that things are boiling in Barbados and there are some who are willing to challenge the Union to see how strong it really is. Tomorrow all their questions will be answered. I hear the people calling for help the same way Barbados was calling for change, the workers are crying for help and who is going to help them? Without the union the workers will perish. Employers will pick at and get rid of unionized workers one by one or twelves or eighteens until you have a workforce of 100 and 6 or less unionized workers and no voice, just a whisper. So talk all you like, if you an employee and you are happy, I am happy for you, but they are many that are unhappy and mistreated that I will march for tomorrow.


  43. You are one knowledgeable trash heap. If what you are saying is true and what I have heard is true in relation with the recovery of this money. Based on those facts, I will not say it is a wild-cat strike, but a gathering to sensitise management that we are not happy with your decision. This is a regular procedure that has been displayed by strikers. Walk off the job, let management know, call the union and as soon as the union arrived and briefed, the union will tell the workers to stand firm or return to work so that the company and union can have discussions.

    We are only hearing ramblings of who like Sir Roy, egotism, the duke of York syndrome and a whole lot of baloney. Come on people, stop jumping on a one-sided bandwagon and deal with the causes.


  44. As a fairminded employer with alot of expereince I do agree that that there are a few owners that are unfair to staff however there are also many employees with unrealistic expecetions and poor work ethics. This it seems is encoraged by the unions who DO NOT ever make positive statemnets about ANY employers. They never speak to the fact that the emoployers are who PROVIDE the jobs in the first place ( who take out the loans and fight tooth and nail to make the business succeed). So that some msigusded persons walk intio jobs looking to cause strife from the get go ( on the strength of thier union associations). Last time I checeked the union didnt pay wages to these people!

    They needs to be a better understanding of business by workers and they need to recognise that WE the employers have rights as well.

    Therefore if there is a protocol that was agreed on between the union and the employers that shuold have been be respected.

    If Sir Roy(al ) has beef wid the idians and the whites then he needs to speak clearly and deal with it. He should not hold black business men like me to ransom.


  45. After the wotrkers went on the wild cat strike they were given the opportunity to come back to work. They refused. They were offred severance, they refused!
    ……………………………………………………………………..
    Pure nonsense ME, those are not options, those are directive without solving the problems why these workers strike in the first place. Possibly, these workers were waiting for the arrival of their union before returning to work. The company was hoping these workers returned before the union arrived and fire them for leaving their work stations. That mean the workers will have no redress.


  46. You see it is wonderful in a democratic society where people can exchange opinions like us freely and openly like we are now on this blog.

    Now back to the issue. It was a directive without any opportunity to air grievances. Which any reasonable person would concur that in a situation where employees stop work in protest, the main logical thing to do is to get to the bottom of the problem and see if it can be rectified and return harmony to the workplace. This did not happen, just one directive…return to work or else!

    In Sandy Lane’s case knowing the history of the guest the benefit of the doubt should have gone to the employee in that situation and the first thing that should have been done is to verify if the money was there in the first place since it is alleged that the guest did not use the safe. Also with that amount of money, why wasn’t it declared. At no time no concern was shown for the employee by Sandy Lane.

    Do not go out and say the Union encourage nonsense. At no time in my years as a member of the Union and actively involved with the Union have I seen the Union condoned or tried to justify nonsense by any of its members. To the contrary I have seen incidents where the employer did not intend to punish an employee and the Union insisted that they be punished accordingly. That is to keep the balance because it would appear that in some of those incidents Union members can do as they like and that is not the image the Union wish to portray. If employers embraced the union instead of trying to destroy it you would see more harmony within the so called social partnership. Simple protocols within labour relations are all needed to be learnt, and applied and a lot of industrial disputes would have never gotten this far. As in the case with RoyalShop which breached at least one ILO rules.


  47. It is totally beyond the pale that a general strike should be called on the premise that “many (employees) are unhappy and mistreated”, to quote Trash Heap. Like Trotman, Trash Heap, you keep moving the goalposts. This is about two local incidents, the accounts of which have been detailed from the employers’ point of view, and not in any way refuted by the union. Unless, of course, you are the spokesman for the union. All we have seen from your writings are allegations, some of which may be true, but these are NOT the point of this current dispute. If what the employers had done was illegal, wouldn’t they be before the Court? Were the employees in both cases advised that they could return to work within a given time and refused? Royal Shop has even offered its ex-employees severance. I would never have done that. I have seen so-called union organisers biting off more than they can chew on several occasions, because they are not briefed properly by the union as to what they can or cannot do. This whole matter is a disgrace and has been blown out of all proportion by the union leadership, for what purpose, we might never know.


  48. TheTrashHeap, Or Sir Roy or whatever your name is, the whole reason there are processes and rules agreed by the unions is to prevent this sort of damaging farce. Trottman’s brinkmanship and personal agenda has played into the hands of Sandy Lane – who are probably not exactly innocent in all of this – and has ended up making the BWU look foolish. A national strike ? It’s like using a sherman tank to crack a hazelnut, and in a position where procedures were not followed, has seriously damaged the unions credibility. The real loosers will be the employees who were fired. If there are serious issues with Sandy Lane or the RoyalShop, these need to be dealt with properly, with due processand without making the employers look like saints – which they are not.


  49. Following on from the post of Tell Me Why, if I leave my workstation in a protest for ten minutes having called my Union to complain, should I be in a position to be fired by my employers? Are there no protocols in place to determine what is and what is not permissible under the law as far as taking protest action with union involvement? I do believe the BWU and the other Unions need to spend a lot more time educating workers abouth their current rights under the law, and be campaigning to have the laws changed where it is apparent that they are discriminatory to workers. And a population should be insisting that any Government in power should be passing legislation to protect workers from unfair employers, as well as ensuring that employers are protected from unreasonable employees.


  50. For some “employee’s rights” seem to be an oxymoron. I don’t think anyone who thinks reasonably would accept an environment where employees have rights or have the right to do as they like with no repercussions, so why would someone who thinks reasonably would accept an environment where employers have right or have the right to do as they like with no repercussions. A good partnership of labour relations would mean balanced responsibility for the stability of such a partnership. An environment where both employer and employee is working towards a common goal where both parties are not only striving for the betterment of oneself but also for the betterment of the other. This off course is offset by bad employers and as well as bad employees. Therefore as said above in a previous post. Law needs to be established to the bad parties on both sides can be punished and purged of all negative ills influencing bad labour relations in Barbados and the stability of our social and economic environment.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading