Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler imposes another tax on Barbadians
Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler imposes another tax on Barbadians

The government of Barbados has delivered on a promise to implement the municipal solid waste tax on an already overtaxed Barbadian. The tax is introduced in the  Municipal Solid Waste Tax Bill, 2014 as, “There shall be charged, levied and collected on the site value of improved lands”.

There has been a lot of discussion about the tax but BU is confident Barbadians -for the good of country – will dig into savings and ask the bankers to increase limits on credit cards.

Barbadians are aware the government is cash strapped and is currently on a quest to find creative ways (used loosely) to generate revenue by levying taxes hither thither and yon. Some argue successive governments have not done enough to efficiently collect taxes owed to the crown. Several blogs have been posted to BU identifying Courts Barbados, a leading furniture and appliance store in Barbados who owes BD$25 million in VAT.  The article $200 owed has appeared in the traditional press further highlighting government’s leaky collection management system. Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler in his defence recently established  the Barbados Revenue Authority (BRA) whose remit is to efficiency address tax collection.  Government agencies are not known in Barbados for being efficient but the BRA has the opportunity to be a trail blazer.

Barbadians will bombard the call-in shows, post to social media but will PAY the solid waste tax, do not look for any civil disobedience to match the Poll Tax Riots. The tax is a burden to many at this time and was made so by poor implementation. BU understands the tax invoices were mailed on June 15, 2014 and according to the Act were due on June 30, 2014. After a public outcry the authorities announced the date extended to July, 2014. It is inconceivable our policymakers could not have anticipated the window to pay was too narrow and proactively extend the payment date to pre-empt wasteful public discussion.

Many questions have been asked about the quality of decision to impose a solid waste tax. At the top of the list is the obvious decision by landlords who will pass on the tax to tenants.  Then there is the middleclass who have had to give up a significant chunk of disposal income in the last six years to shore up government’s revenue. It is this same group who has to find tuition fees, pay mortgages, car loans etcetera. The end result is a fall in the quality of life for many Barbadians. Often times if it is made clear why a sacrifice has to be made many will gladly do so. Are the majority of Barbadians confident the government by example and quality decision making is on the right path?

What has informed the decision by government to levy a tax on Barbadians who have toiled to create wealth by owning property in the last 20 years? Who the hell penalizes individuals who purchase property especially given the history of the dominant Black population? Senator McClean’s assurance that “… a property with a site value of $100,000 with a solid waste tax of 0.3 per cent means that the property owner will have to pay a tax of $300 per annum. The point I am making is that some people were saying that it was going to be a very large sum of money, but that is not the case. So basically what this tax is intended to do, is help Government pay for the cost of our growing consumption and generation of garbage whether it is household waste or commercial waste.” – Not for everyone does not show sympathy at all. The solid waste bills have started to litter mailboxes.

One can only assume the Municipal Solid Waste Tax describes the sorry state of government’s finances. Who the hell  tax the property of a fledgling middleclass?


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

152 responses to “Fledgling Middleclass et al to Pay Municipal Solid Waste Tax”

  1. Mr Watson Parkinson Avatar
    Mr Watson Parkinson

    Call this tax what you will, in my view, it’s a direct copy of the UK Poll Tax…! Beware people, this tax will increase…! 0.3% per $100.000 is reasonable, imagine 1% per $100.000…!


  2. Everyone has to be aware this WASTE TAX has NOTHING to do with WASTE, other than it’s necessary because of GOVERNMENT WASTE and mis-management. Remember when it was called the Greening Levy.

    It’s merely an attempt by a bunch of incompetent politicians doing a CYA, that’s Cover Your Ass.

    My suggestion is that no Bajan pay the TAX at a rate of 0.3%, but follow the Ministers suggestion of paying only $300.00 period.


  3. This is the single most stupid tax that has ever been conceptualized by anyone, anywhere…..and it demonstrates why retards should never be entertained in leadership positions.

    Even a certified jackass instinctively imposes taxes on activities that are impeding national progress….
    Things like …
    ….. Exotic imports
    …….luxury goods
    …….imported foods that can be grown locally
    ……expensive and polluting fossil fuel
    ….. Luxury travel
    …….perks such as the lotta unnecessary MP cars

    But how is there any value in taxing the ownership of homes?
    Who the hell seeks to discourage citizens investing in their own homes or setting aside something in a credit union for their children?

    Obviously these DLP second-rate jokers are just scrambling to collect money however they can….and they don’t have the balls to touch the perks of their business financiers, their leper friends or of the political class…..so they are going after the Credit Union and ordinary home owner….

    This is like a parent mismanaging the family finances – and then going after the children’s piggy bank…..

    A curse on Stinkler and the mousey Froon.


  4. …and if the owner (not the person who collects the rent) of a property lives overseas, what now wunnah idiots!! How many o/seas addresses y’all got? Stupse.


  5. Fed up…Do you get a land tax bill? Where is it sent? Who pays it for you? This is just another land tax bill but they just trying to fool us.


  6. Local farmer Tyrone Power died yesterday.

  7. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ David (BU):

    Do you have access to the actual piece of legislation governing the Solid Waste Tax?
    It would be interesting to see the recovery options available to the Minister for the non-payment of the tax.

    If the tax is not on the land can the land and property be sold for the recovery this so-called municipal solid waste imposition?
    There could be some serious Constitutional questions to be answered here.

    Why not tax the activities and products that lead to the generation and accumulation of solid waste.

    How about imposing a “Fat Tax” on the fast food outlets to be passed on to consumers, of course?
    What about imposing a tax on vehicles that are in excess of 1600cc’s and are in reality nothing but a ‘solid waste’ of forex in every form?

    As was pointed out earlier by a blogger the Solid Waste Tax is nothing but a Council Tax or Rates on homeowners in addition to the regular property tax.

  8. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad

    How about everyone just take all your cars back to the car lots and drop them off, Stop paying insurance and car note as well as road tax, Now what will they do,
    Jack up all other taxes to cover road taxes and we all use ZR VANS and taxi when needed?
    We all need to get horses and ride and they will see how the gas station SOL behave,
    For us , no more road tax, no more insurance, no more gas, no tires, let the buses be filled ,
    Once again those who dont have clear title have nothing to worry about , Some will pay taxes for they know they are crooks and will pay taxes to hope or to think they own what they pay taxes on , More Fraud,
    make the DBLP prove you have clear title to land and house before you keep paying on what you dont own , Different levels of fraud but still fraud,
    While fat boy overseas like a big bitch looking for more money to feed the fraud, Sinkman MOF.


  9. I am here watching a current affairs program on Global Televison in Toronto..It is called 16:9 The bigger picture.

    The story is about a company with an office in BARBADOS whose’s owners LIVE IN A BEACH HOUSE IN BARBADOS.

    More publicity for Barbados.

    http://globalnews.ca/national/program/16×9/

  10. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad

    Wily Coyote | June 28, 2014 at 6:16 PM@ once you pay you will never stop paying, You are not typing in the best thinking of the people, PAY hell, go after Courts , LIME , light and power who ever first , Put the POLICE Mi6 Scotland Yard after the Ministers to return the money Dennis the Crook Lowe and family took from the government,

  11. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad

    Hants | June 28, 2014 at 8:14 PM | Good site, now all need to get the picture of the crimes against the state of Barbados,
    PDC hurry up and POST ,you are in your ZONE NOW


  12. David I hope you watch the video. It is worth it.

    Example how Investigative journalism works in Canada.

  13. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    The Barbados Revenue Authority was established on the orders of persons outside of this country who do not understand how things work around here. There was no need for this authority in its present form.

    The problem is the collection of the taxes that were already levied. Government should have established a unit to collect the arrears. All revenue outstanding in excess of three months from all departments could have been transferred to that unit for collection. Instead, Government disrupted four departments because they want to appear as though they are doing something.

    Political interference prevented public officers from collecting taxes from politically connected persons. The BRA will sufer the same fate.

  14. Truth is hard for fools Avatar
    Truth is hard for fools

    Audit needed NOW


  15. @David “and ask the bankers to increase limits on credit cards”

    David it makes no sense to borrow money on a credit card (with their interest rates of between 7 and 22 %) in order to pay the municipal tax.

    Does it make sense for a citizen to bankrupt himself or herself in order to pay an unjust tax? Better to let the land become encumbered with the tax, and make the government wait until you are dead to collect the tax.

    What kind of mad world are we living in?


  16. The tax on the old family home in the country, an old wall house built piece by piece over more than 40 years is less that $100.

    The new municipal tax is more that $400

    I honestly think that our government is conspiring with others to drive ordinary Bajans out of Barbados..

    Maybe other people covet our country..

    Maybe some people think that Barbados is too good for poor black people.

    Although Barbados wasn’t too good for us, our parents, grandparents, and fore-parents when we labored as slaves and labored like slaves in the sugar cane fields e in the 35 degree heat and 100% humidity.

    And our government is too foolish to defend what is good for Bajans.


  17. @Bush Tea June 28, 2014 at 6:34 PM “This is the single most stupid tax that has ever been conceptualized by anyone, anywhere…..and it demonstrates why retards should never be entertained in leadership positions.”

    Bushie I tthought that u was a d.

    The muni tax fat to ya?


  18. The muni tax get to you?


  19. Some of the tax bills were received by householders yesterday. The rest of us will get ours on Monday.


  20. Will the coconut vendors and others who leave their spent shells and other garbage for the SSA to collect,have to pay this MSW Tax as well?


  21. […] in the  Municipal Solid Waste Tax Bill, 2014 as, “There shall be charged, levied and … Continue reading →<img alt="" border="0" […]


  22. This is the tip of the iceberg, wait till they get advice from ontario’s mpac then you will know what tax is all about

  23. Hamilton Hill Avatar

    I am inclined to believe that Bush tea is spot on, on point and definitely on the ball in his post timed at 6:34pm. This is just another misstep on the trapeze of blunders created by a circus clown government. Here they are not even able to assure that the present system of garbage collection is done efficiently, yet asking those who could least afford to come out of pocket with more. I say DO NOT PAY A CENT. This is going to be the hottest topic of the next election campaign (just after these mother f—ers qualify for pension) and the incoming set of thieves will reverse this shit tax legislation, on their way to gaining your trust and confidence before they too slide the unlubricated shaft up you know where.

  24. Sunshine Sunny Shine Avatar
    Sunshine Sunny Shine

    Anyone in their right mind who can defend the nonsense of this pathetic bunch of jokers and their continued imposition of hardships are out of touch with reality. All these clowns have done is to show that they are not so much for the poor as they would have you to believe. I mean what part of their policies are catering for the needs of the poor. It behooves me as much as it pains me to say that the BLP were more for the plight of the poor than these pathetic cunts. I doubt if Owen Arthur would have conceived to impose such a tax at this hard juncture knowing that he just laid off thousands of civil servants. The DLP under the Stuart administration are a callous bunch of Johnnies whose arrogance are almost on par with those of some in the BLP camp. If bajans do not wake up soon they will have a crisis for which the only way out might be by the cracking of heads and the pulling of whips. A pressure cooker is only made to take that much pressure and no more.


  25. We should not forget under the Act the MoF has the final authority to waive fees if hardship can proved. Swallow your pride ans submit request, it seems a good use of the MoF’s time. What about government agencies which are not exempt under the Act? What is the point? Will the MoF have to issue a statement in parliament to waive the fee on government entities, he should.


  26. Hamiton Hill

    Stop behaving like spoiled brat. People are taxed all over the world. Who fooled you into believing that Barbados is the exception? Thank God I do not smoke (cigarettes) because there are taxes to be paid on this costly but dangerous habit. (Property taxes) has doubled here within the last two years. (Car taxes) is steadily on the increase and you need not bother to mention (Clothing taxes) these days. And after (Federal and states taxes) are withheld from your salary, you’re left with mere peanuts to pay your remaining bills. These are just a few of the taxes I have pointed to in order to give you an understanding of what some people in the developed world have to deal with. Now, I am not saying that the taxpayers of Barbados do not have a legitimate concern when their express their displeasure with this addition burden. But sometime it is important that one stop and take note of the fact that there are others who are experiencing the very same thing. And finally, these days it seems as though the more you make the more federal, state, and municipal taxes are been withheld. So you have to work with the objective in mind, that If I work a certain amount of hours it goes again me because the government takes it share.


  27. @ David
    http://rt.com/usa/169164-california-bitcoin-bill-signed/
    This report indicates that Jerry Brown, Governor of California, has signed a law legalizing Bitcoin. Until Sinckler gets his head and his fat ass out of the mental cul-de-sac within which he is so firmly located and at least open up some space for creative thinking, nothing will change. Barbados is highly unlucky in having an ‘errand school teacher’ and an average pupil to global finance, at the same time. But the odds were always in favour of this happening and will always be. A teacher who is more familiar with the intrigues of the Greco-Roman period and a boy who has not one iota of creative thinking in any part of his DNA. Within a system dedicated to the centrality of being a bastion for empire. The sin is ckler!


  28. @Hamilton

    On side with your comment. The tax is egregious because it seeks to levy a tax on those who have realized a dream of owning property. One would think it is something any government would want to encourage, property ownership. Also after years of giving tax breaks to Barbadians investing in the Credit Unions to grow the movement the government seeks to suck life from it at a time when the market is bearish.

    @Pacha

    Governments are largely risk averse and you have to admit Bit Coin technology continues to evolve.


  29. There should be nothing sacred about Barbados have ‘one’ economy. The country could open up space for all types of economies to exist. But by the time these national copiers get around to this all the value would have gone elsewhere and, for us, colonialism will persist. Surely, this must be a 2ist century slave society, no?


  30. @David
    California is about the 9th largest economy in the world and it is a government, no?


  31. @Pacha

    A simple initiative which the government can implement which Senator John Watson raised in the Senate recently is facilitating the opportunity for small businesspeople and startups to accept credit card payments via the Internet. This is a basic function which todays business must offer.


  32. @Pacha

    It is also a state that is broke and will take risks.


  33. In today’s Nation newspaper, the head of the IMF is reported to have expressed support for students paying tuition fees for tertiary education. I find her position curious given that she was a former finance minister of France where students do not pay tuition fees and as Simple Simon has pointed out , Bajan students already contribute to university costs by way of the taxes collected from their parents or in the case of mature students from the students themselves. The imposition of fees does NOT come with a reduction in taxes so people are paying twice. Would I be wrong to express skepticism about the intelligence or motive of these people that would wish to “rule” the world? These are the same people who would have advised our Gov’t on the waste tax!


  34. @Pacha

    Let us accept that Stuart is old school and it is difficult to anticipate a government led by him implementing leading edge and innovative initiatives. Under his stuartship we will continue to explore the traditional economic model.


  35. @Ping Pong

    Your position is flawed because it ignores the state of public finances is in deep dodo therefore tax measures are being driven by a revenue grab and NOT any strategic position.


  36. @David
    What is the difference in Barbados? Barbados is a state that is broke also. Even more so than California in its macro-economic abilities. What you fail to understand is that acceptance of Bitcoin does not have to be all consuming. The drug trade represents a certain economy. Is that economy central to the culture? The point is that a national economy is made up of of a multiplicity of micro-economies


  37. @Pacha

    Your point is taken – see BU’s comment 7.59AM.


  38. But David, that is the problem. There are no answers in the traditional model. This is a position which was taken as a given by us. A position we discussed previously. Are we to rehash old understandings every time? Or should we seek to deepen and broaden earlier understandings?


  39. @Pacha

    The majority of the electorate voted for old school which meshes with the conservative psyche of mainstream Barbados. The middleclass has been intoxicated by the good life and it is only in the last 5 years they have started to feel the pinch. It is all about timing of message to collide with an awaking which is on the horizon.


  40. @ David
    You have spoken as though Barbados is the centre of the world. As though event around the world are contingent on the perception of Bajans. This may surprise you but Babados is not central to this writer’s world view. What you are better describing is a level of inbreeding which makes transformation impossible. But the rest of the world gives not a damn about Barbados nor Bajans.


  41. David
    I agree that it is tax grab attitude that drives Gov’t policy BUT I put it to you that it was the lack of proper strategic thinking that got us in this mess and a lack of strategic thinking CANNOT now get us out.


  42. David, I love the way in which you and your trusted group of friends preach your litany of gloom daily. But do you realize that AC is the only person here on BU who brings a counterbalance to your incessant partiality?


  43. Pacha, I am happy that you have informed the thinking of David and those persons who are of the opinion, that Barbados is the luminous crystal in our world.


  44. @Pacha

    Simply painting a reality of what it is like on the ground in Barbados. Agree with you that we need a visionary path to follow which comes with leadership. This going with the flow addresses Ping Pong’s concern as well. We are happy to debate 5% deficit, or 12 weeks forex reserves etc. With good leadership we would have all stakeholders married to key principles for moving us forward. What we have is private vs public sector, Bee vs Dee etc. No wonder no less than the Speaker of the House has come publicly to rubbish the Westminster system.


  45. @ Simple Simon
    Bushie I tthought that u was a d.
    The muni tax get to you?
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Girl you deaf? ….D shiite…!
    Bushie is a B
    …a BBE boy… 🙂

    Bushmen just don’t like shiite…and even for a complete brass bowl who can’t read or understand percentages, this tax is completely IDIOTIC….

    No muni tax can “get to Bushie”…rest assured …small change…
    …besides…no one has a problem with taxes- even high taxes- but IT SHOULD MAKE SENSE……and we should see what we are paying for…
    What pisses the bushman off is how a whole set of DLP jackasses could sit down and let Stuart and Stinkler go ahead with this jobby…

    TAX….but tax with an aim of correcting inbalances…
    TAX….but uses taxes to ENCOURAGE productivity

    …don’t tax land just because these two JAs are such simpletons that this is all they can understand….. Steupsssss

    But here is the real joke Simple S….
    If we had elections tomorrow Bushie would have to vote for Stuart again….cause there is NO WAY a bushman voting for Noel Lynch…

    In short…..we are up shiite street.
    …..unless of course Caswell BUPs….. 🙂


  46. This year my property taxes went over 10,000 can. dollars for a 50 by 100 foot lot so cry me a river. Now it is pretty hard for me to claim hardship if the property is very valuable even though cash flow may not allow me to pay the taxes, the govt will just say sell it….then collect the land transfer tax, the tax on the legal fees and rea lestate costs as well as the new adjusted property tax( usually up ) from the new owner…Barbados will get there soon
    It always pissed me off that I would fix up my home and be taxed more every year or on every improvement and the guy who did nothing to his house just partied and let his home fall apart would pay less for the same lot..
    My advice is to rent ….spend your money on hookers and alcohol don’t be the richest guy in the cemetery.

  47. Hamilton Hill Avatar

    @ Dompey…I am fully cognizant of the fact that I am no match for the intellectual prowess used by you to dispatch the likes of GP and anyone that sought to question the decisions of the government of your choice, but please stop smoking what ever it is that you are since the use of brackets suggest such, for it is effing up your thought process. Make a comparison of the average week’s pay of the barbadian worker and that of one where you are, and then accept the abject folly of your argument. I have noticed that with just one sip and not even a full glass you have repulsed at the acerbity of bush tea. Rethinking your position may help you to realize and benefit from the many intellectual components contained therein. Perhaps then YA WOULD STOP WRITING SO MUCH SHITE.


  48. if it was up to the bushman………b ajans would still be riding in donkey carts on graveled road and collecting water from the stand pipe and using smut lamps….one can easily assumed that this ole gezzer is still living in the 19th century with is assessment of how govt s …should run……no longer can we all live in this big mansion for free ,,the world as we once knew it no longer exist,,,neighbor bowl politics is the thing of the past,,,,,the mythical street of milk and honey ,,was never and will never be ,,,,,,all countries are now owned by big corporations and banks and it is those who we owe and must pay the debt., back in the day when we bought a piece of land they were no two….and three and fourth parties involved,,,now the banks and the govt have become part owners,,so all this belly aching at govt to collect not going to stop the reality of to who we are in debited to ….stop the foolishness reality is at our doorstep , and it is not going away any soon……


  49. BY CASWELL FRANKLYN | SUN, JUNE 29, 2014 – 12:00 AM

    Judging from the number of persons who contacted me to suggest that I write part two, it would appear as though my last column, Lucrative Pensions of MPs, has struck a chord with readers.

    Many persons have asked me to go into more detail, but before I do, I must warn that the pedestals, on which politicians from both major parties have been placed, might become shaky.

    If the manipulation of the pension laws became generally known, it would tend to portray our political leaders since Independence as elitist and self-serving. And it would also give the lie to the party propaganda of caring for the masses that they spout at election time.

    On March 1, 1969, a piece of legislation, entitled the Retiring Allowances (Legislative Service) Act, came into force. It was quickly followed on March 27 by the Pensions (Prime Minister) Act. Those two acts have put in place a regime which ensures that former parliamentarians, who qualify for pensions, would be set for life. Ordinarily MPs qualify, at age 50 years, for a pension after a minimum of eight years’ service. The original legislation made them pensionable at age 55, but a 1989 amendment reduced the qualifying age to 50.

    I must point out that the eight-year minimum and the age restriction do not apply to the Prime Minister. The holder of that office qualifies for a pension of two-thirds of his salary in less than an hour. Section 3 (1) of the Pensions (Prime Minister) Act states, in part:

    “Every person who having been appointed Prime Minister on or after the 30th November 1966, ceases at anytime after such appointment to be Prime Minister shall be paid a pension under this act with effect from the date on which he ceases to be Prime Minister . . .”

    Put simply, a person who demits office at any time after being appointed PM is immediately pensionable and becomes entitled to receive a pension of two-thirds of the highest annual rate of salary. At current rates, a former PM would be entitled to a pension of $11 287.53 per month. However, if he opts for a gratuity and a reduced pension, he would be entitled to receive a tax free gratuity of $423 282.50 and a reduced pension of $8 465.65 per month.

    After the politicians effectively set themselves up for life in 1969, they went about systematically dismantling the pension entitlements of most other public servants. They started with the most vulnerable by amending the Casual Employees Pensions Act to prevent persons who became casual employees after July 1971 from receiving a pension. Hereafter, they were required to rely on National Insurance or make private arrangements for any additional benefits that they may require.

    Also, the retirement age for casual employees was increased from 60 to 65 years, with a provision that existing employees could opt to retire at the later time on condition that service after the workers’ 60th birthday would not be taken into account in computing their pensions.

    After dealing that knockout blow to casual employees, the next assault on the pension entitlements of public workers came in 1975. Government amended the various pensions acts so that workers entering public service employment after September 1, 1975 would continue to be pensionable but that their Government pensions would be reduced by the amount that they receive from NIS. In essence, the people at the bottom of the public sector pay scales would no longer get a pension from the Treasury. And to strengthen my point about being elitist and self-serving, that reduction did not apply to MPs, judges and the Governor-General. The restoration of pensions has remained a matter on the agenda of public sector unions until today.

    In 2008, the hopes of public workers were raised by a Democratic Labour Party election manifesto pledge under the head, Treasuring Our Seniors in their Golden Years.

    It said that a new DLP Government “will repeal the legislation that discriminates between Government pensioners retiring before 1975 and those after in relation to their Government pension and NIS pension”.

    Even though they got the specifics of that promise slightly wrong, I discern a clear intention on the part of the DLP to restore public service pensions to the pre-September 1975 entitlements. Despite that commitment, when it was discovered that the reduction was not applied in relation to employees of some statutory boards, Government moved swiftly to effect the reduction, even though some of the pensioners were in receipt of the pensions for more than ten years.

    So far, all the examples that I have given to show that politicians take care of themselves, without regard to how it looks, have all occurred during DLP administrations. But, I would not like to leave you with the impression that the other side is blameless. In 1978, the Tom Adams administration abolished the contributory pensions that would have benefited the widows and children of deceased public officers, on the basis that NIS made provisions for survivors’ pensions.

    However, in 1985 Tom Adams died, and it was discovered that there was no provision for a widows and children’s pension in the Pensions (Prime Minister) Act. Rather than send his widow to NIS, as Adams had done to other public servants, his former colleagues introduced legislation to provide a non-contributory pension for the PM’s widow and children and gave it retrospective effect. Mind you, the then DLP Opposition supported the bill.

    I can cite many more examples where the “political class” has joined together to take care of each other, (that would be part 3), but the labouring class refuse to join together for their own defence and benefit. When will we learn?

    • Caswell Franklyn is a trade unionist and social commentator.


  50. The sad thing is that the licorish big guts politicians and senators get free food everyday they go to the house of assembly and sometimes you see their pimping yardfowl friends also eating while being imbibed with big mounth drinks at tax payers expense.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading