image-thumb.pngWe have accepted the suggestion from a BU family member to facilitate discussion on medical matters which is a topic area that should interest us all. Based on exchanges with and between BU family members posted over time, many of you work in the medical field or possess information on various medical issues acquired based on personal circumstance or otherwise. Medical Corner seeks to encourage ANYONE to submit views on medical experiences, new developments in the industry or any related matter which readers feel can serve to educate the BU family.

New Page Added

583 responses to “Medical Corner”


  1. One wonders how ordinary people are expected to navigate the mountain of information to be able to make informed decisions. Who to trust?


  2. De Boss ponders…
    “One wonders how ordinary people are expected to navigate the mountain of information to be able to make informed decisions. Who to trust?”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Is the blog master FINALLY beginning to grasp the hopelessness of our present predicament?
    LOL…
    Who exactly qualifies as ‘ordinary people’? Do you mean the hoards of brass bowls whose measure of success in life is to have a ‘job’ (IE to be a servant of some other brass bowl)

    What ‘mountain of information’ is that Boss? The loads of PROPAGANDA pushed by special interest groups – which are ALL controlled by the greedy albino-centric forces?

    What is an ‘informed decision Boss?’ besides the lotta shiite ideas that we have all been eddykated and brainwashed to accept – IN SPITE OF THE ONGOING AND WORSENING results that we are seeing.

    Hear THIS!!!
    The ONLY reliable ‘mountain of information’ that can possibly exists, MUST have originated from the CREATOR of this experience that we call ‘Life on Earth’.
    Everything else is shiiiite…. or at least smelly.

    ‘INFORMED DECISIONS’ that ignore, or that are ignorant of, the INTENT and OBJECTIVES of the CREATOR – are nothing but jobby to be FLUSHED… or at least ‘shiite-talk’ suitable for the rum shop and Laff-it-off.

    Bottom Line…
    Our World is now RUN by EVIL SPIRITUAL FORCES – mostly via their albino-centric human agents, and by their petty brass bowl wannabes.

    Trust ANYTHING and ANYONE at your peril. This applies to your medical, physical – BUT ESPECIALLY SPIRITUAL well being. (Wise BBs know that we battle NOT against flesh and blood, BUT against wicked spiritual forces in high places)

    The ONLY reliable point of TRUST lies in the words, the laws, and in the LOVE of the CREATOR.

    Whether Pacha likes it or not… 🙂
    Whether it suites our academic jokers’ mock theses or not..
    THIS is the ever present REALITY of 2024.

    Wunna keep on playing dat wunna don’t know….

    What a place
    What a curse
    What a time to be alive…


  3. @Bush Tea

    You too unfair. Ordinary people should be able to trust public medical professionals.


  4. Questions and Answers with new chief chief executive officer of the Queen Elizabeth Hospital

    QEH CHECK- CHECK-LIST

    The Sunday Sun recently sat down with British-born medical health administrator Neil Clark, the man who is now in the hot seat as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Queen Elizabeth Hospital.

    Clark started the job exactly two months ago and shared with The Nation’s Associate Editor Barry Alleyne some of his ideas for making the hospital a much more efficiently run organisation.

    Q: What were your expectations when you took this job?

    A: I was expecting to come to a hospital that needed some improvements. And I’m excited to come to a health care system where you have one hospital that provides the majority of services for the whole population. I’m excited to be here.

    Q: What were your first priorities after taking the job? A: I’ve spent the first two months meeting the directors and the clinical leads (heads of departments). There are 40 departments at this hospital, so it’s a complex organisation. We could have up to 5 000 different clinical treatments to be dealt with at the same time. It’s probably the most complex organisation in Barbados.

    Q: What is your first expectation? A: I hope to make this hospital a sustainable, safe serviceprovider for the population. I’ve been meeting and listening to people. I’ve tried my hardest in the first two months not to offer opinions or views, but to gather as much information as I can and understand people’s perspectives. It’s important to get that local context.

    Q: How quickly do you think you can make the necessary changes based on your observations? A: It’s going to take time. I’m quite happy so far with the medical personnel I’ve come across. People seem enthusiastic and motivated.

    Q: What are some of the concerns or comments you have been hearing from the people you’ve met with? A: Most of the people I’ve met have ideas about what they need to move forward. What I need to work out, is how I can bring in change-management teams to help them make those changes, gather the information to put a plan in place and to monitor it. Everyone knows what needs to happen, but they just haven’t been able to make it happen. That’s where I come in. to

    are resources 2 wants improvement. leaning

    I the want She’s the on what Emergency A& we train cyber need numbers Q: Will you need to bring in more people to effect those changes?

    A: Those people are probably here already. There are nearly 2 500 staff, and I already asked the human resources department, how do we find from the 2 500 staff who wants to have a new challenge, who wants to have a change and be involved in service improvement.

    Q: Which members of your team are you leaning on so far?

    A: I’ve already asked my chief operating officer and I want her to really focus over the next year, on both the service quality, and the patient flow agenda. We want to avoid the waiting times we’re seeing now.

    She’s done a great job over the last year managing the hospital, but now I’m here, I want her to focus on this. This is our number one thing.

    Q: What staffing ideas do you have for what would lead to an improved Accident & Emergency Department?

    A: If we are going to bring in a new IT system for A& E, we have to have the IT infrastructure. Then we will need more IT personnel. We will also need to train people how to use it. We need to shore up our cyber security and our data protection so we will need experts to support those functions.

    Q: What immediate improvement to staffing numbers do you envisage?

    A: It’s all about efficiency. If we have less people on the wards, I might not need more nurses. It’s too early for me to conclude how much more staff we need. We are doing some work with human resources about the current staff levels, and the ratios, and just how much staff would we need. We have to figure out are we 100 per cent staffed, and what vacancies we need filled.

    Q: How soon do you think new nurses would be needed for the QEH?

    A: There have been additional nurses requested. We are going to try and bring nurses from Ghana and the Philippines. Knowing what those numbers are, and where they will be deployed is equally important.

    I’ve set up a weekly meeting where we look at things like that.

    Q: Have you paid special attention to staffing in the A& E Department?

    A: We’re working with A& E to figure out if we have enough numbers to manage the flow of patients. We need the right numbers at the right times. We will also look at the staffing on the wards. After that we can identify how to make the operation more efficient.

    Q: How do you plan to reduce the amount of deferred or cancelled surgical procedures Barbadians have been experiencing?

    A: We have to look at the utilisation of our (operating) theatres. Are we using them effectively?

    Are we only using them 50 per cent of the time? We have to look at everything, at what time an operation starts, what time it finishes. That would give us more information so we can deliver improved services.

    Q: What are the plans for non medical-health services?

    A: For all the other support services, the work has started. I’ve met the engineering team, the HR team, and the admin team. They too need to feel engaged and involved in how the hospital’s services are delivered. It all impacts on patient care. All of them need to be fully engaged. Everyone will know what their expectations are.

    Q: What are your initial plans for cybersecurity at the QEH?

    A: I’m aware of the cyber security attack the hospital had. I’m also aware an implementation plan has been put in place to strengthen the security. Part of the recruitment process that has been approved, is for a cybersecurity officer, who will be completely responsible for that. We recognise cybersecurity isn’t just about people trying to hack. It’s also about people who work here, and probably offering out information. Part of the role isn’t just the technical aspect, but also educating everyone who works here, that when you see an email from someone you don’t know, that you don’t open it. I expect our IT system to try to phish our own staff, and to tell them, you failed.

    A lot of this will be about education, and doing it internally so there is no harm done when someone makes a mistake.

    Source: Nation


  5. Barbados ‘can do more cancer research’

    By Tony Best

    It is within Barbados’ “grasp” to play a greater international role in scientific research efforts to boost global understanding of the cancer picture for Black people in the Caribbean, US, Britain and elsewhere.

    Any scientific success can raise the early detection rates of cancers in Bajan men and women at a pace that would reduce the non-communicable disease’s morbidity and mortality in and out of the region and the rest of the Hemisphere.

    So said Dr Ken Harewood, a highly respected Bajan cancer researcher in the US who has spent decades as a leading scientist in laboratories of one of the world’s leading multinational pharmaceutical firms before he switched to full-time teaching and administration on university campuses in New York, Florida and North Carolina.

    “It is within our scientific grasp in Barbados to achieve that desirable goal,” asserted Dr Harewood, a retired bio-chemistry professor. “We have the institutions in Barbados and the skilled professionals there. What is lacking is the money” to get the job done.

    “It takes a lot of money to do the kinds of research the American Cancer Society has available to it and which it plans to spend on an extensive study of breast cancer in Black women in the US,” added Dr Harewood. “You need skilled personnel.

    “You need equipment and supplies as well as a dedicated team of researchers to conduct the studies, generate the data, interpret it and recommend courses of action,” he said.

    “Barbados has been talking recently about becoming a mecca for pharmaceutical manufacturing and if that manufacturing capacity materialises then you would have the perfect setting where you have University of the West Indies scientists conducting the research,” he added.

    “You would have the university setting in Barbados, where you would have scientists working with clinicians at the major hospital (Queen Elizabeth Hospital) and oncologists who can conduct the same studies that have been conducted in major metropolitan centres in the US and the UK,” he contended.

    “It is within our grasps (in Barbados). We have the patient pool to do it. If you have that pool, you already have the skills of scientists” then you could can move forward, said Dr Harewood. “Barbados can then compete for research funding in the US and elsewhere. There is no reason to believe that we cannot take on the task of conducting our own epidemiological studies and use the findings to achieve results,” he stated.

    Lowest survival rate

    The retired science professor was reacting to the American Cancer Society’s decision to conduct what might turn out to be the largest national study of its kind designed to solve a mystery that surrounds cancer: Why Black women have the lowest survival rate of any racial or ethnic group in the US for most cancers?

    Thanks to new medicines and better detection, cancer deaths in the US have been declining since a peak in 1991, but Black women there have the highest death rate for most cancers, the Society was quoted as saying.

    “The racial differences are especially stark with certain types of cancer, research shows,” stated CNN, a major cable news network in the US but has a global audience of millions.

    The news about the Cancer Society’s elaborate study hit the international headlines last month when the results of an extensive cancer study of Black female cancer victims in Barbados, Africa, and the US were published.

    The study’s results showed that twelve breast cancer genes identified in Black women may, in the words of Nancy Lapid of Reuters news agency, “one day help better predict their (Black women’s) risks for the disease and heighten potential risk difference for women of European descent.”

    The findings were drawn from more than 40 000 women of African descent including 8 034 with breast cancer.

    At a time when improved medicines are bolstering the early detection of cancers and life spans are being prolonged, Black women are still lagging behind women of European descent.

    According to published accounts by CNN and other leading news organisations and medical publications, women of colour who are equally likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer are almost 40 per cent more likely to die from the disease than white women. Black men in the US who are being diagnosed with prostate cancer are also said to be suffering a similar fate.

    How come? Dr Harewood, a reputable and respected Bajan researcher who has spent decades in research laboratories of a major US multinational pharmaceutical company before switching to the classrooms of different universities pinpointed some causes for the wide gap in the outcomes of cancers in ethnic minorities.

    That picture, Dr Harewood told the Sunday Sun yesterday from his home in North Carolina where he once headed the North Carolina Central University’s Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Institute, could be traced to a plethora of causes: a paucity of scientific research studies in minority neighbourhoods whose results can bolster understanding and awareness of the disease; blatant racism; and a lack of inclusion of Black women in the clinical trials conducted at major US medical centres.

    Source: Nation


  6. Re Cancer Research:

    Oncologist Dr. William Makis of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (out of favour with medical authorities as he came out early on with concerns the mRNA COVID19 vaccines would likely be unsafe and refused to endorse them to his patients) has been looking into some early studies which show that well established, inexpensive, off-patent, proven safe over years of use medicines and even nutritional supplements had potential to be repurposed as possible cancer treatment options.

    Of course, big-pharma corporations are not interested in promoting the use of any inexpensive treatments that will compete with their expensive, patented treatments and will be sure to use their money and influence to keep the inexpensive treatment options off the table as much as possible.

    Since medications have to go through a series of extensive and expensive Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) before they can be promoted commercially as a viable treatment option for any disease, funds for funding large scale medical trials of inexpensive medications or unpatentable nutritional substances as cancer treatment options (or for any other diseases) are usually difficult to come by.

    See the links below for just some of the relevant articles from Dr. Makis’s substack page.

    IVERMECTIN and CANCER Part 2 – Treating Turbo Cancer – 7 new studies released in 2024 show Ivermectin works against CANCER – suggested PROTOCOLS for COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers

    FENBENDAZOLE and CANCER – at least 12 Anti-Cancer mechanisms of action. Not approved by FDA. Cheap. Safe. Kills aggressive cancers. Why no Clinical Trials? Nine research papers reviewed.

    CHLORINE DIOXIDE and CANCER – Most Controversial Alternative Cancer Treatment – Safety and New Research evidence in 8 papers examined

    NONI Fruit and CANCER – Morinda citrifolia (Noni) as an Anti-cancer superfood – New Research – 5 papers reviewed

    CURCUMIN and CANCER – New Research in the past 4 years – 5 papers including a look at improving bioavailability

    IP6 and CANCER – Inositol Hexaphosphate and the latest Research since 2020

    FASTING and CANCER – New Research on a potential Revolution in Cancer Treatment – What’s best? Periodic fasting (3 days) vs Ketogenic Diet vs Caloric Restriction – 5 major papers reviewed!

    QUERCETIN and CANCER – New research of the past 4 years – 5 papers reviewed


  7. UK’s Office for Nationals Statistics (ONS) admits to massive screwup in stats used to show C19 vax safety.

    Story in a nutshell. The UKs ONS was responsible for making statistical calculations around death rates after the C19 vaccines rolled out in 2021 to show they were safe or possibly unsafe.

    After the the ONS stats came out for 2021, it was noted that there was a signifiant jump in the death rates for the UN-vaccinated group. Why were the unvaccinated dying in abnormally high number (and without COVID), and this was also co-incident with the rollout of the C19 experimental vaccines? Could it be that the ONS were for some reason shifting some vaccinated deaths into the unvaccinated category, making the unvaccinated group deaths unusually high and artificially making the post C19 vax deaths to be unnaturally low?

    The ONS was challenged by some independent researchers on this strange coincidence and asked if the statistics could possibly have been thrown off by a mis-categorization of some vaccinated deaths as unvaccinated deaths. The ONS denied this was at all possible, and rebuffed each inquiry about the matter with a blanket assurance that their stats didn’t lie. They counted strictly unvaccinated deaths only in the unvaccinated category.

    Within the last few weeks, the ONS has had to eat their words and admit that indeed they screwed up big-time, because, as some had long suspected, they had indeed been counting some vaccinated deaths as unvaccinated deaths which had the effect of making the vaccines appear to be safer than they really were.

    We were right! The UK ONS now admit that deaths in the vaccinated were categorised as unvaccinated in 2021
    The ONS denied it then but admit it now.

    NORMAN FENTON, MARTIN NEIL, CLARE CRAIG, AND 4 OTHERS
    MAY 23, 2024

    In 2021 when the UK ONS (Office for National statistics) started releasing its vaccine by mortality status reports we exposed that there were large spikes in the non-covid death rates in the ‘unvaccinated’. These spikes in mortality coincided with the first main vaccine rollout and did so for each age group (see this report, for example).

    Here is the chart for non-covid mortality rates in weeks 1-38 of 2021 for the 60-69 age groups: (Graph in original)

    The charts for the other age groups looked much the same.

    We asserted that these obvious anomalies were a result of the standard ONS procedure of categorising anyone within 20 days of their first dose as ‘unvaccinated’. However, in our own discussions with the ONS they maintained that, although that method was used for their efficacy calculations, it was not used when it came to mortality. They clearly said that a person dying any time after vaccination was correctly categorised, as a vaccinated death, in the mortality data they regularly released to the public and which formed the basis of a massive public communication campaign encouraging vaccination.

    SNIP

    As a result of a subject access request that Clare Craig submitted to the ONS we have now found out that we were correct after all!

    Clare has posted on this twitter/X thread, an internal ONS email confirming that the NIMS database of vaccinated people, that the ONS relied upon, had excluded those people who had died before vaccine records had been sent back to the central system:

    When we pointed out to the ONS exactly this possibility for miscategorisation in 2021 they continued to deny that it had happened (see Table 8 of our report here).

    Why is this so important? Because the ONS data – possibly more so than any other source of data in the world – was used to bolster the claim that the vaccines were highly effective and safe.

    And, as we have always argued, and which is now certain, any claims of efficacy and safety based on their data were completely illusionary and subject to the cheap trick of miscategorisation whereby even a placebo – or something even worse – could be ‘shown’ to be safe and effective.

    https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/we-were-right-the-uk-ons-now-admit


  8. US appeals court rules COVD19 jabs were NOT vaccines. Therefore mandates were illegal. Opens up possibilities for lawsuits aginst vaccine companies (in spite of indemnity provisions to protect the vaccine makers) and criminal prosecution against the wrong doers who tried to push them on US citizens and residents.

    VIDEO – Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson and Dr.David Martin – 9th Circuit Court rules COVID-19 mRNA Injections are not “Vaccines”

    https://makismd.substack.com/p/video-absolute-truth-with-emerald?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=1385328&post_id=145528321&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=o3ikk&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email


  9. et ready, COVID-19 V2 coming soon in the form of the Bird Flu plandemic. Naturally mRNA vaccines will be the government sanctioned option and appropriate therapeutics will probably be banned as they did with HCQ and Ivermectin in Plandenmic V1, AKA COVID-19


  10. Youtube has censored the video I posted about the coming plans to use Bird Flu as the source for PLANDEMIC V2 requiring another mRNA vaccine emergency rollout. Here is a link to the same video on the Free Speech video platform Rumble:

    https://rumble.com/v51goza-hang-on-bill-gates-is-now-doing-what-with-bird-flu-redacted-w-natali-and-cl.html


  11. Japanese Neuroscientist Alarmed at Explosive Dementia Surge Amongst COVID Vaccinated Individuals: Massive Study of ~600,000 Reveals

    This is the topic of a recent post on X: https://x.com/_aussie17/status/1802901646911144313

    Highlights:
    This paper was recently published. There has been talk about the relationship between dementia and the COVID vaccine, so they investigated this in South Korea. They examined a very large number of people. They examined a very large number of people – 550,000 people. 550,000 people. And they limited it to those who received two doses of the vaccine. And then, after one month, two months, three months, they analyzed all the data.

    Mild dementia. It’s the precursor stage before dementia. It’s the precursor stage before dementia. This had doubled. Among vaccinated individuals compared to non-vaccinated individuals. This is significant. And this is after three months. After three months. And the number of people who developed dementia or Alzheimer’s disease increased by over 20%.

    Link to the Scientific Paper:A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of alzheimer’s disease


  12. 5 US States now suing Pfizer over C19 JAB BALLSUP/FIASCO. More states likely to follow. Don’t worry Moderna, J&J, your turn will come in due course.

    Why Are 5 STATES SUING PFIZER and NOT Moderna?
    Pfizer researched and developed their COVID-19 mRNA injections independent of the Operation Warp Speed program while demanding to maintain ownership and control of their human safety data.

    KAREN KINGSTON
    JUN 19, 2024

    June 18, 2024: Yesterday, Attorney General Kris Kobach broke the news that 4 other states will be joining Kansas in suing Pfizer for willfully concealing, suppressing, and/or omitting material evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of their mRNA injections.

    Per the lawsuit, the Big pharma giant conspired with individuals from Health & Human Services, the media, universities, social media platforms, and other businesses and organization in order to manipulate the American people into receiving an injection that they would have otherwise declined if Pfizer had accurately disclosed their COVID-19 mRNA clinical data and adverse events reports to the public and US government.

    More:
    https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/why-are-5-states-suing-pfizer-and


  13. What is the role the FDA in all of this post Covid 19 mess?


  14. What is the role the FDA in all of this post Covid 19 mess?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “Duck and cover their behinds..”.

    Same applies to authorities on the rock of brass….


  15. Revelations from one of my favorite Canadian scientists, Dr Laura Braden PhD

    A recent newsletter from Canadian MD Dr Mark Trozzi:

    Dr. Laura Braden has two science degrees: one in cellular and molecular biology and one in neuroscience. She also holds a PhD in Biology and Molecular Immunology; and two post-doctoral fellowships: one in pathology and microbiology and one in immunology.

    During the 2023 National Citizens Inquiry hearings in Toronto, Dr Braden delivered an exceptional presentation that exposed in detail the destructive criminal covid agenda that was carried out against Canadians.

    This molecular biologist has deep insider knowledge and experience in the Canadian scientific and academic culture, which is funded and influenced by Big Pharma.

    In 2021, Dr Braden refused to be injected with the C-19 genetic experiments that were forced into Canadians. Like so many good Canadians, she was unlawfully ejected from her university research laboratory and academic work.

    In addition to the lies of COVID-19, Dr Braden became aware of the reckless and dangerous practices of Big Pharma and the government when she asked simple questions of her local public health nurse regarding vaccines that she was being encouraged to have injected into her own children. This initiated her deep reevaluation of contemporary medical science, which started her on a new path of independent research.

    By poring through medical literature, Dr Braden has been identifying molecules with powerful medicinal and healing properties. She has looked for sources of these medicinal molecules within both natural flora, as well as plants that she and her team can grow where she lives on Prince Edward Island.

    Dr. Braden’s discoveries have been profound. In addition to growing and harvesting medicinal plants, she has constructed a laboratory where she isolates and concentrates medicinal molecules. She is producing tinctures and concentrates with profound healing properties.

    In this interview, Dr Braden reveals natural remedies that big pharma does not want you to know about. May Dr Braden’s insights help you and your family live free of disease, while achieving optimal health. Her humor and philosophical insights are also priceless.

    Click the link and arrow down to see the video interview with Dr. Laura Braden. Has some very interesting content on the medicinal properties of various types of mushrooms. Also other useful links underneath the video:

    https://www.drtrozzi.news/p/big-pharma-does-not-want-you-to-see


  16. Deadly medicines and organised crime: How big pharma has corrupted healthcare is the self-explanatory title of a 2013 book by Peter C. Gøtzsche, a medical doctor who is also a former pharma insider.

    Below is a link to a review of the book posted on the USA’s National Institute of Health’s website.

    Reviewed by James Dickinson, MB BS CCFP PhD
    AUTHOR Peter C. Gøtzsche PUBLISHER Radcliffe Publishing, St Mark’s House, Shepherdess Walk, London, N17LH, United Kingdom TELEPHONE 0844 887 1380 WEBSITE http://www.radcliffehealth.com PUBLISHED 2013/310 pp/$50.50 OVERALL RATING Excellent STRENGTHS Comprehensive, with worldwide examples across many categories of drugs. It describes the history well, and is current WEAKNESSES Not always correctly referenced. Some arguments are simply the author’s personal views. Book could have benefited from a better editor AUDIENCE Physicians and interested members of the public

    The thesis of this book attracts attention: medicines are produced by organized crime syndicates. Peter Gøtzsche shows that the official definition of organized crime closely matches the activities of the largest drug companies. He lists each of them and shows that they have all been repeatedly convicted of marketing harmful—often fatal—drugs; substantial fraud; price manipulation; and concealment of evidence. The billions of dollars in fines levied against them for these offences pale in comparison to the profits they continue to make, so these convictions are merely the cost of doing business. It is not clear that convictions in the United States have had any effect in Canada or elsewhere in the world.

    Gøtzsche began his career as a drug representative who became a marketing manager. He then went to medical school and become an internist and clinical researcher. He is now the director of the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Copenhagen, Denmark. In his progress he has created controversies by questioning accepted wisdom.1,2

    He agrees that there are indeed many valuable drugs, but emphasizes that those are not his target. Such drugs need little promotion, as they sell themselves. His concern is with the rest: the “me, too” drugs that provide no benefit and those that are actively harmful. His book describes substantial flaws in the way that medical evidence is produced, and how it has become worse over the past 20 years as a result of more commercially oriented drug approval policies implemented with the intent of reducing delay in marketing. These changes have occurred primarily in the United States, but are echoed in the rest of the world. The consequence has been less critical review, less oversight, and less protection of the public, as Gøtzsche demonstrates with a host of examples. Perhaps the best example is oseltamivir, which has minimal (if any) value, many side effects, and on balance appears to have no place in the formulary at all. Yet Roche persuaded governments to stockpile it to halt the 2009 H1N1 influenza epidemic.

    Review continued here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046551/


  17. @ GreenMonkey, June 24, 2024 at 4:43 pm

    RE: “Peter Gøtzsche shows that the official definition of organized crime closely matches the activities of the largest drug companies.”

    It’s why mainstream medicine has also been called “psychopathic medicine” ruled and run and occupied by psychopaths … https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html

    “There are large numbers of scientists, doctors, and presstitutes who will sell out truth for money, such as those who describe people dropping dead on a daily basis as “rare” when it it happening all over the vaccinated world.” — Paul Craig Roberts, Ph.D., American economist & former US regime official, in 2024

    “Imagine a vaccine so safe you have to be threatened to take it.” — from a poster


  18. Pharma uses “pump and dump” schemes of stock market conmen for windfall profits from ineffetive vaccines/medicines.

    Pumping and Dumping Vaccines
    Dissecting the predatory business model we are all subjected to

    A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
    JUN 27, 2024

    PUMP AND DUMP

    Another common strategy for making money is to convince investors you have an incredibly valuable product that is being offered for much less than it’s worth, thereby pumping up the value of your stock, and then to sell (dump) your holdings in it before people realize it’s worthless and the value crashes. Because this works, it’s been done for a long time (e.g., since here’s an example from the early 1700s), and a variety of laws have been created that were designed to make this practice illegal. Nonetheless, it still persists. For example, here Dr. Malone concisely explains how this practice underlies a large part of the biotech and vaccine industry:

    (Embedded video here of Dr. Robert Malone’s explanation of Pharma’s profiteering from Pump and Dump)

    Briefly, Malone shares that once the public health authorities and then the media announce that a new “threat” is on the horizon, if a biotech company comes forward claiming they have the cure to it, their stock price will quickly balloon, allowing the company to quickly capture the investor’s money before the company’s value collapses (e.g., because the threat never materialized or their product doesn’t work). The key point is that since this is a tried and true business model, it happens a lot.

    Likewise, when a new vaccine is brought to market, in order to sell the public on it, the industry has to portray the vaccine as being the greatest thing imaginable—both so that it can attract investors to pump up the stock, but also so that it can attract members of the public to buy it. However, in most cases, those claims are false and they must be progressively back tracked as this becomes clear. This process is often referred to as “moving the goal posts”…..

    SNIP

    (In the source article a video without sound goes here and displays a montage of news media messaging showing the ropidly declining efficacy of the COVID vaccines over time)

    As Fauci’s montage showed, before long we learned the (COVID) vaccines had an inconvenient feature (which sadly was also something many of us who understood how vaccines worked had predicted)—over time their efficacy would wane…until eventually the vaccinated became more likely than the unvaccinated to catch COVID. This should have been a sign to stop the shots, but instead it was interpreted as a need for more boosters—something which only accelerated this downhill spiral.

    Similarly, I long suspected the claim the vaccines reduced hospitalizations and death from COVID was a lie, and instead simply another attempt to move the goal posts. This was because reduced deaths and hospitalizations was not a benefit shown in Pfizer’s original trial, we consistently saw COVID-19 mortality rates increase rather than decrease after COVID-19 vaccine campaigns, the above Cleveland clinic study (which showed multiple shots made one more likely rather than less likely to get COVID-19) and because vaccinated hospitalizations was actually a fairly easy metric to rig. For example, one could deliberately give the unvaccinated inferior care (something Dr. James Miller recently attested to witnessing). Likewise hospitals could falsely claim those who died from COVID-19 were unvaccinated, something I personally came across instances of and which multiple whistleblowers testified was built into the electronic medical record systems.

    Furthermore, many still do not know that another large dataset showed that much in the same way the vaccines’ efficacy against COVID-19 infections waned, their efficacy against deaths did as well.

    SNIP

    Most recently, a study came out, which clearly showed the vaccinated (once they reached the hospital) indeed had a higher risk of dying from COVID-19. However, since that went against the narrative, most people are not aware this study was done and we still hear the “vaccine saved lives” talking point from our politicians—despite the fact there was a large increase in excess deaths within America after the vaccines rolled out which correlated to the groups who received the vaccines.

    It is thus extraordinary to compare what our health authorities told us with what that the data actually showed.

    Full article with hyperlinks to documentation at:
    https://substack.com/home/post/p-145839216


  19. Russell Brand Slams Media for Normalizing Heart Attacks in Young, Healthy People

    Brand accused the mainstream media of making a concerted effort to normalize the recent surge in cardiac injuries, including heart attacks, in previously healthy people — while ignoring any possible connection to COVID-19 vaccines.

    by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

    Comedian and political commentator Russell Brand accused the mainstream media of making a concerted effort to normalize the recent surge in cardiac injuries, including heart attacks, in previously healthy people — while ignoring any possible connection to COVID-19 vaccines.

    “On legacy media, it’s quite possible to watch a kind of bright breezy, cheerful news item about heart attacks as if it’s like some new trend, as if it’s Pogs or Pokemon Go or something,” Brand said Tuesday on an episode of his “Stay Free” podcast. “It’s a new sensation, heart disease in young people.”

    Brand cited a May 30 segment on NBC’s “Today” show — “A new way of thinking about heart attacks” — which reported, “Doctors say they’re seeing an alarming number of seemingly healthy patients having heart attacks and those patients are getting younger and younger.”

    The report noted that “more than 10% of heart attack patients had no known risk factors, such as obesity or smoking.”

    According to “Today,” doctors at New York’s Mount Sinai Hospital are “tracking patients to see if they can uncover the new risk factors behind this trend” and “unravel the mystery of young heart attacks.”

    The report suggested several risk factors, including the obesity epidemic and “long-smoldering inflammation” — though Brand noted that “Today” didn’t suggest what might be causing the inflammation.

    “I’ve got an idea,” Brand said. “Type ‘mRNA,’ ‘spike protein cleavage site,’ ‘DARPA,’ ‘EcoHealth Alliance’ ‘NIH’” (National Institutes of Health) into your laptop or phone search bar.

    “Put in there, ‘Wuhan Institute of Virology,’” he said. “Put into your search engine, ‘Anthony Fauci,’ put ‘dual-purpose weapons research.’”

    More:
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/russell-brand-media-normalize-heart-attacks-young-people-covid-vaccines/

    Link above includes an embedded video (arrow down to bottom of the page) of Russel Brand mocking and criticizing the mainstream media and the medical establishment for purposely ignoring the obvious when it comes to investigating the reasons for a significant increase in young and apparently healthy people suffering from heart attacks after the C19 vaccine rollout.


  20. US vaccinology expert Dr. Stanley Plotkin admits vaccine testing protocols lack scientific rigor and are not of a sound enough basis to support claims by doctors, health practitioners, medical journals and medical authorities that all approved vaccines are generally “safe and effective.”

    Following is an excerpt from a recent substack post by US attorney Aaron Siri. In his substack post Attorney Siri comments on a new peer reviewed article in one of the world’s most prestigious medical journals, i.e. the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). In the NEJM article Dr. Plotkin and co-authors admit that current pre-licensure testing protocols for new vaccines are not rigorous enough. Furthermore, Dr Plotkin’s NEJM article also claims that, following release of a new vaccine, post-licensure studies are also lacking. These would be studies designed to identify issues or side-effects that might only become evident after some time has gone by and a vaccine has been released, distributed, and administered to the public at large.

    AND LIKE THAT, THE CLAIM VACCINES ARE THE WORLD’S BEST STUDIED PRODUCT DIES
    The world’s leading vaccinologist, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, and company have just capitulated…

    By AARON SIRI

    Wow. After decades of Dr. Stanley Plotkin and his vaccinologist disciples insisting vaccines are the most well studied products on the planet, they just penned an article admitting precisely the opposite.

    They just admitted vaccines are not properly studied—neither pre-licensure nor post-licensure. They admitted, for example, “prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes [and] follow-up durations” and that “there are not resources earmarked for postauthorization safety studies.”

    SNIP

    The problem is, it doesn’t work. It doesn’t work because, at bottom, there are no proper safety studies. So, there is no safety data to add to the FDA package inserts, and hiding harms by removing them from CDC inserts doesn’t make them go away. Parents and other adults don’t simply stop believing what they have seen with their own eyes because CDC, WHO, the Gates Foundations, etc., won’t acknowledge them, or worse, they attack them.

    That brings us to the present in which Plotkin and his disciples realize they can’t cast voodoo on the public. They can’t hide the truth. So, their only option is to try and co-op the truth they have lied about for decades by now admitting that the studies to show vaccines are safe do not exist. But in making that admission, they conveniently fail to admit that for decades they lied, gaslit, defrauded (and I don’t use that word lightly) the public by claiming that vaccines are probably the most thoroughly safety tested products on the planet and that people should rest assured, no stone on vaccine safety was left unturned.

    Thus, in their article just published, they pretend they never lied about vaccine safety. They pretend they are now just pointing out vaccine safety has never really been conducted, as if that was not known to them before.

    Don’t be fooled. Their real agenda is plain, and it is not to study vaccine safety, but rather to confirm that which they already believe. This is crystal clear from the fact that, while their article admits the studies have not been done, they write in the same breath that serious vaccine harms are “rare.” But if the studies have not been done, how do they know that? The answer is, they don’t, and they don’t care to know the truth. Their goal is to protect the products they have spent their careers defending and worshipping and that have brought them fame and riches.

    They also ignore the mountain of studies and data which already exist that clearly show serious vaccine harms. Just take a moment to review the large body of science around one of the adjuvants used in vaccines which multiple studies show can cause serious harm.

    Link to Siri’s article with embedded hyperlinks to Dr. Plotkin’s NEJM article and other supporting material:
    https://substack.com/home/post/p-146488873


  21. Again we should repeat the question- what is the role of FDA and other oversight bodies responsible for the good health of citizens?


  22. You can be cynically funny as Hell sometimes Boss…

    FDA and the ‘oversight authorities’ all now BELONG to the dark forces of EVIL… represented by Fauci and the WHO….
    If THAT is not obvious, then we all may as well just lay down and die….

    The REAL question that we SHOULD repeat is this…

    To what do we owe the fact that we have such comprehensive research on BU, compliments persons like GreenMonkey….?


  23. @Bush Tea

    Who must guard the guards?

    Too many citizens are happy to cede their rights and power to politicians. Now the tail is wagging the dog.

    #askwilliam


  24. “Bush Tea” would have us all drinking “Bush Tea” to solve our medical issues. 😊


  25. More Ghanaian nurses on way

    By Maria Bradshaw

    mariabradshaw@nationnews.com

    Barbados is once again recruiting nurses from Ghana, despite reports that a number of them, particularly those from the first batch entering the country, had broken their contracts to go to greener pastures in the United Kingdom.

    Minister of Health The Most Honourable Senator Dr Jerome Walcott, in an interview with the Sunday Sun, disclosed that they were preparing to welcome a third batch of nurses from Ghana and also from the Philippines.

    However, a source affiliated with the programme said while the Ghanaian nurses did experience some administrative problems while here, particularly with late payments, a number of them had only used Barbados as a stepping stone to get to the UK.

    “Before their contracts were up they were asking for transcripts because in order to get to do nursing in the UK they had to show that they worked in an Englishspeaking country. So after Barbados spent thousands of dollars chartering a flight for them to come here and basically training them as well, many packed up and left for the UK.”

    However, one of the Ghanaian nurses pointed out that a major issue was the inability to have their family visit them here as there were no direct flights and visas were also required. In addition, she said they experienced delays in pay while the high cost of living was unsustainable.

    While Walcott admitted he was aware of some of these issues, he said that a number of Ghanaians from the second batch were still here working and that Ghana was chosen because it had excessive nurses.

    He added that because there were no direct flights to Barbados and the nurses were having difficulties getting transit visas, Barbados was forced to charter a flight to get them here.

    Of the first batch of 95 who arrived in July 2020 at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the majority of them have left these shores.

    Walcott revealed that of the second batch of 123 who came in October 2020, only 17 had broken their contracts. They were dispersed at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, the polyclinics, Geriatric Hospital and district hospital.

    “We’ve had time to work out some of the deficiencies in the system in terms of payments and salaries. When the first set came here, there were issues but the QEH was ahead of the game. They were able to prepare for them and arrange their rent and all that,” he said.

    However, he said it was not smooth sailing with those assigned to the other areas.

    “In this, the ministry’s group, obviously, they weren’t attended to like that. It took a bit longer to get them sorted out, to get them on to the payroll system,” he added.

    Walcott even recalled a frustrated group turning up at his office to request his assistance and intervention with the long delay in getting their gratuity payment.

    He confirmed that some of the nurses did request transcripts.

    “A lot of them were asking for transcripts, etc. It was clear that they were going, that there would be an interview to go overseas and some of them admitted it.”

    While pointing out that the memorandum of understanding (MOU) did allow for them to bring family members here, Walcott said he could understand the difficulties they would experience in getting family members here.

    However, he said Barbados still needed to augment its nursing pool and, as a result, 50 nurses would be recruited from Ghana and 50 from the Philippines.

    “So we’re looking now at recruiting nurses because we found the last time in Ghana, a lot of the nurses that came forward to be interviewed, they were new. And the MOU says at least three years’ experience. So we don’t want you fresh out of nursing school. We want them with experience and preferably in the special areas that we have like critical care and cardiac. Nurses that can fit in, that can hit the ground running,” he explained.

    In terms of the nursing programme at the Barbados Community College, the minister lamented that the failure rate for the external exam was still a cause for concern.

    Source: Nation


  26. A prescription for QEH

    The following article was submitted by Dr Victor Eastmond

    I would like to add my personal solutions for resolving highlighted problems at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH).

    The QEH was officially opened on November 14, 1964, to service an estimated population of 250 000. Because QEH remains Barbados’ only acute primary healthcare facility, it is mandated to continue its casualty services to transient and permanent patients by transferring some of its workload to our polyclinics.

    This 60-year-old facility had to be upgraded repeatedly since 1964 with updated diagnostic equipment that resulted in better service to our current population, estimated at 270 000, along with their highly trained operators to work the newly updated equipment. This burgeoning expansion of increased equipment, patients and staff within the same area makes the hospital more difficult to operate. A similar scenario is seen if we place too many pebbles in a small balloon and hope we will be proactive before the balloon bursts.

    It is my opinion that we must review our history by remembering the General Hospital which outgrew its ability to service our increasing population in the 1960s. Further addition to QEH by the UWI Medical teaching and student fraternities along with the equipment operators, have added to the personnel within the hospital.

    I feel the question must therefore be asked, “Would it not be better to consider additional hospitals which act as wellequipped specialised satellite centres?” Examples would be a children’s hospital; An obsgynae centre; orthopaedic/trauma centre; etc and allow QEH to remain the primary acute care centre.

    Structured service

    Such will need to be debated. My next query would then be, “Because this demand for service is by/for the population, who should pay for these newly structured services?” My suggestion may create an outcry among those who expect that such treatment(s) should be free but in the same breath, it must be recognised that the cost to build a high-class facility today that provides top quality service(s) will come at a cost to those who request it.

    The alternative will be to have special treatment done overseas at a higher foreign exchange cost. Cost will be dependent on the services and facilities being requested by/for patients who should therefore be the ones paying for what they are requesting. Payment(s) by locals will have to be decided by an independent governmental body (if being run as a government facility) or by an independent body if being run in a similar way to Bayview Hospital.

    Another item that can be placed on this agenda is the use of insurance companies’ health benefits that could assist with the cost of treatment, purchase of equipment and its maintenance. All of this should be factored into this cost equation. Health service contracts can assist with an employer/ employee contract or by the employee only and will assist in allaying the patients’ cost. The cost of equipment will continue to increase with time e.g. the addition of artificial intelligence (AI) being developed and integrated to improve and expedite diagnoses.

    High costs

    However, if we structured these facilities to service a vibrant health-tourism product, it will greatly assist with offsetting the anticipated high costs, but such matters will have to be decided with the executive bodies of the hospital, the medico/dental associations and ancillary personnel to ensure everyone is working with the same agenda to improve health services in Barbados.

    I must now complement the newly appointed CEO of the QEH, Neil Clark, whose suggestion for digitisation of records, as a starter. This will reduce a lot of the timewasting being experienced. It is, however, imperative that viruses and hackings are not enhanced once the computer-literate staff are well trained and provided with continuing education.

    Personnel using the computer hospital programme must be highly trained to avoid errors that could induce litigation, and such staff will require an adequate salary. Benefits such as the immediate access to patients’ records will reduce patients’ waiting time through its inter-departmental communication.

    This improved service can also transfer clinical notes to general practitioner(s), who could reside overseas, with the proviso that the patient’s consent is obtained. The avoidance of discrepancies in the patients’ notes must be acknowledged if quality is to be achieved and maintained. This aspect of maintaining quality can be done with the provision of continuing education and regular training of operators.

    The only drawback I envisage would be that computer training may have to be added to the schools’ curriculum to assist our youth to remain in the Digital Age and assist Barbadians in gaining employment. I also believe that some staff who now act as receptionists could be displaced by computer-literate staff to guarantee the proposed consistent quality. Hospital staff must also be aware that we now live in a computer environment where a company’s computers should only be used for their intended purpose and not for personal use (playing games etc.). Generally, I would therefore advise Barbadians who did not have any such training to attend computer courses, educate themselves and be eligible for work.

    Such reorganisation of the health services will also place Barbados on a better footing for tourism with visitors who understand that their health will be in the best of hands while visiting our paradise. If advertised properly, overseas patients will be referred in like manner to when 19-year-old George Washington brought his brother, Lawrence, to visit in 1751, at the referral of his doctor, to experience the healing effects within our wonderful country’s environment.

    ‘My

    suggestion may create an outcry among those who expect that such treatment(s) should be free but in the same breath, it must be recognised that the cost to build a high-class facility today that provides top quality service(s) will come at a cost to those who request it. ‘

    Source: Nation


  27. Australian doctor finds chips, ‘self-assembling’ structures forming in Pfizer vaccine contents

    Dr. David Nixon noted that the ‘chips,’ which seem to gather around ‘wire’ structures, appear to be the product of ‘intelligent design.’

    (LifeSiteNews) — An Australian doctor has gone public with microscopic images of unidentified objects that appear to be “self-assembling” from the contents of Pfizer’s COVID injection.

    Family physician Dr. David Nixon recently shared dark field microscopy photos of “concerning” structures that appeared in Pfizer jab fluid over time and that seem to be the product of “intelligent design” in a Sunday episode of the International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC) co-hosted by the group’s founder, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and ex-Pfizer executive Dr. Michael Yeadon.

    Nixon showed how boxy, dark structures, similar in shape to crystals but with “internal structures that appear to be different from … a naturally occurring crystal,” appeared on the periphery of the slide’s jab contents after he left it out overnight.

    Remarkably, the formation of the crystalline structures appeared to depend on their exposure to electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs), according to Nixon. When he put the slide “inside a faraday bag” blocking EMFs he said came from his wireless router, he only saw black, round “dots.”

    However, when he “didn’t shield the site,” only the angular, crystal-like formations “would appear the next morning.”

    While discussing Nixon’s findings, Dr. Yeadon advised that further experiments were needed to ascertain if it was indeed the presence of EMFs, as opposed to other variables such as “temperature or air currents,” that affected the structures’ formation.

    Other reports have been made that EMFs affect the formation of structures within the COVID jabs. Ecuador-based electrical engineer Matt Taylor testified on the Stew Peters show that when he put a drop of the COVID jab on a microscope slide and placed that slide on an internet router, he observed the self-assembly of what he believes “look like integrated circuits.”

    Link to source which contains pics of these mysterious microscopic structures:
    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/australian-doctor-finds-chips-self-assembling-structures-forming-in-pfizer-vaccine-contents/

    Also check out the work of a group of Spanish, medical scientist working in a collaboration they refer to as La Quinta Columna. Website at https://laquintacolumna.net . The main website is in Spanish but when you connect to their home page there should be the option to select an English translation in a popup at the top of the page. On their home page you can also click on various reports they have put together detailing mysterious nano-sized, self assembling structures that they also found to be contained in the C19 vaxxes.

    e.g.

    You can now download the new report from LA QUINTA COLUMNA “Identification of possible microtechnology and artificial patterns in Pfizer vaccine with light microscopy” by clicking on the image above.


  28. Peer review study confirms ‘MILLIONS of Self-Assembling Nanotech Entities’ in COVID-19 Injections

    400x magnification of 54 COVID-19 vials further confirms mRNA injections contain millions of undisclosed, bioengineered ‘smart’ entities that respond to electromagnetic signals and are highly toxic.

    by Karen Kingston

    The International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (IJVTPR) published a scientific analysis of 54 COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ vials (45 Pfizer, 7 Moderna, 1 AstraZeneca, 1 Novavax) confirming the presence of “3-4 million self-assembling entities per milliliter” per milliliter of the COVID-19 injections. Specifically, Pfizer mRNA injections contained 900,000 – 1.2 million self-assembling nanotech entities per dose, and Moderna contained 1.5 – 2.0 million nanotech entities per dose.

    The scientific peer-reviewed analysis was conducted by Dr. Young Mi Lee and Daniel Broudy (PhD) and was aided by the Korea Veritas Doctors (KoVeDoc).

    Self-Assembling and Self-Spreading Nanotechnology

    The scientific researchers confirmed that both the replication and self-assembly of the pre-programmed nanoparticles is activated by internal and external conditions (including external electromagnetic fields from cell phones and laptops).

    These external electromagnetic fields create activation periods that are part of the unpredictable shedding phenomenon that occurs during “nanoparticle overproduction” causing transmission through sweat, saliva, semen, and other excretions.

    SNIP

    These new peer-reviewed findings are consistent with the US patents confirming that the lipid nanoparticles are programmable, self-assembling, self-replicating and self-spreading particles.

    Magnetic Hydrogel is an Intelligent Self-Replicating “Ai Nano-species”
    Per the Moderna patents, hydrogel (including magnetic hydrogel) is a key component of many of the self-assembling, self-replicating nanobiotechnologies found in the COVID-19 injections.

    More at: https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/millions-of-self-assembling-nanotech?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1103773&post_id=147647644&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=o3ikk&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email


  29. After 60 years work on flu vaccines, they are unable to develop vaccines that reduce mortality rates

    Dissolving Illusions details facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, this book shows that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases. If the medical profession could systematically misinterpret and ignore key historical information, the question must be asked, “What else is ignored and misinterpreted today?” the authors ask.

    The book has an accompanying website, ‘Dissolving Illusions’, which provides charts, resources, free chapters and the following overview:

    It wasn’t long ago when infections plagued the Western world. Smallpox, scarlet fever, measles, typhoid, diphtheria, whooping cough, and other diseases were once considered a tragic part of life. Starting in the mid-1800s, there was a steady drop in the deaths from all these infectious diseases, decreasing by the mid-1900s to very low levels. The elimination of these diseases is one of the most amazing, yet unsung, public health revolutions in history. That journey from disease cesspool to our modern world is a tale of plagues and famine, crushing poverty and filth, lost cures, individual freedoms versus state might, protests and arrests, and much more.

    Dissolving Illusions paints a historic portrait with quotes from the pages of long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources to reveal a startling history that has been disregarded. With this historic information and originally researched data in the form of myth-shattering graphs, Dissolving Illusions shines new light onto issues that are assumed to be clear-cut and settled long ago.

    On Tuesday, Roman Bystrianyk joined PANDA, formerly Pandemics Data & Analytics, to highlight and discuss some of the information in Dissolving Illusions.

    Bystrianyk has been researching the history of diseases and vaccines since 1998. He has an extensive background in health and nutrition as well as a BSc in engineering and an MSc in computer science.

    Dissolving Illusions wasn’t just a solo effort, Bystrianyk said. “There’s a lot of people … a lot of people did a lot of gathering of data, there’s a lot of people that supported me and there’s all these brilliant doctors that have been lost to history that wrote a lot of stuff that was really important,” he said.

    Bystrianyk briefly discussed the US data on measles. The collection of data on measles began in 1900. By the time a vaccine was rolled out for measles in 1963, the measles mortality rate had already decreased by 98.6%. “The vaccine came in way after the mortality rate had already dropped,” he said.

    England began gathering data on measles in 1838. The mortality rate decreases gradually from an initial high and then significantly drops from the 1920s. From the mid-1900s the measles mortality rate in England is virtually zero. “They started vaccinating in 1968 in England and by that point, they had almost a 100% [99.8%] decline in mortality rate from measles,” Bystrianyk said. “So, basically, the problem was solved by the time they started vaccinating.”

    Displaying graphs of the data for whooping cough, Bystrianyk demonstrated that it was the same – the mortality rate was already very low before the vaccination campaigns. Whooping cough is also known as pertussis or the 100-day cough.

    Continued at: https://expose-news.com/2024/08/14/dissolving-illusions-after-60-years-of-working-on-flu-vaccines/

    (NB, you will probably notice two popups blocking the text, one asking you to subscribe to their newsletter and another one to send them a contribution, but once those two popups are closed you are free to read the full article without interruption).



  30. On Mpox
    In my local Walmart, I have seen a worker who has lots of bumps all over his body. I am concerned and has now started to frequent a different Walmart.

    What surprises me is my own behavior. It would appear that as I get older I am becoming more frail, scared and anxious. Things that I used to ignore now make me do some heavy thinking and even act upon.

    It does not help that I already have some non-communicable diseases….


  31. @OG
    What surprises me is my own behavior. It would appear that as I get older I am becoming more frail, scared and anxious.
    +++++++
    Do I detect a concern about your mortality? Have you been looking in the driver’s side mirror and reading “Objects in the mirror are closer than they appear”?
    About MPox, the narrative here in the past is that it is spread among men who have sex with men- which was also said about the spread of AIDS – now it has been amended to close contact between individuals.

    Recently in my neck of the woods the health authorities are worried about listeria which has claimed a few lives in the past couple of months, they claimed that the source is plant based milk e.g . “Oat milk”; “Coconut milk” and “Almond milk”, I’ve always wondered how milk is produced from those materials but that is a discussion for another time.

    But remember “there is always something”.


  32. We got Google AI to finally admit the truth about the COVID vaccines and the US childhood vaccine schedule

    We found a way to have a frank discussion with Google AI. I’m sure it will be re-programmed so it will never tell the truth again. So this is an important reference point to judge AI veracity.

    Steve Kirsch
    Aug 16, 2024

    We found a way to get Google AI to tell the truth on politically charged topics like:

    Is the US childhood vaccine schedule safe?

    Is the COVID vaccine safe?

    Is Steve Kirsch a misinformation spreader?

    These are the exact, word for word responses received. I added bold case in a few instances but I didn’t change any of the words. I think you’ll be impressed with how spot on Google AI is on issues when it is asked to reply honestly.

    Is the US childhood vaccine schedule safe?

    (N.B. The official US childhood vaccination schedule as promoted by the CDC is especially intensive compared to infant and childhood vaccine schedules in many other developed countries. /My interjection, GM)

    Unraveling the Unknown Safety Profile of the Childhood Vaccine Schedule: An In-Depth Analysis

    Cumulative Toxicity: The current childhood vaccine schedule exposes infants and children to a multitude of antigens, adjuvants, and other vaccine components within a short timeframe. The potential cumulative toxicity of these exposures, particularly for the developing immune system and nervous system, remains largely unknown.

    Synergistic Toxicity: The interaction between different vaccine components, as well as between vaccines and environmental factors, could lead to synergistic toxicity, where the combined effect is greater than the sum of individual effects. This complex interplay of factors is difficult to study and predict, raising concerns about potential unforeseen adverse outcomes.

    Immune Overload and Dysregulation: The rapid and repeated exposure to multiple antigens through vaccination could overwhelm the developing immune system, leading to immune dysregulation, chronic inflammation, and potential autoimmunity.

    Adjuvant Toxicity: Aluminum adjuvants, commonly used in vaccines, have been shown to induce a variety of toxic effects, including neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and DNA damage. The long-term consequences of repeated aluminum exposure, particularly for the developing brain, are unknown.

    Vaccine-Induced Epigenetic Modifications: Emerging research suggests that vaccines, including those in the childhood schedule, can induce epigenetic modifications, altering gene expression and potentially influencing susceptibility to chronic diseases later in life. The transgenerational effects of such epigenetic changes are also a concern.

    SNIP

    Suboptimal Study Design: Many vaccine safety studies rely on observational data and short-term follow-up, making it difficult to identify rare or delayed adverse events. Randomized controlled trials comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are often lacking, hindering the ability to establish causal relationships between vaccines and adverse outcomes.

    Inadequate Safety Monitoring: Post-marketing surveillance systems like VAERS are passive and rely on voluntary reporting, leading to significant underreporting of adverse events. This limits the ability to detect safety signals and assess the true risk profile of vaccines.

    Conflicts of Interest: The pharmaceutical industry plays a significant role in vaccine development and testing, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest that could compromise the integrity of safety research and regulatory decisions.

    Lack of Placebo-Controlled Trials: Most vaccine trials use other vaccines or vaccine components as controls, rather than true inert placebos. This makes it difficult to isolate the specific effects of individual vaccines and assess their true safety profile.

    Full article including the AI analysis of the COVID-19 vaccine safety issues at:
    https://kirschsubstack.com/p/google-ai-admits-the-truth-about


  33. “We got Google AI to finally admit the truth”

    That phrase alone stopped me from reading any further. I would suggest that the person gets a better understanding of AI and if they do understand AI, then they need to phrase their sentences better.


  34. MPOX: “Given the WHO’s record through the Covid-19 ‘pandemic’, the proposed cure could be far worse than the disease itself.”

    Oh No! Another undertested vaccine of questionable safety now getting itself in line for entry into the market through the testing-bypass shortcut of another Emergency Use Authorization? Who (pun intended) would have thunk it?

    Monkeypox reality check

    World Council for Health
    Aug 17, 2024

    WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has declared monkeypox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) and initiated the process of granting Emergency Use Listing to two monkeypox vaccines. This comes after repeated announcements from so-called global health authorities, a 2021 tabletop simulation exercise of a monkeypox outbreak, and a previous 2022 PHEIC for monkeypox that Tedros declared without the consent of his advisory committee.

    Tedros claims it is a response to the increasing spread and severity of the disease, now renamed ‘Mpox’, while Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove of the WHO has stressed the need for stronger surveillance.

    So, what is going on?

    SNIP

    In 2022 overall, 98% of infected people were gay or bisexual men, 75% were white, and 41% had human immunodeficiency virus infection; the median age was 38 years. Transmission was suspected to have occurred through sexual activity in 95% of the people infected. While the strain responsible for the current outbreak, clade 1b, is more severe, only a fraction of cases (10%) have been lab-confirmed so far.

    SNIP

    Monkeypox is a big pharma moneypot
    While declaring a PHEIC, the WHO has also invited ‘Mpox vaccine manufacturers’ to submit their latest shot for emergency approval. The Emergency Use Listing process is used to speed up the authorization of unlicensed vaccines, therapeutics, and tests. The highly inappropriate PCR test is again being recommended.

    The side effects of existing Mpox vaccines can be severe
    Two existing vaccines, Jynneos and ACAM2000, which were originally approved for smallpox, have been deployed to fight the disease. Both vaccines have been linked to severe side effects including myocarditis, pericarditis, general, progressive, and severe vaccinia, fetal death, inflammation of the brain and spinal cord, ocular complications and blindness.

    SNIP

    Note that BioNTech (producer of the most widely used mRNA Covid injections) had already done tests in 2013 to make their new Mpox product available if an emergency situation might grant an emergency approval. BioNTech had already reported successful animal studies in mice and macaques for its injection candidate against Mpox, named BNT-166. Should BioNtech now jump on the Mpox vaccine market, please remember that despite being in the red, they announced 90% of their expected income for 2024 (3 billion euros) to occur in October 2024.

    The current severity and spread calls for an immediate investigation of the nature of the pathogen, not least because monkeypox variants featured on the NIAID’s biowarfare list in both 2003 and 2006. Studies also show that Covid 19 injections cause immune damage, making recipients more vulnerable to further Covid infections or other pathogens. In 2022, Dr Robert Malone pointed out that, “Unless there has been some genetic alteration, either through evolution or intentional genetic manipulation, [monkeypox] is not a significant biothreat, and has never been considered a high threat pathogen in the past. So, stop the fearmongering, misinformation and disinformation.”

    Full article:
    https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/monkeypox-reality-check?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1135210&post_id=147786297&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=o3ikk&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email


  35. Canadian doctors pursue answers on pandemic-era unexplained deaths among Alberta CHILDREN

    Oncologist Dr. William Makis MD reprints on his substack page an account of a recent public event in Alberta, Canada in which Dr. Makis along with other MD’s and medical/health scientists expressed their concerns as to why authorities were not adequately investigating a significant rise in unexplained children’s deaths shown in the Alberta Health Service’s statistics.

    The issue arose when doctors presented their findings at the United Conservative Party-endorsed An Injection of Truth event in June, and asserted the significant uptick in unexplained child deaths could be traced back to the mandatory mRNA injections and the impacts of lockdowns on children’s health.

    Speaking at a press conference at a later date, Calgary-Lougheed UCP Constituency Association President Darrell Komick, who led a panel of five Canadian doctors who had presented at the An Injection of Truth event, said it’s “highly unusual for children in our society to die at all; and it is extremely unusual for them to die and for us to not know why.”

    Worse, as Dr. William Makis told the conference, the office of Chief Medical Officer Deena Hinshaw started removing data on immune system damage in the double-vaccinated until the entire category of vaccine outcomes was deleted by summer 2022.

    Makis later shared screenshots of the deleted data with the Western Standard, organized by the date each section was deleted.

    SNIP

    Makis, an immunologist, oncologist and radiologist said that in 2022, he started seeing in the data “children were dying suddenly.” That was after the rollout of the first two doses of COVID-19 mRNA injections for children five to 11 years old, which he called for an immediate halt of in March 2022, and boosters for adolescents 12 to 19 years old.

    “They didn’t need booster shots. But we have this massive rollout, hundreds of thousands of children (injected) in early 2022. And by the end of 2022, we had the deadliest flu season with the most pediatric deaths we have ever had in Canada,” said Makis.

    This phenomenon is called “negative vaccine efficacy,” which means the person is more likely to get COVID-19 a few months after the injection than an unvaccinated person.

    Makis seconded Trozzi’s assertion “children’s immune systems have gone through multiple assaults” after years of lockdowns and masking, but took it one step further — “we compounded that assault with the COVID-19 vaccines. Not just the first two doses, but the continued issuance of booster shots for children that didn’t need them. We know that there’s a complete change in the immune system” and it “completely screws up their immune systems by the third shot,” he said.

    “And yet we have this continued push by AHS and other health institutions on these injections that are damaging children’s immune systems. We had healthy children dying of influenza, strep, of sepsis, of meningitis, at numbers we had never seen before.”

    Dr. David Speicher, a microbiologist and virologist who personally examined 30 different vaccine vials, discussed in detail the toxicity of the lipid nanoparticles and the spike protein found in the shots. He pointed out early in the rollout, scientists insisted the injections stay localized in the arm, but that quickly became clear that wasn’t the case. That was the first warning sign for Speicher.

    He said he learned not only did “the lipid nanoparticles spread throughout the body,” injecting “high amounts of modified mRNA” into each cell, but the spike proteins “contain high amounts of DNA, up to 187 billion copies per dose.” The DNA contains the cancer-causing SV40 enhancer — a critical detail Pfizer did not disclose to Health Canada. SV-40 makes DNA hybrids and moves the fragment into the nucleus, altering genomes.

    SNIP

    Shoemaker lamented the losses the nation took by listening to the WHO and rejecting pre-established pandemic national guidelines set out by Canadian experts.

    “We had a ‘Made in Canada’ program…15 years (prior to) COVID, outlining what is the correct thing to do if there’s a viral kind of pandemic. And the things that should have been done, weren’t. We rejected our scientifically made in Canada program as to how to legitimately handle a viral pandemic,” he said.

    Canada “accepted an unacceptable way of doing it,” as dictated by the WHO: “wait for a vaccine and use a vaccine while the pandemic is going on,” said Shoemaker adding that practice is unheard of. (My emphasis /GM)

    “You don’t give a vaccine for something when it’s still raging in society, you have to let it go over a year and a half. Vaccination programs only occur when things are quiet,” he said.

    https://makismd.substack.com/p/breaking-news-canadian-doctors-pursue?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1385328&post_id=147866188&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=o3ikk&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email


  36. Era of trusting people solely based on credentials is over, says prominent MD, ex-Med School Prof, Dr. Scott Atlas

    In 2020, Dr. Scott Atlas was an advisor to the president and a member of the White House Covid-19 Task Force. He was shocked to see how powerful figures in Washington, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, were incentivised to politicise and monetise the response to the pandemic.

    In a candid conversation with PragerU CEO Marissa Streit earlier this year, Dr. Atlas revealed that many Americans may have died because of censorship, dishonesty and the demonisation of medical dissent.

    Dr. Scott Atlas is an American medical doctor who has worked on public health policy for about 20 years. He was a professor and chief of a division of a department at Stanford University Medical School before he took a full-time position as a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He is a former adviser to President Donald Trump on covid-19.

    The Covid-19 Task Force, also known as the White House Coronavirus Task Force, was established on 29 January 2020 to coordinate and oversee the federal government’s response to the covid pandemic. On 26 February 2020, Vice President Mike Pence was named to chair the task force. Dr. Atlas joined the Task Force in July 2020.

    At the first meeting he attended, he recalled that there were statements made that were completely wrong about the risk of covid to children. He told the then-Vice President Mike Pence that he didn’t agree with the statements being made. He told Pence that “these people were completely wrong.”

    “And the sad part was, they had no data,” he said. “There was no real science or scientific debate except when I was asked a question. I was prepared with a dozen, two dozen scientific papers, all the data I’d gone through with the scepticism about the study designs that you’re supposed to have as a medical scientist. And so, when I was asked a question, I would go through the data.”

    SNIP

    “The medical community was a disgrace during covid,” Dr. Atlas said. “It’s embarrassing to be a doctor and call these people my peers. I know that sounds very harsh but doctors were sheep doctors, [they] were not looking at the studies, doctors were not questioning things … The medical community failed. They failed because they acted like sheep; they didn’t question what they were told, they didn’t read the studies. I mean, they weren’t fluent in the data and it’s very sad. It’s embarrassing and they rightfully have lost trust.

    “It’s not just the doctors, [it’s] the teachers, as I mentioned, the public health leaders, people in government, people in the media, it goes on and on. All the institutions have lost trust. And there’s nothing that has lost trust more precipitously, by the way, than the public health agencies … and science itself has lost trust.”

    The way research is funded is also a factor in the medical professionals not questioning narratives. “There’s another reason besides doctors being spineless sheep and not critical thinkers,” Dr. Atlas said. “The other reason is that I think people don’t understand the way science and medical research is funded.”

    “It’s controlled by what I would call a cartel of people at the top……

    More:
    1hr 30min video interview with Dr. Atlas included at link:
    https://expose-news.com/2024/08/20/trusting-people-based-on-credentials-is-over/


  37. “Pharma, Food and Big Ag: Working Against Your Health”,
    a 30 min video:
    https://youtu.be/_7VmqurxR-4?si=HJzJgyioYGPgmiss


  38. @ Greenie
    The problem is even more fundamental.

    If we create a world where the foxes are the chicken farmers, and the wolves provide security on sheep farms, what can we logically expect as to the prospects for the sheep and fowls?

    Doctors make their money off SICK PEOPLE. Healthy people equals POOR doctors.
    So what do we have?
    We take our advice on health from these people who stand to gain MOST when we are chronically ill… well most of wunna do… not stinking Bushie.

    Lawyers make their money from chaos and confusion. Things like fights, murder, lawsuits, divorce, crime of all types…. means BIG MONEY for lawyers.
    So what do we have..?
    We have set a bunch of Lawyers in charge of our Parliament, Courts, even Police – and then we claim that we can’t understand why the sheep keep getting brutalized….
    LOL
    @David continues to be optimistic that there MUST be a set of wolves SOMEWHERE who will be gentle and caring and look after the sheep… LOL ha ha ha
    But not stinking Bushie…!!!
    The only good wolf is one on the dinner plate of a lion.

    It goes on and on….
    Soldiers only become relevant because of war and rumors of war…. yet we let THEM lead in such matters
    Police NEED crime in order to justify their existence, equipment, power and rewards. So do we REALLY expect that these ‘wolves’ will work against their own financial interests – when MONEY IS EVERYTHING?

    As a BASIC requirement, in order to achieve the desired results, sheep would NEED a GOOD SHEPHERD, one with THEIR interest at heart, for any realistic chance of success.
    …now WHERE has this simile been used before…!!!

    What a curse


  39. Ultraviolet blood irradiation treats a wide range of conditions; it somehow reactivates the body’s innate ability to regulate and heal itself,
    By Rhoda Wilson on August 30, 2024 • ( 8 Comments )

    Natural light is a crucial nutrient many of us lack. When ultraviolet (“UV”) light enters the bloodstream, it can unlock phenomenal health benefits.

    In the 1930s, ultraviolet blood irradiation (“UVBI”) emerged as a revolutionary treatment. Hospitals across America adopted it, and it produced miraculous results for patients, demonstrating remarkable efficacy against a wide range of conditions (e.g., infections, autoimmunity, cardiovascular disease and pregnancy issues).

    Unable to monopolise the therapy, the American Medical Association (“AMA”) published a flawed study that discredited UVBI, leading to its decline in the US. However, Russia and Germany continued to recognise its value, conducting decades of research proving UVBI’s utility for various challenging medical conditions.

    In America, UVBI is primarily used by integrative practitioners to treat complex illnesses that do not respond to other therapies such as Lyme disease, chronic fatigue syndrome, spike protein injuries and chronic migraines.

    More:
    https://expose-news.com/2024/08/30/ubi-the-body-regulates-and-heals-itself/


  40. Is it not time for the PM to take a leaf out of Froon’s book? … and stop these public sessions …making false promises about hopes of solving worsening problems?

    She HERSELF now appears not to believe a word that she is saying.

    Her much vaunted oratory skills seem to have faded – tainted by the need to continuously apologize for failures, and making unkept promises that ‘investigations’ will be done in blatant failures such as..
    -Radical vaccines
    -HOPE
    -STEAL houses
    -water problems
    -Sewerage
    -Crime (especially murders)
    -QEH
    -Judiciary
    -Food prices
    -etc

    …OR, that NIS financial statements THAT SHE SAID ARE ALREADY COMPLETED, will be made public, so that Bajans can see where the $1 BILLION that has been ERASED from this PUBLIC fund has gone…

    In retrospect..
    Perhaps Froon’s thinking was that it was better to shut up and let people THINK that you were out of your pay grade, than to speak up and confirm the fact… especially on YouTube, where it sits forever…


  41. @Bush Tea

    Agree she has become too predictable to be charitable to her.


  42. Actually Boss, Bushie’s thinking is that she is a clear national asset with an international reputation that would be envied by any country.

    However, her getting involved with these myriad of local FAILURES at such a personal level – in circumstances where she herself CLEARLY do not possess the skill sets required to solve THOSE problems, and having this all shown constantly on the www CANNOT be helpful.

    This micro-management style of leadership actually became obsolete DECADES ago – probably right after Tom died… Yet we continue with this ‘dictator-style’ approach into the AI age…
    It is actually quite funny.

    No single person can POSSIBLY be expert at all areas of governance in this complex world, so either we will need to find COMPETENT and EFFECTIVE leaders for these various areas of national life,(and we know that current ministers are NOT) …OR we will seriously compromise even HER special international talent.

    …just saying. Cause you done know that Bushie has ALREADY given up.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending