A home mortgage is the price people pay for having a house before it is fully paid for. The price the unfortunate homeowners must pay is very high indeed – they must repay more than twice what they borrowed.

Why would people choose to repay so much, in an uncertain economy, for 30-years? Why would people agree to risk losing their house, and all the payments they made, if they missed paying their monthly payments? The simple answer is that new homeowners are normally desperate, uninformed, and easily taken advantage of.

NO-INTEREST OPTION.
Potential homeowners should know that they have a better financing option. Couples can pay for their house in six years, instead of 30, and pay no interest whatsoever. To do this, a group of 12 couples must agree to form a company to build 12 starter houses.

Each person in the group must agree to pay the monthly amount that they would normally pay on a 30-year mortgage for a starter house, for six years. Two strong and durable starter houses (1,000 sq ft, 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom, 1 pantry/laundry room, open concept), that can withstand Category 5 hurricanes and magnitude 7 earthquakes, should be built each year, with the final two being built in year six.

REDUCING RISKS.
There are several methods of reducing the risks of persons not paying their monthly amounts. First, the time is reduced to 6 years, by having each of the 24 persons make the payments. Second, it is for couples, where a person’s spouse can assist if there is a temporary financial challenge. Third, it is for a starter house, where the payments should be affordable for all participants.


To further reduce repayment risks, all twelve properties (houses and lands) should be owned by a company, that is owned by all the homeowners. After all houses have been built, the ownership of each property should be transferred to the respective couple.


In the event of death or disability, each couple should have term-insurance for six years, where the company is the beneficiary.

To address temporary financial challenges, each couple should have an emergency credit card, with a credit limit of six monthly payments. This card should only be used to make emergency monthly payments. To keep persons accountable, the credit card’s monthly statements should be copied to the company.

TERMINATION.
If a couple’s financial situation is so dire, that their only option is to use their emergency credit card to make payments for three consecutive months, then they will likely put the program at risk. The other persons will have to decide whether to increase their monthly amounts to assist the couple in need, or terminate the agreement with the couple. If a couple’s agreement with the company is terminated, then the company should take a short-term loan of the total amount that the couple contributed, for a duration of the remainder of the 6 years. The couple in need should receive the total amount that they paid, less the interest on the loan. A new couple should then be invited to take their place.
At the end of six years, the 12 couples can agree to either close the company, or build one house each year to sell and generate wealth.

BAD ADVICE.
The question is, if a couple can own a comfortable, strong and durable starter house in six years, and pay no interest, then why don’t they do this? Why would anyone pay more than twice the value of their house, and risk losing it if monthly payments are missed over the uncertainty of 30 years?

The simple answer is that they received bad advice, and should dissuade others from doing the same. However, if 12 couples cannot be found in Barbados, to demonstrate how wealth may be created, then we are doing the next generation of Barbadians a grave disservice.

Grenville Phillips II is a Chartered Structural Engineer. He can be reached at NextParty246@gmail.com

61 responses to “Difficult Conversations – How to own your house in six years”


  1. @Cuhdear

    So it’s official ?


  2. Pach:

    You are, as normal, always wrong with your baseless accusations.

    I have a word limit in my weekly articles. The first presented a description of the concept. The second is to present the numbers to support its workability. Wise up.


  3. @Sargeant March 25, 2021 8:59 PM @Cuhdear. So it’s official?”

    Lol!

    I am a child of the sun.


  4. Yes Grenville
    We’ve been wrong about everything under the Sun.

    And you have been and will always be a rightness!


  5. No Patch:

    You have been consistently wrong with your baseless accusations – always.

    I am no longer in elective politics, so you do not need to continue with them. Why not simply, for once, just focus on the topic?


  6. Grenville
    It’s incredible the notion that you are no longer in elective politics..

    And incredible only means not credible.

    We are therefore wrong to have always assumed that your thirst for powah, so unbridled, could have been constrained by successive defeats.

    Unlike most here, we have no determination to be right at anytime.


  7. MillerMarch 25, 2021 7:26 AM

    @ John March 25, 2021 1:12 AM
    “Would work with family oriented cultures.
    I know of investments clubs that work something like that developing land.”
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Would the Bajan closed brethren community qualify as a good example to be followed by the poor (black) Bajan community?

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Don’t know enough about their ownership model to comment.

    I’ve collected about a dozen examples of families who worked together to build wealth.

    The legal agreements and conveyances are practically identical except that the names of the participants and assets change.

    In those examples, housing is a perquisite the company owes the individual company owner.

    You don’t have to own the cow to drink milk!!

    All you have to do is own the entity that owns the cow and you will drink milk, once the cow is productive.


  8. Pach:

    Again, you are entirely wrong in your baseless accusation – as is your consistent custom.

    I have no thirst for power. I declined the BAPE presidency 5 times, before finally accepting it. I much prefer to work in the background, as I have for most of my career.

    This is all easily verifiable, but it never stopped you from spreading lies, and encouraging others to do the same. Wise up.


  9. There is HOPE for some.

    ” Government is off to a good start towards achieving its goal of 640 housing solutions in this financial year, breaking ground earlier today on construction of 165 middle-income units under the Home Ownership Providing Energy (HOPE) initiative at Vespera Gardens, Lancaster, St James.”

    https://www.nationnews.com/2021/03/26/govt-launches-hope-project-lancaster/


  10. We need to see more of these type of innovations across the sectors Hants. Let us hope it comes to fruition.


  11. I hope the housing project comes to fruition as well.

    But, why establish a company, HOPE Inc., to undertake construction of the houses, when the requisite resources could have been invested in the NHC?

    Such ‘political maneuvers’ always arouse suspicion of untoward motives.

    A ‘special unit,’ for example, could have been established within the NHC, for the specific purpose of constructing those houses.

    All many of the statutory and quasi government corporations need is an urgent reform of their operational procedures to improve efficiency so they could effectively fulfill the duties they were originally mandated to perform.

Leave a Reply to Dame BajansCancel reply

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading