โ† Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by BAJAN TRUTH
Executive Chairman of CLICO Holdings Barbados, Leroy Parris
Executive Chairman of CLICO Holdings Barbados, Leroy Parris

How enlightening was today’s Nation newspaper? Parris ignores Chairman of Oversight Committee William Layne and sends his request or command to the Prime Minister. CLICO across the region has been viewed as a key player even a kingmaker in REGIONAL elections.ย  Could this have something to do with a line item in their accounts – miscellaneous- $14m per year. It is alleged that Parris can call Prime Ministers in the region and instruct them as to what he will tolerate and not tolerate.

Imagine that POWER.ย  But where does this power emanate from. Word from Trinidad is that it is alleged that a very senior director in CLICO describes that power thus, they have money (to finance campaigns) and they have agents (political messengers), the most powerful combination for a political force to determine who wins and loses election. Now this puts into greater context Estwick’s explosive remark on a political platform about Parris’ control of the DLP, determining who and who would get a pick. Most revealing now we understand the greater regional political dynamics.ย  Look at the dynamic duo said one observer- Parris and Hartley, hand in hand across the region, establishing and controlling governments. One now needs to determine if Thompson makes it a trio or is he a pawn.

One can now more carefully analyse the CLICO FINANCIAL DEBACLE if the above is true.ย  Can it explain why Parris can write directly to the PM to continue to write business despite the injunction by Supervisor of Insurance and the Chairman of the Oversight Committee?ย  Why with impunity he does not submit information requested of him, with no apparent consequence? Why he is still Chairman of CBC? Note that negative info about CLICO is unlikely to be carried. Why he could hire his own firm to do business for CLICO, (conflict of interest, anyone?); Why he can cash in his policies while he ask patience of others, they can wait.Could Mr. Johnson say him nay?

What about Mr. Thompson, can this explain why he of all the Prime Minister’s in the region has not taken to this day a step to put CLICO under judicial management. Guyana, Bahamas, Trinidad, just to name a few, did it promptly.ย  He only mentioned that it might be done if an agreement cannot be had with shareholders, last month. This came after the IMF dictated that this issue could severely damage the Barbadian economy, and needs to be addressed immediately as a condition of getting loans, one suspects. P.M. Thompson has assured Barbadians and the OECS region that Barbados would protect their interests, a recipe for disaster. His reason, he wanted to protect the 1400 agents jobs, especially the main job, CEO & Chairman Parris. This could be at the expense of 40,000 families in Barbados who could lose pensions and investments to take care of their old age.ย  Imagine if half,as a result of being pauperized by CLICO issue, 20,000 of themย  need assistance from Welfare and National Assistance Board etc from government because their interests were jeopardised for the benefit of Parris. What an economic and social disaster.

Not a word from the P.M. condemning anything CLICO or Parris has done so far? What a threat to democracy and the well-being of Barbadians. Whose interest is Thompson protecting, his opponents insist it is to protect the golden goose that will guarantee DLP political fortunes? You decide. Let us see what he says this week.

I just want to see this dealt with to protect us Bajans and our democracy.ย  I want to see the promised accountability, transparency and integrity.ย  So far DLP has interpreted this as being transparent about BLP behaviour and not their own.ย  I think however our expectations were that DLP promise was about how they would govern and take care of our interest, and bring prudent management of our affairs.

We are still waiting.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

92 responses to “Who Is In Control Of Whom – Executive Chairman Leroy Parris Has The Power”


  1. Here is a related article about a country which placed CLICO under judicial review:


    CLICO: Liquidator blasts firms that received $80m

    Published On:Wednesday, April 21, 2010
    By NEIL HARTNELL
    Tribune Business Editor
    CLICO (Bahamas) liquidator has blasted the poor bookkeeping at entities that received more than $80 million of the insolvent insurer’s funds, hitting out at the lack of cooperation from its Trinidadian parent and warning that “substantial funds” passed through the company without benefiting it or its policyholders.
    Craig A. Gomez, the Baker Tilly Gomez accountant and partner, in an April 15, 2010, report to the US Bankruptcy Court in the southern district of Florida, warned that the liquidation of CLICO (Bahamas) and its CLICO Enterprises affiliate would be “complex”, due partly to poor recordkeeping at the latter.
    CLICO Enterprises, which acted as the entity carrying out CLICO (Bahamas) non-insurance activities, and the Florida real estate project in which it invested the bulk of its assets, were criticised in Mr Gomez’s report for having “minimal records” on their business operations, something that had made his mission of successfully winding-up the companies – for the benefit of Bahamian policyholders and creditors – that much harder.
    In his status report to the US court, submitted by his Florida attorneys, Mr Gomez said of CLICO (Bahamas) and CLICO Enterprises: “The liquidations remain complex and substantial discovery and reconstruction of books and records will be necessary.
    “This is particularly the case with respect to Wellington Preserve [the real estate project] and CLICO Enterprises, each of which appears to have maintained minimal records of their activities.”
    And in a swipe at the CLICO entities’ ultimate owner, Trinidad-based CL Financial, and their immediate Barbadian parent, Mr Gomez “indicates that the ultimate parent company in Trinidad, the immediate parent company in Barbados, and other affiliates have been considerably less than forthcoming in response to requests for accounting information.
    “At the present time, [Mr Gomez’s] primary goals are completion of the replatting of the Wellington property to enhance its sale value, and pursuit of further discovery in several different venues in order to learn the ultimate disposition of substantial funds that appear to have passed through CLICO (Bahamas) and CLICO Enterprises without necessarily having been used for their benefit.”
    The latter is likely to be a reference to the $34 million and $15.5 million claims submitted by CLICO’s Guyana and Surinam entities, although Mr Gomez has previously said those funds – allegedly paid for annuity policies – were never paid to CLICO (Bahamas), but went directly into bank accounts in the US and Trinidad. The policies were also allegedly never issued.
    Mr Gomez, in his report to the Florida court, said CLICO (Bahamas) records “reflect the capitalisation of CLICO Enterprises and loans to CLICO Enterprises, the combination of which aggregates more than $80 million”.
    CLICO Enterprises had subsequently lent some $72 million to Wellington Preserve, becoming its largest creditor. Wellington, according to the report, owes other creditors a collective $4.7-$5 million, including real estate taxes.
    “The real property of Wellington is unencumbered by mortgages. [Mr Gomez], in his capacity as liquidator for CLICO Bahamas, advanced approximately $700,000 to Wellington in order to complete the pay-off of its Purchase Money Mortgage,” Mr Gomez’s report said.
    “The original principal of the Purchase Money Mortgage had been $35 million; at this time it has been completely satisfied.”
    Mr Gomez has been attempting to sell the project to the Hines Group, an international real estate developer, but it is understood that this may have hit a slight stumbling block. Tribune Business understands that the potential buyer has been seeking to negotiate a lower price for the 545-acre property, but the liquidator is determined not to suffer a ‘fire sale’.
    Mr Gomez said CLICO Enterprises was placed into liquidation, with him as the liquidator, after “a dispute arose over the exact ownership of the company”.
    Agent
    The registered agent, Bahamian law firm Serville & Company, “refused to acknowledge that CLICO (Bahamas) was the 100 per cent owner of CLICO Enterprises”.
    READER COMMENTS – 2 TOTAL
    House Rules
    Be nice. Everyone is entitled to an opinion even if it differs from yours.
    Be honest. Check your facts before posting.
    Donโ€™t curse. Surely you can find a way to communicate without resorting to profanity or delving into the gutter.
    Keep your comments relevant to the topic of conversation.
    Links to outside sites will be deleted.
    If you want to sell something, contact webads@tribunemedia.net to book an online advertisement.
    If youโ€™re doing something illegal, donโ€™t write about it here. And donโ€™t encourage anyone else to break the law.
    Let us know if something offensive, slanderous, libelous or just plain illegal has been posted by clicking on the โ€˜report this postโ€™ link.
    We like feedback, so let us know what you think of a story. If you have more information, share it.
    If you spot a spelling error in one of our stories or think we’ve got our facts wrong, email jrobertson@tribunemedia.net or call 242-322-1986
    Title:

    Comments:

    Your Name: (required)

    Enter text seen above:

    Posted By: sick & tired On: 4/21/2010
    Title: clico, an embarrassment for bahamian regulators
    this is utter nonsense in a day and age when corporate governance and audit committees are so commonplace. bahamian regulators s/b ashamed for their stupidity and lack of enforcement…and guess who suffers my poor bahamian brothers & sisters!!! i’m sick and tired of being sick and tired of nonsense!
    Report Inappropriate Content
    Posted By: Bush Lawyer On: 4/21/2010
    Title: Clico
    Mr Gomez:
    When are we going to get our money..or some word on what is happening..PLEASE tell us SOMETHING…We know you are between a rock and a hard place.. but we need to hear from you ..time is going by while our money is only God’s know where…
    Thank you


  2. The more we look into this case the seem more like an conflict of interest maybe to even go so far to say an abuse of power. we keep hearing of people who policies that can’t be cashed out and an told to wait and continue waiting. if there was no problems in cashing out all the maturities non one have a problem with parris cashing out his but that hasn’t the case.


  3. Stop the big business involvement in political campaigns (force parties to declare where the money came from) and this will stop


  4. Actually what we have here is a weak Supervisor of Insurance Office which currently oversees a poor regulatory framework. On top of which we have appointed a career civil servant to head a committee to lead the wheeling and dealing required to clean up the CLICO mess.


  5. One day coming soon if the PM does not divorce CLICO/Leroy Parris, then the people will have no choice but to divorce the PM/DLP.

    Because the truth is the people don’t want anymore of ther money being poured into the rat hole that is CLICO.

    If the PM cannot decide whether he is CLICO’s lawyer or our Prime Minister, then we will decide for him.


  6. David you said “Actually what we have here is a weak Supervisor of Insurance Office which currently oversees a poor regulatory framework”.

    True perhaps. So is that why the Clico boss consistently ignored the Supervisor of Insurance and dealt with the current Prime Minister directly, seemingly with impunity so far? Do the exchanges in today’s Nation really suggest that the supervisor of insurance office was weak or that a higher force was successfully used, so far, to blunt its effectiveness? I suspect we have a lot more to hear about this matter.

    You also said above “On top of which we have appointed a career servant to head a committee to lead the wheeling and dealing required to clean up the CLICO mess”

    Who else would you have chosen, given that the Government of Barbados has apparently put up at least 10 million $(??) up front to assist Clico and has provided guarantees to a number of Eastern Caribbean Governments re. clico debts, as far as I understand?

    Is wheeling and dealing the most important aspect of chairmanship in a matter such as this one? How about integrity? Perhaps any necessary wheeling and dealing could have been delegated to another member or members of the committee who have proven themselves to be particularly adept in such matters.

    What about a comment on the reported statement of the new Governor of the Central Bank that apparently approved the cashing in of the policies and the apparent divergence of that view from the strong opposite views of the oversight committee?

    Very Interesting!!


  7. @Checkit

    Would want to hear the Governor’s clarification of this matter before comment because it doesn’t ring true.


  8. J ,Thompson is already on the way out,do you really live in Barbados???The electorate has had enough of this bullshit,lost jobs,economy down,out of control cost of living,gangs rising up,broken promises and some that will NEVER be full filled,we all know now that he just wanted his chance to rape the Treasury and do the same shit that Owen and the Bees got away with,looks like Mia will have her chance after all,to be honest i don’t think Thompson has the best interest of the people at heart,not from his actions since he got into power,it’s deja vu all over again,what will he promise the people next election if there is one..to lock up BLP thieves again???

  9. Donald Duck Esq Avatar
    Donald Duck Esq

    Any comments on the composition of the oversight committee?

  10. Donald Duck Esq Avatar
    Donald Duck Esq

    an interesting aticle from the nation today

    Published on: 4/26/2010.

    by WADE GIBBONS

    ABOUT EIGHT HUNDRED PEOPLE are likely walking around Barbados today with useless pieces of paper, believing they own valid insurance policies from CLICO, according to former Prime Minister Owen Arthur.

    What is worse, Arthur suggested last night, is that according to executive chairman of CLICO Holdings (Barbados) Limited, Leroy Parris, Prime Minister David Thompson was aware of it but did nothing.

    Speaking at the successful nomination of Barbados Labour Party Christ Church South candidate Dr Jerome Walcott at Foundation School, Arthur said CLICO had no legal authority to sell business from August 2009, following the directive of the Supervisor of Insurance.

    Quoting from Sections 55 (1) and 177 of the Insurance Act, Chapter 310, which deal with the prohibition of selling insurance business and the process for requesting review of that bar, Arthur said CLICO did not follow procedure and had appealed to Thompson rather than the Supervisor of Insurance.

    Arthur explained that if CLICO did not follow procedure, according to the provisions of the law, that translated into a cancellation of the certificate to carry on insurance transactions.

    “What makes it so serious is that 800 people went ahead and entered into new insurance policies with CLICO when CLICO had no lawful authority to write insurance business,” he said.

    Arthur stated Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Finance, William Layne, had done Barbados a great service by blowing the whistle on what CLICO had done.

    “. . . Thompson knew [of it], if only because Parris said he wrote him,” Arthur argued.


  11. WHY IS PARRIS STILL THERE?

    WHERE ARE THE PRESS? SURELY THE PRIME MINISTER HAS TO ANSWER SOME SERIOUS QUESTIONS. WHEN PARRIS WROTE TO HIM, DID HE OVERRIDE THE SUPERVISOR OF INSURANCE OR NOT? WHY WAS PARRIS ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW OVER 1/4 MILLION DOLLARS WHILST OTHER POLCY HOLDERS ARE SCRUNTING?

    IF THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT ACT SOON, THIS WILL SURELY BLOW UP IN THEIR FACES.


  12. @Checkit

    To expand on BU’s earlier comment, we would be surprised if the Governor has become so involved in the management of CLICO to such a detail. Having acknowledge such, if it is true that Parris withdrew a quarter million dollars at a time the company publicly voiced it was under duress (cashflow) this would be a very unethical decision which merits discipline by the shareholders (owner).


  13. David
    “Unethical”. Yeah. I bet he’s quaking in his boots.


  14. i am policy holder at one of Clico Sudsidaries.It bothers me in this day and age with all of the accounting and financial expertised this is happening.Transparency,integrity are only words by our prime minister.I am amazed to hear our prime minister talking all fancy and not setting an example.On the political platform is one thing, but companies who support political parties are looking for payback and that is just what happen.Why appoint someone to do a job but do not give them them the autonomy to do it.It is really sad in Barbados and to see what is happening interms of investments and if some perons are not drag to the law courts this is going to look so bad on our country.Hold someone accountable.


  15. David;

    Reading between the lines re. Mr Parris’ reported statement it would appear that the context of the Central Bank Governor’s reported affirmation that it was OK for the policies to be cashed in might have been misrepresented by Mr Parris. I think it would be totally out of character for Mr De. Lisle Worrell to have given that assurance in the manner in which it was represented.

    Another matter that should be scrutinized is what is the relationship between Mr Layne, a PS and chairman of the CLICO oversight committee and the PM. Methinks the revelations attributed to Mr. Layne are far from what one would expect from a PS in relation to his boss who is put squarely in the middle of this matter. What triggered it? Is a house of rotten cards about to fall?


  16. Another matter that should be scrutinized is what is the relationship between Mr Layne, a PS and chairman of the CLICO oversight committee and the PM. Methinks the revelations attributed to Mr. Layne are far from what one would expect from a PS in relation to his boss who is put squarely in the middle of this matter. What triggered it? Is a house of rotten cards about to fall?

    @Checket-Out

    It is known the relationship between Layne and the former government was comfortable. We are not questioning his professionalism which should be a given as a senior civil servant. Perhaps his inclination to be more vociferous on the CLICO matter of late is all meshed in the politics of the matter.


  17. An expose on the political machinations of these Clico operatives gets the investors and shareholders of Clico nowhere, nor will it change the political landscape within the region. Was the decision of PM Thompson in the best interest of policyholders/ shareholders? So far this policy has worked – so far – so only time will tell if PM Thompson’s strategy will work for policyholders. I can only trust and pray that despite the players, our money and the jobs of so many, will indeed be safeguarded; but discussion on the might of Parris,or Duprey is of little help now that they have been exposed, and the powerbrokers will just make way for another set of names to take on that mantle.


  18. Is no-one going to be held accountable for our affairs? Why has someone (persons) not been locked up!

    I don’t understand it! Owen and Mia will do anything to get the power they miss! When will persons be held accountable? When????

    I just don’t get it! Only Friday I paid Clico some money for my house insurance since I decided to stick with them through this trying time and now for this thig to have happened …………


  19. The major problem with our system is that the Cabinet is usually composed of so many persons who need the Cabinet pick,that PM and in some cases the deputy prime ministers and ministers can do as they please.

    All could see the abuse that was going on with GEMS, EDUTEC, ABC Highway and others and mow with CLICO. If we had strong, really independent cabinet ministers they would hold the abusers to account. Alas many of the ministers just need that job, they cannot do better.


  20. They need to do better cause it is my f#####g money!

    I supported the DLP last election since they PROMISED persons would be locked up ….. it is now 2010 Not a fellow has been!

    Mr. Thompson the ball was in your court for quite a while! Don’t past it play the ball!


  21. In light of the revelation by head of the oversight committee this weekend about clico in breach of a directive from the office of the supervisor. Can we expect the supervisor of insurance to issue a statement shortly regarding policies sold by clico after the not to sell date? Will there be legal implications for Parris/Clico?


  22. Some of our ministers can be compromised for millions, others for hundred of thousands and I can think of some that could be bought for less than 10,000. A free whiskey here and there, regular pudding and souse, fried chicken, pork chops,and access to wild women and many tax payers dollars will be allowed to go unaccounted for.

    A little help with fixing a kitchen, replacing a roof, paying bills for children studying overseas. We have ministers and senior civil servants that have opened up the treasury to the thieves for these kinds of favours.

    That is the reality of the Barbados we live in. It will not change

    Some of these ministers owned nothing or were barely scraping by. What would you expect when given a few goodies?


  23. What I find amusing is that 800 people would still go ahead and purchase new policies with Clico after hearing of Clico’s financial problems since Jan 2009, and also hearing that they were prohibited from writing new business. I just don’t get that at all.


  24. David; You said “It is known the relationship between Layne and the former government was comfortable. We are not questioning his professionalism which should be a given as a senior civil servant. Perhaps his inclination to be more vociferous on the CLICO matter of late is all meshed in the politics of the matter”

    David, Irrespective of the relative level of comfort that civil servants at the level of PS have with either of the political parties, A PS, by public service acculturation, is hard wired to give his/her MInister the benefit of any doubt and not to put anything in the public domain unless absolutely necessary; or they have been cleared by the relevant minister to do so; or they are totally fed up and are willing to risk losing their job by such disclosures.

    I know nothing that is outside the public domain but I suspect there is much more in the mortar than is apparent in this current situation. There seems to have been no need or urgency for Mr.Layne to have made the revelations he did, especially since by inference they point negatively at the role and perhaps perspicacity of the present PM.

    Something had to have triggered Mr. Layne to go public? The PM, as far as I saw in the papers, gave the impression that the freeze on CLICO writing new policies was something that was imminent, not something that took place in August last year. How does that mesh with transparency and upholding the law. Nothing of the details were revealed until now, not even the full composition of the oversight committee?

    Why disclose these facts now? There has to be some serious matter that triggered the disclosures.

    I suspect that in the next few days we will be hearing much more on this issue and then we will be more clear on Mr Layne’s motivation for making the disclosures. I suspect that partisan political action is unlikely to have figured significantly?

    I wonder if the Nation will get some corroboration or otherwise of Mr Layne’s statements from any of the other members of the oversight committee? Perhaps they should check out Mr. Ince.

    Just to reiterate. Mr.Laynes disclosures are perhaps totally unprecedented for an active PS. They are probably just the tip of the iceberg.

  25. Trained Economist Avatar
    Trained Economist

    Clico is an important company in the Barbados economy, and whatever one thinks of Mr. Parris there are bigger concerns for the rest of the economy. In an effort to see Mr. Parris get some comeuppance some seem to want to sacrifice the rest of the policy holders as well.

    The government’s strategy is very clear if one chooses not to be distracted. The MOU is published in today’s business authority. The plan is to sell of the financial service operations of CLICO and leave the rest intact. This to me is a far better strategy than judicial management. If we think that judicial management is such a nice solution we should speak to policy holders in the OECS and other countries where it has been used.

    So far CMFC and the General Insurance company have been sold. The life insurance firm now needs to be sold. The Executive Flexible Premium Annuity is a problem product which needs to be sorted. The plan as laid out by the Central Bank governor is to restructure the EFPAs, which should then allow the Life company to be sold. I prefer to wait for such initiatives to fail before we go to judicial management.

    We complain about politicians but now the technocrats have been given a problem to solve (the technocrats dominate the oversight committee) they seem not to be up to the job. I am sorry but it seems that rather than do what, say the regulators in the Us and UK have done in the face of a far more serious financial crisis, and search for creative solutions, our technocrats want to fall back on the lazy solution of putting the matter in the hands of the courts. Trust me, if you think your money is tied up now, try judicial management.

    beyond laziness of thought some technocrats now seem caught up in personal and personality issues. For example, as far I am aware, Mr. Parris cashed in deposit that had matured at CMFC. Also, as far as I am aware CMFC has paid all its obligations to all parties. If we accept that CMFC has honored all of its payments then why is Mr. Layne raising this publicly. For Mr. Layne to make a public issue of this serves to inflame the public and give the impression that Mr. Parris was paid while others have not (which is not true in the case of CMFC). CMFC is no longer a problem and Mr. layne’s comments seem highly improper coming from a regulator and do not help.

    Mr. Parris wrote to the Minister of Finance asking for a waiver of the restriction to write new business. Some pertinent questions are:

    Was this request forwarded to the supervisor of insurance?
    Was it forwarded in a timely manner?
    Was permission granted?
    What mechanism(s) exist for monitoring compliance or non-compliance with instructions?

    There will be ample time and opportunity to deal with Mr. Parris and anyone or anything else. Can our technocrats please forget Parris and his jackass ego and focus on serving the public by doing what needs to be done to effect a sale of clico life. Goldman Sachs and others were bailed out and the financial system calmed before charges were laid.


  26. Given what we have read the question of the the day is – why has PS William Layne gone public?


  27. For Mr. Layne to make a public issue of this serves to inflame the public and give the impression that Mr. Parris was paid while others have not (which is not true in the case of CMFC).
    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
    “TE” You are saying that the PS disclosed the payment. When and where was it said. The problem is simple, if a committee was set up to monitor CLICO, why would someone overlook the said committee and submit correspondence to the PM?


  28. David, it is not only about going public, but the continued nonsense politicians are doing and blaming the civil servants. Just think about the Accountant General and his disclosures regarding the wastage by the last government. Something are happening.


  29. Opps…. the two last posts are mine.


  30. @Atman
    I would describe it as pathetic. In most of those cases I am sure it is because people do not really follow what is happening, and especially if they do not follow the news, only CBC at 7.00, and buy only the Sunday nation, how well informed would they have been. That is why you cannot have a situation where the only T.V. station is DLP T.V. By not paying attention can you imagine what happens at voting, put some money giveaways into the pot, and you get bad gov’t. Easily swayed by propaganda, innuendo, they do not vote with clear thought.

    This is what happens when the media does not do its job of getting info , providing analysis and defending the indefensible, because individual practitioners can become political. When we are like this, the machinations of gov’t hired political consultants, find our people’s minds as easy as child’s prey to manipulate. Easy case in point. The BLP should have ensured that the statutory deficit was taken care of. It was only when the other territories, Trinidad, Jamaica, Bahamas, Guyana moved swiftly to put CLICO under judicial management , that I realised all of the territories had done the same thing, allowed CLICO to run short on its statutory obligations. Why?The answer lies in what appeared at the time a half-hearted excuse by Arthur, but little focused on because one and all had swallowed HH bait that it was not David Thompson’s fault, and there is no problem. It seemed that each territory had accepted that as long as the assets of the parent company in Trinidad were strong and could cover the liabilities, then the territories could free up cash to turn it into working assets. This was monitored by way of financial statements from CLICO and info from the monitoring authority in T’dad. It means therefore that oversight now shifted from,”if anything happens we already have enough to cover our people”; to if something happens the first thing you do is judicial management to secure the interests of your people. T’rinidad had done enough and said enough, keeping the barbados gov’t and other territories informed for Barbados to have acted prudently, put in judicial mgt. right away. The only gov’t to choose to expose not only our 40,000 B’dian policy holders for a yet undisclosed sum, but the OECS to the tune of $1b. dollars. Now why? The supervisor of insurance would have had to tell Thompson and advise him on actions required and remedies available by law, GIVEN THAT THE STATUTORY FUND WAS SHORT.

    Rather than do what everyother ‘uncaring’,’ shortsighted,’ could not careless’ regional P.Ms had done (as Arthur was stigmatised as, for the same decision) Thompson made a deliberate decision not to protect us but his friend. He cannot plead his supervisor of insurance did not inform him, he would have doe so, or he should be fired. That has not happened. Now if with his intimate knowledge of Parris and Clico from his postion as friend and attorney, and Minister of Finance would he not be even more aware than most. As a friend glibly argued to me, ” He would have had it straight from the horses ASS.”


  31. William Layne has gone public because some one’s head is missing and he has to protect his.This Clico thing bollicks!


  32. First let me say that we need to understand the structure of CLICO. Mr Thornhill is the President of CLICO Life. therefore it is him who would have written the prime minister asking for an appeal. It must also be noted that he (Mr. Thornhill) is also a member of the oversight Management Group and not Mr Parris. What we are see here is a personal attack on Mr. Parris by Mr. Layne (a government civil servant) putting into the public domain information that should never have been there. Leaves me to wonder how did former prime Minister Arthur get that same information a week before Mr layne’s interview with the Nation Newspaper. Mr. Thompson you need to be a man and publicly dismiss Mr. Layne with immediate effect for bringing the generally high standard of government to such a low level


  33. @dmc: “What we are see here is a personal attack on Mr. Parris by Mr. Layne (a government civil servant) putting into the public domain information that should never have been there.

    IMHO, *all* information available to the Government should be available to the people the said Government serves.

    With very few exceptions…

    Was this an issue of National Security?


  34. “Was this an issue of National Security?”

    @ CH

    I say YES!


  35. Lets cut the chase Mr. Layne is a BBBBBBBBBBB!

    Bottom line – he is going to go home soon and is wearing his party hat!

    I think he has a B in his Bonnet!


  36. @Anonymous: “@CH: I say YES!

    Why?

    Please exactly argue your point clearly.


  37. @Anonymous: “Lets cut the chase Mr. Layne is a BBBBBBBBBBB!

    Yes. Let us please cut to the chase…

    You claim that Mr. Layne is a “BBBBBBBBBBB!

    Therefore you claim he is “to go home soon…

    Therefore you infer nothing he has to say has any value…

    With respect, when are you going to get past this tribal mentality?


  38. It is a sad day in any country and in this case Barbados, when anytime a negative remark is made about a particular political party, you are then labelled as a supporter of the opposite party. This is dangerous, since we seem to be going the same road as jamaica where the party is identified by a particular colour and if you go certain places with the wrong clour outfit, it can be bog problems.


  39. Base on the information coming out in the newspaper on Clico this weekend in is clear that there is much more in the mortar than the pestle. The more this matter drags on the more clearer it becomes that Clicoโ€™s collapse has nothing to do with the former BLP administration, Supervisors Office or the just concluded world recession.

    Clicoโ€™s downfall is as a direct result of an abuse of policyholderโ€™s money by the greed and recklessness of LEROY PARRIS and DAVID THOMPSON. The private jet, wholesale purchase of agricultural lands all through St. John, fat open cheques to finance DLP election campaigns, massive payouts in legal fees to Thompsonโ€™s law firm, the handling of a miscellaneous account of over $14 million dollars annually, the purchase of Martins Bay property for $925,000.00 cash and the construction of a monstrosity greenheart two-storey building, are all part of the sprawling fraud scheme that paralyzed and eventually decapitated a once vibrant and prosperous black company.

    Had we been living in the USA, Parris and Thompson would be facing prison time. I am of the view that immediate upon the BLP victory at the next election a forensic audit of Clico should be done. The fraud acts would be clear for all to see and the file be sent to the DPP for fast and swift execution of justice.

    What is hurtful about all this is that the bulk of the policies sold by Clico were sold to poor black working class people. People who could ill afford to suffer such level of robbery and treachery. This DLP must go.

    Who remembers what Freundel Stuart had to say about Thompson and big business some years ago? What is happening now does not surprise me.


  40. How comes when Mr. Bostic in the city was spending my tax money as he chose no one came on this blog and crucified Mr. Arthur!

    CH I know how you feel about us natives! I know Mr. Layne is a B! I am not a D but I can see how lopsided this thing has become!


  41. @Bajan Truth

    IYes it would seem that many people are ignorant to what is going on with Clico even though it has been in the news quite a bit. Obviously there are still some Barbadian adults who do not pay attention to current affairs, and you’re absolutely right that the votes of these uninformed person can easily be manipulated. Hopefully the total number of these persons are not much higher than the 800 who purchased policies from Clico after August 2009. LOL

    I also agree that the Clico issue got way out of hand because our governments failed to act in a timely and appropriate manner to secure the interest of the policy holders. I’m sure that Thompson’s actions on this issue will also be taken into consideration at the next election.


  42. S.177 which was referred to by Arthur states that the insurance company may within 30 days request the Supervisor of Insurance to refer the case for review by the Minister, in this case Thompson. The Act then requires the Supervisor to do this “with all reasonable dispatch”.

    As far as I know, the Supervisor of Insurance has not been in his post for quite a while now, although I do not know for sure that this goes back to August 2009. Apart from that the office is experiencing gridlock. (For completeness, I believe the Deputy has been acting in the post). Anyone who sends an request to the Supervisor better be prepared to wait a long time for a response – this is a fact. so it would be very reasonable to send the request directly to the Minister and copy the Supervisor.

    So, what exactly was PS Layne’s point? Was he trying to embarrass Parris, Thompson or both? Remember, the Act says that the request should be submitted to the Supervisor who should instantly forward it to the Minister. It is not for the Supervisor to rule on it.

    Now what Layne does not tell us (at least as reported in the Nation article) is what was the Minister’s response. This is a grave omission. Did the Minister give approval for Clico Life to continue writing policies, and if he did was he not within his rights to do so? The accusations from Arthur suggest that the writing of new policies was illegal, so this implies that the Minister did not grant permission. Arthur also does not tell us if the Minister responded and what he said. So what is the answer? The interpretation on this blog seems to be that Clico Life went through the back door and asked Thompson to intervene in a matter that was not his responsibility. The conclusion seems to have been reached that Clico Life should have written to the Supervisor so that the Supervisor could make the decision. But this is not what the Act says. So why did Layne make this statement and what was he trying say? Did the Nation twist his statements to sensationalize the story?

    Also, recall that during the Estimates the PM said that Clico Life had been prohibited from writing new business until it could satisfy the statutory fund requirement. Was this as a result of a second order by the Supervisor, or the first order? Did Clico Life satisfy the requirements and therefore was able to write new business again?

    Is the Acting Supervisor of Insurance making these orders on her own initiative or is she being instructed by the PS in the Ministry of Finance? Would the Acting Supervisor issue such an order without clearing it with either the Minister or the PS?


  43. Comments above by anonymous are mine.


  44. I am soooooo glad that there is a BU so that persons can try to be fair and balanced with others being B or D!

    Frig BFP long live BU!


  45. If the act states the request must be made to the Supervisor of Insurance then that is the process, it can’t and should not be written to the Minister of Finance.

    Secondly, the ‘gridlock’ being experienced at he office of the SOI can’t be an excuse, everyone is aware of the gravity of the situation facing CLICO and a sensible approach to having the matter dealt with alacrity would have been to send off the letter and follow up with a phone call.

    Thirdly, when officially appointed, the acting Supervisor has the same powers as the substantive post holder.

    All this talk about PS Layne is also biased, as far as I recall Mr. Parris was the first to publicly cast aspersions on the man’s character; and the more he speaks the more he looks like an idiot.

    As I have asked before on a previous thread, who owns those lands at Todds, Pool and Henley that are part of government’s $5 per lot programme? It is high time we stop pretending.


  46. @ Enuff // April 26, 2010 at 7:36 PM

    “As I have asked before on a previous thread, who owns those lands at Todds, Pool and Henley that are part of governmentโ€™s $5 per lot programme? It is high time we stop pretending.”

    So why don’t you stop pretending and know it is high time and TELL us the BU family?


  47. @Anonymous

    Is it $5 per lot, or per sq foot? Just asking for confirmation.


  48. What is clear amid all the cross talk there is a dearth of leadership shining through but the void is being filled with a healthy dose of egoism by the parties involved.


  49. @Enuff,

    But you have not addressed the most important question – what did the Minister do when he received the letter? Did he approve the request? Isn’t it strange that no one is saying?

    Yes, Clico could have sent the letter to the Supervisor and followed with a phone call to try and get action. Is this all that we are making such a fuss about?

    And yes, the Acting Supervisor has the same powers but who is pulling the strings?


  50. When all is said and done nobody gives a rat’s a……s
    about we the people. The government pretends as if they don’t know what is going on because when election time comes around they need them big companies to help finance their campaign. So who can the people turn to . When it comes to asking question the people get the run around . Unless the people show force one way or another the same old crap would continue no matter who is running the country BLP or DLP.

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading