Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The following Letter to the Editor appears in today’s Nation Newspaper and sums-up the concern of many residents in St. Peter, the BU family and beyond regarding the reckless development on the way in the North. We thought that there would have been an abatement of these kind of projects.

Is it business as usual?

Hit marina bid for six!
Published on: 9/4/08.

THE FISHING VILLAGE of Six Men’s, located on the West Coast in St Peter, is a unique district, with a most peculiar history. It developed as a fishing village around the end of the 19th century when its population comprised just a few families, such as the Gibbonses, the Greaveses, and the Broomeses. Quite a few of the present residents are descended from these families.

That a lady is now claiming to be the heir and rightful owner of this land I find most interesting, since this land has been a matter of dispute for some considerable time, spanning two consecutive Governments. This person only surfaced in February of this year, along with her lawyer, claiming to have the title deed to the lands known as Six Men’s. The validity of these claims is yet to be authenticated.

For too long the people of Six Men’s have been tossed around. Government after Government has promised to develop the area, but there has always been what seemed to be a legitimate excuse why these developments for the residents never came to fruition. Now we are hearing that developers are seeking to build another marina just to the south of Six Men’s, which will ultimately impact on this historic fishing village.

I am yet to see an impact study or an environmental report showing how this proposed marina, to be located just north of the present Port St Charles Marina, will affect the residents of Six Men’s, especially as it relates to our use of the beach for fishing and recreational purposes.

It is my understanding that a meeting held by these developers professed to have invited residents of Six Men’s to discuss this marina project. However, not one invitation was sent out to residents and certainly no person from the area attended. This was clearly a public relations ploy to convince the authorities that the interests of these residents were being considered.

It would be a sad day if Government gives the all-clear for this marina to be built, as it would mean the end to what beach we now have left and would certainly rob us and future generations of a proper recreation area where families can go and enjoy the natural and medicinal value of the sea.

I shall be seeking the support of Six Men’s residents and all concerned Barbadians, here and abroad, to lodge a formal petition against the building of this marina. Let us continue to be strict guardians of our heritage and firm craftsmen of our fate.

– FRANK GILKES


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

36 responses to “West Coast Challenge”


  1. Frank
    I thought that that marina idea was abandoned with the change of government. Didn’t Mr. Benn prior to the elections at a town hall meeting down there promised that if his party was successful at the polls there will be no marina?
    You poeple in Six Mens are being taken for a bumpy ride. Please don’t except it ; no broken promises.


  2. It’s not only the people in Six Mens being taken for a bumby ride. It is the whole country.

    Frank, arrange something and let us know. I am on the South Coast but I will come west with all my friends who oppose this marina. Don’t dally.


  3. On June 12th at 4.58 p.m. I was making the same comment and asking the same questions. The more we change; the more we remain the same. DLP where is the integraty? Can we not take your word anymore? You’re beginning to disappoint this nation and your government is too young for that. For me it was only in the last 5 yrs or so that the Owen Arthur government got really reckless but you’re showing signs very early. keep it up and you wouldn’t even do 5 yrs. The people of this country put up with the evil of the previous government but it tought us a lesson, never to accept maltreatment from politicians anymore. A WORD TO THE WISE>


  4. I am not a lawyer and I hold no ‘brief’ for anybody, nor do I have any opinion (one way or the other) on this Marina business.

    What I will say is this: Barbados either has to develop projects that are going to take the country forward … or not. If “not” the country is going to fall into oblivion as other countries in the area pass us.

    We DO have a big problem because, with 14 x 21 miles to work with there simply isn’t much land mass to work with. It is clear, then, that to use what IS available, is going to cause discomfort to some people.

    What I’m saying is, whatever projects are proposed … they need to be considered in a level-headed way, balancing emotion and intellect… “thinking” with both our head and our heart.


  5. Centipede
    Even what you’re saying I agree with, the fact is that prior to the election, while canvassing, Mr Benn gave the people of Six Mens his word that if his party is successful, the marina issue is no more and we believed him. We know or should I say knew him to be a man of integrety. Unless he can come back to us and Explain himself, he has lose our respect.


  6. For him OF COURSE


  7. Problem is that too many people in authority feel that the authority gives them the right to determine what is best for the people without an understanding of what the people want.

    I would like to take this opportunity to remind readers that a lot of corruption is going on in this country and that we should take a stand against things like this because this is where the corruption is.

    The key is to learn how to recognise where the corruption is while it is going on and not when it is a ‘fait accompli’, then to come back in fora like these to complain.

    It is like cleaning your house, get rid of all the places where cockroaches could hide and ants can nest. Let me remind you that we do this daily to make sure. Hope you get the drift because corruption may not be in all of them but we need to make sure.

    Furthermore this calls for action, if only to allow the residents of Six Mens to have their say. Communities should support communities, so therefore I am calling on all communities to come out in support of the Six Mens Community; New Orleans, Pinelands, Trents, Haynesville, Gall Hill, Brandons, Hoyte’s Village. This is a network that needs to happen.

    Not telling you to go out there to lick down and break down but to lend support to the residents desire to be heard. Keep the focus in mind; it is NOT THE OUTCOME that is in focus here, IT IS FOR CITIZENS TO BE HEARD (not shouting, just emphasis) and that is the first principle of democracy. How else can you come to a conclusion about anything that includes everybody without everybody’s input into what affects them?


  8. To Sen Benn
    We the people of St. Peter know you as a decent, honest man. We know you were very reluctant to get into active politics for many years. That’s why when you got involved and you came to us and gave us your word, we believed you. Are you turning your back on us now? Has politics changed the man that we know for so many years? The young people mentor you, are you prepared to let them down? Come to grips with yourself, ask yourself if it is worth it and do the right thing. PLEASE. Don’t get greedy.


  9. @ Centipede,

    While I agree with you, we have a saying that it is not what you do but how you do it. Give people a hearing. Sometimes you will find that you can work with it by solving mutual problems and even gaining concessions, if people are talking.


  10. By law, every five years, a Physical Development Plan is to be presented to Parliament for adoption.

    This plan is developed in consultation with the people. I’ll see if the Town Planning Act is on line and if I can copy and paste what it says about the plan.

    The plan tells the Government what is and what is not acceptable and defines what it has the authority to work on over the five year period for which the plan is in force.

    The situation we are in today arises from the utter corruption of this process.

    We should not be only be talking about picketing over this one project at Six Mens.

    We should be talking about picketing to make the Government explain their actions.

    Remember, this party walked out of the house and was absent in 2007 when the process which should have occurred in 1998 happened. Since 1998 the country has operated without either plan.

    No discussion or debate ensued at the last sitting of the house.

    The absentees then signed the result into law within months of the non-event.

    What we should be doing is picking to pieces the PDP and asking these guys what each one’s position is on any project.

    They missed the opportunity to tell us at Christmas.

    These guys now have probably approved Greenland, Westmoreland, Apes Hill, Farmers among other projects and I am willing to bet Six Men’s is somewhere in there too.


  11. @ John, You telling me that since 1966 and except for the past 10 years, the people of Barbados was consulted on a physical development plan?

    I missed something here because I only know about an invitation to view it after the fact… and I hope that consult don’t mean going to look at it in the library and submit comments? That is not consultation.

    Let me help you here with the Town & Country Planning Act:
    http://www.caricomlaw.org/doc.php?id=611

  12. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar

    FRANK

    Organise something. I will bring down the family and support whatever it is that is put in place to counter this proposal.

    This is bare foolishness. I was under the impression that all this was done with since the change of Govt. but It looks like I was wrong.


  13. They had an invitation to comment in the paper in 1997. They gave people a week or two to procure a copy, read the couple of hundred pages and study the maps and then write in with comments.

    Then in 1998, Carl Ince chaired the public consultations over a one week period. It was advertised in the paper.

    I went to the last one at Princess Margaret School. Mr. Ince indicated that this one was the best attended of the five he had chaired that week.

    I reckoned about 20 people.

    We are partly to blame, but the following month the Mullins Bay controversy erupted and I went to Queen College Hall one night at which there was standing room only.

    People were vex as hell. Then it petered out.

    I have not seen the report of Mr. Ince published in which I could see what the detailed objections/support was.

    Hopefully it will be made available in the “fullness of time” as Sir Humphrey would say in “Yes Prime Minister”.

    The 1998 consultation I guess is the one which supports the 2007 passage or non passage in Parliament.

    The current TCPO site says the new PDP is not in effect but as to whether the site needs an update or this is really the case, I can only guess.


  14. Here is what I got from the Town Planning site.

    “The first Physical Development Plan for Barbados was published in 1970 and came into operation in 1977. The second plan, amended in 1983, came into operation in 1991. The third Physical Development Plan was amended in 2003 and is yet to be formally adopted. ”

    The Town Planning act dates from the 60’s so over the past 40 or so years we have managed two with a third in process.


  15. ROK

    I can’t copy and paste from this document on this site but check out the very start of the act where the plan is defined between paragraphs 5 and 12.

    Section 11 has the five year review.

    Looks like the only time the law was actually followed was in the preparation of the 1970 plan, two years after the law came into effect and within the four year period stipulated.

    So the DLP have shown on one occasion that they do actually know what to do where the law is concerned!!

    The Bees are yet to step up to the plate.

    Since then well ……….


  16. There is no commitment to consult in this legislation. Not seeing it. Also looks like the Town Planner is charged to produce the document.

    Check and see that after it is released by the Town Planner it should be made available for comment by public inspection or by sale and all.

    It speaks of objections and addressing objections but the Town Planner has no duty to consult. Objections shall be heard. There is a big difference. Consultations are oral. The objections are written.

    If Carl Ince was called upon to chair consultations then that was a Government initiative. Maybe part of the beginning of the Arthur politics of inclusion strategies. It has not happened since.

    Are we really to blame? I understand what you are saying but these things call for leadership and effort and nobody don’t pay you for the time you would need to do the research and keep the fire going.

    This kind of thing is not encouraged in Barbados. You see that the Intervenors did not get a cent in compensation. What message did that send to people like yourself that would be glad to commit to community work? If you get funding from an agency, they don’t want to give you any money at all for administration.

    But we are addressing these problems and soon this will be a thing of the past. Can’t divulge any more just yet.


  17. @ROK: “Also looks like the Town Planner is charged to produce the document.”

    Please me please observe that it *is* acceptable for a Government unit et al to (reasonably) charge for the copying and *re-production* of a document.

    However, importantly, once someone has paid this re-production charge, there is nothing stopping those who have paid for the copy of the *public* document from reproducing it and distributing it themselves…

    Like, lets say, scanning it and making it available on the Internet…

    Just putting that out there…


  18. Sigh… To my above…

    s/Please me please observe/Let me please observe/


  19. @Chris,

    In this country, consultation is a new thing. No legislation is interpreted with the concept of consultation unless it is specifically spelt out in the legislation. That is a discretion exercised or not exercised depending on the philosophy of the office holder.


  20. @ROK… “In this country, consultation is a new thing.”

    With the greatest of respect… I’m not even talking about consultation here — simply knowledge…

    There are things known as Statutory Instruments (SIs) here in Barbados and elsewhere, which are used to apply deltas (read: changes) to the Laws.

    Thusly, even if we (and others) are able to download the Acts, we don’t actually have complete knowledge of the Laws, because they’ve been changed by way of the SIs.

    For example, can anyone tell me what S.I. 96# says? How about S.I. 1# through S.I. 95#?

    IMHO, we’re not yet at the point of consultation… We’re not yet even at the point of knowing (let alone understanding) our own Laws…

    (IMHO)…


  21. Correct


  22. … we have alot of growing up to do before we can honestly call ourselves citizens of our country.


  23. A future PDC Government shall, among other things, do the following:

    1) Abolish ALL Taxation;

    2) Abolish ALL Interest Rates;

    3) Abolish ALL Exchange Rates Parities with the Barbados Dollar;

    4) Abolish ALL Motor Vehicle Insurance;

    5) Fundamentally Reform the Hire Purchase Act;

    6) Make Imports of Goods and Services “Zero-priced” at ALL points of entry;

    7) Make Exports of Goods and Services to be paid for in local currency/”prices”;

    8) Make ALL Institutional Loans for Productive purposes NON-REPAYABLE;

    9) Ensure that a People’s Money Value system is established in Barbados, and which shall make sure that money/value is made available – at the least costs – to ALL those persons in Barbados who are productive and who shall qualify for such money/value;

    10) The the Productive SECTORS OF THIS COUNTRY ARE

  24. Krzysztof Skubiszewski Avatar
    Krzysztof Skubiszewski

    Dear Mr. Prime Minister et al,

    In case you skipped over this in Mr. Gilkes’ letter to the Nation.

    Is this the way a “democratically” elected Government allows “democracy” to function?

    “It is my understanding that a meeting held by these developers professed to have invited residents of Six Men’s to discuss this marina project. However, not one invitation was sent out to residents and certainly no person from the area attended. This was clearly a public relations ploy to convince the authorities that the interests of these residents were being considered.”


  25. I am so happy that The Scout and his clan are becoming more forward thinking and are now prepared to accept that the new Gov’t is good for this island the old tired and worn out people of the blp are in retirement, which is a grand thing for progressive DLP thinking.

    The new thinking saw the VERY SMOOTH shift to getting the numerous numbers of school children to their schools on time and without the stress associated with planning of this type the new Gov’t saw to it that each and every child of school age was delivered to their school without having to pay a SINGLE CENT to do so.

    I must compliment everyone involved in this exercise and give the Prime Minister The Hon Mr David Thompson, the Minister of Education Mr Ronald Jones, the Minister of Transport Mr John Boyce FULL and complete marks for making this the success that it was without the hassle that many expected, it took super planning and arranging to have reached where we reached minus the hassle that many blp operatives had hoped and wished for, it was carried out in a most professional manner that you could ask for.

    May I also state, from reading the comments in the press not only are the parents happy to not to have to pay this burden of a bus fare but so to are the school children they too are estatic about their new found means of travel to their schools, my congrats to all that went out of their way to make this the great success that it has been may the lord bless them and give them strength to move on to the next task and deliver there as well.

    I also to want to pick out Mr Ronald Jones for special praise, he has been like a beacon on a dark night showing the way, he faced the events and came out of it standing tall as we saw this Minister was seen in the forefront of the events recently the ONLY MINISTER IN YEARS THAT WAS WILLING TO BE UP FRONT AND HANDS ON IN A SITUATION THAT WAS COMBATIVE AND WHAT DID HE DO ?

    HE PUT HIS HANDS TO THE TASK AND LIFTED DESK AND CHAIRS INTO THE CLASS ROOMS, if this is not the real signs of a great leader I do not know what is, he led from in front he did what was necessary to get those kids back into the class rooms and for this I totally admire his leadership qualtites and style, he is to be commended and praised for his willingness to take the bull by the horns and address the outstanding issues at the schools and resolved they were, you have my compliments and praise Minister Mr Ronald Jones keep the good work up and may you go from strength to strength with gods help and mercy.

    One other point of note is why has it been necessary for the taxpayers to fund Hallam Nicholls, Owing Arthur and Steven Hobson by buying a constant suppply of new busses and never having anything more than 200 on the road at any point in time but under this return to school program we saw as many as 250 buses delivered and serviceable and operational to the Transport Board, we reall ought to request an inquiry into the operation of the Transport Board as there seems to be steal intheir as well, because very quickly under this new Gov’t they have an additional 50 buses in the program, someting that was thought to be impossible until the DLP Gov’t took the reins of Gov’t and halted the corruption and dishonesty in Gov’t operations, three chairs to the DLP, Hip, Hip Hooray, Hip , Hip Hooray, Hip, Hip Hooray. For a job and a mission well done, not event the most vocal like Henderson Bovell has the mouth to whisper a word in disgust, because he knows the ire that the it will bring onto himself and his clan of crooks.

  26. NO MORE MARINAS EVER AGAIN Avatar
    NO MORE MARINAS EVER AGAIN

    The thoughtful letter to the Nation may be too late. The surveyors and gangsters who rape precious West Coast land are already out in force doing their nasty at the site of the Six Mens marina. If their activities are to be stopped it must be done soon.

    But of course who stopped the planning, design and construction of the disgraceful Sands building before it was too late?


  27. A future PDC Government shall, among other things, do the following:

    1) Abolish ALL Taxation in Barbados;

    2) Abolish ALL Interest Rates in Barbados;

    3) Abolish ALL Exchange Rates Parities with the Barbados Dollar;

    4) Abolish ALL Motor Vehicle Insurance in the country;

    5) Fundamentally Reform the Hire Purchase Act of Barbados;

    6) Make Imports of Goods and Services into Barbados “Zero-priced” at ALL points of entry;

    7) Make Exports of Goods and Services from Barbados paid for in local currency/”prices”;

    8) Make ALL Institutional Loans for Productive purposes NON-REPAYABLE in Barbados;

    9) Ensure that a People’s Money Value system is established in the country, and which itself shall make sure that sufficient money/value is always made available to help provide the greatest gains and at the least costs to ALL those persons in Barbados who are productive and who shall qualify for such money/value;

    10) Ensure that ALL Productive Sectors of this country reach their maximum potential;

    11) Implement a regime whereby All land spaces – whether “bought”, “sold”, or “leased” in Barbados – are done so at administrative/nominal costs – the Abolition of the “renting” of Lands in Barbados;

    12) Make sure that NO FOREIGNERS are able to “own” our lands – they shall, however, only be able to “lease” them;

    13) Institute a serious Regime of Rent Control for ALL residential, commercial, and other properties that will be up for rent in Barbados;

    14) The introduction of a modern, efficient railway system for Barbados – to run on the present ABC and Ronald Mapp Highways;

    15) The creation of a school system at the secondary level – to a greater extent – and at the tertiary level – to a lesser extent – that will see the establishment of academies specializing in particular areas of study, namely, science and technology, languages, business studies, technical and vocational studies, etc;

    16) The construction of a new and well equipped acute care hospital in the north of the country;

    17) The reconstitution of the Royal Barbados Police Force into a people-centered, responsible and accountable law enforcement agency – most likely to be renamed the National Investigations Bureau – and, et al, whose functions SHALL DEBAR members from prosecuting cases in the courts of Barbados – BASED ON THE SEPERATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE, RIGHT NOW IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THEREFORE ILLEGAL FOR THE RBPF TO BE CONTINUING TO DO THIS IN THE MAGISTRATE COURTS;

    18) The introduction of a court system that will see special judges themselves investigating – on the basis of reports/allegations brought forward immediately to them by complainants/plaintiffs involved in certain disputes – and thereafter that that will see these same judges determining whether ( SHALL NO LONGER THE TASK OF THE MAIN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN REGARD OF CRIMINAL MATTERS ) certain criminal and civil cases should be tried in such a court system or not “on the spot” on the basis of the evidence up to that point in time produced in this court system;

    19) Making sure that Constituents debate and pass the laws of this country on the basis of the establishment of Constituency Assemblies – these Assemblies shall really constitute the supreme legislative body of the people and governmentof Barbados – so, sovereign power to the people of Barbados;

    20) The Removal of the British Monarchy as Head of State of Barbados – and in its place the establishment of an elected executive President of the People’s Republic of Barbados – at first, such a person shall be elected by the members that will comprise an elected Cabinet of Barbados – then later on, such a person shall be the one with the majority of votes cast in his/her favour in an election held across the country to fill such a position;

    21) The Abolition of the first past the post electoral system in Barbados – to be replaced by a variant of the proportional representational system, wherever needed in some national elections ( Cabinet) and parochial elections; and,

    22) The election of ALL High Court and Court of Appeal Judges in Barbados.

    PDC

    (N.B. the above instalment did manage some how to be sent to BU, without our clicking submit. How it happened we dont know right here. Any how, could you please remove it, BU)


  28. @Chris

    We don’t expect all Barbadians to know the laws verbatim, what we expect is that the updated laws should be easily available to be referenced on demand. The disinterest of an ‘educated and highly literate Barbadian population’ should concern us all.


  29. @David…

    I agree entirely.

    The issue I have is that the SIs are *not* widely known, and are not easy to access. You need to (somehow) know that a particular SI applies to a particular Act. Then you need to go down to the Printery, and request a copy.

    These, of course, are not available online. And therefore anyone who’s not in Barbados *cannot* determine the actual Laws.

    We are entering an age where, as you put it an “educated and highly literate Barbadian population” is *critical* for our future competitiveness.


  30. It would be a shame to develop Six mens into another half empty marina with manicured characterless beaches patrolled by over zealous security men desperate to catch someone sitting on the Port St Charles beach beds.
    The beach is very popular with easy access and one of the few places where one can safely park with a family in that part of the island.


  31. In England there are thousands of public footpaths that have been there for centuries and many of which cross private land. However, a landowner can cut off the footpath across his land if he can prove that it has not been used for so many years. In order to keep the footpaths open, there are several groups of hikers/ramblers that ensure that each and every footpath is used at least once a year to prevent its closure. We need a “beach group” in Barbados to ensure that each and every beach in Barbados is used by the public at least twice a year to ensure that no landowner can make arrangements that virtually privatise his beach, such as that at Port St Charles.


  32. “The current TCPO site says the new PDP is not in effect but as to whether the site needs an update or this is really the case, I can only guess.”
    ———————————————————-
    John , the website is out of date as most Government webistes are. I was told from a very reliable source that the resolution to adopt the 2003 Amended plan was passed by the BLP administration in the last sitting of Parliament in December 2007. The Opposition Members of the DLP were not present.

    The current Prime Minister signed off on it early in 2008 and the notice was in the newspaper.

    @ Chris – it is a really large document and not practical to scan and reproduce. You can of course purchase a copy from Town Planning. I think the price is $200.00.

    A copy shoulkd be downloadable from the TCPO webiste, however all they have available is the front cover and the Table of Contents which is 10 pages.

    Copies should be in the Public Library but I am not sure that we have an operataional Public Library at the moment.


  33. With all that is said, I think Mr Frank Gilkes needs to start drawing up a petition with as many signatures as he can get and I hope it is a couple thousand and get it into the P.M’s office ASAP. Talk can’t solve the problem. Let’s show we are serious.

  34. The Rt. Rev. Carol Antarrah A. M. Gilkes Avatar
    The Rt. Rev. Carol Antarrah A. M. Gilkes

    Re. Frank’s letter concerning the proposed Marina for Sixmen’s Bay I want to support my brother’s position. We both grew up in the small fishing village of 6men’s and over the last 30 plus years have watched how nearby Heywoods beach was raped to provide for a hotel and then a marina. In the process one of the most popular beaches and picnic spots on the island was destroyed/denied to Bajans. What could have been a world heritage site where the original inhabitants of this island lived some 2,500 years ago was dredged for the rich and famous to park their yatchs. I am hoping that what is now being proposed for the further destruction of my beloved 6men’s can be stopped before we lose more of our west coast to UGLY DEVELOPMENT.


  35. There will be a meeting on Sunday 19th October @ Braddy’s Bar located on the coast road of Sixmens, 5:pm. I am inviting all persons who support me in protesting the building of this marina @ Sixmens Bay to attend this meeting where we are hoping to put strategies in place for protest action against any further raping of our beach here @ Sixmens which will also lead to the destruction of our fishing village. So come in your numbers, tell a friend, bring the whole family because this is a family matter and we need to show solidarity with our brothers and sisters.


  36. Story remains Nation’s most emailed this week – http://shar.es/m1T5b – #Barbados #environment Please Retweet 3 minutes ago from TweetDeck
    savemullinsbay
    Save Mullins Bay

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading