← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The aim is to stabilise this government, which facilitates the US plunder of the country, by suppressing the opposition of the Haitian people to it.

Reposted from Caribbean Empowerment Blog.


By A.T. Freeman

United States Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin signs a defense pact with his Kenyan counterpart, Aden Duale, Cabinet Secretary for the Ministry of Defence.

Speaking at the 78th session of the United Nations General assembly on 19 September, President Biden called on the UN Security Council to immediately authorise the planned US invasion of Haiti. This demand made by Biden from  the podium of the UN underlines how determined the US is to launch its invasion and demonstrates that the occupation of Haiti and the plundering of its resources, including its rare earth iridium deposits,  are of the utmost importance to the US corporations and the US government which represents them.

From December 1914, when US marines invaded Haiti and literally stole its gold reserves from the national bank, to 2004 when they kidnapped the elected president Jean Bertrand Aristide and 2010 when it once again sent its troops into Haiti in the aftermath of the earthquake, the USA has given Haiti no peace, invading it time and again.

The current planned US/UN invasion is no different. Despite the lying propaganda that the US and its media outlets are spreading that, allegedly, the invasion is intended to benefit the Haitian people by addressing the problem of criminal gangs in that country, its real aims are clear. In reality, the US wants to invade Haiti to shore up the Ariel Henry government that it and its Core Group put in place both of which are completely rejected by the Haitian people.

The aim is to stabilise this government, which facilitates the US plunder of the country, by suppressing the opposition of the Haitian people to it. The so-called security mission, therefore, necessitates the shedding of the Haitian people’s blood to serve the interests of the US corporations. The justification for it, that the Haitian people are ‘helpless children’ who need to be rescued from criminal gangs by a ‘white saviour’ in the form of the US and UN, reveals the deeply racist nature of the whole undertaking.

Given this situation and mindful of the fact that another outright invasion of Haiti would completely expose them, particularly in light of their endless criticism of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the US policy makers have decided that they need Black governments to front the invasion for them. This further demonstrates the deeply racist nature of this project since the sole intention is to use these Black faces for the purpose of deflecting criticism of the racist nature of the invasion.

For nearly a year, US diplomats have searched high and low for a Black government to do its dirty work, applying intense pressure to governments in the African Union [AU] and CARICOM. Eventually, William Ruto, president of Kenya, volunteered his government for the role. The treachery of Ruto is all the more galling as he hails from a country which gave the world Didan Kimathi and his heroic Land and Freedom Army  (called the Mau Mau by the British) that, arms in hand, took on the British colonialists in the struggle to achieve Kenya’s independence. Today, Ruto drags Kenya’s name in the mud by sending that country’s troops to suppress the Haitian people who also had to win their freedom by taking up arms against their European enslavers. There is no doubt that the Kenyan people will hold this traitor to account.

The US delight at Ruto’s decision was immediately obvious. President Biden publicly thanked him from the UN podium. Then the US announced that it would fund the invasion and set aside a budget of US$100 million for this purpose. It also announced that it would train the Kenyan troops and, on 25 September, it despatched its Secretary of Defence, Lloyd Austin, to Nairobi where he signed a bilateral defence co-operation agreement with Kenya. What is not yet in the public domain is what money passed hands in the dark so that Kenyan troops could be sent to Haiti to shed the blood of their brothers and sisters.

However, the treachery did not end with Ruto. On 27 September, local media reported that the Barbados government of Prime Minister Mia Mottley would also take part in the planned US/UN attack on Haiti. Mottley has styled herself as an outspoken critic of the unjust international order and defender of small island developing states, the Caribbean and Africa.  Her government’s decision to take part in this US organised racist attack on Haiti, likely coordinated by the US SouthCom and it’s Barbados based Regional Security System, exposes those claims as a complete fraud.  

There is no justification for the US to launch another racist attack on Haiti and everyone should condemn and oppose it.

No to the US/UN invasion of Haiti!

Hands off Haiti!

Please join the conversation on Caribbean Empowerment’s Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2583126101949661/ Or, you can comment by emailing us at: caribbeanempowerment@pm.me

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

71 responses to “Haiti – Another United States Invasion Scheme”


  1. What foolishness.

    Haití has had, for example, 3000 murders in the last year.

    México has had 36,000.

    American weapons manufacturers are one causal factor in both.

    Certainly, México is closer to the USA than Haití.

    The underlying truth is that America, having been linked with the assasination of the former president, Moisé, and given the
    need to install another puppet president who will then legally ok their real military intervention, even as they are effectively running the country through a socalled Core Group of embassies, this illegal and unprecedented action by the UNSC, sending in police, some of whom, like the Kenyans are currently killing peaceful demonstrators in Kenya, will serve to have an election to make American designs to keep Haití in confusion real.

    International law does not permit UNSC interventionism in circumstances of internal strife on when state actors are involved.

    This deviation reminds us of “humanitarian intervention” under the concocted “right to protect”.

    Have these deviations, like in the case of Lybia not proven the fecklessness of the idiots in Washington as they use the UNSC to reassert dominance?

    No wonder the Chinese and the Russian abstained. How unfortunate! Maybe they see a longer game. Maybe a deal has been made, sacrificing Haitían interests. Maybe, maybe!

    The idiocy that Haití is some “big problem” to solve for some “small island developing states”, as the rock which cowards seek always to hide under, is ignorance imbued with rightness of Whiteness.

    Are there not many small island states which never had such protracted difficulties?

    But instead of going to structural causation, the pragmatic apologists seek to blame the víctim for the centuries crimes committed by others.

    De more wunna do. The sooner the big, mushroom-headed, deckie will be in wunna crotch!

    Regardless of the circumstances, that recessive Bajan mentality, when given quite, never fails to reaasert its degenerate self.


  2. Nations are constructs as are Empires.
    Roman Empire became British Empire which became American Empire with slavery and white supremacy racism thread weaved into their tapestry. People are still coming to realisation of the prejudice and bias which has been an ongoing awakening since the 50s and 60s in the liberation of minds regarding civil rights, human rights, anti-war, world unity movements, music and arts.


  3. Pacha could be right about budavid’s bias towards USA intervention on this matter, where like the Libya war in 2010 UK wanted US involvement to give them credibility in the same way USA wanted UK’s involvement for Iraq and Afghanistan wars in 2001. Budavid’s bias can be proven by the posts he is not letting through.

  4. “Free riders aggravate me” Avatar
    “Free riders aggravate me”

    Obama called UK freeriders, “Free riders aggravate me”, for begging their help to sanction their dubious war in Libya.
    Part of his mission as president, Obama explained, is to spur other countries to take action for themselves, rather than wait for the U.S. to lead. The defense of the liberal international order against jihadist terror, Russian adventurism, and Chinese bullying depends in part, he believes, on the willingness of other nations to share the burden with the U.S. This is why the controversy surrounding the assertion—made by an anonymous administration official to The New Yorker during the Libya crisis of 2011—that his policy consisted of “leading from behind” perturbed him. “We don’t have to always be the ones who are up front,” he told me. “Sometimes we’re going to get what we want precisely because we are sharing in the agenda. The irony is that it was precisely in order to prevent the Europeans and the Arab states from holding our coats while we did all the fighting that we, by design, insisted” that they lead during the mission to remove Muammar Qaddafi from power in Libya. “It was part of the anti–free rider campaign….”

  5. Who Is Gil Scott-Heron? Avatar
    Who Is Gil Scott-Heron?


  6. @rabbit 🐇/🐰
    “I got a feeling that Trump will be the new speaker of the House today or
    tomorrow and President perhaps by Christmas!!”

    I thought such lofty thoughts only happened when the Great Brain had a power surge and you went off the tracks.

    I have never considered that you would be taking mind altering drugs. But your recents pronouncements indicate more than a Great Brain malfunctioning. I guess a rabbit may nibble ‘the wrong’ plant now and then.

  7. Keeping Barbados Underground Caribbean Avatar
    Keeping Barbados Underground Caribbean

    “Some English and Americans like to go to Barbados for a short holiday or vacation”

    “Caribbean?” “No the went on their own accord”


  8. Good morning,
    I would like to inform the RSS, CIA, FBI, GoRoB police (should that be PoRoB) and any other alphabet agency that I was hacked and just managed to regain control of my phone.

    Mention of the RSS or any other agency was done by the hacker and not by me. I will work hand in hand with any agency to unmask the hackers.


  9. Rule 26 (a) of the Republican Conference Rules of the 118th Congress disqualifies Trump.


  10. Artax
    on October 4, 2023 at 4:44 PM said:
    Rate This

    Rule 26 (a) of the Republican Conference Rules of the 118th Congress disqualifies Trump.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Only applies to people not running for President.

    Trump is cool!!!

    Think about it, an indictment or even a conviction does not preclude you from being President.

    Trump could even run the country from jail if he wants!!

    Constitution Trumps party rules!!


  11. Check this breach of the law for which numerous people are being prosecuted after J6. Here is an insurrectionist looking to delay official proceedings, to wit, the vote to keep the Government open.

    Check his explanations and laugh!!


  12. But, isn’t Trump presently campaigning for the 2024 US presidential election? You are on record in this forum as saying he will be a 3 term president. The rule quoted by the experts relates to him being selected as speaker. I prefer to be guided by those indiviuals who have more knowledge of those than you. Over the ALL your opinons on issues relating to Trump have proven to be INCORRECT. Then, after, you would go into hiding until a new ‘Trump controversy’ comes to the fore. As such, your credibility (and sanity) on matters relating to him is highly questionable. I am reminded of you each time I hear the ludicrous, insane responses by the MAGA cult members, to questions posed by the media, and often wonder if you were there somewhere, lurking in the crowd. But, sometimes I believe you are probably attempting to be provocative.


  13. **** that have more knowledge of those issues…..


  14. Okay. Reread the comment and realised, ‘….applies to people not running for president.’ But, nevertheless, I stand by my comments.


  15. The reason is simple. Presidents get treated differently and there are special laws for them and they are a special case in the Constitution.

    Presidential Records Act for example applies only to Presidents, past and present.


  16. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    So, you see how Trump could end up being a 3 term president.

    His second term will be less than 2 years and if Biden and Harris are impeached and he is 2nd in line, he gets the second of his three terms without any elections.

    Until I saw the term limits I reckoned Biden would have been impeached in 2021 with the border. That would have meant though he would only get 2 terms.

    The president and vice president have not obeyed the constitution and are guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors for years. Both could be impeached for the illegal immigration and their lack of action but getting a conviction from the senate is a problem.

    Biden is being investigated for bribery and treason as well.

    Trump as speaker gives Trump the power of subpoena and the management of the House, and he is damn good at management and leadership. He will drive the Republican members of the House like they have never been driven.

    He just needs the year before elections to clean out the rotten election system and make sure he faces free and fair elections in 2024..

    One by one Democrats are realising that unrestricted illegal immigration is a bad idea. The Senate might very well convict Biden and Harris as it will not only curb the illegal immigration but also will allow the Democrats to ditch these two losers and run more sensible candidates.

    The election of the Speaker is going to be real interesting.

    My gut says both Harris and Biden will be impeached by the Republican House and convicted by the Democrats in the senate. The Republicans will then control the House and the Executive, for less than one year before elections in 2024.


  17. Open season on Biden.

    Dems want him gone too!!


  18. Another view on the rule that might preclude Trump’s election as Speaker.

    He says he is willing to step in but it may boil down to the time he can give to the job.

    Once he can get 218 votes he will be speaker and the Republicans have 221 seats so it is definitely possible.


  19. Kenya’s troops are due to arrive by the end of the week in Haiti.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/21/kenya-haiti-mission


  20. America wants the path of democracy to be restored in order for development aid to flow into Haiti.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/21/americas/kenya-haiti-delegation-intl-latam/

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading