Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Dr. Roland Clarke Concerned Resident of St. Thomas Energy Consultant
Submitted by Dr. Roland Clarke

The November 27, 2025 change of government in St. Vincent and the Grenadines offers several key lessons for Barbados, primarily revolving around the electorates’ demand for economic improvement, the potential for change after a long tenure, and the need to address persistent domestic issues. 

1. KEY LESSON FOR BARBADOS

1.1 Longevity in Power is Not Permanent: 

Dr. Ralph Gonsalves’ Unity Labour Party (ULP) was in power for 25 consecutive years, one of the longest tenures in modern Caribbean history. Their significant defeat by the New Democratic Party (NDP) shows that even long-standing, seemingly entrenched governments can be voted out when voters seek a new direction, a crucial reminder for any long-serving administration, including Barbados’ current leadership.

1.2 Prioritizing Domestic Economic Concerns: 

The NDP’s campaign successfully capitalized on domestic frustrations, focusing heavily on:

– Economic stagnation

– High youth unemployment

– Cost-of-living concerns

– Slow post-disaster recovery, specifically after the La Soufrière volcanic eruption

2. THE MESSAGE FOR BARBADOS

The message for Barbados is that governments must remain highly responsive to the immediate economic pain and livelihood concerns of their citizens, as these issues can outweigh a leader’s regional or international profile.

2.1 The Importance of Generational Change and Governance: 

The winning NDP campaign also emphasized the need for generational change and better governance and transparency. This suggests a growing desire among Caribbean electorates for fresh leadership, modern approaches to governance, and increased accountability, something Barbados’ political establishment must also consider.

2.2 Navigating Regional Political Involvement: 

Operatives from Barbados’ ruling party, the Barbados Labour Party (BLP), were reportedly present in St. Vincent to assist the ULP’s campaign, which caused a stir among political observers. The political fallout from such overt support for an outgoing government could potentially affect future bilateral relations or public perception in Barbados, illustrating the sensitive nature of inter-island political campaigning.

2.3 Addressing Internal Party Grievances: 

During the campaign, Gonsalves had to address internal party grievances and “hurting” supporters, urging them to vote first and air grievances later. The ultimate loss demonstrates that ignoring or postponing the resolution of internal disaffection and constituent pain can lead to electoral consequences.

2.4 Vulnerability to “Foreign Policy” Promises: 

The winning NDP under Dr. Friday advocated for a potential shift in foreign policy, including a review of international partnerships and a potential move towards closer relations with China and a Citizenship by Investment (CBI) program. While the losing Dr. Gonsalves and the UDP favoured maintaining strong ties with Taiwan, the change in government indicates a willingness by the electorate to consider alternative foreign policy stances if they are perceived to deliver economic benefits, a relevant dynamic for Barbados’ own diplomatic and economic strategies. 

______


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

57 responses to “Lessons- SVG General Elections”


  1. Will Gonsalves retire from politics after his rejection – he won his seat, his son not so lucky. What does it say that he won?

    The Barbados scenario is a little different with a DLP opposition struggling to create a foothold and no trustworthy alternatives available. However it must be said that the dissenting voice in Barbados is getting louder.

  2. Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV Avatar
    Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV

    I think it is a case of short sightedness on Ralph’s part. Ralph may be a popular personality but EVERYONE has a shelf life in POLITICS. It happened with Owen. He was a popular PM between 1994 – 2008 but was rejected, albeit narrowly, when he reran as party leader in the 2013 election. Barrow was removed also but was reelected after a 10 year gap.
    Open and FREE democracies usually thrive on 2 stable parties that the electorate alternates. When one party is seemly weak the public will struggle with keeping the more stable party in power for a long time or going to the weaker more uncertain party. The fact of the matter is that the incumbent usually has cumulative declining support .
    Ralph should have removed himself as PM two elections ago. All the while had a succession plan in place and put a future PM in place so that at least his ULP would keep power
    The electorate decided that having 1 person in power so long is unsatisfactory. Since Ralph didn’t remove himself the electorate removed him and the party. I detect a similar thinking in Barbados. They are not too thrilled to the BLP having all 30 seats but are not attracted to the DLP. This state of affairs is not permanent. My believe is that this was the thinking behind Ms. Mottley saying she would would not have run in this upcoming election. The fact of the matter is that the DLP getting 16 seats from 0 is all but impossible. It is the election subsequent that may be the most interesting. The question is if Ms Mottley has such a succession plan


  3. What does a succession plan mean in the type of politics practiced here? Mottley may anoint who she wants, but that person will have to appeal first to the parliamentary group and to the public.

  4. Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV Avatar
    Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV

    @DavidBU i can only mean within the party within this context. Whether there would be consensus within the party is a different discussion. All candidates are subject to the whims of the electorate The point here is that even if the public sees one party as more united and attractive than the other, they do not want to see one person “hold on to power” for so long. A discussion like this would also motivate a move to term limits in Caribbean politics


  5. In the same way Mottley has cherry-picked an independent speaker narrative, what about term limits and succession planning? Can you remind the blog what her views are on these?


  6. @ David

    Having won his seat, Gonsalves is essentially the Opposition Leader. On August 8, 2026, he will be 80 years old, and 84 at the end of his term.

    He will be required to defend his 25 year tenure, oppose the ‘government,’ while representing his constituency, and addressing any concerns of its constituents.
    Such a work load would be unmanageable for a youngster, and even more so for a man Gonsalves’ age.

    Seems as though the ULP did not give any serious consideration to succession planning, perhaps because the political party’s hierarchy anticipated they would’ve won the 2025 general elections, Gonsalves resigning within a year or two of his tenure, and ‘passing the baton’ on to his son or some other chosen heir.

    However, the Comrade, acknowledging his unpopularity, will have to resign from politics eventually. The question is, will he resign immediately to force a by-election?

    Going forward, the ULP should be grooming a replacement as soon as is reasonably possible. Someone who would reform the party’s image from being tied to Gonsalves, which may require a comprehensive rebranding strategy that shifts the focus from his influence thereon, to a new party image, collective identity and unified vision.

    The new leadership should move public discourse away from Gonsalves’ personality to the party’s renewed focus.


  7. I don’t see Ralphy running again at 84 if he lives till then. The man is no spring chicken so I believe he will get his party settled and probably resign in the next year or so. This was not a close elections either and he knows it. He had a good run and can go over to Bequia now and enjoy his retirement.


  8. Bushie is here trying to rationalize why any SANE person would even want to take on the responsibility of leadership on a ‘Titanic’, that is clearly near to its critical buoyancy point… far less to fight tooth and nail to do so…

    Is it…
    For love of the poor people?
    For the opportunity to live high off the same poor people?
    For the chance to hob nob with the albino-centric demons?
    For personal aggrandizement?

    Can you help Bushie here @ Pacha?
    One would think that, faced with current challenges, a REAL leader may need to be head-hunted for competence, and enticed to come to our aid…

    Watching the lotta jokers (who have ZERO history of successful leadership and hardly anything to offer) fighting tooth and nail for these positions should indicate motive…

    It reminds Bushie of Isaiah’s prediction of a time when …
    A man will seize one of his brothers
    in his father’s house, and say,
    “You have a cloak, you be our leader;
    take charge of this heap of ruins!”
    Isaiah 3:6

    That did not end well…
    What a time!!


  9. There you have it!

    ‘Labour is very much alive,’ says former PM Gonsalves

    https://www.iwnsvg.com/2025/11/29/labour-is-very-much-alive-says-former-pm-gonsalves/


  10. The latest photos of him without the AI or Photoshop enhancement show a fatally wounded, ugly old man. Initially, I felt kind of sad for him, then I remembered all the evil that came from his being in power. Even if it was others that carried out the atrocities, it was controllable by him; he never spoke out or said anything to stop or correct situations, so he was responsible, just as if he did all that crap himself. Then, his being a control freak and a liar, all the evil was compounded by him being in charge of every square inch of SVG. Thank heavens, despite the fact that a large section of the Vincentian public were peasantised, he was a revolutionary failure when it came to finishing the work of Maurice Bishop. Biggs, Alban, myself and many others suffered in SVG due to him. People left the state to go overseas and safety, people were assassinated, and people disappeared. Thank goodness Julian was smitten and could not conduct the elections anymore; otherwise, I think this election would have been conducted differently. I do care about the continuing existence of ULP if it involves the Gonsalves. I would not object or even comment if it could be for sure that no member of the Gonsalves family was conducting it. I think the supporters should wise up and start a new party without the Gonsalves. I still want to know how they got stinking rich over the last 25 years while everyone else got stinking poor. Now is the time for in-depth investigations to start in every department of government. including tax investigations and comparison investigations between Trinidad and SVG. The state auditor, who has been behind in the auditing for years, must now be forced to bring things up to date, and it may even be appropriate to bring in an independent firm of auditors to look at everything again and report to government. SVG deserves better than to assume a business-as-usual stance, investigations are important to the people and the state.


  11. One thing the motley Mottley PM need to learn is her place and not to interfere in other countries’ elections. Her behaviour in this matter put her in the scum groupage.


  12. Yugge Farrel must be happy?

    Will Barbadians see the uselessness of neglecting to hold public officials accountable and its consequences?


  13. Lightweight!

    In the first place any government system anywhere experiences a similar life cycle. And the Gonzales regime has finally been overtaken by an implicit inertia.

    The writer talks about this issue as if we’ve not seen this pattern repeating itself over and over again, in many places, over hundreds of years.

    More importantly, the ULP and the NDP are both members of the same duopoly. This relationship means the acquisition of all the problems supposed left by the ULP and represents the inheritance of the winning NDP.

    Indeed, the ULP, even after 25 years, may contend that they too inherited a range of problems left by predecessor regimes. Of course, the NDP will spend the next ten years opining about the problems left them by the ULP. A vicious cycle best ignored by the author.

    Of course, he also included a matter about BLPites going to SV&G to help the ULP, evidence for which seems dubious.

    Do you get our drift? We fail to recall any defeated or incumbent regime whose performance met all public expectations. None!

    So these kinds of analyses are destined to continue failing to make contact with inherent weakness within the policial culture and thus are not net contributions to a higher level of public understanding. On the contrary, they merely act as supports for the merry-go-around with seems acceptable to most.


  14. There are reports that Drumpf has ordered the closure of Venezuelan skies!

    Certainly, another act of an overt war of aggression, if true!

    Nothing less than the mushroom-headed deckemon is becoming more and more obvious.


  15. Yes, it’s true! Don’t know what those having the means are awaiting.

    Martin Niemoller a pastor, like Bushie, has dealt with this matter in relationship to the Third Reich. The fascist regime of Adolf Hitler as fully support by America then. As now, the enduring fountainhead of White supremacy.

    Niemoller wrote, inter alía.

    “First they came for the Communists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not Communist.”

    “Then they came for the Socialists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not Socialist”

    He went on to talk about others who the fascists proceeded to attack – the Unionist, the Jews and Me, using the same poetic structuring.

    The Me was he, Niemoller himself. Having never acted in the defense of others, by the time the current American fascist regime would comes for him, there will no one left to speak in his defense.

    Speaking wid de mushroom!


  16. Peter Wickham indicated that the general election had the potential to go either way and that it was on a knives edge. WTH!

    https://youtu.be/-vZ8j2g7ZGg


  17. “Peter Wickham indicated that the general election had the potential to go either way and that it was on a knives edge.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~
    No comment!!

    No wonder this ‘expert’ is in such high demand by our local political operatives, and by the shiite Press…
    Incompetents of a feather flop together…

    When we analyze the actual RESULTS… it is SO different to the story…

    Education reform
    Water solutions coming
    Breathalyzer tests
    QEH service upgrades
    Garbage pickup
    Electric busses

    Lotta shiite talk from experts… then completely different results.

    What a place!


  18. No Bushie

    Wick-ham use to understand statistical methods once.

    Now his brain is so utterly infested by the political woke-ism ideology that he can no longer see the differences between mode, median and mean.


  19. Inter-dependence Day!


  20. Good Luck to this new party BUT it will be a test to see how Barbadians respond to a party fielding less than 30 candidates.

    Friends of Democracy unveils 12 candidates

    The Friends of Democracy yesterday declared its intention to contest the next general election with purpose and passion, unveiling a 12-member slate of candidates while outlining a platform focused on economic enfranchisement, cost of living issues and national security.

    Party president Karina Goodridge, speaking during a press conference at Sugar Cane Mall in The City, said they were stepping forward at a moment when many Barbadians were grappling with hardship and uncertainty.

    Goodridge, who will contest St Philip West, said the candidates came from “diverse walks of life, each shaped by different experiences”, but were united by a shared desire to serve the country with integrity.

    “These are accountable humans. They stand here not just for self, but for country. They made sure that they took up this mantle to be ambassadors for this nation,” she said.

    The president pointed out that the Friends of Democracy intended to ground its politics in service and moral clarity.

    “We always put God first in this party,” she said, thanking those present for their encouragement.

    Introducing the candidates, she began with her own entry into elective politics.

    “First, myself as the president . . . and I will be standing to contest in the constituency of St Philip West. So, let’s give a round of applause to me,” she said.

    Goodridge said too many Barbadians had been living under strain “because we are faced with the crushing debt and already [high] cost of living, and there’s still the present rate of poverty in this nation. Lives have been reshaped, yes, by uncertainty, and the road ahead will not always be smooth”.

    ‘Honest leadership’ Still, she insisted that Barbadians were capable of solving their own problems.

    “With good governance, honest leadership and a nation standing and supporting together, we will prevail over any challenge. Our problems could be solved by us, and as we unite together, we will make it happen.”

    On economic enfranchisement, which she described as their central mission, she declared that they “refuse to accept today that poverty is supposed to be a life sentence”, adding that the party rejected the idea that “opportunity is the birthright of only a few people in this society”.

    “For too long, power and capital have circulated only within the same circles – those with access to commercial banks, pension funds, shares, dividends, investments and generations of inherited wealth. We want to ensure that these things are available for the mass and not just a few.”

    Goodridge said the party would create “financial institutions and funding platforms that disrupt the status quo”, spread capital to those “long underfunded and underlooked”, and establish interest-free loan programmes that would allow the average Barbadian to compete in commerce, culture, the orange economy, agriculture, tourism, manufacturing and construction.

    On crime and national security, the attorney warned that “a nation cannot prosper when its people feel unsafe”.

    She said the Friends of Democracy was committed to “community-centred strategies, to policies that will help and protect our citizens, to uphold the law and order of this country, and to restore peace to our communities and neighbourhoods”.

    She expressed confidence in the candidates standing beside her, describing them as “the soldiers of this country who will stand on this fight to see a better Barbados, a Barbados that is developed on a high global level.

    “You may say that we sound like dreamers, but we’re not dreaming,” she said. (CLM)

    Source: Nation


  21. Defeat not a sign of regional shift

    By Colville Mounsey colvillemounsey@nationnews.com

    The sweeping 14-1 defeat of Dr Ralph Gonsalves in St Vincent and the Grenadines has triggered intense debate across the Caribbean about whether a broader political shift is emerging, yet, experts warn that drawing parallels with Barbados or other upcoming elections may be dangerously misleading.

    Political scientists Peter Wickham and Devaron Bruce, speaking with the Sunday Sun yesterday, said Dr Godwin Friday’s New Democratic Party’s (NDP) landslide victory – ending Gonsalves’ unprecedented 24-year hold on power – was undeniably a watershed moment. However, they cautioned that the Vincentian outcome is rooted in factors that simply do not exist elsewhere in the region.

    Wickham said the impulse to see the St Vincent result as part of an anti-incumbent “wave” should be treated with scepticism.

    “There’s a feeling on some people’s part that you have a change election in one, there’s a change election in the other. I tend to distinguish elections one from the other,” he said, recalling that Grenada’s sweeping 2013 change of government did not replicate in Barbados days later.

    He argued that the conditions surrounding Gonsalves’ fall – specifically the strength and readiness of the opposition – made St Vincent a poor comparison to Dominica, Antigua or Barbados.

    “St Vincent and the Grenadines had a strong opposition that was led ably and held a large number of seats that made a difference. I can’t see that happening in Dominica if an election were called tomorrow because the opposition is a lot weaker. The same could be said for Antigua, and certainly for Barbados.”

    He also dismissed the idea that Prime Minister Phillip J Pierre’s government in St Lucia faces a similar fate.

    “I think that the result and the outcome in St Lucia will be very different,” he said.

    Bruce was equally firm that Barbados is not poised for a Vincentian-style shift.

    “If people look at St Vincent closely enough, they would see that Ralph was teetering on electoral loss for the last three cycles. He had a one- to threeseat majority. It really only took a small swing for government to change,” he said.

    He stressed that the Democratic Labour Party would require a swing “three times as much” as the NDP achieved to return to Government in Barbados.

    “On that basis, the two are not comparable. Barbados needs a much larger swing. That would be a heavy lift in any instance,” Bruce said.

    He pointed out that Bridgetown and Kingstown will now have to mend what he characterised as “a very negative way to start a relationship”, referring to tensions between the Barbados Labour Party and the incoming Vincentian government linked to alleged campaign involvement by Barbadian operatives.

    “But, it’s one that certainly can be improved and grown,” he added.

    Bruce said the wider region should watch closely to see whether Prime Minister Friday maintains Gonsalves’ staunch positions on sovereignty and hemispheric diplomacy – especially on Venezuela, where Gonsalves had been one of CARICOM’s most influential voices.

    Both analysts said one of the clearest lessons from the Vincentian outcome is the danger of building a political movement entirely around a single personality.

    Bruce described Gonsalves’ long tenure as a cautionary reminder that leadership fatigue eventually reaches even the most loyal voter bases.

    “The longer an individual remains in power, the more complacent and arrogant they become, and that behaviour seeps through onto the electorate in a negative way,” he said, advising that political organisations must prioritise succession planning and renewal.

    He warned against any Caribbean nation allowing itself to reach a point where one party alone appears capable of governing.

    Wickham reiterated that while the St Vincent result will reverberate politically, it does not automatically foreshadow a domino effect.

    “As with all comparative analysis, we have to take into account the peculiar features on the table. The playing fields across the region are uneven and the peculiarities matter,” he said.

    Bruce added: “This is really a wait-and-see circumstance for the region.”

    Source: Nation


  22. Independence process

    Independence is not a day. It is a process. And a precarious one at that. Caribbean society, with its nations that have achieved flag independence, still has a way to go in the independence process.

    That process of maturing in independence has been hampered by colonial and neo-colonial forces, which work to perpetuate dependence.

    But it is also due to our own failing to mature into interdependence. As individuals, nations and as a region, we’ve too often made the mistake of striving for individualist independence rather than interdependent independence.

    Gaining independence is in essence an increased engagement with the realities of being an individual. It is the development of your potential to survive on your own. Independence is a mark of maturity. In earlier historical contexts, independence and maturity were marked by rights of passage, rituals and initiation processes where youth prepared for and were placed in difficult situations, where they had to prove their capacity to cope.

    A boy might be left alone in the wilderness to fend for himself for a period of time, or charged with bringing back proof of a successful hunt. Initiation processes for girls were often less physically demanding, but still required extensive education and preparation. Independence in a well-structured and supportive environment is the end of a process of education and preparation for survival under a specific set of circumstances.

    This link between individuality, independence and maturity can be misleading. It may cause you to think that as individuals, as we mature, and become more independent, have less responsibilities to, or less reliance on others.

    Often, the opposite is the case. The rites of passage for boys and girls in socalled primitive societies, while often developing and affirming the youth as an individual reaching maturity, were also means of making sure they integrated successfully into society and could contribute meaningfully.

    The irony is that greater independence, in a healthy manner, means increased appreciation and capacity for interdependence. Independence in a well-structured and supportive environment is the end process of education and preparation for survival as part of a group. Human beings are a social species. For a human being, being a member of a society is important for surviving and for thriving. The mature and independent individual is better able to contribute to the society which contributes to their survival and thriving.

    A more immature and individualist conception of independence has taken root in contemporary society. The link between independence and interdependence is obscured by the idea that independence means, “I can make it on my own, so I don’t need anyone else.” There are many who have the idea that, “I have made it on my own. I am self-made and owe nothing to anyone,” or, “I have to make it on my own so that I will owe no one anything.”

    Even among those who give credit to a god or gods, we can find the attitude that other human beings are irrelevant or incidental to their success.

    This immature sense of independence is understandable in a poorly structured environment, which does not offer support at levels suitable to the circumstances. When education and preparation is deficient, people will struggle to develop their independence. Whatever levels of independence they reach will be seen as reached in spite of the society and not inspired by the society.

    This person will feel like they have little stake in that society.

    The most dangerous person in any society is the one who feels they have no stake in it. The most dangerous societies are the ones where the people feel that they have no stake. A society that does not properly educate, support and prepare its people for the realities of that society will inevitably be a dangerous society. A society like that will eventually produce a culture of individualism where everyone feels they can stand alone and where the reality is that it is everyone for themselves. This kind of society cannot stand for long. A society that produces this kind of mentality will implode if it does not explode first. I wish you a happy, mature, interdependent, independence process.

    Adrian Green is a communications specialist. Email: Adriangreen14@ gmail.com

    Source: Nation


  23. Feeling happy to see this youthful non dominated attorneys political party. Perhaps we have a coalition. Friends of Democracy (FOD) political party has announced the names of the first 12 candidates who will be contesting the next General Election in Barbados, when it is constitutionally due.

    President Karina Goodridge, who will be in the St Philip West riding, said their candidates – a mix of old and new faces – comprised people from “diverse walks of life, each shaped by different experiences”.

    Among the familiar faces are attorney Ricardo Harrison and Ricky “Laker” Williams, who previously contested seats as members of the Democratic Labour Party. https://nationnews.com/


  24. Well, this Green reminds us of who he was before the regime seemed to have blunted both his independence and even his burgeoning conception of interdependence as this writer wished for earlier today.

    Notwithstanding, there a need to connect Green’s discourse with a number of other forces including the role of technology as destructive to the humanoid and that very interdependence as the highest level of being.

    In such a pursuit one has to raise the thinking and work of a Ted Kacynski as an example of the role which technology plays as it atomizes humans and destroys that very goal of interdependence. A fundamental human right, if you will!

    Of course Kacynski, or the socalled Unibomber, deployed what some have called terrorism as the means to alert us of how technology has been destroying humans.

    Kacynski, one of the most brillant minds ever produced, saw this threat decades ago. Readers may find need to revisit his manifiesto as published as the means of his capture and imprisonment in the Washington Times sometime ago.

    Most times a warner never comes again!


  25. Seeing this ‘independence’ ceremony

    What’s all this bowing about?

    Is that not a relic of Englishness?

  26. Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV Avatar
    Disgusting Lies and Propaganda TV

    David
    November 30, 2025 at 6:47 am

    “Good Luck to this new party BUT it will be a test to see how Barbadians respond to a party fielding less than 30 candidates.”

    Hopefully it would have a presence outside of contesting general elections. None of the “parties” that contested the 2018 and 2022 elections (besides the BLP & DLP) seem not to have a presence. With this track record why should Bajans take “3rd parties” seriously??.
    The immediate goal of the FOD is to see how many votes it gets in the constituencies. and build on that. Then continue to deliver their message. The group is seen as a splinter from the DLP Could it be that they are waiting for the DLP to stabilize to rejoin? Time will tell.


  27. @Disgusting …

    Saw what you did there.


  28. FOD will pull votes from DLP. 30- 0


  29. Hopefully it would have a presence outside of contesting general elections. None of the “parties” that contested the 2018 and 2022 elections (besides the BLP & DLP) seem not to have a presence. With this track record why should Bajans take “3rd parties” seriously??.

    XXXXXXXXXX

    THE TRACK RECORD OF BOTH BLP AND DLP HAVE LANDED BOTH OF THEM AT SOME POINT IN THE HANDS OF THE IMF WHERE ONLY FAILURES AS A COUNTRY GO AS A LAST RESORT.

    NOT TO ALSO FORGET THE EXTRAORDINARY LEVELS OF HIGH TAXES, CORRUPTION/STEALING ALONG WITH CONSTANT BORROWING TO SHORE UP MISSING FINANCES HENCE WHY NO AUDITED FINANCIALS IN MOST GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS.

    THIS IS THE TYPE OF “SUCCESS” MAJORITY BLACK BAJANS HAVE BEEN VOTING FOR SINCE INDEPENDENCE ON THE 2X3 ISLAND.


  30. Well, the Russian Federation has put its forces in Venezuela on high alert. But Russian is a military super power. That means all Russian forces.

    Uh tell wunnah dat uh gine get the mushroom-headed deckemon in wunnah tingamehee.

    Sooner or later!

    That America is as weak as a spider’s web.

    That Drumpf is a loud-mouthed, empty-headed braggart.

    That the RF is at least 20 years ahead of the West in military technologies.

    And if Bissessar had any sense her posture would not have encouraged war on her doorstep.


  31. emperorharriss November 29, 2025 at 1:08 pm #: “One thing the motley Mottley PM need to learn is her place and not to interfere in other countries’ elections. Her behaviour in this matter put her in the scum groupage.”

    emperorharriss

    Could you please VERIFY whether or not several Vincentians allegedly arrived in St. Lucia by boat, and joined the United Workers Party’s (UWP) final political campaign rally, entitled, “Grand Yellow is The Code: Countdown to Victory Rally,” that was held at the La Fargue Playing Field in Choiseul, on Saturday, November 29, 2025?

    Coincidentally, the colour of both the UWP and SVG’s New Democratic Party (NDP), is yellow.

    IF that report is PROVEN TO BE TRUE, and the Vincies are NDP operatives, would you PUBLICLY ADMIT “Friday PM needs to learn his place and not to interfere in other countries’ elections,” and such behaviour in that matter places him “in the scum groupage” as well?

  32. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @Artax
    Yuh reaching……….far?
    Attending a rally? Party kan ovah?
    What did they do Nov 30, find Bajans in Lucia for an Independence Day fete. Or sleep after an extended celebratory session. Or continue wukking for a day, after the many days they toiled in SVG recently.
    🍊🍊 and 🍎🍏?
    You let the emperor under yuh skin.


  33. @ NO

    You’re not only being RIDICULOUS, but it seems a though COMPREHENSION is not your strong suit.

    How is ASKING the ’emperor’ a SIMPLE QUESTION be interpreted as ‘letting the emperor under my skin?

    Let me explain, anytime you see a question mark (?) at the END of a sentence, it means a QUESTION is BEING ASKED……

    …… rather than a DEFINITIVE statement being made.

  34. NorthernObserver Avatar

    Artax

    You are correct, language has never been a strong suit. Including comprehension. Forget punctuation.

    I will let the poster, to whom the question was posed, respond.


  35. Where is the Belgarod?

    That’s what the military chiefs in the Pentagon are losing sleep over.

    The Belgarod is a doomsday submarine which was long monitored through the satélite systems of American military spies in the sky.

    The panic in the Pentagon has led to media narratives which would make Westerners believe that this is no big deal.

    But the Belgarod vanished into the Atlantic and has caused much discomfort in Washington.

    It’s a weapon which has the capacity of creating an explosion on the shores of New York causing not only a tsunami of nuclear destruction of that city but doing so much further afield.


  36. Another landslide victory, this time in St.Lucia. The threat to systems of government we practice in the Caribbean is under threat.


  37. @ David

    RE: “Another landslide victory, this time in St. Lucia.”

    Yes, that’s true, David. The results were a landslide victory, but not for the OPPOSITION United Worker’s Party (UWP), but for the INCUMBENT St. Lucia Labour Party (SLP).

    Herein lies the DIFFERENCE between the general elections of St. Vincent & the Grenadines and St. Lucia.

    Of the 17 seats, SLP won 14, UWP = 1, and, surprisingly, independent candidates = 2. Chastanet, similarly to ‘GONE-salves,’ was able to retain his seat.

    Independent candidate Richard Frederick was declared winner of Castries Central constituency, having gained 2,151 (59.50%) votes of the 3,615 votes casted.

    Obviously, with internal fractures and unresolved public relations issues as a result of Chastanet’s leadership that continues to affect the UWP campaign, and party members defecting to the SLP, Philip J. Pierre was expected to win.

    I’m yet to confirm reports from some of my St. Lucian friends that Nigerians assisted in financing SLP’s campaign.

    RE: “The threat to systems of government we practice in the Caribbean is under threat.”

    David, could you please explain the above comment?

    I watched an Instagram video in which activist David Clarke used the SVG election results as the basis to suggest there is a ‘wind of change blowing across the region,’ perhaps trying to convince himself such a change is imminent in Barbados.

    I’ve also heard about the “code yellow,” which has been successful in SVG, but the overwhelming victory by “red” in SLU, perhaps debunked that theory.


  38. An interesting comment I read in an online article.

    REGIONAL IMPLICATIONS — A NEW POWER BALANCE IN THE OECS

    Pierre’s reelection strengthens the SLP’s influence within the OECS and wider CARICOM, giving St. Lucia a stronger voice on matters such as:

    …… regional security
    …… climate financing
    …… economic recovery frameworks
    …… diplomatic realignments
    …… intra-Caribbean travel and integration

    With heavyweights like Dominica’s Roosevelt Skerrit, SVG’s newly victorious Godwin Friday, and Grenada’s Dickon Mitchell also shaping the region’s political tone, Pierre’s renewed mandate positions him as a stabilizing force in an increasingly complex Caribbean environment.


  39. @Artax

    The comment was to express a concern about the effect of a weak opposition in our inherited system of government. It breeds inefficiency.


  40. @Artax

    Does politics in the sub region of the OEC spill over to the wider Caricom?


  41. Who will be St Lucia’s opposition leader?


  42. Didn’t Chastanet win his seat?


  43. Leader of the opposition is what I meant not opposition leader. According to to the numbers posted by Artax 2 independent candidates also won seats . Would Chastanet need at least one to make him LOO? I would not be politically foolish for one of them to back him . They should both back each other and rotate the LOO office between the two of them


  44. We have to see how the independents align. Last session they voted with the Labour Party.


  45. “Does politics in the sub region of the OEC spill over to the wider Caricom?”

    @ David

    Over the years governments of regional territories signed several CARICOM treaties and initiatives, all of which, in MY opinion, seem to be NON-BINDING AGREEMENTS that are essentially used for political commitments, rather than creating legal rights and obligations.

    The ‘full freedom of movement (FFOM)’ initiative is a recent example. Although CARICOM member states signed on to FFOM, there hasn’t been any real commitment to its implementation, simply because they’re not obligated to do so.

    For example, despite emphasising its support for the full freedom of movement concept, the government of Antigua & Barbuda is yet to be a participant, PREFERRING INSTEAD to actively participate in the free movement agreement for the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS).

    Therefore, based on the above information, my answer is ‘YES’ to your above captioned question.

    However, we could reasonably conclude members of the OECS are more inclined to be committed their Organisation’s policies, than those of CARICOM.


  46. Your view aligns with the blogmaster’s @Artax.


  47. @ David
    @ John 2

    Ironically, both independent candidates, Stephenson King who retained the Castries North constituency, and Richard Frederick, who won Castries Central, were members of the UWP.

    King was PM of St. Lucia from May 1, 2007 to November 30, 2011. He resigned from the UWP, and contested the 2021 general elections as an independent candidate for Castries North.

    A level of animosity exited between Chastanet and independent candidate Richard Frederick, which led to his expulsion from the UWP.

    It’s highly unlikely King and Frederick will join Chastanet, but the possibility exists they could form an alliance for one of them to become Opposition Leader.

    However, based on the fact that both gentlemen did not engage in such an activity after winning their respective seats as independent candidates in the 2021 general elections, Chastanet would most likely be Opposition Leader.


  48. Artax

    I don’t really follow politics closely in the other islands so I had to search. For the previous elections UwP WON 2 seats and had the second most votes . It would have been harder for the independents to remove castanet as LOO.
    Now he is alone the independents can “rob” him of that office and the “riches” that comes with it

    I am assuming the political system is the same as inherited by bim

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading