Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

For Immediate Release from Parvati.org

The largest ecological and humanitarian crisis in history is at our doorstep. According to Philip Alston, the UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, hundreds of millions face impoverishment, widespread displacement and hunger, with the most severe impact in poor countries and regions that have contributed the least to the crisis. The sheer scale of the impending disaster calls us to step out of our status quo mindset and meet the needs of the moment with compassion, courage and forward thinking. MAPS, the Marine Arctic Peace Sanctuary, is an immediate and effective response, one the whole world needs now more than ever.  

MAPS establishes all ocean waters north of the Arctic Circle as an international marine protected area free from natural resource exploitation, commercialization and militarization, promoting a peaceful and healthy Arctic Ocean ecosystem for the benefit of the entire world. The Arctic Ocean ice is our planet’s air conditioning system. Its ice balances weather patterns globally so that we have the food and resources we need to survive. But it is melting fast. With 75% less summer ice than just half a century ago, and the open ocean absorbing 90% of the sun’s rays, parts of the Arctic Ocean are now 4C/7F too hot.  

The implications of such dramatic changes are enormous. A melted Arctic Ocean cannot maintain the Earth’s climate equilibrium, resulting in more frequent and intense weather events, threatened food production and water supply, poverty, disease, more climate refugees and ever-increasing suffering. Yet, instead of recognizing the loss of the Arctic sea ice as the global emergency that it is, corporations and governments are lining up to take advantage of the newly open waters. 

Led by its founder and CEO, the award-winning musician, author and activist Parvati, the all-volunteer international non-profit organization Parvati.org created the international Marine Arctic Peace Sanctuary (MAPS) Treaty to protect this key and vulnerable region by transforming it into the world’s largest preservation area. The MAPS Treaty has been translated into all official UN languages, provided to all 193 UN member states, and shared with officials at major UN conferences since 2015. MAPS stops Arctic exploitation while compelling a global shift to renewables, protecting remaining sea ice from destruction and befoulment caused by commercial and military traffic. With signatures from 99 countries, the MAPS Treaty enters into force, protecting all life on Earth for generations to come. It has already been signed by Samoa and the Cook Islands.  

At this pivotal moment in human history, we no longer have time for anything but bold and decisive action to protect our shared future. That’s why Parvati.org is now finalizing an innovative global education strategy (GES) that harnesses the exponential power of modern media to cool minds, lighten footprints, and awaken an inevitable call for MAPS. Everyone has the right to know a healthy world is possible, so they can put pressure on their leaders to sign the MAPS Treaty immediately. 

“There is no safe place on Earth if the vulnerable Arctic Ocean is exploited,” says Parvati. “We must speak up now for our common good and call for immediate protection of the Arctic sea ice, our planet’s air conditioner. The ice isn’t waiting, and neither can we.” 

Citizens of all nations are urged to sign and share the MAPS petition at https://parvati.org, and to call on their world leaders to sign the MAPS Treaty. 

For media inquiries, please contact: 

Vandana Erin Ryder 

General Counsel, Parvati.org 

1-778-839-3231 

vandana@parvati.org 


BACKGROUNDER: FAQ 

 

Who is Parvati.org? 
– Parvati.org is an international, non-profit organization dedicated to a healthy planet. 
– We are volunteers from around the world. 
– We are committed to the immediate realization of the Marine Arctic Peace Sanctuary (MAPS) to protect all life. 
– Our long-term vision is to create a Global Peace Sanctuary, to address poverty and hunger around the world.  
 
Who founded Parvati.org? 
– Parvati.org was founded in 2014 by the Canadian musician, author and activist Parvati, who gave the northernmost musical performance ever to raise awareness of the melting polar ice.  
 
What is MAPS? 
– MAPS, the Marine Arctic Peace Sanctuary, declares the entire Arctic Ocean north of the Arctic Circle an ocean preserve. 
– It stops all activity in the Arctic Ocean that harms this vulnerable ecosystem. 
– MAPS is the largest ocean preserve in history, representing approximately 3% of the world’s oceans. This fits naturally with the United Nations’ commitment to protect 10% of our oceans by 2020.  
– Leading biologists call for us to protect 50% of the entire planet immediately to prevent mass extinction. 
– MAPS is not an end goal, but a baseline necessity.  
 
What does MAPS do? 
– By making Arctic seabed oil and gas unavailable for extraction and exploitation, MAPS will accelerate a global shift from fossil fuels to renewable energies. 
– As countries come together to sign the Treaty, our world moves from short-term individual gain to long-term collective good.  
– MAPS is practical. It’s effective. And it’s immediately achievable.  
 
Why do we need MAPS? 
– The Arctic Ocean ice is our planet’s air conditioning system. It balances weather patterns globally so that we have the food and resources we need to survive.  
– The white ice reflects 50% of the sun’s rays back into the atmosphere. But it is melting fast. – There is now 75% less summer ice in the Arctic Ocean than there was 50 years ago. The open ocean absorbs 90% of the sun’s rays, and today parts of the Arctic Ocean are now 4º C too hot. 
– The Arctic Ocean is under threat as never before by corporations and governments that seek to profit from the unprecedented loss of ice.  
-We are inherently and inescapably interconnected. What happens in the Arctic Ocean affects all life on Earth. We must act now to protect it. 
 
Why MAPS now? 
– All life on Earth depends on healthy, robust sea ice in the Arctic Ocean. But it’s in more danger than ever.  
– As the ice melts at a staggering rate, businesses and governments are moving to take advantage of the Arctic Ocean’s resources for short-term gain for a few, instead of protecting this vulnerable, climate-regulating region for the benefit of all. This is a deadly error.  
We must realize MAPS now to lead the way to a healthy and safe future for all.  
 
How is MAPS realized? 
– MAPS is being realized through the MAPS Treaty, an addendum to the UN Law of the Sea. 
Under MAPS, the entire Arctic Ocean north of the Arctic Circle will become an international peace park, free from exploitation of all kinds. 
-The MAPS Treaty enters into force with the signatures of 99 world leaders, including those of the Arctic nations.  
-Two nations to date have signed the MAPS Treaty and more signatures are expected soon. 
 
Why did a nonprofit organization draft an international treaty? 
– It needed to be done. We no longer live in an era when we have the luxury to consider one isolated region as if it were separate from the whole.   
– Parvati.org has no political or religious affiliation and no financial interests in MAPS. Our interest is humanitarian. 
– We know that all life everywhere has the fundamental right to be free from suffering, misery and lack.  
 
Is Parvati.org supporting efforts for peace and sustainability, other than MAPS? 
– Our sole focus at this time is MAPS because of its urgent role in protecting all life everywhere. It is the most powerful way to make a difference in the entire world. 
– Hunger, natural disasters and mass migration are all factors in violent conflict. MAPS mitigates them all. 
– Once MAPS is realized, we will broaden our focus to GPS: Global Peace Sanctuary. 
 
Do you have any political affiliation? 
– Parvati.org takes no political stance. The planet must be a healthy and safe home for all living creatures equally. 
 
Does your organization have financial interest in MAPS in any way? 
– No. The members of this not-for-profit are are all volunteers.  
– Our interest is in our collective survival. 

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

90 responses to “Protect the Arctic Ocean to Help Prevent Impending Global Disaster”


  1. David

    Tooooo late!

    Have you not yet come to see that we are doomed.

    This year there is likely to be no summer ice in the artic.

    We have the destruction of 300 lifeforms, dying off every month

    And we could go on and on.

    Yet, the peoples of the world cannot be made to care.


  2. @Pacha

    Your view collides with Noam Chomsky captured in this video, the thesis which is that a narrow band of people holding the wealth spells doom for democracy. The will do what it takes to ring-fence the wealth establishment. We make decisions based on money interest of the few, damn the ‘enterprise’ issues. The same issue will affect policies about the environment.

    https://youtu.be/wp6Rbgv1MLg

  3. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    yeah leh we protect the arctic fellas

    we can send the folk in the house and the blogmaster to the ARTIC TO PROTECT IT

    CAN ANYONE OF THE BU INTELLIGENTIA TELL US HOW WE WILL DO THIS?
    IS GOD THE CREATOR OF THE ARCTIC NOT STILL IN CONTROL?
    DOES HE REALLY NEED A SET OF HIS MORONIC IMBECILES TO PROTERT HIS CREATION?.
    REALLY?

    ANOTHER DAY
    SAME BULLSHIT ON BU
    BRINGING NEWS AND OPINION TO THE PEOPLE
    HURRAY!


  4. David

    We always like to support the general common sense you tirelessly show. But you continue to be bombarded, on all sides, by a level of supreme idiocy unknown to both mammon and god.

    We are happen to see that you have cited a fellow traveler, the great academician Noam Chomsky. Indeed, Noam is arguably the greatest thinker of our times.

    Capitalism has so degenerated that it appears impossible to save the Great Mother from its onslaught.

    Well, capitalism and the White man’s religious commitment to dominionism.

  5. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    PACHA MAMY THE BULLSHITTER AND ASS LICKER

    JUST ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS
    CAN ANYONE OF THE BU INTELLIGENTIA TELL US HOW WE WILL CONTROL THE ARCTIC?

    IS GOD THE CREATOR OF THE ARCTIC NOT STILL IN CONTROL?

    DOES HE REALLY NEED A SET OF HIS MORONIC IMBECILES TO PROTERT HIS CREATION?.
    REALLY?

    DID the great academician Noam Chomsky.CREATE THE WORLD?

    CAN THIS PETTY PITHY PIECE OF DIRT REVERSE WHAT GOD HAS SET IN MOTION AND CONTROLS?

    ITS NOT a level of supreme idiocy unknown to both mammon and god. BUT ANOTHER LEVEL OF THOUGHT INSPIRED BY THE CREATOR HIMSELF WITHIN ME


  6. His amazing view that the wealth or the privilege is protected by the American Constitution as a mechanism for preventing the working class or those at the bottom from taking wealth back is an eye opener.

  7. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    2PETER 3 TEACHES IN VERSE 5
    For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
    CLEARLY THIS CANNOT BE LOGICALLY REFUTED – THE EARTH WAS CREATED

    2 PETER 3 TEACHES IN VERSE 6
    6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
    THIS IS CORROBORATED BY Genesis 7:11
    In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. Genesis 7:11

    It can not be disputed that there was a flood.All ancient civilizations have a flood story of some sort.

    QUESTION: Did most of the water that inundated the earth at the flood come from rain fall from above or from the breaking up of “all the fountains of the great deep”?

    2 PETER 3 FURTHER TEACHES IN VERSE 7
    7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

    THE CONTEMPORAY WORLD HAS WITHIN ITSELF FIRE FOR ITS DESTRUCTION TO SEND UNGODLY MEN CRAZY!

    QUESTION: ARE THEY ANY PLACES IN THE WORLD THAT DEMONSTRATE THAT THERE IS FIRE WITHIN THE BOWELS OF THE EARTH THAT HAS THE PROPENSITY FOR DESTRUCTION

    QUESTION ARE THEY NOT MANY PLACES IN THE WORLD THAT DEMONSTRATE THAT THERE IS FIRE WITHIN THE BOWELS OF THE EARTH THAT HAS THE PROPENSITY FOR DESTRUCTION

    QUESTION WHY DO UNBELIEVERS BULLSHIT ABOUT CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS CAUSING GLOBAL WARMING WHEN CARBON DIOXIDE IS A NEUTRAL MOLECULE, THAT IN COMBINATION WITH WATER RESULTS IN GREENING OF THE EARTH?

    QUESTION WHAT DO YOU THINK ALL CARBOHYDRATES ARE? AND THAT INCLUDES THE CELLULOSE IN ALL THE TREES ON EARTH.

    WHERE DOES CARBOHYDRATES COME FROM? NOT UNION WITH WATER (HYDRATE) AND CARBON ( FROM CARBON DIOXIDE)

    2 PETER 3 FURTHER TEACHES IN VERSES 11 ET SECQ
    11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness,

    QUESTION HAS THIS DISSOLUTION NOT STARTED GRADUALLY?

    QUESTION NAME THE SCHOLAR AND ACADEMIC WHO CAN STOP OR HOLD THIS BACK

    12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
    THERE WILL BE A COMING DISSOLUTION IN WHICH THE COMPONENTS OF MATTER WILL BE DESTROYED BY HEAT IN EXOTHERMIC REACTIONS

  8. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David BU

    What an alarmist piece, devoid of any acceptable scientific foundations. GP has already pointed out the chemical faults, not to speak of the geological fallacies. What bad news are you two conspirators trying to distract the BU Household from? The world is evolving as it should. We on this small island are playing our parts. How come those who contribute most to global warming are on a technological road that requires higher generation of energy.? David we must think .

  9. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    For sometime now progressive thinkers have said that the two greatest threats to our region are the continued ignoring of our environment and crime.
    We have opted to occupy ourselves with worn facts and excursions into intellectual fantasy.
    Nothing that Chomsky has said attracts the thinking of the jokers who manage our economies.
    It’s therefore refreshing to read David quoting Chomsky, when all of his writings to date have been the completely opposite to what Chomsky has provided.
    Better late than never.


  10. @William

    Nonsense!

  11. Freedom Crier Avatar

    THE CONSPIRING CUNNING CRAFTINESS OF MEN OF OUR TIMES THAT WILL LIE AND DECEIVE TO ACCOMPLISH THEIR AGENDA $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. NO THE ARCTIC IS NOT SHRINKING IT IS GROWING!!!!!!

    NASA STUDY: MASS GAINS OF ANTARCTIC ICE SHEET GREATER THAN LOSSES

    Image…
    https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/side_image/public/thumbnails/image/antarctic-peninsula.jpg?itok=0tj-Ub6k

    A new NASA study says that Antarctica is overall accumulating ice. Still, areas of the continent, like the Antarctic Peninsula photographed above, have increased their mass loss in the last decades.

    Credits: NASA’s Operation IceBridge

    Image… https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/side_image/public/thumbnails/image/figure-dmdt-map.png?itok=9Mkjb47F

    Map showing the rates of mass changes from ICESat 2003-2008 over Antarctica. Sums are for all of Antarctica: East Antarctica (EA, 2-17); interior West Antarctica (WA2, 1, 18, 19, and 23); coastal West Antarctica (WA1, 20-21); and the Antarctic Peninsula (24-27). A gigaton (Gt) corresponds to a billion metric tons, or 1.1 billion U.S. tons.

    A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

    The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.

    According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008….

    “We’re essentially in agreement with other studies that show an increase in ice discharge in the Antarctic Peninsula and the Thwaites and Pine Island region of West Antarctica,” said Jay Zwally, a glaciologist with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and lead author of the study, which was published on Oct. 30 in the Journal of Glaciology. “Our main disagreement is for East Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica – there, we see an ice gain that exceeds the losses in the other areas.” Zwally added that his team “measured small height changes over large areas, as well as the large changes observed over smaller areas.”

    Read More @ https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses


  12. Sir William Skinner

    This writer knows Noam Chomsky. He is not a ‘progressive’ and would be disappointed that you would so call him.

    Certainly, he would be even more disappointed that you would seek to separate his thinking from anybody in a vain attempt to make a philosophical non-point.

    For Noam believes that his work should be accessible to everybody and should never be a device to divide those who may find something in it helpful in trying to explain lived realities.

  13. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Pacha
    I never said Chomsky is a progressive.
    I said “progressive” thinkers and my comment was in relation to regional progressive thinking on the environment and crime.
    I then said that the jokers who manage our economies do not embrace Chomsky and that we are usually taking excursions into intellectual fantasy.
    I then said that it’s surprising to read David quoting Chomsky. All of David’s
    writings to date are anti-Chomsky thinking. David continuously defends the decadent BLPDLP.
    If you seriously read Chomsky, you would have difficulty associating David with anything Chomsky has written or said.
    However your continued loyalty to David is admirable.


  14. @William

    Let us nip you nonsense in the bud. BU does not subscribe to one philosophy or way of thinking. Over the years commenters have posted the ideologies of many on the blog. Similarly the blogmaster considers perspectives from all sources.


  15. @ Vincent Codrington July 8, 2019 9:30 AM

    A sensible comment. This is not the first time that there has been climate change on this planet on a geological time-frame. Who can say whether or not this is a blimp in the climate or a normal change? No one knows for sure. Obviously, the use of oil and the emittance of green-house gases cannot be denied. The extent of climate change remains to be seen. According to the authorities earth is due for another ice age, What about plate-tectonics and its effect on climate change ? Super computers are used to analyze the many variables that affect climate. Super computers have their limitations; they maybe cutting edge to us but twenty years from now, people will wonder at how obsolete the equipment was. Only when quantum computing is an every day occurrence ,will it be possible to input the multitude of variables needed to get a solid answer.


  16. @Dr. Lucas

    From your last comment your view as a scientist is that there is not enough evidence and or data processing to support a definitive conclusion about climate change.

  17. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ David

    If my observation is nonsense so be it. You have the right to call it nonsense. I have the right to observe.

  18. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    VINCENT
    I PUT UP A POST FOR YOU WITH A FEW PARAGRAPHS FROM MY DMIN THESIS THAT EXPLAINS HOW THE PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY THAT WE FIRST DISCOVERED ABOUT 100 YEARS AGO EXPLAINS HEBREWS 11:1 & ROMANS 1:19 WHICH ARE TWO CORROBORATING VERSES OF THE GENESIS ACCOUNT. IT ALSO INCLUDED A SIMILAR RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SAME DISCOVERIES WHICH ARE WIDELY HELD PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY EXPLANATIONS OF 2 PETER 3: 5-11.

    GUESS WHAT?
    IT WAS TAKEN DOWN

  19. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    VINCENT
    DO YOU THINK THAT EARTHQUAKES ARE IMPORTANT AND RELEVANT TO THE TEACHING OF 2 PETER 3

  20. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    PEOPLE LIKE VINCENT AND DR LUCAS CAN RELATE TO THE PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY IN THIS EXTRACT

    In our discussions of origins, we must either accept by faith the speculations of man or the revelation of God. It is however noteworthy, as pointed out above that the discoveries of man, has contributed immensely to an understanding of the fact of creation at the sub-molecular level. For example, Hebrews 11:3 after stating that we understand by faith that the worlds came into being simply by the word of God, asserts plainly and simply that “things which are seen [visible things] were [are] not made of things which do appear [or that can be readily seen].” This is common knowledge that has been explained by scientists in the last century by kinetic theory and the various discoveries of the components of the structure of the atom. We can therefore scientifically prove that this verse is absolutely true. The created things that we can see are all composed of constituents that we cannot see-things that do not exist. The tangible things on terra firma and beyond are created out of nothing-ex nihilo- exactly as the Bible states in Genesis 1:1, 21, and 27, where we have described respectively, the creation of something from nothing, the creation of life, and the creation of human life. This verse corroborates Genesis 1:1 in teaching that the creation was made out of nothing. Hebrews 11:3 thus gives us both a macroscopic and a sub microscopic view of creation. This is now common knowledge in the scientific world, and information that is easy to understand, even by High School kids.

    Romans 1:20 is a corroboration of Hebrews 11:3. Whereas Hebrews 11:3 teaches that the things that we can see are made from things that we cannot see, Romans 1:20 teaches that the invisible things or the sub-microscopic things of the creation that we can not see are clearly manifested by the macroscopic things that we can see. Furthermore, Paul asserts that this is an indication of the power of God. Paul is saying that it takes great power to enable the submicroscopic invisible components of the things that God has created to become condensed into macroscopic things that we can see, feel, taste etc. Scientists know that great power or kinetic energy is involved, because when chemicals react they commonly give of energy in the form of heat. Honest scientists know that this verse is true. We don’t need faith to believe these two Scripture verses. The truth of these verses can be reproduced in laboratories any and every day. God has revealed theses truths to us in the last 70 years or so. The scientific scriptures are all now established facts. This certainly facilitates our accepting by faith the rest of Scriptures. If we can see the truths in these Scriptures, then what is so hard to believe about the rest of the Bible? A God that can condense the invisible into the visible as we understand it according to kinetic theory, and relevant aspects of Physical Chemistry, can in my view, easily perform with the order, power, progress and perfection as described in Genesis 1-2. Once one grasps the deep truths of Hebrews 11:3 and Romans 1:20, Genesis 1:1 is obviously fact!
    Besides Hebrews 11:3, 2 Peter 3:10 also contributes significantly to the discussion on the creation of the world at the sub-molecular level. In 2 Peter 3:10 Peter tells us that the heavens will pass away and be burned up. This is a most remarkable and relevant passage especially for this present hour, because it has silenced a lot of the more honest scoffers. It also contributes to our understanding of creation, in the light of our current scientific knowledge. This verse once occasioned much laughter and mockery as the question was posed, “How can the world burn when most of the world is water.” It then seemed inconceivable to the scoffers that water could burn. That criticism is now out of vogue with the discovery that water is composed of two very inflammable gases which burn most readily.

    Based on the theory of the eternity of matter–a premise on which much of science was based until about 70 years ago, with the work on atomic theory by Bohr, Rutherford, Pauling et al-the critics opined that this passage could not be fulfilled since matter was indestructible and eternal. Whereas once the critics ridiculed this passage and humble sincere Bible scholars who had no answer of explanation, had to be quiet; now, believers have had the last laugh. Not only do we know that it can happen, we also know how it can happen. In verse 7 we are told that the earth as it exists has been stored up for fire and literally with fire; thus signifying that there are resident forces present in the world which could destroy it. These concepts are known from experiments on chemical bonding- the glue that keeps matter together, and the discovery that most chemical reactions are exothermic, that is they give off heat, proves the claims of this verse. The effects of the release of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and in experiments in the dessert in New Mexico, demonstrated conclusively how accurate a scientific statement this verse is, and how simply it was put 2000 years ago. It is just that man has finally now caught up with his Physical Chemistry homework!

    In 2 Peter 3:10 we must also note that the word “noise” (Greek rhoizedon) is the word used for the swish of an arrow, the rush of wings, the splash of water, the hiss of a serpent. This is a word from classical Greek and used by the poets such that the sound of the word carries its own meaning. This word is used in the New Testament nowhere else and this specific sound implied is the best description of an exothermic chemical reaction and that of the sound of atomic explosion. Next it is worthy of note the fact that the elements will be dissolved or melt or untied with fervent heat. The word “elements” refers to basic material, atoms, the building blocks of the universe. This word is used of putting building blocks in a row or series, or of the first steps of a child. It is that which is primary or foundational, that out of which a thing is made. “Fervent heat” is energy. These descriptive words make us think of an atomic explosion. Whereas we are not saying that atomic fission or atomic bombs is the way in which God will destroy the world that is, we are saying that God has revealed to us that this passage makes good sense and has simultaneously silenced the critics. We can see both a logical and scientific way in which the world that is, can be destroyed. This verse is simultaneously revealing how the world must have been made at the sub-molecular level. It was done simply by the opposite to what will occur at it’s destruction!

    The word used for “melt” or “dissolve” in 2 Peter 3:10 to describe the future demolition of the elements is the Greek luo. This word has also been translated “loose” or “untie”. It basically describes the breaking of chemical bonds. If God can untie chemical bonds in the eschaton, is it too difficult to conceive that he tied them initially at the creation? We must see that whereas, the Scriptures does not claim to be a Science text, it makes very simple, but very accurate scientific statements in a very matter of fact way. This is because these issues are very infinitesimal to God, even though it took man several millennia to unravel, and even though he has not yet fully understood all the details.


  21. Sir William Skinner

    We cannot state with certainty that David has never quoted Chomsky or Bakunin or Russell or anybody else. We were surprised that you could.

    Chomsky himself, would not want the class or intellectual division which your statement conjectured to be a barrier to entry by David or anybody else.

    We generally think that the litmus test you seem to erect to judge whether this or that person is progressive enough or adheres to the mandates of what you call ‘progressive’ is a standard from a bygone era. This writer certainly does not recognize that anybody has the authority to enforce such on us.

    While we totally agree that the duopoly everywhere is ‘decadent’, that our leaderships are backward is inescapable. However, we have a duty to find people where they are especially a man who has never refused you an opportunity to publish your most radical ideas.

    Others here will provide a more substantial challenge for you.

  22. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ Georgie Porgie at 11:55 AM

    Thank you very much for your submission. I found it insightful.
    I do share your approach to reconciling the scriptures with Modern Science. The idea first struck me on Ash Wednesday several years ago. The priest said to us :” Dust thou art and to dust though shall return.” Obviously a portion of scripture.
    Armed with the scientific knowledge that matter ,made up of atoms, is not destroyed and that in this modern age no man has seen an atom but believes it exists, I came to the conclusion that the writer/translator used dust/ash as the most appropriate metaphor for atomic particles.

  23. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Pacha

    Also a man, who while inviting me to express myself on his blog has often called me JA and RH.
    Now you have stated that you can cuss anybody as is your right. But you’re telling me that I should defer from commenting on his submissions as a thank you for allowing me to contribute on his blog.
    In other words you are actually threatening me on behalf of David. You are certainly in a pickle here.
    You seem to be the final judge on what is old and irrelevant.

  24. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    “Thou” not “though.” Technology ! technology.

  25. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ William Skinner at 12 :33 AM

    The spirit of the Lord does not always dwell in man. David like you and I are human.

  26. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    VINCENT

    RE “Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return”.
    This phrase has its origins in Genesis 3:19 of the King James Version of the Bible. Meaning: after death our bodies revert to their earthly, elemental components

    YOU ARE 100% CORRECT SIR!


  27. @ David July 8, 2019 11:22 AM

    Climatic data from records only go back about two centuries. Extrapolation of temperature records from ice-core samples taken from Antarctica do give a fairly accurate depiction of past climactic conditions through the ages. These ice-core data obviously only go back as far as the time Antarctica became ice-bound. Other factors such as pollen can also be analyzed to give an indication of what the temperature was like. The analyses depend on the difference in isotopic ratios of for example carbon and on the magnetic footprint of chemical elements ( a result of the shifting of magnetic pole on earth over time.).found in rocks and plants. The results are approximations, in other words there is an element of probability with these results. Then, there are the approximations made in the model-system in computing the different calculations to be made. Inherently there are errors made which makes it difficult to have hard and fast rules or results.


  28. Sir William Skinner

    Well, we do not agree with such characterizations. Although we believe that you have called yourself worst in the past. We certainly would if an idiot distracts us from an important task today.

    However, we have bigger fish to fry.

    David is not a known Christian. This day a self proclaimed Christian called this writer something along those lines as well.

    But we just happen to be holding a large position in the markets today and need to reserve a response for later. Most assuredly, we shall be telling him about his mudder stinking cunt.

    But you Skinner, are always nitpicking at the slightest of perceived errors, omissions by David. You are bigger than this, There are much bigger fish to fry, and right here!

    Only today, you said that the environment was of major importance. However, ignoring the Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change and the thousands of scientist worldwide, in fact 99% of all climate scientists, a cunthole has elevated White, right-wing, corporatist, dominionist dogma over science. Even as he purports to be a scientist himself.

    And you Sir William, have not one rasssoul to say about any of this even as he has convince somebody else, who is titularly not a dunce, that you are engaging in terminological inexactitude.


  29. @Dr.Lucus

    Is it true that in many areas of life we make decisions based on probability?


  30. @David.

    Yes David I can confirm that last elections I was told by Mia that I was paying too much tax, so I said if I give her my vote the PROBABILITY was my taxes would come down.

    See what I get for basing my decision on probability! 😊

    Anyhow let me left wunna fellows to talk bout ice in the Antarctic.

  31. Freedom Crier Avatar

    THE BIGGEST LIE EVER TOLD – MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING

    March 29, 2019 Posted by Dr. Timothy Ball & Tom Harris

    Carbon Dioxide Only Causes Climate Change in UN IPCC Climate Models

    Today’s climate change is well within the range of natural climate variability through Earth’s 4.5 billion-year history. In fact, it is within the range of the climate change of the last 10,000 years, a period known as the Holocene, 95% of which was warmer than today. Indeed, it is now cooler than the Holocene Optimum, which spanned a period from about 9,000 to 5,000 years ago. The Optimum was named at a time when warming was understood to be a good thing in contrast to the miserable cold times that periodically cripple mankind. A small group fooled the world into believing that warming is bad and that today’s weather is warmer than ever before, all caused by the human addition of a relatively trivial amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere. IT IS THE BIGGEST LIE EVER TOLD, AND THAT REASON ALONE CAUSED MANY TO BELIEVE.

    The lie began with the assumption that an increase in CO2 would cause an increase in temperature. In the historical record, temperature increases before CO2, so the benign gas is not causing temperature rise. Indeed, it cannot cause global warming or climate change. The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models promoted by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This is the main reason why the model predictions are always wrong. HOWEVER, THE OBJECTIVE OF A BIG LIE IS TO OVERRIDE THE TRUTH FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE. Here are the original definition and objective of the big lie, quoting from Adolf Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels:

    “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the state can shield the people from the political, economic, and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the state to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the state.”
    The comments relate to a big lie in a nation-state, but it, like the big lie about climate, was intended to achieve global status. Goebbels applied the big lie of Nazism with its ultimate goal of a Third Reich to rule the world for a thousand years.

    THE UN CREATED THE BIG LIE OF GLOBAL WARMING BECAUSE IT IDENTIFIED THE ENEMY—INDUSTRY AND CAPITALISM—WHILE THREATENING THE WORLD WITH A POTENTIAL GLOBAL DISASTER. THIS SUPPOSED THREAT EXCEEDED THE ABILITY OF ANY INDIVIDUAL NATION-STATE TO ‘SOLVE,’ AND THAT DICTATED THE NEED FOR A WORLD GOVERNMENT. THIS IS WHY THE HUMAN-CAUSED GLOBAL WARMING LIE WAS CREATED BY AND PERPETUATED THROUGH THE UN.

    Read more @ https://americaoutloud.com/the-biggest-lie-ever-told-man-made-global-warming/

    https://www.facebook.com/cciscrap.com.au/photos/a.1828994783851582/2322589961158726/?type=3&theater


  32. @ David July 8, 2019 1:39 PM

    Sure. In business in preparing projected balance sheets as well as income and sale data. You want to advance the point that since some decisions are based on probability, then one should consider the climate change features in the above article as a given factor. The fact remains that in probability you have minus or plus one. The probability of either a minus one or a plus one occurring is about fifty percent


  33. @GP the scholar
    Apostles following an invisible God believing in invisible particles, not hard to believe.
    But your forgot the idiots back then believed matter was made up of earth wind fire and water.

    You like most humans are handicapped by your vision and the small spectrum of life you can perceive. The truth is our entire concept of being is based around the visible spectrum and hence anything that occurs outside we call it invisible. News flash nothing is invisible except God lol. Those idiots in the Bible you revere based everything on earth wind fire and water and said anything they couldn’t see was evidence of God.

    What next are you going to tell us, the genius Paul explained Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Gravity. I’ll wait on the scripture………………………………………………………………………………LOL

    BTW the Kinetic Theory of Gases is a proof that explains how classical mechanics applied to atomic molecules can be used to explain macroscopic quantities (it has nothing to do with Chemistry). There is a caveat, the theory falls apart when not applied to an ideal monatomic gas. To develop a true Kinetic theory of matter one would need to use quantum mechanics. Your flagrant misuse of the theory for your misguided religious zeal will bring you no closer to God, in fact you disappoint him, he told me so and he sent me to correct you.


  34. @ John A

    There is general consensus that there is global warming, Trump apart. How about discussing the issue in relation to Barbados, things this government can do tomorrow, if it is so inclined?

    By the way, I suggest you read Nobel Laureate George A. Akerlof on the economics of climate change.


  35. @Hal
    Climate adaptation is what small island states should focus on. We need to train more engineers because they actually solve problems.
    Unfortunately UWI is only concerned with medicine, law, accounts, political science and gender studies.

  36. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David BU

    ” You never know how expressing your view may make a difference” That is a probability. Yes. We do live by them. Keep up the good work.

  37. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    @GP the scholar

    Apostles following an invisible God believing in invisible particles, not hard to believe.
    But your forgot the idiots back then believed matter was made up of earth wind fire and water.

    ACTUALLY THESE MEN YOU CALLED IDIOTS WERE WRITING UNDER THE INSPIRATION OF THE HOLY SPIRIT

    HERE ARE THE TWO PROOF TEXT FOR THE VERBAL INSPIRATION OF THE SCRIPTURES
    1 – 2 Timothy 3:16-17 teaches that “All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.”

    2 1 Peter 1:20 & 21 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

    21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

    YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF THE VERBAL INSPIRATION OF THE SCRIPTURES

    RE You like most humans are handicapped by your vision and the small spectrum of life you can perceive.
    I BELIEVE GOD AND AM LED THEREBY
    YOU KNOW NOTHING OF MY VISION OR THE SPECTRUM OF MY LIFE

    RE The truth is our entire concept of being is based around the visible spectrum and hence anything that occurs outside we call it invisible.
    THAT IS YOUR CONCEPT AND MORONS OF YOUR ILK!

    RE News flash nothing is invisible except God lol.
    HEBREWS 11 DISAGRRES WITH YOU AND GUEESS WHAT I BELIEVE HEBREWS 11

    RE Those idiots in the Bible you revere based everything on earth wind fire and water and said anything they couldn’t see was evidence of God.
    WHERE DOES IT SAY THAT BIBLE AUTHORS Based everything on earth wind fire and water and said anything they couldn’t see was evidence of God. WHERE

    RE What next are you going to tell us, the genius Paul explained Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Gravity. I’ll wait on the scripture………………………………………………………………………………LOL

    KEEP WAITING OR GO TO THE DEVIL WHO IS INSPIRING YOU TO TALK THIS RUBBISH

    RE BTW the Kinetic Theory of Gases is a proof that explains how classical mechanics applied to atomic molecules can be used to explain macroscopic quantities (it has nothing to do with Chemistry).

    MORON IS NOT the Kinetic Theory of Gases TAUGHT IN PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CLASSES? WHERE DID YOU GO TO SCHOOL?

    classical mechanics applied to atomic molecules can be used to explain macroscopic quantities IS PHYSDICAL CHEMISTRY

    RE To develop a true Kinetic theory of matter one would need to use quantum mechanics.
    CITE REFERENCE AND EVIDENCE BY REAL SCIENTISTS

    Your flagrant misuse of the theory for your misguided religious zeal will bring you no closer to God,

    RE in fact you disappoint him, he told me so and he sent me to correct you.
    NO YOU ARE A NASTY STINKING LIAR! YOU ARE A DEVIL. YOU DONT KNOW GOD.
    RETURN TO THE ABYSS WITH YOUR PEERS PLEASE!

  38. Freedom Crier Avatar

    CONFESSIONS OF A GREENPEACE DROPOUT – DR PATRICK MOORE

    All existing commercial business operate for profit. In 1971 they were saying there is a global freeze and then they changed to say Global warming, and now climate change.. Half of this is a trillion dollar carbon tax scheme by very powerful individuals. Below is a presentation of an Ex-Greenpeace Director and ex-global warming activists who change his views and dropped out because the data simply doesn’t support the current theories for Global warming. Dare to watch it. Humans are not the enemy of the earth!

    https://www.facebook.com/137261216449365/photos/a.137269969781823/1322700621238746/?type=3&theater


  39. @ Redguard,

    Since 1966 our governments, both DLP and BLP, have been intimidated by making big decisions. Our last major project was the Deep Water Harbour; we have lost confidence.
    It is easier to borrow money, make big speeches and punch above our weight in our minds, than actually implementing major policies. Fortunately, the people do not expect anything major, so politicians get away with murder.
    Here are a few ideas the President can start with: one motor vehicle per household; scrap licenses for bicycles; introduce a two-year road tax free period for electric vehicles; ban vehicles of a certain age from the roads; gradually phase out diesel vehicles; and ban ZR vans and reform the Transport Board.
    While she is at it, establish a paper, plastic and metal recycling plants.


  40. @ Vincent Codrington July 8, 2019 12:33 PM

    A scanning tunneling microscope (STM) is an instrument for imaging surfaces at the atomic level. Its development in 1981 earned its inventors, Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer (at IBM Zürich), the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1986.

    Before scientists could build at the atomic scale they needed a tool to help them observe it. Before the 1980’s there were no instruments or microscopes that could image the atomic scale.
    In 1981 the Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) was invented by Gerd Binning and Heinrich Rohrer at IBM; the pair later received the 1986 Nobel Prize in physics for this accomplishment. The STM has ultra-high resolution and can image single atoms. This instrument allowed scientists to view a world that they could not view before: the world of the nanoscale. Many people believe that the invention of the STM was the birth of nanoscience.

    The UK’s superSTEM facility got a new electron microscope with unprecedented resolution.

    A new electron microscope unveiled at the UK’s national SuperST​EM facility images objects at an unprecedented resolution, right down to the individual atoms.

    You can actually see atoms now.

  41. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    TO BU SCIENTISTS
    NORMALLY FEMALE ATHLETES HAVE THE TENDENCY TO BE SMALL IN STATURE , HAVE AMENORRHOEA AND VERY SMALL BREASTS, HOW DO YOU ACCOUNT FOR THE MASSIVE MAMMARIES IN SERENA WILLIAMS?

    WHY DO THEY CONTINUE TO HARASS SEMENA ABOUT TAKING EXOGENOUS STEROIDS WHEN SHE ALWAYS TESTS NEGATIVE THEREFOR?

  42. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ John A at 2 :05 PM

    What figure ( between 0 and 1) did you give to the probability that taxes would fall ? The BERT period has four years to go. Hope eternal!!!


  43. @ Georgie Porgie July 8, 2019 3:06 PM

    I have always found Serena to be a very masculine looking. There was some talk( speculation) about whether she had all the necessary plumbing. From animal science large udders in cows are due to large amounts of fat.

  44. Freedom Crier Avatar

    THERE IS INNUMERABLE SCIENTIST WHO DISPUTE THAT THE CO2 ALARMIST AKA CLIMATE CHANGE AGENDA.

    DO 97% OF CLIMATE SCIENTISTS REALLY AGREE?

    Is it true that 97% of climate scientists agree that climate change is real? Where does the 97% figure come from? And if it is true, do they agree on both the severity of and the solution to climate change? New York Times bestselling author Alex Epstein, founder of the Center for Industrial Progress, reveals the origins of the “97%” figure and explains how to think more clearly about climate change.

    Please watch the video.

  45. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    BUT SHE IS OTHERWISE VERY MUSCULAR
    SHE HAS BEEN PLAYING AT HIGH INTENSITY FROM A VERY EARLY AGE
    ONE WOULD EXPECT SMALL BREASTS AS IN OTHER ATHLETES–AS THIS IS THE NORM

    THE CASE OF SEMANYA IS EASILY EXPLAINED–HER TESTOSTERONE IS NOT BEING CONVERTED TO PROGESTOGENS[

  46. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ Dr. Lucas .at 2:59 PM

    Thanks Dr. Lucas for the correction.
    It was sloppy typing on my part. I should have said with the naked eye. I have no intention of misleading the BU Household. The atom was split in the WW11. It gave birth to the first atomic/hydrogen bomb. In addition scientists have discovered two additional smaller particles.


  47. @Hal
    Between certain hours (I suggest 7:00 am to 6:00 pm), parts of Bridgetown should be car/truck free, with exceptions only to emergency vehicle and electric buses. Bicycles and small motorised scooters will be allowed.
    It would detach Bajans from their cars, improve air quality in Bridgetown, get Bajans walking more, encourage park and ride and allow for better development of Bridgetown as the world heritage site it deserves to be.


  48. @ Vincent

    The old keyboard I got would not accept A decimal point where I wanted to put it so lets settle for 0.001 as that was the lowest it would go!

    Of course I expect the PROBABILITY of more taxes is more likely.

    This probability thing real dangerous for true come to think of it! One could even say that I am skating on thin ice!

  49. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    These highly informative discussions in relation to global warming are to be welcomed.
    However we need to put in place immediate measures to save our deteriorating environment. We saw what sewage leaking onto the highways can do to our economy. That sewage is now being transported out to the sea.
    Our fishing industry is under serious threat if we don’t protect our coastlines etc.
    We are still way behind in proper drainage techniques and our streets have been littered with garbage for months.
    In the meantime our water resources are under poor management and daily failure at all levels.
    Our road network is under stress. Many rural roads have collapsed or are collapsing.
    Like I said lofty arguments about global warning are welcomed but………

  50. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    John A at 4:15 PM

    You are too wicked. I am going to recommend to Piece The Legend that you be banned.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading