Black Historical Revisionists Losing Credibility

Submitted by Charles Knighton

 

Click image to read about the Fertile Crescent

Mr. Rahim Shabazz needs to be made aware that citing a patently false “fact” casts doubt on any other assertion he makes. In his August 7th Editorial letter he claims “Africans in the Nile Valley had domesticated vegetables, grains and other crops 7,000 years before any other civilization.”

I find it increasingly difficult to assign any credibility to Black historical revisionists who seemingly will not be satisfied until every major advance in early human history is rooted in Africa, true or not. What began as a justifiable crusade to make the world aware of actual African achievements by Black people proud of their heritage has increasingly fallen under the spell of agenda-driven propagandists and provocateurs who have yet to learn the lesson that material falsehoods professed as truth will eventually destroy what was originally a good cause.

As I understand it, the retreat of the last Ice Age (from c. 13,000—c.10,000 BCE) released huge amounts of water in many parts of the world and produced climate changes, such as plentiful and regular rainfall, which helped make desert land more fertile. Before long, people learned how to domesticate animals and farm fields. This major advance in people’s control over their food resources occurred very rapidly in what we now refer to as the Fertile Crescent, a region stretching from Anatolia (Turkey) across the eastern Mediterranean coast and Mesopotamia (Iraq) to the Zagros Mountains in Persia (Iran). In about 10,000 BCE hunter-gatherers found that if they planted cereal seeds in watered fields, they would grow into new cereal crops the next year.

The earliest farms began to appear in western Asia in about 9,000 BCE. Farmers also learned how to select wild animals and breed them in captivity to give birth to more domestic types. The farmers learned to store food, and this meant they no longer needed to move regularly to keep themselves and their families clothed and fed. Within 1,000 years small farming settlements had grown into larger ones, and the first seeds of civilization began to emerge.

If Mr. Shabazz or anyone else is able to produce reliable archaeological/scientific evidence that any similar development occurred in the Nile Valley 7,000 years previous to this, or for that matter any time previous to about 10,000 BCE, then please excuse my obvious ignorance. If not, then perhaps a little research of world history is in order—there is plenty to know.

25 thoughts on “Black Historical Revisionists Losing Credibility


  1. Are you the same person who wrote a few weeks ago basically saying that Black people should only be interested in their history from the point of slavery? And accusing persons of wanting to learn otherwise of reverse racism?
    Isn’t that engaging in some ‘revisionism’ of your own? If you indeed are the same person, then to me that sounds like you might have a few “agendas/ulterior motives” of your own.

    Who exactly is Rahim Shabazz? Is he a professional historian? Is he an Egyptologist? Is he an archaeologist? Do you actually even READ and STUDY any black or African professional historians and Egyptologists at all, who have actual expertise in the areas you are writing about? Can you name even one – sans Google of course? Can you name any of their books? Have you ever attended any of their lectures?
    Or do you only choose to read and reference obscure, amateur letter writers and the like who, although perhaps well-meaning, never come with factual evidence to support their claims?
    If yes, then what does that say about YOU?


  2. Also, according to you: “The earliest farms began to appear in western Asia in about 9,000 BCE.”
    However, do remember that some scholars (and not just the black ones as you would have us all think) do in fact believe that farming began in the Nile Valley, owing to the recent Isnan discoveries dated to
    around 13,000 to 10,500 B.C.

    New discoveries are being made all the time. It must be hard for you to keep up to date, however, just because you may be ignorant of, or deliberately callous towards, the latest theories and investigations coming out of Europe and the US, please don’t assume that this means the ‘Black Revisionists’ are too.

    Right now I am too concerned about London and my family and friends’ safety. But I might come back to this at a later date. Good night.


  3. @ CHARLES KNIGHTON.
    Africa: Human Evolution

    ” The earliest known evidence anywhere in the world of the existence of man and the appearance of human civilization comes from Africa: the cradle of civilization and the origin of human society.”
    http://www.thinkquest.org.
    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
    Africa cradle of humankind, study shows
    Ian Sample
    The Guardian, Thursday 19 July 2007.

    ” Modern humans took their first steps to colonise the world from a single region of sub-Saharan Africa, according to British scientists . Many scientists have long thought humankind emerged from the continent some 56,000 years ago, before spreading northwards and establishing Stone Age cultures across Asia, Europe and Australia. …”

    ” Andrea Manica and Bill Amos at Cambridge University used a combination of genetics and skull measurements to show modern humans could not have emerged in different places, but instead came from one region of southern central Africa.

    The researchers examined genetic diversity in 53 human populations across the world and found that the further those populations were from Africa the less varied their genetic make-up. The smooth fall in genetic diversity away from Africa suggests smaller groups of humans spread out from a single area.”
    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………


  4. Nubian Monarchy Called Oldest
    By Boyce Renseberger
    ” Evidence of the oldest recognizable monarchy in human history, preceding the rise of the earliest Egyptian kings by several generations, has been discovered in artifacts from ancient Nubia in Africa.”

    The Contents of the New York Times, March 1, 1979 article that appeared on pages 1 & A16; refered to by Dr. Yosef A.A. ben-Jochannan’s paper on George G.M. James


  5. The human race is of African origin. The oldest known skeletal remains of anatomically modern humans (or homo sapiens) were excavated at sites in East Africa. Human remains were discovered at Omo in Ethiopia that were dated at 195,000 years old, the oldest known in the world.
    (source: Journal of Nature ,February 2005 ).
    …………………………………………………………………………………….
    The First Europeans were not Caucasian :
    The first modern humans that inhabited Europe were not white people , instead there were the Khoisan / San people who originated in Africa .These people created much of the early civilization of Eurasia.

    There have been numerous “Negroid skeletons” found in Europe. Marcellin Boule and Henri Vallois, in Fossil Man, provide an entire chapter on the Africans/Negroes of Europe, Cheikh Anta Diop also discussed the Negroes of Europe in Civilization or Barbarism, pp.25-68. Also W.E. B. DuBois, discussed these Negroes in the The World and Africa, pp.86-89. DuBois noted that “There was once a an “uninterrupted belt’ of Negro culture from Central Europe to South Africa” (p.88).

    Boule and Vallois, note that “To sum up, in the most ancient skeletons from the Grotte des Enfants we have a human type which is readily comparable to modern types and especially to the Negritic or Negroid type” (p.289). They continue, “Two Neolithic individuals from Chamblandes in Switzerland are Negroid not only as regards their skulls but also in the proportions of their limbs. Several Ligurian and Lombard tombs of the Metal Ages have also yielded evidences of a Negroid element.
    …………………………………………………………………………………………


  6. @ Charles Knighton.
    The first inhabitants of Europe
    The first Modern Human to enter Europe, at about 45,000 B.C. was the Khoisan type African, commonly called “Grimaldi Man.

    Cheikh Anta Diop, “The Grimaldi Negroids have left their numerous traces all
    over Europe and Asia, from the Iberian Peninsula to Lake Baykal in Siberia,
    passing through France, Austria, the Crimea, and the Basin of Don, etc. In
    these last two regions, the late Soviet Professor ikhail Gerasimov, a scholar
    of rare objectivity, identified the Negroid type from skulls found in the Middle
    Mousterian period.”

    Historian J. A. Rogers compares the ancient Grimaldi women to the Hottentot,
    South African people who are very closely related to the Bushmen (Koi tribe).”
    He also says that the Hottentot and Grimaldi women had huge amounts of fat
    on their buttocks and their breasts were very large. “This trait is most
    apparent in the Venus of Willendorf, a Grimaldi woman, and the most ancient
    sculpture of the human yet discovered.” Anthropologist Alfred Haddon says
    that the Grimaldis were part of several migrations of African people who
    arrived in Europe.

    Historian J. A. Rogers compares the ancient Grimaldi women to the Hottentot,
    South African people who are very closely related to the Bushmen (Koi tribe).”
    He also says that the Hottentot and Grimaldi women had huge amounts of fat
    on their buttocks and their breasts were very large. “This trait is most
    apparent in the Venus of Willendorf, a Grimaldi woman, and the most ancient
    sculpture of the human yet discovered.” Anthropologist Alfred Haddon says
    that the Grimaldis were part of several migrations of African people who
    arrived in Europe.


  7. ”Africans in the Nile valley had domesticated vegetables, grains and other crops 7 000 years before any other civilization.”-Mr. Rahim Shabazz .

    “The earliest farms began to appear in western Asia in about 9,000 BCE…”
    -Charles Knighton.

    Dr Charles Nelson of the University of Massachusetts states that animal domestication occured in Kenya 15000 yr ago; and that agricultural sites have been carbon dated in Egypt to 18000 B.C.


  8. Black African Nobility in Europe :
    The true racial composition of Europe has
    been presented to us as a White continent so that we do not know
    that Africans were the rulers of Europe and it was through inter-marriage that White people penetrated the
    Black aristocracy until the 1841 when the aristocracy became whitened and decided to partition and colonize Africa.

    It is time to re-examine all the images we have been shown in our textbooks and claim our heritage which included
    Europe. In ancient times, Europe was practically Northern Africa, because military and scientific knowledge was
    controlled by Africans called Moors (pre-Christian and later Christian and Muslim)
    It was Africans who introduced Christianity into Europe and converted the arriving white Europeans to a Black Mary
    and a Black Jesus.


  9. Blue Blood is Black Blood” (1500-1789) by Egmond Codfried :
    ….. The point is that somehow Black and coloured people were present in Europe and managed to keep their Black looks through intermarriage till at least the 17 century.

    I suggest we look at the Moor in European Art and take it from there. In European Art the Moor is always a Classical African: pitch black, frizzled hair, a flat and wide face, flat nosed, thick lips, and subnasal prognasty.

    When you study the symbol of the Moor from The Renaissance (1500) you will find that it did not start out like a Black Servant or a Black Page. The Drake Jewel (1575) shows the profile of a Black King dominating the profile of a White woman. This symbolises Africa dominating Europe and Black superiority in Europe.

    …. Inside The Drake Jewel is a miniature of Queen Elizabeth I. Her father’s sister Mary Tudor was the grandmother of Mary of Scots. Mary of Scots son was James I who married Anne of Denmark. They were the grandparents of Charles II Stuart who was named “The Black Boy.”

    He was described on a wanted poster issued by parliament as a tall Black man and I do not think they were fooling around.

    Anne of Denmark had ordered a play “The Masque of Blackness” (1605) in praise of Black beauty which did not fade. The play was performed by members of the court and it explained how Blacks, The Sun People, came to Europe to look for a milder sun. In the play was a personage of The Niger River. The costume design shows a tall Black woman. Strange as this might sound; it took me after all three years to believe my own findings: Anne of Denmark which we know as a blindingly blond woman was almost certainly Black. As the whole Stuart dynasty was Black of skin.

    When one looks for portraits of Charles II Stuart “The Black Boy” one finds many which show a White man, with long black hair and mustachio. But if one persists there are portraits which show black skin. Especially the National Portrait Gallery site shows many portraits of a Black skinned boy and later a Black adult. Still there is a lot of variations, but I have one pitch black portrait which show his classical African treats under a huge afro-like wig.


  10. Blue Blood is Black Blood” (1500-1789) by Egmond Codfried :

    So there were Black Kings in Europe, who somehow traced their origins in Africa and symbolised their Blue blood with the image of a Moor. The portraits which show Blacks as White’s I would explain as propaganda to make them look as the White people they so despotically oppressed. Other white portraits are over painted authentic Black portraits, or whitened copies of these or outright fakes. All European museums show portraits of the European elite, with fake white skin colour. We know that all the European royal families were blood relatives.


  11. Mr Charles Knighton can’t handle the truth.

    Mesopotamia – a tropic or arid tropic civilization linked to tropically adapted peoples

    Greater Mesopotamia (Palestine, Iraq, Syria, southwestern Iran) falls within the Subtropic/Tropic Arid Zone, NOT the cold-climate zones of Europe or Asia.
    The subtropics are the geographical and climatic zone of the Earth immediately north and south of the tropical zone, at latitudes 23.5°N and 23.5°S. The Greater Mesopotamian area is assigned to the subtropics or the arid tropics by modern climatologists. (See: Troll and Pfaffen, 1964. ‘Seasonal patterns of the earth and Thompson, A. (1997) Applied climatology: pg 179 .

    Peoples of the Palestine area, and the Sumerians did NOT look like cold-clime “white Nordics” or Asiatics.
    Modern data shows a wide range with more links to African sub-Saharan elements.
    The Sumerians had a range of physical variation with clear resemblances on some counts to tropical Africans .

    While they were their own variant and not absolutely 100% identical to other tropicals, several excavations and analyses link the Sumerians with tropical African types much more than Europeans in terms of (a) resemblance to Upper Egypt predynastic specimens, (b) dolichocephalic features, and (c) resemblance to tropical peoples of the Western Desert, and (4) similarities of the Mesopotamian U’baid specimens to other tropicals in terms of prognathism, wide noses and other features.

    The Sumerians called themselves “the black headed people.” They had nothing do do with any blond “Nordics”, as shown in their song: “Lament for Urim”

    Quote:
    “Sumerian literature itself refers more often to ‘the Land’ that it does to ‘Sumer’, and to its inhabitants as ‘the black-headed people.’ (Black, Cunningham and Robson, 2006. pg- 1).

    Modern research comparisons of Sumerians with Mediterraneans dismiss any close affinity.
    Osteological remains from “48 local populations from Southern Europe and the Middle East, ranging in time from 3100 B.C. to 200 A.D.,” disconfirms the two regions “as a single interbreeding group of populations. ”
    — (Finkel D. 1978. Spatial and temporal dimensions of Middle Eastern skeletal populations. JR Hum Evo, 7:3. 217-229)

    Conclusion: Tropical peoples did indeed develop advanced civilizations without needing cold-climate “role models”. Mesopotamia is in the Arid tropic (subtropical) zone and developed advanced civilizations long before reputed European or Asiatic cold-climate “leaders”. The peoples who developed these ancient civilizations did NOT look like cold-climate “Nordics” or Eastern Asiatics. Instead, they show a range of variation, including clear resemblance on some counts to other tropically adapted peoples like those of Africa. Scholars who deny these findings are inconsistent – like Coon above. Resemblances between Sumerians and other tropical peoples covers (a) Upper Egyptians, (b) dolichocephalism, (c) high desert Egyptians, and (d) U’baid specimens showing prognathism and other features within the range of tropical variants. The “Mediterranean” alternative to Nordics is similarly debunked by detailed analysis (Finkel 1978, Keita 1992) and modern CatScan data again shows a range falling within tropical variants ((Naomichi Ogihara 2008).


  12. Hofmeyr-Skull Supports the ‘Out of Africa’ Theory

    A human skull discovered over fifty years ago near the town of Hofmeyr, in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa has been dated the skull to 36,000 years ago. This skull provides critical corroboration of genetic evidence indicating that modern humans originated in sub-Saharan Africa and migrated about this time to colonize the Old World. -2007. F. E. Grine et al. Journal Science 315: 226-229.

    ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

    The REAL non-African history of Modern Man, begins when Modern man started his out of Africa (OOA) migrations from Southern Africa some 60,000 years ago. He started a process that would eventually result in Modern man populating every habitable corner of the world. That first migration saw Modern man take a coastal route through Southern Asia, down through Malaysia, and “Islanding Hopping” to Australia. All along the way, leaving behind settlements of people who would populate those areas.

    The second migration (OOA) at about 50,000 years ago, saw at least three groups of Modern Man take an “Inland” route through Southern Asia and up into Northern Asia. One group, eventually founded the Xia and Shang civilizations in China. Another group, migrated to Japan , and another group, that were probably initially Albinos. Today we call these people, who because of admixture, are no longer Albinos “Caucasians’), they migrated to Central Asia. Soon after that time, the Glaciers in Europe started to melt, and “Modern man” in the person of “Grimaldi Man” entered Europe through the Straits of Gibraltar at about 45,000 years ago. There is general consensus in the worlds scientific community that the preceding is accurate to a best “available evidence” certainty.

    All the while, Modern man was also migrating northward “In” Africa. Some of these people found their way to the Nile Valley and founded the Egyptian civilization. Others kept going, and founded the Canaanite civilization in modern Israel/Palestine, the Sumerian civilization in Iraq, the Anatolian civilizations in Turkey, the Elamite civilization in Iran,the Minoan and Mycenaean civilizations in Crete and Greece, and the Etruscan civilization in Italy,and so on.

    “Caucasians” sometime around 2,000 B.C, and for unknown reasons, decided to leave their Central Asian homelands and move West and South. They reached India at about 1,700 B.C, and conquered the Black Dravidians who had created the Indus Valley civilizations there. At about the same time, other groups reached Eastern Europe, where they eventually conquered the Black cultures there.

    At about 1,200 B.C, the Hellenes and Latin’s invaded Southern Europe. The Hellenes conquered the native Pelasgians and Mycenaeans in Greece, while the Latin’s conquered the native Etruscans and Gaul’s in Italy, France, and surrounding areas. After usurping these civilizations, they eventually moved south into Anatolia, the Middle East, and North Africa. All the Black civilizations in these places were also conquered and usurped – this as a result of the great war-making abilities of Alexander the great, and his victory over the first Persian Empire in 334 B.C.


  13. Back History By The Bones
    (realhistory.com).
    Ever since their ascension some two hundred years ago: Yes, in spite all that they have taught, it’s only been about two hundred years. Caucasians (albinos of Europe ) , had busied themselves creating fake artifacts and writings to support their “Imagined Fantasy History”. And when the opportunity arose to establish their dominance over the “Normal” world of Humans, by violence and Genocide, they greedily took it. Then, after gaining dominance over the “Normal” world of Humans, they went about the task of using their total control over media and all types of communication, to teach and spread their false “Fantasy History”. The main object of their revisionists history were their former masters in Europe, the Black elite. These they simply Wrote-out-of-history, and attempted to destroy all of their artifacts, while at the same time, Writing themselves into their places, and creating fake artifacts to support their lie. With Europe’s Black elite out-of-the-way, it was then easy – with the help of Brain-dead African leaders, to establish Black skin as synonymous with Slaves and underachievement.
    With their newfound power over the worlds “Knowledge Databases” Caucasians (European Albinos) thought it appropriate to establish a racial uniqueness and exclusivity for themselves. Thus, by their telling, only they had straight-high-bridge-noses, Thin lips, Straight hair, Blue and colored eyes, Blond and colored hair, and White skin. The last three being classic indicators of Albinism, so in fact, they were trying to establish Albinism as “Normal” to Humans.

    By their own science the Caucasians (Albinos) knew that all Modern Humans were of African origin, and thus “Black Skinned”, so they attempted to explain away their “White Skin” by saying that they “Gradually” turned White in Europe, in order to better absorb the weak Sunlight in Europe, and thus aid their bodies production of Vitamin D. The problem with this lie, is that all through Human time in Europe, there are artifacts of Black Africans who retained ALL of their African features and color throughout history. Not only that, their own studies have confirmed that Blacks absorb UV rays better, and produce and store Vitamin D more effectively than Albinos: WITHOUT DAMAGE TO THE SKIN, (gullible Negroes beware of the nonsense that these people tell you). One of the many functions of Vitamin D, is to control the Calcium content of our bones: Blacks EVERYWHERE in the world, have “Bone Density” of 20% greater than Albinos – thus their lies are debunked by common knowledge. Plus our instinctive understanding of how Humans evolve, tells us that nature does not create deficiencies: Many European Albinos can barely tolerated a hour in the Sun before Sunburn sets in: Nature did not create that, the disease of Albinism did.

    See studies below :
    Racial Differences in Bone Turnover and Calcium Metabolism in Adolescent Females ,R. J. Bryant et al.
    Racial differences in calcium metabolism showed that black adolescents absorb and retain calcium more efficiently than whites. Bone turnover is greater in blacks, favoring net bone accretion. These differences may account for bone mass differences observed in adulthood .

    Redhead Pigment Boosts Skin-Cancer Risk
    From Nature magazine
    Fair-skinned, red-haired folks know — sometimes through painful experience — that they are more susceptible to the damaging effects of the Sun’s ultraviolet (UV) rays, including sunburn, skin ageing and a higher risk of skin cancers. But a study published today in Nature suggests that in mice, the pigment responsible for this colouring has a role in the development of melanoma.
    “There is something about the redhead genetic background that is behaving in a carcinogenic fashion, independent of UV,” says David Fisher, a cancer biologist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, who led the study. “It means that shielding from UV would not be enough.”
    Compared to people with darker skin, those with fair, freckly skin and red hair produce a different form of the pigment melanin. This red–yellow form, called pheomelanin, is less effective at protecting the skin from UV damage than the darker form, eumelanin. The difference is caused by a mutation in the gene MC1R.


  14. From ancient records we know exactly what modern Whites USED to look like.

    The Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus (56-118 A.D.) Tacitus: Germany Book 1 [1]. Describing the Germanics, who along with the Slav’s and Turks are the current White people in the world.

    All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them.

    So from that, we know what a true Germanic, i.e. a “Pure Albino” looks like.


  15. Press Release:
    OPENING SURINAME BLUE BLOOD IS BLACK BLOOD MUSEUM

    EGMOND CODFRIED (Paramaribo, 1959), writer and publicist, is the curator and the discoverer of the Blue Blood is Black Blood Theory (2005) which argues that Europe from 1100 to 1848 was dominated by an elite whose skin colour was described as black and brown. He displays his collection of reproductions of historical portraits often unknown and is the only museum that deals with the actual appearance of historical figures. Prince William I of Orange (1533-1584) is described as “more brown than white,” and as “brown of complexion and the beard.” (Beresteyn 1933: 1) Some of them , like William of Orange, his father in law Maurice of Saxony, and Jane Austen (1775-1817) had in addition to the brown and black skin colour also (strong) classical African features, thick and prognastic lips and/or broad noses, frizzled hair; which traits were seen as proof of pure noble blood: Blue Blood. They were the descendants of the Blue Men, the black and brown original Europeans who came from Africa 45,000 years ago (Grimaldi Man). And a part of them proclaimed themselves between 1100 and 1200 a nobility, of true Europeans. Intermarrying to preserve colour and a noble lifestyle were requirements. They styled themselves as protectors against the invading Normans, civilized and christianized the white Europeans, who only came 6000 years ago came from Central Asia. And they now also exploited them as their serfs. Typical of their domination was the brutal stifling of opposition and cruel punishments meted out as quartering, breaking the limps on the wheel, and cutting open the belly while the intestines still attached to the body were thrown into the fire. But the cruellest punishment must be the public live flaying. There was, therefore, until 1848 a European trade in human skins and these were industrially processed into book covers, clothing and even shoes for the elite. Church doors were lined with human skin, which further demonstrates that the subjugation of the serfs by the nobility was seen as willed by god. Theirs was a caste society with the whites as the outcastes. This information illustrates clearly why there was a need for a Declaration of the Rights of Man (1760), because the white serfs asked their noble masters to be seen as humans. By that time the Enlightened bourgeois “scientists” belonging to the Black intellectual elite, invented the fiction of human races and placed for strategic reasons, the white majority to the top of the evolutionary ladder, and the Moor at the bottom, just above the Apes. The Moor (Othello, Mr. Elton, Black Madonna’s, and the heraldic Moors) symbolizes nobility and Black Superiority. This showed how they exactly regarded the high Black Nobility and their Black Superiority. The French Revolution (1789-1794) was a starter and led the bourgeois, capitalist elite to power, but for the poor people little changed. Because of restorations like those by Napoleon, it took only until the last revolutions of 1848 that the white Europeans were emancipated and the nobility lost their ‘privileges’. Jane Austen (1775-1817) was described as ‘of brunette complexion,’ and as ‘a brown, not a pink colour’, and made all her fictional characters, light brown, brown, very brown and black of complexion. She wrote against the change of status of Black Europeans. The Surinamese planters and governors were part of this colored elite and nobility. After 1848, revisionist history prevailed, and everything was painted white. They used the fashionable and propagandistic portraits of the black and brown elite, who sometimes in real life also painted their faces white, and a false, whitewashed history was created. The usefulness of the Blue Blood Theory is a deconstruction of revisionist history and a deconstruction of Racism against Black people, as caused by the cruel, but civilizing and christianising domination of whites by Blacks. Whites fear and hate Blacks because they once were dominated by them. Racism is a liberation ideology. All unscientific theories about human races, skull measurements, etc are designed to turn these historical Blacks into whites and hide the history of Black Superiority. This new museum, in the stairwell of his home, Eemstraat 36 in The Hague, with the blessing of the landlord Vestia Hague South East, and only accessible by appointment, for everyone, and why you pay only € 1 per person. One can peruse the portraits of the Black rulers and their Black queens. There are reproductions of portraits of nobles and slave owners who previously were not publicly shown and are hidden in family- or academic collections because of the black appearances. Visitors will also be able to buy postcards and studies. This The Hague museum, will lead to the founding of a Suriname Blue Blood is Black Blood Museum in Suriname in 2013. bluebloodisblackblood.blogspot.com

    Information: Egmond Codfried / 068427799
    June 15, 2012


  16. I’ve got one name for All you that are spreading you Black REVISIONIWSIC LIES “OTZI” And I personally have been DNA Screened and do NOT have any NEGROE Ancestry… DNA DOES NOT LIE, BUT YOU DO!!! Go Eat some Chicken and Watermellon YOU GREEDY BASTARDS. And quit trying to take credit for accomplishments not yours.
    THE hall of Records of all knowledge were destroyed by your ilk because they could not even read thier own language. And it has been released on CNN NEWS the Egypts head curator of the Ciaro Museum stated that King Ramses the Great was of Nordic DNA, had RED HAIR and FAIR SKIN with a DNA type that does not originate from AFRICA WHATSOEVER.


  17. ” King Ramses the Great was of Nordic DNA, had RED HAIR and FAIR SKIN with a DNA type that does not originate from AFRICA WHATSOEVER. “- Not out of Africa.
    A euroclown posted this article on the 24/12/2012.
    Where is the DNA evidence ?

    ” FOR YEARS, EGYPTOLOGY has been fighting a losing battle to hold onto an ancient Egypt that is Caucasian or, at worst, sun-tanned Caucasian.
    At the 1974 UNESCO conference Egyptology was dealt a fatal blow. Two African scholars wiped the floor with 18 world-renowned Egyptologists. They proved in 11 different categories of evidence that the ancient Egyptians were Africans (Black). Following that beating, Egyptology has been on its knees praying to be saved by science. Their last glimmer of hope has been the hair on Egyptian mummies.” -West Africa Magazine July 8, 2001, Egyptology: Hanging in the Hair ,by Anu M’bantu and Fari Supia .

    Hanging by a hair – debunking attempts by Neo-nazis to claim the heritage of ancient Egypt based on hair :

    ” Hair studies of mummies note that color is often influenced by environmental factors at burial sites. Brothwell and Spearman (1963) point out that reddish-brown ancient color hair is usually the result of partial oxidation of the melanin pigment. Other causes of hair color “blonding” involve bleaching, caused by the alkaline in the mummification process. Color also varies due to the Egyptian practice of dyeing hair with henna. Other samples show individuals lightening the hair using vegetable colorants. Thus variations in hair color among mummies do not necessarily suggest the presence of blond or red-haired Europeans or Near Easterners flitting about Egypt before being mummified, but the influence of environmental factors.”

    “…… Red hair itself is within the range of African diversity or that of dark-skinned peoples. Native black Australoids for example routinely produce blonde hair:

    Detailed microscopic analysis during the 1980s (Balout 1985) identified some of the hair of Egyptian Pharoah Rameses II as being a yellowish-red. Such a finding should not be surprising given the wide range of physical variability in Africa, the most genetically diverse region on earth, out of which flowed other population groups. Indeed, blondism and various other hair shades are not unknown in East Africa or Nubia, particularly in children, nor are such hair color variants uncommon in dark-haired or dark skinned populations like the Australians. (Hrdy 1978) Given the range of genetic variability in Africa, a red-haired Rameses is hardly unusual.”
    “…… The analysis on Rameses also did not show classic “European” red hair but hair of a light red to yellowish tinge. Black haired or dark-skinned populations are quite capable of producing such yellowish-red color variants on their own, as can be seen in today’s east and northeast Africa . Nor is such color variation unusual to Africa. Native dark-skinned populations in Australia, routinely produce people with blond or reddish hair. As noted above, ultra diverse Africa is the original source of such variation.
    The analysis also found the hair to be cymotrich or wavy, again a characteristic quite within the range of overall African or Nile valley physical and genetic diversity. A “pure” Nordic type of straight hair was thus not established for Rameses. Hence the notion of white Europeans or red-headed Caucasoids from other areas flowing into ancient Egypt to add hair variation, particularly the early centuries of the dynastic state is unlikely.”


  18. German Institute for Archaeology
    -excavation of the tombs of the nobles in
    Thebes-West, Upper Egypt. In several of
    the noble specimens:
    “The basal epithelial cells were packed
    with melanin as expected for specimens
    of Negroid origin.”

    The Greek philosopher Aristotle writes in the 4th century B.C. in Physiognomonica that the “Egyptians and Ethiopians were very black.”

    Herodotus, a Greek writer in the 5th century B.C. claims that “the people of Colchis must be Egyptians because like them they are black-skinned and wooly-haired.” (History, Book II.)

    “The Colchians, Ethiopians and Egyptians have thick lips, broad nose, woolly hair and they are burnt of skin.” — Herodotus,5th century B.C .

    zahi hawwass is a racist fraud.


  19. Note , all the ancient writers said that the Ancient Egyptians were black people.

    Aristotle says, “Those who are to black are cowards for instance the egyptians and ethiopians.”
    (Sources for Aristotle’s quotes,Physiognomics VOL 6,11.) .

    Lycinus, Lucian(125 B.C.) states: “Describing an egyptian boy, this boy is not merely black, he has THICK lips and his legs are too thin.”

    Diodorus: “The Aethiopians(Ethiopians) are highly favored with the gods, they were the first of all men created by the gods and were the founders of the Egyptian Civilization.”

    Ammianus Marcellinus: “The men of egypt are mostly brown or black with a skinny and desiccated look.”

    Vivant Denon etched the image of the Sphinx of Giza around 1798.Below is the written account about the Sphinx of Giza in Denon’s own words:

    ”…Though its proportions are colossal, the outline is pure and graceful; the expression of the head is mild, gracious, and tranquil; the character is African, but the mouth, and lips of which are thick, has a softness and delicacy of execution truly admirable; it seems real life and flesh.

    Monumental Statue Of Black Egyptian Pharaoh Found [ Taharqa of 25th Dynasty ]
    Digital Journal ^ | Saturday, January 2, 2010 | Christopher Szabo

    Archaeologists have discovered a monumental statue of an ancient black Egyptian pharaoh of the Nubian 25th Dynasty in Dangeil, Sudan, about 350 kilometres northeast of the capital, Khartoum. The granite statue of the warrior pharaoh Taharqa weighs one ton, according to its discoverer, Dr Caroline Rocheleau of the North Carolina Museum of Art… The statues of two other Nubian pharaohs were also discovered… Taharqa was ruler of both Egypt and Nubia (Kush) during the 25th Dynasty, which was based in Nubia, which had a long history of pyramid building, apparently independent of Egypt. His reign is dated from 690 BC to 664 BC. The pharaoh is mentioned in the Bible in the Book of Kings[ 2 Kings 19:9] under the name “Tirhakah.”

    http://youtu.be/kM_NQebQLkQ


  20. The Neolithic Revolution , sometimes called the Agricultural Revolution, was the world’s first historically verifiable revolution in agriculture. It was the wide-scale transition of many human cultures from a lifestyle of hunting and gathering to one of agriculture and settlement which supported an increasingly large population.
    Scholars show early Middle Easterners like the Natufians had clear links to tropical sub-Saharan African types. The Natufians were key players in the Neolithic advance. Key early migrations into the Levant & parts of Europe would be by these tropicals not Asiatics, Europeans, or Arab types.

    Quote:

    one can identify Negroid (Ethiopic or Bushmanoid?) traits of nose and prognathism appearing in Natufian latest hunters (McCown, 1939).

    Brace et al found that the craniofacial features of these early European farmers and the Natufians plotted with Sub-Saharan groups.

Leave a comment, join the discussion.