Personal attention of
Officer-in-Charge Consumer Protection Division
Fair Trading Commission
re: 3/12/4 (648) Opera Interactive (Barbados) Ltd
Thank you for your letter dated 27th November 2007 and delivered by hand yesterday (3rd December). As a consumer, I am afraid I find its contents totally unacceptable.
In your letter dated 14th November 2007 you gave the written assurance that Opera Interactive (Barbados) Limited had provided you with a list of ‘winners’ and that you had contacted these ‘winners’ by phone and after contacting them had indeed confirmed they were ‘bone fide’ and ‘they had received their prizes’. You also stated ‘the names of the winners of its competition will be published in the media’. You are now stating that the company has agreed that ‘from the next Competition in any of the media we (Opera Interactive (Barbados) Ltd) will publish a weekly announcement of all prize winners’.
Why are you so reluctant to enforce your first ruling on this company, where you state that they should be more ‘be more transparent and publicize the winners of its competition in the media’?
Again, despite the assurances you obtained, yet again on Saturday 1st December 2007 a half page ‘ad’ appeared in the Saturday Sun without the competition operator’s name. In the last paragraph of your letter 27th November 2007, you pointed out ‘The Commission shall only investigate a complaint made a against a service provider or business enterprise where a complainant satisfies the Commission that he has submitted a complaint to the service provider or business enterprise and has failed to obtain reasonable redress’.
As repeatedly pointed out, how would a consumer contact this company?
No address is shown in any of the advertising and in many cases no operator has been shown either. The company also operates the Caribbean Phone Idol competition and asks people to write to it, on its website, but no address is shown. The FTC also allowed the company to advertise frequently on television and in print media ‘ads’ for several days where a listed telephone number was not in operation.
So I am afraid the blame cannot be passed back to the consumer. This company has consistently lied about its operations and the FTC appears happy to allow it to operate on Barbados blatantly breaking your own rules. I sincerely, believe no further advertising should be permitted until a full list of ‘winners’ is published. I would remind the Commission that for several weeks the same ‘winning number’ has appeared in all advertising. As consumers, are we expected to believe that there have been several ‘winners’ all choosing the same number?
4th December 2007
Adrian when will this end?
Pingback: Countries News » Blog Archive » Opera Interactive Barbados In The News Again
I think it will not end until the FTC actually takes some action.
Why met with a director of the company, agreed a number of conditions including confirming ‘the names of the winners of its competition WILL BE published in the media’ and then a few days later state they will print the ‘winners’ names starting with the next competition?
‘They (FTC) said company (Opera Interactive (Barbados) Limited also provided the Commission with the names, addresses and telephone numbers of its competition winners’.
‘The Commission telephoned those persons indentified on the list as winners to confirm that they were authentic’.
‘Our telephone enquiries revealed that the winners were bona fide winners of Opera Interactive (Barbados) Limited competition and that they had received their prizes’.
So the FTC has the list of ‘winners’ but cannot get Opera Interactive (Barbados) Limited to publish it.
Simple solution, the FTC publsihes the list themselves.
Its called consumer protection and they receive taxpayers funds to DO EXACTLY that!
Adrian Loveridge cannot be trusted
Pingback: Nation Newspaper Forced To Publish Statement On The Lucky Number Competition~Winners Promised Soon «