← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

But quite apart from his immediate political and economic agenda, the Prime Minister (Prime Minister Fruendel Stuart) is concerned about the general direction in which the country seems to be headed. In an exclusive SUNDAY SUN interview this week, Stuart, 59, pointed to falling national standards while using excellence as his benchmark for performance. The Prime Minister is equally troubled by an attitude of “instant success” most pervasive among the youth in a “press button age”  – Nation Newspaper

 

Prime Minister Fruendel Stuart’s statement is insightful. Its relevance in the month of November should be taken advantage of by stakeholders to collaborate an set the agenda for the kind of society we want to build. In recent weeks there has been the debate whether as a country we should be focussed on building a strong economy at the expense of a society. Although there is merit in the concept, its genesis seems to be compromised by the public perception of the government trying to gain political advantage.

It appears from observation our success as an independent nation is now defined as the number of cars parked in the driveway, the number of trips taken overseas, the number of KFCs, Subways and other foreign brands which populate our landscape, you get the idea. Most disappointing is the  surrender of the NOW generation to embrace anything that is foreign. Perhaps we need to blame the parents. On the current path by the time we celebrate 50 years of Independence it will probably be regarded as purely ceremonial, devoid of emotional attachment to ‘yella, blue’ and any idea of self-determination.

It should be obvious to all who read BU we are fiercely nationalistic. Some may seek to label us as freaks for adopting such a position. Last time we checked one of the accepted definitions of nationalism is  “the doctrine that your national culture and interests are superior to any other”.   While accepting that Barbados has become a multicultural society, it should not allow the very qualities which are alluring to non Barbadians to disappear with out a fight. It is inconceivable that France, China, Japan, Brazil, Singapore, India to name a few would allow their cultures to disappear without a fight.

At the risk of being political, it can be stated this is one of the things which differentiates the Democratic Labour Party from the Barbados Labour Party. Why can’t we welcome people from other cultures and at the same time send a loud message that our culture is not for sale?  The very definition of who we are as a people and country defines culture.  Why are Barbadians so timid when there is the need to protect our culture?

At the centre of the problem which is forcing Barbados to lose its identify is our surrender to the American lifestyle. Some will take comfort in the position that it is not only Barbados which is battling the problem. The American lifestyle has intoxicated the world. Built on a plank of consumption and materialism, its lure has become irresistible to a global population whose DNA is wired to  cultural relativism.

Last week  the UK Guardian newspaper reported – “ The Indian environment minister, Jairam Ramesh, attacked the growing Indian taste for the American lifestyle, which he called the “most unsustainable in the world today”. What BU found interesting was the desire on the part of Minister Ramesh to act! In contrast our governments and other leaders in the society have taken a laissez faire and ambivalent approach to the question of what kind of Barbados we want to build. In the meantime Barbados is rapidly losing its face. The Late Prime Minister David Thompson started the journey but Stuart needs to continue with the urgency the situation demands.

Again the question must be asked. Why are we so willing to throw away the qualities which have defined our success as a nation over the years?


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. Can you let us all know where you buy those ‘rose-colored’ glasses you put on every time you mention the DLP. You correctly claim to be “nationalist” judging by previous content. A fact to be proud of in this day and age. But Man, I for one am becoming sick and tired of your blatant political bias. I, like most folk, think politicians are mainly a self serving pack of self-delusionary sycophants who don’t have the juice to be anything really constructive so they were forced to choose between being a critic or a politician. Now you come along trying to get people to believe that the late PM and the rabble he headed were different, were somehow more pro-Barbadian than the BLP! That is simply outrageous bias that totally fails to recognise plain historical fact. It’s your blog, you can say what you like, as can visiting contributors. I simply say you should think long and hard about whose memory you might insult by spouting such disingenuous clap-trap in the future.


  2. @reality

    Politicians are individuals who come from among us. The same villages and terraces and the same schools. To condemn politicians out of hand is to condemn everybody.

    Another thing, we always welcome debate on the issues. You defend your position and we will defend ours.


  3. Not sure how many watched the program on CBC People’s Businesss last night but more and more we believe Julius Gittens to be a better choice.

    It must be obvious why Historian Trevor Marshall felt he had to speak the most on the program.


  4. @David

    Is culture static?

  5. mash up&buy back Avatar

    David

    What do you mean ‘trevor maarshall felt he had to speak the most’?

    Also why your choice of julius gittens?

    Just seeking greater understanding and clarity.

    I watch the show and felt that Peter wickham didnot or refuse to -get the point trevor marshall was making,I suppose because it interfered with how he did his work in the region.


  6. Furthermore, the government just established a Richard Stoute Teen Talent trust to the tune of $400,000 and justified its establishment as part of their push for the culture industries. Isn’t the ‘copying’ of north american culture the dominant feature at this show?


  7. David,

    Peter Wickham did a disastrous job, in most parts, as moderator on the People’s Business on CBC TV last night, Sunday 28, November 2010.

    Simply because he was the moderator, he sought to control unnecessarily – by way of the disruptive timing of the ads and the improper sequencing of callers – the latter of which was another disaster story, what the very learned historian, Mr. Marshall, was saying about two things mainly – and to which he disagreed:

    1) that many youth need to be educated more about national independence ( history of the country ) and what that means to the country ( where as Wickham was falsely arguing that young people in Barbados see the country’s historical colonial past as irrelevant to them at this time), and,

    2) that vacancies ( future jobs) that are being advertised in the press to be filled by foreigners can however be filled by esp. young educated Barbadians ( whereas Wickham, with support from Hal Gollop, was dealing with an entirely different argument about Barbadians who travel overseas to get work or to do business in other countries primarily based on his ( their – in Gollop’s case to say it too) own experiences of going and getting work/business overseas esp. in the region.

    But he could not succeed – with all respect due to one caller to the program – at “gagging” – the very fiery some times very emotional Marshall, simply because Marshall was not going to have it.

    In our opinion, Mr. Wickham needs to become of greater intellectual substance – become more ERUDITE.

    As well, to those who have been giving many favourable comments on the two last articles that we have provided on BU we want to say thanks to them.

    PDC


  8. @mash up

    PDC touched on some concerns we had about the program. Peter obviously means well but his management of the program translates to bordering on unprofessionalism. Julius Gittens in our view is the only local journalist about with the courage, he possesses a deeper understanding of the issues and his regional experience would be a great asset.

    Wickham’s perspective is too narrow. If he spoke using data it would be understandable given his profession.


  9. David; Getting back to the main point “reality” made in the first post. There is no evidence that the DLP is more patriotic than the BLP or vice versa. Similarly, there is no evidence that the BLP is more corrupt than the DLP, or vice versa. There is no evidence, just historical spin, that the DLP cares more about poor people and the “society” than the BLP. There is no evidence that the BLP is or was the party for the rich.

    They are all the same.

    There is however some evidence that, from an historical perspective, the BLP has managed the economy a bit better than the DLP. This might have been just happenstance but it might also have been due to the possibility that at the times when the BLP had to resuscitate a damaged economy there were some people at the helm that were up to the task.

    At the present time, the DLP is by far a better choice for managing the economy and the society. But this again is merely due to happenstance. The BLP has a lot of restructuring to do and will need to get in a lot of young blood quickly to be capable of properly running Barbados in the future.

    But, a lot of propaganda going around about both the BLP and the DLP is just that, propaganda bruited around out of thin air by strategists on either side. Actually, I think the DLP’s propagandists have historically been much better than the BLP’s own.


  10. @checkit-out

    Revisit the context how BU referenced the matter which is being challenged by reality. There is a perception the DLP has integrated social programs more than the BLP. Former Prime Minister Owen Arthur realized this and established Urban and Rural to right that perception. He also used the politics of inclusion to coopt social practitioner Hamilton Lashley.

    Prime Minister Stuart addressed your point in his reply to the budget. As fate would have it the DLP has had governments in recessionary times.


  11. @ David
    And it took the Arthur Administration about three years from being elected to establish both the RDC (1995) and UDC (1997) including an amendment to the tenantries act which expanded to encompass to non-plantation tenantries. The so called social programme of this government–the Constituency Councils–are yet to be fully established and simply do not match up to the ingenuity of the commissions.


  12. @Enuff

    Point taken but bear in mind implementing social programs in a recession will always be a challenge. Arthur was in a slightly better position.


  13. The Prime Minister should cut up his credit cards; get rid of all his appliances; catch the bus and give up the perks of his government car; give up his house insurance; live in a chattel house with no indoor plumbing; wash his clothes by hand and hang them out to dry in the back yard; raise yardfowls and kill them on Sundays for lunch; plant a kitchen garden, keep pigs in his back yard.
    Why doesn’t the Prime Minister lead by example and show us the way?

  14. Retired bajan who worked Avatar
    Retired bajan who worked

    You are right, David but what can be done to defend Bajan culture?

    I suggest some things but other people might have other suggestions. This blog could start to make a list of things we could do to save the culture. This is my list.

    1. Like they do in France, put a quota on the amount of American movies we can watch. Maybe ban American movies at the Globe and the other places and only let us see proper Bajan movies.

    2. Stop this multichoice cable TV foolishness and the satellite. Channel 8 was good enuff for the elders so why isnt it good for us.

    3. Ban jeans and baseball caps. They are American.

    4. We cant ban KFC its too popular but lets have a international pudding & souse chain.

    5. Ban all American so-called medications and lets use our own Bajan medicines.

    6. Stop importing so-called Coca Cola which is known to cause diabetes.

    7. Stop importing so-called “foreign” beers because they use foreign exchange and Banks is enough.

    8. Stop importing all so-called American cars and Japanese cars and lets drive our own Bajan cars.

    9. Stop borrowing money from America and lets print our own Bajan money if we need money.


  15. RBWW,

    Are you sane?


  16. @Retired bajan who worked…

    An interesting nine point action list.

    Do you actually think these actions will work to our advantage?

    Or are we Bajans (to be politicly correct) somewhat disabled?

  17. Retired bajan who worked Avatar
    Retired bajan who worked

    Christopher Halsall Yes I think this will work. Like David and BU I am a “fiercely nationalistic”.

    Why should we buy computers, from coolies like mash says in India and Japan and China when we can make our own Bajan computers?

    Why we importing cars from America when we have an educated yout to make cars, better cars.

    Why the coolies and the Americans think they can jus come in here and the lebanese and sell us the intraweb when we got nuff Bajans, educated bajans to make us a bajan inter Net?

    You think we cant do it.?.


  18. @Retired Bajan

    That is a good one!


  19. Barbados named in latest data dump from Wikileaks. Names specified.

    Inside Track sources say to expect info about Barbados on Day 4 of the data dump.

    [this message copied; not sole source]

  20. My Name Is Not Sylvan Avatar
    My Name Is Not Sylvan

    @ David,

    “At the risk of being political, it can be stated this is one of the things which differentiates the Democratic Labour Party from the Barbados Labour Party.”

    Really?

    in rhetoric perhaps.

    But what are the facts?

  21. My Name Really is Sylvan Avatar
    My Name Really is Sylvan

    What are the facts, David?


  22. @My Name Really is Sylvan

    Are we not allowed to state opinions and discuss?

    Are we in a court of law?


  23. Please ignore Retired bajan who worked.

    This is the usual suspect trying to be mischievous.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading