← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Press Release by Mrs. Juliette Bynoe Sutherland, Incoming Executive Director, Barbados Family Planning Association (BFPA)

BFPA
Click to view BFPA website

The Barbados Family Planning Association (BFPA) strongly supports initiatives to rationalize the age of sexual consent with the age of access to services without parental consent and lauds Faith Marshall-Harris, UNICEF Advocate for Children for bringing into sharp focus the legal gap that exists for sixteen and seventeen year olds in Barbados.

According to Director of the BFPA, Mrs. Juliette Bynoe–Sutherland, “the idea that young people across the country can be legally sexually active at 16 years old and not be able to prevent and access treatment for sexually transmitted infections or prevent unplanned pregnancies is deeply problematic and the BFPA for many years has been lobbying to close this gap”.   She stated that The BFPA believed that the role of parents must be respected and acknowledged that some parents were adequately addressing the issue of teen sexuality in the home and that it was understandable why some parents had concerns that any change in policy or legislation may prevent them from being aware of the health seeking behaviour of those under their charge or that a change in law may be seen by teens as encouraging sexual activity.

“Many parents are already adequately addressing these issues and are prepared to address their children’s needs should they learn or suspect that they are sexually active. However, many parents are not addressing issues of sexuality or are in denial that their children are sexually active, leaving many young persons to pursue sexual expression secretly and to become exposed to risky activity such as unprotected sex” Mrs. Bynoe-Sutherland lamented.

The BFPA executive further noted that evidence from local research indicated that that many young persons were already sexually active by age 16 and that many teens had sex involuntarily or through coercion by peers or older persons. “I therefore do not subscribe to the notion that sexually active young persons are a hopeless lot and should be consigned to rubbish heap to take whatever they get from sexual activities. These are our young people and HIV, sexually transmitted infections and teenage pregnancy can be prevented. They can legally have sex at 16 – so let us give them the right to freely access services and treatment” she stressed.

Bynoe-Sutherland also said that members of the BFPA Youth Advocacy Movement had shared that there was a large number of teens who did not feel they had parents that could help them navigate the issue of sexuality and that the BFPA therefore believed that it would be preferable to have young people, without parental support, be able to access information and services from competent qualified professionals who can, in addition to providing advice and treatment, ensure that they were not being sexually exploited or abused. “Our young people are very tech savvy and rather than sourcing arbitrary information from the internet or purchasing medication on line – I would prefer them to seek their parents out as a first step but where they cannot or fear recrimination – we want them to be able to seek a health or social work professional. In her words,”the common law has long recognized the concept of the “mature minor” and the right of him or her to access medical services and legislative and policy reform is needed in Barbados to ensure that professionals are able to comfortably deliver services without the fear of having to defend their decision making in court.  This fear has long stood as a barrier to service provision and our young people are often left without access.”

The BFPA welcomed the opportunity to engage in dialogue on this matter recognizing that there was a role for alternative approaches used by BFPA such as abstinence and age appropriate information to delay the entry of young people in to sexual activity. “The BFPA however will continue to stridently lobby on behalf of the often voiceless 16 and 17 years old young persons, who are sexually active, to ensure that they have access to information and treatment and to remove any policy barriers to access.” Bynoe-Sutherland concluded.

November 19, 2014


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

28 responses to “Barbados Family Planning Association Supports Initiative to Rationalize Age of Consent”


  1. agree with BFPA,, the law is contrary and defies logic ,where is the harm in giving a person access for protection,


  2. According to Director of the BFPA, Mrs. Juliette Bynoe–Sutherland, “the idea that young people across the country can be legally sexually active at 16 years old and not be able to prevent and access treatment for sexually transmitted infections or prevent unplanned pregnancies is deeply problematic and the BFPA for many years has been lobbying to close this gap”.


    OH !!..What a spin…….a real spin doctor here indeed…LOL

  3. Caswell Franklyn Avatar

    Now you can see why there is so much decadence in our society. When ZR and minibus drivers were jam busting, a manoeuvre that was illegal, the authorities changed the law to allow the hazardous practice rather than enforce the law.

    Young people become adults at age 18 and can access medical treatment without the consent of anyone. The law, on the other hand, allow the sexual exploitation of children at age 16. It would have been more sensible to raise the age of consent to 18 and seek to discourage sexual exploitation of children.

    To have sexual intercourse is an act that the law should reserve for adults. I daresay that it is a more responsible act than exercising your right to vote. If the law determines that it is lawful to have sex at 16 then the law should also say that you are an adult at 16 and give 16 year-olds the right to vote.

    The real problem is that there are too many old men and cougars, who have political power, who want to have sex with children. So rather than do the logical thing, we want to interfere with parents’ rights.


  4. the law if extended in essence will be .playing the role of a parent,, especially for those parents who are ill equipped or does play a sufficient responsible role in the affairs of their child lives, to those parents who have a hands on approach in educating their children about sexual norms and problems ( associated) this change of law would not have much of a bearing, but for those who would rather leave the law in its present stage are in the final stages of denial, one that puts their children lives in jeopardy while believing the false assumption that the law as is ,,,discourage teenage children from having sex, the explosion of teenage pregnancy across the Caribbean is testament to the fact that laws of this nature is an hindrance and not a help and should be change with immediacy


  5. We should not make the mistake of hardening positions, this is a very difficult issue and at the front must be the well being of the ‘victim’.


  6. Ideally the age of consent would have been raised to 18, but to do that now would be to criminalize a lot of 16 and 17 year olds who are already having sex, We have approximately 8,000 people in Barbados aged 16 and 17. If only 1/4 of that number are having sex, to raise the age of consent would criminalize the sexual activity of up to two thousand 16 and 17 year olds. Do we really want to do that? What would we do with these older teens, put all 2,000 to 8,000 of them in jail for unlawful sexual intercourse?

    And tobesides a lot of us know only too well that we were also having sex at 16 and 17. Should the government go back and retroactively criminalize our adolescent sexual activity?

    There is no point closing the stable door after the horse has escaped. And the horse dun escape generations ago.

    Barbadian teens have always had sex. For generations (yes our grandparents too) 50% of Bajan women have had their first child by age 19 (yes ya mudda too)


  7. http://www.thestar.com/life/2014/11/18/parry_sound_couple_celebrates_canadas_longest_marriage.html

    When 15 year olds marry and it works for 80 years we celebrate them. When they fall in love and have sex and it does not work we tell them how wufless they are.

    But teens have always fallen in love. My own great grand parents married at St. Silas Church when they were both 14, and she was a widow (single mother) with 14 children by age 42.


  8. Perhaps it is worthwhile to focus on the central issue addressed in the BFPA press release. If young girls are having sex the consequences of it must be addressed. It is old school to think we can force the genie back into the bottle given the shift in value positions and seeming rise in parental delinquency. We don’t have the village to raise the child any longer.


  9. When young girls have sex, and by young girls I mean those past their 16th birthday, but younger than 18; for most of them the sexual activity is in fact inconsequential, or as we said in the old days “they don’t get ketch” Some sadly catch STI’s and some become pregnant before they are ready to be parents. It is the latter two groups that we have to worry about since pregnancy can interrupt a girl’s education, and STI’s can interrupt or end a girl’s life. It is these latter 2 groups that we need to worry about. The BPFA has over many years has provided low cost contraceptives, and contraceptive and sexual health education services, and they should be commended.

    I agree witth the BFPA stance on this matter.

    Dear David: The village never raised the child. Good parents always raised their own children, with help principally from the grandmothers, especially the mother’s mother.


  10. I’ve always thought it weird that for generations the state had permitted 16 and 17 year olds to have sex.

    And yet the same state has forbidden them to make and attend a pre-natal appoint without parental consent.

    And has also forbidden them from accessing medical treatment for STI’s without parental consent.


  11. Read somewhere recently the view about the energy some organizations and justice systems exert to protect the right to life BUT when the child is born into poverty what happens? Go figure! Who can explain these things.


  12. @David ” when the child is born into poverty what happens?”

    That is a hard one David. That is when the parents, the grand parents, and what is left of the village has to pull together to help raise the child. And the State has to join the parents in their efforts.


  13. This is to give the political JAs on the blog what we are dealing with in BArbados.


  14. David did you read page 3 ? cat iss & pepper at de Cave. Hopefully our legal experts will offer an explanation for $700,000 fee.


  15. @Hants

    See recent BU blog.


  16. Looks like 3 strong, healthy, well nourished, well clad, well groomed young people of normal intelligence.


  17. David: What do you mean by serious problems? Do you mean tiefing? Insider contracts etc?


  18. 3 wannabee gangstas. These idiots expected to get away with a bank robbery in 2 x 4 Barbados.


  19. Dear Jamar:

    There is no point flashing the thumbs up sign?

    You did not not win the 100 meters at the Olympics, or a Nobel prize nor nothing so. You are flashing the sign now, but when you are in prison those friends will not come to visit you and they may even phoop yourgirl for you until such time as you come out again.


  20. That’s what wrong with amateurs they chose the wrong profession, now if they had only gone into the car rental business……..

  21. John Hanson 1781-1782- I SERVE1788- 1792 BARBADOES Avatar
    John Hanson 1781-1782- I SERVE1788- 1792 BARBADOES

    BUSTED , ,, Owen , Mia , Sir COW and Sir Ham ,,, still at large,


  22. @Simple Simon

    I dont think the book will be thrown at 16-17 years old who are having sex among themselves. The law will hopefully protect these age groups from older men and women.


  23. Parental guidance is the best form of protection,,but in todays society most parents having given up the role of parenting to govts .


  24. Thanks so much for the feed back. Many of you hit the dicey issues that policy makers are grappling with. What is absent in the discourse is the voice of 16 and 17 year olds. We hope to bring the range of views from that population forward – teen mothers and fathers, christian youth, sexually active young persons, sexually abused/exploited young persons. Its hard for many of them to speak up and out. We do not always encourage free expression and I hope are willing to listen when these young people speak up.

  25. Caswell Franklyn Avatar

    The Family Planning Association and Faith Marshall-Harris are not providing solutions, they have now become part of the problem. It is not that they don’t have good intentions: it is that their analysis of the problem is flawed. They need to emphasise wholesome lifestyles while not condemning those who have fallen short, but they must not put in place a regime to make falling short the standard.

    Most of these under-aged girls that get involved in sexual activity do so with men who in many cases are older than their fathers. What is being proposed is an avenue where these nasty men can escape detection and ultimately justice.

    This is the same mentality that promoted the idea of condoms in prison ostensibly to prevent the spread HIV/AIDS, that is to put a mechanism in place to facilitate an illegal act.

    >


  26. @Caswell

    This is a vexing issue and must be tackled on several fronts. The nature of society means deviant behaviour is with us, we must help those who can’t help themselves read 13 and 14 year olds and yes deal with the hardback men who prey on the vulnerable.


  27. David

    I agree that the matter must be tackled on several fronts but do you see any efforts on the other fronts.

    Sent from my iPad

    >


  28. The family planners can only provide laws that would tackle and provide protection to all of society .the issue with family planning borders and stems from a lack of overall parental guidance. the laws are in no way to be interrupted as govt taking over the role as parents.however where their is a necessary need for govt intervention then and only then pro-action necessary for govt involvement as a need of protection should be done so with sound advice

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading