โ† Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

George Brathwaite (Ph.D)

Last Wednesday night, a discerning audience got to hear from one of the sober minds emanating from within the bosom of the Barbados Labour Party (BLP). Ryan Straughn delivered an insightful, comprehensive, and forward-looking presentation that hailed the intellect, vision, and leadership of arguably Barbadosโ€™ best prime minister โ€“ JMGM โ€˜Tomโ€™ Adams. Straughnโ€™s presentation was timely, and it reached across the exacerbated political divide which is already hampering real progress in the island. Straughn delved into the glory days of governance in Barbados, to indicate that there are realistic pathways for returning economic growth to the island.

The Christ Church East Central BLP candidate, whose economic background, perhaps does not say sufficient about him as a rational intellect and progressive thinker, certainly got the message across that it cannot be business as usual in Barbados. Verbally, graphically, and at times with a wit demonstrating his connectedness to Barbadian culture, the maturing Ryan Straughn painted a picture of the sad state that Barbados finds itself due to bad measures and unsustainable practices undertaken by the Democratic Labour Party (DLP). Indeed, Straughn used the vision and sagacity of Tom Adams to reveal the ineffective policies and damaging practices courted by Prime Minister Stuart and his inept Minister of Finance, Christopher Sinckler.

In the audience, there was rivetted interest set against the canvas that was erected by Straughnโ€™s insight. His brush was appropriately textured and wetted with the colour and substance for anyone willing to rescue the floundering Barbados economy. Whether one prefers to hide from the facts that Barbados has seriously struggled under the DLP since 2008, or if one chooses to reflect on the fact that Straughnโ€™s frankness also put possible solutions to the problems, were significant. The shallowness of the DLPโ€™s posturing became a takeaway because the erstwhile economist exposed the DLPโ€™s lack of creativity and competence when it comes to the management and growth of the Barbados economy.

Certainly, a decade ago Barbadians had more money in their pockets. The promise of prosperity for all Barbadians was ever-present; and numerous jobs were created while foreign investments and revenues from international business grew bountifully. Additionally, debt was kept under control. Not today! Barbadians cannot leave the terminal because the driver is asleep, and the co-pilot does not know how to navigate the peopleโ€™s business.

Regrettably, the Stuart-led DLP has virtually smashed most things that would be important for rebuilding the economy and returning significant growth to the Barbados economy. The constant and systematic downgrades have come with such regularity that the recent CCC rating – with a negative outlook – may bypass the scrutiny of Barbadians suffering from their other setbacks. The very socio-economic stepping stones that would normally be used to trigger hope and encourage positive responses such as in tertiary education, have been dislodged by a myopic and sell-out DLP Cabinet.

Painfully though funny, the current Finance Minister still has difficulty understanding basic economic formulae of supply, demand, and price. Minister Sinckler does not understand the basis of taxation policy in a small developing economy, and displays an incomprehension of savings, investment, and spending. How can Barbados attract investors, or gain credit worthiness in the international system when at home, Barbadians do not have confidence in the Finance Minister to do a reasonable job?

Moreover, how does a prime minister fail to talk with the public and refuse to shuffle his Cabinet when all tried outcomes have been disastrous for Barbadians? Surely, the DLP has run its course and its bus is going nowhere forward, and backward is not the populationโ€™s destination. Barbados is ready to make a definitive statement on the DLPโ€™s failures and broken promises.

On the matter of busses and transportation, it was shocking that the General Secretary of the beleaguered DLP would resort to another unimpressive piece of spin. Distorting Ryan Straughnโ€™s well-received Tom Adams Memorial Lecture, Pilgrim went down the road with a superficial statement. George Pilgrim stated that Straughn โ€œsought to linkโ€ the number of cars on the road to a โ€œreduced need for access to public transportation.โ€ Pilgrim wanted to impart maximum political damage by desperately wishing that Barbadians would forget the chaotic mess happening under the DLP since 2013, and refocus on the emotive advertisement with the โ€˜old ladyโ€™ on the bus.

Pilgrim contended that โ€œthe logicโ€ of Straughnโ€™s reference to the need to transform the poor service which Barbadians currently receive from the Transport Board was an affront to the nation. Unashamedly, and appearing more distressed than usual, Pilgrim mockingly lamented Straughnโ€™s capacity to deliver a comprehensive package to enhance services for Barbadians. Arguably, Pilgrim may have been the only person in Barbados interpreting Straughn to mean that since โ€œmore Barbadians now own cars, it is legitimate to privatize public transportation and put hundreds of hard working public sector workers on the breadline.โ€ This is the debased thinking that characterises todayโ€™s DLP.

Indeed, over a year ago, it was reported that Ryan Straughn agreed with Finance Minister Sinckler that while โ€œnot rushing ahead to just go picking this and picking that and privatize this and privatize that โ€ฆ we are going to [take] a judicious approach.โ€ Is the DLPโ€™s misleading statement suggesting that its spokespersons are willing to avoid a relevant conversation with the public on the worsening ills of public transport? Why did Pilgrim not see it fit to say how the DLP administration will address matters of efficiency? Straughn offered an alternative to fix efficiency issues; and he reinforced the need for the appropriate regulatory framework.

It is known by the employers and employees that the Transport Board has become a broken system. Under the DLP, public transport creates perilous job insecurity for thousands of Barbadians having to commute daily. Getting to work for the little pay is a horror! Perhaps, employers are more empathetic than the Prime Minister and the substantive Minister. Hundreds more could have lost their jobs due to repeated lateness and absence, given the poor bus service. Every day, numerous persons are stranded in the terminals or at stops along the potholed-road network. Never is there certainty of a bus although hours of waiting. Can the Stuart-led Cabinet and surrogates speaking on behalf of the DLP be so willing to whip the tails of Bajans into submission?

Ryan Straughn knows that privatisation, restructuring, or any permutation of operational adjustment ought to reflect practicality and the national interest. On public transportation service, it is deep failure and crisis that make the Transport Board โ€œan area that is obviously ripe for some revisiting.โ€ However, Straughn has cautioned that Barbados โ€œcanโ€™t afford to lag much longer.โ€ The Ministerโ€™s constant promises remain fruitless. Barbadians know that crocodile tears will not work going into the next elections. Workers and students cannot continue to rely on a worsening transport system. Who is being fooled when the DLPโ€™s bus has conked-out before the passengers managed to get on board?

Ryan Straughn is not about top-down politics and beefed up econometrics. Rather, Straughn is about participatory democracy. Barbadians must have a say regarding those issues affecting them at personal and community levels. Straughn has consistently asserted that a review of how the stateโ€™s resources are spent must be part of the solution. Furthermore, he has indicated that attempts to correct matters of inefficiency must unfold from โ€œa national consultation before any action is taken.โ€ Ryan Straughn, thank you for a clear and futuristic articulation of the undisputed facts. The thoughtlessness and laziness of the Cabinet shows that the DLPโ€™s bus is conked-out. The DLPโ€™s obsession with propaganda blocks pathways to progress.

(Dr George C. Brathwaite is a political consultant. Email: brathwaitegc@gmail.com)


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

101 responses to “The George Brathwaite Column – DLP’s Bus Conked-out”

  1. Well Well @ Consequences Observing Blogger Avatar
    Well Well @ Consequences Observing Blogger

    lol…


  2. While owners of PSVs have to maintain fleets of Hino Road Runner mini-buses, some of which are over 20 years old, the Transport Board, with subsidies from government, is struggling on a daily basis to keep 80 units in operation.

    And TB management continues to out-source majority of bus repairs to establishments other than UCAL. Some days UCAL does not get one bus to service.

    When last were the TBโ€™s audited financial statements published for public perusal?

    What about a report on how many defective buses the โ€œ$22,000 a month man,โ€ Trinidadian consultant David Bartholomew, was able to โ€œreintroduceโ€ into operation?

    Lashley and TBโ€™s management could find $22,000 a month to pay a consultantโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ but refuses to pay UCAL.

    While addressing the DLPโ€™s FACTS conference, which was held at St. Giles Primary School, Ivy, St Michael, on Sunday, July 23, 2017, Michael Lashley defended the hiring of the consultant and referred to โ€œa document submitted by Price Waterhouse Coopers found that initiatives of the consultant had saved the Transport Board millions of dollars.โ€

    Bearing in mind that TB does not belong to a BLP or DLP administrationโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ but to all tax payers, when will Lashley and his inept DLP administration present this โ€œdocumentโ€ for public perusal?

    This inept Stuart led DLP administration seems to be of the opinion that matters of national importance should be discussed only in DLP forums, where ministers remain unchallenged to โ€œpolitically spinโ€ the issues to appease gullible party supporters.

  3. Well Well @ Consequences Observing Blogger Avatar
    Well Well @ Consequences Observing Blogger

    …..And TB management continues to out-source majority of bus repairs to establishments other than UCAL. Some days UCAL does not get one bus to service……

    someone said on any given day ya can find 5, 6 or more TB buses parked up at Simpson`s motors, what is that all about and how much is that contract costing taxpayers…the despicable governments acts like they are not answerable to the majority population.


  4. It is interesting to observe the BLP crawling back from the position Straughn shared in his Tom Adams Memorial Address as it relates to transport. One one have thought Straughn and the BLP as a party would have synced the message given the importance of


  5. Ryan Straughn delivered an insightful, comprehensive, and forward-looking presentation that hailed the intellect, vision, and leadership of arguably Barbadosโ€™ best prime minister โ€“ JMGM โ€˜Tomโ€™ Adams.

    Really? Was Tom Adams a better premier/prime minister than his father? On what basis is this assessment made? Where is the evidence?
    I have long said that Grantley Adams is the BLP’s dirty little secret. They seem to be embarrassed by a man who was head and shoulder a better political leader than Barrow and arguably the great post-war Caribbean leader. The Swaine case aside, Adams was a giant among Lilliputians. Tom is not worthy to be mentioned in the same breath.


  6. Similarly to how Bostic implied that Straughn was not speaking for the BLP, Iโ€™m not sure we should not consider the comments of one BLP parliamentarian as the collective agreement of the BLP.

    However, one must take into consideration that the general election is a few months away, and the privatization issue, especially as it relates to the Transport Board, was something of an โ€œAchilles heelโ€ for the BLP during the 2013 election campaign.

    Perhaps Bostic is suggesting the BLP should not take any chances at this point in time.


  7. Bostic clearly stated that such a party position would have to be presented to the parliamentary group. It is up to Mottley or the BLP PRO to clarify. This is the problem in Barbados, mixed messages, taking the people for granted. Here is the question for the BLP-

    What is the BLP’s position on the transport board should they assume office.

    On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >

  8. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger. Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger.

    This is so destructive to a country, if not stamoed out you get what Barbados now has…a filthy, seemingly unsolvable mess. This is what both governments have gotten up to with minority business people for the last 3 or 4 decades and destroyed the island.

    how many insurance companies bid for the TB contract 17 years ago.

    http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/101363/government-moves-contractors-alleging-fraud-bid-rigging

    Today
    October 17
    29ยฐC
    11:01 AM


    Government moves against five contractors alleging fraud and bid rigging
    CMC,
    Added 17 October 2017

    Debt Restructuring – the Big Picture Read More Bahamas government to meet bankers over fee increases Read More Windies rout Zimbabwe โ€˜Aโ€™ Read More Hard start Read More Consider the rape victim Read More Who exactly are โ€˜gangstersโ€™? Read More Hot soca at the Cove Read More
    PORT OF SPAIN โ€“ The Trinidad and Tobago government Monday said it had filed lawsuits against five contractors who it said colluded to defraud the State of over TT$200 million through bid-rigging and contracts with inflated costs a few years ago.

    Minister in the Office of the Attorney General Stuart Young, told a news conference that the government would also be starting legal action soon against former housing minister, Dr Roodal Moonilal over allegations of bid rigging with respect to at least 10 contracts through the Estate Management and Business Development Company (EMBD) in 2015.

    Young told reporters that the Keith Rowley administration, through the EMBD, had filed claims in the High Court against the contractors โ€“ TN Ramnauth and Company Limited, Mootilal Ramhit and Sons Contracting Limited, Kallco Company Limited (Kallco), Namalco Construction Services Limited (Namalco) and Fides Limited (Fides) for alleged โ€œcartelโ€ arrangements and attempts to defraud.”

  9. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger. Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger.

    “Cartel arrangements and attempts to defraud.”

    ….successful no doubt…

  10. Frustrated Businessman: Animal Farm sequel playing out in Bim. Avatar
    Frustrated Businessman: Animal Farm sequel playing out in Bim.

    Gov’t’s job is to LEGISLATE, REGULATE AND FACILITATE, NOT OPERATE.

    Turn tax-spenders into tax-payers.

    Give the rest of us tax-mules a break from the financial burden of the socialist, incestuous, corrupt, vote-buying system we’ve created.

    This country can be viable again, but not unless we shed the free-loaders.


  11. David wrote ” What is the BLPโ€™s position on the transport board should they assume office.?”

    My questions include What is the BLPโ€™s position on the sewerage and garbage problems ?

    What is the BLPโ€™s position on potholes and road repair and maintenance.

    What is the BLPโ€™s position on FOOD SECURITY?

    What is the BLPโ€™s position on the Hyatt project ?

    What is the BLPโ€™s position on integrity legislation and will you enact it within 90 days in office.?

    The campaign has started. Time to tell Bajans what you will do when you win.


  12. @ Hal

    We have a strange way of declaring people as “brilliant” . In many cases its more an accusation than a fact.

  13. Bernard Codrington. Avatar
    Bernard Codrington.

    @ David at 10 :43 AM

    Mr. Straughn was giving The Tom Adams Memorial lecture. Clearly his views must be personal and may not represent the views of the Barbados Labour Party. There is no conflict. Mr. Bostic’s position is politically correct.

    @Hal Austin at: 10 :27 AM

    I do agree that persons of Dr. Brathwaite’s generation have a tendency to underrate Sir Grantley’s intellect, political shrewdness, and effectiveness in bringing democracy to the Barbados landscape. But the first gear always have the hardest work in removing inertia and the fourth gear gets all the praise for winning and speed. … engineeringly speaking.


  14. @Bernard

    Yours is a logical response. It would be helpful if George can advise the criteria used presenters of the Tom Adams Memorial address are selected. A check of the list of past presenters suggests they were all pro-BLP.


  15. @ Hal

    A clear misunderstanding on your part. This was a Tom Adams Memorial lecture. Sir Grantley is the founding father of a modern Barbados. He is considered the father of democracy in Barbados. Such points were not missed by Straughn in the lecture.

    @ David
    Berrnard is right. However, I have no objection to a discussion and Straughn and other members of the BLP have consistently stated that any privatisation of any state assets must have the active participation and views of the public otherwisse nothing doing. However, it was commendable that the gentleman sought to possible ways of correcting the serious waste of money and mis-management of resaources regarding the TB. He spoke about regulations and about incorporating technology into any prospectful changes. If you listen, you will note that he clearly states it is up to the people.


  16. re William Skinner October 17, 2017 at 11:38 AM #
    @ Hal

    We have a strange way of declaring people as โ€œbrilliantโ€ . In many cases its more an accusation than a fact.

    nice stroke through the covers Sir


  17. Thanks George-

    It does seem irregular(?) that a declared candidate of a political party who must have been involved in the input to the Covenant of Hope document would promote a view that is not sanctioned by the party on the eve of a general election. That said, it is good to have a party member daring to share a personal view. We need more of it!

  18. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger. Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger.

    Peter Wickham should be chased off the island the day after the election, what the hell is a political scientist.

    “Four safe Dees
    . . . but PM not so certain to retain his seat, Wickham says

    Added by Emmanuel Joseph on October 16, 2017.
    Saved under Local News, Politics
    1Save
    The Democratic Labour Party (DLP) is all but certain to retain four seats in the next general election, but St Michael South represented by Prime Minister Freundel Stuart is not among them, according to pollster and political scientist Peter Wickham.

    Wickhamโ€™s prediction is consistent with the findings of the recently-concluded series of Pulse of the People random surveys in all 30 constituencies conducted by Barbados TODAY in the lead up to the election due by the middle of next year.

    In keeping with the survey findings, Wickham argued that Stuart should not be ruled out because, as Prime Minister, his seat ought to be safe.

    However, he is under โ€œserious pressureโ€ from newcomer Kirk Humphrey of the Opposition Barbados Labour Party (BLP), who is in with a chance to steal the constituency from the DLP leader.

    Meanwhile, Wickham endorsed the Pulse of the People finding that St Michael North West represented Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler, St Philip North held by Minister of Transport and Works Michael Lashley, St Philip West where the incumbent is Minister of Agriculture, Food, Fisheries and Water Resource Management Dr David Estwick and St John, represented by Mara Thompson, were safe DLP seats, saying they acted as firewalls for the incumbent.”


  19. We should always try to be โ€œfair and balanced.โ€

    Every Sunday during the past few weeks, I have been reading an Albert Brandford column in the Sunday Sun, entitled โ€œPromises, Promises, Promises,โ€ in which he highlights BLP policies.

    In last Sunday, October 15, 2017 edition of the Sunday Sun, the column is on page 22A and Brandford focused on a BLP initiative: โ€œPutting money in peopleโ€™s pockets.โ€

    Therefore, I believe it is misleading for some people to suggest the BLP has not presented any information relative to their social and economic policies.

    Perhaps we should do a bit more reading.


  20. @Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger. October 17, 2017 at 12:26 PM “Peter Wickham should be chased off the island the day after the election.”

    Now, now.

    Ya gine too far.

    Tek ya mout offa my Peter.


  21. @Hal Austin October 17, 2017 at 10:27 AM “Ryan Straughn…Barbadosโ€™ best prime minister โ€“ JMGM โ€˜Tomโ€™ Adams.”

    Perhaps

    Hyperbole?= that is exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.

    Or as the young people would say “bigging up” Tom because the lecture was being delivered in Tom’s name?

    I dunno,

  22. Bernard Codrington. Avatar
    Bernard Codrington.

    @ David at 12:04 PM

    One can be pro- BLP and pro- DLP and have personal and private opinions contrary to the official policies of the Party.

    It is good practice and good manners to indicate that the views expressed by individuals are not necessarily those of one’s employer or one’s party. That is to say: the official position may be different and the position that I will defend publicly.

    Investment advisers are duty bound to advise clients that past performance is no indicator of future performance. The risk is always that of the investor. And he must take responsibility for outcomes. Never assume that the past is or will be repeated.

    Logical and obvious ?


  23. George,

    Plse re=read the below quote:

    Ryan Straughn delivered an insightful, comprehensive, and forward-looking presentation that hailed the intellect, vision, and leadership of arguably Barbadosโ€™ best prime minister โ€“ JMGM โ€˜Tomโ€™ Adams.

    There is no misunderstanding, certainly not on my part. That it was a Tom Adams memorial lecture is no excuse. It has nothing to do with that, or a lecture about the man on the moon. It is given as a statement of historical fact. I am saying it is at best, disputable, at worst, just plain wrong. I am still looking for the evidence that sets Tom Adams apart from other premiers/prim ministers.

    @Bernard,
    The reason for learning our history is that we do not have to live in years past. Not only in this lecture, but generally Sir Grantley is almost marginalised in contemporary Barbadian social and political history, not just by the general public, but by senior BLP members. It is unforgivable.
    Just look at the nonsense talked about Barrow and free education, and the actual contribution made by Sir Grantley in extending education to ordinary working people.


  24. @Bernard your point is taken and agreed as earlier stated in theory. What some of us struggle with is that despite personal positions- as espoused by Struaghn last week- when these political aspirants ascend to the Lower House it is all about toeing the party line. And it does not matter if they are on the backbench. That independent thinking/thought goes through the window.


  25. @ Hal

    Come on. I stated “arguably”. When most Barbadians speak to the notion of best prime ministers, three names tend to come up more than any others. Errol Barrow, Tom Adams, and Owen Arthur. That is why one would use the term “arguably” . You know that I know that. Grantley Adams was Prime Minister of the West Indies Federation but never of Barbados. That too you know. Do not split hairs about such small things.


  26. George,
    That is why I said premier/prime ministers. I am still waiting for the criteria on which this assessment is based. To include Owen Arthur on a list of good politicians, far less prime ministers is a bad joke. The man who sold BNB? The man who was at the wheel when household debt went stratospheric? The man who, since his removal from office, has spent nearly all his time trying to, not only destroy his successor, but his former party.

  27. Bernard Codrington. Avatar
    Bernard Codrington.

    David at 12: 53 PM

    There is nothing wrong with that process. It makes democracy, as defined by us, workable. It is the Westminster model. If you have a horse-drawn carriage with two horses and one decides to go left and the other decides to go right, will there be progress?
    If half of Barbados drivers decide to drive on the left and the other half decide to drive on the right there will be no progress and utter chaos. Those are the rules of the game. And they work.
    There is no conflict. Do not confuse our political system with others.


  28. @Bernard

    We will never agree to your perspective as posted @2017/10/17 at 1:20 pm

    There is a place for a homogeneous, uniform approach. Then there is a place for entrepreneurial, innovative and creative approaches. This is especially required in a competitive space/market.

  29. Bernard Codrington. Avatar
    Bernard Codrington.

    @ David at 12:53 PM

    The independent thinkings of which you speak are to be ventilated at party parliamentary group meetings and a position decided on. That decision becomes the party’s position.

    What you perceive to be happening in recent times is a dangerous aberration from the norm.


  30. @Bernard 2017/10/17 at 1:43 pm

    To a point, however the role or lack of the influence of a backbench in our system of government is the issue at hand. A good backbench in numbers, possessing intelligence and political acumen serve as a good whip to the party to keep the frontbench on its toes therefore giving the leader options. This is where our parliamentary system is failing us and has set us back years. How can we force the tweaks we need to improve the system?

  31. William Skinner Avatar

    @ Hal
    We talk about : Barrow, Arthur, the Adamses,
    Etc. We need to talk about Wynter Crawford,
    Sir Frank Walcott, Charles Duncan O’Neal as
    well.
    The historians who got free university
    education have done us a great disservice
    by not writing books about such people.
    @ David
    You can wish upon as many stars as you
    like but the truth is that those aspiring to
    political office are barren philosophically and
    ideologically . Garbage in, garbage out!


  32. William,
    I remember Wynter Crawford and his platform speeches. But I am also interested in the lights that did not shine; and in those who allowed themselves to be co-opted in to the system.
    I would also single out people who made an incredible contribution as community activists, here I am thinking of Reynold Weekes, Leroy Harewood, Dan Blackett, Bowden pere, et al.
    I know it is not fashionable, but Ernest Deighton Mottley must also be remembered for his incredible work operating out of the Lower Green. It was his influence and power that forced the vindictive Errol Barrow to dissolve local government in Barbados. His Park Kitchen alone deserves his historical memory.
    @William, we owe these great men and women a duty to make sure they are not lost to history.

  33. Bernard Codrington. Avatar
    Bernard Codrington.

    @ William Skinner at 2 : 35 PM

    Prof. Sir Woodville Marshall has written a book on Mr. Wynter Crawford. You should purchase and read it. It requires tremendous research effort and money to write and publish books. The author is known for his high standard of research and scholarship. So it is value for money.

    That leaves Sir Frank Walcott and Charles Duncan O’Neal . Perhaps you should try your hand at writing a biography of one of these gentlemen.


  34. In the information age info is freely available if not in the traditional form.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08XObZ7WepM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aNB_g_5LRE


  35. David&Bernard

    Thats why we need a multi-party state and coalition governments……..It will complete the Westminster model…….every one will find their comfort zone.

    quoting Bernard……”It requires tremendous research effort and money to write and publish books. The author is known for his high standard of research and scholarship.”…..

    David do those offerings above on heroes pass Bernard’s test?


  36. @Vincent,
    Wrong. The Westminster model is the reason for the two-party system – first past the post. The system you are proposing is based on proportional representation. Look t Italy, Germany, Israel, etc to see how that works.


  37. Hal

    How many Partys presently at Westminster?


  38. @ Vincent Haynes

    Just for the purpose of elucidation, what is meant by the concept of two party system reflects the dominance of two parties in an adversarial setting. Put differently, it matters not how many parties are represented in the chamber or would have contested the elections because the system inherently focusses on the government and the opposition characterised by the parties with the most seats. Between 2010 and 2015 for instance, you saw a coalition government in the UK, that did not demerit the adversarial nature between the governing and the opposing side. Since then, we know that the Lib Dems have paid the price. All that says that Hal is very correct and so is Bernard.


  39. @David October 17, 2017 at 3:34 PM #

    Canยดt we revive Bussa to clean the political landscape? At least a man of action, not of hot air.

  40. Bernard Codrington. Avatar
    Bernard Codrington.

    Vincent Haynes at 4:17 PM

    No the offerings above are too poor rakey . They do not give William and me any insight into the”philosophical” and “ideological” underpinnings that guided their political contributions to Barbados society ,polity , and economy.

    Vincent, how I sound ? Do you think I can get a job as a research assistant to William? I will suggest that he recruits you and Simple Simon to deal with the sexy and salacious area of their lives. Wuh loss I hope you know that I joking?

  41. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger. Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger.

    Trial tomorrow.

    “TRIAL
    Ti m e No. Case No.
    11:00 a.m. 2 CV1218A/2017 Mia Amor Mottley v. The (Barbados) Today, et al”


  42. Bernard

    Hmmm……now which one is a joke?

    Are you saying then that you are satisfied with the offerings as is.

  43. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ George C. Brathwaite October 17, 2017 at 12:15 PM
    โ€œBerrnard is right. However, I have no objection to a discussion and Straughn and other members of the BLP have consistently stated that any privatisation of any state assets must have the active participation and views of the public otherwisse nothing doing.โ€

    By George! You have to be either living in cloud cuckoo land or trying to tell a big joke to impress us with your hidden talent of comedy for stoic relief.

    When and where was โ€˜Privatizationโ€™ ever open for public debate except when Owen Arthur made the shares in the BNB available to Bajan investors (as was heard since I speak from a hand-me-downโ€™ perspective)?

    Did Sir Lloyd engage in any public discussions on the pros or cons of privatization when most of the then economically viable family silver was sold for a mess of forex pottage under the then Hobsonโ€™s choice IMF programme?

    One of the preconditions in the โ€˜inevitablyโ€™ upcoming bailout IMF programme in order to gain access to life-saving forex will be NO future participation by the current Transport Board in the countryโ€™s public transport system (which is already, in its majority, a private sector undertaking) at either its operational or service delivery level.

    Any regulatory or โ€˜faresโ€™ review (prices setting) functions would be the core responsibilities of an upgraded and streamlined Transport Authority.

    Mr. Straughn, out of sheer professional but naรฏve decency, is only calling an oncoming economic spade by its true fiscal colour dressed in political black.

    Just a 1991 repeat of a dรฉjร  vu event of taking partisan politics out of fiscal realties to ensure whoever pays the financial piper in forex calls the privatization tune.

  44. Bernard Codrington. Avatar
    Bernard Codrington.

    @ Vincent,
    if I have to explain the joke , then it is no joke. I will take Hal’s advice and speak plainly.


  45. I want the BLP to tell me and the country what they are going to do. I want something to vote for not against.


  46. Kevin
    Something like for competence?

  47. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger. Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger.

    One DLP yardfowl has risen so far, probably believe everyone is forgetting everything that transpired in the last 6 weeks,.

  48. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger. Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger.

    Where are the new political parties anyway, saw a facebook post from Solutions Barbadosc last night about some meeting they are having, but one FB commenter made a comment and I quote from memory. .

    “I would not trust Scott Weatherhead to walk my dog, as long as he is involved, it is something crooked.”

    Ah can’t even say I was stunned…lol

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading