grenville-phillips
Submitted by Grenville Phillips II,

As a small independent country, there are a few maxims that should guide our behaviour.  Never blast a hole in our boat, because it can sink, and we will all suffer.  Never contaminate the food on our boat, because we will all get sick.  Never sabotage any part of our boat, because it will hinder our progress.

The only justifiable reason for damaging the boat, is for enslaved people to protest their condition.  However, we are no longer slaves.  Our slave fore-parents purchased this land for us with their blood.

We elect persons to navigate our boat for up to 5 years.  We may severely criticise their performance.  However, there is no good reason for any Barbadian today to damage our boat.  This should be common sense.  However, there are a few Barbadians who think that they have a licence to harm our boat.

Participating in corruption, bribery, and drug-gang alliances, is to blast a hole in our boat.  Infiltrating and then politicising professional, industry, news media, and union organisations is to contaminate our water supply.  Discouraging responsible foreign investment, is to sabotage our boat.

Opposition politics in Barbados is about convincing people how bad things are, so that they will vote against the party in government.  To do this, each party relies on their political operatives.  These operatives know of only one method of maintaining discontent, that is to harm our boat.

Political operatives have adopted this slave legacy of sabotage, as part of their opposition to the party in Government.  They have a real incentive.  They are normally well-rewarded by their political party.  Therefore, they focus on getting their party elected by any means, regardless of the cost to us.

Since either the BLP or DLP is opposing the party in Government, opposition political operatives are always trying to harm Barbados.  However, this continuous harming of Barbados must stop – for all our sakes.  Since the DLP is currently out of Government, it is up to them to stop this cycle.

The DLP’s political operatives will naturally feel that they are being unfaired.  They saw that the BLP’s worst political operatives, who did major damage to the boat when they were in opposition, were richly rewarded.  They think that now is the time for them to earn their reward.

Despite how badly the BLP’s political operatives behaved when the BLP was in opposition, someone needs to decide to be the adult.  Otherwise, this toxic tit-for-tat political environment that both parties have cultivated, will never end.

If we want to preserve this country for our children, we must find a way of competing politically that does not include damaging our boat.  Perhaps all political parties can consider the following initiatives.

  1. Each party should explain how they plan to stop their candidates from accepting bribes.  The public can then decide whether their methods are effective.
  2. Professional organisations can analyse and compare each party’s social development and economic growth plans.
  3. Industry organisations can assess and compare each party’s barriers to investment.
  4. The media can provide fair, honest, and non-partisan political coverage.
  5. The unions can stop promoting and protecting one party, and frustrating and not-cooperating with the other.

After 50 years of independence, we should be mature enough to try a better path.  However, it is unlikely that political operatives will behave properly, because the rewards are just too enticing.  Since they harm our boat on behalf of their party, only their party can order them to stop.

It is foreseen that if both parties do not restrain their political operatives, then Barbados will become ungovernable.  However, simply ordering their political operatives to cease and desist will not be enough.  The DLP’s political operatives will justifiably claim that they alone are asked to bear the burden.

To ensure full participation by all political operatives, they must all be convinced that they will never again be rewarded for harming Barbados.  For this to happen, then BLP must terminate the reward-appointments of their worst political operatives – otherwise, we are all sunk.

Grenville Phillips II is a Chartered Structural Engineer and President of Solutions Barbados.  He can be reached at NextParty246@gmail.com

218 responses to “We Are All Sunk”


  1. To ensure full participation by all political operatives, they must all be convinced that they will never again be rewarded for harming Barbados.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++

    The fatted calf is no more!!!

    The bribe money comes from overseas.

    What we need is whistle blowers who will get the information regarding money laundering and bribes overseas.

    Donville is not enough!!

  2. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    To date, both parties have simply lied when promising to end corruption. I have no confidence in the Bajan public to not fall into this trap over and over again.
    I have no confidence in the professional organizations to adequately analyze and critique social and economic plans. This is because these bourgeois clubs have no representation from poor people and so will continue to promote plans that ignore the needs of most Bajans.
    The Indus organizations are even worse than the professional ones. They will do nothing except try to get fat off the public purse as they have done for as long as I have been alive.
    Neither You nor I should wade into this morass without disclosing potential conflicts of interest.
    This I agree with completely.

  3. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    The above paragraphs should be labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 but the blog software stripped the numbers.


  4. It is the voters of Barbados who should police the political system. As long as voters reward the
    misconduct if party operatives, the bad behaviour will continue.

    That is why the family, the school and the church are such important institutions in society. It is up to these institutions to somehow create citizen voters who have the integrity to reject the poisonous politics of slander and vote-buying.

    If politicians know they can be successful only if they present positive ideas in political campaigns, instead of just attacking their opponents, or buying votes, they will create a healthy political system.


  5. Agree with you Peter, it is time for one of the major parties to show us the corruption. The game is up. They talk pretty on the campaign trail and when it is over they all laugh over bigmout drinks on the back patios.

  6. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @Ewart
    The family, the school and especially the church have been in charge of “creating citizen voters who have integrity” for all of our history so far, including the era os enslavement. I need hardly point out that they have done an horribly bad job. It is obvious that if we continue to do the same things that we have in the past we will have equally horrible outcomes in the future.

    What do you specifically propose that we change in order to achieve “citizen voters who have integrity?”


  7. PLT

    The way capitalism works, it does not matter much if most people are selfish, or if special interests pursue narrow objectives.

  8. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @Ewart
    Capitalism does not work without radical economic redistributive mechanisms added on. Capitalism by itself inevitably produces a very small super rich oligarchy. This is not opinion, it is mathematically proven.

    So what that means in practice is that it matters more than just about anything else that most people are selfish.


  9. Given the high rates of illegitimacy in Barbados, it is hardly fair to say the family has done a poor job of inculcating the right set of values in children. In the colonial period, middle class families worked well to protect “middle class” values, but poverty constrained the size of the middle class.

    Schools have also de-emphasised the thankless work of character-building, and churches today encourage permissiveness and moral laxity. Sin is tolerated.


  10. @Mr. Phillips… IMO, a poignant and sincere piece of language and message.

    Your metaphor is right on the money. We’re all in this boat together — this island, as well as this planet.

    Disagreement is healthy, so long as it is honest and productive. Disagreement is where advancement happens.

    For anyone interested in a bit of inspiration, SpaceX is about to launch a satellite. Anyone with a high-speed internet connection (of which a very large percentage of Bajans have access to) can watch at https://www.spacex.com/webcast

    IMHO, there would be more “upside” if we all looked towards the future with hope, while never forgetting history.

    We live in amazing times.


  11. Capitalism has produced affluence for most North Americans and Europeans. It is creating prosperity for most Asians.

    But you are envious of the super-rich, when you should be ignoring them.

    In the Caribbean, most people in both Trinidad and (soon) Guyana have achieved a reasonable level of material comfort. Barbados was on its way but incompetent leaders let us down. Antigua and St. Lucia are nearly on par with Barbados.

    You are too impatient. Radical redistribution destroys the dynamism of capitalist wealth-creating institutions.


  12. All roads lead to de boss lady


  13. In the colonial period, middle class families worked well to protect “middle class” values, but poverty constrained the size of the middle class.

    Where did you grow up? There was no real middle class during the colonial period, practically everyone was poor
    What are middle class values?
    Are you saying the poor did not practice these middle class values?

  14. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @Ewart
    Actually I’m lucky enough to be rich, but I don’t let that distract me from reading and understanding current economic research.

    Here is a recent article explaining current research in laymen’s terms:
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-inequality-inevitable/


  15. PLT

    Inequality is a fashionable subject in the academic literature. Like climate science, it is the subject of alarmist claims. I have spent half of my adult life studying and teaching in universities and I can tell you that the academy is dominated by attention-seeking careerists who are constantly making outlandish claims on the basis of flimsy evidence.

    Compare the Caribbean 75 years ago to the Caribbean today. The improvement in the general standard of living is astonishing. That is the evidence that capitalism is transforming the region.

  16. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @Ewart
    You will have no trouble digesting the article and following up with the underlying research it references.

    It it not the usual flash in the pan theorizing, but a fundamental and seminal body of work that has been being built since the 80s. It’s worth your attention.


  17. @EA: “…and I can tell you that the academy is dominated by attention-seeking careerists who are constantly making outlandish claims on the basis of flimsy evidence.

    You mean the empirical evidence that the CO2 being injected into the atmosphere is having a major impact on the amount of energy being captured from the Sun by the thermal-dynamic system some call Earth?

    This is, of course, a very complex problem space. Lots of really stupid decisions are being made because of historical momentum.

    The oceans are going to rise several meters over the next few decades. Nothing we can do to stop that now.

    What we Bajans can do, though, is start planning for this. Do we build seawalls, or do we move Bridgetown, Holetown, et al?

    P.S. SpaceX’s launch went nominally. They successfully landed the first stage of the rocket on a “drone ship” out in the Atlantic.


  18. PLT

    I know the economics literature like the back of my hand.

  19. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @Ewart
    Great, then Chakraborti’s analysis will be that much more fascinating.


  20. Chris Halsell

    I do not want to get into an argument with you about environmental extremism.

    Suffice it to say that there is plenty of research underway to perfect new technologies that will suck carbon dioxide directly out of the atmosphere at an affordable cost.

    I’m planning to spend my retirement near the beach. You can worry about rising sea levels if you so choose. I am not losing any sleep about that


  21. @EA: “I do not want to get into an argument with you about environmental extremism.

    Of course not. Because like most distractionary trolls, you wouldn’t be able to keep up.

    I am well aware of the contemporary literature on technology advancements in this area.

    The general consensus is even if CO2 emissions stopped today, we’re still going to see a lot of sea-level rise.

    CO2 emissions aren’t going to stop today.

    Thus, we must start planning for this. Fortunately, we have (some) time.

    Unfortunately, it’s going to cost serious coin. Who’s going to pay for that?


  22. @Ewart Archer
    Capitalism has produced affluence for most North Americans and Europeans. It is creating prosperity for most Asians.

    #######################################################################################

    How exactly did capitalism create prosperity for North Americans and Europeans? By enslaving and robbing blind the rest of the human race. It might be more accurate to say that slavery and colonialism produced affluence in North America and Europe but even that is not available to all the people living in those countries. Most working people there live a modest lifestyle, one pay check away from poverty. The middle strata have a more comfortable life but these are a minority of the society. It’s really the rich and the super rich who live an affluent life. It’s one thing to defend the capitalist system but there’s no need to spread disinformation abut how it works and what its results are. BTW, the country with the highest economic growth rates and which is lifting the largest number of people out of poverty is China, which is ruled by the communist party.


  23. (Quote):
    Suffice it to say that there is plenty of research underway to perfect new technologies that will suck carbon dioxide directly out of the atmosphere at an affordable cost. (Unquote).
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    No doubt such futuristic technologies to save the species from self-destruction are indeed on the horizon.

    The question remains: Where would that carbon dioxide to be sucked out of the atmosphere end up?

    Would it be returned to its recent place of confinement which Mother Nature took hundreds of thousands of years to conceal from the sun but modern man less than 500 to dig up?

    You don’t have to be an Einstein to know that:
    “Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be changed from one form to another.”


  24. @Ewart Archer
    Compare the Caribbean 75 years ago to the Caribbean today. The improvement in the general standard of living is astonishing. That is the evidence that capitalism is transforming the region.
    ####################################################################################################

    This is really a complete misunderstanding of the history of the Caribbean. As you know, capitalism has been in the Caribbean from the time the European colonialist arrived here, committed genocide against the indigenous people and enslaved the Africans, thereby violently incorporating the region into the globalised capitalist economy. You may well ask yourself why, if your theory is correct, this improvement in the standard of living of the Caribbean people is only evident in the last 75 years and not since 1492? The fact is that these improvements were gained as a result of the restraints that the working class struggles eg the uprisings of the 1930s, the emergence of trade unions and political parties based in the majority communities placed on the operation of capitalism in the Caribbean. So the improvements in our people’s standard of living is a result of the restriction of capitalism rather than its operation. The challenge today is that with the rise of neo-liberal globalisation, the capitalists are demanding the lifting of these restrictions and wherever you look in the world, this is leading to increasing poverty amongst working people and is placing growing stress on the small societies which make up the Caribbean.


  25. “I have spent half of my adult life studying and teaching in universities and I can tell you that the academy is dominated by attention-seeking careerists who are constantly making outlandish claims on the basis of flimsy evidence”

    takes one to know one huh


  26. @Tee White: “The challenge today is that with the rise of neo-liberal globalisation, the capitalists are demanding the lifting of these restrictions and wherever you look in the world, this is leading to increasing poverty amongst working people…

    I generally agree with your statement. This is a serious issue.

    Just as one example, Amazon deliver amazingly inexpensive “bits” and “atoms” to its customers. But their workers (reportedly) often suffer incredibly difficult working conditions for sustenance pay. And then there are the workers who produce all the stuff being purchased — many living on only $3 USD a day (if they are lucky).

    While I agree things are a bit tricky at the moment, I don’t buy into hysteria — it clouds rational thinking. Don’t fear just because things are changing. Change is the new nominal.

    It is important to note that employers and employees (and their customers) are in a symbiotic relationship. It’s unhealthy if this relationship ever becomes adversarial.


  27. Tee White

    It is NONSENSE to say that the United States or Canada became rich from slavery The industries that made Americans rich, for example, were energy industries (principally oil and gas) that allowed most work to be performed efficiently by machines; automobile manufacturing: computers and information technology, etc. To put it crudely, these industries were based on the white man’s ingenuity, not on the exploitation of slaves. The American South is the poorest region of the United States.

    Even in Europe, Germany, Switzerland and Scandinavia did not rely on overseas empires. Spain and Portugal had large empires but were among the poorest European countries until very recently. Most economic historians do not accept the argument that the industrial revolution in Great Britain and France was financed primarily ir even significantly by the profits from space-based enterprises.

    Your argument is ridiculous.

    As for the claim that most Americans live paycheque to paycheque, it is quite misleading. The typical young American buys a house with a hefty mortgage. He builds up equity over time in this house. He also pays into the Social Security system every month. Towards the end of his life, he is entitled to a lifetime pension and has several hundreds of thousands of dollars of home equity. That is the definition of affluence.


  28. slave-based enterprises

  29. fortyacresandamule Avatar
    fortyacresandamule

    Inequality is not fashionable notion . It is a reality of capitalism. It becomes more alarming today because of the vast wealth gap. The top 10 billionaires today have more wealth half of humanity. If anyone don’t find that unsettling, then they need to check themselves.


  30. “To put it crudely, these industries were based on the white man’s ingenuity, not on the exploitation of slaves. ”

    you are LYING.

    half truths and LIES are your MO..


  31. “As for the claim that most Americans live paycheque to paycheque, it is quite misleading.”

    another…BIG LIE..

    most people are one or 2 paychecks away from homelessness, welfare, foodstamps..

    yall like to lie and spread false information around too much.

    This is TRUTH…this is REALITY..

    https://www.facebook.com/duncan.karani/videos/2606664819349797/?t=0


  32. fortyacresandamule

    Do you understand that if Bill Gates has billions of dollars, it does not mean that he is hoarding a pile of cash that he is keeping from the rest of us.

    Where is Bill Gates and his billions? What does his wealth consist of? How does this wealth, even if it legally belongs to “Bill Gates” benefit society?


  33. The biggest problem Caribben people face are their CORRUPT, TIEFING LEADERS….who LIVE TO SELL THEM OUT…

    the stress the econly feels ARE FROM THE local THIEVES…more so than external stresses…

    look what they did in Barbados, how much they STOLE over decades and still are, both wicked governments just steal tax dollars, VAT dollars, pension money, estates, money BORROWED in the people names and divvy it up, they set up scams to rip off bllions and billions of dollars and share it with whomever helps them rob the people…

    Were the leaders not such thieves, the situation would be a whole lot better..

    so your leaders are the REAL problem.


  34. Maybe the boat like Noah Ark would end up on top of some mountain where archaeologist would one day figure out who were the jac.a ss that flooded barbados with debt


  35. @WURA-WAR-on-U: “The biggest problem Caribben people face are their CORRUPT, TIEFING LEADERS….who LIVE TO SELL THEM OUT…

    Wow. That’s some serious energy.

    I don’t understand it. But it’s not my place to.


  36. @Chris

    One gets use to the noise. Our best people cower in the background and refuse to offer themselves for public service. If this is the case we have to live with what we get. It is as simple as that.


  37. “I don’t understand it. But it’s not my place to.”

    It’s not your place if you don’t pay taxes on the island, if you don’t pay VAT which everyone has to on everything, if you don’t contribute to your pension….then you really don’t have to care….but the majority population who pay for everything and have for decades, now have no choice but to make it their business, since they have lost billioins because of all those thieves, the pretend leaders, over the decades.


  38. @Ewart Archer
    Facts are very stubborn things and writing in capital letters doesn’t change them. I’m sure you understand that those who created both the United States and Canada were Europeans. You may want to ask yourself, how it is that the said Europeans came to be in possession of land in both of these countries. You may call it the ‘white man’s ingenuity’ but most people know it as violent and genocidal colonial land theft.

    It flies in the face of all the historical evidence to claim that North America and Europe weren’t made rich by slavery and colonialism. Let us take a look at what came to be referred to as King Cotton in the USA. There would have been no textile industry in the USA without the growing of the said cotton by slaves. But this is not all. Because upon this base of the slave produced cotton, sits not only the development of the textile industry but also those industries which emerged to furnish the textile industry with machinery and ancillary services such as banking and insurance since these are needed for these capitalist enterprises to thrive. This is why countries such as Switzerland which may not have directly had slaves are also involved because they carry out banking functions for the slaving countries. Anyone familiar with the birth and development of the modern globalised capitalist economy fully understand the role that genocide and land theft against the indigenous people and enslavement of Africans played as its foundations. Do you really believe that powerful European and American governments waged wars against each other and were engaged in colonial land theft and enslavement of Africans for over 400 years because they gained no economic benefits from these activities?

    As to the fact that there are ‘learned professors’ who spend their whole lives trying to refute these facts, you’ve already provided a description of these people, “the academy is dominated by attention-seeking careerists who are constantly making outlandish claims on the basis of flimsy evidence”.


  39. @David: “Our best people cower in the background and refuse to offer themselves for public service.

    Respectfully, I refuse to believe that.

    It’s fun being challenged!

    It’s what sports, and science, is all about…

  40. SirSimple SimonPresidentForLife Avatar
    SirSimple SimonPresidentForLife

    @Ewart Archer December 16, 2019 8:14 PM “…the academy is dominated by attention-seeking careerists who are constantly making outlandish claims on the basis of flimsy evidence.”

    Sounds as though you are describing yourself.


  41. I warned you but you did not listen,now look and enjoy

  42. SirSimple SimonPresidentForLife Avatar
    SirSimple SimonPresidentForLife

    @Ewart Archer December 16, 2019 8:42 PM “Suffice it to say that there is plenty of research underway to perfect new technologies that will suck carbon dioxide directly out of the atmosphere at an affordable cost.”

    You will be dead and buried long before these perfect new affordable technologies are ready.

  43. fortyacresandamule Avatar
    fortyacresandamule

    @Ewart. Bill gates wealth, like many billionaires, are mostly paper wealth created through the stock market. And some of those same multinationals engaged in all type of tax-dodgin gimmicks…eventually depriving the state of vital revenue. I am okay financially, however, it doesn’t me I am blind to the distorted system that uncontrolled greedy capitalism has created. I am a student of history and the French revolution is a cautionary tale.


  44. Tee White

    Unfortunately, most black people can’t cope with the fact that we are irrelevant to most of the story of human progress.

    We don’t want to be ignored, so we make up fanciful narratives about (imaginary) contributions to white civilization.

    I understand your psychological need to put slavery at the centre of global economic history, but it would be better if you faced the truth.


  45. @Tee White December 16, 2019 11:14 PM

    @Ewart Archer
    Facts are very stubborn things and writing in capital letters doesn’t change them.

    I believe you are fighting a losing battle, since Ewart is not prepared to be confused with the facts you are presenting – lol.


  46. @Chris

    Be as positive as you want in the outcomes, the quality of the outcomes will be possible based on the quality and integrity of the people who serve. Are we there yet?


  47. @EA: “Unfortunately, most black people can’t cope with the fact that we are irrelevant to most of the story of human progress.

    Could we /please/ get past this?

    It is well documented that “Homo sapiens” (Latin: “wise man”) first evolved in what is now known as Africa.

    Some traveled north, and because of the lack of sunlight, within ~100 generations removed most of the pigment from their skin in order to generate more vitamin D. (Not to mention they shivered their butts off.)

    WE’RE ALL “wise man”!

    Some get trapped in the “rabbit holes” of restitution. I don’t argue that it should be talked about, but it shouldn’t prevent other discussions.

    There are more than a few important matters to think about and manage right now.

    Like, existential.


  48. Dear All:

    I am not optimistic that the well-rewarded political operatives can be controlled (they know too much), or that their political masters want to restrain them; hence, the pessimistic title.


  49. @nextparty246: “…hence, the pessimistic title.

    There’s no upside in being pessimistic.

    It doesn’t work, anyway… 🙂


  50. CH

    Your comment is a non sequitur.

    To use your terms of reference, I am saying that the humans who remained in Africa are largely irrelevant to the story of human progress, which was created mainly by the humans who walked out of Africa and continued their evolution in other regions of the world.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading