Go back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Warning
Warning
Warning
Warning.

Submitted by Dr. Roland Clarke
UK refused the obligation to militarily defend Barbados in 1966

Upon Barbados’ independence in 1966, the UK did not offer a formal, standing military protection agreement or defence treaty. Instead, the UK Parliament declared that it would no longer have responsibility for the government, defense, or external affairs of Barbados. [1, 2, 3, 4]

During the parliamentary debates surrounding the Barbados Independence Bill, the UK government’s position was made clear:

– No standing commitment: 

The UK did not envisage any threat of external aggression to Barbados and did not commit to automatic military intervention.

– Sympathetic consideration: 

It was stated in the House of Lords that if a situation should arise in which Barbados felt it necessary to seek assistance, the UK would “naturally expect to consider any request sympathetically in the light of the circumstances”. 

This meant requests would be considered on a case-by-case basis, rather than through a pre-agreed pact.

– Defence Force aid: 

The UK also expressed willingness to consider, with sympathy, any request for training aid for the local volunteer defence force, the Barbados Regiment. [3, 5] 

CONCLUSION

The Barbados Independence Act 1966 focused on the legal and constitutional transition to a fully self-governing, sovereign status within the Commonwealth, and did not include a specific clause for ongoing UK military protection. [1, 6, 7, 8] 

POST SCRIPT

Today, Barbados has military arrangements through the Regional Security System (RSS) (1982) which includes the UK.

That means that over the period 1966 – 1982, the training wheels were off for Barbados.

REFERENCES 

[1] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1966/37/enacted/data.html

[2] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1966/37/body

[3] https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1966/nov/10/barbados-independence-bill

[4] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1966/37/body

[5] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9898689/

[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbados_Independence_Act_1966

[7] https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/legislation/uk-parliament-acts/barbados-independence-act-1966-c37

[8] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1966/37/body

______

CURATED by Dr Roland Clarke, Barbados 

References attributed to Google AI


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 responses to “UK refused the obligation …”

  1. Political Confusion / Love & Livity Avatar
    Political Confusion / Love & Livity

    A blessed morning to all Barbajans from UK.
    Independence 66 years ago was before my lifeline but it provided some relief from the British Burden of Shame that we carry down here.
    As Manley Buchanan who is a Big Youth from the Roots Foundation would say

    “Whole of we are Africans, some are called Jamaicans, some Trinitrinitrinidanians,
    gather brothers and sisters
    to fight this battle to be the fittest of the fittest of the fittest in this race
    Knowing that no one is an island, no one stands alone
    we don’t deal with grudge and war and jealousy
    Love and harmony in the roots foundation”


  2. There has always been something wrong with a nation state expecting another to defend it. To bleed for it. There are always costs to such adventures.

    And there are other costs to a country which lacks the culture of military experience for transference to other facets of nationhood, building a survivalist ethos!

    In the alternative, historically there was always something wrong about Bajans travelling the world in defense of a colonialist Britian, even if they were merely and mainly latrine cleaners, as in WW1 & 2. Modern day mercenaries, soldiers of fortune, fail to square this circle.

    Maybe a nation state which could only so claim to exist ……….. should not! Maybe the Treaty of Wesphalia (1648) is supportive of this notion.

    This is the logic of the realist philosophy in great powers rivalry.


  3. Of course, neither war nor peace is the only option nation states have.


  4. So when has the UK ever protected Bajans?

    Wasn’t it the UK which enslaved and oppressed Bajans from 1627 to 1838?

    So how then would anybody except an idiot expect them to protect us?

    Bajans have shed their blood for the UK during the First EUROPEAN War [1914-18] and the 2nd EUROPEAN War [1939-45].

    When have the people of the United Kingdom ever shed their blood for Bajans?

    Stupssseee!!!


  5. @ David,

    When she was in opposition she sung a different tune.

    https://newsday.co.tt/2024/12/13/kamla-wants-details-about-trinidad-and-tobago-us-agreements/


  6. @TLSN

    this is the politician’s MO, everywhere. When will we learn?


  7. @TLSN

    Inquiring minds want to know why is there no Barbados High Commissioner to UK since Milton Inniss returned to Barbados early 2025?

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading