← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by The Looking Glass

centralbankofbarbados
Central Bank of Barbados

Those who think that we are better positioned than many to weather the global financial crisis, and that the impact will be limited and short-term should think again. Right now the industrial states are in deep recession with little but cautious optimism for short term recovery in a shrinking world economy where job loss is projected at around 50 million in 2009. The Third World which is responsible for about 70% of world trade is buckling at the knees. Royal Caribbean Cruise Line just reported a 98% decline in revenue, and airlines are in a passenger and freight free fall. So how can we, a virtually dependent country with nothing to trade be better positioned to hold our own or weather the storm? The fact that most sectors can hold their own with decline only tourism and construction argues against the need for stimulus.

It is hard to understand—or is it given certain ‘interlocking’ connections—why it is that Clico, who will be or should be bailed out by the T&T government, is being handed $10 million in bail-out by our government when some pensioners haven’t got a check in three months. It is highly unlikely that all of Clico’s subsidiaries on the island are facing potential bankruptcy. Clico is in many ways a miniscule version of the Wall Street meltdown. The implications for Barbados will likely be shocking. Among other things it means that the Trinidad government will end up owning much more of the island, which raises the question: can Bajans own property in Trinidad? More about this as the air clears. In the meantime ponder this: will the government proposed housing project go to tender or will it be given to Clico?

Don’t bank on President Obama coming to the rescue. A front row seat in Denver failed to translate into a backdoor peep-in at the inauguration. The man has too much on his plate and little by way of scratch-grain to hand out. As a senator he co-signed a bill to kill off shore banking business (we are about fourth of 26 countries on the list). Should the bill be resurrected the off-shore component of our economy will dry up. But there may be a saving grace. There is a limit to which you can bite the hand that fed you.

Also forget CSME. The dictum “one from thirteen leaves nothing” (about the old Federation) still stands. The country in question, Trinidad, is now all powerful in the region (for the time being), owns much of the island (hear Plastic Bag), is setting up to take over tourism from us, and today imports labour from everywhere except Barbados.

Much more nationalization of banks and business recapitalization will be needed in order to avoid an outright world catastrophe. Inevitable restructuring of the financial and trade system will clip America’s wings and shift the balance of power to the East and or Europe. Already we have lost much of what we owned or thought we owned. By the time normality returns to the global economy we could be reduced to structural servitude: a severely shrunken middle class and a massive underclass; tenants rather than owners. Promises and or innuendoes of prosperity buttressed by questionable propaganda are unlikely to save us.

The current global crisis is a reminder that our flawed economy with, to quote the IMF in 2006, its “macro-imbalances,” is a breeding ground for social unrest and disorder. Discontent is often a first necessity of progress. When critical mass is reached there will likely be an explosion that will rock the foundation. However, an article in a UK paper gave assurance that the island will not be allowed to Go to Seed, which suggests that the Mother Country will take over. The time may not be far away

The state of our economy and stimulus next time


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. This person and their article, is seriously lacking in details. I am getting the impression that some bajans rather than look at the situation with real concern, and by asking themselves what can they do to give themselves a good chance of making it through such uncertainty, are engaging in partisan rhetoric. The Bee’s are out for the kill, and the minority class of elites, sees this as an opportunity to scare people into their perspective. Niether of them should be believed or see the light of day on this.

    Looking glass, can you detail for us the method used by the Central bank to put 10 million dollars towards Clico Barbados. It is either a loan or it is not give us the details as you understand them.

    Also walk us through the process by which the Government of T&T can use their control of CL to OWN more of Barbados. Here the implication being made by you as i understand it, is that the sovereign entity known as the Government of T&T will own more of Barbados, where I understand that current state of Trinidadian ownership of Barbadian real estate and corporate entities is of a private nature.

    …Bajans and other people who live within their means will make it through this GLOBAL ECONOMIC MESS.

    On a slightly different note; when i look at all the “blue zones” around the world, and i compare the lifestyle of their inhabitants to what i witness growing up in Barbados and that is provable by the high number of centernarians on the Island, I am convince that there is still a culture of simple living in Barbados and that these folks will survive any economic storm even if the younger generation don’t.

    I will ignore Peter Wickham’s echo of Gordon Brown’s call for a World body to monitor global economic activity. This is a time for countries to retreat back within their borders, and reaccess this globalization thiefery, and greed.


  2. This is a submission that was obviously sanctioned out of the Barbados Labour Party’s headquarters in Roebuck Street, St. Michael. Economies all over the world are in crisis and rather than come up with ideas which would help Barbados ride out this crisis with minimum damage these malcontents are campaigning for the next election by trying to put fear into the populace.


  3. This is not the time to play partisan politics, scoring cheap points now only make the opposition like unpatriotic in the long run.This is the time wherewe must show our maturity as a 42 yr old nation. We need to come together and ride out this crisis, “this too shall pass.” It is what we do as a nation NOW that would decide who we are when it is over. We did it in the 70’s and to a lesser extent in the early 90’s, WE CAN DO IT AGAIN. The problem is Bajans are complacent, like the weather hurricane threats, we have had, we believe, it will pass us. I got news for whoever think so, this economic hurricane is to widespread to miss us this time and if we don’t prepare properly for it we would wish that it WAA a weather hurricane instead.


  4. Excuse me for this. I tend to have a really bad habit of posting unrelated stuff to articles that i deem to be a wast of time. Again i am sorry. I am working on correcting this habit. 🙂

    Until that time:

    What is PageRank?
    PageRank is a numeric value that represents how important a page is on the web. Google figures that when one page links to another page, it is effectively casting a vote for the other page. The more votes that are cast for a page, the more important the page must be. Also, the importance of the page that is casting the vote determines how important the vote itself is. Google calculates a page’s importance from the votes cast for it. How important each vote is is taken into account when a page’s PageRank is calculated.
    PageRank is Google’s way of deciding a page’s importance. It matters because it is one of the factors that determines a page’s ranking in the search results. It isn’t the only factor that Google uses to rank pages, but it is an important one.

    From here on in, we’ll occasionally refer to PageRank as “PR”.

    Notes:
    Not all links are counted by Google. For instance, they filter out links from known link farms. Some links can cause a site to be penalized by Google. They rightly figure that webmasters cannot control which sites link to their sites, but they can control which sites they link out to. For this reason, links into a site cannot harm the site, but links from a site can be harmful if they link to penalized sites. So be careful which sites you link to. If a site has PR0, it is usually a penalty, and it would be unwise to link to it

    I just used Googles PR checker which ranks BFP and BU as a possible 4 out of 10 points. I view BFP’s recent attack on BU as one made out of fear that BU was catching up and may have even surpass them in popularity. Google searches and now it’s Page ranking seems to suggest that I may be correct. ha ha ha ha


  5. Adrian Hinds
    You don’t live here, so maybe you should back off what concerns us. Don’t try changing this posting, it is of grave importance to us. We MUST try and avoid the mass unemployment problem that George Bush caused in your country USA.


  6. Back to the posting
    We must rid this country of ALL the unwanted and parasites that have invaded this country looking for sweet life. We rode out crises before because we were true bajans, now the culture has changed drastically over the last 10 to 12 years, now we have the potential of seeing an increase of robberies, praedial larceny, and other such crimes including murder. Please we don’t want to become another Jamaica, T & T or Guyana. We can come out of this with our dignity only if we behave like true Barbadian and eradicate nuisences from among us who has the potential of disrupting this GEM.


  7. C-R-A-P !


  8. We have known for a long time that Barbadians have become fat and it has let in complacency. Maybe 700 people going home on the Four Seasons project will jolt some of us into a new reality.

    Usually in a situation like this the people need leadership, someone to rally the cause.


  9. David, what is more concerning to me today is not Four Seasons – a crisis there hurts the workers, but the captial (and the risk) is owned by foreigners. The bigger concerns is that our Yahoo PM is willing to buy back BNB at market rates.

    So the Gov’t sold most of the bank to Republic who did a good job turning it around resulting in the Gov’t minority interest being worth several times more than. Now the Gov’t will buy it back at the now higher price, likely install friends and relatives to executive positions, and all the value will flitter away as efficiencies are lost and standards fall.

    A sell low/buy back high strategy doesn’t make sense to me.

    What makes more sense as the real explanation is that CL Financial owns Republic who in turn owns BNB. CL Financial is in a bind and looking to offload some of its investment in Republic. Republic is having a bit of a run on its bank given the association with CL and would probably find it very convenient to offload its investment in BNB for cash. Particularly at the beginning of a recession when BNB’s profits are beginning to slow (see last earnings release – first time Le Hunte’s smiling face wasn’t right next to the results).

    Is this another example of Thompson helping to bail out CLICO? Is he being compensated for putting their interests ahead of his bosses (i.e. you and me)?? Or is he just an idiot???


  10. ace
    I’m convinced your vocabulary is very limited. At leaseyou can spell C-R-A-P. Congrats, that’s more than I can do.


  11. X // February 20, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    Is this another example of Thompson helping to bail out CLICO? Is he being compensated for putting their interests ahead of his bosses (i.e. you and me)?? Or is he just an idiot???
    *******************************

    When I read the Nation this morning that is the first thing that came to mind. I wonder if others think the same?


  12. @X and Pat

    Would you have imagined that a US capitalist government would have had to pump tax dollars into many of their finest bank of not to long ago? Isn’t the UK government doing same?

    What’s the moral of the story?

    Decisions are made to fit the moment.


  13. @All..

    …and the Government of Iceland collapsed because of this incompetence… …and…

    It seems /very/ reasonable to simply ask:

    1. Truly, *just* how stable and sustainable are we *all*?

    2. Please provide extensive documentation supporting the answers and claims to point one above….


  14. I will ignore Peter Wickham’s echo of Gordon Brown’s call for a World body to monitor global economic activity. This is a time for countries to retreat back within their borders, and reaccess this globalization thiefery, and greed.
    ___________________________
    @ AH

    Oh how true!


  15. X, your whole argument rest on the opinion that market rates for BNB shares will be high. I am questioning this opinion, given the world economy, and the fact that CL the current owner is in no position to play hardball. I would think that now is the opportune time to buy back BNB. Tell me why I am wrong?


  16. Speaking of Iceland’s economic crisis and political turmoil, here is an interesting coincidence. Look who was formerly advising Iceland on economic policy prior to its economy turning belly up and is now advising the Obama Administration:

    So, who is Peter Orszag?
    (Beware: Prepare for a train wreck.)

    One of the key players in the Obama administration’s $900 billion economic stimulus package is Obama’s new budget director Peter R. Orszag. Orszag, 40, is the director of the Office of Management and Budget, the arm of the White House responsible for crafting the federal budget and overseeing the effectiveness of federal programs. He worked closely with Rahm Emanuel in the Clinton administration – when the disastrous NAFTA was passed – and was one of the first Obama appointees to be approved.

    SNIP

    ”In the coming years, no bureaucrat will be as decisive as Peter Orszag,” Ezra Klein wrote recently in The American Prospect. So, who is Peter Richard Orszag and what kind of decisions will he make with the budget he controls? (Based on his background one would be well advised to prepare for a financial trainwreck.)

    Oddly, Orszag’s background has received virtually no attention in the media. At this critical moment, however, it would be foolish to ignore the troubling background of Obama’s budget director, which deserves to be looked at very carefully. Orszag, for example, could start by explaining exactly what happened to the Icelandic economy. Orszag was, after all, the founder and president of the economic consultancy firm which advised the Central Bank of Iceland – before it went bankrupt. How did Icelandic banks become so indebted? Ask Peter Orszag.

    Orszag is an economist who served six years in the Clinton administration (1993-8) under Robert E. Rubin, the former treasury secretary who recently resigned from his senior position at the woefully mismanaged and nearly bankrupt Citigroup. The fact that Orszag was a protege of the now disgraced Rubin certainly does not bode well for the Obama administration.

    Rubin strongly opposed the regulation of derivatives when such regulation was proposed in 1997. Credit derivatives of mortgage-backed securities were the key reason for the recent failure of a number of large financial institutions, including AIG and Citigroup.

    In 1999, Rubin joined Citigroup as a board member and a participant “in strategic managerial and operational matters of the Company.” The Wall Street Journal noted that Citigroup shareholders suffered losses of more than 70 percent since Rubin joined the firm and that he encouraged changes that led the firm to the brink of collapse. In December 2008, investors filed a lawsuit contending that Citigroup executives, including Rubin, sold shares at inflated prices while concealing the firm’s risks.

    Orszag, a Jew, served on the president’s Council of Economic Advisers in 1993, under Rubin, when the Israeli Rahm Emanuel, Clinton’s senior adviser, was pushing the disastrous NAFTA legislation through Congress. Prior to joining the Clinton team Orszag was an economic adviser for the Russian Ministry of Finance in Moscow from 1992-93. This was a period of rampant financial criminality during which many Russian mineral assets came under the control of the so-called Jewish oligarchs who became instant billionaires. Most of these oligarchs fled Russia when their crimes were exposed and now live in Britain or Israel, where they obtained citizenship.

    SNIP

    In 1998, after serving in the Clinton administration, Orszag co-founded an economic consulting group company with his brother and Joseph Stiglitz called Sebago Associates, where he served as president through 2007. The firm’s clients have included the World Bank, the Nordic Council of Ministers, and most notably, the Central Bank of Iceland. The once prosperous economy of Iceland has been devastated by the current economic crisis, which its citizens say was carried out by a gang of financial criminals who followed disastrous policies and advice – provided by Peter Orszag and Company.

    Americans need to be vigilant with dangerous “Young Turks” like Peter Orszag and Rahm Emanuel running the Obama White House and the U.S. budget.

    http://www.bollyn.info/home/articles/polphil/rahm-emanuel-and-barack-obama/====/


  17. @Adrian

    Hopefully one of our resident economist/accountants will give us an analysis of this situation. What we know is they have an issued share capital of over 180 million shares, 55% of that at market value, do the math. A little too rich for our household to calculate.

    Maybe the government will be looking to buy some of the shares.

    On the issue of page ranking as we have written before we try to not discuss stats 🙂 What we will say is that we continue to grow and a spurt in growth has been noticeable in the last 2 weeks compounded by the Rihanna searches.


  18. “Still, these crazy bald heads!”:.. Bob Marley
    @ David: Hopefully one of our resident economist/accountants will give us an analysis of this situation. What we know is they have an issued share capital of over 180 million shares, 55% of that at market value do the math. Maybe the government will be looking to buy some of the shares.

    @Adrian: X, your whole argument rest on the opinion that market rates for BNB shares will be high. I am questioning this opinion, given the world economy, and the fact that CL the current owner is in no position to play hardball. I would think that now is the opportune time to buy back BNB. Tell me why I am wrong?

    Adrian, the BOLD statement by the PM’s of his intention to BUY back BNB indicates an eagerness, poker players would love him! This speaks to David’s calculation above. People need to understand Accounting has changed. People who think they can purchase a company using the previous year’s Balance Sheet are sadly mistaken, not even by the Quarterly statements. You have got to do forensic accounting; Equity has been sucked out of ALL companies. Quote: “Even the banks are zombies!”

    @Green Monkey: “Speaking of Iceland’s economic crisis and political turmoil, here is an interesting coincidence.”

    @David: We have known for a long time that Barbadians have become fat and it has let in complacency. Maybe 700 people going home on the Four Seasons project will jolt some of us into a new reality.
    David, here is a story of KSF, financiers of that project and possible answer; “Maybe 700 people going home….” “Liquidation of the collapsed Kaupthing, Singer and Friedlander bank has been averted for a third time.
    A court hearing has been adjourned until April 9 to allow final details to be added to the Manx government’s proposed Scheme of Arrangement, seen by some as preferable to a winding-up of the bank.
    In court today, depositors found out more about the Treasury scheme, which aims to repay small depositors more quickly.
    Deputy Deemster Andrew Corlett said he had concerns about the timescale but had no doubt the scheme would be of the highest quality.”
    Here’s the link: http://www.manxradio.com/newsread.aspx?id=33328


  19. Thanks Marlehole, Anthony Johnson has been quoted in the media saying very much the same thing. The future earning potential of BNB will have to be given serious study if and when negotiations start on a BNB repurchase.


  20. David and Marlehole I am not sure what position you both are taking on the potential repurchase of BNB.

    Marlehole seems to be suggesting that whatever price CL says BNB is worth may not be the case,….that it might be lower?

    David seems to be saying that CL will look at future earnings potential and not current market price for BNB?

    You guys seem agree yet my take on your comments suggest a divide!!!


  21. Adrian all we saying is that this will be about negotiating the best deal. The TT government will want market price but other factors will come into play. We have asked the accountants and financial analysts in the BU family to explore the intricacies of this possible deal.


  22. The problem is that current market prices will reflect the value that privitization has created. The Trinis have cleaned up and made more efficient what was a poorly run Government owned bank.

    My hypothesis is that taking it back into Govt control will cause this value to disappear as workers adopt previous habits and as executives are driven by political rather than economic reasons.


  23. @ X I have to agree with you BUT I would STILL LIKE BNB to be owned by Barbados but you have a DAMN good point!


  24. @Adrian: David and Marlehole I am not sure what position you both are taking on the potential repurchase of BNB. Marlehole seems to be suggesting that whatever price CL says BNB is worth may not be the case,….that it might be lower?

    David seems to be saying that CL will look at future earnings potential and not current market price for BNB?
    You guys seem to agree. Yet, my take on your comments suggest a divide!!!

    We are in agreement! I, like “X” and JC can argue the merits/demerits for repurchase of Barbados National Bank, but that’s political and I am not going to be drawn into that at this time. The operative word is “might.” I like most of you because of one tenant in our anthem “Pride” will love to see BNB repurchased by the Government, but that ought not to be what drives the transaction. As by the PM’s statement, in today’s market “The True Value is hidden” and that is not a good strategy.

    He is the precedent for what I am saying. On 9/15/2008; “Acquiring one of the premier wealth management, capital markets, and advisory companies is a great opportunity for our shareholders,” Bank of America Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Ken Lewis said in a statement. “Together, our companies are more valuable because of the synergies in our businesses.”
    Under terms of the transaction, Bank of America would exchange 0.8595 shares of Bank of America common stock for each Merrill Lynch common share, the statement said.
    The deal values Merrill at $29 a share. That represents a 70 percent premium over the brokerage’s Friday closing price of $17.05, but well below what Merrill was worth at its peak in early 2007, when its shares traded above $98.

    12 months earlier Bank of America‘s Ken Lewis saw even Greater Value and wanted to buy Merrill Lynch sooo badly was willing to pay over $100.00/share, that when he saw it at $29, he was beside himself and saw it as a bargain. Some bargain uhh, MER stock closed yesterday under $12/share. There is your “Might”!!


  25. It will cost GOB $600 million to repatriate BNB from Trinidad. I like the idea of reasserting our financial independence. But can we afford it?


  26. @Anonymous immediately above, can you tell us how you got that frightening number?


  27. Republic’s BNB stake worth US$300 million
    Published: February 20th, 2009

    Barbados will be required to pay T&T interests an estimated US$300 million if the Caribbean neighbour is serious about purchasing the 65 per cent stake of the Barbados National Bank held by Republic Bank, according to calculations done following an expression of interest by Barbadian Prime Minister David Thompson.

    Finance Minister Karen Nunez-Tesheira and Central Bank governor Ewart Williams both confirmed yesterday that there had been strong interest by the international investors in buying the Republic Bank shares which have come under Government’s control as a result of its bailout of the CL Financial group. Nunez-Tesheira and Williams were responding to reports that Thompson had expressed an interest in negotiating with the T&T government to buy back the 65 per cent controlling interest in the Barbados National Bank held by Republic Bank. “The disposition of the Republic Bank shares is getting very active consideration and all of the various factors are now being considered,” said Nunez-Tesheira.

    She said work was being done towards coming to a resolution of the issue of the sale of the shares, adding: “At the end of day, we want to make sure the decisions we make are the right decisions for the people of T&T. Republic Bank owns about 96 million BNB shares. The stock traded on the Barbados Stock Exchange at a price of $6.30 on Thursday, making the entire BNB block worth Bds$605 million or about US$300 million. The Barbados government must talk to this country’s government because the Central Bank is holding in trust the 55 per cent of Republic Bank owned by CL Financial, following the bailout of the Lawrence Duprey-controlled group.

    Nunez-Tesheira said yesterday that “no approach has been made” by the Government about the proposal by the Barbados administration to take back control of BNB. She said that the T&T government was “looking at what was in the best interest of the country. At the end of the day, we want to ensure that the decision we make is the right decision, is well-considered and well thought out and in the best national interest.” Thompson said Barbados will be seeking to buy, at the current market rate, controlling interest in BNB. According to the Barbados Nation, while he did not give a specific date when he would be meeting with the government of Trinidad, Thompson said it would be “whenever the opportunity arises and I am pretty certain that it will be soon.”

    He said Government was also looking for any joint ventures in the effort, including that of credit unions or local business, to reclaim BNB. “I think that any economic or financial instability in the region . . . causes people to look inwardly and become more reactionary and more protective of their own space. “We have to avoid that and we have to get people to think of our space as a collective space because we are so intertwined. Now having said that, one might ask why we want back BNB?” Speaking yesterday, Williams said: “There are lots of people who want to buy the Republic Bank shares.”

    Link : http://guardian.co.tt/business/business/2009/02/21/republic-s-bnb-stake-worth-us300-million


  28. Considering BNB are the financiers of the highway extension, $600m may be a good price to pay to get that dabet under GOB control again.
    But as already has been posted, keep politics and local interests out of the management.

    New board, professional bankers, not the existing placemen.


  29. Would someone please explain to Bush Tea why we would even consider paying anything more that a token price for BNB?

    All the Barbados Government needs to do is to start a new bank or buy a small cheaper one, and transfer all its business from BNB to that new bank – called something like the National Commercial Bank of Barbados.

    If Republic then wants to operate BNB and can attract enough business to do so – all hail to them.

    In any case, I am still waiting to hear details of the MOU related to the ABC expansion, where BNB funded 3S to the tune of hundreds of millions.
    Exactly who is going to pay that money back again?

    What worth what $600 Million what!????

  30. Rev. Dr. Dick Hertz Avatar
    Rev. Dr. Dick Hertz

    but didn’t the BLP administration leave the treasury empty?


  31. Dr My Dick Hertz:

    You not know how much a country can borrow when its friends have “troubled assets”?

  32. Rev Dr Dick Hertz Avatar

    OH Straight Talk

    sorry your dick “hertz”…LOL but explain these “troubled assets” or is it “troubled asses”? and what now for the QEH ?(a year has passed nothing has changed).


  33. I hope that now Four Seasons Hotel has been bailed out that Thompson included a clause in his bailout contract-that no Guyanese are to be employed on that project. Employment should be for Bajans in these tough times.


  34. Who says that Four Seasons has been bailed out?

    By whom?

    When?

    How much?

    Where?


  35. In March of 2003, Republic Bank Limited (RBL) was successful in its bid to acquire 57 per cent of the shares of Barbados National Bank Inc. (BNB) from the Government of Barbados. On Wednesday July 16, 2003 the signing of the Sale and Purchase Agreement took place between The Rt. Honourable Owen Arthur, Prime Minister of Barbados and Ronald F. deC. Harford, Chairman and Managing Director of Republic Bank. The transaction was completed on July 31st 2003.
    In September 2003, RBL acquired a further 7,807,561 ordinary shares increasing their share holding from 57% to 65.13%.

    Last trading on BNB shares took place Nov 2008. Now during the time that BNB was sold it’s share price was about 1.80… There is no way that the GoB should pay 6.30 a share for BNB. BNB should resume trading on the exchange so that we can get a current price value.


  36. Adrian H isn’t it the Republic shares which are for sale in Trinidad? Whoever buys those shares get the controlling interest in BNB.


  37. Thompy and Owen are on the same page regarding “stimulus packages” Mia still wants to know when the Gob is going to put one in place.

    [quote]
    As Arthur sees it, “the present global crisis warrants a fundamental change in the institutions for global economic governance”, he argued, concluding that “it is to enter the theatre of the absurd to believe that structured defects of the existing magnitude can be corrected merely by adding a stimulus to existing activity. . . .”

    Later came his verbal swipe at a perceived CARICOM “inertia” that “now seems to have invaded our region”.

    This inertia, according to Arthur, who played a sustained high profile role as CARICOM head with lead responsibility for CSME-readiness arrangements, “has most profoundly taken the form of the virtual suspension of the programme to create the CARICOM Single Economy . . . .

    “We have lost a year,” he said, and warned that “the consequences for the region are and will be adverse, as can be illustrated by reference to the current situation that has evolved in the region’s financial sector . . . .”

    Those are certainly not words of music to the ears of former political colleagues and opponents currently running governments across our Caribbean community. Some of them may well resent the scenario he has presented. Question is whether Arthur is right or wrong?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading