Submitted by the People’s Democratic Congress (PDC)

Minister of Social Care, Constituency Empowerment and Urban Development

As recently as August 25 2010, in an 8:57 am post on BU, the PDC stated, inter alia: “Surely this deepening poverty and misery among the most productive and hardworking people in this country (at this time of political economic depression) will make the purpose of having the Ministry of Social Transformation’s Country Assessment of Living Conditions in Barbados seem more nonsensical and absurd than ever before, when it ought to have been clear in the first place, that neither they nor this wretched DLP Government are dealing with the real root causes of poverty and marginalization in this Barbadian society, nor are they equipped to deal with such. For, poverty cannot be dealt with adequately by any joke social agency whatever the academic qualifications are of the persons who comprise it, when already the facts of the matter are such that poverty in Barbados has long had fundamental political material and financial causes.

Furthermore, that this joke DLP Government can claim that the primary focus of the domestic policy is on building a society rather than an economy, makes the fact that there is an impending social crisis of great proportions waiting to happen sound like a DLP party that is prone to child’s play.”

Now, out of the blue the Minister of Social Care, Constituency Empowerment, Urban and Rural Development, Mr Chris Sinckler, has been telling many people in Barbados and beyond that his Ministry is going to be setting up a Poverty Reduction Empowerment Program (PREP) that will be prepping persons who fall on hard times for re-entry into mainstream society (page 3, Barbados Advocate, Monday 30 August 2010).

While this Barbados Advocate’s story did not say when, where, or through which medium this information was given by the Minister, it made it quite clear that the Welfare to Work Program – another failed poverty scheme – which would have been established under Sinckler’s Ministry, will be no longer be; that in fact,  it will be finished with, and the PREP program made to take its place.

Now, before we go any further in this article,  it is clear that the Minister is messing all around himself and on himself, figuratively speaking, and is in a very malodorous state. And he must be told so in very definitive and loud terms.

First of all, the Minister seems totally unaware and oblivious to the fact that government of which he is a part of in this country is the biggest creator of poverty in this land – and is the biggest instrumental cause of poverty  in the society – and that until a serious and progressive government comes into place and deals with the fundamental causes of poverty in this country and government’s role in increasing poverty conditions in this country, we in this Barbados would be going no where at all in fundamentally alleviating  poverty in this country.

Secondly, for the Minister to set up such a PREP program – whosoever they will be that will run it, or whatsoever the purpose it is that it is designed to achieve –  can only be described by the PDC as another exercise in political ministerial bureaucratic messing up-waiting-to-happen, and will be a certain definite waste of the people’s time and energy and income, given the massive  failures of far bigger and more structured poverty alleviation programs in this country.

And thirdly, it is moreover important now to remind Mr. Sinckler about how that monumental political joker from St. Peter, in the mid nineties, also had a so-called awakening about the need for poverty alleviation in this country, during a political canvass of the St. Michael North West Constituency (the Constituency he now ironically represents in the House of Assembly since 2008) in support of Mark Williams, after having seen for himself such deep seated poverty in that constituency; or was it that that occasion had provided the perfect excuse for the then BLP Government’s  leading the way in getting a certain type of IADB funding into Barbados, or its laying the foundation for further NGO funding from the Government of Barbados and other funding sources for various kinds of poverty alleviation proposals for precisely political reasons, and to foster the beggar syndrome mentality that is inexorably found within many NGOs in Barbados?

Nevertheless, though, thereafter the joker’s experience, many manner of things were so-called done to help alleviate poverty in Barbados, including the commissioning then of an IADB funded survey on poverty in Barbados (see online references to the Diez de Medina study 1997) on poverty in Barbados by Professor Andrew Downes, and refer to an online draft paper by Audrey Browne on Barbados’ Experience With Poverty Surveys), the creation of a Poverty Alleviation Program by the then BLP Government; the creating of a Ministry of Social Transformation that was headed by Mr. Hamilton Lashley, and the setting up of a poverty alleviation bureau within the said Ministry of  Social Transformation.

Really, too, around that time poverty alleviation was the biggest buzzterm in the political vernacular of so many people, despite its  however having so little meaning!!!
We even recall that poverty alleviation was so very scandalously tied to big elitist capital investment projects by that same monstrous political joker from St. Peter, in an address to mainly some local elites/pseudo-elites during the official opening of  the Apes Hill Project in St. James some few  years ago.

So, now, with all of those things having been so-called done under the last BLP Government, it could only now mean that – when one carefully now looks back at those times then – poverty alleviation meant objectively one fundamental thing: the taking of money and material by the then BLP government and some other local and international donors, and the throwing of that money and material at many poor and vulnerable people in Barbados  under the pretext of poverty alleviation to keep them politically quieter, weaker and more dependent than in the recent past then – Nothing fundamentally else.

For, here is it that in Barbados today incidences of poverty and misery and social deviances are becoming more and more pervasive and prevalent among the poor and the marginal middle classes, as a direct result of the consistent implementation of so many  intellectually politically backward and bankrupt policies of both the present DLP Government and the last BLP Government, and even though when we in Barbados have had DLP/BLP Governments that very erroneously falsely think that they are democratic socialist ones.

And, therefore, the very contemptible situation is seen  by the PDC whereby many of those who had benefitted from those poverty alleviation measures then, now find that the same money and material that were thrown at them in the context of poverty alleviation would have long been systematically taken from them and/or devalued respectively by this DLP Government; so that what we in Barbados have now is Mr. Sinckler taking his turn to give them and some others poverty alleviation. Woe the poverty cycle!!!

And, so, Sinckler, like another professed democratic socialist, that monstrous political joker from St. Peter, rather than deal critically with the fundamental causes of poverty in Barbados, prefers to play a dirty messy ring round game with the symptoms of poverty and with many of those who are now living in a state of poverty, perhaps to the chattering delight of many elites in this country – who, too, through implementation of their own private sector policies and outlooks are among the biggest most dastard creators of poverty in this country.

So, that this situation whereby many people – who are now or still poor and marginalized in this country, and who have been deliberately MADE into these ways by governments and the elites especially, and in such circumstances where Barbadians have had these governments  continuing to fool many of the people that they are committed to democratic socialist ideals, is a very damnable one, and one that continues to be axised on the many Western Euro-centric economic and financial methods and measurements that have been used by these governments and elites in their persisting  in creating the disgusting phenomenon of poverty amid plenty in Barbados.

Thus, it is most appropriate for the PDC to look at some of the available evidence assembled in very recent times  of the damaging political economic financial effects and conditions that have been wrought on the broad masses and middle classes in this country by the cruel and sick Euro-centric policies and measures of those governments and elitist people, and to draw our own very reasonable assumptions conclusions from them about the worsening state of poverty, and about the performance of some poverty indicators in Barbados.

Hence, according to the January 2010 Central Bank Report on the performance of the Barbados economy in 2009, with so-called inflation reaching 8.6 % in 2008, and with the cost of living and doing business in Barbados, experientially reaching stratospheric levels in 2007/2008, the poverty line today Wednesday, 1 September, 2010, must surely be set at more than the $ 110 per week per person that was needed by he/she to have a basic nutritional  basket of food and a few other things, according to the same Diaz de Medina.

And therefore too with the increases in FUEL prices by this wretched DLP Government in April 2008, and with the  increases in  MURDEROUS TAXATION by this said DLP Government in July 2008,  and with their adverse consequential impact on employment and domestic business activity levels since July 2008 and up to this point – unemployment was estimated to have went from 8.1% in 2008 to just over 10% in 2009, and GDP activity involving the Tourism, Construction, Agricultural and Manufacturing Sectors, in 2009 was estimated to have contracted by 5.3% in contrast with 2008 (2010 Central Bank Report of 2009 performance of the Barbados economy) – must mean that today the percentage of all households that was estimated to be living below the poverty line in the said Diez de Medina study must be damn well far more than the 12.7 % which represented 10, 500 households or 20 per cent of the total population in 1996.

And furthermore with there having been serious declines in international business sector activity, Foreign Direct Investment, and severe reductions in foreign remittances into Barbados – according to the said Central Bank 2010 Report, new licenses in 2009 were only a little more than half the number recorded in 2007 and 2008 in the international business sector; net private capital inflows slumped by BDS $ 295.3 million  in 2009, and remittances declined in 2009, must – along with consideration of the aforegoing variables and indicators in the two immediately proceeding paragraphs – mean that today the distribution of income across the country is far more unequal than that which, according to Professor Downes, was denoted in Medina survey whereby the top 10 per cent of the households received 32.1 per cent of total household income compared with 2.2 per cent for the bottom 10 per cent.

Hence,  Minister Sinckler is in an ideological and practical mess by his seeking to make some people in this country believe that this damned  DLP Government really cares about the worsening plight of the poor and marginalized in this country, which itself has been wickedly helped brought on by the draconian policies of this DLP Government, by his ministry’s establishing some measly  program PREP. Such behaviour is akin to a person deliberately setting his house on fire and then trying to put the fire out himself.

And, too, what nonsense attributed to him in the Barbados Advocate story about the Ministry of Social Care giving persons a hand up and not a hand out, when in truth and in fact the government has already severed the bloody hand itself from the person himself/herself that would otherwise have been been used to receive the Ministry’s so-called hand up, and what greater nonsense reportedly from the Minister about prepping persons who fall on hard  times for re-entry into mainstream society, when it is a fact that all poor and marginal middle class people already live on the fringes and margins of society of Barbados. What nonsense!!

Finally, the PDC knows that for poverty, misery and social deviance to be reasonably reduced to the minimumest levels in this country, it must necessitate first the removal of the DLP/BLP from the Parliament of this this country – thereby creating space for newer parties that are people-centered and that are very committed to do a lot for the masses and middle classes, and secondly, in an orderly harmonious way altogether, the Abolition of TAXATION, INTEREST RATES, INSTITUTIONAL REPAYABLE PRODUCTIVE LOANS, THE ABOLITION OF WORK, ETC. and in their places systems that we have dealt with before on here, and following from such things many more of the policies that we have enunciated on here and elsewhere.

Hence, these and other policies and measures are the things that we certainly know about that are needed to fundamentally deal with poverty in this country, along with the gradual improvements in the delivery of  certain educational, health, nutritional, housing and other needs and solutions in this country.

We Oblige.

14 responses to “Confronting The Scourge Of Poverty Head-on”


  1. Is Mr. Sinkler in pursuit of higher office????


  2. @ PDC
    Concision.


  3. Is it just me, or is Barbados becoming a dumping ground for substandard product.

    First, the rubbish milk that is now sold, no more fresh (unless you like goat milk, per Farmer Hoad).

    The nasty tasting milk now sold as long-life, is to me, substandard.

    Added to this, the evaporated milk is very expensive. Then, the skim milk that you get as a powder, smells funny sometimes, is this from China?

    Then, the ‘juices’ that a major company seels, seem to come from Belize and have additives like corn oil.

    Last time I chose a better one from Jamaica, which was just juice and preservative, instead of the major local brand, packaged foreign ‘jiuce’ with about ten ingredients.

    I do hope that the milk products being imported are screened properly and none come from China, which recently has had a bad record of ‘unusual’ additives in milk products for babies etc.

    I am sure that the standard of dairy, fruit and vegetables in Trinidad and Guyana is better.

    Let ius not become a dumping ground.

    Caveat – the above is an opinion only, based upon my limited observations.


  4. Minister Sinckler needs to show he has a safe seat.

    He then needs to build a powerbase within the party.

    Then his national profile must improve.

    The ministry he currently carries gives him the opportunity.

  5. St George's Dragon Avatar
    St George’s Dragon

    “Revolutions are always verbose” – Leon Trotsky

  6. Pretty Blue Eyes Avatar

    @Crusoe, take a trip to Caracas you get all the fresh milk and juices you want, even the yolk of the egg is like years ago dark orange not these light yellow things, our island need to utilise these products from our next door neighbours, we would be better of for it.
    @PDC, I con understand what Minister Sinckler is trying to do, but doesn’t anyone in that ministry possess a degree of even a diploma in Social Work or Sociology, If they do, how could we explain why some families are in the welfare system for 3 to 4 generations. Something is wrong we need to educate these people teach them and empower them with knowledge, not just give them a handout, they would always be coming back, We need to seriously look at this department, years from now it might even surpass the biggest ministry, which is Health, and that is a bad precedent for a developing nation like ours.


  7. “Confronting the scourge of poverty?”
    Here is what the Master had to say.
    Matthew Ch 25 V9
    “…..For this ointment might have been sold for much,and given to the poor.”
    10 When Jesus understood it ,he said unto then,Why trouble ye the woman/ for she hath wrought a good work upon me.
    11 For ye have the poor always with you,but me he hath not always.


  8. @Pretty Blue Eyes

    @PDC, I con understand what Minister Sinckler is trying to do, but doesn’t anyone in that ministry possess a degree of even a diploma in Social Work or Sociology, If they do, how could we explain why some families are in the welfare system for 3 to 4 generations.

    How long has Minister Sinckler been in charge of this ministry? Is it far to tag him with this criticism?


  9. @ Pretty Blue Eyes

    That is the problem–too many Social Work degrees in that Ministry.


  10. @ David
    Minister Sinckler needs to show he has a safe seat.
    He then needs to build a power base within the party.
    Then his national profile must improve.
    The ministry he currently carries gives him the opportunity.

    You do not know how right you are this ministry will give him the opportunity to line his pockets and those of his friends from the various NGO’s.
    Consultants galore !!
    If you guys think that Mr Lashley is bad w.r.t kickbacks then you need to see Mr Sinckler in action. I believe Michael Lashley learned from him.
    He has no interest in helping anyone but himself just asked those that work tirelessly in the last campaign.
    He can not approach them for help again. Talk to those that work with him and I mean die-hard Dems to find out just how he treats persons.
    No wonder he is seeking to switch to St John should the PM be unable to continue.
    May the Lord help us if he goes to St John and he becomes the next PM if you thought Tom Adams was bad, we aint see bad yet.
    The big difference between he and Tom Adams is that Tom was intelligent and Chris is a poser like many NGO personnel. All Talk, aint got a clue where to start.


  11. Why Chris wd want to go to St John ? Ya mean he want to keep out Master Henry. Dem too smart nuh.


  12. PDC
    OK you have sounded off again at he BLP and DLP . What policies would your party implement to fight the war against poverty in Barbados. The floor is all yours.


  13. Dear as: PDC has already tolu us that they plan to abolish all taxes.


  14. Wow Anonymous! what vitriol.

    If there is one thing you can be assured of in politics, especially in the Caribbean, it is that when an opponent sees an opposite as a threat, there most rabid and less sensible supporters often spit such vitriol at their opponents it turns to the ridiculous in short order.

    We see it on this and other blogs being practiced with impunity. One the one hand we have someone like WIV, who can find not one good quality in Ms. Mottley- not one. This is a woman who was the youngest minister of education, youngest AG, youngest Leader of Government Business and youngest appointed Deputy PM in Barbados. First Female Leader of a major political party in the country and first leader of the official opposition. Yet she is no good what so ever.

    Surely now she has her ideological flaws, personal demons, (as Owen Arthur put it) and seems to much in a hurry to become PM. But surely they must be something good and useful about her for her to remain as politically durable as she has.

    Then on the other side we have this non-sense piece on Chris Sinckler by PDC made even more ridiculous by the Anonymous one. If you take it seriously you would think that this young man was a cross between Al Capone, Hitler, and daffy duck. A complete idiot, who has ill treated everybody from his campaign and in his constituency and is now looking round for a seat to run in.

    I note with such interest that the Bees are so confident of his demise politically, that they have yet to name a candidate against him. In fact having attended his constituency conference, which was the largest of all the DLP conferences with over 1500 people attending, and strongest presentation of all of them, I too left the meeting firm in the view that Sinckler should look for a seat to run in.

    I too was surprise to learn that almost every member of his campaign team was was not working before the election is now in a government Job. But i still felt that he should look for another seat because i could not see how he could win back that one.

    I open my papers almost every week and see him doing back to school supplies for parents in his constituency; i saw him sponsoring a special summer camp for children in the area, even as he assisted with sponsorship of a homework club of the 11 + children and organizing the prestigious Lawson Weekes Scholarship Programme. Donating text books to all the primary schools in his area, sponsoring the school’s kiddies kadooment band; sponsoring a skills training programme for single mothers in nail technology, pedicuring, and cosmotology. Sponsoring Football, Basketball and tennis in his area.

    I see him getting scores of houses fix up through UDC for people in his constituency, plus roads that have been in a state of disrepair fixed at long last. Street lights installed, bus stops erected, natural gas put in where in was said to be impossible. I even see now that he organize the fixing of the old development project building at the Farm, while getting Michael Lashley to agree to put down a major Housing project at Deacons road. Man he even convince housing and lands to compulsorily acquire the Texaco Cricket ground for the people in Black Rock.

    Who Chris Sinckler this Anonymous really talking about?

    He don’t mean the same Chris Sinckler that was reputed to be a successful and respected Minister of Foreign Affairs, in and outside of Barbados. Not the Sinckler that the PM summoned home to take charge of the government’s flagging social development programme. Not the same Sinckler that has brought order to the dis-order at UDC and RDC where corruption and inertia were destroying the organisation? Not the Chris Sinckler that stabilize RDC and got it building more that 50 new houses a year when its mandate allows it only 15. Is this the same fella that manage to get to long promised (since 200) but never delivered Poverty Assessment finally conducted? or the same fella that face down Denis Clarke and the NUPW three times in a single year at UDC, NAB, and Welfare, and win, leaving the union talking about shutting down the country and going to court….none of which has or will happen.

    Is this the same Chris Sinckler that came in and within three months of assuming office in Social Care had the constituency councils bill before parliament and passed and the forst of the councils set up in six months?

    If these people would stop to breathe for a minute and halt their narrow political agendas they would see the value in what others have done. But alas! this is Barbados so what do you expect. It is wear the ridiculous becomes the sublime.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading