← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The fans continue to be shortchanged by the managers of West Indies cricket.
The fans continue to be shortchanged by the managers of West Indies cricket.

West Indies cricket continues at pace on a path to implosion. The WICB Board latest statement reads as follows – WICB STATEMENT FOLLOWING SEVEN HOUR MEETING. The decision by the WICB to go the route of a press statement in lieu of a press conference is indicative of the ‘peer down the nose’ approach to dealing with its publics through the years. Coincidentally, the Barbados Cricket Association (BCA) elected to do the same; communicate its mismanagement of the recruitment of a fraud as CEO of the BCA – see  The Sagicor Thieves and the BCA Fraudster – Ruel Ward and Jefferson Miller Create a WTF Moment. In both cases the two bodies probably acted under the best advice of a public relations company and not the public.

Frankly it is boring listening to leading regional cricket commentators spouting ignorance by playing the blame game for the recent muck up in West Indies cricket. It was inevitable that a dysfunctional management and operating structure would have led the region to where it finds itself currently as it contemplates whither West Indies cricket.

Instead of focussing on who did and should have done what, BU has to accept that the abandonment of the tour of India confirms a continuing the lack of leadership in the entity formerly known as the West Indies Cricket Board of Control (WICBC). An entity which lacks the capacity to resolve issues that require critical thinking. A routine requirement by any successful organization.

If the reaction by the Board of Cricket Control India (BCCI) to suspend tours to the West Indies does not signal to the hierarchy of the WICB (and regional governments) it must change to become more relevant, we will continue on a path to self destruction, if we are not there already. The best recommendation we have is for the WICB to cede control of managing cricket to a group  not to exceed eight persons. Prerequisite skill set of the group must include management, legal, cricket, financial, entrepreneurial at the core. The group will also be briefed to manage cricket until a new structure is agreed and implemented. It should be obvious the WICB lacks the capacity to engender confidence in stakeholders at this time, in addition, a system of meritocracy dictates every man jack on the Board should make their resignations available to the management group.

Dave Cameron and his ban of incompetents need to be reminded taxpayers have a vested interest in the affairs of the running of the regional sport – not just because of the historical  significance of what the game means for the region but as recent as 2007 several small and impoverish cricket loving states had to bankroll Cricket World Cup 2007 (CWC2007).

The actors involved should ruminate about the Vision, Mission and Value positions of the WICB. In a perfect world ONE common set of goals should be influencing how all decisions are being made by WICB stakeholders. It is be evident to all that WIPA, WICB and the international players are not aligned.

The people of the Caribbean deserve better!


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

70 responses to “West Indies Cricket at Implosion Point”


  1. Yes, this PR says nothing, as expected!


  2. This only goes to show that if greedy wait hot will cool. This board (WICBWC) needed to be blown up long ago. The more it changed the more it remained the same. Remember when my hero the great Viv Richards offered to make himself available to coach what was then an even more terrible team than the present one, and was unceremoniously rebuffed? Viv should they call you now, unless they agree to scrap that entire bunch, tell them to kiss your ass.


  3. Amazingly the regional media is still stuck on trivia.


  4. Sometime ago in the midst of another of their interminable sagas I wrote “Stick a fork in it, it’s done”. I’m pleased to announce that it was another of those occasions where I was blessed with amazing foresight.

    All good things must come to an end, and while I was unhappy to be the harbinger of bad news it is what it is.

    Sayonara


  5. David
    We never seem to get the rid of any establishement, in the Caribbean, within the Black race, until some kind of shift happens somewhere else. Maybe if India’s law suite for 65MM were registered against the WICB(C) then we’ll have a chance to get the rid of the lot. The lot of Black plantation elites left behind.

  6. Sunshine Sunny Shine Avatar
    Sunshine Sunny Shine

    Buppy players who think them are stars. A board that is nothing short of jobby and ignorant is tail hole. What you expected with such a mix – SUCCESS? I think not.


  7. I wondered if any of the West Indies fans from the region had followed them to India,and if so, would they be entitled to some compensation.


  8. @ SSS who wrote “players who think them are stars.”

    Some of them are stars in T20 cricket (IN INDIA ).

    I was surprised at the net worth of the Bravo brothers US$ 15 million total and Chris Gayle US$ 30 million.

    The problem in West Indies cricket is the WICB board and management do not know how to manage people who have more money than them.

    When I was growing up there was a term “powful foolish”. Windies cricket got nuff ah dem at every level.


  9. ICC will meet next month to determine the fate of West Indies. At the height of our domination of world cricket in the 80s and 90s we had little political influence in the cricket boardroom, a a minnow we should brave for the worse.

    On Wednesday, 22 October 2014, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >


  10. Hants | October 22, 2014 at 12:20 PM |

    The problem in West Indies cricket is the WICB board and management do not know how to manage people who have more money than them.

    That statement makes no sense, since most of the West Indian players during the last 4 decades were relatively poor, and the WICB experiences problems similar to the present ones throughout that period.


  11. This is not the first time the WI team has taken IR action on the eve or during a tour. At some point it if we don’t fix the problem it wil come back to bite in the rear.

    On Wednesday, 22 October 2014, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >


  12. @ Bajan in NY,

    I am writing about the situation over the last few years.

    The 20) players are in demand and some are already worth millions.


  13. The present WICB is reaping what it sowed! The first thing it did when it came into office was strip Darren Sammy of the ODI captaincy and gave it to Bravo. Sammy with his limited ability was always willing to give 100% to West Indies cricket, but the record will show the same couldn’t be said of Bravo, who was never available to the West Indies during IPL tournaments.

    I always wondered why the present WICB voted for the proposal that handed over control of the the ICC to India, Australia and England, but it is now becoming apparent it was a puppet of the BCCI. Begger can’t be choosers, so we will have to wait and see what the BCCI offers.


  14. I’m curious – who paid the return airfare for the tickets of the striking workers?


  15. Blow it up indeed…oops wrong choice of words in this war- afflicted world.

    Dismantle it! But to what? Be careful what you wish for.

    Firstly, let’s be reminded that this current version of the WICBC is a company, registered in the British Virgin Islands and ‘owned’ by the shareholder 6 territorial boards. And if we are being brutally honest it can be argued that ( since 1998 – or a bit later since the incorporation) there has been more openness or should I say more vigorous attempts of transparency to the public than at any time in the WICB’s history.
    They have listened and implemented some changes based on recommendations from the various consultants’ reports, e.g. Patterson report of 2007, Governance Committee Rep. ’12.

    Absolutely, it can also be argued that many of those attempts at transparency have been mangled and done ineptly; often it seemed the changes were 1 step forward and 2 steps back.

    But on the plus size, in this modern WICB it’s possible to get reports on the strategic plans of the board. There is a structure that is similar in very many regards to that of Cricket Australia or the ECB to name two. There is a CEO and all the relevant corporate duties/roles (CFO, Dir. Of Cricket, Corporate Attorney etc.) that are needed to properly manage a high-end revenue generating entity such as the WICB.

    So calling for re-structuring itself is irrelevant, in my view. The business model is there. Now it’s about executing.

    ** “Management is about running business and governance is about running business properly”–Patterson Report.**

    Let’s also be clear that all the persons in the key positions at WICB are well qualified and could be working at any of the top companies in the region or the world. In fact, several have gone on to other top companies or high-level government positions.

    Additionally, several of the Presidents and directors – past and present- are accomplished business people in their regular jobs: one Barbados director was a commercial bank executive officer, another was the CEO of a successful insurance company, other directors from other islands were successful bankers, senior managers, lawyers, HR executives, newspaper publishers. The current President, according to available info, is a dynamic young-man trained in management, computer technology and finance with years of experience in operational management, in his native Jamaica. The immediate past president was a diplomat, CEO of a successful company and a man of many years experience in cricket and politics regionally and in his native St. Lucia.

    So we have a practical business model and intelligent people, but as the Patterson report said 7 years ago :

    “…neither side has demonstrated a sufficient flexibility and disposition to settle industrial claims through the regular modalities of bargaining……Both the Board and WIPA should endeavour to place their relations within the mainstream of international best practices. This will be the mutual obligation of Board and players including but not limited to issues of remuneration but also the strict observance of Codes of Conduct and Ethics by the two parties.”

    That report also said (to repeat,7 years ago): “Constantly leaking self-serving information is counter-productive in the extreme.”

    Do we need to be reminded that the executives at WICB issued just last week another round of self-serving (and inaccurate) press releases.

    So based on all that many people, their brother, sister, 2nd cousin and likely Ossie Moore have said it’s very clear that this is really about the entrenched MIND-SET and the PEOPLE who maintain those warped priorities: they have to depart or be removed.

    But this has been on-going for well over 10 years now and our very, very best Caribbean minds: skilled politicians, professors, businessmen, bloggers and more have reported, editorialized and otherwise weighed in on the subject but yet nothing has seemingly changed because WI cricket is on its knees.

    ** “Unable to find a new path the WICB has become introspective, conflict-prone and defensive; and this at a time when the opposite values and mentalities are required in order to emerge from inadequacy to relevance.” **

    That was said by Sir Hillary Beckles, not in Oct. 2014 but in 2007 and disappointingly has exactly the same significance as if it was just spoken.

    So…where are we going to find the PEOPLE with the right MIND-SET to enforce the real change that is needed?

    Wanted: CEO who values WI cricket more than his/her ego.


  16. @ Dee Word | October 22, 2014 at 8:43 PM |

    I have read all your postings since you appear to be calling it as you see it rather than having a pro WICB or a pro players bias that some of the other posters seem to have, so I’ll ask you two questions to you. Do you believe the WICB has the financial resources to pay the players what there are demanding and institute the proposed profession cricket league? How much damage do you believe this latest development has damage the prospect of future sponsorship?


  17. @Dee Word

    In all that you wrote you ignored Rawle Brancker’s proposed model to make cricket a public company. The problem is that the present structure is not working,.


  18. When will we see people being fired at the WICB after this debacle? The same crap by a different colour.


  19. @Bajan in NY: ”Do you believe the WICB has the financial resources…pro league”

    Based on their current financial status & situation: Absolutely Not. They are coming off a $5M loss in their last financial year and $15M from the previous year. Their balance sheet is also not strong.

    Based on their management’s projections, advertising, sponsorship and other corporate deals: Possible, but with grave doubts.

    The Pro League has to be self sufficient so they must have excellent sponsorship or assured financial backing to make that jump. In this climate no sane business CEO will want to marry his brand with this flawed WICB.

    So, they have once again and absolutely profoundly this time cut their noses to spite their face. This time around there is a need for a face-transplant as no minor surgery to the nose can fix this damage.

    Short term sponsorship/advertising business…zilch.


  20. Poor human resources management. Collective bargaining (industrial relations) is a facet required in every business entity with or without a third party to represent the employees.

    Wavell Hinds is solely responsible for the final straw that broke the ‘camel’s back.’

    Employers ought to remember that they are working with human beings with feelings, intelligence and decision making abilities. There are consequences to actions both the employer as well as the employee.

    Clearly the arrogance by Cameron and agreement by Wavell (pure stupidity) without consideration of the workers/players showed in 2014 that employees do not have to remain employed under the terms of management that adversely affects the employees.

    Employees are not furniture nor equipment although they are assets. They are not fixed assets that you depreciate at your whim and fancy.

    Every employee worldwide should be stronger and bolder when negotiating terms and conditions of employment forthwith.

    This is wonderful.

    The losses cannot be compared to the power showed by the employees of their human nature and value to the employer.


  21. This is a lesson to every employer – employees will take so much and no more.


  22. @ David:

    I did not cite Mr. Brancker’s reports directly as I didn’t many others but I am familiar with his strident calls over the years.

    That matter of a ‘public’ company has actually been ventilated in the report previously cited. It’s not a ‘Brancker’ specific idea.

    But more importantly though whether the WICB was public or not would not have changed anything. The same people would have been there basically.

    As you know, in this business context all ‘public’ means is that the shareholders would be many and varied and not just the few country cricket boards as is currently the case.

    Whether public or private they will have to discharge their duties in the same transparent way with audited financial statements etc, etc. There are other nuanced differences but I can’t see them being fundamental game changers.

    Consider that Sagicor is a ‘public’ company with many shareholders like maybe you or I or Sir Hillary Beckles. None of us or any of the other general shareholders can control who is CEO or the strategies the company adopts.

    Yes, as Sir Hillary did years ago you attend shareholder meetings and demand change and get a seat on the board to continue that push.

    Interestingly, in this case he and other wise voices have been closely affiliated with the WICB for many years.

    Consider further that the Caribbean government’s have a vested interest in WICB, after all they had to back-stop the finances of the world-cup and underwrite the costs of all the lovely stadia throughout the region. They are not (maybe rightly so) shareholders to WICB either, but certainly they have strong persuasive power.

    That influence wasn’t used last week, was it; apparently given, but not used.

    So yes, the matter of exposing the WICB to public shareholder ownership is a good business discourse and likely a good business practice but for all practical purposes it would have changed not one iota in this scenario.

    Or add one $1 to the sorry state of the WICB coffers.

    It’s still the people, sir not the model.


  23. @Dee Word

    WICB going public removes the manipulation by a few who get to sit on the Board. By democratizing the shareholding WICB gives itself a chance to dispel the lack of tranarency issue and quell some of the politics associated with decision making located in insurality of small island politics. Currently the WICB is a elite club supported by territorial clubs.

    It was not Brnckets idea but he has been the most strident advocate.

    On Thursday, 23 October 2014, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >

  24. Ding Bat de Rat Avatar

    Barbados Government –Destroyers of all they survey with an anti-Midas touch
    WICB –Destroyers of West Indies cricket and West Indian Ideals. Nonsense is all they do –Nonsense with an anti-Midas touch
    Central Bank Governor agent for destruction;President of WICB -agent for destruction. Where is Freudel Stuart hiding ? Under a rock ?

  25. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Brief | October 23, 2014 at 7:18 AM |
    “Clearly the arrogance by Cameron and agreement by Wavell (pure stupidity) without consideration of the workers/players showed in 2014 that employees do not have to remain employed under the terms of management that adversely affects the employees.”

    The above encapsulates the problem currently facing West Indies cricket. Exceedingly piss-poor management that extends right across the social, economic and political spectra of too many English-speaking Caribbean countries. Just take a look at what is happening in Barbados today and the recent fiasco in relation to the hiring of Miller as CEO of the BCA.

    Correct me if I am wrong in my interpretation and assessment of the situation. But how could Wavell Hinds (as it is alleged) surreptitiously agree with the Board to unilateral adjustments or alterations to the terms and conditions in players’ contracts of services without the unanimous consent and express approval of the players themselves?

    What kind of ‘plantation’ mentality is that?


  26. David
    What does Samuels mean? Could this be a Jamaica first mindset?


  27. @Miller

    Does Cameron represent the view of the collective Board? By your comment it makes it that The Board is a one man shop.

    @Pacha

    Samuels is not a member of WIPA, he has an agent American style.

    On Thursday, 23 October 2014, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >


  28. Bowl at Boycs
    ‘It’s up to the WICB to win the players over’
    October 23, 2014

    Dwayne Bravo arrives at the toss with his team-mates, India v West Indies, 4th ODI, Dharamsala, October 17, 2014
    “When the WICB won’t deal with their own players or tell them what the deal is, then something’s not right there” © BCCI
    Vishal Dikshit: Hello and welcome to a brand new episode of Bowl at Boycs. I have with me the guest of the show, Geoffrey Boycott, who has just turned 74. How does it feel?

    Geoffrey Boycott: No different from being 73. And I hoping I can say that when I’m 75.

    VD: The first question was sent by TV Subramaniam from India. He says: I have been a great admirer of West Indian cricket and I’m really pained to see what is happening both on the field and off the field. I have a feeling that it is not long before West Indies as a team collapses, and in the near future we may find some of the islands constituting West Indies bidding for separate entities. What’s your view on that?

    GB: The only difficulty in answering this is that we can only go on the reports we have heard. We haven’t heard all the players speak or the chief executive for the players association. We got to be careful here a little bit with the reports suggesting that the West Indies players are unhappy with their own representative, Wavell Hinds, signing some agreement with the WICB, and this agreement doesn’t seem to say exactly what the players had agreed with their own representative. So they are a bit aggrieved, and the West Indies board won’t speak to the players and tell them what they’ve signed up for. The players, naturally, are pretty upset and irate and angry, they don’t know what the hell’s going on or what they are supposed to have signed for. So you have an impasse. When the WICB won’t deal with their own players or tell them what the deal is, then something’s not right there. You have to talk to the people. You are the bosses.

    I think what’s worst of all is that the West Indies players don’t seem to have that much confidence in their own chief executive. When he’s not able to do what they want, then you’ve got a difficult situation. I don’t see how you can act as chief executive of players if the players have no confidence in you.

    All this has been going on for a while with the WICB and the players. It’s only matter of time before some players will say, “Look, I’ve had enough of this.” Some of the older players, who’ve still got big names, will say, “Listen, I don’t need all this in my life, not knowing what the hell’s going on. My bosses don’t talk to us, and we’re always having fractious moments, troublesome difficulties. I’m going to play the IPL in India because I get a lot of money for that and it’s fun and I enjoy it. And then maybe I’ll sign up for the Big Bash in Australia, because that fits in with the IPL – it’s not played at the same time. And then I’ll make myself like Kevin Pietersen and I’ll go on and play T20 anywhere in the world that I fancy and just go for the money for the last few years of my career.” Without the big-name players, West Indies cricket will be poorer.

    A number of countries like Pakistan, Zimbabwe, New Zealand, Sri Lanka are already short of cash. The crowds are poor when they are playing Test cricket; even some one-dayers aren’t sold out or well supported. So already they’re on a slippery financial slope. And if the [big] players stop playing, and say, “Hell, I don’t need this” then I don’t know what to do. I think it will unravel like that.

    I don’t think the islands can go on their own as the gentleman with the question suggested. I don’t think they are strong or good enough, I don’t think they have the financial clout to do it. You’ll find that a lot of these countries are in serious financial difficulty. Money is at the root of it. There just isn’t enough money to keep these countries afloat playing Tests, T20, one-day.

    And there’s been trouble for some time between players and the officials in the West Indies. It’s simmering underneath all the time, it’s ready to burst at any moment, and I think there will have to be a compromise. Somebody will come along and be a mediator, knock the two sides together, their heads together, and solve it. But you get a feeling that whatever they solve, underneath there will be an uneasy truth that will be ready to burst out again in the near future. There’s too much frustration and irritation, lack of trust between the two parties, and I don’t see it getting better. It will just be make-up time for a short period and then it will blow up again.

    VD: And what do you think the board and the players should do to avoid such situations in the future?

    GB: Not to be big-headed. The board has to talk to the players. You can’t treat the players like a schoolmaster giving the pupils a cane. Many of these players are iconic names, they earn fortunes now, going to the IPL so they’re not going to take the big stick from the bosses. And if you’re a really good boss in any walk of life, in any business – and cricket in some ways is a business as well as a way of life – you have to talk to the people who work for you. You can’t just act as if, “I’m the boss. That’s it. Take it or leave it. You do what I say.” You can’t do that anymore. You have to sit down and talk sensibly. People don’t just work under you, they work for you. The good bosses in any walk of life – business, commerce or sport – have to win the hearts and minds of the people who are working with you and for you. Just telling them what to do won’t work. Yes, you do have the authority to make decisions but the clever bosses, the good bosses, the sensible bosses, the ones who understand people talk and realise you have to win your people over. It’s up to the board to win the players over, not just wield the big stick.


  29. No time for India and West Indies to squabble
    Why the BCCI should use a carrot, not a stick, in its approach to the WICB
    Mark Nicholas
    October 23, 2014

    Again, the IPL is an eminent candidate for blame in a cricket controversy © BCCI
    If I was a West Indian cricketer with an IPL contract who had just pulled out of the Indian tour, I would be nervous. In order to appear in the IPL, each player must be issued with a no-objection certificate by his own board of control. If the WICB is of a mind to teach its employees a lesson, it has it right there, in the palm of its hand. But it won’t. It is one thing to mess with the BCCI’s tour schedules, quite another to play loose with the IPL.

    Frankly, the WICB took an almighty gamble allowing the players to tour India with contractual issues hanging over them. Perhaps the board had taken advantage of Wavell Hinds – a pussycat compared to his predecessor as head of the players association, Dinanath Ramnarine – in the recent negotiations and resulting MOU and figured the players needed its support more than vice versa. Big mistake. Huge. Though the players’ international performances do not justify inflated sums, they are due an income that is requisite to their commitment. The deal struck by Hinds appeared to be soft.

    Thus, the action taken by the West Indian players is understandable, if unwise. One cannot help but think that this embarrassment would have been avoided had Darren Sammy still been captain. Sammy may not have been the finest all-round player of the game to grace the Caribbean but he held the cricketers of these disparate islands together. And he was lucky to have that dog fighter Sunil Narine in his corner. Between them, they would have known that the downside of such radical activism outweighs its impact.

    In contrast, the Sri Lankan players have never allowed ongoing disputes over money with their own board to compromise their schedule. They are too proud and enthusiastic for that. Instead, the quality of their performances has forced the board to respond to many of their requests, though sadly not all.

    The West Indian players have lost that sense of pride, their single most important attribute during the years of plenty. From Sir Frank Worrell, through Sir Garfield Sobers, Clive Lloyd and Viv Richards, West Indies had leaders who commanded immense respect. Their priorities were clear and their message was simple: we are West Indies, we are as one, we will not be broken. But Dwayne Bravo has broken West Indies cricket in two. His intention for the players is worthy enough. His method of achieving it is anything but. A once sparkling personality is now burdened by heavy responsibility. Let us hope that Bravo’s infectious love of the game is not a thing of the past.

    What happens next? Will India really pursue legal action? Unlikely. West Indies have no money. More likely, with time, is that the WICB will win over the BCCI. In fact, take that as a given. After all, it was only a year ago that West Indies bailed India out of the South Africa tour-Sachin Tendulkar retirement conundrum. It deserves a plea bargain for that alone. Will they agree on some bipartisan agreement that demands even more of the players? Probably. Will West Indies play in the World Cup? Bet on it. At the core of this dispute is the WICB and its shoddy leadership. Yes, it is Bravo’s issue with the WIPA that led to the impasse but it is the board that, ongoingly, fails to establish the trust of their players. Twenty years of feeble administration has led to three major strikes, many more disagreements, and a game that has lost its place at the high table.

    A surprise, or should we say the pity, is that the BCCI did not use its muscle to bail out the WICB. Had they found a tour fee for the players, the immediacy of the dispute could have been avoided

    The key figures in this team will pay a price, Bravo first among them, of course. Possibly he will lose his job, though you hope not. Yes, it will be hard for the board to rely on him going forward, unless, of course, they bring him in. The general view is that the present West Indies players are rather too pleased with themselves. Chris Gayle is one cited as brilliantly gifted but infuriatingly blasé. This comes from the riches bestowed upon him, and his ilk, by the IPL.

    Indeed, much of the angst that is circling around cricket right now might be attributed to the IPL. The Gayle example; the Pietersen book (after all, the key issue in the Pietersen story is the question of IPL or ECB, and for KP that is a no-brainer); India’s appalling capitulation on tours to England and Australia (might the ECB seek compensation from the BCCI for the unnecessarily early finishes to the fourth and fifth Tests of the recent tour to England?) Did MS Dhoni’s response to the question about the weight of defeat Old Trafford – he said the team could do with the rest – suggest an indifference to his accountability as captain? Is the IPL a drain on India’s capacity and interest at Test level? And a drain on the captain?

    When you consider the overall effect of the IPL and the extraordinary way in which the players have embraced it, you wonder if the game is ripe for another coup. Many years ago Kerry Packer found it just as easy as the IPL does now to seduce the best cricketers in the world. A world Test championship is needed to bring greater context to the most important form of the game. Such an event was scheduled for 2017 but when the big three came together, it was cast aside for more short-form cricket.

    There will be an argument that the BCCI had this West Indian mess coming. India bankrolls the game and from that comes an arrogance that leads it to think itself irresistible. Obviously this specific situation is far from India’s doing but, for once, the BCCI has not been in control of its own destiny. There are those in South Africa and elsewhere who will be tickled by that.

    A surprise, or should we say the pity, is that the BCCI did not use its muscle to bail out the WICB. Had they found a tour fee for the players, the immediacy of the dispute could have been avoided. The West Indian players clearly had the state of mind to play good cricket. Their performance in Kochi was sensational. Richards praised them for it and for seeing good sense. Little did he know what lay beneath the surface of that public face. If only Bravo’s men had behaved with the same dignity that the Sri Lankans have so often managed. Dignity is nearly always the best way.

    And if only the BCCI, in harness with England and Australia, would now act like the leaders of the world game they purport to be. This is not a time for squabbling, it is a time for direction. West Indies cricket is in trouble. Take a carrot, not a stick.

    Mark Nicholas, the former Hampshire captain, presents the cricket on Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK


  30. West Indies cricket under the present structure – WICB,respective regional boards,player’s union and players themselves was always heading towards total collapse.
    Present president David Cameron dismantling the Combined Colleges and Campus cricket with the flimsy excuse that the team had in too many Bajans..This in effect deny fringe players not only from Barbados but from all the other regional teams enrolled at either university or college a chance to show case the skills.But David Cameron and his hatred and dislike for Barbados cricket and Barbados made the decision to curtail the aspirations of many young Caribbean cricketers with that nonsensical decision.The sad thing about it that our local cricket board did not respond or came to the defense of our local cricketers after that attack by David Cameron.
    David Cameron and the in-competencies of our regional crickets boards were brought to the fore with the introduction of the franchise league for the regional four day series.The in-competent was highlighted with the draft system. No proper planning.We witness the farcical scene whereby almost all the regional teams selected players from their own country from the draft system.Laughable.
    The time has long passed for the old boy’s clubs that make up the WICB to be abolished and be replaced with individuals and groups that that have the interest of West Indies cricket at heart.While at it there should also be a name change.The old name West Indies is not reflected of who we are in this region.The majority of us heritage is African and not Indian.I am no damn Indian..I always held the view that the name West Indies is not a true reflection of the region.The Caribbean Cricket team ought to be name use.
    If we do not dismantle the structure of West Indies cricket at this moment,I foresee the continuation of the ruination that has now engulf West Indies Cricket.


  31. It is all about money nowadays with pride for country almost a zero consideration.


  32. I fondly remember my uncle taking me to kensington stadium in 1974 to watch the W.I. vs England in which Lawrence Rowe scored 302 runs. It was absolutely amazing. Cricket was a tremendously unifying force in the Caribbean; I guest it’s not the same anymore.


  33. Worried sponsors pile pressure on WICB

    FRI, OCTOBER 24, 2014 – 7:55 PM

    THE WEST INDIES Cricket Board (WICB), reeling from the fallout from the team’s withdrawal from the tour of India, is facing fresh pressure from its worried commercial and broadcast partners.

    West Indies cricket was plunged into a major crisis after the tourists abandoned their series in India over a protracted payment dispute between the players and their board.

    The Indian cricket board (BCCI), the most powerful body in the sport, responded by suspending all future tours with the Caribbean team and beginning legal action against the WICB – moves that could have a devastating financial impact.

    Oliver McIntosh, chief executive officer of Digicel Sportsmax, the pan-Caribbean sports television network, says he is worried about the forthcoming West Indies tour of South Africa and says the WICB needs to undergo serious changes.

    “We are due to broadcast West Indies tour of South Africa in December and January. We have invested a lot of money in the rights and in the talent. We have started marketing it, we have sponsors on board and if that doesn’t happen, you totally retract, you have to go back to sponsors and give back money,” he told Reuters in an interview.

    “We are worried. It does impact our audience. If West Indies cricket is no longer on, that is a big blow for us, a big blow,” added McIntosh, who was in Barbados for the Soccerex Americas Forum, which ended on Wednesday.

    While in the past governments in the Caribbean have intervened in the various crises that have afflicted West Indies, McIntosh says that it is sponsors and other backers who need to start pushing the WICB to make major changes.

    “What has to happen in this case is that the private interests have to get involved and say, ‘Look, if I have a stake here, if you want me to stay involved and want me to continue to help funding the cricket, this is how it has to go’,” he said.

    Telecommunications company Digicel, which recently bought Sportsmax, is well established as the main backer of West Indies cricket and is likely to sit down with the WICB in the near future.

    “Like all cricket fans, we’re disappointed when matches don’t happen,” Digicel said in a statement issued to Reuters on Thursday.

    “To be clear, our contract is with the WICB. And it is with the WICB that we must have a discussion. As such, we will not be commenting for the time being.”

    While several efforts have been made to reform the WICB during the past two decades of decline on the field, and Twenty20 cricket has enjoyed plenty of success in the region, conflicts have continued throughout different leaderships.
    McIntosh believes that major reform is needed.

    “The board has to be restructured. You need to get some independent people on the board who are not going to run it on a country basis. Whenever there is a new president elected and he is from Jamaica, then the CEO comes from Jamaica and then if he’s from St Lucia then it’s a St Lucian.

    “It has to be what is best for cricket and developing cricket. I think that private interests are going to have to get involved in saying it is not going to work [like this].” (Reuters)


  34. The West Indies Women’s Cricket team is now in Australia, perhaps we could have salvaged the tour in India somewhat ,by re-deploying the Women’s team to India. Can’t do much worse.


  35. Just when you thought the impasse couldn’t get any worse, Bravo has come public to say Samuels attended most of the meetings and backed the decisions made. Now the players are having a go at each other. You can’t make this stuff up as TB use to say.

    http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/latestnews/Bravo–All-players-in-the-loop–shocked-at-Samuels–statement-if-true


  36. Yes David, this will be the seminal fight in WI cricket as it’s really started as a players disagreement.

    All good in my view, because from this seed of discord will sprout the garden of changes for which you and other scribes here have clamoured,

    There is no practical way forward for WI cricket otherwise; so says their TV partner and key corporate partner as he invoked sponsors to demand change.

    Nothing before it’s time they say; so finally there will be action with strands from the Griffith report when Sir Clyde was president, Brancker’s calls from when the company was incorporated in 1998, the ’07 report and all other consultations giving birth to change.

    Because the money demands it. After all, this is a business and money talks and all else walks; it’s just BS. Well the BS just stopped.

    Of course, the current WICB do have three non-territorial or ‘independent’ directors (all acclaimed top business pros) so the changes here will indeed involve additional structural mods but the real change will be about governance: running the business properly.

    No more will this folly of ego supremacy be allowed.


  37. ++++Cricinfo: Asked why he was not accredited to the players’ body, Samuels revealed the only reason was the way WIPA left him out “in the cold” when he was serving at two-year ban for having links with an Indian bookmaker. “Since I got the two-year ban I was left in the cold, on my own. I have to get my own lawyer. I have to do everything on my own. WIPA wasn’t there for me. So I come back into cricket and choose not to be a part of WIPA because WIPA did not help me. So I do not feel like I should do anything for WIPA.” ++++

    Another option would have been to join WIPA and add his voice to their leadership and ensure that the poor way how he was treated was never experienced by another player in the future.

    But that would have taken actual maturity and critical thinking after being treated as he was allegedly. He was not able to dig that deeply it seems. Maybe most people wouldn’t.

    De facto of course he is very much a ‘WIPA member’ in all but payment of dues or whatever token that binds players to the group.


  38. @Dee Word

    Agree with you.


  39. Is that it?

    Joint WICB, WIPA and player representative statement following Kingston meeting http://t.co/1wYyBrjqNt

    Joint WICB, WIPA and player representative statement following Kingston meeting


  40. David, I find these words from Ian Bishop very instructive and a succinct coda to this debate.

    He said : “If India weren’t as kind, and they are being kind because they can take the West Indies to the cleaners, you could kill the goose that laid the golden egg for you. You could wipe the whole thing out ….The West Indies board as well, they understand television rights … so they should have understood the impact and maybe have moved in sooner to cull this whole antagonism that was going on.”

    With that in mind, I posit that Dave Cameron and the WIBC CEO should not now be leading this round of negotiations.

    Either they deliberately brought matters to a head to suit a back-room agenda they have or they were too short-sighted to see the impact of their reactions.

    Neither of those postulations establishes a sense of confidence in their leadership.

    Other directors, ideally the independents, should be the ones to lead this along with the attorneys and report back to President.

    When this is over the President should resign. Tony Cozier posed some excellent queries that a man in the CEO position should never have allowed to be questions i.e. his experience and business acumen would have led him to to resolve those nagging points from inception.

    A key query/point from TC:
    +++ “Would he like to comment on the BCCI’s revelation that it had received his email …. 11 hours before the scheduled start of the first ODI in Kochi, stating that he was withdrawing the team from the tour?…Was he aware that, as the BCCI timeline put it, its secretary Sanjay Patel “rushed to Kochi and spoke to the players and managed to get on with the match”? +++

    People don’t stop being smart all of a sudden so you are either actually not as good as you appear to be or you planning big-foot move or you are on medication (approved or otherwise).

    Also, unless it can be shown that the CEO advocated holding the MOU in abeyance until the end of the tour and was overruled in this view, he too should be thanked for his services with an appropriate severance and given wonderful references for his next career move.


  41. @Dee Word

    You should recall BU’s position is that the buck stops with the WICB notwithstanding the ‘institutional role’ WIPA must play. WICB’s role before the abort could easily have been validated by having WIPA at the table therefore respecting the tripartite arrangement.


  42. The BCCI understands the importance of Gayle. Bravo, Pollard and Russell to the IPL.

    The money in today’s cricket is in T20 (an equivalent to baseball) with a massive television audience.


  43. David wrote “the buck stops with the WICB ”

    nuff said.


  44. This is what the Indian fans care about. That is why the BCCI may not bankrupt the WICB.

    http://www.royalchallengers.com/chris-gayle


  45. Could this $44+millions that the Indians are demanding,the last straw that will kill the West Indies Cricket Club , as we know it ? Over the years we have lost the West Indies Federation, then the (British)
    West Indies Airways,among other entities bearing “west indies” in their titles.
    After the dust has settled , will we see emerged, like Caribbean Airlines, CCC, Caribbean Cricket Club or T&TCC,Trinidad and Tobago Cricket Club.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading