The politics practised in Barbados is based on the adversarial system borrowed from the colonial master. There is the opposite more consensus (constructive) type of politics but such as approach seems esoteric and anathema to who we have been educated to be. 

The first past the post system gives the victor the spoils and leaves no room for political parties to meaningfully collaborate on issues of national importance. To observers a key differentiator between political parties in the adversarial system is the ability to generate criticism even when it is not warranted. The result is a torrent of vacuous commentary useless to adding value to what is required.

There is a thin line to observe when critiquing the ability of a people in a well functioning democracy the right to dissent that has oversight for the collective. The challenge will always be the ability of the national leadership to contribute to an ethos that encourages cognitive reasoning.

We enter a period of transition to a Republican style system to signal to our people we must be craftsmen of our fate to continually search for ways to unshackle our minds from mental slavery. Whether in thought words, deeds and use of symbols educating our people that indigenous and original thinking must define and give vent to who we are as Barbadians must be prioritized. This critique must extend to the system of politics influencing how we govern.

In simple analogy, if there is a tumour in the body the best chance of survival is to remove it. If we survey the social and economic landscape of Barbados it is honest to surmise that there has been an alarming degradation of systems and quality of life for Barbadians; there is an inertia that breaths life to the cliche we suffer from implementation deficit, a casual acceptance that indiscipline in our people is reflected in wanton lawlessness; crime, disrespect for the environment and so on. To the detractors, quality of life is based on the criteria of the human development index.

To fundamentally change anything one must effect changes at the root cause. The governance system has relaxed to the point people participation is only required when the political class calls an election. Placing an X on a ballot is just one means of citizen participation in a healthy democracy. We have to modify the current system of governance to encourage every day citizen participation. We must be able to leverage from the majority of what is deposited in the national knowledge pool. The culture of secrecy by central government and the public service, a legacy of our colonial past has to change.

Nearly 50 years our elected officials (DLP and BLP) have avoided enacting and operationalizing transparency legislation. Talking heads from both political parties and members of the political class present ‘compelling’ reasons why the legislation and supporting activity has not been implemented AND we supinely accept it. Who should be blamed for the current state of affairs? The politicians mirror YOU, YOU, YOU. We were raised in the same neighbourhoods, attended the same schools, hangout in the same bars and restaurants, marry into families. Politicians are not aliens, they are born from the same environment we are part. For there to be meaningful change YOU, YOU and YOU must lead the CHANGE.

You, You and You must become more involved in the running of the country. Demand more from our leadership via the channels available, protest action and other forms of civil disobedience. Disengagement is not a sensible option.

208 responses to “BLP and DLP Cancer of Adversarial Politics”


  1. The battle for St. John

    St John MP Touts ‘Half-century’s achievements’ in three years: https://barbadostoday.bb/2021/05/26/st-john-mp-touts-half-centurys-achievements-in-three-years/


  2. Hé is happy that Charles is getting thing done but there we prospects that were left in the pipeline because DEM ain’t had the money?

    When DEM left office there was less money in the treasury than when DEM took over

    Poor excuse or even more reason Charles will beat him

    Also. I seem like DEM ain’t learn from the by election – people will tell you to your face that they agree with / support you but on Election Day the support don’t convert to an x next to your name


  3. https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js


  4. DavidJune 2, 2021 1:00 PM

    That was clearly coming, long time. Verla gone. Now Hewitt just has to get Lashley, Estwick et al on his side. Not that it will be easy, not when alla dem want it.


  5. @Crusoe

    Rev Guy will not be accepted by the establishment. Certainly not by the usual talking heads.


  6. WTH????

    He only just denied any interest!

    Never say never does not mean next week!

    Who can trust anything he says again?


  7. DavidJune 2, 2021 1:30 PM Crusoe Rev Guy will not be accepted by the establishment. Certainly not by the usual talking heads.

    Verla has not been accepted either. Is the issue that they disagree with policies or is the issue that each of them want it for themselves?

    Methinks the second. Ha ha. They are like the Senators around Caesar, except they will stab each other too, to get it.

    Imagine the powa that comes with PMship. They must be salivating.


  8. @Crusoe

    The debate is that he breaks from the mould of the traditional politician.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading