← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Hartley Henry – Principal Political Advisor to the Hon. Prime Minister

I think a big debt of gratitude is owed to those “seasoned” Barbadians who, in the depths of the current economic crisis, have taken the time to remind us who we are, what we have, where we have been as a nation and where we can go. That these wise men and women realize that times are tough goes without saying. They are not “partisan political yardfowls” looking for my approbation or anyone else’s. They speak from experience and from the heart.

We all know that nothing beats sheer experience. One is able to distill it so easily when one reads and digests the simplicity and clarity of message of some of our writers who do our country a great public service by not just calling us to arms in tough times – but calling us to arms with a specific purpose.

The quiet and enduring advice of a grand-mother who worked the fields, came home at night and scaled and cleaned fish, prepared lunch, pressed school clothes, found a tithe for Church on Sunday and raised a family of 8 or 10. Many of them are in their seventh decade and they have seen this island of ours go through the biggest modern upheavals – political, economic and social. Yet their abounding dedication as Barbadians does not cease. They quietly go about their business balancing their books and maintaining their faith.

The fisherman who risked his life every day going to sea in a Moses, never daunted and never deterred, and who often fished, sold, kept records and collected debts without being able to read or write. He then raised a family, built a house and achieved his dreams. He watches CNN too but he also knows that Barbados has beaten the odds before.

No one calls these Barbadians “intellectuals,” because their status would not afford them such lofty accolades. But they used their minds and hands, created their own strategies and methodologies for survival and triumphed! They can tell stories of their ingenuity and how they scaled hurdles. Yet these are not our intellectuals – so no one turns to hear their life experiences in tough times.

There is a reason for that. It is not quite a conspiracy. But it accords with some very frank, truthful assertions that our revered Central Bank Governor has recently made. The traditional intellectuals have come to realise that there are some things they don’t and will never understand. But they don’t really want us to know this. There are some things they can never measure.

The desire and ability of Barbadians to come together under a Social Partnership was never within the contemplation of the traditional intellectuals at the IMF. Our ability to secure foreign financing in the international market competitively on the strength of our reputation can’t be measured.

For the guys with the degrees to admit this – assuming they allow Dr. Delisle Worrell to escape – is an indication to me that sanity has returned to the economic debate. And that someone recognizes that we do not live by bread alone. More importantly, it reinforces David Thompson’s assertion that Barbados is more than an economy. We are a society of people with our own experience, outlook and aspirations. And we already have a Barbados brand.

There are thousands among us in Barbados today who travelled endless miles by boat to strange cultures and landscapes, tough weather conditions, alien environments in every sense of the word. They battled through the tough Wilson/Callaghan winter of discontent, racism, the early, difficult Thatcher years and other indignities. It was not an easy road. But they survived and many of them live comfortable lives both here and in the United Kingdom – or both. So much is being written today about how they survived that it should be required reading for this generation.

This is not a call to complacency. Or to constant ruminating about the past. It is a call for us to remember that there is no adversity or stumbling block put in the way of those Barbadians – my definition of intellectual – that could not be torn down or surmounted. They had faith, commitment, ideals, aspirations and found solutions to their daily challenges.

I was reading some threads on the internet provided by a friend of mine on the current economic discourse leading up to the debate on Starcom on Sunday and, unfit as I am to unlatch their shoes, I was frankly disappointed about the emptiness of the thoughts of some of our young leading lights. They have lost their compasses just when they need one.

Their analysis was startlingly unrealistic, cold, dry and unworthy of the products – and celebrated ones at that – of our academic system! But at least they were talking. And that is better than silence.

These young men were negative in every paragraph of their thoughts. They indicted this present crop of Caribbean politicians and the previous ones for not taking tough long-term decisions. They hauled them over the coals for their empty posturing. They forget so easily that today’s politicians are just what they will become: yesterday’s “intellectuals” and academics.

Do they really know what they are talking about? Ralph Gonsalves was one of our most controversial university academics. Owen Arthur was in the midst of substantive public economic debate from the University since the 1980’s (and, to his credit, not the mamby-pamby diatribe of this era: whether you said “gross” or “net” reserves!). Today’s political leaders were Trade Union leaders. Many were student leaders of their era. Some were imprisoned for their politics.

They were not born politicians.

One contributor, who I know well and otherwise respect, was posturing about the level of anti-intellectualism and lambasting those who believe that dancing around in front of tourists was a solution to our development needs. He said that the discussions we are now having on our economy are essentially fledgling discussions which are going nowhere! Oh, for a return of Wendell McClean, Frank Alleyne, Michael Howard and Ralph Gonsalves to public debate to correct him! The issues we are debating today about the sustainability of our economic model are decades old! He is lost – but unchallenged!

What can you distill from all of this? That, in tough times, go to the tough, the survivors for advice. They have walked the walk. They are the intellectuals and the entrepreneurs of Barbados. Yes, we need new paradigms and new methodologies to move on and to deal with technological change and so on. But an

indomitable human spirit and a national commitment to succeed will triumph and that is the paradigm we need right now.

In most cases, the “seasoned” acknowledge that Prime Minister David Thompson has been doing his best trying to juggle tough decisions, give priority to his government’s objectives and, at the same time, restoring discipline, thrift, morality, fairness, justice and patriotism.

I urge him, when he returns, to focus again on some of the simple things that made for Barbadian success and rally Barbadians around them. “Go to the ant … discover her ways and be wise.”


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

39 responses to “Wisdom That Can't Be Taught; It Must Be Lived”


  1. Labouring and Prospering with the Lord!

    No amount of political, economic, planning, etc, etc, no matter how astute it may be, can help us come through these crisis ridden times, UNLESS, we as a nation of people, REPENT and RETURN to the Only One, who blessed us in the first place, Almighty God, through His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ.

    Yes, I truly thank the Lord for so much He has blessed our little nation with, over the years, BUT, in recent decades, we as a ‘people’ have, through the process of gradualism, have turned our backs on the Lord, Oh’ yes, we pay lip service to Him, having a form of Godliness, but, denying the power thereof, can’t work!

    We have become a nation of revellers, entrenched in secular humanisn, rampant, godless consumerism, like the rest of the world (system) and it is falling apart, and ALL we hear is this economist, or that academic brain, et al offering the ‘wisdom’ of man’s sin-stained heart, which is NOT the wisdom from above, as it is carnal, cannot see what the real problem IS, and utterly fails in looking to the SOLUTION, the Lord, who alone has the ANSWER!

    “Unless the Lord builds the house (Nation) They labour in vain who (seek to) build it, (BLP, DLP, et al). UNLESS, the Lord guards the city, The watchman stays awake in vain.” (Psalm 127:1) emphasis added.

    Wake UP B’dos, before it is too late, for the day of judgment draws nigh!


  2. Well said Zoe, but it is already too late….

  3. Alex Fergusson Avatar

    People cannot get their money out of Clico but Stuart says, “Guard your mind”

    Barbadians had absolutely no defense of their piggy banks and pocket books, when the DLP executed its $108 million tax grab in 2008. It is therefore surprising that Acting Prime Minister Freundel Stuart would now tell them to guard their minds.

    Perhaps, he might be right because, already Stephen Lashley has said that the DLP inherited an economy in recession, which is a horrible lie?

    But, do you realise that Stuart’s comments are curiously coming within days of the President of BARP saying publicly that they cannot get their money out of the same Clico that Stuart said that there is nothing to shake his faith in?

    Is this the Acting Prime Minister’s way of telling BARP members that they “do not qualify for his personal support,” and or are attempting to destabilise the Government?”

    Mr. Stuarts now says that the public has to safeguard itself against detractors whose purpose was to poison their minds. Perhaps that explains why Frank DaSilva is confirming that more than 52% of the respondents in a recently conducted DLP Poll – say they would vote for the Barbados labour Party if general elections were call soon.

    It is widely accepted that the DLP is not working for ordinary Barbadians but Mr. Stuart tells them – not so – guard your mind. This is the same Freundel Stuart who said in the Nation Newspaper of March 7, 2009 that he had not heard anyone in Barbados complaining of going to Clico since January 31 to get a claim settled and leaving dissatisfied. BARP went – hence Stuart’s apparent annoyance.

    This is the same man who described a Motion of No-Confidence brought against the Minister of Finance for his poor handling of the Clico fiascos, as: “salacious rubbish,” which is “frivolous and vexatious” and should be “punished with laughter.” Barbadians want to know when the DLP is going to bring A Statement of Economic and Financial Policies (commonly called a budget) – this is no laughing matter!

    BARP members want to know exactly how does the DLP plans to protect them in their golden years? Young people want to know how the DLP intends to help them secure their first job, as it promised in its 2008 ‘Youth Manifesto.’ Barbadian workers want to know when the layoff and short weeks – a result of DLP flawed policies – will end.

    Is Mr. Stuart accusing BARP of seeking to destabilise the government simply by stating the truth publicly – that they are unable to get their money out of Clico – which constitutes elder abuse?

    Are Barbadians who are running scared because of increasing crime – seeking to destablise the government? Are the thousands of Barbadians who lost their jobs because of the poor judgment and flawed polices of the government – seeking to destabilise the DLP by being unemployed?

    Are those Barbadians who are crying out because of the DLP’s high cost of living – seeking to destabilise the government by not being able to buy food in the supermarkets? Mr. Stuart, in what way are the persons who to date – have not received their Income Tax Refunds for 2009 – seeking to destabilise the government?

    Are the women who are still waiting on Mr. Stuart to establish a Fund, so that even when fathers do not put funds for child support- they will get money – seeking to destabilise the government?

    Are the over 52% of respondent in the recently conducted DLP poll, who said that if elections were called now – they would vote for the BLP (according to Frank DaSilva) seeking to destabilise the government?


  4. Hartley writing bare shit as usual.


  5. So after all that you have said Hartley i wonder if you are on any anti psycotic drugs.What next?Exerpts from The Social Contract? By the way who is the sluggard?And what happens when you have no overseer or ruler? O Jah!

  6. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    Orson to say that “Hartley writing bare shit as usual” is to be redundant.

    You should have said merely that “Hartley writing.”


  7. That was low GP!
    …definitely below the belt.


  8. @BT & GP

    That was full on the box!

    GP be warned.

    Remember to listen to Minister Darcy ‘the forgotten Senator responsible for Finance in the absence of the PM’ Boyce at 7.30PM tonight.

    What does this say about Minister Estwick’s order in the hierarchy.


  9. David. Which station?


  10. VOB has been promoting it but if it is a national address it should be carried on all media channels as it customary.


  11. I realise that every couple of days Hartly coming with some new.What next.


  12. So, the Government’s view is that we should not be anxious about:

    1. Clico’s inability to pay pensions. Its a fine upstanding company with nothing to worry about.

    2. A rise in the public debt by $1500m in two years – a record – up to 97% of GDP from 77%. Another record.

    3. The first ever breach of the Golden Rule of public finances for three consecutive quarters: (current expenditures exceeding our current revenues).

    4. The prospect of an unprecedented two downgrades in our credit rating in 12 months, with the prospect of a downgrade below “junk” status for the first time in our history.

    5. Sufficient pressure on our international reserves, that the Central Bank Governor has unilaterally switched to looking at gross revenues, as opposed to reserves net of borrowing – the more important and usual figure as a measure of the sustainability of our reserve position.

    6 The increase in cost of living and producing from higher charges, levies and taxes.

    The Government’s view is that we should be relaxed about all of this and have full faith in Ministers and Senators, like Senator Ince from the Ministry of Finance, who does not know what the fiscal current account position is and does not appear to know the word fiscal, Senator Boyce who is afraid to come on the call-ins and Minister Estwick who appears to be sidelined. I am scared about Ince and saddened about Estwick – he probably has some ideas if he were allowed to tells us them. Soon one of these gentlemen will co-ordinate a budget and present a plan, but it will not be much of a plan, because they tell us we do not really have a major problem to plan against, or at least not one that we can do anything about.

    The policy is to tell people to relax and remind them of the cost over-runs of 2005/6/7. Implicitly, the Government says fete and guard your mind against those suggesting it is the responsibility of Government to do something now about these current non-problems.

    The international markets are of course worrying, which is why the relative cost of borrowing has increased sharply.

    I am not sure which is worse, having a serious fiscal and financial problem, or denying it? Living in a bubble of outdated election slogans. What do you think David?

  13. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    David
    I am warned. I was merely practicing what I learned from my mentor BT. Often have I recieved many such a blow from him. As you can see I learn very quickly, and very well!


  14. Hartley can afford to talk his nonsense as usual he is earning the dough from all around.

    All businesses coming to the island comes through Hartley, for a fee. He currently earns the same as a Minister to write bullshit every Thursdays as the PM’s advisor and he is the bagman for a number of low life politicians and governments in the region.

    Why does Thompson need a political advisor in the midst of an economic recession when it is really economic advice he lacks.

  15. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    Royalrumble
    When I read the local papers online, I wish that I had been a dunce at school! Now I would be very well qualified for leadership roles on Barbados. I was one of those fooled by the lyrics of Sparrow’s education song


  16. @GP

    Have to admit the two words used to described HH writing evoked plenty mirth in the BU household. Amazing how the English language can be teased to bring out the different emotions in us.

    @Conrad

    The extraordinary times we are living in of necessity call for extraordinary leadership. The economic indicators all point South, who will be bold to use the economic theories which abound to fuse the best strategy required to not only keep us afloat but steer us to the land of milk and honey.

    God please hear our prayers!


  17. @Georgie Porgie
    You need not worry(I know you are not) You have made your mark! Honorably so! It takes a special breed to be a dunce!! We all knowU R not 1.

  18. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    The point I am making Raymond that the dunces are doing very well in Barbados; they are in top positions like HH.

  19. Robert Deschappe Avatar
    Robert Deschappe

    @ Conrad:
    “The Government’s view is that we should be relaxed about all of this and have full faith in Ministers and Senators, like Senator Ince from the Ministry of Finance, who does not know what the fiscal current account position is and does not appear to know the word fiscal”

    A note on this topic; after Mr. Jeptar Ince’s ranting on that Brass Tacks Sunday programme, could you imagine that on the following Tuesday’s edition of Brass Tacks, the moderator, Mr. Tony Marshall in his characteristic haughty and arrogant manner, made some disparaging comments about Mr. Mascoll’s contribution, and hasten to get the economist Mr. Lindley Holder on the programme in an effort to dismiss what Mr. Mascoll had said, while commenting that he did not know what he was talking about. Unfortunately, for Mr. Marshall, his ego was trampled upon when Mr. Holder agreed with Mr. Mascoll’s position. Not satisfied with the outcome, Mr. Marshall, again in his usual form, sought once again to ridicule Mr. Mascoll by suggesting that he (Mascoll) should apologise for certain comments he made to Ince on Sunday. Marshall cannot help showing his political bias on Brass Tacks. It is not his fault though, David Ellis has given him the opportunity to express himself.
    Another thing, how come that Mr. Holder and Mr. Persaud were in agreement with Mascoll, and you have all types of people coming on the radio pretending to be economists, taking only Mr. Mascoll to task.


  20. Dear David,

    I don’t know how to express this idea properly. It will come across as knocking the government, but if anyone in the government party were to really reflect on it, they will see I am trying to find them a way out before it is too late.

    The DLP is a party with a proud tradition for bold policy and honest communication. But it has got itself unnecessarily caught up into a position where it no longer views Government as finding solutions to problems as it did in the 1960s and 1980s, but merely as political point scoring. Political point scoring is the job of opposition and they found one of the best in Hartley Henry at doing it. He is the consummate professional at political point scoring. But he has nothing to offer real, hard, economic problems. Faced with tough economic problems the Government’s response is not to find policy solutions, but to score political points.

    Stuart’s contributions is not to float some new ideas or finding ways to communicate the problem to the people, but to say to people “Guard your minds” or “lets not be distracted by people worrying about the present lest we forget about the mismanagement of the past”. These are nice political strokes, but they actually make it harder for the government to actually address real problems, because the political position is that there aren’t problems they can do anything about.

    The DLP’s Faustian Bargain with Hartley Henry is that they get into office, but they have no economic solutions to tough economic problems, because Hartley is not about economic policy, indeed, part of his anti-Owen message was an anti-intellectualism and that Owen viewed the society as an economy not a society.

    There is no reason why it should be this way. Henrism was merely a device to win power, but the hubris of victory seduced DLP strategists into thinking that Henrism was more than just a political campaign but was actually a coherent set of ideas. It is not. It is an empty vessel when it comes to economic policy making. Economics isn’t everything, it is nothing without societal objectives, but to do away with economic ideas at a time like this and rely upon buffoons like Ince is dangerous. It is like having a heart operation but saying that because doctors make lots of mistakes we will do it ourselves using our home-bred, god-fearing, commonsense….

    The DLP old guard must deject Henry’s anti-intellectualism and become once more the party of ideas. We have a Government caught in the headlights, frozen, and unable to do anything, hiding behind the fig leaf of it is a big global problem and the last lot did a bad job. Two and a half years into our biggest economic challenges and the Government has no fresh, bold, economic ideas and all it can do is maintain that they do not need them. How can self-respecting DLP intellectuals support that? There is nothing intrinsically DLP about that position, it is Henrism, it is not Barrowism. The real choice the DLP have is not between a set of individual personalities, but between someone who stands for Government as Leading with bold economic ideas as Barrow did, or as Government as merely the exercise of power and patronage, with Paris at CBC and Ince at the Ministry etc. Sadly, Stuart seems to have planted himself in the second camp. Maclean and Sealy too. Who is in the first? Estwick? Sinckler? Where are they? What are they saying? Now is the time for them to make some speeches to set out a vision, because we cannot afford another year in the valley of the blind.


  21. @ Georgie Porgie // July 29, 2010 at 5:06 PM

    The point I am making Raymond that the dunces are doing very well in Barbados; they are in top positions like HH.
    …………………………………………………………………………………………..
    I have to commend you for using such “nice” word (dunces) to describe them. I could surely give you a few other words that I would choose. And, they certainly would not be as complimentary as “dunces”. 🙂


  22. Reudon Eversely as the moderator wtf?

  23. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    Hoodie
    The Editor order me to behave so I trying. But its sad to watch on.

  24. G.C.Brathwaite Avatar
    G.C.Brathwaite

    @HH
    “We all know that nothing beats sheer experience.”

    You are late in coming to this conclusion. I wonder what would have happened had you dared to confess it sometime let’s say in September 2007. I have to wonder because, I am not thrilled by what I am seeing from the majority of your choir, they for the most part seem out of sync with what barbadians are thinking, saying, and surely to act upon in the coming phase of the political debacle built upon inexperience and blind ambition.

  25. George Reid, PhD Avatar
    George Reid, PhD

    @Wisdom That Can’t Be Taught; It Must Be Lived
    July 29, 2010

    “The desire and ability of Barbadians to come together under a Social Partnership was never within the contemplation of the traditional intellectuals at the IMF. Our ability to secure foreign financing in the international market competitively on the strength of our reputation can’t be measured”.

    Twenty years from now, or even ten, a current events analyst may reach relevant conclusions on the role of Hartley Henry in galvanising public opinion on our current discontents with an objectivity that a participant observer of the momentary (and, to some, momentuous) concantenation of events certainly could not claim. I do not know the double H well, but what I have heard of his evolving incarnations suggests that he is an honourable man (imagine a triple H!). But enough of that! Let me not damn him with faint praise.

    Look, I have jumped into this particular three-ring-circus, because I feel that the underlying “understanding” of the Barrovian transformation of Barbados is deeply flawed. Indeed, this misconstruction may have impeded our ability to respond proactively to the shocks and challenges that have buffeted our Island over the past, say, thirty-five years. So, what is my alternative analysis? Well I have been working on it for the past ten years. But life has an inconvenient habit of intervening…”cuando menos no lo suspecha.”


  26. @ riddle-me-reid

    Does your board ever understand your tortuous pronouncements, or is that the fundamental reason for their inaction?


  27. @Straight talk | August 4, 2010 at 5:30 PM | @ riddle-me-reid

    “Does your board ever understand your tortuous pronouncements, or is that the fundamental reason for their inaction?”

    It’s a pity that persons like you use anonymity to post comments that patently display their lack of information, substantive, knowledge, and even intelligence.

    You just don’t get it, do you! Why do you assume that I have only one style of communication? In any event, the members of the Board of Directors of the BAMCL have no difficulty in understand the issues confronting the sugar industry, the agricultural sector, and the economy of Barbados in general.

    Incidentally, I do not make “pronouncements”, nor do I operate at the lofty-heights of top down direction! Ask the litte man who is trying to farm 9 acres of land in separate locations, without adequate access to working capital. Can you help me to raise enough “Sir Grantleys” to establish a working capital fund for people like him, or do you believe that only the Government can act to provide the necessary factoring services for such small farmers? If people like you are not willing to commit yourselves to practical action, why the hell do you bother to talk about “food security”, whatever that means?

    Maybe you should consider whether the pattern of linguistic communication that I have adopted, and to which you so strenuously object, is not purposefully intended to take the mickey out of you “bluggoes”!

    Man, I gorn!!


  28. George:
    I accept the challenge.
    In my own small way, without any resources, I will attempt to positively facilitate the smaller entities to profitably challenge the monopoly currently enjoyed and propagated by your board.

    Watch this space.


  29. @Straight talk | August 10, 2010 at 3:51 AM | George:
    “I accept the challenge.
    In my own small way, without any resources, I will attempt to positively facilitate the smaller entities to profitably challenge the monopoly currently enjoyed and propagated by your board.

    Watch this space.”

    Well, if you are serious about putting your money where your mouth is (an action not recommended when having intercourse with a woman of easy virtue) you can contact BAMCL’s General Manager, Mr. Leslie Parris, at 425-0010. Incidentally, Mr. Parris’ background is in financial intermediation, both developmental and commercial, rather than digging (in) holes and planting.

    And once I have got your balls rolling, I am not going to admit any impediments to this marriage of true minds . But, in your generosity please remember that to the food-crop-farmer, money is the evil of all roots.


  30. Don’t know if this initiative will run, George, but it won’t cost a cent.
    Thanks for the offer of assistance though.
    If the pilot scheme is successful, I may then seek the advice of your Mr Parris to roll it out nationwide, and then we will BAMC in its true colours as an innovative force for food security.


  31. @George

    Not sure if you have been hearing the repeated position on the airwaves that our Ministry of Agriculture has the largest cadre of qualified people in all of the public service. However the inability of that ministry to rollout innovative projects even with limited resources has become a major highlight in the last 20 years. What is to be done George?


  32. @David | August 10, 2010 at 7:21 AM | @George

    “Not sure if you have been hearing the repeated position on the airwaves that our Ministry of Agriculture has the largest cadre of qualified people in all of the public service. However the inability of that ministry to rollout innovative projects even with limited resources has become a major highlight in the last 20 years. What is to be done George?”

    David, I did not hear the complaints since, mercifully I was off-Island for a couple of weeks (in a place where nobody knows my name!). But this is nothing new! People still harken back to the salad days of agricultural operations in Bim, when direction was provided by Sir John Saint. Pehaps we need another saint, or maybe, my sainted aunt will do.

    If, however, your question is intended to link me with what does not go on at the MARD, then I must point out that my nomination to the Board of Directors of the BAMCL was made by the Minister of Finance, under whose aegis that institution falls (CERTAINLY NO PUN INTENDED!!)


  33. @George

    Not linking you at all. It seems obvious you should be qualified to speak to the issues even if from arms length.


  34. @David | August 10, 2010 at 8:54 PM | @George

    “Not linking you at all. It seems obvious you should be qualified to speak to the issues even if from arms length.”

    Agreed! However, being competent to express an informed opinion and being willing to do so are, clearly, two different things. Human beings do not take criticisms lightly, and even mature and informed judgement can be resented, especially in our small-scale contact society. Everbody knows who “en wukking”, but seldom is any analysis done to discover why.

    The transition from colonial administration to politically- led managerial systems has been particularly difficult for agencies headed by both technical and administrative leaders. Successful coordination of policy fomulation and programme execution requires skills not normally found in university Piled higher and Deeper training programmes. It is, probably, not found at the Pine hill Dairy, either.

    OK, you have had a small excerpt from the section of my book (in development) sub-titled “Preoccupations of armies of Occupation”.

    I gon’ fuh now!


  35. To David’s statement:
    “Not linking you at all. It seems obvious you should be qualified to speak to the issues even if from arms length.”

    George Reid, PhD. replies:

    “Agreed! However, being competent to express an informed opinion and being willing to do so are, clearly, two different things. Human beings do not take criticisms lightly, and even mature and informed judgement can be resented, especially in our small-scale contact society.”

    Now, in my opinion, that is the statement of a man who does not merit being the chairman of a Monopoly board far less any board entrusted with the management of any part of the productive engines of this country. That is the statement of a man who is part of the problem and not part of the solution.

    How sad that I have had to pay taxes to help educate a man to “PhD” level to find that he is unwilling to express an opinion which that education has enabled him to make for the good of the country.

    The prestige and pay of ‘Chairman of the Board’ seem to be what matter, but when it comes to actually doing or saying something effective…

    but I am sure this will be considered an immature and ill-informed judgment which will be resented AND taken lightly.


  36. Taken together, Carson’s and George’s latest posts make depressing reading for a nation looking for inspiration and a way out of this mess.


  37. Riddle-me-Reid does not freely give information of value, nor give it for free, least of all to “bluggoes”. His pearls of wisdom must be earned, although they may be purchased as well. And while he plays the fool, and madness is his method, he hopes that some will see that there is much method in his madness.

    Awwwww, deep down, he does care!!


  38. @Inkwell | August 11, 2010 at 7:52 AM | “To David’s statement:
    “Not linking you at all. It seems obvious you should be qualified to speak to the issues even if from arms length.”

    George Reid, PhD. replies:

    “Agreed! However, being competent to express an informed opinion and being willing to do so are, clearly, two different things. Human beings do not take criticisms lightly, and even mature and informed judgement can be resented, especially in our small-scale contact society.”

    Now, in my opinion, that is the statement of a man who does not merit being the chairman of a Monopoly board far less any board entrusted with the management of any part of the productive engines of this country. That is the statement of a man who is part of the problem and not part of the solution.

    How sad that I have had to pay taxes to help educate a man to “PhD” level to find that he is unwilling to express an opinion which that education has enabled him to make for the good of the country.

    The prestige and pay of ‘Chairman of the Board’ seem to be what matter, but when it comes to actually doing or saying something effective…

    but I am sure this will be considered an immature and ill-informed judgment which will be resented AND taken lightly.”

    No, no, no! I certainly will not take your statement lightly. You seem to be one of those persons (if you are a “person”, at all that description befits you only in the legal sense of unlawfully exposing…) who hides behind the anonymity of the blog to make statements like ” Now, in my opinion, that is the statement of a man who does not merit being the chairman of a Monopoly board far less any board entrusted with the management of any part of the productive engines of this country.”

    The fact that you further compound what is a clear defamation by saying “How sad that I have had to pay taxes to help educate a man to “PhD” level to find that he is unwilling to express an opinion which that education has enabled him to make for the good of the country.” [and you add]

    “The prestige and pay of ‘Chairman of the Board’ seem to be what matter, but when it comes to actually doing or saying something effective…”

    You have neglected to check your facts before making such ridiculous statements, and therefore, it is only for the benefit of those readers of David’s excellent on-line discussion forum that I have bothered to respond to you at all.

    I used to comment on matters of interest (to me, at least) on the broadcast media, until a friend, who now sadly is deceased, pointed out that it was “a total waste of time”.
    I am seriously contemplating setting up a private on-line journal, as an alternative to contributing here, and restricting my offerings to those who I think can understand and appreciate them. OBVIOUSLY, YOU WILL NOT BE INCLUDED!!

    And so, I wish you a Maxwell Pond (to which all YOUR labours should be consigned) farewell !!


  39. Feel better, George, now that you have kicked the bejesus out of the messenger? Doesn’t change the message. You should think about it, rather than lash out defensively.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading