Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Yardbroom

Relatives carry the coffin of Edelmiro Cavazos, mayor of the tourist town of Santiago, during a public homage there last month. Mexican security forces found the body of the slain mayor near Mexico's richest city of Monterrey days after he was abducted by gunmen. (Tomas Bravo / Reuters / August 18, 2010)

More than 28,000 people have been murdered in Mexico, since President Felipe Calderon began to wage war, using the Mexican military and Mexican federal police against drug cartels which started in 2006.  The numbers seem too large to grasp in a non-military to military context, but broken down and closely examined with the faces of men, women and children behind the numbers, and the circumstances of their demise…bellows a warning of what some seek.

A mere 2649 miles (approx) lies Ciudad de Mexico from Barbados, some would venture to suggest it is in our backyard, but I think not.  Why would I bat away such a suggestion.

Some 72 Central and South American illegal immigrants were massacred on a ranch some 100 miles south of Brownsville, Texas border.  It was the third time, according to an AP report that Mexican authorities had discovered “large masses of corpses”.  In May, 55 bodies in an abandoned mine in Taxco, a tourist town.

In July the discovery of 51 corpses in a field near a trash dump of Monterrey.  On August 24 the APF reported a mini-massacre, at least 19 bodies discovered in a mine in the outskirts of Pachuca.  About two weeks ago gunmen slaughtered 17 people at a party in the northern Mexican city of Torreon.  Note 19 murdered is relegated to almost a foot-note, “a mini-massacre”.

“In footage posted on YouTube dead men’s heads have been roughly hacked away from their torsos, which are hanging upside down across the room on meat hooks, their blood draining away onto white floor tiles.  This footage was posted after 12 headless bodies were dumped onto two ranches in Mexico’s south-eastern Yucatán Tan peninsula.” – Time CNN World Sept 8, 2008

Guatemalan Representative Otilia Lux de Coti is quoted: ” We have testimonies of the Kaibiles hacking off the heads of living people with knives to terrorize communities”.  I have not mentioned that the Zetas drug cartel appears to be the main player in these atrocities, it matters not to the dead.

Welcome to the reality of illegal drugs, cartels and drug barons; some believe that if drugs are legalized the people who terrorize communities in Mexico and other such places would simply become model citizens  melt away and all would be fine and dandy.

There are some even here in Barbados,  who believe that if illegal drugs were legalized – I speak now of marijuana – it would be easy to have a spliff, a few beers on the beach and what is the harm in that.  Police resources could then be better employed in catching real criminals, they say.

When those within our borders talk of the legalization of drugs, I simply ask for whose benefit.  They say it is only marijuana, it is not addictive, and big business and Government are against the little man because there is no levy of taxes, the small man is being victimised.

If we fail to keep the wolf from the door, we will eventually wade through our own blood and the keepers at the gate would have been long corrupted, and be part of that evil trade.  I say if drugs were legalised the main players with wealth, influence and power would ensure they control the routes of supply and the supply itself.  They would fight to ensure they have a satisfactory market share.  The bit players who believe they would have a major part of the action would be blown away in the dust and the general populace would pick up the tab for the ensuing mayhem…and that would be quite a tab, which could be spent in more productive measures to help the community.

The United States is supplying $67.5 million as foreign aid to Mexico to combat drug trafficking, this coupled with Mexico’s resources has not made a dent on the social melt-down occurring in Mexico…think of poor Barbados.

To those who say the legalization of marijuana in Barbados is appropriate, in the belief that all will be sweet and dandy.  I say be careful of what you wish for, the state that now exist although not perfect will be a minor event in comparison to what will engulf us; breakdown and terror.  There are some waiting in the wings; eager to gorge themselves on the blood of others, and drugs is the oxygen that feeds their appetite.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

11 responses to “Where The Blood Flows A Deep Red: Mexico”


  1. Is Mexico under siege from groups selling say alcohol or tobacco cigarettes? Does the fact that certain substances are illegal account for the lucrative nature of the trade in these substances? The drug gangs are not pushing drugs because it is bad for the health of users. These gangs are operating because there is enormous sums of money to be made. Prostitution in Mexico does not seem to be associated with the violence and corrupting influence of the drug gangs. However human trafficking across the US-Mexico border is associated with the drug gangs. Prostitution is legal in Mexico, entering the US without visa and work permit approval is illegal.


  2. OK…where to start?
    Apparently from the beginning of time humans have consumed substances which alter their state of mind. It is archaeologically accepted that the use of Psilocybin (sic) or ‘magic’ mushrooms was widespread in middle eastern countries thousands of years ago (think visions, talking bushes etc.).It’s been suggested that so called anointing oil was made with a rather potent cannabis tincture (canna lily?). The oldest known cannabis remains were ‘recently’ found in Mongolia, I think, and were relativley intact and carbon dated to circa 2700BCE. (all female plant parts. what is referred to today as ‘Semsimelia’ ie. grown specifically for smoking). Human use of cannabis probably goes back to the earliest ancestors as we All have receptors for cannabanoids throughout our bodies (particularly the brain). Cannabanoids (used by our bodies in the regulation of metabolism, release and/or regulation of some hormones among other uses) are somewhat like B vitamins in that the body can manufacture some internally from other components. The only cannabanoids for which we have receptors but cannot make are cannabidiol and delta9tetrahydracannabinol (THC). These are found only in the cannabis plant.
    During the prohibition years in the US, the likes of Al Capone and others made a literal and figurative killing. The legal status of alcohol meant that there was no quality control (of US made spirits) and many accidental poisionings was a byproduct. This legal status also meant huge profit margins (no price controls or taxes) worth killing for.
    Fast forward nearly half a century as we have a similar situation in Mexico. Though some aspects of the business are truly abhorrent what we are seeing is competition for a market where there is no regulation or legal recourse.
    I wonder if Mr.Yardbroom is equally upset with todays producers of alcohol products. They are, as we all know or should know, addictive, poisonous and a strain on families and society in general. Perhaps he has not heard of professor David Nutt or any of his predecessors in the UK who continually urge the government of the day do downgrade cannabis and ecstasy to class C substances and upgrade alcohol and tobacco to class A (the same levels as heroin opium and cocaine).
    Pehaps Mr.Yardbroom has not heard of the work of Dr. Donald Tashkin in the US who in the largest ever study of it’s kind reported in his findings that even in the heaviest smokers (somewhere between 10 and 20 joints daily!) cannabis use is NOT related to any increased risk of cancer of the lung, neck or anywhere in the body and is NOT associated with impaired lung function.
    WHO statistics indicate that anually millions die prematurely from tobacco use and tens of thousands die from alcohol poisoning (simply drinking too much in a 24hr. period not inclusive of long term health effects). Those same statistics indicate that there has NEVER been a death attributable to cannabis.
    Individual pharmecutical products (Oxycontin and the like) are responsible for more addictions and deaths than all illegal drugs combined.
    Unfortunately scientists nor doctors not even police make laws but it’s the politicians. There is just too much money surrounding the so called drug war from the arms manufacturers supplying our police/military to for-profit prisons. The head of economic affairs for the UN stated recently that billions of dollars in cash is what kept and is keeping many banks afloat during the current financial crisis. Were cannabis legal how would pharmecutical companies survive with a cut in their profits. Not just from some of their cancer drugs but also the drusg for arthritis, glaucoma, nausea attributed to chemo./HIV treatment or any of the other medical uses for which cannnabis has been proven or shows promise. Were cannabis legal think of the profits that the tobacco companies would lose any by extension the chemical companies (tobacco farming is incredibly pesticide/fertilizer heavy whereas cannabis requires little to none).
    Where would all these fine upstanding corporations put what were once campaign donations)
    All that doesn’t matter though because we must protect the children.
    (please read that last sentence sarcastically)


  3. As YB indicated Mexico is not all that far from Barbados and the Caribbean. Is it reasonable to believe what is happening in Mexico can touch our small societies?

    What makes the Mexico situation interesting when compared to Columbia. The Columbian government negotiated with the Columbian drug lords. The Mexican government backed by the USA appears to have declared war on the drug lords who have decided to defend turf. On the horizon all we can see is BLOOD BATH.


  4. @ Hi, AL
    Quote:. . . “perhaps he -Yardbroom – has not heard of professor David Nutt or any of his predecessors in the UK who continually urge the government of the day to downgrade cannabis and ecstasy to class C substances and upgrade alcohol and tobacco to Class A ( the same levels as herion opium and cocaine”. . .

    The UK has travelled that road “before”. The UK Government decided because of adverse reports in the community to reclassify cannabis. They first put it down to class C but because of what they were seeing in the communities they realized they had made a mistake and upped the classification to B again.

    “Announcing the move in May 2008, then Home Secratary Jacqui Smith said there was “uncertainty at the least” on the future impact on young people’s mental health as a result of using cannabis. Therefore she was going to “err on the side of caution and protect the public” by upping the classification level, she said. BBC News Sat 31 Oct 2009
    PS. note the reference to “young people’s mental health.”

    In 2004, the then Home Secretary David Blunkett approved the reclassification of cannabis from class B ( which it had been since the 1971 act ) to class C.

    Cannabis and the Law in the “UK” to which you refer.
    Possession of class B drugs ( including cannabis and amphetamines ) carries a maximum sentence of five years in jail.
    Possession of class C drugs ( including Ketamine and GHB ) carries a maximum sentence of two years in jail.

    I would never “advocate” the constant or other use of alcohol or tobacco as that cannot be defended, and I make no case for their continued legalization.. However, I deal in reality, a violent situation surrounds illegal drug usage with much harm to society and we should fight against it.

    That something was consumed – or smoked – before in 500 BC, or at the beginning of time is never an argument that it should be consumed now; we deal with the situation as it is “now” and how it impacts on communities. I can think of many practices that were acceptable many years ago, but that is no recommendation for them to be allowed now.

    There are many eminent Professors who argue for the legalization of cannabis, often backed by medical research; there are also many equally eminent Professors who argue against its legalization, also backed by medical research.

    Individuals must in light of their experience with evidence based arguments and the “reality” that exist come to a decision. I have given reasons why I support my position…you not agree I am sure, however I respect your point of view.


  5. @ Yardbroom
    The point I’m trying to make is that penalties, if applied, should be lighter for the less harmful substance and increase as the relative harm increases. But this is clearly not the case and I believe we should all be asking why.
    You referred to Home Secratary Jacqui Smith’s take on reports compiled by scientist/doctors. Once again we have a case of politicians against experts in a particular field. If my memory is correct her remarks were made in reference to a study which showed an association between schizophrenia and cannabis use. But when one looks past the political comments and reads the actual report by the scientists they simply state that they found an association and clearly made the point that it should not be inferred that cannabis use causes/increases instances of schizophrenia.
    Here’s another study (please note the date);
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20483565
    Consider the case of The Netherlands which for maybe twenty years or so have decriminalized posession of cannabis and some other substances in quantities thought appropiate for personal use.
    Admittedly they are having a problem these days with ‘drug tourists’ but this can be seen as a symptom of legal differences among EU contries (individuals coming from the UK, Germany etc. and generally acting like fools), but among the local population there is reduced crime and even an overall lower rate of use among Dutch teens compared with teens from the UK or USA.
    Portugal which decriminalized ten years ago is seeing silimar results but I’m sure that some will disagree. That is their right. I just have a problem with the hipocracy.
    In the meantime here’s an interesting article.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/sep/09/war-on-drugs-legalisation


  6. @ AL
    Quote: “The point I’m trying to make is that penalties, if applied should be lighter for the less harmful substance and increase as the relative harm increases”. . .

    I agree, the problem arises with the definition of harm as clearly some disagree on the degree of harm caused by a substance, not only to the individual but to society.

    Quote: “You referred to home Secretary Jacqui Smith’s take on reports compiled by scientist/doctors. Once again we have a case of politicians against experts in a particular field”.

    I can assure you that the decision taken by politicians at least in the UK was backed by a plethora of experts on drugs. Do not believe that the decision was taken without an expert input. What often happens is that the politician takes the opinion of someone who others are opposed to. . . or at least their opinion. We must also remember that in a democracy that is what politicians are supposed to do. . . take decisions. If you disagree with their position then vote them out at an election and elect those whose opinions you are more comfortable with.

    With regard to the Netherlands, I was in Holland last year and from what I have seen of “coffee houses” – where legalised cannabis can be bought – as they are called. I was not at all impressed by the people who hang about those places…the Dutch seem in the main to let the foreigners get on with it.

    With your reference to the Netherlands. Quote; “Admittedly they are having a problem these days with “drug tourist” but this can be seen as a symptom of legal differences among EU countries ( individuals coming from the UK, Germany,etc and generally acting like fools)”

    You have “succinctly” identified the problems Barbados a “tourist destination” would have. With cannabis legalized you could not prevent individuals coming to Barbados and acting like fools and that could take many forms as Goa – in India – also a tourist destination, to its cost has found out.


  7. @ Yardbroom
    You are correct. The political decisions are made with the input of experts;
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19125633.100-drugdanger-league-table-revealed.html
    or
    http://www.bioedonline.org/news/news.cfm?art=3214
    and after having read those two articles (among many others I won’t bother to link) I can’t see anything indicative of politicians following expert advice.
    http://www.alternet.org/drugs/148013/5_things_the_corporate_media_and_government_don%27t_want_you_to_know_about_marijuana?page=entire
    I hope that like you I can get to Holland someday and yes I most likely will end up in a “cafe”. Could you tell me what about the people you saw there was unimpreessive. I would have thought that as long as nobody attempted to rob you or do some form of harm or disrespect that to each his own.
    I have seen with my own eyes a policeman stop and frisk a dreadlocked young man adjacent to three drunken tourists gettinh into their hired car to drive off into evening rushhour traffic. Tourists already come here to party and drink heavily till the wee hours. It might be better to allow them a choice that is safer for everybody.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/05/portugal-uk-drugs-decriminalisation


  8. Hi AL
    Quote: “I have seen with my own eyes a policeman stop and frisk a dreadlocked young man adjacent to three drunken tourists getting into their hired car to drive off into the evening rush hour traffic. Tourists already come here to party and drink heavily till the wee hours. It might be better to allow them a choice that is safer for everybody.”
    Do you know that there are plenty of tourists that complain of being “harassed” on the beaches of Barbados over drugs.

    I put it to you that it is quite possible to “party” and have a good time without the use of cannabis. . . your response seems to suggest that is not so. There are plenty of parties in the UK and many other parts of the world where people are partying and having a good time and cannabis is not smoked. Having a party is not dependent on smoking cannabis.

    I do not know the reason why the policeman in Barbados, stopped and frisked the dreadlocked young man near the tourists, or the circumstances which led him to do so. . . but I accept in good faith what is implicit in your statement.
    If it was profiling without evidence – because he was dreadlocked – that was obviously wrong.

    In a professional capacity, I have seen the evidence of what continued cannabis smoking has done to – unfortunately – young black men; I will leave it at that.

    You have to get most of the public, the “majority” of medical opinion and politicians to see the wisdom of your position. At this moment about 98% of countries in the world do not see it your way; that does not mean you are wrong, it means you have a lot of convincing to do.


  9. Hey Yardbroom,
    Don’t know if you’re still checking this thresd but look what I found today,
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-weil-md/can-cannabis-treat-cancer_b_701005.html
    You said “I put it to you that it is quite possible to “party” and have a good time without the use of cannabis. . . your response seems to suggest that is not so. There are plenty of parties in the UK and many other parts of the world where people are partying and having a good time and cannabis is not smoked. Having a party is not dependent on smoking cannabis.”
    I’m not sure of what I’ve said that gave you any of these ideas. Please don’t put words in my mouth.
    And if you could please include a link or two to support your arguments (unless it’s all personal hunches).


  10. whoever wrote this is extremely naive and stuck in the past…what’s the final solution in the war on drugs? when will victory be declared?
    why don’t you give us a george bush moment by declaring combat operations over in the war against drugs
    explain why the US ended the prohibition of alcohol


  11. and nice fear mongering in the outro that has nothing to do with reality
    if the illegal status is causing the blood bath in Mexico, how could legal status of marijuana of all things cause a similar bloodbath in Barbados?
    they’re more holes in this lame ramble that a barrel of swiss cheese

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading