Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

FRIENDS of a deceased man were shocked to learn that a big dispute had arisen over his burial rites. Apparently the dispute took place between family members and the man’s long-time girlfriend over the type of burial each wanted for him.

Pudding & Souse understands that the matter even ended up before a judge and the body was handed over to the girlfriend who was able to produce proof indicating the man’s wishes. Friends are hurt that the matter reached that stage without the two parties being able to compromise.

They said this would not have been the type of behaviour the man would have expected from each side. They are hoping the funeral can proceed without any further dispute and that this dear man’s soul and mind could rest in peace.

Source: Nation


albert selby

The BU family would have realized after one year that we have a ‘beef’ with the media in Barbados. They are very critical of the blogs because they feel we disseminate information which is mainly unsubstantiated. Of course it matters little to them that the Nation newspaper which has the label as the leading daily in Barbados publishes a gossip column which they call Pudding & Souse and rivals the popularity of Lowdown Hoad’s column. If we go by the on the ground reports, it is one of their most popular columns. The timid Nation management hides behind this column which uses veil inferences to release news which they are scared shitless to plainly publish.

Take for example the quote above.

We are puzzled why the Nation newspaper would not mention the names of the actors involved in this bassa bassa. Is it because of who the players are i.e. middle-class Barbadians who are known to have connections? We are disappointed that a man who died so tragically and who spent many years of his life counsellings people would now have to witness from his death-bed the fight which is taking place over his material possessions and burial arrangements.

It is advisable that we should all prepare for death, even though many of us neglect to make wills or prepare scripts detailing what arrangements are preferred when we inevitable must pass to the great beyond. In the case of Dr. Albert Selby we would have assumed that a man of his background would have recognized the benefit of having his last requests properly executed to preempt the bassa bassa which has erupted at his passing. Let us all learn from this unfortunate incident which we believe is ongoing.

We extend our sympathy to grieving family and friends of the decease.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

62 responses to “Albert Selby, May You Rest In Peace”


  1. so sad!


  2. The key word to this situation is “compromise”.
    I wonder how far each side was prepared to do just that. The girlfriend may have had more recent knowledge of what Dr. Selby wanted in terms of his funeral and burial,whereas, the family of a big grown man of 53 may not have had that kind of communication with his family. It’s hard to say really, not knowing how long the Dr. Selby had been involved with his girlfriend.
    If there was an ex-wife involved then it can only come down to the money and not setting precedence by giving the girlfriend any power to make decisions which may impact on any future monetary settlements.


  3. If there is no legally binding instruction which was left by the decease then we would think that the wishes of the family should trump.


  4. Why on earth is somebody’s business being discussed? How is this an issue? You just chastised the Nation and now where is this going?


  5. What somebody’s business? All I see BU doing is to tell people to make a will and leave instructions to avoid confusion. It is something we can learn from. Gamgee relax!!!

  6. Think about It Avatar

    Seems the “good” man was living a lie.

    He was not a Doctor — either of medicine or a Phd. but had the whole of Barbados believing and calling him one.

    He was married but had a girl friend?

    Ever hear about what goes around comes around?


  7. Think about it my research indicates that you are partially correct. The late Selby was a Clinical Pyhcologist and appears to be divorced.


  8. This happen way too often with families when love ones pass away. We need to learn the importance of having and updating a will as our assets and finical situations change. These situations sometimes can take generations to come to a close fully when no will is left.


  9. My condolences to the family of this young doctor. But, what women should learn from this is that if a man loves you so bad, then make him marry you.
    I do recall that something similar happened to the bus driver of the Jose river tragedy and I hear that wifee run the live in out because she was wife. No doubt, Katrina now got a big battle on she hand and one that she might eventually lose.


  10. Eddie while your wish is ideal in the traditional form of life and relationships you must be aware that changing values has led to a trivializing of the institution of marriage. No longer do we feel as a society that common law relationships are bad and te laws have been changed to reflect such. Our comment is not meant to disagree with your position, in fact we agree but at the same time we are firmly aware of the realities of the times in which we are living.


  11. According to Barbados Family Law, live in partners are considered wives if the relationship was longer than 3 years. In law, they are treated as such. If Dr. Selby was divorced, his ex is no loger his WIFE and his partner has claims to his estate at law. If there are children, the estate will be split with half to the partner and the remainder to the children. If the children are under age, the judge may rule that the estate supports them until they reach matriculation and then and only then can the estate be settled.

    The late Dr. Caddle was not divorced but when he died his wife and girlfriend tied up his estate in the courts until it was practically depleted by lawyers fees. He had a bayhouse at Bathsheba which became dilapidated and eventually was demolished. Someone called “Smokey” a convicted drug dealer has a shack on the land.


  12. I wonder if there are anymore live in girl friends besides the one mention? I heard that he had a few.


  13. Discussing the details of a supposedly family feud surrounding Dr. Selby’s funeral service is none of our business. Leave it alone and lets discuss topics that can add value to our lives. This particular topic adds none. Just gossip and hearsay. Bye


  14. LOL Gossip and busybodiness….is this waht we want from the 4th Estate!


  15. Barbados has lost a valued clinical psychologist who worked tirelessly with children with learning and attention disorders. He has left a void that cannot be seen as being filled any time soon.

    Rest in peace.


  16. Bertie Selby’s death is a great loss to Barbados. Many are not aware of the work done in some cases free of charge in working with children with disabilities in Barbados.


  17. My condolences go out especially to Katrina on the lost of her loved one. May God grant her strength to deal with all the issues she is faced with.


  18. Tony Selby got the body of his brother returned to the Selby family they were not common law married as Selby was divorces late on 2004 she spent one year over-seas I smell another braddies daughters gold-digging ways one day after he died his so called beloved GF changed locks and put the family through hell the money should go to his neices and nephews and causes he cared for..

    Five years is the Law she files a law suit first


  19. TONY SELBY WON AN ORDER AGAINST BRADDIES DAUGHTER AND CAN YOU IMAGINE HAD TO GO TO COURT TO HAVE THIS DONE>>>SICK SICK SHE IS not his wife partner and now she shows what she wants DISGRACE she did such good work for the child care board must she be like her nasty sister?


  20. FIVE YEARS to be a common law wife all she will get is that she disgraced the man she claimed to love memory so sad.

    I feel she would have got compensated but after a couple of years no child is she entitled to his estate give it to the kids he loved and treated stop behaving like a damn gold digger and respect him,

    he as barely cold before she had the Selby siblings on court they were close the brothers and his sister…Gosg fet a Job babe Katrina


  21. All this shows the importance of making a will. The deceased knew he had a heart condition, he had no children. Perhaps Albert did not want his siblings, nieces and nephews to get his property. The architect’s children certainly will lack for nothing. Just like Ron Hope who died suddenly – no children. He had some siblings who did not speak to him for years and whom he did not get along with. All of a sudden, he gone and siblings can’t wait to get their hands on his property. MAKE A WILL, FOLKS. CHILDREN OR NO CHILDREN. I gine start on mine.


  22. I saw Albert Sleby with Tony Seby a few days before his death eating out!
    You are losing what this is really about, it is irrelevant if Tony Selby is wealthy or not . Even if he had Bill Gates wealth, The issue is she has no claims!!!!

    Katrina Snith was only a girlfriend of a few years the law states to be comon law spouse five years.

    She did so much great work on issues of incest and for the child-care board and she started the battle and not even after he was barely dead was she already hiring her sisters law firm.

    I feel she should get a little something , but the love between siblings are those that are those of blood ties and the old cliche blood is thicker than that of water,

    It should got his siblings children and alarge portion to the Autistic and sexual incest issues of chidren he worked on.

    Why did Katrina choose such a path when clearly she was not his wife why not wait until after the funeral then get into the discussions , Tony Selby won the rights to have his body be given back to the Selby family he won the first battle and she should see this and money brings out the root of evil in people…Katrina did such good things for the UN and children this bis showing she has an ugly side so sad,,

    I am sure that if she had not been so direspectful during the first wek of his death Tony Selby w2ould have been compromising and helped her


  23. Zachary clearly he didn’t make a will leaving everything to Katrina either so it is safe to say according to your way of thinking lets make the assumption that if he didn’t make a wil leaving provisions for his sibling he didn’t make any provisions for his girlfriend either. so it is safe to say if that is the case he wanted no one to have anything rubbish she should get a very small part, the vast to his siblings who would probably invest and donate much of it to children of need!

    Pat Barbados Laws say five years not three, do your researc. SHE has no claims under Barbados laws

  24. Time for the Truth Avatar
    Time for the Truth

    Albert Selby had a lot of you all well fooled.

    There are two sides to every story and then the truth.

    There are many who know the truth about his so-called committment to children with learning disabilities. Parents of children who were exploited.


  25. I think he did care about others but many people do ave hidden agendas and if his has a Gf like this who hides behind the Child care board, UN and then goes after money like a tiger showing her claws and teeth it’s sickneing.

    You know the singer Shakira donated 35 Us million to charities and never goes around seeking attention yet Brad and Angelina donatd 8 million and wnat photo ops everytime they do it go figure..

    It is so sad…….but I think mr.Selby was a kind person but then he chose a gold digger for a GF and she is supposed to be the righteous person and now we see she fooled the incest victims and the UN and she wil probably not fair so well with the judge


  26. Oh dear how undignified.

    This is the dignified response:

    If you are not the legal or common law spouse the correct thing to do after a death, is take the items which you paid for and your receipts (you will need them) and leave the place. Do NOT, I repeat do NOT go to the funeral. Go to a friend or relatives house that day and lean on them for comfort. If you believe that you may have some claim to the deceased estate please consult a good attorney immediately AFTER the funeral.

    If there is both a legal, but estranged spouse and a common law spouse of more than 5 years, then there will be cat piss and pepper and everybody should run for their own lawyer right away as it will be impossible to have a dignified response.


  27. I feel that the Gf acted very undingnified , she was only with him a few years and apparently they never discusses marriage he had been through two previous the year prior to his death she was overseas and he according to Bajan rumors had other women he was a free agent.

    She could have went to the funeral. But afrter she disgraced the family and the por brother had to get an emergency court order to have his brother body returned to the Selby family and won that as the courts obviously didn’t deem her with wife rights or claims, so there must have been some stress at that funeral and the siblings had to be nice to a woman who one day after his death had a lawyer , went to the orgue called herself Katrina Selby, but if you notice the ation news was careful and caled her by her legal name Katrina Smith and addressed her as partner not wife for fear they even knew they couldn’t she had no legal claims , it’s sad, is she showing what she really thinks of her beloved partner that his money was what she wanted all along. The siblings were his sibling since small children and through his divorces, these are things that never change relationship with siblings even if they are not perfect , they grew up as children and the siblings all lost the parents at yong ages . At least one to heart disease she showed a lack of decency and dignity and what-ever love which may have been genuine she had for Mr.Sleby is tarnished by her greed many will deem her as a money monger, and not someone who truly loved him, How sad and maybe she did have deep love.

    But love is not calued by monetary measures.

    I feel she should have tried to be more civil and it was a bit tacky to not wait until after the funeral to do what she did.


  28. sorry for the typos,

    But in reality Dr.Selby was a kind person and I feel he deserved better . Because I think that sadly money can bring out the worst in some people with agendas and the love of it is surely the root of all evil.

    May he rest in peace.

    Hopefully te GF will just take what was hers and leave the Selby family alone and wlak away with respect and honor holding her head high and asaying it was love we shatred and though we were not married or was I was his wife nor did I have legal claims we shared happiness and love, and memories can’t be bought or replaced by money.

  29. politically incorrect Avatar
    politically incorrect

    It’s called “what goes around, comes around” or “sowing and reaping” in the Good Book.

    If he was so good and so kind would this be the outcome?


  30. Let sleeping dogs lie. All the money around cannot bring “the good” doctor back.


  31. It is sad that people do not respect loved ones in light of their deaths or their families, everyone comes out of the woodworks making claims is there anymore surprise girlfriends, will ex wives make claims,
    The only ones who will get rich will be the lawyers sadly.
    I feel sad when any death results in friends, partners and family fighting.
    Maybe both sides should put down thier swords and give the money from his estate to children of need in barbados just food for thought!

    I just have to say on thing Wills and updated look at Heath Ledger, he married a beautiful actress Michelle Williams had a child and forgot oops to update the will.

    When Heaths uncles say they had to fight * Heaths* dad when grandfather Ledger died.

    This seems so sad and very disturbing in which the way a human being with such great qualities and caring doctor is handled.

    I personally , feel what the GF is doing is very wrong because of the the rush, the time, they had no children, and didn’t make it to the common law legality.

    There should be time to grieve for all and if one feels they are entilted to some compensation then after the funeral issues should be addressed,


  32. Pudding & Souse got the facts wrong, the body was handed over to the brother and not her she is the who tried to have a funeral not the way the family wanted and the siblings won in an emergency court order as she has no real claims.

    This is So SO sad…..I hope they all donate his money to charities and call it a day….or to his siblings children….he did love his siblings children hence he had none with the two previous wives or the gf of a few yrs….

    just give it to his blood siblings and call it a day!!!


  33. Bajan Gurll it is you who go de facts wrong. The family did not want the cremation of de body to take place. He (Albert) told his gf that he want to get cremated. The family say no way. So they off to court defamily carry she. so you tell me who win. that is what Albert wanted and she made sure she got it. He got cremated shortly after de service
    Through de high courts


  34. There is good and bad in each person and reputation percieves one after he or she has died. One would think due to Dr. Selby’s reputationof reachingout and helping to so many children and adults in crisies. One might think that his reputation would be priority to those personally involved to protect.

  35. One world order Avatar
    One world order

    Well it appears that ( Katrina) wasn’t involved for five years she was in court trying to say that she was having a secret wedding planned for June LAUGH
    also….that she put cash into his business with no receipts !

    Goold Diggers learn from her doesn’t pay to be a dumb one and anyway all Gold Diggers should be like her and come out with Zilch zero!!!!!


  36. It is with great shock and sadness that we read of Bert’s tragic passing.
    Rest in Peace.
    Bruce and Yvonne

  37. Hans Anthonie Boersma Avatar
    Hans Anthonie Boersma

    For the family who misses Bertie:

    A Prayer of Sympathy.
    (Sent from Berties father to me in 1992)

    May it help to know
    That others care….
    That others share you sorrow
    And pray your comfort
    Will increase
    With every new tomorrow…

    Rest in peace Albert

    Hans Anthonie Boersma and Nelly
    Rhede (Ems)
    Germany


  38. I was saddened to learn of the death of Dr. Selby. I had been planning to return to Barbados for a follow-up visit. My son has ADHD and he had diagnosed him and offered advice on how to proceed with his condition. It was very useful and made a remarkable difference in the way I related to my son. I kept putting off the visit. I had discussions with a colleague today and he told me of his death earlier this year. May you rest in peace.


  39. Mr Blogmaster as a followup to your ’08 posted article the recent news article in the Nation (http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/94221/lover-loses-court) makes for interesting legal reading for all Bajans.

    I have not seen Dean Cumberbatch today but it would be instructive to get his views on the Appeal court’s verdict and a preview of any possible CCJ action.

    The original ruling that allowed a non-spouse, not even a common-law partner to gain access to the estate of a deceased was shocking, as a lay onlooker.

    How on earth could it be affirmed “that a man who was separated from his wife, but not divorced, could be regarded as single” and legally able to discharge his estate to a partner at the time of death?

    That was a stretch which as I understood was based on a British ruling but seemingly had much less precedent than the judge at first instance thought.

    This is an interesting case.


  40. @Dee Word

    BU was able to secure a response from the Dean.

    I am not familiar with the facts of this matter, but I suspect it is about the definition of a "union other than marriage". Justice Alleyne would have been of the view that a married man or woman could be party to such a union since the Family Law Act, as far as I am aware, does not expressly state anywhere that the parties have to be single. The Court of Appeal,on the other hand, considered that this would make a mockery of the stability of both unions and thus held that both of the parties to the "union other than marriage" have to be single.

    In the judgment of Alleyne J., a man could be married and at the same time involved in a "union other than marriage". Even though this seems to be the natural interpretation of the statute, the Court of Appeal considered it socially repugnant.

    [relevant part of the act]

    "union other than marriage" or "union" means the relationship that is established when a man and a woman who, not being married to each other, have cohabited continuously for a period of 5 years or more…"


  41. @David March 6, 2017 at 5:39 AM “In the judgment of Alleyne J., a man could be married and at the same time involved in a “union other than marriage”. Even though this seems to be the natural interpretation of the statute, the Court of Appeal considered it socially repugnant.”

    As the young people would write SMH.

    Socially repugnant what.

    Maybe we should not consult a law professr.

    Maybe we should consult a sociology professor.

    I bet that a good number of us, our parents and grandparents have been in such “socially repugnant unions.”

    Such unions are commonplace in Barbados and the Caribbean.


  42. An uncle of mine lived happily in such a “socially repugnant” union for more that 60 years.

    He had exchanged words and signatures with a woman in the 1930’s. One child was born. That union broke down. But there was never a formal divorce.

    Since it is not good that man should be alone, he went on to form a “socially repugnant” union with another woman with whom he lived peaceable for more than 60 years, and with whom he raised 10 children.

    So tell me who was his wife?

    And why?

    I put it to the learned legal minds that marriage is more than a piece of paper, that it is more that words exchanged before a pastor, priest or even before God.

    I put it to you that sociologically speaking that marriage is “what is’. That it is the day to day living and doing for each other, and I ask what gives the state the right to say that the first union is a marriage and that the second union is not a marriage.


  43. @King James Bible “And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother’s death.”

    And since we like to claim that our marriage laws and customs, and church practices are based on the Bible, please note that in the passage above there is no mention of pastor, priest, registrar or judge, just a young man bringing home his woman to his mother’s tent and loving her and having sexual relations with her.

    At what point did the church and state usurp marriage and began insisting that the only valid [ “real-real”] marriages are those blessed by the church, or signed-off on by the state?


  44. @ Simple Simon
    What the hell!!!
    Is this the day that Bushie has to eat nuff crow…???
    Well said.
    Excellent analysis of the situation.
    It is SO MUCH more fun to whack you….

    EVERYTHING in our society is designed around material things.
    Marriage is no different, so when we inherit albino-centric laws that govern marriage, you can be sure that the objectives are not focused around love, family or practicality, but around the disposal of assets.

    Inherently spiritual people who thrive on such virtues as loving relationships, sharing, respect for traditions and actually ENJOYING LIVING, tend to come into conflict with the albino-type rules and regulations….
    They therefore come up with such ‘outrageous’ things as multiple wives, easy divorces, and taking in a brother’s widow.

    In societies such as ours, where such natural instincts are constrained by albino-centric, materialistic laws, it is only natural to expect that the most rebellious will become outlaws – and end up in conflict with the white people’s laws…..

    The true slaves among us however, are those who quietly suffer their marriage lives in abject misery …with wives such as AC, (and husbands like Alvin), in order to conform…. and because of the materialistic consequences.
    Those lucky few ((like the David(BU) clan)), that were lucky enough to find a soul-mate at the first testosterone- driven lottery, should be on their knees every damn morning ….. thanking God for their good luck (rather than begging for more …..)


  45. I do not know that the requirement “…have cohabited continuously for a period of 5 years or more…” was EVER met between the mistress and non-divorced spouse so frankly that may also have been a determining factor as well.

    @David, thank you. And to you too @Jeff. I am also not familiar with the full ruling of Judge Olson or the Appeal court but it seems to me that it might have been more than moral repugnance that drove the latter verdict.

    And the rant from SS and BushTea are key reasons why I found the case interesting and full of impact to Bajans and was thus surprised that there was scant social interest on the blog. There are a number of factoids by the two bloggers that can be unpacked for solid discourse.

    I would add only:

    @SS…there can be little dispute that your uncle and many other Bajan men lived as you described but the fact is that the rule of law was established to create order to what was often chaotic lines of succession at time of death.

    It is not about any sense of moral certainty by a panel of male judges lacking social awareness rather it’s about basic rights and wrongs and, if I may describe it such, of natural justice.

    Living together as one for 60 years is one thing but when the ‘trophy mistress’ steps in and usurps the role of wife on-and-off for a few years – and not within the demands of any precedent for time together – it can be considered a tad unrighteous when she makes a grab for the deceased’s estate.

    I am not offering an opinion in the case under review but speaking generally as this happens more often in life than we may want to accept.

    The law is there to protect the ‘original’ family and as best as possible all concerned.

    I have no idea why it’s a screed about albino-centrism, whatever that really means.

    Again, thanks Mr Blogmaster and Jeff for the response.


  46. @Dee Word

    The traditional family continues to be threatened on all fronts. What type of values do we want to accept as molding the concept/identity of family?


  47. Marriage is a profit centre for Lawyers.

    Done it twice. My focus (during separation and divorce ) was ” the reasonable division of assets and minimizing legal fees.


  48. @ David ” The traditional family continues to be threatened on all fronts”…..

    as it has been for the last 100 years.


  49. @Simple Simon March 7, 2017 at 1:16 AM “ONE: So tell me who was his wife? TWO: And why?”

    These are two simple but provocative questions to which I would really like to have answers.


  50. I think that both the church (and by the church I mean organized religions such as Judism, Christianity, Islam etc.) and the state have failed to recognize that marriage and family life have existed for hundreds of thousands of years before the birth of Judism, Christianity, Islam etc., and long before the birth of nation states.

    The people who were brought to Barbados against their will [I am not a Ben Carson so I will not pretend that our foreparents came here because they believed that Barbados or America were/are some kinds of promised lands] that is the majority of our foreparents came with marriage customs that predated Judism, Christianity, Islam etc. so who gave the English slave masters the right to deligitimize our marriage customs?

    We will remember that for most of the last 400 years of Barbados’ history, the English slave masters and those who followed their customs told us that most of our children were bastards, were illegitimate, that our were the children of “no man”, even though our mothers were absolutely clear about our father’s identity. We knew our fathers who loved and supported us, even while English law told our fathers that the children were not theirs and that they did not have to support them, or to leave them a part of their estate, that a man’s own children were the children of “no man”

    In an attempt to fix this LEGAL LIE Barbados’ family law was revised to recognize de facto husband/wife relationships, and to recognize de facto parent/child relationships. I believe that the law is ripe for another revision.

    Because ask yourself what makes a legal marriage of 1 day’s duration a marriage with all the rights of inheritance etc, and a defacto marriage of 1825 days duration, not a marriage (that is 5 years, plus one leap day, and minus one day)

    Another court in giving deeper and broader thought to the nature of marriage may well come to another decision.

    My church has always taught that a couple are the parties to the marriage, that essentially the couple marries themselves, but that if they are believers they come to the church for a blessing, and that they go to the state to register “the fact” that the marriage exists.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading