← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Pachamama

It should be pellucid by now that barring a tectonic disclosure or other intervention Hillary Rodham Clinton (HRC) will win the USA presidential elections. However, she will immediately come under a massive series of investigations aimed at giving the defeated Republicans, provided they can retain the House of Representatives, a raison detre. Her presidency will provide the conditions for the RNC not to lose its status as a national party, as the legacy of Trumpism has placed it in grave danger so to.

In this piece we will rely, heavily, on the works of Charles Ortel. Ortel is best known for his analytical work, as a citizen, which brought down General Electric (GE) for doctoring financial results; Dadi Cheri a Haitian journalist of newsjunki.org and Utrice Lead, a Trinidadian-American from the Progressive Radio Network (PRN).

For over 20 years a basket of public foundations run by Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and Chelsea Clinton have served as entities for the illegal raising, laundering, commingling and mishandling of over 100 billion dollars. Much of this money coming from dictators and other characters presumably in exchange for favours, quid pro quo, pay to play schemes. The majority from average citizens around the world.

Readers unaware should know that there are very strict rules governing the operations of public charities in the world, even if there is an absence of formal global regulation. Public foundations are required by law to appoint independent trustees; cross-file financial statements with multiple jurisdictions; must be registered variously, should they want to operate in dozens of countries or states like the Clintons; money raised from the public must be deployed specifically for the reason stated. And the foundation’s public filings must so show, amongst others.

These laws are some of the strictest in the world. The legal infrastructure is excessively onerous in order to avoid oodles of tax free money going into the hands of disreputable actors. Money collected from unsuspecting publics, serving as a honey pot for the world’s leading charity fraud criminals.

In the case of the Clinton Foundation/s, an entity purportedly started to build and run a presidential library it has now morphed into a massive trans-national organization, operating tax free internationally and as the source of billions of dollars which we will contend has been an incubator for ‘high crimes and misdemeanour’ by HRC.

In addition to the spider web of entities controlled by the Clintons there is a wider level of intrigue. The Clintons have a cartel of alliances with other private/public foundations; drug companies manufacturing and selling vaccines and pharmaceutical of poor quality, the Red Cross, the UN which appointed Bill Clinton as ambassador to Haiti thereby immunizing him from prosecution there; access to governments around the world with a Clinton State Department as hammer, Bill as anvil, to force deals through for their personal interests.

This scheme is trans-presidential. The Bushes aided and abetted the Clintons and now the Obamas are waiting in the wing to cash in on the action. If it determined that both parties are too compromised all bets are off. No investigations in the House of Representatives. No trial of HRC in the Senate.

The preliminary procedures are already in the system. Marsha Blackburn, the representative from the 7th congressional district of Tennessee in the House of Representatives has already started a probe. Eric Schneidermann, the AG of New York, a Clinton acolyte, has already brought a case in which a Clinton Foundation founding personage and Virginia governor, Terry McAuliffe, has been made to appear.

After the 2010 Haiti earthquake the international community, ordinary people like us, donated 14.3 billion for reconstruction. With the help of the UN, the Clinton Foundation was given total control of these monies. Six years later only 2% of the money has been made available to the Haitian people and government. There are fears that this foundation money is being used in HRC’s presidential campaign.

In Haiti the Clintons are known to have more power that the government and while there are many rumours about where the reconstruction money is, or went, little has changed on the ground, unbelievable!

This is the kind of insidious relationships the Clintons have long had with Haiti. It was Bill Clinton who ran Aristide out of Haiti in the early 1990’s.

This same Bill Clinton forced the Haitian people to stop planting rice and forced them to import it from Arkansas, a state for which he is a former governor. The brother of HRC was able to secure rights to all of Haiti’s gold resources. Nothing could happen in Haiti unless the Clintons agreed.

This is how it has been even before there was a Black man in the White House. Obama, himself, aided the Clintons with massive capital accumulation. These are people who in 2000 were broke and now there are said to have personal wealth in the hundreds of millions while controlling billions in Clinton Foundations funds. The election of HCA could serve to further consolidate this position and offer a degree of immunization for all previous crimes, they hope.

Unless, somebody has cause to walk into the White House and say ‘Madam President there is a cancer on the Presidency”. The Clintons are betting that these crimes can be gotten away with, we doubt. They aim is to enrich themselves under the protection of law and hand billion to a single child, Chelsea Clinton and her heirs.

In the publicly available information on the Clinton Foundations we see highly questionable transfers between and amongst entities. The Clinton Foundations making transfers between themselves and other private foundations making transfers to the Clintons and vice versa. These to us, appear to be attempts at misleading the IRS and creating opportunities for diversion. They seem to be false transactions bordering on the extremes of illegality.

We are uncertain whether the American imperium is able to digest another impeachment. Absent that determination, we judge that there is an abundance of evidence, not proof, that serious breaches of charity law, exceeding the level for which Bill Clinton and Richard ‘Dick’ Nixon were impeached. In these circumstances, many people will be going to jail as Trump suggests but we hardly think Hillary Rodham Clinton will be on that list.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

719 responses to “HRC Will Win – But Has to Fight to Avoid Impeachment”


  1. Why Comey Did It…

    Predictably, Comey’s move made Clinton and her comrades in arms in the mainstream media go nuts.
    They had called Comey, who was nominated by President Obama, a paragon of integrity and virtue when he let Clinton off the hook just a few months ago.
    But now he was instantly relabeled a partisan hack trying to singlehandedly decide the election in Trump’s favor.
    What the mainstream media has purposefully missed in their attacks on Comey is that he really had no choice…
    You see, The New York Times reports that these new emails were discovered by New York-based FBI agents weeks ago.

    So why the delay in announcing it? Well, that’s where things get really interesting…
    According to The Wall Street Journal, the New York agents notified FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe of their blockbuster findings on October 3.

    But they couldn’t access the emails they found because searching through them wasn’t covered under their existing warrant for Weiner.

    They needed a new warrant. So what did McCabe do?
    Nothing. He sat on his hands. He never requested one. And nothing happened for weeks.
    Why is this so important?

    Well, McCabe is the FBI official who oversaw the initial Clinton email investigation.
    He’s come under fire recently because his wife received $500,000 while running for the Virginia state senate from the political action committee (PAC) of longtime Clinton ally and current Virginia governor Terry McAullife.

    Clinton herself headlined a major fundraiser for that same PAC shortly before the group steered the cash to McCabe’s wife.

    So Mrs. McCabe received a huge sum of money from a close Clinton ally around the same time Mrs. Clinton was under an investigation led by Mr. McCabe.

    The whole episode smells awful.

    It’s therefore no shock to anyone who hasn’t had a full-frontal lobotomy why McCabe was in no rush to request a warrant for access to emails that may derail Clinton’s ambitions before Election Day.
    According to The Wall Street Journal, the only reason why a warrant to was eventually requested in recent days was because “a member of the [Justice] department’s senior national-security staff asked for an update on the Weiner laptop. At that point, officials realized that no one had acted to obtain a warrant.”
    Look, Comey’s not stupid. The Washington Post reported that he was only notified of the discovery of these new emails last Thursday.

    He knew the guy running the Clinton investigation was likely dragging his feet until after election.
    He also knew that if he did nothing given this new discovery and it turned up damning evidence against Clinton, Republicans would rake him over the coals for taking part in a conspiracy.

    So he did what any bureaucrat would do in that situation: He covered his you know what. He notified Congress of the new discovery, which let the cat out of the bag.


  2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK2K5v5bm0Q

    Hillary’s scandals and Court Cases.


  3. We should note Comey betrayed protocol when he went public the first time by not allowing the AG office to handle.


  4. John,
    In all probability.

  5. are-we-there-yet Avatar
    are-we-there-yet

    Money Brain;

    Your 5:40 pm post is the first one on this matter that makes sense, sounds reasonable and appears to be accurate. Where did it come from? I’d be surprised if it was your usual Alt-Right sources.

    Anyhow, it gives the best explanation so far for why Comey would have acted as he did.

    BTW, re. McCabe, he should be fired after the Elections, whoever wins. But note that by virtue of the 60 day rule there still would not have been enough time for McCabe or Comie to take the sort of action that Comie took at 11 days to go.


  6. are we,
    FIRED? PRISON!

  7. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @Are-we, how can you fire McCabe after prosecuting that worthy argument at 8:33 AM.

    If Comey in your view – and that of three former Attorneys General and a number of legal and elected officials- was so wrong to have acted as he did to bring the FBI into disrepute per the Hatch Act, how then is it possible that Dep Dir McCabe was wrong for seemingly not acting on that request until after Nov 8th?

    Was he not being prudent in the exact opposite way to his boss !

    Both positions can’t be right.

    @MB, you have highlighted a wonderful narrative. The fact that it purports to lay out facts but frames the details with more innuendo that reality is unfortunate. There is no secret that McCabe’s wife is a Dem who ran for office.

    Obviously he has progressed through the FBI under Democratic and Republican administrations over the years and clearly has seen his star rise ‘rapidly’ these last eight years under the Dems.

    To suggest however that he would so stupidly compromise his situation at this juncture is interesting considering that his boss is being broadly vilified by Dems and Repubs for extremely poor execution of the investigation and for acting contra established law….for doing exactly what McCabe did NOT do.

    Is there any possibility that anything anyone does may actually have some legitimacy beyond cheap political gains!!!!

    We second guess everything these days and rightly so, but when we start to conflate right and wrong with the same arguments then things are truly upside down!


  8. David

    While the Bundies confronted the federal government on lands owned by Native-Americans, with guns, and are now found not guilty by an American court, jury trial,………..

    The Native-Americans at Standing Rock are beaten up by the same government and private security firms in defense of their own ancestral, sacred, lands and water.

    The American government is as racist now as it was since before the constitution was written.

    Then Bushie would want to tell us Brassbowlery about throwing out some baby with bathwater.

    Of course, Bushie’s baby should have been chopped in a million pieces. Meaning the Native people should have allowed these effers to dies and not teach them how to survive.

    Someone say, ‘thanksgiving’. Stuepseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!


  9. At some point the US media must turn it’s attention to what manner of system would dare to spit out two candidates of the Clinton and Trump kind.

  10. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @David, don’t let get carried away because of these two ne’er-do-wells. The system has turned out thousands of Trumps and Clinton already. We pretend they are not there.

    Every year there are scandals in State House. The Governor or Chicago is still in jail for political shenanigans. Governor McDonnel of Virginia received rolex watches, vacations and more from supporters who were looking for returns in Government business etc. He was convicted and won an overturn on appeal.

    It’s the same system that produced philandering Pres Kennedy and crooked Pres Nixon. And reprobate Pres Bill Clinton!

    Don’t lets get carried away. This is nothing new. Just so totally and abjectly in our face due to the tech generation that allows such intense and immediate exposure!


  11. @Dee Word

    There is a difference between a president gone bad on the JOB and having to vote for one of two known to be bad.


  12. Barry’s Press Secty made it clear today that Barry backs Comey’s action on Friday.


  13. Dribs,
    What could be new is selling Pay for Play to Foreign Governments.

    Agreed on your other points.

    LBJ wanted the Pres real bad and many powerful people wanted JFK gone.

    Dallas seemed very convenient to me back in 1965-66 when I read pieces of the Warren Report at age 9-10. My Dad scolded me for saying the Pres had been shot which I heard on Redifusion, thought I had misunderstood, he was home early due to a passing Hurricane.


  14. @MB
    Obama’s Press Secretary said he would neither defend nor criticize Comey, don’t know where you got the notion that Obama backed Comey. The President will stay above the fray he will let others like Eric Holder do the heavy lifting.

    BTW what hurricane warning Nov.22,1963? It was an overcast Friday evening followed by an overcast Saturday but I don’t remember any hurricane warning, your memory is once again deficient.


  15. There is a report that Comey objected to the release of information that Russia was meddling in the US politics saying it was too close to the Election, the Report was released but without the imprimatur of the FBI.

    Double standards?

    http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/31/fbis-comey-opposed-naming-russians-citing-election-timing-source.html

  16. are-we-there-yet Avatar

    De Ingrunt Word;

    You said “If Comey in your view – and that of three former Attorneys General and a number of legal and elected officials- was so wrong to have acted as he did to bring the FBI into disrepute per the Hatch Act, how then is it possible that Dep Dir McCabe was wrong for seemingly not acting on that request until after Nov 8th? Was he not being prudent in the exact opposite way to his boss! Both positions can’t be right. “

    DIW, But of course both positions could be right, especially since at the end of my post I said “But note that by virtue of the 60 day rule there still would not have been enough time for McCabe or Comie to take the sort of action that Comie took at 11 days to go.” That was not as explicit as I should have made it but I was trying to suggest that McCabe might have had some justification for not doing like Comie, because of the protocol of the service.

    However, from my reading of MB’s I gleaned that McCabe, as a Deputy Director to Comie, agreed with the agents to take action which would almost certainly involve passing on the information the agents had gathered to his Boss for HIM to take the requisite action, I am almost certain that he would not have been authorized to take the action of liasing with agencies outside of the FBI directly. Yet, apparently, for two weeks, he kept the information to his chest and did not pass it on. That was a clear direliction of duty for which his Boss could have had him fired. He did not take the required action of expeditiously informing his boss of a very serious matter. That is what I thought he should be removed for.

    Of course, on the other hand, as a mitigating factor, he might have been trying to save his boss from himself as he might have known that Comie was predisposed to taking the wrong step by reacting to the information presented to him in exactly the way he did just 11 days out from the elections.


  17. Sarge,
    Good try. You might remember that the media reported that JFK was shot in the early afternoon and my Dad came home and was eating lunch when I heard the news on the Redifusion. There was a significant Weather Warning current that morning or not my Dad would not have closed his business early. You trying to be Deceptive quoting evening weather is not quite up to your usual standards. lol


  18. What the hell is Comey doing?

  19. are-we-there-yet Avatar
    are-we-there-yet

    David;

    URL please, re. your 6:02 pm post. Is there new breaking news about Comey?

    Before I left home this afternoon it seemed that the polls were apparently showing a tightening of the race towards Donald Trump. That might arguably be a good thing for Clinton as there are many segments of the population scared stiff about the portents of a Trump win and if they think that the race is close it might propel them to vote Hillary rather than staying home.

  20. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    LOLL @David @6:02PM There need not be malfeasance behind every action. The FBI is a large and complex bureaucracy and the release of the Rich pardon files data is likely in no way related to the Director and just as likely he knew not one iota about it.

    That being said whether it was due to a FOI request or whatever, it does appear as if this vaunted law enforcement agency is operating by Inspector Clouseau slap-stick fools’ standards!


  21. @Dee Word

    There comes a point when what is obvious should be stated. What is the relevance of Comey releasing info on a man who Bill Clinton pardoned in 2007?


  22. Hearing that the NYPD has the dirt on Weiner, Sicko Willie and Hilliary first, so told the FBI they will leak that all 3 named have been to Pedophillia Isle on Eppy’s Lolita Express better known as the Muff Munchers club. Hill evidently loves the underage teens too!!!

    Dem gin had to build more Prisons!

    Welcome to Club Fed sickos!

    Remember when Stokes was found in the freezer of Fergie’s boat? Could that been related to sex too????


  23. @MB
    The fact that your father came home for lunch didn’t mean bad weather was in the offing, Mustor’s was probably closed or he didn’t like the pork chop that was on offer that day. There was no hurricane warning but the weather changed that afternoon to overcast and rainy and continued the following Saturday.


  24. Breaking news the must win state fla. New polling release gives secretary Clinton a win for fla based in early voting aincluding a setting trend of latinos republican voting for clinton. The latino vote would make a huge difference for clinton as DT has not hide is vocal ouburst of sending them them back to their country of origin


  25. Sarge,
    Dont bother yourself, I was there.

  26. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @David November 1, 2016 at 7:40 PM…re”There comes a point when what is obvious should be stated. What is the relevance of Comey releasing info on a man who Bill Clinton pardoned in 2007?”—–

    You read the news feeds and are much too informed to actually accept that there is some nefarious collusion at play here by the FBI and Comey in particular.

    So, let’s agree to disagree on this as well.

    Comey made a bad misstep to send that letter to Congress. But too also now ascribe malfeasance to him on a matter which was surely handled by one of his line managers in a likely ‘routine’ action is piling on.

    That Mr Blogmaster is also stating the obvious. Yes!

    For what it’s worth, this stuff was released in “accordance with the law and established procedures” based on a FOI request .

    But truly the FBI are in a pickle and it will take good, first class investigatory analysis to reestablish their bonafides to the world public.

    I think we need to blame the operatives on the DNC side who did not seek FOI on every single Trump peccadillo to ensure they were timed for release in these last few weeks .

    Incidentally, info on Trump senior was released this weekend according to news report but that and an FOI file of the previously sealed Trump discrimination case should be on that FBI site now also.

    But what bothers everyone of course is the fact that the FBI continues to say that there is no evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign when there is overwhelming circumstantial data saying otherwise…

    Now that is the volcano I would like to explode, NOW…oh, and can someone get his taxes out by weekend. Please, definitely not the FBI tho!!! smile


  27. Bookies have still got Hill odds on favourite
    Odds have changed from 1/5 to 1/3 for Hill
    and from 9/2 to 9/4 for Trump
    More bets on Trump means Bookies lose with Trump win with Hill


  28. @DPD
    I think we need to blame the operatives on the DNC side who did not seek FOI on every single Trump peccadillo to ensure they were timed for release in these last few weeks
    +++++++++++++
    You are making assumptions who knows if they did or not they can’t dictate the timing of release of any information, regardless of the outcome the FBI is being seen as having a finger on the scales favouring one Party over the other not a good picture for a supposedly non-partisan organisation.

    Trump has been silent about a rigged Election in the last few days, perhaps its rigged in his favour.


  29. @ Sargeant
    Skippa, you should know that once the clouds were ‘dark’ Money B would see it as a threatening storm..
    His perspective has not changed in this regard… 🙂
    We are just lucky that he is not a cop….


  30. But how about Trump latest salvo encouraging those who have already voted for clinton to change their vote although legal in some states it exposes the sleezy nature of DT character in his much talked about scheming ways
    Never in the history of American politics have a candidate ignite so much controversials views in ways that have caterogerized amercan democracy as dysfunctional and which can be easily threatened
    Donald Trump has proven that the wheeling of proganda and assaults can be more efficient than truth and facts.
    However in the midst of all that has taken place the media must be blamed for the way DT was allowed to aggressively placed democracy in a juggernaut of weakness by defining what is best for himself under the banner of “taking america back”
    When all this madness is over the american media has plenty soul searching to do and plenty blame to take as a way towards redemption


  31. The FBI Vault has not update info since when?

    Some of you focus on the individual candidates when it is obvious the system is rotten.


  32. @Bush Tea

    I remember snippets of that weekend with clarity, I remember where I was and who told me (three slightly older school friends on our way from school they had heard it from the teachers’ lounge). I was always interested in history, politics and socio economic issues and that deepened my interest. I was drawn to the stories of Bobby Kennedy working to improve the lives of black people in segregated USA. Reddifusion- our major outpost to the rest of the world suspended its regular programming and played martial music that whole weekend. The weather did change that Friday afternoon, perhaps it was a harbinger of things to come, riots in the inner cities, the assassination of RFK and MLK, Vietnam, Nixon etc.

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/28/politics/march-on-washington-kennedy-jitters/


  33. Aren’t you surprised that Hillary and the presstitutes haven’t blamed Putin for FBI director Comey’s reopening of the Hillary email case? But the presstitutes have done the next best thing for Hillary. They have made Comey the issue, not Hillary.
    According to US Senator Harry Reid and the presstitutes, we don’t need to worry about Hillary’s crimes. After all, she is only a political woman feathering her nest, just as political men have done for ages. Why all this misogynist talk about Hillary? The presstitutes’ cry is that Comey’s alleged crime is far more important. This woman-hating Republican violated the Hatch Act by telling Congress that the investigation he said was closed is now reopened. A very strange interpretation of the Hatch Act. During an election it is OK to announce that a candidate for president is cleared but it is not OK to say that a candidate is under investigation.

    In July 2016 Comey violated the Hatch Act when he, on orders from the corrupt Obama Attorney General, announced Hillary clean. In so doing, Comey used the prestige of federal clearance of Hillary’s violation of national security protocols to boost her standing in the election polls.

    Actually, Hillary’s standing in the polls is based on the pollsters over-weighting Hillary supporters in the polls. It is easy to produce a favorite if you overweight their supporters in the poll questions. If you look at the crowds attending the two candidate’s public appearances, it is clear that the American people prefer Donald Trump, who is opposed to war with Russia and China. War with nuclear powers is the big issue of the election.

    Hillary’s problem has the ruling American Oligarcy, for which Hillary is the total servant, concerned. What are they going to do about Trump if he wins? Will his fate be the same as John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, George Wallace? Time will tell. Or will a hotel maid appear at the last minute in the way that the Oligarchy got rid of Dominique Strauss-Kahn?

    All of the American and Western feminists, progressives, and left-wing remnant fell for the obvious frame-up of Strauss-Kahn. After Strauss-Kahn was blocked from the Presidency of France and resigned as Director of the IMF, the New York authorities had to drop all charges against Strauss-Kahn. But Washington had succeeded in putting its French vassal, Sarkozy, in the presidency of France.

    This is how the American Oligarchy destroys those it suspects might not serve its interests. The corrupt self-serving Oligarchy makes sure that it owns the government and the media, the think tanks and increasingly all of the major universities, and, of course, through the presstitutes, Americans’ minds.

    The Oligarchs are now hard-pressed to rescue Hillary as US president, so let’s see if the Oligarchs can once again deceive the American people.

    While we wait, let’s concern ourselves with another important issue. The Clinton crime syndicate in the closing years of the 20th century allowed a small handful of mega-corporations to consolidate the US media in a few hands. This vast increase in the power of the Oligarchy was accomplished despite US anti-trust law. The media mergers destroyed the American tradition of a dispersed and independent media.

    But really, what does federal law mean to the One Percent. Nothing whatsoever. The One Percent’s power makes them immune to law. Hillary’s crimes might cost her the election, but she won’t go to jail.

    Not content with 90% control of the US media, the Oligarchy wants more concentration and more control. Looks like they will be getting it, thanks to the corrupt US government. The Federal Trade Commission is supposed to enforce US anti-trust law. Instead, the federal agency routinely violates US anti-trust law by permitting monopoly concentrations of business interests.

    Because of the failure of the federal government to enforce federal law, we now have “banks too big to fail,” unregulated Internet monopoly, and the evisceration of a dispersed and independent media.

    Not so long ago there was a field of economics known as anti-trust. Ph.D. candidates specialized in and wrote dissertations about public control of monopoly power. I assume that this field of economics, like the America of my youth, no longer exists.

    Rahul Manchanda explains that “yet again another huge media conglomerate is being swallowed and acquired by another huge media conglomerate, to create another gargantuan media outlet, in another consolidation of the enormous power, money, wealth, intimidation, conspiracy and control” that eviscerates the US Constitution and the First Amendment.

  34. are-we-there-yet Avatar

    DPD; You said in your 1:04 am post:-

    @David November 1, 2016 at 7:40 PM…re”There comes a point when what is obvious should be stated. What is the relevance of Comey releasing info on a man who Bill Clinton pardoned in 2007?”—–You read the news feeds and are much too informed to actually accept that there is some nefarious collusion at play here by the FBI and Comey in particular. So, let’s agree to disagree on this as well.

    But .. but… DPD, you read the new feeds as well and therefore know that this is not a situation where the FBI has been publishing responses to FOIA on a regular basis but is an extraordinary, unexpected release. Comey, arguably, might not have inspired and implemented it but some operative in the FBI did and the only really credible reason must have been to create confusion, either to embarrass Comey or to assist Trump. A wift of possible nefarious collusion is hanging over this that might not have been there in the absence of the earlier Comey gaffes but as of now is troubling, The FBI is now a mess, and some of that mess might be attributable to Comey’s handling of the Clinton related issues.


  35. NYPD and the FBI field opps are ready for Comey and McCabe, the Russians are nowhere in sight! Which of U dont like the TRUTH?

    U probably want more media consolidation so the media can go to the next level of Brainwashing?

    Many have been had and dont even realise yet!!!


  36. Some like this Clinton and Trunk Game to the Area 51 myth which, though possible, is best NOT BELIEVED, because, WITH BELIEF, comes alot more issues that are best not delved into.

    I cant for the life of me understand how Bill and Hilary did not see this Trojan Horse in Trunk.

    This is the classic Clyde Mascoll and David Thompson gambit.

    “Clydey, what we going do is let you pretend to be the leader for a little while but remember that no PM of barbados can be a man with a Malik Look or teets problem (so fellers like you and George payne and Dale Smiley Teets cyan be PM material)”

    OK? you agree to the sham? Good den we going do this for a short while and den you going step aside for the real ting”

    Whaplax!!

    Trump was to run for a short while and disrupt the Republicans and then step aside, and in the disruption Hilary was to enter the White House, unopposed

    But then like some feral creature Trunk gets a whiff of the WH, and not from next door on Pennsylvania Avenue in the Old General Post Office where, like the Texas School Book Repository, he and his WH pretenders would have been able to overlook said White House.

    Hilary and her team played games with Donald for too long and here they are less than 7 days away playing catchup with a man WHO DOES NOT HAVE ANY CHOICE BUT TO GET IN THE White House!!

    If he looses, he looses

    And it would have been there that any serious protagonist would have been smart enough to see the signs of how he was sustaining his campaign read where he was able to secure his funding for his campaign.

    By now however they would have found that source but here is the catch 20

    Imagine the shame to the USofA if such information is made public? IT would become the laughing stock of the world.

    So what now they have to employ option B by Saturday latest.

    Stay tuned for the blockbuster airing on a TV screen near you…


  37. Look at this, total BS, how can one person over rule the Supreme Court????????

    Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump called rival Hillary Clinton’s email investigation “bigger than Watergate.”
    Will the two scandals have the same ending?

    According to rumors, a presidential pardon is already in the works.

    Washington insiders are whispering that, win or lose, Hillary Clinton may be given the ultimate “get out of jail free” card as a departing gift from President Barack Obama after the election.
    The move would ensure that the American people not only never get the true story… but that they never see true justice, either.

    The common misperception is that the president can only pardon someone who has been convicted, or at least charged, with a crime.
    But that’s not true.

    The president can pardon anyone, anytime, anywhere, for anything except actual impeachment.

    Other than that, the Supreme Court ruled in 1866 that the “power thus conferred is unlimited” and “extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken, or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”

    Think Congress can step in? Think again – because the Court ruled on that, too:
    “This power of the President is not subject to legislative control,” the landmark Ex parte Garland decision reads. “Congress can neither limit the effect of his pardon, nor exclude from its exercise any class of offenders.”

    Yes, Obama can cut the entire Department of Justice – including the FBI – as well as all of Congress completely out of the picture with one stroke of his pen.
    Given his unprecedented reliance on executive orders… his unlimited contempt for the Republican-controlled Congress… and his extensive history of granting clemency to criminals including hardened drug dealers… is there any reason to think Obama wouldn’t give Clinton a blanket pardon?

    Washington insiders have long predicted that outcome.
    “A pardon would be a final display of Obama’s moral superiority to the woman he defeated long ago,” conservative columnist and Washington Free Beacon editor Matthew Continetti wrote in August 2015. “Exactly the sort of self-righteous gesture that most appeals to him.”
    Continetti even suggested Obama get it over with and pardon Clinton back then.
    “If not, if you let the investigation proceed, then you may have no choice but to pardon her later,” he wrote.

    Indeed, it looks like that’s exactly where this is heading… and Trump saw this one coming a mile away.
    More than one month ago – long BEFORE the FBI reopened its examination – he called on President Obama to vow not to pardon Clinton.

    Other GOP lawmakers and hopefuls have made similar demands, and Drew Ferguson – a Republican candidate for the House of Representatives in Georgia – even launched a petition urging Obama to refuse to pardon Clinton.

    “Hillary Clinton should be treated the same as you or I would be – if we were under investigation by the FBI,” Ferguson said, according to the Atlanta Journal Constitution.
    The response from the White House was exactly what you’d expect.
    Silence.

    Of course, Clinton won’t need a pardon from Obama if she wins next week – because she’ll have the ultimate “Trump” card.
    There’s no rule to stop a president from pardoning him – or her – self.


  38. MB

    You always let the alt-rightist agenda to cloud reason.

    Presidential pardon may only be given for federal crimes.

    Indeed, there are a number of state crimes being alleged that will never be covered by a presidential pardon.

    It is unwise to mouth these alt-right rantings without knowing more about more.

  39. are-we-there-yet Avatar
    are-we-there-yet

    DPD;

    Intent!…. Intent!…. Intent!…..

    This one is for you to assist in your judgement of Hillary Clinton vis a vis Donald Trump

    http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/11/01/clinton-mails-and-test-intent/PREmFjWAqwtl4amw2nZNvJ/story.html

  40. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @MB, I have always had great respect for my brethren and sisters from Kolig but good lawd man you really disrespect your alma mater and Bajan education in general with the blarney that your parrot from these alt-wacky sites.

    You take facts mix in lots of fiction and spice up with wild thoughts to present script worthy of a man who meant his time at Brumley not a leading Bajan school.

    Does it even make sense to YOU that “There’s no rule to stop a president from pardoning him – or her – self.” Steeeupse.

    That act by its nature would be grounds for impeachment if the alleged self-pardon was for any criminal or grave misdeed.

    Didn’t Tank teach you that a beach of commonsense is like the braying of a donkey. LOLL.

    @Are-We, @ 5:53…ok senor. That was a good read but I was never myself vexed or in doubt about Clinton’s intent nor frankly that of Dir Comey in sending the letter.

    Clinton deliberately and ineptly attempted to circumvent the ‘future’ FOI requests when she adopted a non state. gov email. Comey badly mishandled his ‘anger’ at having to revisit a matter that he thought was basically dun n dusted .

    As a non-lawyer I’ll leave the heavy lifting for others but from where I sit the issue of mens rea’ and all that is in no way relevant to the Weiner revelation because he possibly had access to data for which he had NO clearance and should NEVER have possessed. No intent needed there.

    We are all on Comey’s case re the Clinton link but WTF is Mr Weiner SextextFiend allegedly doing with email from the US Sec of State on his PC??

    I am surprised that that simple fact has not been the headline.

    Comey needed to be more alert to the blowback as no investigation should not be publicized midway but for all practical purposes Mr and Mrs Huma Abedin have some serious explaining to do about gross negligence, gross carelessness or malfeasance by Abedin (and by extension Clinton)!!!!

    If Clinton loses the Dems should be the ones taking her to the jail cell after Trump sics his AG on her backside for all her sloppy, self serving stupidity!

    Ideally his AG would get that matter completed just before Trump has to deal with his own wrath of Dem led impeachment investigations. I would be surprised if he lasts four years because at this point I am resolved that he may be a winner barring a taxes release or some other major stuff.


  41. Dribs,
    Does it even make sense to YOU that “There’s no rule to stop a president from pardoning him – or her – self.” Steeeupse.

    Dribs, I copied this so that a learned gent like yourself would save me much time by quoting the required Law but you could not. Therefore , how do I know that you are correct? Obviously, I suspect that this does not make sense BUT didnt Clinton pardon Mark Rich? Have not some very heinous criminals been pardoned in the past? Did U purposely neglect to read the first line which states:

    “Look at this, total BS, how can one person over rule the Supreme Court????????”

    Dribs this is malpractice on your part and you should be reported to OTTO for such a transgression. lol


  42. Pach,

    “Look at this, total BS, how can one person over rule the Supreme Court????????”

    What do U think this meant. The rest was copy/ paste as U should appreciate, I am too busy to research further especially when I believe that someone might quote the relevant Law. Where is the relevant verbiage?

    Shill must go down anyway possible.


  43. Dribs,
    At least U starting to see that Shill is dangerous.


  44. Could this be true?

    New York Police Department detectives and prosecutors working an alleged underage sexting case against former Congressman Anthony Weiner have turned over a newly-found laptop he shared with wife Huma Abedin to the FBI with enough evidence “to put Hillary (Clinton) and her crew away for life,” NYPD sources told True Pundit.

    NYPD sources said Clinton’s “crew” also included several unnamed yet implicated members of Congress in addition to her aides and insiders.

    The NYPD seized the computer from Weiner during a search warrant and detectives discovered a trove of over 500,000 emails to and from Hillary Clinton, Abedin and other insiders during her tenure as secretary of state. The content of those emails sparked the FBI to reopen its defunct email investigation into Clinton on Friday.

    But new revelations on the contents of that laptop, according to law enforcement sources, implicate the Democratic presidential candidate, her subordinates, and even select elected officials in far more alleged serious crimes than mishandling classified and top secret emails, sources said. NYPD sources said these new emails include evidence linking Clinton herself and associates to:

    Money laundering
    Child exploitation
    Sex crimes with minors (children)
    Perjury
    Pay to play through Clinton Foundation
    Obstruction of justice
    Other felony crimes
    NYPD detectives and a NYPD Chief, the department’s highest rank under Commissioner, said openly that if the FBI and Justice Department fail to garner timely indictments against Clinton and co- conspirators, NYPD will go public with the damaging emails now in the hands of FBI Director James Comey and many FBI field offices.

    “What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach,” the NYPD Chief said. “There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that.”

    The NYPD Chief said once Comey saw the alarming contents of the emails he was forced to reopen a criminal probe against Clinton.

    “People are going to prison,” he said.

    Meanwhile, FBI sources said Abedin and Weiner were cooperating with federal agents, who have taken over the non-sexting portions the case from NYPD. The husband-and-wife Clinton insiders are both shopping for separate immunity deals, sources said.

    “If they don’t cooperate they are going to see long sentences,” a federal law enforcement source said.

    NYPD sources said Weiner or Abedin stored all the emails in a massive Microsoft Outlook program on the laptop. The emails implicate other current and former members of Congress and one high-ranking Democratic Senator as having possibly engaged in criminal activity too, sources said.

    Prosecutors in the office of US Attorney Preet Bharara have issued a subpoena for Weiner’s cell phones and travel records, law enforcement sources confirmed. NYPD said it planned to order the same phone and travel records on Clinton and Abedin, however, the FBI said it was in the process of requesting the identical records. Law enforcement sources are particularly interested in cell phone activity and travel to the Bahamas, U.S. Virgin Islands and other locations that sources would not divulge.

    The new emails contain travel documents and itineraries indicating Hillary Clinton, President Bill Clinton, Weiner and multiple members of Congress and other government officials accompanied convicted pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein on his Boeing 727 on multiple occasions to his private island in the U.S Virgin Islands, sources said. Epstein’s island has also been dubbed Orgy Island or Sex Slave Island where Epstein allegedly pimps out underage girls and boys to international dignitaries.

    Both NYPD and FBI sources confirm based on the new emails they now believe Hillary Clinton traveled as Epstein’s guest on at least six occasions, probably more when all the evidence is combed, sources said. Bill Clinton, it has been confirmed in media reports spanning recent years, that he too traveled with Epstein over 20 times to the island.

    Laptop Also Unveiled More Classified, Top Secret Breaches

    According to other uncovered emails, Abedin and Clinton both sent and received thousands of classified and top secret documents to personal email accounts including Weiner’s unsecured campaign web site which is managed by Democratic political consultants in Washington D.C.

    Weiner maintained little known email accounts that the couple shared on the website anthonyweiner.com. Weiner, a former seven-term Democratic Congressman from New York, primarily used that domain to campaign for Congress and for his failed mayoral bid of New York City.

    At one point, FBI sources said, Abedin and Clinton’s classified and top secret State Department documents and emails were stored in Weiner’s email on a server shared with a dog grooming service and a western Canadian bicycle shop.

    However, Weiner and Abedin, who is Hillary Clinton’s closest personal aide, weren’t the only people with access to the Weiner’s email account. Potentially dozens of unknown individuals had access to Abedin’s sensitive State Department emails that were stored in Weiner’s email account, FBI sources confirmed.

    FEC records show Weiner paid more than $92,000 of congressional campaign funds to Anne Lewis Strategies LLC to manage his email and web site. According to FBI sources, the D.C.-based political consulting firm has served as the official administrator of the anthonyweiner.com domain since 2010, the same time Abedin was working at the State Department. This means technically Weiner and Abedin’s emails, including top secret State Department emails, could have been accessed, printed, discussed, leaked, or distributed by untold numbers of personnel at the Anne Lewis consulting firm because they can control where the website and it emails are pointed, FBI sources said.

    According to FBI sources, the bureau’s newly-minted probe into Clinton’s use and handling of emails while she served as secretary of state, has also been broadened to include investigating new email-related revelations, including:

    Abedin forwarded classified and top secret State Department emails to Weiner’s email
    Abedin stored emails, containing government secrets, in a special folder shared with Weiner warehousing over 500,000 archived State Department emails.
    Weiner had access to these classified and top secret documents without proper security clearance to view the records
    Abedin also used a personal yahoo address and her Clintonemail.com address to send/receive/store classified and top secret documents
    A private consultant managed Weiner’s site for the last six years, including three years when Clinton was secretary of state, and therefore, had full access to all emails as the domain’s listed registrant and administrator via Whois email contacts.
    Because Weiner’s campaign website is managed by the third-party consultant and political email guru, FBI agents are burdened with the task of trying to decipher just how many people had access to Weiner’s server and emails and who were these people. Or if the server was ever compromised by hackers, or other actors.

    Abedin told FBI agents in an April interview that she didn’t know how to consistently print documents or emails from her secure Dept. of State system. Instead, she would forward the sensitive emails to her yahoo, Clintonemail.com and her email linked to Weiner.

    Abedin said, according to FBI documents, she would then access those email accounts via webmail from an unclassified computer system at the State Dept. and print the documents, many of which were classified and top secret, from the largely unprotected webmail portals.

    Clinton did not have a computer in her office on Mahogany Row at the State Dept. so she was not able to read timely intelligence unless it was printed out for her, Abedin said. Abedin also said Clinton could not operate the secure State Dept. fax machine installed in her Chappaqua, NY home without assistance.

    Perhaps more alarming, according to the FBI’s 302 Report detailing its interview with Abedin, none of the multiple FBI agents and Justice Department officials who conducted the interview pressed Abedin to further detail the email address linked to Weiner. There was never a follow up, according to the 302 report.

    But now, all that has changed, with the FBI’s decision to reopen the Clinton email investigation and the husband and wife seeking immunity deals to testify against Clinton and other associates about the contents of the laptop’s emails.


  45. Harvard Trained Psycharitrist: On the Clinton;s attampted coup

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov5kvWSz5LM

  46. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @MB, you are badly misguided I see…I knew Clinton was dangerous and crooked a long time ago.

    BUT, as crooked as she is, she is still better than the racist, divisive, Russian loving, I’ll nuke their ISIS asses to kingdom-come, build a wall and tear-up all trade deals stupido!

    There is no reason to quote a law for commonsense. Old man Williams would be so angry with you. LOLL.

    Do you not think Tricky Dick wouldn’t have pardoned himself? Or Dicky Clinton? Come on be serious.

    That’s nonsense re “how can one person over rule the Supreme Court”.

    The separation of powers is very clear in the US constitution. The president has complete power to issue his executive orders. At any point where they are ultra vires then the congress has every ability to challenge said action by passing an overridng Act and or the states can challenge him in court.

    You have noticed that they (Congress/States) did that …some three times (or more) re the President’s ACA, for example, but more specifically he has been stopped stone cold with court action against his immigration plan.

    So stop repeating nonsense because it sounds pretty. Oh lawd.

    Incidentally I only know of Tank and Pepe Clarke from HC…via cadets and friends….so whomever Otto be, I suspect that he too would be aghast at your Kolig scholarship on these matters.

    I suspect they are removing all mention of your name off the Boards as we speak. LOLL,


  47. MB
    You are mining the Internet to find negative stories from dubious sources about Clinton, here is a story about voter suppression by Trump’s organization.

    Of course the people who they want to keep out of the voting booth are those whom you describe as “peeps”.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-27/inside-the-trump-bunker-with-12-days-to-go


  48. A welcome endorsement for Trump, never mind the campaign’s public comments, inwardly they are smiling their demographic is solidifying.

    http://www.npr.org/2016/11/02/500352353/kkk-paper-endorses-trump-campaign-calls-outlet-repulsive


  49. Dribs,
    OTTO was Tank’s dog!

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading