← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Corey Weekes MSc, CPIM, CIRM, CSCP - Operations/Supply Chain Management Consultant and Director of Tropique Wines
Submitted by Corey Weekes MSc, CPIM, CIRM, CSCP – Operations Supply Chain Management Consultant and Director of Tropique Wines

As the right honourable Prime Minister indicated in his latest budget speech, we are experiencing very difficult times, and now more than ever, it is important to embark on strategies that generate sustained future growth in exports and foreign exchange. The strategy outlined in this article is penned with the idea of propelling the country on such a journey. It relates to the question of how we can bolster our manufacturing sector for greater foreign export earnings

Despite the policies of several governments, the challenge of increasing manufacturing’s contribution to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) remains. A review of central bank reports leads one to the conclusion that successful manufacturing in Barbados is a mirage, with no future in today’s apparent world of services. But, before we detrimentally forecast this sector’s demise, let’s examine a model of success that continues in this area, and serves as a platform for sectoral development.

I have written before that the success of the medical device manufacturer, Lenstec Barbados Inc, is no accident, and has precedence for where team Barbados’s focus should be. The initial attractiveness of Barbados as a destination for manufacturing foreign direct investment (FDI) is very much present, in the form of low tax rates and duty-free material access etc, as found in the international business company act. These policies are the first important pillar for a successful manufacturing strategy, and remain laudable and attractive, but by themselves, are not enough to lure industrial FDI en masse.

What has attracted and maintained Lenstec Barbados Inc, when other large manufacturing companies e.g. Intel have left, is the fact that the majority of critical elements needed for successful manufacturing, and more importantly supply chain management, remain present today. Make no mistake, no manufacturing enterprise will succeed and grow in the long term, unless the elements of successful manufacturing supply chain management exist. To fully appreciate this we need to look at the business of manufacturing and its supply chain. Raw material inputs have to be affordably procured and moved to a production location, where skilled, affordable labor and facilities convert inputs to products. Importantly, these products have to be distributed quickly and efficiently across the globe. Yes globally, a market of 280,000 can hardly sustain the production volumes needed to properly amortize capital purchases found in significant manufacturing. Unless we are processing food and beverages which benefit from the effects of repeat local consumption. After all, many of us enjoy a good Banks beer more than once per year.

This highlights the second pillar of our manufacturing policy which is to focus on attracting an industry with global appeal and not only serve a local market base. Small business and small business incentives should always be encouraged, but to generate significant FDI inflows and foreign exchange, the focus has to be on a global industry from the outset. Lenstec Barbados Inc has a global focus as it ships its medical devices world-wide from its Barbados location.

This leads us to the third pillar of the manufacturing policy, which is the provision of an efficient logistics environment to the customer base. The best designed and made product is useless if it can’t reach the target market. Less-than-container load (LCL), Full-container-load (FCL), airfreight and parcel lanes and capacity are crucial. We can have trade agreements with Venezuela and Colombia for example, and future agreements with Nigeria, but without efficient freight lanes to these countries, no products will move there. Try importing apparently cheaper items from Brazil as opposed to Florida, and we will experience the problem of freight lane availability first hand. This is a conundrum faced by local furniture manufacturers, who struggle with getting their products throughout the Caribbean, despite favorable Caribbean trading arrangements, and obviously good products. With poor freight lanes e.g. to Dominica, then marketing a high quality mahogany set to potential customers becomes a futile exercise, limiting the producer to the small local market. This is also the problem that a local manufacturer faces when trying to export hard goods to the dispersed Barbadian Diaspora.

So how does Lenstec do it?

It ships in high densities, hence affordable unit shipping costs, via global parcel carriers e.g. DHL and FedEx. These logistics providers are already established, and have efficient global freight networks to distribute products to markets within 1-5 business days. Importantly, we must provide significant incentives for shipping, air cargo, and parcel companies here to continue and expand the provision of freight lanes into and out of Barbados. This is as vital to a manufacturing industry as airlift from key markets is to the tourism industry.

The fourth pillar where attention is needed, is in the creation of an industrial clustering effect, to propel a manufacturing sector with spill over impacts to other aspects of the economy. This is a comprehensive strategy which evolves over time, but is also an important aspect in maintaining an environment where industry can source softer attributes needed for sustained competitiveness. This can be as simple as dedicated bus services to the industrial park where the industry is located so employees move to and from work easily, or daycare facilities within the industrial park. It can also extend to providing specialised courses at the Community College or Samuel Jackman Prescod Polytechnic with curriculum developed by the industry, to ensure that the workforce is skilled and trained in areas the industry seeks. Or, it can be offering incentives for existing logistics and brokerage companies to locate within the industrial park for obvious industrial synergies. Or rebates given to manufacturers who utilise local service companies in the provision of packaging items, advertising and marketing services etc

So how do these suggestions all come together to form a comprehensive manufacturing policy for Barbados’s export growth?

Let us consider an approach where we aggressively seek to attract more medical device companies in the $5-25 million USD revenue range, making products that can shipped globally in high densities, thereby leveraging airfreight and parcel companies e.g. DHL and FedEx for their global distribution. Companies such as Cool Eyes and MicroLites Scientific out of Canada and tens of others across North America. IBC incentives are favourable and should even be bolstered by additional incentives which may include subsidised utilities etc to make Barbados very attractive to this industry. The location for these companies in the cluster could be Grantley Adams Industrial Estate, where close proximity to the airport location, facilitates easy movement of management personnel and extended pickup window times for export bound air cargo or parcel shipments. As the fourth pillar suggests, the industrial park should be served via a small bus terminal with direct routes to key urban areas in Barbados, and other ancillary facilities e.g. daycare, which ensure labour can move easily to and from the location and the companies should benefit from employee training grants etc, provided they work with tertiary institutions on island to develop the curriculum necessary for labor training needed in the industry. It is agreed that times are indeed challenging, and solutions will be difficult and costly to implement, but successful journeys always begin with one step.

Corey Weekes MSc, CPIM, CIRM, CSCP is an Operations/Supply Chain Management Consultant and Director of Tropique Wines. He can be reached at coreyweekes@hotmail.com

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


  1. Dear Corey you wrote “CPIM, CIRM, CSCP”

    And they must be important or you would not have written them but me and the rest of the BU family do not know what those letters mean.

    Will you please tell us what they mean?

    Thanks.


  2. The issue which may not have been clearly addressed in the submission is the known high labour cost in Barbados and this is despite the inherent advantages which Barbados offers in other areas of operations. Would like to have this aspect further discussed because as we all known labour cost represent the single highest cost on the expense sheet.


  3. Hi David

    Yes, Barbados’ labour cost is not the cheapest, but when a patient is spending hundreds or thousands of dollars to be fitted with a medical devices that is a fraction of the cost of the operation, then the labor cost component is insignificant. Barbados is not a location for mass market goods but specialised items like medical devices where the labour cost component of the total patient spend etc is very small. This industry is also recession proof, unlike consumer goods production


  4. Point taken Corey!

    You have provided a lot to chew on. While your strategy is not novel it is the lethargy which successive governments have shown in a changing market that threatens to operationalize such an effort.

    Have you emailed this submission to the relevant government ministry, maybe Invest Barbados led by Wayne Kirton?


  5. How would established international companies be able to justify this outsourcing, to countries like Barbados, in the present environment?

    David, how can one speak of high labour cost and not say a word about the cost of living or inflation in Barbados.
    Workers have to live too.


  6. Underpaid

    All the inputs which make-up high labour cost was implied in the reference:-)

    But you are right to put it on the table. Remember Corey countered the high labour cost argument above.

    We leave the other part of your comment to Corey who whoever to answer.


  7. I would think that recession proof industries would be the last to outsource.
    If high cost labour is not a deterrent to these industries, then Barbados would have to offer some massive concessions, which would then dilute any benefits gained.


  8. Underpaid…all valid points, several things to consider though is that the labour cost in Barbados is still much lower for this type of labour than it is in USA, Canada and UK especially when you consider to State, Federal Taxes, Workers Comp and benefits etc. Also corporate tax is significantly less for IBCs when compared to N America and UK and with other items like duty free access and training grants it MAY be possible to make a case for some companies setting up here Not all…but certainly some.


  9. Nice choice of industries.

    For the record Intel closed its doors for three combined reasons.
    1. A decision to restructure (a choice had to be made between keeping either Adams Castle or Manila)
    2. The loss of fiscal incentives, Intel having passed the grace period
    3. Barrows comments (true as they were) about Reagon’s cowboy style did not help.
    Phew..was carrying that around for a while now I feel renewed


  10. Everything that was said was well said
    Now let’s tackle some deeper issues. With all of the services that Barbados has to offer in promoting foreign exchange, they all are designed to provide for foreign interests; even the level and type of training provided by UWI. What concerns me more than the attracting of big foreign concerns is the development of indigenous industries.

    So let’s add on to what has already been stated but this chapter is designed for the development of local industries to sell products to the rest of the world.

    1. That cultural industries be seriously considered as potential earners of foreign exchange.
    2. That the National Cultural Foundation be developed into the selling arm of the indigenous “MICRO INDUSTRIALISTS”
    3. That the NCF board and staff be replaced/outfitted with sales oriented sharks armed with the entrepreneurial instincts to take what is available, package it and SELL (not market, Barbados is packed to capacity with marketers) these products to the rest of the world.
    4. (This means) That the UWI should implement with haste an intensive training program to develop world class efficient sellers. And in the event that we cannot supply enough of the right breed then we import the stock.
    5. Implement the “Action Agenda”. That is :- focus on developing, rewarding and giving effect to those who DESIGN, PRODUCE, SELL. Let the consultants and administrators take a back seat. They are very expensive.. ‘nuff said.
    6. Arm all of the overseas missions with these trained operatives. Their mission to seek out every possible opportunity to sell Barbadiana in every nook and cranny. To go where no Barbadian has gone before.
    7. SELL SELL SELL. Every CEO must be a seller. Every Board must be packed with sellers. Every student in every class room from kindergarten to tertiary should be exposed to the fine art of selling. The ‘mericans are the best sellers in the world. Barbados, with a national plan could go one further. Selling creates markets where non previously existed. Selling is measurable and good sellers should be the most revered and best rewarded of all Barbadians.

    This is the “Action Agenda”.
    ©BAFBFP 2009

    Hah..!


  11. @BAFBFP: “What concerns me more than the attracting of big foreign concerns is the development of indigenous industries.

    Amen!!!

    (Seriously.)


  12. Agreed BAFBFP but one appears to be medium to long term and the other is short term. Both doable don’t you think?


  13. @David: “Agreed BAFBFP but one appears to be medium to long term and the other is short term. Both doable don’t you think?

    But David et al…

    If one is being paid good money in the short term to “do tricks”, how many “ones” think in the medium to long term?

    (Please forgive me for the above allusion. It’s intentional, but also meant to frame and present a serious question.)


  14. But Chris is it not the way we do business today?

    Example:

    Don’t we reward CEO’s for short term performance at the expense often times of the medium and long term performance of the entity?

    Now you want to rework the thinking?


  15. @David: “…is it not the way we do business today?

    It’s the way *most* do business today…

    Both the exploiters, and perhaps most pathetically, the exploited…

    @David: “Now you want to rework the thinking?

    It would seem to be a reasonable and logical response for those many who have the most to gain from changing the game’s rules…

    But not, of course, a comforting thought for those few who have the most to lose (or, more accurately, who might stop gaining) if there were changes to how things currently are…

    Hmmmm….


  16. @BAFBFP – I agree with you on the idea of developing the cultural industry in Barbados as a source of foreign exchange, as a matter of fact i have a submission on the very same issue next week. Attracting foreign companies to manufacture in Barbados is not the only solution, but definitely helps in the short term in that these companies are already in the customer markets and ahead on the market penetration curve as opposed to a local company looking to grow in a new foreign market (significant marketing and advertising spend) which takes years in some instances


  17. Chris you an’ David pun ah ivy league level that got me in trouble. So I gun tackle a response tomorrow. Sleep tight!


  18. […] Government Lead Strategy For Expanding The Manufacturing Sector In … Share and […]


  19. CW
    When you work for a company that spends 6 million US dollars on capital works and shuts down six months after the work is completed, laying off one thousand workers with a month’s notice, you tend to treat to alternative approaches to industrialisation with a bit more urgency. Developing/penetrating markets is the strategy. You say take out advertising, I say drop special ops on the ground behind enemy lines. That is the key to the “Action Agenda”. Not money, just share talent and effort.

    © BAFBFP 2009

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading