Whether studying the issue in the classroom or conversing in a rum shop the amount and timing of the implementation of a national minimum wage generates robust discussion in any country. Pros and cons are easy to find on both sides of the contentious issue.

The Barbados government some suggest are moving like the proverbial bull in a china shop to implement a minimum wage of $8.50, up from $6.25 with security guards to get $9.25 to take effect on All Fools Day 2021. The trade unions are saying it is too low and it should be implemented without delay. Some in the private sector suggest it is too high and the date of introduction is too aggressive.

This government’s decision to increase the minimum wage is commendable and long overdue. The evidence support in the last 5 years there has been significant upward movement in the rate of inflation and the Retail Price Index supports Barbados being an expensive place to live.

The concern by parties of the dispassionate kind entering the debate is not the amount of the minimum wage being introduced but its timing. Moving from $6.25 to $8.50 is significant. Its introduction must be weighed against how the market is likely to respond. Unfortunately this is an unknown. After more than 10 years of a struggling economy many businesses are operating with depleted cashflows. Bear in mind COVID 19 would have exacerbated stress to the profit and loss of many businesses. It is easy for some to sit in the armchair and make the uninformed assumption that all businesses make money. Many operate at the margins.

On the biscuit and cheese side of the discussion, the data supports those earning at a subsistence level must be experiencing an enormous challenge. The obvious position is that a caring society must find ways to support the most vulnerable. The blogmaster will not join the politically motivated and uninformed crews by shouting the minimum wage should be hiked to $10.00 and to hell with considering the consequences. Many debating the issue are unaware this is a debate raging in many countries including the most developed.

It may be useful for the calculus used by the technicians to be made public. The majority of Barbadians will not understand it but it make help to deflate the emotional arguments that a national minimum wage amount is not determined by pulling from a hat.

It seems the majority of opinion from the private sector is that the timing is bad given the vagaries of market of the last 13 years and the consequential negative impact. From the view of trade unions and under-represented workers, now is the best time because of the current state of things.

In is against this background the government has had to make a tough decision.

The blogmaster is always amused when decisions – as in this case moving forward with the implementation of a minimum wage is made – several interest groups will make themselves heard post facto. What is the purpose of the tripartite arrangement (Social Partnership) we beat our chest again? The discord the many dissenting views must cause the public does not help to inflate confidence into the Barbados space. In a situation like this why the social partnership could not have agreed to a communique registering the different concerns after discussing government’s decision to move ahead? It seems all issues in the country have to be resolved after a predictable adversarial process. Historically this has not been the Barbados way.

Whether the government folds to the request of private sector to suspend the hike in minimum wage or not, there is a problem to solve.

How do we (society) protect the vulnerable and marginalized worker in the society at a difficult time.

How does government implement a minimum wage policy to equatable redistribute income in the society.

So far the statement on the matter from Andrew Bynoe of A1 supermarkets is one of the more sensible ones registering with the blogmaster.

I would even advocate moving to $10 an hour to somebody who works for 40 hours, so they would have a gross take-home pay of $400. However, having said that, the cost of living has to be addressed, because for businesses to be able to support the minimum wage up to $10, we have to look at the other areas of costs that affect the running of businesses…Employees would have to honour efficiency and higher productivity within the workplace…

Andrew Bynoe

354 responses to “Minimum Wage (Yes) Timing (No?)”


  1. angela cox March 28, 2021 10:03 AM #: “Again what is the inflation rate inclusive of taxes and govt implemented measures to garnish revenue eroding wages earned.”

    In your March 28, 2021 7:54 AM contribution, you wrote, “So happy to the hear that at the end of the 40 hr work week no income taxes are deducted from the paltry income which can account to be around 340bds dollars.”

    Remember, we’re still discussing minimum wages. Regardless of inflation, the tax threshold for someone earning a minimum wage remains unchanged, i.e. $25,000 per annum.

    For you to ask, “Again what is the inflation rate inclusive of taxes and govt implemented measures to garnish revenue eroding wages earned,” clearly indicates you’re not THINKING.


  2. And to u Artax
    My mention of low end workers deduction of income tax cause u to fly off the yard fowl fence
    However one not to let people pull the wool over my eyes seek other sources in the know for confirmation
    This is what was stated all employers are required to deduct income taxes from all workers wages and those taxes along with earned income must be reported to govt
    At the time of income tax annual filing there is a system in place which takes in to account whose indivudual or business income did not meet the required thresholds for taxes to deducted annually quarterly or weekly and govt therefore issues a refund
    U respond if u do does not matter at this point
    I take what the source said as gospel
    Have a nice day yardfowl


  3. “indicating that their lowest paid employees were remunerated at an hourly rate between $6.25 and $8. Some 13 employers paid $6.25 or lower, including three that paid $6 per hour.”

    none of them have any shame….those wages barely covered essentials in the 1980…and they have them still in play in 2021…and if the G4S workers did not protest….government won’t lift a finger to see these people get liveable wages….

    BDS$6.25 = $3.125 US
    BDS$6.00 = $3.00 US

    ya will be hardpressed to find illegal immigrants working for that slave salary in US.


  4. If the people in business in Barbados cant pay 8.50$ which is still a slave wage then they need not be in business, no less than 11.00$ by 2023, those who dont want to pay 8.50 all need boycotting, When I enter a store and asked “are you making the new wage” and the workers say NO< that is the time I will walk out and shop elsewhere or not at all, the same families fun the city with the help of Dirty Lawyers,, The Dirty blacks, whites, Indians, Syrians and the sell-out BBDLP all feel the workers are their slaves When the Slave raise up! ,what will they say,? “””” If We knew We would do this and that,” We can shop from our own, and cut out eating fast food is sold . The people need more pain to wake up and all these crooks feel they have the upper hand, We low people know what going on on the ground, Your time to suffer will soon come, better hope planes are still flying and the US Ships are not out there to pick up these money laundering offshore banking crooks!,BFP


  5. Crusoe…had you in my thoughts…let the year progress and i will post in more detail so you can get a better picture…still a work in progress.


  6. @ William Skinner

    JOKERS ARE MAKING A BIG DEAL BD$8.50 @ hr. LONG OVERDUE 2 1/2 YEARS AGO.

    I NEVER PAID MY FORMER EMPLOYEES ON THE 2 X 3 ISLAND LESS THAN $400 PER WEEK WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN THE CLEANER BEING THE LOWEST PAID EMPLOYEE.

    THEY WOULD HOWEVER LIKE TO COMPARE TO OVERSEAS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES WHEN THEY ARE USED TO EXPLOITING EACH OTHER FOR PEANUTS..

    CLARKE, ALLEN FIELDS, BYNOE ETC., CANNOT LIVE OFF BD$10 AN HOUR WHILST LIVING HIGH ON THE HOG OFF THEIR WORKERS EFFORTS.


  7. angela cox March 28, 2021 11:35 AM #: ”

    RE: “My mention of low end workers deduction of income tax cause u to fly off the yard fowl fence.”

    There is none on BU that epitomizes ‘yardfowlism’ other than you. You view everything from the narrow perspective of BLP versus DLP.

    And, as is anticipated, being unable to sustain a reasonable argument, you resort to personal abuse. According to your ‘self-appointed lawyer,’ it is a result of learning by rote.

    RE: “However one not to let people pull the wool over my eyes seek other sources in the know for confirmation. This is what was stated all employers are required to deduct income taxes from all workers wages and those taxes along with earned income must be reported to govt.”

    The sources you sought for confirmation “pulled the wool over (your) eyes.” They are DEFINITELY NOT “in the know.” They are just as STUPID as you are.

    Personal Income Tax

    Individuals

    Who should file a Personal Income Tax (PIT) return?

    ….. All self-employed persons

    ….. Employees with an annual income above $25,000

    ….. Contributory pensioners with an annual income (from any source) above $40,000

    A Personal Income Tax return is required to be filed once a year by April 30, for the previous calendar year’s earnings. For example, your 2019 return (what you earned in 2019) should be filed in TAMIS by April 30 of the following year.

    https://bra.gov.bb/Filing/

  8. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @David, good discussion …
    I was mildly surprised by the comment from the Pacha that unions have outlived their usefulness (with which I would agree in part) and then mystified by your retort that rather it’s that they are not “fit for purpose”!

    Pray tell bro, if they were created for said purpose and are in your view no longer fit for it, then ipso … they have outlived their usefulness , not so! 🙈

    Clearly a minimum wage is invariably lots of hot air as there can be no viable argument (beyond economic blather) about what is the worth for a person to work 40 hours a week and yet still basically be well below the poverty line!

    This is one debate where I would readily accept that our plantocracy legacy is NOT a canard which drives this mentality.!

    The new owners of capital (all races) want to get maximum work for minimum wage distribution and of course in between are those once useful (and now self serving not fit for purpose, you say) unions.

    It’s about power, self importance, snobbery (racism euphemistically) … that drives any remuneration issue by the modern day bosses

    Anyhow, another time to palaver more.

    @Skinner, bro you’re too touchous re this US tingy.

    The Blogmaster made a very truthful and transparent, generic remark re (“In your neck of the woods some call it pork barrel stuff.”).

    It all POLITICS is basically what he was stressing.

    And u went off like the proverbial loaded gun. … of course that’s your 2nd amendment right 😂 to carry in your state but when to rapid fire like that should be more ‘stop and reflect’ … not so!😎

    @Northern, you have been hitting hard in recent posts with the biting sarcasm… is this your new style post covid🙃.

    And @Senor Artax, you just keep on hitting hard … period.👍🏿

    Good stuff all around.

    I gone.


  9. @Dee Word

    There is a role for unions if it reinvents itself to respond to how T&C of employment has changed and the explosion of knowledge workers working oftentimes in hybrid workplaces. The field worker tactics shelf life has expired long time now.


  10. Glad to see that it’s all now being taken seriously and no longer a joke to be bounced around on BU..


  11. Miserable Mariposa.

    Are you happy the poor people getting a raise or not?

    Inflation increased under ur party and the not the wages. Why the crocodile tears now?


  12. @ David BU

    It’s becoming more and more difficult trying to discuss issues on BU, with some level of rationality and objectivity.


  13. Mari

    If they have to pay more into NIS when the time comes for them to benefit from NIS ( unemployment / pension) they will do so at itches increased rate. Do you have a problem with that or is that too hard for you to understand?


  14. I can’t even imagine working for that lowest of the low salary, another bunch of slave master wannabes are those NGOs on the harbor road, back in 2005..they would tell you with a straight face that they pay US2.50 an hour, which is BDS5.00 an hour….something must be done about this slave environment on the island…then they want to pretend that they are not the ones fueling poverty and CRIME…with the full back of government.


  15. Money paid into NIS does not go towards foreign DEBT


  16. Northern…this was for you, fingers and brain doing two different things today…

    had you in my thoughts…let the year progress, a lttle after the summer, and i will post in more detail so you can get a better picture, i know ya anxious to read in entirety…still a work in progress


  17. @Artax

    You mean some on BU love the emotional arguments. Make your comments and scroll.


  18. “The perfect is the enemy of the good.”

    We all agree that there needs to be an increase in the wages of those who are earning in the neighborhood of $6.00/hour.

    Read the articles above and note that this discussion has been going on for ages and yet little is being done.

    See how some (cleverly) agree that some wages should increase but not today. Reductio ad absurdum: I am for a $300.00 minimum wage, but not today. These are just words, they mean nothing. Just thrown in to look good. Giving a lot and at the same time not giving anything. A distraction.

    Let us try to get more money in the hands of who really needs it. If you think $8.50 is too little, then let’s fight for $8.50 today and continue our fight for a higher wage. What we should not do is to rule out $8.50 today and then ten years down the road, we are still fighting to raise that $6.00 for $10.00 and glad to accept $8.50 as a compromise.

    The perfect is the enemy of the good. Let’s do good today.


  19. @William Skinner March 27, 2021 8:49 PM “Even with joint incomes of $2000 per month , such housing is out of reach. It is therefore obvious that unless we pay workers a proper wage, they will find even basic home ownership difficult. We think that these houses will end up being owned by speculators as rental properties.”

    The workers need a better wage. I myself would not pay anybody $6.25 BDS per hour in 2021. I paid my hairdresser $20 per hour last week. She DESERVES every penny.

    However in every country of the world there are some individuals and families who are never able to own their own house. And “yes” government ie. the taxpayers have a responsibility to provide rental housing for those people, just as employers have a responsibility to pay a decent living wage.

    However I don’t agree with you that “these houses will end up being owned by speculators as rental properties.” From experience modest income houses at Wanstead, West Terrace, Husbands, and the “Venezuelan Project” and other places have not “ended up being owned by speculators as rental properties” because Barbadians, especially working class Bajan women will go to extraordinary lengths to hold on to their homes. They will not drink, not smoke, not gamble, enjoy little paid entertainment, they will take lunches from home every day for 20 year, they will defer car ownership for decades at a time, they will bake and sell coconut bread, fishcakes, pudding and souse, have their shoes repaired again and again, make their own clothes etc, etc, etc. I myself when I was trying to maintain a foothold on the housing ladder looked after 2 elementary aged children [2 different families] at nights for years at a time because their parents [policeman, newspaper person, factory workers] were sometimes or oftentimes required to work at night. So even though it will be difficult I expect that most of the people who buy these houses will be able to hold on. Should they have to make such extraordinary sacrifices? Perhaps “no”, but many people will.


  20. John2March 28, 2021 12:16 PM

    Mari

    If they have to pay more into NIS when the time comes for them to benefit from NIS ( unemployment / pension) they will do so at itches increased rate. Do you have a problem with that or is that too hard for you to understand?

    My problem with your comment stems from the fact that in less that five years what they would have put into the NIS would have been eroded by inflation prices
    So where are the gains u tell me except to say that govt held the money for about twenty or thirty years with the individual seeing nothing of benefit to them
    As inflation rises govtl should increase the level of payout to contributors to accommodate the rise in inflation
    No I am not miserable just observing a smoke and mirror plan which has little benefit to the hard worker


  21. Mari
    Where was that opinion under the DLP government?

    There was no minimum wage increase or government workers increase but inflation increased all the time .


  22. What percentage is paid into NIS for the future security of the worker

    If they are getting a $2 increase I doubt it is more the $0.50.

    Yet you can find something to complain about


  23. Have you guys not made the point many times over? Why repeat over and over, it does not nothing for the discussion.


  24. Govt jump the gun on the wage increase
    No real thought was given on this issue by govt
    Instead of govt using the increase as a political football to gain traction among low end workers
    Govt kick the football way out of the end zone
    With an overheated inflated economy high unemployment govt job was to provide an economic foundation formulated to heal and enegerised the economy
    Instead the govt laid a path of a smoke and mirror plan disgused as a work increase which cannot heal or benefit the economy or in reality bring unemployment down or drive down or slow down the rate of inflation
    These factors which when combined fiscally makes for creating growth placing the economy on a path for healing
    The real issue should at this present time be on stimulating the economy with various
    stimulus pkgs ( known as money in the consumer hand ) a mechanism which govt should have done but refuse to do so
    By doing so a multiprogned economical approach would have taken place which in turn lays out a proper foundation for a better wage increase


  25. The timetable to rollout a national minimum wage was announced by the prime minister last year when the G4S labour dispute reared.

    https://dailycarib.com/pm-multiple-rate-floors-for-workers-coming/


  26. @Donna March 28, 2021 7:51 AM “…order good custom made furniture from a joiner that would last a lifetime!”

    Actually good custom made furniture lasts mote than one lifetime. I still have and use everyday my mother’s custom made mahogany dresser which she had Mr. Webster make for her on the occasion of her marriage in 1940. 80 years old and still in perfect condition, the knobs have NEVER fallen off unlike some dressers I have bought both here and abroad and discarded since then, dressers where the knobs fall off in your hands when they are less than 10 years old. I could probably sell my mother’s to an antique dealer for $5,000 or so, but I do not wish to sell. When I close my eyes It is for a favorite young relative of mine who appreciates old fine craftsmanship. I have my father’s folding easy chair too which he took with him to Trinidad in 1940, and brought back when he returned in 1944, Slept in the folding chair on the deck of the ship which provided transport to and from Trinidad. Some other family members have hat-racks and whatnots etc.

  27. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @DIW
    Happy to see you back. The answer my friend is blowing in the wind…..I am not yet in a post Covid world, so I cannot say.
    While Pacha and I are not known to be cut from the same cloth, I take his position on unions. While some, like SenCF, seem to appreciate the ‘extras’ he can offer to make membership cost valuable, this is lost for the most part in the big unions. They struggle with “value” beyond “the cause”. This Covid ‘pause’ has offered many the opportunity to re-invent themselves?


  28. @de pedantic Dribbler March 28, 2021 11:50 AM “The new owners of capital (all races) want to get maximum work for minimum wage distribution and of course in between are those once useful (and now self serving not fit for purpose, you say) unions. It’s about power, self importance, snobbery (racism euphemistically)…that drives any remuneration issue by the modern day bosses.”

    i like how you did not engage in no lotta long talk, but rather got straight to the point.

    You are of course CORRECT.

  29. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @David March 28, 2021 2:38 PM
    conceptually ‘nice’, but the multiple wage levels are a nightmare to conceptualize, far less, implement. It is a ‘no-win’ idea for the political class.


  30. @NO

    Politicians must look for wins. Especially when battling from a difficult situation.


  31. Women in the community can organize and get this thing done…we can do it. Stop looking to politicians, they are crooks.

    “South Africa’s first female-owned bank was founded by four women.
    Women around the world are winning and proving that they don’t belong “in the other room”.
    These female bank owners are role models to the girl-child aspiring to greatness.”


  32. William…People on Facebook are saying these little boxes look like slave huts…this time painted…they can do nothing without a slave theme for the African population.

    https://scontent.fbgi3-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/166506581_10159301413159085_4928717587154088702_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=nUaCP1Xq7GQAX8ELGkm&_nc_ht=scontent.fbgi3-1.fna&oh=484cf67d62db0d2ba229fd5e3cd4aa40&oe=60869F19


  33. Once again the govt used hot and sweaty planning in their introduction of wage increase
    The long and short being the employees being the biggest losers
    The economy stutters rolls and shake along the same ole economical fault line with no signs of being energized
    Unemployment rate rises
    Inflation stays the course
    What a well planned disatrous approach by a govt with consultants and a cabinet the size of mt. Rushmoore
    As the old foljs says big heads does not mean big brain are resides in them

  34. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @ac
    wait…earlier you were on about ‘inflation rate’ (which could have some merit) and now you pen, it ‘stays the course’.
    Mt.Rushmore bears the sculpted likeness of FOUR, only four, former US presidents. Not a good comparison.
    How can employees lose if they are getting a raise?
    Since I note with interest, your relatively new found comprehension of Debt and borrowing, possibly you could offer suggestions for changing the course?


  35. The employees are the biggest losers if they are getting about an extra $1.50 /hr in hand .

    Tell that to those employees at the end of April .. they are losers


  36. Why
    Because the 8.50; earned cannot in all possibility rised or compete on the same level against inflated prices taxes and fees
    The 8 50 can be called a mockly confabulation of the masses
    Govt role is to stimulate the economy during a pandemic not to agitate or aggravate the economy or the citizens with a heavy dose of smoke and mirrors
    It is the economy stupid


  37. The timetable to rollout a national minimum wage was announced by the prime minister last year when the G4S labour dispute reared.

    https://dailycarib.com/pm-multiple-rate-floors-for-workers-coming/

    Xxxxxxxxx

    CORRECTION:

    YOUR ATTEMPT TO LIE FOR THE BLP 2021 GOVERNMENT AT ALL COST WHILST SPINNING THE TRUTH DESERVES TO GO IN THE TRASHCAN WHERE IT BELONGS.

    THE BLP GOVERNMENT IN ITS 2018 MANIFESTO PROMISED THAT WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF BEING ELECTED TO GOVERNMENT WOULD IMPLEMENT A MINIMUM WAGE NOW COMING 3 YEARS LATER ON ALL FOOLS DAY AFTER SAID ELECTION.

    STOP BEING A STRANGER TO THE TRUTH WHEN IT COMES TO THE BLP GOVERNMENT YOU SUPPORT 100 PERCENT.


  38. Putting cart before the horse had been this govt downfall
    Time and time again has the govt rolled out policies that have come back to big govt in the arse
    This new policy has all the exact failures as policies before
    The economy cannot be driven solely on a one pronged approach of a small increase of wages while the bulk economic moorings holds on for dear life seeking help for revival
    Putting the cart before horse is imminent disaster


  39. @ NorthernObserver March 28, 2021 4:44 PM

    Angela Cox keeps referring to inflation. She previously mentioned the inflation rate has been increasing and now she’s suggesting it “stays the course.”

    Rather than research issues and familiarize herself with the topic and make her contribution based on facts, she prefers instead, to construct her opinions based on emotion……… what she ‘feels,’ which often leads her to post erroneous or misleading comments to BU.

    This is a clear indication she is engaging in discussing a topic, of which she does not have any knowledge or understanding.

    The following are the inflation rates from 2008 to 2020.

    2020 2.9
    2019 4.1
    2018 3.7
    2017 4.7
    2016 1.3
    2015 -1.1
    2014 1.8
    2013 1.8
    2012 4.5
    2011 9.4
    2010 5.8
    2009 3.6
    2008 8.1

    Remember, Cox asked what was the inflation rate and based her arguments on a correlation between the rate and wages. I provided her with the rates for the 12 month period ended December 31, 2019 and 2020 respectively. It is interesting to note, she completely ignored the information, to focus on NIS and income tax…… another topic which she also does not understand.

    The hourly rate for shop assistants is currently $7.50 or $300 per week ($15,600 per annum). And, as I mentioned previously, at the end of 2020, the inflation rate was reported to be 2.9%. If we use this rate as an example to calculate an increase in wages based on inflation, then:

    2.9% x 100 = 0.029. 1.029 x $15.600 = $16,052 or $7.72 per hour ($308.70/week).

    Please be reminded, I also alluded to the fact that I’ve not read any contribution in which its author indicated $8.50 is an adequate or satisfactory minimum wage rate per hour.
    Ironically, some contributors are making baseless criticisms of the proposed $8.50 rate. Yet, I haven’t seen any of them present what, in their opinion, would be a reasonable rate and why.

    As it relates to the income tax, the current threshold is $25,000 per annum, which means income taxes are NOT DEDUCTED from the salaries/wages of any individual earning up to $2,084 per month or $480.77 per week. Anyone who suggests otherwise, is guilty of attempting to mislead the forum.

    However, earnings in excess of $25,000 per annum is taxable.


  40. You need to read with understanding or go and fix your nails.


  41. Economic stupidity is what got the DLP a big fat 0 and in the wilderness now

    What you are doing is trying to keep down the poor man when they most need help .

    These are the same people that will take the small increase and put it directly back into the economy immediately

    I don’t expect you to understand what that means for the economy . You are to blinkered


  42. All agree a minimum wage should be fixed at a level that ensures those at the bottom operate above the poverty line. That said the economists and those charged with its calculation agree there is a balance to be maintained with the equilibrium market wage to avoid issues. Besides lay people shouting for a higher minimum wage there are other variables in the equation to consider which is way above the our level of understanding.


  43. Here now we have the DLP joining with big business and try to keep down the poor

    Keep it up you all playing right into your own destruction


  44. I stand by my comments
    A blind man does not have to scroll through a ledger of annual reports to see how the cost of living is rising daily in leaps in bounds
    All one have to do is a comparison of how much of worth wss a dollar spent a year ago and compare it to what it is worth today in spent
    No one in their right mind can argue that the prices have not risen astronomically over the year and such an effect on the 8.50 would not get better
    I never said anything to indicate that inflation should stay the course
    However I did indicate that with the rise in cost of living inflation along with other negative factors would continue because of govt policies which can inflate rather than resolve


  45. angela cox March 28, 2021 4:03 PM

    Once again the govt used hot and sweaty planning in their introduction of wage increase

    The long and short being the employees being the biggest losers

    The economy stutters rolls and shake along the same ole economical fault line with no signs of being energized

    Unemployment rate rises

    Inflation stays the course

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    “Unemployment rate rise, INFLATION STAYS THE COURSE.”

    YOUR words, NOT mine or those of NorthernObserver.


  46. angela cox March 28, 2021 6:19 PM #: “I never said anything to indicate that inflation should stay the course.”

    You are misrepresenting the truth, in other words, you’re lying. No one mentioned anything about you ‘saying’ “that inflation should stay the course.”

    NorthernObserver March 28, 2021 4:44 PM #: “@ac – wait…earlier you were on about ‘inflation rate’ (which could have some merit) and now you pen, it ‘stays the course.’.”

    Artax March 28, 2021 5:46 PM #: “Angela Cox keeps referring to inflation. She previously mentioned the inflation rate has been increasing and now she’s suggesting it “stays the course.”


  47. yes my words but it how you read and interpret them

    inflation stays the course because of govt policies
    so yes on that line and how govt continue to react without having a sound and substantial way of moving the inflation needle in the opposite direction
    INFLATION WOULD STAYTHE COURSE along with more erosion of the dollar until govt find a resolution to stop the economic bleeding


  48. angela cox March 28, 2021 6:42 PM #: “inflation stays the course because of govt policies. so yes on that line and how govt continue to react without having a sound and substantial way of moving the inflation needle in the opposite direction.”

    Could you explain the above comment and indicate what government policies you’re referring to?


  49. know what I said and my intent of saying
    However the question now to be asked of govt is how is govt going to resolve the problem of high inflation which affects people pocket books and the economy
    8.50 per hour sure as hell cant do it
    Not even a jumpstart heading towards gaining traction to pull the economy out of this devastating spiral
    Deal with that

Leave a Reply to WURA-War-on-UCancel reply

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading