← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

grenville phillips
Submitted by Grenville Phillips II

Solutions Barbados was not planning to run any candidates in the 2026 General Election, because we assumed the electorate were not yet ready to elect anyone other than BLP or DLP candidates. One Solutions Barbados candidate, Mr Robert Toussaint, bravely stepped forward to test that assumption – and found it valid. However, the exercise was not in vain, because it gave us a ring-side seat to a now corrupted election process.

OMISSION.

Managing Solutions Barbados’ 2018, 2020 and 2022 elections give me a context to confirm that the 2026 General Election was – different. One glaring omission was the meeting of the Electoral and Boundaries Commission (EBC) Board, Director and Deputy Director with representatives of all political parties and independent candidates participating in the election.

That meeting is critical for inexperienced third parties, because it explains the EBC-managed electoral process and candidate requirements so that all parties are without excuse on what needs to be done. I repeatedly asked the EBC about that meeting. They repeatedly stated they never heard of such a meeting.

CONFUSION.

There seemed to be little institutional memory among critical EBC staff who interacted with political parties. At least two candidates failed to secure their nominations through a lack of knowledge of what was required. There was so much conflicting, inaccurate and partially accurate information shared and the EBC seemed unable to decisively adjudicate what was true.

Candidates were entitled to critical information they were unaware of – and some never received it. In a short election campaign, decisiveness and responsiveness are critical. This mess served only to benefit the established parties.

UNFAIR ELECTION PROCESS.

Calling a snap election is an option of the Prime Minister. However, there is a difference between a snap election and a fair election. A fair election provides all parties sufficient time to get volunteers to deliver campaign information to voters. The two-week period (from Nomination Day to Election Day) is adequate if persons worked full-time.

Third parties do not have multitudes of supporters and may rely on family and friends. To work full-time on a two-week campaign means that volunteers needed to give their employers one to three months’ notice to apply for a 2-week vacation. A snap election without this notice only benefits the established parties. A fair Barbadian election process may be to either: (i) have a fixed election date or (ii) call an election with election day being at least 4 months later.

VOTER SUPPRESSION.

Robert was properly nominated by persons the EBC verified were registered to vote in the Christ Church South constituency. On the day of the election, I took one of them to vote for Robert, but by then, the EBC had removed him from voting in Christ Church South and gave him the options of: (i) voting for non-Solutions Barbados candidates in the Christ Church East Central constituency or (ii) not voting at all. He was leaning towards the latter – which evidences voter suppression.

I understand that this sophisticated home-grown gerrymandering, where supporters of one party in a constituency are forced to vote in another constituency for unknown candidates, reportedly happened across Barbados. How common this was needs to be measured.

NOT INVITED.

Only one third of the verified voters in my household received their Election Circular from the EBC. This important letter informs the recipient: (i) that they are registered to vote, (ii) of the constituency in which they are registered to vote, (iii) of the location of the polling station where they are to vote and (iv) of the date of the election. This non-invitation-to-vote type of voter-suppression was reportedly evidenced across Barbados, including in two-thirds of my household.

I do not have space in this article to fully explain what a disaster of an election process this was, but the cumulative effect of these and other voter suppression methods resulted in a 31% voter participation rate – according to the EBC’s data.  I now have no confidence in the EBC to manage our elections. I lay no blame whatsoever on the staff of the EBC. If you want to make bread, you give the baker specific ingredients. The EBC used the cement, sand, stones and water provided to them – and made concrete.

Grenville Phillips II is a Doctor of Engineering, Chartered Structural Engineer and President of Solutions Barbados. He can be reached at NextParty246@gmail.com


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

15 responses to “Eating Concrete, Part 1 of 2”


  1. Observers point out weak areas

    Barbados must improve its vote counting and electoral list management, reported the visiting CARICOM Election Observation Mission.

    While the threemember team has given Barbados’ electoral system a general passing grade, there were a few caveats revealed yesterday by chief of mission Ian Hughes during a media briefing at Hotel Indigo, Hastings, Christ Church.

    “While the process was transparent, the mission noted that the centralised transport and counting of ballot boxes contributed to a lengthy tabulation period, which could be optimised for future elections.

    Hand-over process

    “We observed that the presiding officer and the team completed the process by 6:30 p.m. in some instances and then they had to wait for another two hours to be picked up by the bus. Then, once the ballots are transported to the central counting station, there’s another process of handover and that handover also has its administrative procedures,” he said.

    Hughes said this resulted in the first results coming in around 9 p.m., but it was not until around 3 a.m. the next day that there was “a fair understanding of where the processes would have been” with counting still ongoing.

    He suggested decentralising the process.

    “The counting of votes at the individual polling stations should be considered to facilitate the more efficient tabulation and transmission of results and reduce logistical risks. This would also minimise the need for the recruitment of additional poll workers and security officers.

    “I must say this, there is trust in the system. We recognised that when we were going through our observations on Election Day. So the agents, being the agents of the political party as well as stakeholders and also the eyes of the public, allow also for a transparent process where the presiding officer, along with the senior poll clerk and the junior clerk, and along with those agents, can count the ballots at that polling station.

    “Once they verify there’s another process put in place where you sign the statement of poll, but that can be worked out in terms of how you transmit that. This would, in my opinion, result in having the results within an hour, at least, of the close of poll,” he said, adding this was already occurring in other countries in the region.

    The final constituency counted was St Michael North West. While the first of the boxes arrived at The Ellerslie School around 8 p.m., it was not until 3:20 a.m. that all the results were revealed.

    Hughes, who is also the supervisor of elections in Antigua and Barbuda, also spoke about better management of the voters’ list, a hotbutton issue which is still raging. However, he noted such inefficiencies were not unique to Barbados and some of the onus was on the electors.

    EBC issues

    “The Electoral and Boundaries Commission (EBC) may wish to review its enumeration and registration process to enhance the management and accuracy of the voters’ list. [However], we see [such issues] all the time.

    “Election processes aren’t perfect; there are always deceased names on the list and there are always anomalies. And so, the elector also has a responsibility in terms of checking to ensure that their name is on the register, to ensure that once that list or the preliminary list is published, they do their verification. And if they cannot do it, have someone whom they trust do this.

    “We’re not absolving the commission of, or any such commission, of not ensuring that all names are on the register but as electors, you also have a responsibility to check that register to ensure your name is in the right location and if it is not, then you will make the necessary requests or representation to ensure that it is resolved.

    “Of course, the processes allow for new lists, new registers to be published throughout the year. So my understanding is on or before January 31, a list is published for the year before. And so, we do have, I think, a responsibility just to double check, especially in light of this situation going forward, that we check as regularly as we need to in order to ensure that our names are there,” he said.

    The mission chief also outlined other preliminary recommendations, such as greater accessibility to polling stations for the disabled. When asked about the first-past-the-post system, some third parties have been calling to be abolished, he said it still served smaller countries with two strong parties, such as Barbados.

    Addressing the accusation the Prime Minister was unfairly disadvantaging her political opponents by calling “snap’ elections, Hughes said there was a provision for such under the law and it was up to the opposing parties to always be ready.

    Hughes said their mission was an extensive one and they had met with the leaders of all the political parties, as well as independents, the EBC, the Barbados Christian Council, the Barbados Evangelical Association, the Barbados Council for the Disabled, the Human Rights Commissioner, The Most Honourable Kerryann Ifill, the Barbados Youth Development Council, the National Union of Public Workers and the Barbados Association of Journalists and Media Workers.

    He said a comprehensive final report would soon be submitted to the Secretary General of CARICOM and shared with the Government of Barbados, as well as other key stakeholders and the wider public.

    (CA)

    Source: Nation


  2. […] Grenville Phillips II is a Doctor of Engineering, Chartered Structural Engineer and President of Solutions Barbados. He can be reached at NextParty246@gmail.com […]


  3. The internet (Wiki) was slow to update the 2026 results, but I guess you peeps already knew them by word of mouth
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Barbadian_general_election#Results

  4. Close but no cigar Avatar
    Close but no cigar

    Close but no cigar

    St. James South
    Candidate / Party / Votes / %
    Sandra Husbands / Barbados Labour Party / 2,590 / 56.61
    Pedro Greaves / Democratic Labour Party / 1,824 / 39.87

    St. John
    Candidate / Party / Votes / %
    Charles McDonald Griffith / Barbados Labour Party / 2,327 / 52.36
    Ralph Thorne / Democratic Labour Party / 1,884 / 42.39

    St. Lucy
    Candidate / Party / Votes / %
    Peter Phillips / Barbados Labour Party / 2,211 / 50.16
    Ian Griffith / Democratic Labour Party / 2,026 / 45.96

    St. Michael North West
    Candidate / Party / Votes / %
    Neil Rowe / Barbados Labour Party / 1,674 / 53.13
    Ryan Walters /Democratic Labour Party / 1,441 / 45.73

    St. Philip North
    Candidate / Party / Votes / %
    Sonia Browne / Barbados Labour Party / 1,905 / 51.68
    Simon Clarke / Democratic Labour Party / 1,672 / 45.36

    St. Philip West
    Candidate / Party / Votes / %
    Kay McConney / Barbados Labour Party / 2,740 / 51.96
    David Estwick / Democratic Labour Party / 2,187 / 41.48

    Perhaps someone could add some local narrative as to why these places were so close with DLP +40%

    (I still categorise every Barbadian as coming from a traditional working class background)


  5. Here is my personal ranking of the best Barbadian leaders:

    1. Supreme Leader, Eternal President of our Hearts and PM Mia Mottley
    2. Rihanna
    3. Major Stede Bonnet, the Gentleman Pirat
    4. The legendary first Gov. Captain Henry Powell
    5. PM OSA
    5. The last British Gov. Sir John Montague Stow
    6. PM Barrow as Mia Mottley´s mentor

    Tron


  6. As I said on the last blog, WILD claims of voter fraud…

    I checked the published list of names to be deleted for any errors that I could catch. I still have that Sunday Sun insert.

    I checked the online register of January 31.

    Eligible and registered persons had ample time to ensure that they were on the list.

    The result reflects the will of the people who voted. If I were Ms. Mottley, I would not be celebrating. She got fifty something percent of about thirty percent of the eligible voters.

    Those are not the results of a popular leader. She is a winner by default.


  7. While there clearly was an issue with the performance of the EBC the victory of the Bs would not have been lost even if all was 100% with the EBC.

    A 30% turnout speaks to a much more serious problem where voters feel it is just not worth voting. They were unhappy with the Bs but did not see the Ds as a viable alternative its that simple.

    Hence we will run for the next 5 years once again under an elected dictatorship. This is not the fault of the Bs either because a win is a win even at a 31% turnout. The question from tomorrow is what will those interested in forming a real opposition be doing about it?


  8. @John A

    According to reliable reports the vote % is 40%.


  9. Well hope these reliable sources ain’t the same EBC, cause I would have to take that with a pinch of salt after the issues they had with this elections.


  10. @John A

    Calculating the % is arithmetic.


  11. I am still on the list and have not lived in the country for two month straight for over 30 yrs


  12. John 2,

    You have property, a wife, and children here that you often visit for up to two months?


  13. JohnA:

    You wrote: “While there clearly was an issue with the performance of the EBC the victory of the Bs would not have been lost even if all was 100% with the EBC.”.

    This is incorrect. Until the data is analysed, we do not know how many people were not allowed to vote in the areas where they were previously registered. We also do not know how many people were not allowed to vote at all. Neither do we know how many people were not sent an EBC’s Election Circular.

    Why not wait until the data is analysed before concluding so confidently?

  14. Critical Analyzer Avatar

    @Grenville

    That analysis will never be done as it is too onerous and a waste of EBC resources. The best we can expect from them is a survey by constituency to identify who has left Barbados.

    I personally believe 30% of the list should not be on it.

    The main problem is identifying people like John A who have left the country that need to be removed from the voter rolls.

    EBC attempted to do a cleanup as a guy came to my house last year trying to find who lives in the area to clean-up the list.

    What they may end-up having to do is electronically track and remove persons who have not voted for 2 consecutive elections requiring them to re-register when ready to vote again.


  15. @ Donna

    Property only. Family all in USA after Covid and kids for college.

    I think I know what u are thinking because I thought the same . I was recently informed of someone who was away longer than me ( closer to 50yrs), doesn’t own scrap in bim and is home less often and is still on the list.

    CA

    I understand ur aim to try clean up the voters list but still u will have a lot of “available” voters that won’t be registered / vote

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading