← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Hartley Henry – DLP Political Strategist

Prime Minister Thompson was spot on when over the weekend he alluded to the clout and might of Barbadians and other West Indians living in Great Britain and other parts of the Diaspora. Many of us tend to view our friends and relatives living in those adopting countries as minorities, but, if you stop for a moment and think, you would come around to appreciating how very influential we really are.

Bloc voting is the ploy of many special interest groups around the world. In parts of the United States of America, there is the labour vote, the tobacco growers vote, the gays and lesbians vote, the pro life vote and even the animal lovers vote. They group together and lobby for the promotion and protection of their particular interests and, in many swing States, they succeed in precipitating action; as their support is often times critical to the outcome of an electoral race.

Mr. Thompson was correct when he said that the new coalition government in Great Britain could not ignore the voice and influence of West Indian voters, because in an election as hard fought as that of two weeks ago, it is clear that such a large special interest group can make or break a governing party.

I have no doubt that millions of West Indians were among the swing voters who went to the polls and put Gordon Browne out to pasture. I have no doubt that those said West Indians are hopeful of real and meaningful change under Prime Minister Cameron. My thesis on this occasion, however, is that they simply cannot sit idle and wait to be noticed. They cannot hope that their individual Members of Parliament will remember and honor campaign pledges. My view is that they have got to keep up the lobby for early and positive action.

Voters here in Barbados have been practicing this precise strategy ever since the elections of January 15th, 2008. The Democratic Labour Party promised open and accessible government, and the electorate has not let up for a moment in demanding such.

The governing party here in Barbados promised a new concept and era of parliamentary representation and voters in this country have not permitted them to forget this solemn undertaking. Never in the history of Barbados politics has there been such adherence to the promise of accessible representation.

At an appointed hour in every month, fortnight and even week, there is a DLP Parliamentary Representative conducting a constituency clinic somewhere in this fair land. Constituency offices were formerly used for social functions, community sports or were just left shut up and battened down during the political off season. Not so in this new dispensation!

I live in a constituency where the notion of a parliamentary representative sitting weekly, monthly or even annually to discuss personal and community matters with constituents was unheard of. Indeed, a rare sighting at the odd funeral was about the most that voters could expect. Yet, they suffered in silence. Today, there is the daily opening and functioning of constituency offices and Clinics by MPs are held on a scheduled basis. Added to these, is the introduction of Constituency Councils, where ordinary citizens are today being given an opportunity to discuss and determine which community projects should receive priority attention and resolution. This is an era in parliamentary, political representation that should and ought not to be taken lightly by voters.

More recently, there is the weekly Constituency Conferences at which Members of Parliament have been mandated by their esteemed leader to report to their constituents on progress made on their behalf in the first 24 months of stewardship. The fact that no less than 1, 000 persons have been turning up each week to attend and participate in these forums, speaks volumes about the extent to which the gesture is appreciated by previously  alienated voters.

I wrote last week about the oil rich sister nation of Trinidad and Tobago throwing out a performing government on the basis of attitude. The issue in Trinidad and Tobago was not economics. They are hundreds of thousands of Trinidadians and Tobagonians doing better now than they ever have, but yet, they found it necessary to change a government that they felt was no longer there for them.

This current administration in Barbados has been dealt a terrible economic hand. It is no secret that the hands of ministers of government have been tied, as a result of reduced earnings and a compulsory deficit financing situation that has left precious little in the kitty for anything but necessities.

This government will not be able to boast in two years time of major infrastructural improvements, because the money just has not been there. It will not make record gains in the area of reducing unemployment because the economic environment is simply not conducive for such. Several other areas of priority identified while in opposition and contained in its manifesto will probably not be achieved to a satisfactory degree, again because of the cash-strapped nature of the economy. But those things that money did not have to buy and the little that could have been done with what was available has certainly been maximized to the fullest.

Look at the housing boom that is in effect across Barbados. Reflect upon the lot of our school children. Be honest about tremendous improvements that have taken place at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital. Speak to the calm and civility of labour and the industrial relations climate. Reflect upon how our farmers and fisherfolks have been assisted in this period of adversity. Give credit where credit is due in relation to tangible support given tourism and the consequent minimization of job losses. Ponder upon the calming effect of the leadership of David Thompson and the fact that once again Barbados is respected and not feared or plotted against.

This has been a period of enlightened, calming leadership where in the roughest of seas the Captain has remained cool, collective and calm. This has been a period when parliamentary representatives have earned every cent they are paid, because for the first time in many years, voters are demanding tangible, visible and measurable outturns, and, judging from the weekly reports, are receiving such.

Barbados has to date weathered the global economic storm because as a people we have voted in bloc to make Barbados work. The Team Barbados concept is working, whether or not we recognize it or knowingly contributed to its upkeep.

By and large Barbadians have become a special interest group in the quest to keep the SSS-Barbados afloat and that is an accomplishment over which we should all be proud.

Hartley Henry is a Regional Political strategist. He can be reached at hartleyhenry@gmail.com

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

16 responses to “Barbados Is Working…because of Bajans”


  1. Hartley we are doing OK because most people have gone back living within their means. But the telecommunication sector giant Lime is killing us.
    David
    What can the BU family do to help Barbadians bring lime to its knees? I know you tried already with the boycott. I did my part by reducing my internet to the minimum and would love to change to TeleBarbados but they have just made some changes where it seems the internet would not be their focus.
    Can we organise a protest march against the poor internet service being provided while they are putting on an increase of ten dollars?
    If the fair trading commission cannot control the internet and cell phone charges why can’t the government put those laws in place so the Fair trading commission can really do the job they should be doing(FAIR TRADING) not unfair trading.


  2. Yes, Fair Play. We can organise a protest march.

    You just tell us where to be, at what time, and the march is ON!


  3. @Fair Play

    It will take more than BU to bring LIME to its knees. For what it is worth BU started a Facebook Page tonight titled LIME SUCKS


  4. Barbados’ elected officials, have always led Barbados from the front. The Barbadian electorate is politically astute, globally aware and demand accountability from their elected officials. As an expatriate, I firmly believe that bajans are far more politically savy, than their neighbors in North America, and even in the Caribbean. Most bajans are very technologically wired, thus zeroed in on the productivity of their parliamentary representatives. The days of “Corned Beef and Biscuits,” are long gone. Tribal political foolishnes, has been replaced with educated demands, for a better Barbados, and for serious governmental accountability. Single minded political minutism, led to the losses of quite a few politicians in the last general election, and will account for more ex-parliamentarians the next time around. I salute you Barbados, for you truly understand that they who give the mandate to govern, can take that mandate away.

  5. Donald Duck Esq, Avatar
    Donald Duck Esq,

    HH

    Please please be fair in your reporting. I take strong objection to you saying that

    “The fact that no less than 1, 000 persons have been turning up each week to attend and participate in these forums,”. The forums you refer to are the constitutency council meetings.

    You cannnot honestly say that 1, 000 people turn up each week.

    Firstly If these councils are to be non-partisan why does the advertisement about the
    meeting refer to the Democratic labour party constituency council meeting?

    When I look at the TV news coverage of the meetings that you mandate CBC to cover, I see the same people at each meeting. Look for yourself. The seats are filled with mps, senators, prospective mps and political hangers on.

    If the MP for the constituency is so concerned about his constitutency why is it he is only covered in the press, on the sunday of his meeting, visiting his constitutency the day before?

    Don’t you realise that people see through these actions.


  6. @Callie
    Bajans are no more politically astute than anyone else. What Bajans have refuse to do over the years and that the political class wish they did, is to allow their local needs to be constantly superceeded by national needs to the point that parliamentarians can stay away from the constituency for 5 years at a time, hiding behind their ministerial responsibilities.

    So much so is this the case that Mia Mottley ever the one to continue the master/client — noble/surf political relationship started by another Mottley, said there is a need for NATIONAL PARLIAMENTARIANS.

  7. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    AH
    We must agree with you Sir!
    NATIONAL PARLIAMENTARIANS should emege from within councils of persons proven to be honest, interested and capable of functioning.

    Say we live in St Joseph our council convened by the people NOT the politicians would meet regularly to determine the parochial needs of the parish. The busimness men would contribute what they could to assist. The church, school and other civic leaders would propagete the principals agreed to by the council. The parishioners would be all involved.

    At the time of chosing a person to represent the parish at the national level it would be quite easy to determine who should be the likely candidates to be considered from among a group of persons who have actually been working within and for the parish.

    This ought to be much better that thrusting a doctor or a lawyer (as is the case now) who knows nothing about the parish, and does not care either!l


  8. Interesting the new PM in T&T has caution her MPs to stay close to the people. The reverence which Barbadians needlessly confer on politicians will be the death of us.


  9. @GP
    This is in part why I am a supporter of the Constituency councils. This has the potential to morph into a people centered movement that can break the hold that the current political class has on Barbados. All politics is suppose to be local and this has not been the case in Barbados since 1969, and the results is there to see in voter apathy, disrespect for politicians etc.


  10. GP, so you know, what Mia Mottley wanted has nothing to do with the people, beyond voting for the N-mp. She pretty much sees the political party as paramount and it is via this insitution that that national parliamentarian candidate would be selected and offered to the people for concideration. Top down as always, the political class is about managing entrance to their club.

  11. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    I agree with you wholeheartedly.AH

    Barrow is said to have stopped local Government to get rid of ED Mottley. But local Government can be effective if we dont bring class etc into the milieu.

    If you and BT and a lawyer from the area want to represent the Holders Hill area in parliament you should have demonstrated an interest in the area and have a stellar track record of being able to mobilize the constituents to come together and function and get folk within and without the area to contribute to and help them.

    Please kindly note that this does strees the handing out of cheeese cutters from your favorite shop.LOL Or cutters with deseased processed horse meat.

    But the activity IMHO should be generated from the people themselves, rather than have constituency councils foisted upon the people.

    At election time it should be obvious who should be selected, just as it was obvious who decided when the boys would stop playing bat and ball and head for thebeach or to watch Johhny Quest or The Lone Ranger in our time


  12. DLP column: Stinging rebuke

    This is not just the title of this column but the description given to the sentiments of the former Member of Parliament for St Michael West Central, Rommel Marshall, as he spoke at the St James Central nomination meeting about Kerrie Symmonds. He was at the time recalling the understanding between himself and the current BLP candidate for St James Central, ‘Cud Dear’ Symmonds.

    Mr. Marshall’s comments as reported in another section of the press on Monday, May 31, 2010 are insightful. Rommel Marshall is describing the character of one of his former Cabinet colleagues over an issue of trust. He apparently bestowed a high level of trust in the gentleman’s words; after all a man’s word is his bond. Why would Kerrie then turn around and betray his collegue who took time out to work on his behalf?

    The measure of a man has a lot to do with what his friends say about him publicly. In this context, the comments coming from his friend and fellow party member revealed that Kerrie indicated to him “he was no longer interested in representing the constituency”. After serving for just one term as a junior Minister, under a boss whom he described as being part of a group of 1 000 pounds of blubber, Kerrie Symmonds was opting out!

    It is clear that the concept of politics is a call of convenience for those on the other side seeking higher office. In recent times, we have seen the opting in and out of active politics by some former Members of Parliament. Elizabeth Thompson’s unsuccessful bid, along with Noel Lynch’s inability to convince the United States government of his eligibility to work on their soil, saw the two creeping back as if night had changed to day.

    The above experiences speak to the issue of trust. The notion of trust and political values seem to be coming up short on the Opposition BLP benches. There can be no stronger tenet on which to condemn the current BLP Opposition than the manner in which they have been treating the public. The trivialising and political hop-scotch that has come to define BLP politics is to be resented. Rommel Marshall’s view of Kerrie Symmonds is therefore not to be taken lightly as it represents the culture of politics as endorsed and supported by their Opposition Leader.

    The Thompson–led government has gone to great lengths to ensure that we redefine want public trust is about and the manner in which we treat the public. We have suggested and implemented Consti-tuency Councils and Constituency Conferences as strong signs that things will be done in a very transparent manner. Every weekend, the elected Members of Parliament move across the country reporting to constituents and responding to hard questions about constituency matters.

    This intervention is not staged or choreographed, unlike the public charades of the past Arthur administration. These conferences are streamed live over the Internet for the world to see and participate. This unique governance feature is to be found in no other CARICOM member state and this alone separates the Democratic Labour Party’s government from the BLP Opposition.

    We understand what trust is about and we intend to exercise it. This weekend, James Paul, Member of Parliament for St Michael West Central, will report to his constituents at the Ellerslie School Hall. This conference continues the renewal of trust in the elected public officials as started by the Thompson-led Government. We want to assure Barbadians that we place a high value on trust and respect for the public. We will continue to carve out those ways that secure Pathways to Progress as we continue to put people at the centre of everything that we do!


  13. Mr. Hartley Henry has opinions. Here are examples of them:

    “I have no doubt that millions of West Indians were among the swing voters who went to the polls and put Gordon Browne out to pasture. I have no doubt that those said West Indians are hopeful of real and meaningful change under Prime Minister Cameron.”

    First, it’s good to know that “West Indians” hope for “meaningful change”. It’s so much better than hoping for meaningless change.

    Second, you comical shithead, who is “Gordon Browne”? Who is he? Is Gordon Browne someone that “West Indians” should have heard about?

  14. Something Happening, and it ain't good. Avatar
    Something Happening, and it ain’t good.

    Listen Mr. Adrian Hinds. Local Government/ Constituency Councils, call them whatever you like…..these are institutions that should be determined by the PEOPLE for the PEOPLE. No Government Minister should have the power to appoint these bodies. How can the power of the political class be broken, as you say, when the same political class calls all the shots as far as these entities are concerned?

    Also, I find that CBC’s coverage of the DLP Constituency Meetings prove that they are merely opportunities for the DLP to bash the opposition. Don’t they know that the election campaign ended nearly three years ago?

    CBC does not stand for Credible Balanced Committed as they state nightly. Rather, it stands for Colossal Bull Crap. With the very regular political bashing of the opposition on CBC, should not the Opposition be given equal time to respond? It is taxpayers’ money that keeps CBC going. It is not paid for out of the coffers of the DLP. How can what CBC does be described as BALANCED? Totally unfair……Bajans are not stupid.

    But this is still my beloved country, and I pray that Mr.Thompson’s health is fully restored. And it is not only because I am thinking of his position as head of a young family that needs him. We must also consider that even with a lapse here, and a lapse there on his part, I see no one else in the DLP besides him, who comes near capable of leading this country. A bunch of jokers.

  15. Something Happening, and it ain't good....continued Avatar
    Something Happening, and it ain’t good….continued

    By the way, if you really wish to see an alternative report on a DLP Constituency Meeting, make sure you see Ian Bourne’s report from Bajan Reporter at this link regarding the St.Michael West Central Constituency Meeting.

    You won’t ever see anything like this reported on CBC TV.

  16. Something Happening, and it ain't good....continued Avatar
    Something Happening, and it ain’t good….continued

    Link did not appear. Just go to BajanReporter.com

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading