← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Yardbroom

 

Prime Minister Fruendel Stuart

Now that our late Prime Minister Mr David Thompson has been laid to rest, in the parish of St John; a place that meant more to him than just a constituency.  It is now fitting for us to reflect.

Before the last general election, there were concerns freely expressed on the blogs and other places, about the type of Barbadian society being constructed by the then Government.  There were “allegations and I repeat “allegations”, that the meagre finances of our country were not being spent as they should have been.  A few commentators made the point, that they were fearful of expressing their views openly, because of expected victimization.  I will not suggest that the aforementioned were true but there was a perception held by many, there was currency to those perceptions.

During the elections, on the blogs, vile profanities and personal attacks were used to dissuade ordinary bloggers, who supported the then opposition.  I am not suggesting this was done with official Party sanction. . . but the reality is it was done.  Even official candidates, were subjected to personal attacks, not usually associated with Barbados’ elections, and in one instance a female candidate felt the “brunt” of such behaviour.  In the spirit of forgiveness, I will now let that rest.

The people will always have the last word in a democracy, and out of that vortex of accusations, fear, and mental turmoil, they voted the Democratic Labour Party into government, with a substantial majority.

It then became immediately evident, that things had changed, there was a more relaxed atmosphere and the feeling a new dawn had awakened; Barbadians felt as if they had taken back their country.

It is true a country prospers by its economic success, but it is also true, that a society which is worth living in; makes sure that that economic success has been gained, not with a diminution of its mores and values.

David Thompson and the DLP sought to build that society.  It was therefore necessary to share a different way of looking at Barbados.  He believed that families were the “bed-rock of society”, for in those families could be influenced the youths of the future.  No better example is there, than I will walk the way I think is right; judge me not by what I say, but by what I do; gravitas is added when the example is unspoken.

I will not seek to denigrate others, or lay false accusations without proof, as I am mindful of the fact, you cannot excoriate thousands because of opinion. . . even if firmly held.  However, it is not wise to be blinded to reality, as one hides behind a cloak of loyal Party affiliation.

If it is that Integrity Legislation can be passed in parliament; and those whose responsibility it is to administer justice, can do just that, a metamorphosis can occur in Barbados.  We can thus change the way we do things.  It will need courage, honesty and above all “integrity”, but it can only happen if the social climate is receptive to such a change.  I believe that that window of possibility is now open, the country is ready.

Are our politicians up to the challenge? can they carry forward the burning torch that was placed in their hands, by the late Prime Minister Mr David Thompson.  If they can, they will be worthy of the trust he placed in them, and Barbados will be a better place for all of us.  It is now a golden opportunity for our new Prime Minister Mr Fruendel Stuart, to carry forward what was bequeathed to him.

Their is no reason for despair or depression, just courage is required to hold that torch of David Thompson’s legacy, and you can be proud to say; I took the torch in the eye of the storm, sheltered it, and it glowed ever so brightly in the aftermath of it.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

33 responses to “The Foundation Has Been Laid; Is There A New Beginning For Barbados?”


  1. Fumble Stuart will just see out the next three years as did Sandi when the Dipper passed. He is PM by default. But should Fumble win the next election for the DEMs, it is then that you gun see de measure ah de man… Like Sandie he gun feel dat he earned de Mandate ah de People … wullass … Help we …!


  2. I have been speaking to a lot of young men since the passing of David Thompson and their positions are very clear. They prefer a younger person to be running the country at this time.
    It looked like Mia had a very good chance not against David but against any other in the DLP presently in parliament.
    Owen Arthur made the biggest mistake in his political life because he will lose if Prime Minister Freundel Stuart plays his cards right.
    The younger voters are the ones that took the DLP to victory in 2008 and that was because of David Thompson. The DLP needs them again but they want someone like Christopher Sinckler and Michael Lashley in leadership positions.
    The late David Thompson always said in interviews that the parties should give the people what they want.
    This seniority thing does not work with young people.
    Most of them said that they do not understand what Freundel Stuart is saying because of those big words he uses.


  3. Like the now Prime Minister Fruendel Stuart said”Gird your loins and go back to work”.As far as the voting public of Barbados is concerned, they know what and who they want as a Prime Minister and parlimentary representatives.Like many times before Barbados will weather the tempest.If there is on person who would be cemented in St.John as a representative, it would be Maxine McClean. Chris Sinckler is solid but Michael Lashley is questionable.Whatever happens now though,Owen should keep his mouth briddled.Mia should remember what David said to Hartley Henry”Boy my day will come!” So Mottley’s day will come.It is already written.As aside I must say to Representative Cynthia Forde that she did well as one of the persons who continue to be etremely supportive of Mia even as she is undermined by many at her right.Anyway the bell tolls for everyone!David Thompson is at rest.Now we plod on.


  4. Raymond,
    You said above that “….Michael Lashley is questionable..”. Certainly you jest. Where did you get that “fact” from. Are you aware that besides David Thompson, Lashley scored the most votes? In addition, he is a 2-term representative.
    Get your facts correct.


  5. The leadership issue within he DLP seems pretty well settled to me; so what’s all this talk about a younger leader? Mr. Stuart received the majority support of the parliamentary group and thats all that matters now.

    Politicians need to be acutely aware that the people of Barbados elect a party, not a person. Also the party with the majority support is elected with a mandate to get on with the peoples business, not to ponder the political movements necessary to ensure re-election the next time at the polls.

    My advice to PM Staurt is to concentrate with almost single purpose determination on returning Barbados to economic prosperity and stability; everything else will fall into place thereafter.

    The bi-election in St.John is sure to unfold very interestingly indeed. Maxine McClean, LeRoy McClean, Dale Lashley, George Pilgrim and Dr. Jerry Thorne are all said to been keen on contesting for this seat on behalf of the DLP. Who will be sacrificial lamb for the BLP?


  6. Even if Fumble wins the next election, it would still be by default. I want a Woman Prime Minister who would bring womanly traits to the leadership position …! But the problem is, would I appreciate a woman PM who is still competing with people like me for all the available women out there…?


  7. B&H
    Your politics is from the old school.
    The parliamentary group collectively did not defeat the BLP by a lot of votes. Reelection should be at the forefront of the Prime Minister thoughts.
    Barack Obama now find himself in that same situation where the people voted for their situation in life right now. Things are tight and they are unemployed that was all that matter.


  8. @ Charlie

    I might be old school but you’re a knucklehead if you think people don’t want politicians to focus on the peoples business once elected.

    The BLP must get used to the fact that they have along time in the political wilderness. I don’t really care one way or the other, I care for Barbados and its prosperity and financial stability.

    PM Stuart will surprise all of you nay-sayers and he will start by putting his stamp on the Cabinet and on the new way things arte going to be done in Barbados.


  9. What the hell has Fumble Stuart ever run in his life… I don’ even think that he is that hot at running his mouth … Too many of you are too easily impressed … I CRAVE DYNAMISM … HEEELLLP…!


  10. @BAFPBFP
    Are u paid to say these things or do u really think that way u say is to be taken seriously.
    Let me take a swipe at Mia Mottley. Let’s look at her record. 1) she attempted to pass gay legislation that set de country on fire. 2) she botched legislation about increase attorney general power 3) she pissed away MILLIONS on edutech and we are yet to derive any benefit from that scheme 4) she seemingly hand picked and protected both the commissioner and prison boss- my aren’t they doing well 5) she put her 750 million stamp on de new prison. 6) and let’s not forget all the “lifestyle issues”
    My point is our politicians aren’t required to perform well, just have to make us think they do. So PM Stuart doesn’t require a good track record, he just has to “look” like he is doing de job. We alllll will vote for him. Track record? Politics?? Bdos??? Stupse get real


  11. stunnaman

    You useless son of a b##th … You insult me for wanting better …? Do you think that it is okay to spot mediocrity in the rough and encourage it by voting for it because that is what we do in BIM …. Stupse get real

    Mia Mottley, Miss Crisis Manager herself is not it either … please do not reduce my sentiments to that of a political yardee…

    I CRAVE DYNAMISM … HEEELLLP…!


  12. @ BAFPFP
    Wow that hat fly on your head fast. But u don’t even realise u strenghten my point. Because u can’t name me six things she has done well all u can tell me is about “being a son of a bitch”. Words of a political yardfowl. Cluck cluck cluck
    But I’m not angry with u because u are a typical bajan. You cannot see past ure party or ure own circumstance to grasp the macro view society. I maintain( and she Miss Mottley is not alone), 90percent of parliament does not have a track record that justify elevation to any post. But its ppl like u with your small minded view have politicians playing these hide and seek games with the public.


  13. stunnaman

    Yah useless son of a b##th… Man you must learn to read first before yah write… I suspect that we on the same side, but you, yah useless son of a b##th must understand that there are some of us who take offense at being classified as “ppl like you” and “political yardfowl” … Yah useless son of a b##th…


  14. So what side is that. I’m not purporting a side I used an example. U want me use a DEM example?? Like David Estwick??? What I’m saying is u call a man Fumble and use a yard stick like “what has he run”. That makes no sense in our Cbean context. Realise that once “Fumble” can somehow get ppl to think he is doing a good job then that’s good enough. And. By the way what did Owen run before he become PM not one thing. All I’m saying ure basis for judgement. Sorry our basis for judgement makes no sense. U have judge him off perception


  15. David Estwick for Prime MInister … He know how to run a old People Clinic … and he could run he mout’ better than anyone ah dem inside dere ….!


  16. B&H
    I might be a knuckle Head but mark my word go ahead and create your own brand and the BLP will be back into government all because of your selfishness.
    You call persons who are on the ground and voicing their concerns naysayers. When governments are in power they go into cocoon made up of persons like you whose heads are either up in the clouds or buried in the sand. When they lose you are all over the place trying to create confusion to get back in power.


  17. BAFBFP
    Please give my new PM a chance nah? He is a good fella man. As quoted earlier, we vote for a party, then they choose a leader. They chose Freundel to be leader after David passed. (it still hurts to say David passed). My God. Anyway, lay off my PM please. You are condemning him widout a trial/chance to prove himself. He isn’t as easy going as you may think. He’s just a gentleman. Leave him for me pleezeeeeeeeeeeee.

    stunnaman
    Good, as usual. You always make good sense. Doan mind BAF, he just like teasin. He’s a gallas-bait. 😉


  18. I nominate Derrick Alleyne to run for DLP in St. John. Know him personally. What a gentleman. He’s a genuine fella n down to earth too.
    Vote Derrick, vote Derrick, vote Derrick, vote Derri………………


  19. @facts
    Facts! He jests at scars that never felt a wound……Without any preamble ,I am well aware of Michael Lashley’s political record but please do not forget that freedom of speech still exists.Usually I admit if I stand corrected but lets keep this clean.To explain is to expose!!There is no grattitude in politics! I am peaceful!


  20. You know something…If I ever vote again, I voting fa David Thompson.


  21. You fight among yourselves unaware of the fireworks in the BLP, which is divided into two – with absolutely no chance of healing.

    Judging from todays Sun on Saturday, Owen Arthur is now gearing to remove Arthur Holder from the Senate. But who will he replace him with?

    The record will show that Arthur Holder is a trained Attorney-at-law. He is a trained social workers. He is an educator. He is also a trained economist and was even a student of Owen Arthur.

    Poor Holder – though being the closest you could ever get to being the “PERFECT POLITICIAN” – he is now being removed from the Senate only because, as a trained economist – he would upstage Owen Arthur, who feel he is the only economist in the world.

    The talk from Parliament is that Mia is putting as much distance as she can between she and the gang of 5.

    Look friends, at a time when corruption is more of a threat to the economy than any degree of bad management, take comfort knowing that PM Stuart or Mia Mottley are not the leaders corrupt business men will be pushing to do business with.

    In short, Stuart is a symbol of integrity, honest, loyalty, decency, calm and respect. Could you ever see Stuart taking a bribe or putting money ($750,000) into his personal bank account?

    Relax!!! The leadership crisis in the BLP cannot be fixed. As PM Thompson said, this country needs unity and stability. That is Stuart. He is a unifying force.

    Stay calm and remain focusses. As Thompson would say, don’t bother about people who do not wish us well or want us to succeed.

    The division in the BLP must be the focus. The BLP has two halfs: the corrupt half that now dominates –the very one PM Thompson exposed and is bring a Prevention of Corruption Act to fix and the other half that wants to stamp-out that corruption.

    In short, the BLP’s past is wrestling with its future. That is like the forces of good and evil in Battle. But as long as corruption is evident in the BLP, the DLP is safe.

    Still, we must remember why PM Thompson was compelled to advance his Family First philosophy and why he recognised the need for sound core values, that sees corruption as a bad thing and a social ill.


  22. It appears that I may have been wrong about Freundel, apparently he is not a David Thompson surrogate after all … in fact he stood very much opposed to DT becoming leader of the Party ahead of Mascoll. So it seems that Freundel and Estwick are in the same faction and in the not too distant future Estwick could very well be returned to the Ministry of Economic affairs, where he belongs..

    LONG LIVE FREUNDEL…


  23. It is only fair – as fair as one can be in politics- to allow Prime Minister Freundel Stuart, to make his mark on this administration. It does not matter what he did, or did not say previously; he is “now” the Prime Minister of Barbados; and on that he will judged.

    To start a campaign about supposed infighting in the DLP, is just sophistry, as in reality it does not exist, only in the minds of those who are still campaigning. This is particularly reinforced as no one has called an election.

    There is no magic bullet for the Barbados economy, if there was, it would have been used in the latter years of the previous administration.

    We have a long hard road ahead, prudence, less indebtedness, by only spending what we can afford, and good forward planning, will take us some way to where we want to be. . . unnecessary infighting will not.


  24. Raymond @ 11:59 pm
    Here’s ya sista. Me de same.Long live de King David.

    Bajan Panday
    Ya come back wid guns blazing. Chawwwwwwwwwwwww. You betta run in St.John yah.

    BAFBFP
    why you doan leff my man Fumble, sorry, Freundel nah man. Ya two-mout crini-mal.

    Yardbroom
    Affable, as always.
    Blessings.


  25. In the Sun on Saturday of November 6, 2010, there was the headline, which gave the impression that Liz Thompson and Arthur Holder have resigned from the Senate because they did not want to work with Owen Arthur.

    Yet further in the article, it said that Billie Miller also placed her appointment at the disposal of Owen but he did not accept hers.

    Let’s face it Owen is removing Holder from the Senate out of FEAR that as a trained ecomomist and Arthur’s student – Holder would upstage him. Eeveryone knows that Owen feels he is the only economist on planet earth.

    But, here is the classic. Owen Arthur let fall from his mouth that there is a CONVENTION that when a leader or administration changes, persons appointed by the previous leader or administration places their appointment at the disposal of the new leader or head of the new administration.

    YOU HEAR THAT CRAP? Is Arthur senile? Isn’t he taking his mediaction.? Do you remember after the 2008 general election he went down by the same Nation Newspaper complaining that PM Thompson had put an end to an arrangment where Arthur was paying his friend $4,000 a month of the taxpayers money because – according to owen – the man “was in a tight spot” and he Owen wanted to “help him out.”

    Don’t you recall the corruption that PM Thompson exposed and put an end to? Do you really believe that Owen would be going to Parliament if PM Thompson was alive? PM Thompson literally ran Owen Arthur from Parliament. Arthur’ puny response was that Parliament was poor rakey.

    Perhaps, but honest. Even so, Isn’t Arthur now going bak to the same Parliament he said was poor rakey? YOU SEE WHY HE SHOULD TAKE HIS MEDICATION?

    But what can you say about a man who would call a press conference on the day our PM died only to read an insincere speech, causing us to see how feeble he now is–even with shaking hands and a miserable and uncomfortable look on his tired face.

    So Athur – who was helping out a friend with $4,000 monthly from the public purse is coming back to do more of the same.


  26. Out of darkness can come a light, only a flicker at first but then it can spread to illuminate all before it, like the first rays of sun at dawn.

    This is an opportunity for hard-headed thinking, when people who are brothers/sisters to the cause of a better, more prosperous Barbados, should think carefully. To those individuals who seem hell-bent on being peacocks, to flutter pretty feathers in isolation and cause discord and not be part of the team. . . sorry that selfishness and self aggrandizement should be quietly, but firmly put out to pasture.

    It does not matter if one supports the BLP or DLP, what’s required is clear thinking.

    Are the policies “once promoted” with much vigour, can they now be shown as in the long term interest of the citizens of Barbados. Do Barbadians now have a greater stake in their country.

    Is there a residue left from a previous administration, that has altered the social character for the better in Barbados.

    Is there a noticeable positive connect between big business and the ordinary Bajan; in that they are getting good value for money spent, is there a climate for such an outcome, encouraged through policies of a previous administration.

    Were measures taken during years of goverance, to ensure Barbadians have ready access to the public beaches of Barbados. It is no use talking about things, the question is, what has been done?

    Clear thinking is now required, we did not come into this world branded with DLP or BLP on our foreheads for ever, and anyone who suggest that we have, takes that as granted, or implies it, insults our intelligence.


  27. @ Yardbrooom
    Amen to that. Fully agree with what you said!


  28. BAFBFP it seems just started to follow the political climate, for how else could such garbage emanate from one mind. Based on what do you accredit the title Fumble ? Oh by the way ,there are not four persons that sit in parliament right now that have better oratorical skill than Mr. Stuart. I seriously doubt that you understand what that means , since you seem better versed in abusive language than you are at the english language


  29. Yardbroom this piece is very well balanced and thought provoking.On a point of information and not denigration , the threats of death and or personal harm made to Adrian Loveridge back then ,were made from the same computer , same IP address that supplied the B.L.P. blogs on numerous occasions to the Barbados Free Press. Yes , a sense of calm did return to our shores with the advent of the D.L.P. Was it the advent of the dems or was it the exodus of Owen Arthur ?


  30. Hi, Hamilton Hill
    With regard to Adrian Loveridge I said at the time the “allegations” of what was happening to him was wrong. . it did not make me popular, but that is life. I do not know his politics, they do not concern me, but it is easy to slide into anarchy. . . we must be mindful of that.

    I was very concerned at the time about the welfare of a young lady candidate, I will not mention her name as “perhaps” she wants the matter to rest, that I do not know; so perhaps it is best to err on the side of caution.

    There was a climate of euphoria when the DLP was elected, as if a carapace had been raised off the backs of the populace, and they were free again. Able to speak without the fear of victimization. I will not be drawn into “personal identification”, but it is honest to state a perception.


  31. While I do not pretend to know exacly which lady candidate fits your reference, I do know that as a matter of public information a gun shot sailed through the kitchen window of the home of Mrs. Irene Sandiford-Garner . The walls and front steps of her place of business were smeared with human excrement . The juxtaposition of such vile treatment and the attempt to bring public humiliation to her from no less a place than parliament ,and by no less a person than the Prime Minister (the act that convinced her to take to the hustings ) speaks to the strength ,courage and commitment of a young woman whom I would love to see in the lower chambers.Hers will be a contribution that will make St. Andrew proud. Again we may be speaking of two different people , but all of the aforementioned is a matter of public information , and needed to be again brought to the fore.


  32. BAFBFP, November 5, 2010 at 4:05 PM:

    “David Estwick for Prime MInister … He know how to run a old People Clinic … and he could run he mout’ better than anyone ah dem inside dere ….!”

    No comment.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading