Submitted by Green Monkey
Professional Engineers, civil Engineers, structural Engineers, mechanical engineers, fire protection engineers, chemical engineers, a metallurgical engineer, an electrical engineer, an ex-military combat engineer, architects, ex-firefighters, scientists (inlcuding mathementaticians, chemists and physicists) explain why the National Institute of Sceince and Technology (NIST) explanation for the destruction of the 3 WTC towers on 9/11 solely as the result of the collision of the hijacked airliners and resulting office fires or, in the case of WTC 7, just office fires alone, is a coverup.
These enigneers, scientists and academics believe that sinces the bulk of the evidence from the WTC site was shipped out before it was subject to a forensic examination; since NIST ignored multiple reports by first responders, news reporters and others witnesses of explosions and flashes of light at the time of (or just prior to) the collapses; since NIST did not follow established procedure as laid out in regulations to test for incendiaries at sites of building destructions where molten steel or molten concrete is found ( both were found at the WTC after 9/11); since NIST ignored the evidence of the minute iron spheres in the WTC dust (evidence of much higher temperatures than can be caused by office fires or burning jet fuel); and since NIST final explanations of the way the buildings fell are clearly in contravention of some very fundamental laws of physics, their investigaion is invalid. They believe the NIST reports must be rejected and a new investigation, independent of government, completed which will look at all the available evidence and take into full account the laws of physics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ (2hr 15min)