In recent weeks the world is being reminded how military tension in faraway countries can effect us at our front doors. We have become a global village with economies that are interdependent. Some countries blessed with natural resources will negotiate the economic tempest without catastrophic fallout, others will be exposed as not very resilient.
How quickly we have forgotten the role international credit rating agencies played in the 2008 financial crisis. Analysts agree that mortgage-backed securities were given safe investment grade rating – the objective: to encourage highest profit making. The rest as they say is history with some countries like Barbados with opened economies unable to recover to pre-2008 economic performance.
The experience of the 2008 financial crisis emphasizes the importance of oversight bodies implementing robust, relevant governance infrastructure to minimize recurrence of seismic events of 2008. In Barbados we witnessed a local version of poor governance with corruption added to the mix which led to the collapse of CLICO. Many Barbadians have suffered immeasurably as a result, some crossing to the great beyond after losing lifelong investments and nest egg savings.
PwC Canada has been fined more than $900,000 by Canadian and US accounting regulators over exam cheating involving 1,100 of its auditors.
The watchdogs found that the Big Four firm failed to spot that staff were sharing answers in professional exams between 2016 and 2020 because of shortcomings in its internal standards and test supervision.
The Canadian Public Accountability Board fined PwC Canada C$200,000 while the US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board imposed a $750,000 penalty. The PCAOB, overseen by the Securities and Exchange Commission, has powers to sanction foreign accounting firms if they are licensed to carry out work for US clients.
FBN
This week another international PwC fined over exam cheating involving 1,100 of its auditorsnada Fined by US for ‘Widespread’ Cheating on Training story caught the eye. PwC Canada has agreed to pay $750,000 to US audit regulator after it was discovered over 1200 of PwC professionals shared or received answers to internal training tests. It makes the average person question the trust given to certifications and attestations issued by financial accounting houses who are responsible for shoring your confidence in the financial space.
PwC employees fined by US regulator represent the culture of that organization. The blogmaster will confidently opine PwC was caught in the dragnet this time around but the unethical behaviour probably exist elsewhere. One can only speculate the extent audit comments and management letters are compromised because of actors with questionable ethnics who represent oversight bodies such as the PwCs and others.
In Barbados we tend to avoid probing these kinds of issues as the CLICO episode exposed. Regulators being fined routinely has become a regular anyway. Not one day so far.
Peanuts.
The tip of the iceberg.
Less than a peanut.
Probably less than the annual salary of some higher-ups
Boy, am I surprised! NOT!
😀
I seem to be going through a slow period.
My comment was more a knock on the small penalty imposed by the US and Canada. Such small fines may seem like punishment but are not harsh enough to curb wrongdoing.
Has anyone else noted that NATION NEWS is still in FULL SLAVERY MODE. They keep quoting this and that lawyers as “QC”, do they know Barbados is now a REPUBLIC and these legal titles are now non existent for the legal fraternity. Same as Royal this and that are now not legal names.
Highly educated does have it’s limits particularly those administered by the UWI chancellor.
Most fines on the rich are a slap on the wrist. Killer fines are for the poor smoking a spliff to forget their poverty.
Killer fines can be a couple of hundred dollars for the poor.
Learn from Shaggy.
@ Wily Coyote February 26, 2022 10:23 AM
(Unquote).
Has anyone else noted that NATION NEWS is still in FULL SLAVERY MODE. They keep quoting this and that lawyers as “QC”, do they know Barbados is now a REPUBLIC and these legal titles are now non existent for the legal fraternity. Same as Royal this and that are now not legal names.
Highly educated does have it’s limits particularly those administered by the UWI chancellor.
(Unquote).
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Glad you have noticed, WC!
These people just can’t help aping their masters, either past or ‘still’ present.
Even the president refuses to set the right example along with the PM still wallowing in the title “QC”.
Just a bunch of immature mimics still growing up stupid under the Union Jack.
What a bunch of ‘Quack’ counsellors, indeed!
At least Garth Patterson has seen the obviously wise need to drop that monarchical title QC and simply uses SC (Senior Counsel) to set the example of what is means to reflect the mores of a republic.
Even our own GP 2, the regally right royalist, would not have been that daft to carry on the stupid royal pomp and pageantry enough to make the very Queen cry a dry river of mock tears while advising her grandson Prince Willie to stay clear of Bimshire.
@Wily C
Some people are addressed as “The most Honourable” and some are just plain “Honourable”
Source: Nation
@Sargeant
“Some people are addressed as “The most Honourable” and some are just plain “Honourable”
The issue I have is the “Honourable & Most Honourable” list is EXTREMELY LIMITED, what do we call the majority of the legal community “DIS-HONORABLE or better still THIEVES”
Oh yes these individuals still under BLACK SUPREME LEADER SLAVERY and reluctant to give up their mastery “QC” titles, ha, ha., the world laughs at the ignorance.,
I think ALL such titles are pure “pompousity” and therefore quite hilarious. Honourable people really don’t need to be declared honourable every time somebody tries to call their names. If they are IN FACT honourable, it will obvious to most without any such declaration.
Old oeople need to let go of such vanity. Nobody much is falling for that piffle these days.
Why does anybody need to be known by anything other than their name?
Let your honourable deeds speak for themselves, is what I say! They are the only convincing evidence anyway.
@Donna
It is worth the time to acknowledge the origin of the custom of using titles in our system.
————————————————————
The Honourable | Title, Use, & Meaning
https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Honourable
Make that “POMPOSITY”.
Trust blindly for they are experts many say.
Swiss Banks caught up in Money Laundering Scam, recent international headline screams.
FDA and CDC not realising pertinent Covid19 dating according to DemocracyNow and other watchdog organizations.
Poor rakey negotiators in Barbados allow the sale of Cable & Wireless and phone servjce now crappy and new owners scuttle UPS devices for homeowners.
Banks can do as they like.
Procurement used to fund kickbacks.
Proxy companies used to hide kickbacks.
Feed me shit and tell me eat it and be a good citizen and you will I will ger largasse crumbs and be included in social invites with de boys… while others smell shite.
Again, trust de experts blindly!
David,
Lotta shite that needs flushing!
Makes people look silly, clinging to these damn titles!
We can award people and reward people without these damn titles!
To let @herman jemmott know, the challenges cited are universal. Any why so many start ups fail. Many failures lack mentors. Or refuse mentorship (they know better?). And yes many want to ‘show success’ before they are actually successful.
If one observes the many ‘immigrant’ populations in other countries, one will note that skin tone is not a binder. Koreans may ‘look like’ Chinese (even Japanese) but they are very separate for the most part.
Their support comes from within their community.
Reblogged this on Solutions – Solutii.