Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

On 22 March 2012 the issue of David Weekes’ quest to procure A Request For Copies Of The Instruments Of Ratification [Caricom] was highlighted. In the period since there has been an interesting development.

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

The United Nations

The Secretary General

Mr. Ban Ki-moon

Your Excellency,

I was awake this morning from 2 a.m. I am here in my home like Annie Frank, watching and waiting, for SS like parties draped in black, hiding their faces, because, last night, the 3rd of April 2012, at a few minutes after 2 a.m. two attempts to firebomb my home, failed. (See the attached pictures)

I have become like a modern day Thomas Beckett, a thorn in the side of these Colossi, one whom they now conspire to extinguish. The full details of this disgraceful firebombing have been, and continue to be, published under separate cover in various news media.

One year ago, I wrote an email to the Leaders of Government of CARICOM Member States titled “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing” imploring these “honourable men” for assistance in my litigation against the CARICOM Secretariat, a lawsuit that has been waging for 5 years, and one through which I been made to suffer some serious economic hardships and incurred some niggling health issues.

Last week, two national newspapers featured full page editorials on my plight and laid out the distasteful facts of how, while I have had my substantive court case delayed, dogged by the delay tactics of CARICOM’s legal counsel Carrington and Sealy, the same legal firm has incredibly, been able to get a judgment against me, personally.

Ironically this judgment is for Central Bank Guaranteed monies which my company, IBIS Latin America Corp, used to fund the software, and very patent, that I purport CARICOM has used, has yet to pay me for, and now do verily claim “Immunity from Prosecution”. That judgment and my “impecuniary” position have resulted in the April 18th 2012 auction of my home.

That these two full page articles detailing my CARICOM plight offended someone enough to have them firebomb me, may for many be deemed speculative Secretary General, but, for me, this is a very real and present danger.

I am the home owner being terrorized the one who, for 365 days a year, for the last 10 years, has lived with my daughter on a cul-de-sac with only 3 houses. The two other houses on my street are owned by UK citizens that only visit for 1-2 months a year!

I am sure that these bombings, were not “a prank by young men”.

Any astute reader should ask themselves why, would persons unknown, travel to a remote cul de sac in the north of my island, to fire bomb a house with two, rather sophisticated IED devices?

The fact is that, 24 hours later, I, David Weekes, plaintiff in the lawsuit against the CARICOM Secretariat, after two newspapers publish this travesty to an entire nation, now lie “under siege” in my Barbadian home, one which on April 18th will be auctioned to satisfy an unconscionable judgment I spoke to previously.

Secretary General Ban, I have no one to turn to, nor nowhere to go. Honourable men have abandoned me and I am being hunted down much like a rabid dog in this land, one where my national anthem, in meaningless and empty rhyme, speaks of “these fields and hills beyond recall are now our very own”

Haile Selasie’s words resonate with me now more than ever and I urge you to hold them in your mind as you read this my plea, “Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.”

To you, Secretary General, having exhausted all local and regional recourse in this matter, I would ask your urgent attention and assistance. I am mindful of the words of infinitely wiser historians that the Killing Fields of this world, and the Auswitsches of recent times begin with little incidences of liberty denied and I would say these words to fellow Bajans.

“First they came for the communists, and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist, Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.”

I just want what is guaranteed to every denizen under GOD’s sun, and what is echoed under the UN Declaration of Human Rights – my right to due process and commensurately my day in the law courts.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

86 responses to “Will No One Rid Me Of The Meddlesome Priest?”


  1. David, this matter is a serious cause for concern, especially so because I am presently preparing a lawsuit to redress a similar situation. If it is possible I should like to get in touch with the person who is affected.


  2. And just imagine Barbados was today given praise for its human rights record.

  3. Observing (and learning) Avatar
    Observing (and learning)

    ya mean just so???


  4. @ David

    Is there anything on the background to this?


  5. Something smells here. A lot more details are needed for this story. Why would a legal quest to right the wrongs done to him elicit such an extreme response? If true, this is a new type of rascality in high places in Barbados. The Police need to act on this quickly and bring the culprits to justice.

  6. Smooth Chocolate Avatar
    Smooth Chocolate

    @david weekes
    i am hoping anxiously that this is resolved soon in ur favour. i have found to be a really, really patient man (remembering my days when u taught me). unfortunately we live in an island where lawyers are a corrupt as they come. i just hope that the AG will be different from the lot is see parading this island


  7. This is very unfortunate. Wondering what police investigations will reveal? Last night at about 8 p.m. as I was on my way from UN House attending a meeting with the UN Commissioner on Human Rights who is visiting Barbados, I got this news.


  8. @ ROK

    I’m sorry… I don’t know you…but since you attended the meeting you mention can you confirm that Raul Garcia’s case is under UN scrutiny?


  9. @robert ross: The meeting was about Barbados where several NGOs, institutions and members of the justice system briefed the Commissioner on the state of human rights in Barbados.


  10. This MAN is my friend. Thank you David


  11. @ ROK
    Thankyou.
    Does that mean she was briefed on Raul Garcia?


  12. @ BAF
    Smile and wave.
    And – sincerely – thankyou for saying what you just said in all senses. For a man to acknowledge his friend openly and humbly is a noble thing. It’s very poignant this week.


  13. Robert you be my friend too … if you weren’t so f#ckin’ civilized ….


  14. @ BAF

    sweet…lol


  15. @robert ross
    No, it did not go into individual cases but more dealt with the laws (adequacy or inadequacy) and policies in place as well as the work of institutions, agencies, organisations to fill the voids.


  16. “The Police need to act on this quickly and bring the culprits to justice.”

    Not pon dis piece of rock! It is a shame that one of our own is being treated in this manner by some powerful individuals. I wonder what would be the outcome if his skin was another COLOUR ? This confirms that there are two types of Barbados.


  17. So how come Leroy Parris and Co homes have not been put up for auction?


  18. The Broad Street Journal quoted “In the email, he claims that while there has not been a judgment in the civil suit he brought against CARICOM, a local law firm has “been able to put my company in court and get a civil judgment, against me, in a personal capacity, not my company, for default on a Central Bank-backed guarantee”.

    I am no legal eagle but I thought that by forming a company a person would not held be liable for the actions of that company.

  19. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Barbados should be held out as a case study of how to appear to be civilized and operate under the rule of law but is everything other than what it appears. There is very little justice if any being dispensed in Barbados. If you are lucky enough to be in the privileged class in this country you can get away with anything even murder. Everyone in authority knows who killed Pele for supplying drugs to his son but we had a bogus commission of enquiry that yielded no tangible results and people were pacified.

    Even criminals have rights, what happens when some petty thief is shot in the back when fleeing the scene of his crime? Everyone comes out and sings the praises of the shooter, not realizing that the thief, by his act of turning and fleeing, was not placing anyone in imminent danger of being killed or injured. But we see no official notice of that being acknowledged when the idiot thief is brought before the court.

    The magistrates’ courts in this country dispense rough justice on a daily basis with semi-literate accused persons being forced to represent themselves against trained prosecutors. At this stage in our development, with so many under-employed lawyers, no one should be forced to represent himself in court because he does not have the means to hire a lawyer. It is high time that we emulate something positive out of the USA for a change, where accused persons are cautioned that they have a right to be silent and told that an attorney would be provided if they cannot afford one. I am sure that Dodds Prison would be almost depleted if most of the persons there had a competent lawyer at trial. But here I am on my soapbox again, sorry Irene.


  20. @Shakaelu

    Yes it is a worrying development to add to an already complicated and distressing problem for Mr. Weekes.

    It is why BU has added its small voice to the cause of seeking to have light where there is darkness.


  21. @ David

    Give everyone a voice I agree but we need to know the full facts before rooting for the perceived underdog in this apparent David and Golith saga.


  22. @All

    I, the meddlesome priest, started guard duty at 2 this morning, my daughter did the first shift and I will not sleep until 8 tonight.

    @shakaelu

    They already know where i live, so i can freely give you my email davidweekes@earthlink.net – disregard the first response from my email spam filter, i will get the mail

    @islandgal246

    That Human Rights record is a sham, none of the Attorney Generals whom i have called have even deigned to respond to me formally as they promised. In fact the last time i was there to collect copies of the now infamous instruments of ratification, one of their senior, after refusing to assist me in my inquiries, threatened to have security throw me out of the AG’s office!

    But while this is par for the course – it seems to be a normal response for persons in the castle of our skin.

    My issues pale in significance (or into insignificance) when set against the young black woman who was shot while walking her baby, in Nelson Street, some years back and who still has a bullet fragment lodged in her head. That bullet, from time to time, blocks some arteries and causes her head to swell as big as a football.

    She unbelievably has been shuffled through more than the 3 AGs I have, while no one has sought to address her matter. To date, she has not had any justice afforded her. I cried because i had no shoes until i met a man who had no feet….

    Dem is not gine to invite we bush hall dwellers, emerton lane, pine and Nelson Street denizens to dem human rights meetings, causing displaying de real state of affairs in Barbadus gine “impact nagatively pud de touriseses”

    Dear Islandgirl246, i have pleaded with no less than 4 justices on that same point of personal liability for what is a company secured loan! The one Justice who recognised the specific issue, while he could not at that point do anything with the process was gracious enough to say that i needed to get a lawyer.

    Now here is the overlap between what you, as a non-legal-eagle, saw so easily and what Casswell F speaks about re legal representation for poor people. Case in point, I pay $1500 and find myself being proctologically explored, (BAF would used more colourful invectives) and later, when you don’t have one cent more in your pockets, having been (purportedly) raped by the bona fide representative of regional interests, i couldn’t afford a lawyer to address the compounded mess that I was in.

    Legal Aid DOES NOT COVER commercial matters.If you dont have money, you are (BAF expletive removed)

    By the way, with all the professional infelicities that abound in my fair BIM, it is time for a “clearing house mechanism” that provides ratings for lawyers, (and all professionals). This platform will permit every (Bajan) user access to public assessments of members of this fraternity, contributed by members of the public and augmented by qualified remarks from other ombudsman entities. By this means potential clients get some insights, BEFORE paying money for a “pig in a poke”.

    i would respectfully suggest that is is time for a tailored, indigenous Better Business Bureau which provides specific info on various professionals and, in the case where litigation or complaints have been investigated, (and the facts definitively show that the lawyer/doctor/mechanic is for example not a mechanic, a poor mechanic, a fly by night lawyer or a witch doctor), that platform will PUBLISH IT.

    Maybe Ms. Griffith at the Fair Trading Commission or some similar agency could approach the Embassy of the United States or the Canadian government and see how a technical assistance programme could be used to develop a local equivalent for a BBB a la Barbados.

    In extrapolating on certain of the novel and exciting thoughts posited by Justice Marston, mayhap, in streamlining the judicial system and/or making its stakeholders efficient and accountable, the InterAmericam Development Bank having funded the Judicial Centre etc. could be contacted by the Barbados Bar Association or similar watchdog organisation to provide funding for this Consumer Repository Ombudsman System (CROS).

    CROS would seek, among other things, to police the legal system in a transparent and easily accessible fashion, weed out the bad apples and let the good ones thrive.

    I would be prepared to make my patent pending schema for CROS available for that sector.

    @ Casswell Franklyn

    During a murder case convened on Parkinson pasture a young black man was purported to pass and fold his fingers like a gun and say the words “fire
    pun ya” to a resident who was giving evidence, a bench warrant purportedly was issued for his arrest. Nuh QCs en went to de defense of that misguided young “enthusiast (now jailbird) from de Pine” Flash back to UWI students blocking the UWI private road a few years back, remember when the huge police officer got his undershirt ripped from under his tunic, pun national TV? You remember how many QCs run up deah? one law for the Medes and another for the Persians.

    @Robert Ross

    Your advice per calling the BBA was not as useful as i thought it would be. The Disciplinary Committee section which i still need to contact (re my matter of paying $1500 to a lawyer and being shafted) does not operated all week as you stated. Re the second bit of advice – The Chairman’s Secretary berated me for calling to speak to him and invoked the name of Jesus the Christ during my call. Mr. Pilgrim was off island but his Deputy Ms. Weekes/Weeks (not sure which one is right because the BBA has both spellings for the same person), was most gracious and helpful. It was she who explained the fact that the BBA IS NOT the Disciplinary Committee, they are completely separate entities even though the latter is an organ within the BBA. Ensuingly the number that you provided is technically incorrect when one is pursuing actions of a disciplinary nature.

    @ROK

    Ty, I would have loved to have been at this UNHRC session, unfortunately i doan get invite to nuh more big up tings causing i does put my feet pun de people funiture en ting en does hole muh belly en laff de poor man laugh, besiding i does carry home de people cutlery en ting. But seriously I represent a glaring embarrassment to the purported civilities, sterling democracy and stolid judicial institutions that are touted to exist in Barbados, so i am not invited anywhere. Why only recently the CEO of the Fair trading Commission left me standing for 42 minutes and refused to let me speak at Justice Marston’s lecture!

    How long is the Commissioner here? I would love to get in contact with her. Maybe she can tell me what i can do per my rights on due process, because the AG of Barbados can’t (I almost said won’t but that would impute volition to a functionary who some tell me will only be in office up to January 2013). .

    Finally, in reading my errant comments, boring litany/remarks about justice delayed, my advertising plug for use of another of my patents etc. (Lord dat man Weekes en learn nuffing from dis CARICOM ting), I would wish all of you to bear i mind that I too bemoan the many problems in my dear BIM.

    Many of these I have the “lightning pole” misfortune to be a target of, but you will note that, commensurate with any pronouncement of any problem, I make it my bounden duty to proffer a solution to the problem.

    (1) for my issue with CARICOM, give me a competent justice and a day in court
    (2) for those lawyers, doctors and other professionals (of which you are not one) create a BBB like platform and allow the public to rate the practioners, and publish the names of the ones that there are official sanctions/judgements for for the indifference of political representatives, unresponsive ministers, i recommend two things,

    (1) Jan 2013, causing it en going happen nuh sooner dan when all de oblongabouts dun finish en de Hansel en Gretel painted houses dun build and
    (2) dat we Bajans demand dat the representatives dat get bring to we doan jus be DJs pud de Redifusion, nor boxing promoters, nor ministers of sidewalks but men or women wid common sense. Mek dem accountable to we, mek dem promise we to make de power of recall a reality en when dem do foolishness, recall dem to de community dat dey does abandon till general elections get call every five years

    My 2 – 7.30 shift over at my house, now i have to be vigilant on the streets.


  23. @ ROK

    Thankyou..so the discussions were probing or merely camauflage, public relations window-dressing?


  24. @ David Weekes

    I think you were ‘Blogger’ or ???

    If so, I think you had said that you could never make contact with the BBA, that it was always closed. Well, seems you’re right this week. But, yes, that is the number I gave you. The Disciplinary Committee, which is composed (apart from the Registrar) of members of the BA operates from the BBA office. It seems to be doing so as a Committee this week, or was. When I called earlier in the week, the person who answered the phone was in fact a Disciplinary Committee person. It was she who told me the BA office was otherwise closed this week. But the DC does not seem to have a separate phone number. Since the ‘Committee’ only operates as a committee from time to time, obviously its members are scattered and unless one of them is actually there when you phone, then there’s no-one you can speak to other than the BA secretary lady. But I guess she could have taken a message.

    On your Pilgrim experience – I hope I wasn’t the cause of that. I did rather ‘bring it on’ with someone in his office after the same fella failed to return calls. I said something about that in one of the posts – saying something to the effect that they’re all in the business (the CJ down) of not observing the standard etiquette. So I hope you didn’t get the fall-out from that. Maybe they were all very sensitive (!). But at least you found a nice lady who wasn’t. My experience with the BA is that after a number of phone calls from me they’re closing ranks – to the point of asking me why I’m bothering to raise questions.


  25. @ David

    Are you speaking to me?

    I asked above whether there was any background material – apart from the earlier post of course. A Jack X has raised the same point from a slightly different perspective. Perhaps DW will supply. I ask simply because, for me at any rate, I want to understand his present predicament – and that will only come if the nature and origin and history of his legal dispute is explained….in order to understand ‘where he is NOW’.


  26. @robert

    The comment can be taken as BU’s position on how we intend to treat with this matter until otherwise persuaded.


  27. @ David

    Far be it from me to try to persuade……..err……

    But yes, I understand…which IS more than ‘I hear….’


  28. @ David Weekes

    Sorry, yes it was you as David W. But the point you made about opening hours was of the BA not the DP.


  29. @ Caswell

    But stay on that soapbox. Neva mind Irene – who? We don’t have a public defender system and maybe we should. I know that some enterprising young attorneys, recently Called, with nothing else to do regularly visit District ‘A’ to see if anyone needs help. One I’m thinking of managed to help twice in this way. Apparently one of those she helped was a druggie who said: “When I get out, I will pay you.” The attorney laughed and said something about Black Rock. So you see, some of them do try and, in their little way, make a little difference. And that’s nice.

  30. chocolate city hussle Avatar
    chocolate city hussle

    @ Jack X | April 5, 2012 at 7:35 AM |
    “Give everyone a voice I agree but we need to know the full facts before rooting for the perceived underdog in this apparent David and Golith saga.”

    IF U had listen to the Attorney General just before World cup cricket 2007, u would have known the facts. if u had read Business Authority last week, u would have known the facts. if u would read the correspondences between David Weekes and CARICOM, U would have known the facts.

    stop trying to assume something that is not there. it is obvious that u have just read responses and come to ur stupid statement.. respond to something else that u are familiar with but stay out of this, if u are not familiar with what is going on


  31. @ Chocolate City

    No – that wont do. It is because there are only responses – at least in essence – that there is a thirst for something more. IF, as it were, it’s ‘none of our business’ this should never have been posted. I don’t think you’re actually saying that, but it is the implication.

    Whatever the background, the rights, wrongs and all the rest, there is clearly no justification for any intrusion into David’s domestic situation or to his person….and if this IS what happened it is despicable. ‘A Jack X’ was issuing a note of caution, nothing more sinister I think.


  32. @robert

    You are correct, let us hope the public noise will coax a response.


  33. @David

    It is only fair, and reasonable, that as was suggested in various commentary all should have an informed perspective on this issue so i now have provide the following documents of public record

    (a) my affidavit to the court – https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B0Hc4MFCmayjQllaMk80T29Rd09yVmJ0ZnRpWVlEQQ and

    (b) the response from the Caricom Secretary General. see https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B0Hc4MFCmayjS3pLMHh4UnJTcGVQdEFjRVU1U3FWZw

    Ours is a long document but it should provide some background and context to that which I, to use the words of the SG, verily affirm.


  34. The HR Commissioner has spoken. Raul’s continued incarceration is illegal. Release him. ALLELUIA.


  35. @ Robert Ross

    “I think you were ‘Blogger’ or ???”

    I am David Weekes, i never have, or will, use a pseudonym, or handle, to hide my identity, in the real world or here in cyberspace.

    People who do such fear death, ridicule, victimization or dishonour.

    The latter is of no concern of mine because, among my friends, i never will lose my honour.

    Victimization, well this CARICOM issue speaks to that issue eloquently.

    Ridicule, don’t really know what that word means, i am slothful of thought, deficient in language and challenged by definition.

    And death well, first i caution the firebombers and their masters “if it bleeds it can die”. Take heed of this Canute-like instruction “come no farther” because if you come within range…

    I have been on the doorstep of the latter many times and I too “find it most strange that men, should fear death, seeing that it, a necessary end, will come when it will come”..

    No Mr. Ross, do not mistake me with some other cyber dweller who will hide in the shadows of acronyms or fanciful handles.


  36. ONE LAW FOR THE MEDES AND ANOTHER FOR THE PERSIANS (CONTINUED)

    I went down to the courts this morning wearing an African dashiki top from Sierra Leone and a pants.

    Three black female government security Guards refused to let me pass the security scanners and insisted that i put my African Dashiki shirt into my pants!

    Well in all of my years on this planet i have never heard of a shirt jack being worn inside a pants so when they insisted that i do so, i refused and left the court building.

    Yes it would appear like if i am a lightning rod for these things but i would ask you legal luminaries a question about this “dress code” at the Judicial Centre.

    I remained in the foyer area in front of the court for several minutes just watch and waiting to see if any other male with a dashiki came in the court and while no men were similarly frocked a few women came with african blouses, OUTSIDE THEIR SKIRTS!.

    I would ask you legal luminaries to comment on this vacillating dress code and its seeming discriminatory components against the renown case of the Attorney General Minister of Education and Wiltshire versus Jones.

    The women who wore similar dashikis were permitted to enter the court building WITHOUT it being necessary to push said item into their skirts.

    I wanted to ask you gents if it would be discriminatory if i were to put on said same female dashiki next week Tuesday and wear it into the court building if besides attracting the attention of ***, and mindful of the “sometimish” dress code policy of the Government Security Guards, they would be discriminating against me if they insisted that i put the dashiki in my pants?

    The same three guards allowed those two women through the court security portal. Neither of them was stopped and they did not call the policeman to either of them and insist that they push said dashiki blouses into their skirts and they did with me and my pants.

    I am sure that if i had insisted and passed into the vestibule that i would be in Central Police Station all like now.for what is simple discrimination.

    I wonder if Ralph Boyce from MESA or Nalita Gajagdar would feel inclined to comment on this insignificant thing?

    Who decides this dress code thingy? It is not as if one is dishevelled or unkempt. Can someone please tell these illiterate people what a dashiki is?

  37. Smooth Chocolate Avatar
    Smooth Chocolate

    those security guards are a bundle of retards. they do not know how to interpret their instruction. they are bafoons when it comes to the grey areas, little wonder……. if they are told that 2 colours exist, black and white. when they are presented with the colour grey, their brains somehow is unable to analyse it

  38. Smooth Chocolate Avatar
    Smooth Chocolate

    correction

    “their brains somehow are unable to analyse it”


  39. @ David Weekes

    LOL. stay cool. I really couldn’t remember; but see I checked and corrected.

    On clothing: oh yes….I’ve had and witnessed exactly the same experiences as you – and it is VERY irritating I agree. I usually do as they ask and when I get in the lift pull out the shirt again and leave it like that. I’ve never been stopped on leaving. The ‘illness’ is suffered by both male and female guards.
    Mind – this kind of nonsense is rooted in other places. A few months back, I went to District A on a saturday morning (btw – where ARE the loos in that place?). Most of the attorneys present looked as if they’d not long got out of bed; ditto the magistrate – all, bar one, were in ‘civvies’ including jeans and flip-flops. I spoke confidentially with a young lawyer, who was dressed in the standard, week-day, ‘lawyer-wear’, on one of the public benches and put my elbow on the back rest of the bench to speak into her left ear. As we spoke, a court official intruded and told me to remove my elbow. I blinked, said “what?” and then was advised by (nice) Ms Lawyer that I’d better remove the offending elbow.

    I’m sure the moral of the story, and yours David, is that in this society we pay too much regard to what appears as, or passes as, form and virtually nothing to substance; and nowhere is this more true than in the inscrutable idiocies that are perpetrated in this same District A in the name of ‘justice’ in the matter of bail applications. In short: we are a nation of Pharisees squinting about and busily going nowhere very much.The free underground presses are a wonderful antidote to that – in the sense that here ‘regulation’ means self-regulation and if David ‘reproves’ it is with a nod and a wink not with jack-boots. Actually, he’s a total softee. Even Zoe has survived the third-strike ‘rule’.


  40. @David Weekes

    Was it deliberate that items listed on an Appendix mentioned in your Affidavit are not posted?

    The meeting held at the Hilton, it is interesting that Senator Phillip Goddard functioning as Special Envoy of the Government of Barbados was not named or pursued in any action?

    What was the reason given by Alair Shepherd and co?


  41. @David

    Yes it was a deliberate act not to post the Exhibits.

    When i made the platform i was mindful of creating a solution that, barring the technological impossibility of knowing what is in the heart of a man or woman travelling on a vessel/plane, (one who is intent on blowing it up or bringing it down from the sky), I sought to provide inviolable means where all “non-desirables” would be filtered out BEFORE embarking on a vessel where my family, your son, daughter, mother etc would be put at risk.

    The system was extremely detailed, down to monitoring personnel like cleaning staff who now move unfettered through our own Grantley Adams airport because they have, of all things, a mop bucket!

    The exhibits contain various observations and recommendations that the said non-desirables could still use to subvert the travel cycle, for several immigration processes that still exist in Caribbean ports and some that still obtain in international jurisdictions.

    Even today, my patent, crafted roughly 10 years ago, still remains pertinent and provides certain “insights” that the criminal element would benefit from.

    Consequently, I would not be sticking to the belief, spirit and intent of the patent if i divulged information which persons of less than spartan intentions could use to compromise travel at 2012.

    You ask some really interesting questions which, less i offend others, and you know what my recent remarks in the news have elicited, i perforce will answer your question with a hypothetical construct, sine defamation nuances.

    The final court of appeal for CARICOM is the CCJ, that for 3M, situate as their subsidiary is in Trinidad, is the Privy counsel in the UK.

    Why, if one is cognisant of this construct, would one enjoin 3M in a Barbadian court?

    But such is hypothetical situation proposed by “one who is slothful of thought” and lwe all know that lesser folk and people of my ilk cannot ascend to these mounts Zion, or Olympian and I dare not look upon the faces f these beings luminary and ecclesiastical, lest I either turn to stone or are made mad by such omniscience.

    Maybe that answers your two questions.

    You are not a lesser mortal are you David? I am quite new to the BU but, by the “timbre” of your queries, i discern that you are “steeped in the craft” .


  42. @David Weekes

    The strategy is understood.


  43. @David Weekes…..I wonder if the security guards would make a Muslim man tuck in his shirt and take off his hat?

  44. Random Thoughts Avatar
    Random Thoughts

    i’ve been refused entrance to the Court because I was wearing a skirt 3 or 4 inches below my knees, and a sleeveless blouse. I am by nature a modest dresser, but on very hot days I wear sleeveless dresses or blouses, properly cut and which do not expose any breast tissue.

    Still a big belly policeman told me “you can’t come in here like that” The way he said it you would have though I had just come form soliciting at the Garrison.

    I should add that I am >50, older that the Chief Justice, older that most judges, and practising lawyers and way way old enough to be the policeman’s mother. I am not what anybody would call sexy looking.

    Still when I dressed appropriately for our Barbados weather the policeman “threw me out of the court”

  45. Random Thoughts Avatar
    Random Thoughts

    David Weekes I would say follow the money. You have to ask who stands to gain by “discomfiting” you.

    Than you will know the identity of the fire bomber or his master.

  46. Random Thoughts Avatar
    Random Thoughts

    Dear Caswell:

    Who killed Pele?

    And did the drug using son continue to use drugs or has he reformed?

  47. Random Thoughts Avatar
    Random Thoughts

    Dear David:

    Maybe next time you go to court you should dress in white cotton 3/4 pants, white loose cotton shirt, white little hat and sandals.

    Or maybe you can wear the same but in pink (just for bare sport)

    I bet there are no rules which say a man pink loose cotton clothing. Confuse the guards and those who sent them.


  48. It is fair to say that the use of an incendiary device as described here is alien to the Barbados landscape?


  49. Random Thoughts wrote “I am not what anybody would call sexy looking.”

    Sexy looking is in the eye of the beholder.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading