Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Yardbroom


“The UK government is poised to start measuring people’s psychological and environmental well being, bidding to be among the first countries to officially monitor happiness…countries such as France and Canada are looking at similar initiatives as governments around the world come under pressure to put less store on conventional economic measures of prosperity such as gross domestic product”…

After reading the above, I could not but reflect, on the wise words of the late Prime Minister of Barbados David Thompson:  “Barbadian Society is more than an economy.”

To underline my point; “The French President Nicolas Sarkozy, announced last year he intended to include happiness and well being in France’s measurement of economic progress.  Sarkozy was responding to recommendations made by two Nobel economists, Joseph Stiglitz and Amartsen, who called on world leaders to move away from a purely economic concept of gross domestic product, which measures economic production, to well being and sustainability”.

To those who talk ad infinitum about the economy, the message is now gaining ground; that the economy has a part to play in the affairs of any country – and an important one.  However, it cannot be the only measure, which determines well being, happiness and how individuals in a society feel about themselves.

David Thompson’s “blueprint” for the future prosperity of Barbados, was concisely summed up in the words he used when addressing a DLP audience:

“It is what we do today that will secure the future of our children of tomorrow”. It is not by accident that he looked to the future – not immediate short term gains – and in his vision of that future, beseeched us to think of our children.  David Thompson being a family man of integrity, placed great emphasis on that unit, because he no doubt felt, the family was at the core of our future success.  Perhaps he believed as I do, that there is “more to a marriage than four legs in a bed”. His belief that families were important, has for some time been of significance to those who had insight, and sought improvement for their children and society.  That David Thompson was able to refocus the public in Barbados, on what he thought important, in a relatively short time as Prime Minister, indicated the measure of the man.

It was Keith Wrightson when giving his view of the family’s contribution to society who wrote: “Through the family, society reproduced itself; children were born and reared and prosperity was transmitted from generation to generation.  Within the family, individuals found security and identity and the satisfaction of both physical and emotional needs not catered for by other social institutions.”  Like most societies, Barbadian society has its share of problems, but David Thompson having identified those areas, sought to address the core obstacles; by trying to inculcate a feeling of togetherness in Barbados, on which could be built lasting prosperity.

As is often the case, there will be some BLP supporters, who will say with chagrin, this is DLP propaganda.  To them I can only say, I am not now, or have ever been a part of the DLP organization.  The aforementioned are simply stated truths, through a fair interpretation of words spoken by David Thompson.  I have not mentioned omissions or commissions of the BLP but through  cogent reasoning has arrived at my conclusions.

To those who have a different view – and many will – of the impact of the economy on society.  I would only add, if the economy is the axle on which the wheel of society turns; I put it to you, that within that wheel of society, are families generating out like myriad spokes, turning often slowly but making progress towards a better society for all, where the right conditions exist.

This is my analysis of the vision of the late Prime Minister of Barbados David Thompson.  It is now left to Prime Minister Freundel Stuart to build upon and expand that blueprint.  It was Roxanne Easley who wrote:

“Politics is not just about intentions and outcomes, but also the process by which intentions are  translated into outcomes”. Prime Minister Freundel Stuart can now carry on the processes outlined by David Thompson.  If we were in any doubt about the merits of David Thompson’s vision, now we see advanced developed countries, seeking to use that same blueprint for success, and a feeling of well being in their societies.

It would be a dereliction of responsibility, if this golden opportunity is missed and energies dissipated in unnecessary elections and the dithering and uncertainty which could result.  Prime Minister Stuart seize the hour, because it is upon “you”.  That others – in opposition – might wish you to do otherwise, are not valid grounds for you to do their bidding.

Acknowledgements:

The Guardian, London, Allegra Stratton.
Keith Wrightson

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. Shupes. Take happiness to the supermarket to pay for groceries!


  2. That sounds to me like a reworked wording of “quality of life”. Hasn’t the UN been doing that index for years? And hasn’t Barbados been consistently scoring heavily and high on that index over the years with both BLP and DLP administrations?

    “Society or Economy”; Happiness index. They’re all all talk and buzz words merely designed to obfuscate the real issues and ignore the harsh realities facing the respective populations. The late David Thompson as well as the UK and French Government have done this to misdirect their respective “subjects”.

    I spent some time in Suriname some years ago and was really very impressed with the apparent quality of basic living, happiness, communion with nature and the almighty and the beauty, knowledge and care of their almost pristine environments by the “bush negro” communities. It seemed quite idyllic until it became apparent that most of the youngsters in those communities were voting with their feet against that way of life and moving towards the bright lights into the big cities where they were ill prepared for the life there and eventally got involved in petty criminal activities to support themselves.

    If we think this whole situation through it may become apparent that these things are all trickery. Having tasted of the fruits of modernization people in countries like Barbados will find it well nigh impossible to revert to an earlier, though idyllic, life style unless and until we are forced to by ECONOMIC or catastrophic circumstances.

    As to which came first. It looks like David Thompson won that race and was followed by the European countries you now refer to.

    Ever considered where this will lead to? Will it make Barbadians more amenable to going back to the land (what is left of it to go back to)? Will we strive for real food security and dig up the Golf Courses and turn the Hotels into villages? Where will the foreign exchange come from?

    We can do more for agriculture, we can do more for the poor and disadvantaged but it has to be thought out carefully beyond the barren sloganeering.

    Previous Governments of Barbados have all worked to find a reasonable balance between “the economy and the society”. David Thompson started the imbalance. It looks at present as if Freundal Stuart will be continuing his onslaught.

    I hope that Chris Sinckler will inject some good sense and discipline into the equation with his budget. He has all the attributes for doing so. But will Stuart and his ministerial colleagues allow this? Or will they put the perceived needs of the DLP first?


  3. Barbados was more than an economy years ago when indigenous bajans used to look out for each other and we shared whatever we had with our neighbour. Life has changed, within some villages now there are many non-bajans than who do not mix with the villagers. Then there are the one who came up in the village and has graduated to the HEIGHTS AND Terraces and live behind electronicgates with big guard dogs, but is now preferring to go into the supermarket and purchase a breadfruit than to go back into the village from whence they came and pick one from a family tree or ask one of your former neighbours for one. If bajan would redevelop the spirit of sharing once more,it will allow the almighty dollar to go much further.


  4. We need to get away from this notion of returning to previous values or life styles because truth be told no country on earth has figured out how to return an entire nation to some previous point in time except by force. There is no going back period. No one is going to give up their BlackBerry or mortgage to go back home to their mom unless Rome is burning down. So lets focus on the future and leave the past in the past. As for society versus economy one should analyze it out of the box. An economy cannot exist with out a society and vise versa. Actually the term economics comes from the Ancient Greek οἰκονομία (oikonomia, “management of a household, administration”). So the building blocks of every large or small economy starts with the households economy. Further the households economy in turns in what determines the quality of life in a society. They are both inter-related and joined at the hip. Weather we live in the village or the terrace and the heights we are part of the economic system of our house hold and our country. Everyone plays a little part to the benefit of all. We cannot talk of an economy and a society as though they are mutually exclusive and we can some how fix one while ignoring the other. If we concentrate our efforts on fixing the societal problems we run the risk of ruining the economy which in turn will have a negative impact on the household. There is no sense in providing housing which eats up foreign exchange but cannot earn and then we can’t service debt. This in turn will affect our credit rating which in turn affects foreign investment. This unsettles current investors and they start to hoard they money just before they pack up and leave. Then we have a home but no job. There is no happy society without a well run economy and there is no well run economy with out a happy society.


  5. I hope that Mr. George Reid reads this. I wish that people would think before they start spouting propaganda in their innocence.

    Why is slavery considered such a heinous crime? I think it is because of the mental unhappiness of the slave. In today’s world many employers recognise that if their employees have peace of mind, they will be far more productive.

    The Chinese recognising that the women in industries sitting down so long passed laws that forced employers to allow employees to take a break and a stretch every so often during the course of a day’s work (apart from their lunch hour).

    Only slave drivers in the name of riches will not appreciate that metal health is very important; “happiness and well-being”. These are not part of their vocabs and tend to treat people as chattel; a treatment which they themselves would not tolerate from others. Those who would ridicule others because they place importance in well-being, happiness, etc. are not realists. Sadly, they think they are.


  6. @Cuddear | November 18, 2010 at 8:21 AM | Shupes. Take happiness to the supermarket to pay for groceries!
    ————————————
    Good response. A hungry family does not make for a happy family.


  7. @ Ace of Spades

    Rome burning!


  8. @Cuddear,

    Can you take values and morals to the supermarket? Nothing wrong with promiscuity and overindulgence right? Everybody should do it then, because it makes no difference when you get to the supermarket checkout.


  9. I should have said, … because it makes no difference “to your purchasing power” when you get to the supermarket check-out.


  10. The idea some would ignore the symbiotic nature of the relationship between the economy and society is disappointing to read.

    A successful company does not only focus on cost management and sales there is a recognition of the importance of training and non financial benefits.


  11. Everyone needs to calm down and let the discussion flow without starting to trade blows. Every opinion should be heard and has merit. What we need to do is to try to convince another party to see it our way. Some of us are too conservative and we tend to hold onto traditional ideas which is okay but travel far and wide and interact with different cultures we will see how isolated we are when we think that some how the good old days are coming back. We now buy our cake from Super Center and Price Mart at Christ so we no longer need baking pans. Thats how the world is Kings and Queens are obsolete. Lets discuss the ideas of how we can move our fragile economy forward and the well being of our society.


  12. This is really such blatant nonsense. There’s nothing spectacular about what David Thompson said. Any 10 year child knows that any country is more than economy. However, take the economy out of the equation and everything around it will collapse very quickly. At the center of any working society must be a functioning economy.
    Shupes!


  13. @Cuddear: “Any 10 year child knows that any country is more than economy.

    I would go deeper — I would argue that any 10 year old child implicitly understands that the economists (and some others) don’t have a f*u!king clue what’s going on, even though the economists (and some others) claim to know the truth.


  14. @All… LOL…

    For the record, I used the “F-word”. My comment is awaiting moderation….


  15. An economy is the sum total of all ‘commercial activities.’ It includes buying, selling, distributing, giving, taking and such other activities.

    It does not include activities such as reading a book. But if you were reading the book after paying a certain fee then this will be a part of economic activity. Similarly while gazing soulfully at a landscape is not a part of the economy, it does become one if it is part of a paid tour.

    But economy deals with things on the large scale. Economy would not concern itself with one person gazing at a landscape, but it would concern itself with the tourism industry which facilitates such gazing.

    http://biz.zeenews.com/classroom/story.aspx?catid=1

    THE DLP HAS BEEN ABLE TO REMOVE THE MYSTIQUE FROM THE WORD: “ECONOMY.”


  16. Bajan PANDAY
    The DLP has been able to remove the mystique from the word “ECONOMY.” Explain please, that statement is too vague to be left unexplained.


  17. The Scout,
    Bajan Panday is right, the DLP has taken the heart and soul out of this economy, spending all the money the BLP left in the sinking fund,the consolidated fund and using nearly all of the foreign reserves to the point now that they have turned to the NIS funds to run this country.


  18. @ Bajan Panday
    Have you ever heard of the word EXTERNALITIES?


  19. @Cuddear | November 18, 2010 at 3:05 PM | This is really such blatant nonsense. There’s nothing spectacular about what David Thompson said. Any 10 year child knows that any country is more than economy. However, take the economy out of the equation and everything around it will collapse very quickly. At the center of any working society must be a functioning economy.
    Shupes!
    ————————————————–
    Exactly…and right now the economy needs much attention.


  20. Isn’t externalities the concept which economists used to recognize that economic function in a society?


  21. Can anyone tell me about the progammes of Families First? I have heard the name, but I am yet to learn about what this organisation has implemented and whether the programmes have been successful. Thanks in advance.


  22. Families create family businesses which create the economy ….

    … we are back to the chicken and egg position!!


  23. … and there is no clever inswing or out outswing involved in this ….

    …. it is the straight ball.


  24. I is a Bajan
    When you hear the slogan ‘Families First’ what does it conjure up in your little mind? Nothing? Well, here’s another one for you to ponder:
    ‘THINK’.

  25. I is a Bajan who does asks questions Avatar
    I is a Bajan who does asks questions

    @Bonny Peppa Thanks so much! It is not what my ‘little mind’ can conjure up. Rather it is what the organization has achieved and how people in the community benefitted that interests me.
    It is truly unfortunate that they remain several among us who would rather belittle than say they are unable to provide answers.


  26. I is a Bajan who is ask questions

    And I is BonnyPeppa who could only ansa fa me, not meanin ta belittl anybody. when I hear de term ‘families first’ I conjure up in my lil mind dat we need to get back ta de rudiments a de family structure dat we had years aback n save de yutes from demselfs. we in need na organization ta tell we dah. well, not me at leas, so I speakin fa my behaff. I hope i provide a ansa. n i kno dat you in na idiot so you put your family first. I rite?


  27. So whats wrong with the the fact or cliche “A well functioning country is interdependant on a well functioning society. Somehow I think it is easier said than done. In today society people are treated as disposable.. Technology also has played a role in devaluing the importance of people . Therfore to find common ground on such a matter is almost impossible. How can a society be happy when in reality its source of generating a living is constantly under attack. People are not going to be “Happy ” having nothing. So get real sooner or later the very people who Love David Thompson in Death would have been hating him in life when the bills are due and they don’t have a job, Lets be real People and stop jiving people into a false sense of security. Everything so far has been tried . Just another gimmick.
    .


  28. @owen arthur

    “multiple ceremonies for bajans seeking to become dems

    Close to 250 people will be inducted into the Democratic Labour Party next Friday, in what it says will be the first of several such ceremonies given the volume of new members joining the party.

    This declaration came from General Secretary George Pilgrim as he addressed a press briefing on the party’s Independence week of activities being held in honour of late Prime Minister David Thompson this year.

    Asked about the induction, Pilgrim said: “Because of the volume of persons who have been joining the party, it is difficult to have all of them inducted one time. So what the executive decided to do was have a series of induction ceremonies to accommodate the traffic that we are attracting.”

    Thanks for deceiving and betraying Mia just because you suspected that David’s demised was very eminent. you have handed us waivers in the hands of the DLP. your plan did not work, fool


  29. ….. another cynical way to view this “mass induction” is that the fatted calf is about to be slaughtered and people want piece!!

    A relative of mine used to be a card carrying member of both parties, B and D.

    I think he may even have been a member of the NDP as well.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading