← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Government has announced the long awaited CLICO Rescue Plan if we go by a Nation report. Unfortunately up to the time of writing the blog intimate details of the plan had not reached the public domain. There is a reasonable expectation among Barbadians given the number of policyholders et al who are affected that full disclosure of the rescue plan should not be an issue. In 2010 all* Barbadians should be able to logon to a website and read for themselves the details of the CLICO Rescue Plan.

BU’s position has been articulated in several blogs. Unfortunately the CLICO mess has become political football. No doubt mistakes were made in this matter, people who are learned in these matters have expressed opposing views to support the point. Looking back, the Office of Supervisor of Insurance has been found to be most incompetent. By extension the government both former and current must bear some responsibility by not being proactive dealing with CLICO matters. To the Leader of the Opposition who has been preaching that CLICO should be placed under judicial management, she knows that this does not represent the silver bullet which she has stridently represented on the political platform. How does she explain selling CLICO assets in an economy which is in recession? Wouldn’t this mean that buyers in the market with cash would be in a position to exploit the situation? Bear in mind CLICO has been a financial contributor to both political parties albeit heavily weighted in the Democratic Labour Party’s corner.

Here is what we know from scrapping the Nation Newspaper:

  1. Government’s reported rescue plan for CLICO International Life will see it add about $314 million to the country’s national debt, this amount would increase the island’s total debt by 3.4 per cent
  2. There are two key aspects to the rescue plan. The first relates to the portfolio of traditional life, pension and annuity
  3. The second aspect of the rescue relates to the Executive Flexible Premium Annuities (EFPAs), which will be separated from the rest of CLICO’s portfolio. This therefore implies that the Government of Barbados will effectively take on $314 million in Government-guaranteed debt
  4. Dr. Winston Moore, President of the Barbados Economic Society opined, “over the long term it is hoped that earnings from the sale of CLICO’s portfolio of traditional life, pension and annuity would be enough to repay the remaining amounts”
  5. Moore said it was likely that Government would raise a bond issue or borrow on the local market to fulfil the initial $44 million it planned to pay initially to individual investors of CLICO Life
  6. Key aspects of Government’s rescue plan include:
    • state takeover of CLICO assets, the sale of CLICO International Life Insurance; Government’s taking responsibility for the EFPAs;
    • no Government financial assistance for related party investments (directors, staff, management, shareholders and affiliate companies that invested in the CLICO’s EFPAs which reportedly totals $6 million);
    • no Government assistance or protection for companies and governments in Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean who bought EFPAs as the Supervisor of Insurance in Barbados had ordered that selling of EFPAs to anyone other than individual investors was illegal;
    • initial maximum payment of $25 000 to individual investors in Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean which should total $44 million; the sale of CLICO Holdings’ assets beginning in 2015 over a ten-year period.

Former Prime Minister Owen Arthur’s response has been quick “SOME PENSIONERS could find themselves penniless as a result of a reported multimillion-dollar plan to salvage personal investments in CLICO International Life Insurance Company (CIL), says former Prime Minister Owen Arthur” – Read full report

Whether you agree or disagree with what is know about the CLICO Rescue Plan a decision has at last been made and it will up to the a Thompsonless government to explain the details. No doubt the job of explaining, no disrespect to Acting Prime Minster Fruendel Stuart, will be left to Senator Darcy Boyce who we suspect has been the architect of the CLICO Rescue Plan.

The Barbados government from the start of the CLICO mess had a preference to sell affected CLICO companies as going concerns. Under judicial management a select band of people will become very rich and the transaction of necessity will be protracted. For now individual investors will have to make do with good faith payments offered.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

83 responses to “CLICO Rescue Plan Announced, The Devil Will Be In The Detail”


  1. David I will excuse you for not knowing how Government works. Not everything is sent to the Prime Minister’s Office. The pressure on the office of the Prime Minister is of such that he cannot micromanage all the ministries and agencies under his portfolio. The office of the Supervisor of Insurance is an office with full powers in law and can make it own independent decisions. He does not have to wait on the PM to advise him although he may from time to time advise him out of courtesy.

    It is expected that when he issues a directive of the kind sent to Clico that it will be treated with the seriousness with which his office is held. The problem in this case is that Parris felt that because Thompson was Clico’s Lawyer he could do what ever he wanted.

    In an attempt to deal with difficult situations in various departments the planning and Priority Committee was introduced. This allowed for a section of cabinet to meet with certain departments and dissolve difficult situation. Senior civil servants are invited to state problems in the respective departments. In was a system that worked beautifully and should be adopted by the DLP.

    Anonymous Numero wrote “What about the Corporate responsibility of Cabinet? Couldn’t the others have dealt with that alleged $314m “solution” or are they afraid to touch it”?

    I am told that Thompson had to get off his sick to come and deal with this matter because his colleagues have decided that since it his baby he would have to deal with it. Some of them have decide that since they did not get any of the sweets then they will not part of the bitter plan. Those with future plans of leading the Party will not touch it since they don’t want to carry the albatross around their necks.


  2. Now as we see the goverment right hand doesn’t always know what the left hand is doing.though we seen proof the clico disobeyed the orders of the supervisor of insurance in so doing i think that make clico liable for those policies and should be made to pay out. now as for blp blame to follow all it will take is a letter ( if one was written) to the pm as the finance minister or pm for blame to flow since they did nothing during the time. until that time ( if the letter was written) which maybe be quick to come or never come all depends on if there was a letter there is no blp blame for this. now as clico lawyer i am sure the current pm was aware of the correspondence so i guess he or parris should explain why the polices where sold ignoring the order.


  3. @anthony

    Did you listen to the interview with President of CLICO Life on VOB today? He read from correspondence which the Nation did not publish which shows there was dialogue between CIL and the Office of Insurance on the matter.


  4. What was the outcome of the hardwood housing audit and the audit of the UDC, Why have heard nothing about these?


  5. Didn’t Thompson tell us that his doctors would comment on his condition ths week. We are now half way into the week and have heard nothing as yet. What’s happening????


  6. no i didn’t david. do you have a recording or summary for it ?


  7. @anthony

    Unfortunately no, perhaps if you search the vob website or listen to the upcoming news it will be carried.


  8. @Royalrumble said”If the BLP, upon coming to office after the next election does not do something about this matter Barbadians’ confidence in the political system would be seriously damaged. Confidence in politicians will be lost ”

    Haha. What rock you been hiding under? Barbadians confidence was lost sometime ago, if you want it restored then bring Transparency, Accountability and Integrity Legislation, with ‘teet’.

    Nothing else will do.

    Confidence bollocks.


  9. And to make it crystal clear. The average Barbaidan thinks that politicians are crooks.

    I am not saying that they are, merely explaining what the average Barbadians thinks.


  10. David; You said above “Did you listen to the interview with President of CLICO Life on VOB today? He read from correspondence which the Nation did not publish which shows there was dialogue between CIL and the Office of Insurance on the matter.”

    Was it on the evening news? I listened midday and there was no such news and the VOB webpage does not mention it? Perhaps it will appear on the webpage tomorrow?

    Anyhow. It was easy to predict that there must have been dialogue between the SOI and Clico management on the matter, particularly on the first letter which appears to have been on an easily corrected small matter that it would have been stupid of Clico management to ignore. I would therefore not be surprised if Clico could prove that there was some accomodation made on that score with the SOI. Re. the other letter published by the Nation, and given the tone of that letter and the substantive rationale given for the SOI’s order to cease and desist from selling the efpa’s and that the letter did not even mention the grounds for stopping sale of the epa’s as given in the first letter, It is easy to deduce that the SOI made an accomodation with Clico on the first matter but I would be very surprised if he gave Clico accomodation on the second matter.

    But I await either your recollections on the thrust of the Interview today or its publication tomorrow or later to check that.

    In addition, I am waiting with bated breath to see if CLICO gives (or the SOI leaks) documented evidence that the former PM was apprised of the cease and desist order around the time it was made and/or any documented reaction he made to it. You see, CLICO will have a vested interest in proving that the former PM was involved and the SOI or his sympathizers may consider that it might be in his best interests to prove that he indeed took action and informed a higher authority.

    Failing such disclosures one will have to conclude that there is no evidence linking the former PM with the apparent refusal of Clico to accede to the orders of the SOI.

    Anyhow, I would expect that there will be many further disclosures as people try to shift blame for the reported actions of this DLP administration that are almost sure to damage Barbados’ good name and finances substantially in the near future.

    The true story will come out and it is not likely to be pretty.


  11. Donald Duck esq; I think this affair has now gone pass the matter of the PM’s health problem, per se. Hurricane winds are blowing in a different direction.


  12. @checkit-out

    It was on the 5.30Pm VOB newscast.

    President of CIL Geofrey Brewster admitted the SOI expressed concern that the EFAP represented too heavy a mix in the CLICO portfolio. The company agreed and designed new products subsequently which also addressed the SOI concern that the EFAP was not to be issued to businesses. The president advised that CLICO redesigned the annuity to comply with SOI request. We are paraphrasing here.


  13. Hi David; Thanks. Did he also address the concern that Trinidad has voiced about the EFPA’s being a Ponzi scheme?


  14. No checkit-it, the news piece concentrated on Brewster’s response to the SOI which was highlighted in the Nation.


  15. Why is it the Advocate has carried nothing on the Government’s bail out plan for clico Barbados?


  16. ok from that article i gather clico sold some efpa to companies. they were orginal suppose to only sell to people since the form had name sex age etc. when sent to supervisor of insurance. those where sold illegal. ( ie they are liable). they SOI then said they should not be sold. and they went back and forth and seems clico was still selling them. clico then wrote a new policy other the efpa for company calling it advance performance policy. the APP was then appove for use by the SOI. Then Clico went to offer the NIB the EFPA which was illegal at and at the time since they had the APP and SOI responded that no EFPA are to be sold to companies. so i say that clico just hung themselves out to dry since they where still trying to sell the EFPA to companies long after SOI told them to stop. As for liabilities the Clico admit that it sold efpa to companies . the SOI took stance that it should not be sold. Clico then wrote a new policy for companies calling it the APP. took almost 2 year for approval etc. saying it would transfer then upon time for renewal . until that time clico is liable for the time after that time clico is still liable. since clico should of cancelled those policies immediately after SOI made them illegal. so long and short if you see class action suit from companies well government been warned.


  17. Anthony; Which article are you paraphrasing above? Grateful if you would let us know where we can find the original article.

    David: The article by Kammie Holder in today’s Nation Online (I haven’t seen the paper edition yet) seems to make a number of suggestions that CLICO was acting above board and selling 2 efpa type policies, one to individuals and one to institutions. the info from the Oversight Committee seems to suggest that the SOI had not approved the one for Institutions? It also appears to suggest that CLICO was acting contrary to the directives of the SOI prior to 2008 re. the sale of the efpas to institutions. Here’s the article

    http://www.nationnews.com/articles/view/above-board/

    The question still remains as to if the Government will legally be liable for the efpa’s sold to institutions?


  18. David; I just found a short clip of the interview that Stetson Babb had yesterday afternoon with the CLICO president. It is obviously only a short portion of the whole interview (I wonder why?). The clip, taken by itself, seems to suggest that it was only in February 2008 that the SOI approved the “EFPA” for Institutions.

    This thing is still murky. Does it mean that the Institutional EFPA’s were only approved after the DLP came into power? Someone like Kammie Holder or the guy at Barbados Today needs to marshall their forces and sources to do some detailed articles on the matter and clarify the issues.

    The VOB webpage also indicates that the PM’s local physician will be making a statement on the PM’s health at 11.00 am today on VOB.


  19. @checkit- out

    today nation article
    http://www.nationnews.com/articles/view/above-board/
    and yesturday own
    http://www.nationnews.com/articles/view/clico-warned/
    though i think the picture caption in printed article offered more substance the body of the articles.

    the paper edition had a photo of the approval of the APP for businesses by SOI. Yesterday paper picture states why SOI taught that the policy was for individual only and that all policy to companies etc should have been withdrawn. They also state in the paper that clico would transfer the cooperate EFPA to APP upon renewals. today’s paper has a letter for SOI to the NIB advising them that EFPA are not for companies. So i can assume that Clico doesn’t understand what cease and desist selling it to companies etc. mean. If they had offered them APP would be more understandable but since it was EFPA it proves Clico just ignored the SOI. so how i see it is that clico ignored SOI and still sold EFPA and didn’t cancel the one they where told to cancel. so is clico liable for them yes. will we have to also repay these polices well we might have another lawsuit for that.


  20. @ checkit out

    EFPA was never approve for institution according the SOI letter in FEB in today papers. the APP was approved which was similar to the EFPA. the SOI wrote in oct to NIB that is wasn’t approved. so why was clico trying to sell NIB the EFPA when they had the APP. all looks really fuzzy to me. but if NIB had invested guess the government might have bailed out everyone then.


  21. If anyone needed proof that there was something sinister about the goings on at Clico following the election of 2008 it can be found in Mr. Geoffrey Brewster’s (President of Clico) comments during his interview.

    Mr. Brewster said “On February 11, 2008, the Supervisor of Insurance responded to me indicating that the application for an annuity, which we call an advance performance policy, was approved. Brewster said that “the move effectively separated the individual product from that offered to corporation”.

    Note fellow bloggers that from 2005 the SOI has been denying the sale of this product to corporations. Only when the DLP took office in January of 2008 did the change of heart apparently came, February 11, 2008, four days short of the DLP’d first month in office.

    So under the Owen administration Clico couldn’t get this crooked policy through until Thompson, Parris friend, took over. Lets us not forget that Cow Williams said the same thing with respect to the transfer of land. Cow said that for eleven years he was trying to get over 70 acres land transferred from agriculture to housing and in three months of a DLP Government he was able to effect the transfer and without the use of the Agriculture Protection Act as promised by the DLP.

    I say without apology that something stinks about Thompson’s role in the whole Clico affair. He, Parris ,Thornhill and Duprey stole the clients money from Clico and now the taxpayers are being ask to pay it back – over $314 million of it. They must be lock to hell up for it.

    The way Thompson treated the SOI in this matter has left him in a state of mental depression to the point where he can no longer function in his job. If you doubt me check with his family and see. I am reliably inform that whenever Mr. Belgrave sees Thompson or Parris on TV he screams “turn it off turn it off” and starts to vomit. This is awful.

    But revenge is the Lord’s and Thompson will have is day in the presence of the Lord, not that he believes in or cares about God the creator. I hope he can answers for is wicked actions.


  22. How many person remember the way Thompson when after the former president of the City of Bridgetown Credit Union, Ms Lynette Holder when made the sensible move to get their money out of Clico. Had she not done that then members of that Credit Union would now be in the same problem as BARP.

    COB’s members should thanking Ms. Holder now.


  23. Up to now the EFPA hasn’t been approved for businesses . the APP has. so why was the EFPA being offered to the NIB when the APP was supposed to be. like I said before they defend nothing just left more holes open for people to question what was really happening at clico.


  24. Just heard Thompson’s physician. Nothing new. Just another PR exercice. Thompson has Pancreatic cancer and is unlikely to ever lead this country effectively again. The amount of body mass that the PM has lost is a clear sign that his life expectancy is critically short. I really wish him the best.

    Thompson’s clucthing on to the seat of power at this time is merely to cover up the criminal tracks left open and to stear the DLP into a safe zone, an act of impossibility.


  25. BLP vultures smelling blood. Election campaigning in overdrive.

    Let them gather.


  26. Royal Rumble
    Nothing new indeed. We advanced the diagnosis and prognosis on BU accurately months ago

    HH you can go canvass for the St John seat freely now.


  27. @Royal Rumble,

    You said

    “Note fellow bloggers that from 2005 the SOI has been denying the sale of this product to corporations.”

    Why then did the BLP government allow Clico to keep selling these policies to non-individuals, if the SOI had said they should not? Is it that the government did not know this was taking place?


  28. Royal Rumble; Your analyses above seem a bit harsh but are difficult to fault on a substantive basis when all the known facts are juxtaposed and analysed.

    Any thoughts on why the honourable Michael Lashley was chosen as agAG for the duration of the PM’s current trip to NY although it has been put in the public domain that the person who acted in that post earlier was quite willing to continue? Any ideas on how that appointment fits into the web of circumstances surrounding the maintenance of a legacy and perhaps further protection of CLICO?


  29. Please read my party’s 9-point plan for clico.This was given to 9 major media houses in trinidad 2 weeks ago.I wonder why they are so scared to publish it?This is press freedom for your money.A legitimate party that contested the may 24 election issues a news release and all the media houses block it – a total blackout.Why?


  30. Enoch John; What is your party? and where can we get a copy of your 9-point plan for CLICO. I would really like to see it?


  31. indeed. what the 9 point plan . Even if the normal media blanks you Social media can still carry your message across sometime way better than normal media would have ever had.


  32. Enoch John; Point me to it; Please


  33. Here is the note received from Enoch John. Have to confess not ever hearing of this party.

     

    Hi David,

    Because Clico/CL Financial is such an integral part of our socio-economic landscape, any blueprint for the solution of the "Clico Fiasco" must, as a necessary take cognizance of the following factors:-

    [1] No policy holder/investor must suffer loss.

    [2]No employee of Clico/cl financial must be retrenched,especially as it pertains to Trinidad and Tobago and Caricom.

    [3] Group members must,as a necessity, return to profitability ASAP

    [4]All former directors of Group should be called upon to make substantial contributions to a fund to be established from which interest is to be paid to policyholders.It is unconscionable that such directors will not come forward and make restitution.

    [5]Gov’t must contribute to such a fund.

    [6]As group returns to profitability, part of their profits must be set aside to pay policyholders.

    [7]Group must be kept intact.No auctioning of parts to private buyers as far as is possible.

    [8]Best management to be made available to group.

    [9]Group employees to be given option of acquiring shares presently taken over by Gov’t after the collapse of Clico.

    Enoch John is the political leader of the National Democratic Organization .He has also written a solution to the Wall Street crisis which can be read in the REDROOM.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading