Submitted by David A. Comissiong, President, Clement Payne Movement
Akanni McDowall (l) Toni Moore (r)
Akanni McDowall (l) Toni Moore (r)

Barbados – as we all know – is suffering from a dearth of national political leadership, and is currently in a state of crisis and great peril. But the good news is that we are beginning to see positive signs which suggest that the “fight-back” to save and restore Barbados has begun!

These recent positive and hopeful signs of a national “fight-back” consist of such phenomena as:-

  1. the new young leaders that have come to the fore in the National Union of Public Workers (NUPW) and the Barbados Workers Union (BWU), and the renewed spirit of courage and activism that the Trade Union Movement has begun to exhibit;
  2. the courageous and patriotic Budget reply speech that Opposition leader Mia Mottley recently delivered in the House of Assembly;
  3. the effort recently undertaken by such elder patriots as Sir Henry Forde, Ian Archer, Sir Woodville Marshall, Sir Stephen Emptage and Peter Laurie to propose and design a system of “People’s Initiatives” that would permit the citizens of Barbados to put forward proposals for new pieces of legislation and for changes to the Constitution;
  4. the new effort that is underway to bring together the forces of consciousness and progressive thought in Barbados to address many of the centuries-old problems of Barbadians of African Descent under the unifying banner of the recently proclaimed “United Nations International Decade For People of African Descent“;
  5. the initiatives that have been embarked upon by such notable citizens as Ras Simba, Hal Martin, Onkphra Wells, John Howell, David Denny and others to launch young Barbadians into independent business and artistic activity via such new formations as the African Heritage Foundation and the Pan-African Coalition of Organizations (PACO);
  6. the concerted effort that is now being made by this writer and other citizens such as Bobby Clarke and Muhamad Nassar to expose and put an end to the still existing old colonial practice of conferring outrageously privileged taxpayer-funded Government contracts on a clique of elite Barbadian business-people; and
  7. the admirable initiative undertaken by Messrs Andrew Bynoe and Patrick Frost to highlight and tackle the corrupt practice of “vote buying” that is now routinely engaged in by our Barbadian political class.

What makes these recent developments so encouraging is that they have emerged in a Barbados that has been through a virtually unrelieved ten year period of depression, disappointment and disenchantment, courtesy of a highly deficient and defective national political leadership.

If we go back to the last three years of Mr Owen Arthur’s 2004 to 2008 governmental administration, we will recall that we were saddled with a highly dysfunctional Government that deflated and depressed our nation.

But if we thought that the latter stage of Mr Arthur’s reign was bad, worse was to come with the Democratic Labour Party’s ascension to power in 2008! Under both late Prime Minister David Thompson and current Prime Minister Freundel Stuart our country has been saddled with a pathetic “do little” Government that has preached a message of national helplessness to the people of Barbados over the entire period that they have been in office.

For seven long years now all we have heard from this Democratic Labour Party administration is that our country is in the grip of an international recession and that there is virtually nothing that we, as a country, can do about it. And so, armed with this dispiriting and defeatist dogma, Prime Minister Stuart and his cabal of Ministers have been content to preside over a gradually sinking and decaying Barbados, with nary a word, idea or proposal of positive or inspiring endeavour being proferred by them to the nation.

Thus, for some ten long years now our deficient and dysfunctional political leaders have generated a miasma of “learned helplessness” that has settled over our nation and stifled it.

But the time has now come for us – the citizens of Barbados – to bestir ourselves and dispel that negative miasma!

I would therefore like, on behalf of the people of Barbados, to tell Prime Minister Stuart that the people of Barbados have never been a defeatist “do-nothing” people! Rather, our history has shown us that whenever the people of Barbados have been faced with calamity or crisis they have always been able to come to grips with the situation and to apply their energy, native ingenuity and creativity to overcome the crisis and move forward.

And so, the biggest problem we face in Barbados today is not any “international recession”, but rather, an uninspiring and unenterprising Governmental administration!

We Barbadians should therefore be encouraged by the recent signs of a renewed national spirit in the labour movement, in our Opposition Leader, in our community activists, and in patriotic elements within our civil society.

We – the citizens of Barbados – need to nurture this new found spirit, and find a way to get this dispiriting and dysfunctional Governmental administration off of our backs, and to put in place a new administration that is capable of inspiring the nation, unleashing the pent up energy of our civil society, and collaborating with both our Labour Movement and our business community.

This is the time for a new governmental administration that is capable of thinking and acting outside of the proverbial box– an administration that, for example, would appreciate the need, in a period of economic stagnation, for every Government Ministry to be mandated to identify and pursue at least one concrete developmental project that can add new economic value to our nation!

We must aim for a new development – focused Government that could rise to the challenge of collaborating and partnering with the private sector to ensure that all national assets that possess the potential to earn foreign exchange are developed and utilized to the fullest extent.

We must also aim for a new labour – respecting Governmental administration that could take the trade unions into their confidence, and genuinely consult and collaborate with the trade unions to sensibly restructure the public sector and the statutory corporations.

And what about the many ways in which a new labour oriented Governmental administration could empower and facilitate the credit unions, cooperatives, trade unions and other working-class and community based organizations to develop a new “People’s Sector” of the economy? Or to develop a national “Employee Share Ownership Programme” that would permit Barbadian workers to share in the ownership of the businesses that they work for and help to develop.

There are many, many ways in which Barbados could and should be moving forward! But before any of this can or will happen we must first throw off the dead weight that is holding us down.

Time to fight back and move forward Barbados!

88 responses to “The Fight-Back Has Begun!”


  1. @ David,

    Good luck to Jeff.

    Also bajans running 100 semis right now.

    Gittens 3rd in his heat. Cadogan ran 5th in his heat but both Bajans and De Grasse are in the finals.


  2. Seems as though garbage is not confined to the streets of Barbados, but could be found on BU as well.

    Firstly, the SSA employees are no longer on strike and Customs is on “work to rule.” Hence, since no industrial action is being taken at this time, Fruendel Stuart knows he cannot invoke Section 48 of the Laws of Barbados.

    He also is fully aware that there is no law in Barbados to which he could refer, to take action similar to what was undertaken by Ronald Reagan in August 1981.

    So, essentially, Stuart is just talking his usual shiite.


  3. and you know what Reagen actions caused the ILO to rethink and rewrite labour rules and guidelines that were concessionary to give govt a right to act when necessary for what is right and safe for the country and public best interest with an emphasis on essential services giving weight to govt to make necessary protection and safety calls if needed,
    This ram rod bullying tactics which took place a few weeks ago have nothing to do with the rules and guidelines of labour laws, the ILO specifically states that first and foremost rationale and responsibility is the first step.. with strike action last or averted preferably; Yet if one listens to the Caswells and Bush sh,its one would believe that the govt response to the unions actions were based on a tactic to quell unions
    Far from it ( it) was a cause to an unwarranted action by the Unions which was set to ablaze the sole interest of barbados and barbadians in order to replace with self interest and political power,
    It seems as (if) gone are the days when intelligent people would stick to agreements but would rather have “show downs” at high noon to flex muscles to make their voices heard. How sad.

    BTW what happened to sister soldier Toni Moore . the lady with the now infamous photo with a clenched Fist. A far cry and an obstacle which has never been seen done by a Union leader on the front pages of a periodical. Unions are respected brands of an organization which revels in responsibility and accountability as champions not only for its members but for the respective country, When the rights of its members are trampled reputable Unions seek resolve first by bargaining and last by strike action. fighting a balance of what is best for country and the rights of members which most of time is resolved amicably


  4. @ Artax
    wha’ Bushie tell wunna ’bout alvin…?


  5. ac,

    To you and your dlp morons…………….the arrogance and the utter contempt you show Barbadians will one day be dealt with by the long suffering Barbadians. One day coming soon………………..I am so sick of the DLP!

  6. are-we-there-yet Avatar
    are-we-there-yet

    The following extract from Barbados Today might be slightly off the topic of this blog but, not having seen any reference to it on any of the blogs dealing with the BIDC-NUPW matter, I thought I would bring it up here;

    Legal route; Dispute between BIDC and NUPW ends up in court

    Added by Barbados Today on July 22, 2015.
    Saved under Local News, Work force

    The dubiously settled dispute between the state-owned Barbados Investment and Development Corporation (BIDC) and the National Union of Public Workers (NUPW) has ended up in the law courts after all, with the corporation being sued for damages and costs.

    One week after the BIDC and the NUPW agreed during a sub-committee meeting of the Social Partnership that the impasse would not be referred to the court, the corporation and seven of the ten workers who were “forcibly” retired have filed separate actions in the High Court in the past 24 hours.

    Yesterday, attorney for the seven, Gregory Nicholls, lodged an action for judicial review of the BIDC’s decision to retire officers over age 60.

    “I have also applied for an injunction to restrain the BIDC from acting on the said decision to retire the officers, and this application for the injunction comes on for hearing before the duty judge next week Tuesday at 9.30 a.m.,” Nicholls told Barbados TODAY this afternoon.

    The notice of application for the interim injunction – a copy of which has been obtained by this paper – is requesting that the court issue an order restraining the BIDC from enforcing the retirement of the employees with effect from 30 September, 2015, or otherwise, until the conclusion of the substantive proceedings for judicial review or further order of the court.

    The court document, which names Attorney-General Adriel Brathwaite as second defendant, also wants the presiding judge to rule that the “retirees” be allowed to continue in their jobs until the court makes a determination.

    The seven claimants have outlined six grounds on which their case is based.

    One ground alleges that the process which resulted in the decision to compulsorily retire them from the BIDC was unlawful, in that the statutory board exercised its discretion unreasonably in breach of the policy of an Act of Parliament, “and in a manner which has dashed the legitimate expectations of the claimants.”

    The claimants are also contending that, having regard to their retirement becoming effective 30 September, they were likely to suffer adversely in the interim, unless the interim injunction relief is granted by the court.

    They are also submitting that BIDC was unlikely to suffer any loss or prejudice in the event that the injunction remedy is ordered.

    “The purported retirement of the claimants from the Public Service is not a necessary requirement for the proper and efficient conduct of the business of the First Defendant (BIDC),” declared the final ground.

    With respect to the application for judicial review, which is the substantive matter, the seven workers have also named the Attorney General as the second defendant. They want a review of the corporation’s decision and/or administrative action, and/or its omission to compulsorily retire them.

    The claimants argue that the statutory board had not given them any, or any satisfactory reason, why its directors opted to “forcibly” retire them before they had reached the age of compulsory retirement as prescribed under the provisions of the amended Statutory Boards (Pensions) Act, Cap.384 of the Laws of Barbados.

    The application lists five grounds of judicial review. That the decision to compulsorily retire the staffers was contrary to law; unreasonable; irregular; an improper exercise of discretion and in conflict with the policy of Acts of Parliament.

    In this regard, the affected workers will be seeking relief from the High Court in the form of financial damages and costs occasioned by this action.

    Alternatively, they want the court to quash the decision of the board of directors and to declare their decision to compulsorily retire them and to calculate or purport to process and calculate the gratuity and pensions due as unlawful, null, void and of no legal effect.

    Today, the BIDC lodged a related application seeking the court’s opinion of the legality of the board’s decision to retire the 10 workers.

    Chief Executive Officer Sonja Trotman confirmed that the application was filed. “We will await the decision of the court,” she said. “We couldn’t really say what will happen at the end of it, but we would hope that it would provide clear direction,” Trotman added.

    She acknowledged that once the filing was done it might not necessarily be the end of the impasse, but quickly pointed out that “the court would determine the next action, actually”.

    The BIDC’s decision to retire the officers resulted in protest action by the NUPW, with support from the Barbados Workers Union (BWU). The protest was on the verge of escalation into a national shutdown when a meeting of the sub-committee of the Social Partnership, held under the chairmanship of Minister of Labour Dr Esther Byer last Tuesday, produced a settlement that led to a suspension of the protest.

    The unions said they came away from that meeting with an understanding that the corporation had withdrawn the letters of retirement, had reinstated the workers and had abandoned an earlier decision to have the court interpret the contentious aspect of the law under which the BIDC had retired them.

    However, both BIDC chairman Benson Straker and Minister Byer challenged the unions’ interpretation of their offer to end the dispute, noting that it was not correct to say the letters had been withdrawn, only that the board had decided “not to act” on them, but to meet soon again to try to resolve the impasse.

    Since that time, the Private Sector Association of Barbados has written the Minister asking for a re-convening of the Social Partnership to clarify the misunderstanding regarding the perceived settlement.

    Seems to me that the BIDC has now completely repudiated all aspects of the contested agreements coming out of the famous meeting of the Social Partnership last week. The main areas of agreement which they initially accepted, If my memory serves me correctly, were: The letters of retirement would not be acted on and a legal opinion would not be sought.

    Yet here we have the BIDC going to court on the second matter and arguing semantically on the first one re. not acting on vs. withdrawal of the letters.

    The individual retirees also taking their matter to court does not count. It was not the Union doing so and it could perhaps be argued that the BIDC’s understanding of the first area of agreement hung like a damocles sword over their heads and they are now seeking independent judgement by a court on the legality of their forced retirement by BIDC against their wishes without reference to the Union.

    Some entity seems to be acting in bad faith here.

    Anyone think they can discern the fine hand of the PM in this matter?


  7. BAJAN DNA IN FORCE…..DEGRASSE GOLD

    GITTENS SILVER

    CADOGAN PERSONAL BEST.

    http://results.toronto2015.org/IRS/en/athletics/results-men-s-100m-1-01.htm


  8. @ Islandgal
    Bushie if a man comes and tell his co workers to strike won’t you first find out who will be paying them for those days they are striking?
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    If money meant EVERYTHING…possibly…. (so we understand Dragon’s position)

    But first …Bushie would first find out if the PRINCIPLE involved was worth the sacrifice of a strike. ….if it is, then money or not, …we striking.

    THAT HAVING BEEN SETTLED, the next step would involve the question:
    “Why should poor wage workers, having been shown to have a JUST CASE against incompetent employers, be made to stand the cost of SEEKING JUSTICE?”

    Finally another question:
    What happened in the past….?

    It that to difficult for your sexy brain to soak in…?

    Now if the strike turned out to have been unwarranted, then not only should the workers be NOT paid, but in addition, they should expect to be sanctioned for doing shiite.

    Is the dispensing of JUSTICE not the ultimate objective? If leaders are screwed up and workers are FORCED to fight for justice why should they NOT be paid? ….even if they do not EXPECT to be…?

    Were Teachers not paid for not working at AX? What is different…? are these just garbage men?

    BTW
    …how ya like Bushie new girl Donna…? 🙂


  9. @David, Artra et al.

    I am glad you solved the riddle, not that it was a riddle to those who know, but to get YOU to tell those who do not know the extent to which a government can, and sometimes do go, when they feel the welfare of the country as a whole is affected. Reagan invoked the Taft-Hartley act, Those air traffic controllers who were not fired were those who had not supported the strike, but the action of firing over 11,000 workers, and also decreeing that they would not have access to any federal jobs would speak for itself on the harshness of the action. More specifically the union was disbanded.
    This government may not have that exact legal authority, but each government has residual powers it can invoke, depending on the circumstances. Don’t for one moment think that the government is helpless. When the Taxi Drivers held the government to ransom, what did Tom do? There is always a way.The peace and good governance; despite what some may think, is paramount in the governing of a country. There are always emergency powers that can be invoked.And because it has the majority it can introduce legislation, that is enforceable to achieve its objective.

    Artra, you talk about …” no industrial action being taken…” A go slow is considered a form of industrial action, and a strike that is not authorized; especially if theree has been an absence of negotiations between the parties, is considered a “wild cat” and there is no obligation on the part of government to adhere to the conditions that would obtain in an authorized strike.
    Government is not obligated to pay any worker who does not perform his duties in the normal manner.


  10. Interestingly, as a result of Reagan’s action of firing the 11,000 air traffic controllers, it took the US government approximately 10 years before the full complement of employees could be returned to pre-strike levels. Some of the fired workers were eventually rehired in 1986.

    Additionally, those events cost the American tax payers millions of dollars to train new employees (much more than the US $770M wage increase PATCO sought for its members) before the system returned to normal. Additionally, It would cost the airlines billions as they continued restricted schedules until control facilities were back up to full staffing levels.

    From the above information, it could be reasonably concluded that Reagan’s actions paid off in the short-term.

    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    Reagan mentioned 2 main reasons why he terminated the services of over 11,000 air traffic controllers who were on strike, after giving them an ultimatum of 48 hours to return to work:

    1) They violated a sworn affidavit (i.e. they would not participate in strike action against the US government); and as such, Reagan deemed the strike to be illegal.

    2) By taking industrial action, the striking air traffic controllers contravened the Taft-Hartley Act.

    I found no information to suggest that “Reagan’s actions caused the ILO to rethink and rewrite labour rules and guidelines that were concessionary to give govt a right to act when necessary for what is right and safe for the country and public best interest………”

    Prove me wrong by posting to BU, the relevant information to substantiate the comments as quoted above.

  11. St George's Dragon Avatar
    St George’s Dragon

    @ Bush Tea
    You have to set aside your emotional response to this situation and think about it rationally.
    This is not about money, it’s about principle. The rules say the SSA strikers should not be paid for the days they strike, so they shouldn’t be paid.
    The strikers have a right to strike but should not be expected to do additional work clearing up the mess for no more pay so they should be paid overtime to clear up after the strike.
    If that ends up costing the SSA more money, the so be it. It’s not about money – it’s about principle.

  12. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ St George’s Dragon July 22, 2015 at 10:41 PM
    “You have to set aside your emotional response to this situation and think about it rationally.
    This is not about money, it’s about principle. The rules say the SSA strikers should not be paid for the days they strike, so they shouldn’t be paid.”

    OK, then! Fair enough. Let’s apply the principle of a “fair day’s work for fair day’s pay”.
    How about the SSA workers collecting only the garbage they ‘assessed’ to have accumulated since they returned from strike action?

    They should ‘employ’ the principle of Last In, First Out (LIFO) in performing their waste collection duties. The garbage they ‘assume’ to have accumulated before and during the strike (the bags and loose matter at the bottom of the piles or heap) would remain there awaiting management’s ‘proactive’ decision as to its removal even if it means calling in private waste handlers, the NCC workers or even the Defence Force, as it was being contemplated by the budding Dictator Stuart.
    Why collect something you are not being paid to collect? If management wants to play hardball and putting the health of the nation at further risks, then the workers can be ‘reactive’ accordingly.

    For Christ sake, you sons of black bastards locked up in a dark Cabinet, pay the people and let them clean up the place before the pied piper from Ilaro Court has to be invited to avoid the many outbreaks of viral infections hovering over the country like the seven plagues over Egypt.


  13. Yesterday evening, a miniscule percentage of the UK population tuned in to the second and concluding instalment of a BBC documentary entitled Britain’s Forgotten Slave Owners.

    The programme was remarkably devoid of emotion. The remit of the presenter was to shine a spot light on the history and the legacy of Britain’s forgotten slave owners using readily and easily available data from numerous archives. The findings were disturbing and shocking.

    I would recommend that if you guys are serious about making a “fightback” that you firstly address your slave history legacy. By refusing to discuss this legacy your future will remain forever blighted.

    http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2015/jul/23/britains-forgotten-slave-owners-review


  14. @ Exclaimer
    Why focus on our slave legacy when our current reality is even worse?

    @ Dragon
    man that is not ’emotion’. It is common sense.

    @ Miller
    Thank you.

  15. are-we-there-yet Avatar
    are-we-there-yet

    The logic of several posters on BU about the pay-for-strike issue escapes me.

    They agree that the motivation for the strike was a good one and that the NUPW initially achieved their objectives until the puppet MoL and MoE had second thoughts. Yet they strongly think that Government should not pay the strikers?

    We have a long way yet to go!

  16. Frustrated Businessman Avatar
    Frustrated Businessman

    No industrial action??!! Employers find this ‘work to rule’ issue quite funny, not 20% of the Bajan work force can manage that on a regular basis and certainly no-one working in Customs has done for the past 25 years. ‘Work to rule’ is Bajanism for doing less than they did before which was very, very little. But we must like it so since no-one since independence has ever been able to achieve any kind of acceptable level of civil service productivity.

  17. St George's Dragon Avatar
    St George’s Dragon

    This “pay the strikers” issue is just part of Barbados’ wider problem of enforcement and compliance.
    Squatters can take over land in a water catchment area and no-one does anything about it. The Speaker of the House has to be ordered by a court to return a client’s money and no-one does anything about it.
    ZR drivers commit 200 road offences and are allowed to continue driving.
    Firms pay no VAT for years and allowed to get away with it.
    BIDC tenants pay no rent for years and no-one does anything about it.
    The problem with a “no enforcement” society like ours is that everyone then thinks they are picked on when the rules are applied.

  18. St George's Dragon Avatar
    St George’s Dragon

    millertheanunnaki July 22, 2015 at 11:43 PM
    “Let’s apply the principle of a “fair day’s work for fair day’s pay. How about the SSA workers collecting only the garbage they ‘assessed’ to have accumulated since they returned from strike action?”
    I am advocating that the SSA pays overtime for the clear up. The strikers could make more money than they lost during the strike.


  19. @ Dragon
    “…..Squatters can take over land in a water catchment area and no-one does anything about it. The Speaker of the House has to be ordered by a court to return a client’s money and no-one does anything about it.
    ZR drivers commit 200 road offences and are allowed to continue driving.
    Firms pay no VAT for years and allowed to get away with it.
    BIDC tenants pay no rent for years and no-one does anything about it.
    The problem with a “no enforcement” society like ours is that everyone then thinks they are picked on when the rules are applied.”
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Of course you are correct in your above analysis and conclusion, however you also need to include a Literature Review in your consideration.

    We have a society where certain particular elements have FOR GENERATIONS NOW been a law unto themselves.
    THEY always “got away with murder” …so to speak.
    THEY always enjoyed the sweets
    THEY always operated above the law
    THEY always seemed to be exempted from ‘enforcement’.

    Are you surprised that the newly ‘liberated masses’ all seem to aspire to exactly such status?
    Are you REALLY surprised that most Bajans are so NASTY and unpatriotic with the environment?
    Does it REALLY shock you that productivity is NOT a high priority for workers who see themselves as producing profits for an aloof business class?

    Boss, such situations are VERY complex and their solutions are even more complicated. Just seeking to apply the letter of the law now to these sanitation workers would be simplistic …to put it mildly.


  20. The problem I find with bajans especially the so-called intelligent ones want to make laws that fit into their agendas and purposes a major cause and a roadblockfor enacting clear and precise legislation resulting with having an ass for the law and steel donkeys braying and trampling all over the count and themselves trying to change the ass law


  21. AC
    Why ! I am in agreement with you.Your minority government led by one whom you aptly describe as “a steel donkey braying and trampling all over the court(of public opinion) and himself trying to change the law” introduced an ERT law and ipso facto,people still got to go to court to deal with employee/employer relations matters.Then the same steel donkey trying to change union voluntarism and want to impose an Industrial Act which failed in Trinidad and Antigua.Morons in a minority government led by a steel donkey who is not wanted in a leadership role,evidenced by the action of the Eager 11.


  22. @David; and the Yard ducks
    You can call Bushie’s contributions,meandering,even when he is trying to talk abut his “women”. He wants to pay workers who went on an unauthorized strike; unauthorized by the union, but yet he agrees that they are doing something wrong, and then tries to make lame excuses for their behaviour by putting the blame on; let us make it short, their heritage. Nothing but yard duck poo; watery. Imagine him saying that the APPLICATION OF THE LAW AT THIS TIME WOULD BE “SIMPLISTIC”

  23. Colonel Buggy Avatar

    Is the 2015 sugar harvest over? Someone on another tread asked this question within the last two weeks. I am asking the same question now. Last week I stopped by a cane field in St Thomas ,to verify that I was looking at a field of mature canes. Today I passed by Andrews old sugar factory, and in a field immediately to the east of the proposed new factory’s mile long construction fence, canes were being manually harvested and laid out in long form on the ground, in preparation to being loaded on some sort of truck or trailer, as a mechanical loader (not a harvester) was present in the field.
    So really the Crop ain’t Over yet.


  24. hey Gabriell hold your horses the steel donkeys are the misled unions and their membership who wants to intrepret law by trampling all over the country and the ass law in search for resolve, nutting to do with the govt, so i guess here is where you and i go our separate ways.


  25. look do not pay bus shit any mind his love for the public service worker is as much and as bad as his love for homosexuals which by the way he mixed no words in his disrespect for both parties, bush shit alias deputy dawg is as hypocrtical as it can get, he talks from both sides of his mouth
    As a matter of fact his descriptive analogy of both the public servants and homosexuals are one of the same as he puts it! both like to f, people in the a,sss

  26. St George's Dragon Avatar
    St George’s Dragon

    @ ac
    I quote from BT “The issue is that the practice is WARPED….and anything which we can do to protect future generations from falling victims, the better. WE MUST THEREFORE NOT ACCEPT THE PRACTICE AS NORMAL, even though we don’t blame the current victims.”
    Interesting. Government sponsored anti-gay harassment aimed at someone who is anti-gay. Another sign that the Government doesn’t know it’s arse from its elbow.


  27. David Commisiong is singing for his supper . This man changes his political tune as soon as you offer him a tax payer funded position or consultancy. Owen did it and it kept his mouth shut and the moment he and Owen fell out , the same Commissiong ran around Bim with this same foolish rhetoric in 2007.You remember when he called into Brass Tacks Sunday saying Mia Mottey arranged a meeting at a south coast hotel to “get him included” in the BLP set up. When Owen had enough of him, he turned on Owen and bad mouthed the BLP even though he coordinated the BLP campaign in St. Michael in a previous election.

    Since PM Stuart did not allow him access to a “position” or the treasury, he is now openly campaigning for his cousin Mottley hoping that he might stand a better chance hitching his personal interest to her campaign. Do not be fooled Barbados by this self serving hypocrite and opportunist.


  28. commissiong maybe a relative of Bush shit talk from both sides of the mouth


  29. Well at least another step in the right direction was taking by the NUPW after much stampeding and vitriol ,the need to become warriors of engagement a necessary benchmark for good leadership prevailed as NUPW answered the called by minister of labour DR ,Esther Byer Suckoo to show assertiveness to that which is principle to seeking resolution in regards to industrial matters . Hence the response given by the NUPW with a formal letter of recognition in seeking resolution to the present and past industrial issues was a most welcomed response.


  30. “that as long as there is a rum shop to sit in front of and play dominoes; as long as there is a political pimp to come around occasionally to buy a rum; as long as there is a stupid mother at home to provide free meals; the only shiite they will fight for is a longer kadooment and another soca or some shiite on Farley Hill.”

    Dog dead.

    Arterexes could not have put it better Bushie. Neer a truer word was ever spoken Bushie.


  31. Even as i made my above comment. i am reminds me of the old adage fools rush in. in a news article yesterday MR McDowall was quoted as saying that engaging further with Dr, Byer would be most uncomfortable / signaling distrust/ but most interestingly enough those words had not yet dried on the paper before the official letter was sent.
    AS a young leader he will learn along the way that words can be dangerous however the public has a sense and a need to forgive when what is of interest is tantamount to the betterment of all parties involved suffice it to say that young Mcdowall had a lot to rethink over the past two weeks as he saw the chaos and confusion heaped on this tiny and innoncent island and one of a burden some of which he will have to bear

    President of the National Union of Public Workers (NUPW) Akanni McDowall has revealed that he would be uncomfortable meeting with Minister of Labour Dr Esther Byer after she accused his union of acting in bad faith and of treating her office with scant respect during the ongoing impasse with the Barbados Investment and Development Corporation (BIDC).


  32. “Well Well & Consequences July 22, 2015 at 10:53 AM #

    BTW….I don’t know where Dennis ‘were is my bribe’ Lowe and the DLP got their idea that workers should not be paid for striking; you do get paid in the real world, but obviously not in la-la island of Barbados. With jokers like Esther ‘do you know who i am; Byer, no one is surprised.”

    The employer in this case the Gov’t is well within it’s right to withhold pay from employees who are absent from work without permission. The Government’s General orders are clear on this. Absence from work without permission could very well lead to dismissal if the correct procedures in investigating the matter are followed by the employer. However the Government’s General orders do allow for employees to strike without fear of dismissal but without pay. All those public sector workers who withheld their labour to demonstrate in the great march of yesteryear and the recent march would have known that they were absent from work at their own risk. The workers were definitely told at a meeting before the last march that the employer had a right not to pay them. Nobody was forced to march.


  33. Another interesting feature in a news article on the opposite side of the fence was Commissioing statement of stoking the fire of discontent by highlighting the riots of 1937 as a necessary tool which ought to be acquired by barbadians to reign in his form of justice in barbados 2015 never mind that barbados has made strident moves forward since 1937 under an umbrella of peace tranquility and prosperity,


  34. “Frustrated Businessman July 22, 2015 at 3:22 PM #

    It is my long-held legal understanding that unions pay their members for days they are called out of work on strike, that’s what union dues are for”
    Perhaps you are talking about union activity in larger countries but not so here Mr Frustrated. The dues paid to unions are to take care of the day to operations of the union. In one union, dues are broken down into components out of which a percentage is attributed to an industrial action fund but funds accumulated are so small that it would never be enough to pay the 9000 membership if they all come out on strike.


  35. “ac July 25, 2015 at 6:20 AM #

    Well at least another step in the right direction was taking by the NUPW after much stampeding and vitriol ,the need to become warriors of engagement a necessary benchmark for good leadership prevailed as NUPW answered the called by minister of labour DR ,Esther Byer Suckoo to show assertiveness to that which is principle to seeking resolution in regards to industrial matters . Hence the response given by the NUPW with a formal letter of recognition in seeking resolution to the present and past industrial issues was a most welcomed response.”

    The NUPW leadership should never have met with the shady Minister of Labour again after her deceitful volte-face concerning interpretation of decisions coming out of last meeting. If the Minister really believes that ‘not acting on correspondence’ means something different from ‘withdrawing the correspondence’; then she is more jackass than I thought. What else though can we expect from a Minister who displays a complete ignorance of the tenets of legislation which she takes credit for piloting through the Parliament


  36. WEll mr balance opinions like yours serve no purpose but to frustrate ! infutriate ! nothing ventured sir nothing gained.
    Mr Mcdowall is young his sense of guidance through leadership cannot alone be served and presented by emotionalism especially when a nation interest of over two hundred thousand people lives are at stake and would have been put aside solely to please a few.
    As he pursue on his path of leadership some lessons would be learned mostly coming from disagreements.


  37. ac July 22, 2015 at 5:31 PM #


    the govt used discretionary action in the case of the Alexander teachers and rightfully paid the aggrieved teachers who had/show sufficient evidence of proof detailing that they were “wronged” over the ten years of tenure under the management and leadership of Jeff Broomes ( an employee of govt)and the govt did nothing about it, Such evidence within itself made the govt liable for any losses during the strike period since the govt was responsible for maintaining a civil environment for the teachers over the years the teachers were aggrieved and the govt failed to do so.Moreover the BSTU was able to have an inquiry which favored their side and removed Broomes”

    Never heard such jackassholery in my whole life. If you do not know of what you speak; please do not comment.


  38. Mr balance sir in reference to your above comment I am pleased to say it takes a jack ass to know a jack ass.
    Now my comments pertaining to the ax issue might not have meaning of any significance to you especially when the object to compromise was an effective bargaining tool. Furthermore the action if applied given in your earlier comment “not to pay “would have been wrong in that instance giving the presentation of evidence which was critical to show much guilt pointing towards govt

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading