Submitted by Yardbroom
Prime Minister Freundel Stuart
Prime Minister Freundel Stuart

In arriving at a just determination, when a plethora of evidence must be examined by a properly constituted tribunal,  it is often best to decide first on what can be agreed on.  In the Alexandra issue it is agreed – or appears – that the problems there started before the term of this DLP Government.  However, when elected to government  problems should be solved which you inherited, that is the nature of being elected to govern.  So the problems despite their history must be solved by this administration.

In the first instance  Prime Minister Freundel Stuart stood back and was criticised for so doing.  With a cabinet consisting of Ministers with portfolios in charge of respective departments, they are expected to discharge their responsibilities.  A Prime Minister should not be seen as a dictator, he must allow his ministers an opportunity to make decisions.  When the problem of Alexandra appeared intractable the Prime Minister agreed to meet with BSTU and if the speech made by them after the meeting is to be believed, they were listened to.  In politics being cordially welcomed and politely listened to does not always mean an agreement with your stated position.

The Prime Minister decided having listened to the complex issues involved, to go the route of a Commission Of Inquiry.  Here (On BU) there was “some”  disagreement with this course of action.  However, this decision gave the electorate to whom the Government is ultimately responsible an opportunity to learn first hand of the issues involved and form an impression – on the plausibility of evidence – of the major players giving evidence before the Commission.

Why is Alexandra important?

(a) Most of us have children and like the majority of the Barbados population have been to school.

(b) We have at some time therefore interacted with Heads and teachers.

(c) We want our children to have a rounded education, in an environment that is conducive to learning.

We have an issue which is complex but to which the electorate can “relate.”  It matters not if you support BSTU or Mr. Broomes, the situation at Alexandra could not continue as it was.  It is a teaching establishment, where it is “alleged” the teachers could not co-exist in peace and harmony,when discharging their duties; one has to question what were the core values being taught.  It was finally decided that a cancerous root had taken hold and in order to make a fresh start, drastic action was needed.

The transfers were many but so were the problems.  Can any “reasonable person ” believe that after a meeting with the Prime Minister of Barbados, the findings of a Commission of Inquiry and an order signed on behalf of the Governor General of Barbados we could go back to the “status quo” as if nothing has happened.

There is talk of the transfers being “punitive”, are we expected to believe that after the evidence at the COI the blame lies only with Mr. Broomes and only he should be separated/transferred from Alexandra, would that be justice?  If you accept there is fault on both sides, then both sides should be admonished.  Even if “mitigation” is warranted it does not extend to the point where the impression is that one side has escaped unscathed.

The teachers at Alexandra like “most” teachers in Barbados have the interest of their students at heart and in the main are honest decent people and try with due diligence to do what is best for them.  How then have we arrived at this impasse? It is because they have become entangled in a situation where like snowflakes, they are snared in a snowball rolling downhill at speed, around which is tightly tied a red scarf flailing frantically in an icy wind.

There is also a feeling they must show solidarity with colleagues, some of whom they have known for many years.  If you are not part of an inclusive group; a staff room can be a “lonely place” particularly for those who transgress unwritten rules.  Often some staff members only go there to collect mail or read notices and dread passing through the school gates in the morning and that is not because the task of teaching causes fear.  That is the human aspect of this situation, to them much sympathy is extended.

Alexandra (Greek) feminine form of Alexander a name sometimes given to the Goddess Hera is usually taken to mean: “One who comes to save warriors”.  It would be ironic would it not, if the astute leadership skills demonstrated by Prime Minister Freundel Stuart – you may disagree- has caused she – Alexandra – to come to the aid of a true warrior and so define the outcome of the next Barbados General election.


  1. Hi Observing(…)
    We must always allow the wounded to walk away with a little dignity. . . . magnanimity.
    The lady is “pleased” she has faith in the “integrity of the process”: l wonder if the so called Polls that asked a NON-Question will still be relevant.


  2. Observing / Yardbrrom;
    What was the date of that video clip of Mary redman claiming a potential total victory?


  3. @Check it out
    January 2012 🙂


  4. Observing; Thought so. It supports my recollection of the events then in that the body language and lack of and careful use of words suggested that some definite promises were given to get the BSTU to let the workers go back to work. Wonder if some details of those putative promises may get out during the upcoming campaign?


  5. the video speaks with clarity 1. the objective of separating broomes 2; the teachers getting back to teaching the children of AX. nowwhere does Redman even hints of wanting the teachers removed from AX involve in the madness. she specifically stated her objective of which one was accomplished. however the removal of the teachers was not even one of suggestion on her part in the video.


  6. @ ac

    It is NOT up to Mary Redman to decide if teachers should be transferred or not. She does not have or need to suggest it!!!!
    They do not work for her, she does not pay their salaries. The PM was not put there to do MR’s bidding but to run the country.


  7. pat

    listen pat my answer was to observing hinting that mary got what she wanted refering to the video . except that she did not stated seoaration of teachers which is in question as Mary says was “punitive”, my comment does not suggest that she can make request or recommendations as to where the teachers should be transfered. except in this instance as stated redman contest that the tranfers were “punitive”


  8. @check it out
    Redman knows that it takes a special type of gumption to “cross” a sitting Prime Minister.

    @ac
    I admire your consistency in contributions despite your fluctuations in logic and understanding. I would actually welcome you around my table even though I know you would make sense only 60% of the time. Keep striving for principled position and enjoy being the voice of the minority if ever it falls on you. You have your place and purpose.

    Just observing

  9. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Observing

    You should have said, normally it takes a special type of gumption to cross a sitting PM.

    I would suggest to you that the PM was wounded by eleven of his own people, and because of that he is not being taken seriously by many. If he had dealt with the enemy within, he might have some friends without. If not friends, he would have been respected. He is now reduced to be a roaring toothless lion. Without teeth he is only soring up the country’s nipples.

    Sent from my iPad


  10. observing! well point out where i was wrong in assuming that your perspective of the video was mary got what she wanted. albeit the video was during the time of ths strike where the Pm met with redman to ward off further strike action. i real;ly don’t see the point of your off the cuff comment. it seems that when another observation is brought to the table one gets ” red hot “: under the collar”
    my perspective.


  11. you of all people stated that the resolution was a done deal and mary was without an audience only to be proven wrongcause of on thursday the CPO met with her and at least talks are ongoing.


  12. @caswell
    Agreed. The one sided meeting in January 2012 didn’t help either.

    @ac
    1. I still believe the resolution is a done deal
    2. I always believed that redman deserved a meeting with the cpo
    3. The point of the video was that feeling productive after a meeting means nothing
    4. I walk around naked or in a towel most of the time so that my collar doesn’t get hot.

    Sleep tight 😉

    Observing


  13. observing ! so what is the purpose of the meeting if as you said the resolution is a done deal.


  14. @ac
    Time will tell. Redman isn’t one to keep quiet for too long. But rest assured, what’s done is done.

    Observing


  15. @ac

    We have discussed this many times before: the BSTU is a recognized trade union who will have to interact with the very same stakeholders (MOE,CPO,etc) in the process on future occasions. The nature of negotiation is built on relationships, conventions etc necessitate that the BSTU be allowed to exit this AX matter with a little dignity intact. It is part of massaging the IR beast.


  16. this is my final take on this ongoing saga .however aspreviuosly stated

    ac | January 18, 2013 at 6:29 AM

    i suspect the talks were cordial with much needed greivances given preference no promises were made. however i believe that in the coming months going into new school year that some teachers which BSTU said was punished would be transfered from the schools at which they are required to teach in preference of schools to their liking and criteria .This might be further down or perodically done in less hostile and aggravted conditions away from public glare and suspicions..

    |

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading