While uncertainty currently rules the day, there are still people out there with vision and the fundamental belief that our tourism industry will not only recover, but flourish in times to come.

For most of us, despite having traded though all the previous challenges including 911, SARS and others, the Covid-19 pandemic has been what can only be described as an earth-shattering wake-up call, severely questioning how we do business in the months or years to come.

Our own position is a classic case in point, having recently sold our small hotel, which hopefully sends a tiny beacon of hope that some return to normality may be in sight. To pretend this prolonged sales process was easy would be grossly misleading. It has taken an extraordinary amount of patience, compromise and understanding on both sides.

Are there lessons to be learnt from our personal experience, that may help others in a similar situation or those considering investment in our tourism sector generally, whether at a micro or macro level?

I believe YES, in a number of ways.

The first stumbling blocks are clearly the banks. Most of us can fully understand their reticence to provide loans and the circumstances that has led to this current entrenched position. It is abundantly obvious the need to ‘shop-around’, as the levels of caution vary enormously, depending on either the policies of the individual bank or key decision making personalities involved.

As an aspiring entrepreneur spanning over five decades, if I had accumulated $10 for every financial official who told me that the banks are not in the risk business, probably retirement could have been achieved sometime ago.

People of my generation saw the changes coming a long time ago.  For me, it was when one of Britain’s largest banks, Barclays, took the decision to retire all their branch managers aged over 50 years. It seemed to defy any obvious logic.
At 50, or close to that age, the individual manager has acquired an invaluable local knowledge of the area his or her branch was located, the business movers and shakers, their track record and probable ability to repay any loans.
It was an early sign that things were never going to be the same again in the financial world and that what we had accepted as true ‘customer service’ had been lost, perhaps forever.

Next is our local legal fraternity. Competition, driven by efficiency, attention to detail, the ability to act in a timely manner and accountability has not yet universally arrived on Barbados, with perhaps a few notable exceptions.

And thirdly, but perhaps the single biggest obstacle to even the most ardent investor are the multitude of Government departments that you are forced to deal with.  Persistent unanswered voice and emails and in the unlikely event that you can finally establish any form of human interaction, repeated run-arounds and lack of co-operation to achieve simple goals, except in the rarest cases.

Conversely, in our personal experience we encountered one or two outstandingly helpful individuals, but sadly not in any position of authority.

While there have been some bureaucratic improvements during the last four years, a great deal more could and has to be done to make Barbados a more investment friendly country, especially when the nation’s economic recovery depends on it.

In our technological world, every tool exists to make this possible, but it is frightening that ‘we’ seem to be incapable of implementing the fiscal environment that other countries take for granted and benefit from accordingly.

62 responses to “Adrian Loveridge Column – In Times to Come”


  1. @ David

    I think Critical Analyzer on November 8, 2020 12:37 PM does full justice to your query. I don’t think I would have said it as eloquently as they did.
    Until we are rid of the mentality which was described tin their response, your questions and questions like yours will always be posed, and almost rhetorically too!


  2. The Watcher,

    Seems to me you do much more than watch.

    You actually see.


  3. @The Watcher

    Glad that you see where the root issue is located.


  4. @ The Watcher November 8, 2020 9:27 AM
    “Offer a rebate on the cost of a new EV with a trade in program for “old beaters” equivalent to the age of that old car up to 30 years. So as an example, if I own a 15 year old car, I can get a 15% discount towards the purchase cost of a new EV. I believe that this is significant in a few ways. First, the fuel import bill goes down. The cost of parts also gets reduced. We start to reduce automotive garbage generated as a result of having to dispose old car parts and sometimes, old cars themselves. Finally, but probably of the greatest importance, we reduce pollution and other dangerous by product gases of combustion.”
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    All your proposals re the fast-tracking of the country’s Alternative Energy programme are sound and ought to be implemented if the government is to meet its ambitious goal of a Carbon-Neutral economy by 2030.

    However, you ought to be sufficiently sensitized to the fiscal and social ramifications of your proposal re the widespread replacement of ICE vehicles with EV-powered vehicles.

    Where would the Treasury find a replacement milch cow to make up for the massive loss in tax revenues currently generated by the sale of fuels for motor vehicles in order to continue powering the Bajan welfare state?

    Like the pending disappearance of the ‘cashiers’ at the supermarket check-outs are you foreseeing the disappearance of the gas (petrol) stations in the present incarnation where there would be no need for delivery people and ‘gas-pumping’ attendants?

    What would happen to those seeking those ‘low-skill’ job opportunities other than joining the ranks in the army of the ‘Voluntary Idle’ sitting on the fast expanding blocks in increasingly socially -depressed communities?

    Where would the ‘recommended’ 80,000 nouveaux arrivants find jobs if those so-called low-skill immigrant-type jobs disappear?

    In the traditional professions which, too, are on the cusp of being dominated and controlled by automation and AI?


  5. @ Miller November 8, 2020 7:24 PM

    These are all good questions that you are asking. Let me preface by saying to you that we (Barbadians) have to stop this practice of trying to find a solution to a problem by iterating ever possibly scenario and having the answer to the question that arises from each scenario.
    That mindset tends to lock us up in fear and paralyzes any moves that we will possibly make when we hit a cognitive roadblock on our hypothetical journey.
    Now, on to our story!

    “However, you ought to be sufficiently sensitized to the fiscal and social ramifications of your proposal re the widespread replacement of ICE vehicles with EV-powered vehicles”
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    I am. Very much so. This proposal has the potential of causing some “Social Dislocation” in some segments of our population. Of that I am well aware. So to be a bit more expansive here, it means less gas stations, in the next decade (Possibly). Don’t think that everyone is going to convert their car to an EV though. That will take some time in of itself. Less Gas Stations means less attendants, but EV use will open up a new market in of itself. I will expand on this idea in a later response.

    “Where would the Treasury find a replacement milk cow to make up for the massive loss in tax revenues currently generated by the sale of fuels for motor vehicles in order to continue powering the Bajan welfare state?”
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    I hate this question only because it is a total rip off that a previous PM imposed on this country with 200+ % duties levied on vehicle importation like we had some wonderful Mass Transit system to protect. The government since then has relied heavily on the revenue created by this rip-off tax and are quite frankly “dumpsy!” If our economy tanks and vehicle sales slump to single-digit numbers, what will you tax then? Grow a brain and then use it! I cannot feel for this sort of wanton stupidity. This is just like the reliance on Tourism. Be resilient.
    Rant done!
    I will tell you where it comes from. As ICE moves off the road, especially those that are less efficient based on their age, our fuel import bill shrinks. That means that less foreign exchange leaves the island, and hence there is more money in the Treasury. So by implementing that move, our cost savings are significant enough to offset the Pirate duty imposed on vehicle importation. And let me say here and now, I have been researching why an EV is attracting duty at the same rate as an ICE as it has no ENGINE and there is no equivalent scale or comparative mechanism to assess the output of the electric motor to that of the CC rating of an ICE. Recall that the cc capacity is what we use as a benchmark to determine duty assessed. So we are again ripping off people because we are just too “dumpsy to do better.

    “Like the pending disappearance of the ‘cashiers’ at the supermarket check-outs are you foreseeing the disappearance of the gas (petrol) stations in the present incarnation where there would be no need for delivery people and ‘gas-pumping’ attendants?”
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Yes, I do see the change that it will bring. As I was touching on it earlier, those changes will be slowly phased in as more EV’s appear, but gas stations will probably need at least a decade and a half before starting to phase themselves out which I don’t see happening in less than two or three decades. That said, persons will find alternative employment as it relates to EV’s. These vehicles need more in the way of a Programmer and less in the way of a mechanic to maintain and keep them optimally running. Additionally, they need a new breed of Automotive Electrician than do ICE vehicles so right there I see the need for two new or modified professions with their ( EV) acceptance and growing popularity. Let’s not forget Hybrids, both Plug-in and non-plug in. They will need specialists to maintain and keep them running also and probably a more knowledgeable specialist than the EV because they are a combination of an EV and ICE all under one shell.
    So I have no fear that as the lady who pumps your gas and mine now moves out of that job in the next decade or decade and a half, her son or daughter will attend SJPI or another institution and become proficient and competent in the maintenance and repair of Hybrids or EV’s. Welfare may just have to come to an end in the new economy!

    “What would happen to those seeking those ‘low-skill’ job opportunities other than joining the ranks in the army of the ‘Voluntary Idle’ sitting on the fast expanding blocks in increasingly socially -depressed communities?”
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    This is a question for those people. I don’t think that we have to sit and provide answers to all social issues especially those that persons impose on themselves. You see that term that you used,” The Voluntary Idle” I can tell you what they can do all like now.
    Nuff bush bout de place want cutting down!
    Nuff drains want de-clogging so dat flooding is reduced!
    Nuff potholes want patching properly!
    I can see lots of employment for them and it’s Low skilled as you specified. It’s also “Under-Achiever friendly” and No Ambition Aligned! So it’s just perfect for those who will seek to want to do nothing except ask for and expect handouts. EV’s present New Possibilities like Alt-Energy does. One of those is maintenance. If we have 1/3 or even 2/3 of Barbados’ roofs covered in Solar Panels, they have to be cleaned to maintain maximum output. They are not going to clean themselves, so someone with a pressure washer, and a 4 week course that will be put on by SJPI or other such institution will help to create opportunities and potential markets

    “Where would the ‘recommended’ 80,000 nouveaux arrivants find jobs if those so-called low-skill immigrant-type jobs disappear?”
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    I do not know if I got this one fully. It seems to be point to the plan to import persons here because some person or people postulate that our population is too small. If that is indeed where this question is going, I will respond rather fiery as I believe that we do not need to expand an Under-Class, but rather reduce it. If we are indeed going to bring people here, my criteria would be simple. You have at minimum 5 CXC’s at passing grades of 1 and 2. When you come you engage in getting trained up either online or at our local University or other such institutions to the Bachelors Degree Level
    If you do not have 5 CXC’s and can prove competency in a specific area, you go through an assessment from the BAC of similar institution and are then asked to train up like the other previously described group at our local institutions or on-line to a level equivalent to the Associates Degree.
    Don’t bring Ms. Myrie styled people here to sell “poke” and then talk shyte about Barbados is poor and you saw so much Zinc Fences where you lived.
    You lived in a Ghetto because you were a Ghetto rat and had no skills other than “Twerking”. So did you expect to live in Fort George Heights or Millennium Heights with that skill set? Stay your collective asses where you are and don’t come here. That “Informal Services Sector” as I like to refeer to it as, bleeds millions of dollars out of Barbados yearly and it’s not taxed or regulated. We do not need to include these persons in our new plans.
    Let’s start out eliminating the underclass from the pool or potential importees so we can avoid useless litigation and parasitic behavior that bringing these insects here can result in.
    I may sound like Trump, but its pointless thinking it, knowing its dangers and not voicing it. So just don’t encourage it!

    “In the traditional professions which, too, are on the cusp of being dominated and controlled by automation and AI?”
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    I didn’t catch you here. This sounds like a thought that turned into a question but wasn’t quite completed. However, yes, we are going the way of AI (which we already have in a slightly different form) and Automation. But Humans drive machines, not the other way around and I don’t see that changing just like that. That said, we have to take the reins and control our own destiny.
    We can ensure that technology is sufficiently regulated and controlled in law that it doesn’t get used to create more problems than it is supposed to solve. Humans will always abuse power, but if the correct legislative structures are in place to discourage this, I am all for the technology being used.
    It is therefore time to start moving forward, with a unified effort that engages all and eliminates none!


  6. The hole in the analysis here is that BL&P will have to comment to significantly accepting ‘intermittent energy’ in their power distribution not so? Energy efficient cars have to be charged from electricity. Can you say that a significant number of charging ports are powered by alternative energy? The blogmaster is willing to learn therefore patience is required.

    >


  7. I believe that the term “intermittent” tends to cast a shadow, a veil of sorts on the energy source. It suggests that the source is not reliable or dependable. I therefore like the term Augmented as opposed to Intermittent.
    Give it some thought.
    As I had indicated in an earlier piece, I believe that when we have days of low sunlight, BL&P will generate more to meet with demand. Additionally, in our quest to feed the grid with whatever percentage of AE power we choose to meet as our target, Solar will not be the only power source. So even in days of low sunlight, there will be alternative power coming from wind, or even wave action.
    As for the matter which you raised related to charging ports, AC power doesn’t differentiate in the manner you envisage.
    Think to having three water sources all culminating into one big pipe. Or better yet, think of an inland lake fed both by a stream and the sea at high tide.
    When you sample the water in that lake, you cannot differentiate how much is salt water or fresh water. That is because water is water is water and when you mix various sources, you get mixed water. It would require a chemical analysis to determine how much of that water is fresh as opposed to salt by volume.
    Now, expand that analogy to the same lake and take away the sea, but feed the lake with 10 different fresh water streams. Now you have absolutely no real way of knowing when you analyze the water, which portion of that lake is related to which stream. Its all just water.
    What PV Installations must comply with in Barbados, will guarantee that when the power is pushed back onto the grid, it meets some standard that ensures it is not differentiable from power generated at Seawell or the Spring Garden Plant.Hence, when I install a row of PV Chargers at Kensington Oval for instance, the power which flows to them is not power that I can say came from the PV Plant in Lakes Folly or from Spring Garden.
    In essence, electricity is not routable in that manner that allows you to define on a grid which power source you are tapping into. Well at least if is not a Smart Grid and that is another conversation all in itself.
    Hopefully that lends some additional clarity to your thoughts.


  8. Thanks for your pellucid intervention. Will likely use it in a separate blog.


  9. @ The Watcher November 9, 2020 3:15 PM
    “As I had indicated in an earlier piece, I believe that when we have days of low sunlight, BL&P will generate more to meet with demand. Additionally, in our quest to feed the grid with whatever percentage of AE power we choose to meet as our target, Solar will not be the only power source. So even in days of low sunlight, there will be alternative power coming from wind, or even wave action.”
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    You ought to expatiate a bit on the future role of the fossil-fuel based generating plant at Spring Garden (SG).

    That plant is more than just a ‘slave’ but, also, an integral part of the whole electricity supply system in Bim.

    Therefore, there must be some guaranteed level of electricity output to justify its operational efficiency and its economic existence/breakeven point; especially in a relatively static (some might argue, declining) market.

    Wouldn’t increases in electricity production from other sources (additional solar/wind/etc to be fed into the national grid) reduce the amount of electricity to be supplied by the SG plant thereby ‘generating’ probable mismatches in demand and supply and the plant’s long-term profitability given its current ‘foreign’ ownership?

    Just asking for enlightenment!


  10. I am somehow lost here.
    It seems like we are asking for justifications on keeping fossil fuel and the BL&P in its current form and not thinking of the way forward, and executing that way.
    So I will ask, how will the target of 100% renewable Energy be met by 2030?
    I mean. outside of the fact that it is probably nothing more than a pipe dream, will that target be met by worrying about how the plant at SG or Seawell will be used as we integrate more and more Alternative energy sources onto the grid?
    I don’t believe that any more explanation is necessary at all. We can keep fossil fuels, keep the status quo, keep ICE’s and keep Tourism. Simple.
    But just to expatiate a bit, let me deal with some of what you said or asked:
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    That plant is more than just a ‘slave’ but, also, an integral part of the whole electricity supply system in Bim.

    Yes it is. And so what? As we march towards more and more AE on the grid, that plant becomes less and less important and integral to us cumulatively.
    So I guess without it, BIM has no value electricity wise?
    If we continued to hold onto the notion of the horse and buggy, we wouldn’t have Electric Vehicles today now would we?
    Look, if you are forwarding the notion that its so needed that we cannot eventually let it go, then just say so.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Therefore, there must be some guaranteed level of electricity output to justify its operational efficiency and its economic existence/breakeven point; especially in a relatively static (some might argue, declining) market.

    Do you work for BL&P or one of its subsidiaries? Because this is bewildering at best. I do not need to justify it in any measure. That is a problem for that company. if they cannot be resilient, then they probably should not be in business. This is why the so called “third World ” is always falling prey to white domination and rule. People are too afraid to launch out and leave the useless old, tired ways behind.
    If I can in a day generate more output than I need, and that plant only comes on line at night, do you think that is enough justification for retaining it? Or should we abandon any gains made in AE so far and just shut it all down ? So you continue to find all sorts of ways to retard progress so that the status quo can be maintained and those who can have can always have, while the 90% of those who live from paycheck to paycheck can never progress. That seems like a reasonable model to you? Then just say so and lets address that. But the problem you seem to identify certainly isn’t mine, and I doubt that it is yours and quite frankly, it doesn’t exists!
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Wouldn’t increases in electricity production from other sources (additional solar/wind/etc to be fed into the national grid) reduce the amount of electricity to be supplied by the SG plant thereby ‘generating’ probable mismatches in demand and supply and the plant’s long-term profitability given its current ‘foreign’ ownership?

    Let me break this in two and deal with the second part about foreign ownership first.
    When we can GUARANTEE people profits , especially white people who are nothing more than greed-mongers, I find that idea socially, financially and morally repugnant!
    You invest in business and run that business in a manner that it is profitable. You cant expect that I guarantee you a certain profit level at my own peril. It would never stop. So I could care less about the plant’s long term profitability and let me say this too, If you are a monopoly and cant be profitable, you are plain DUMPSY and need to be removed from any business! Simple!

    If in a technology driven world, with A.I, Predictive Analytics, Big Data and all of these new tools, if I am have generating mis-matches, then I believe that the plant should be shut down. We have way too many tools in our arsenal today to even use that as an excuse as to why the corner store just up your street ran out of Tuna especially with the PoS system that they use at checkout. It simply cant be excused. We know to the minute over a 24 hour period how much energy is generated and consumed across the length and breadth of Barbados. Your electricity bill can point out down to the kWh how much energy you consume over a 31-day period and somehow we are going to have mis-matches all of a sudden. I just beg to differ, but if you get offered that line as a reason to keep AE off the grid, take it and carry it to the bank. interest rates there are now <1% so you are making splendid headway towards your own personal progress.
    When Cable and Wireless were told about doing per-second billing, they proudly proclaimed that it could not be done. It was just impossible. Then Digicel came and all of a sudden, they wanted to be first to market with it.
    The only mismatch in my mind here is the (BL&P == BARBADOS) mismatch.

    Progress will not fall into our laps, or stick on our backs like a superglue pasted Velcro suit. We have to work for it, or it will not happen.
    We can ask for all of the explanation possible or try to rebutt any idea that makes us uncomfortable, but in the end, we will lag and fall further behind while persons await explanations and justifications.
    Enlightenment comes from doing. Enlightenment comes from taking the plunge into new areas where calculated risks have been made. It doesn’t come in great Bajan debates and excessively long dialogues with no clearly defined output or action items.
    I hope that what little I have said previously can serve as the basis of you launching out to find the enlightenment you seek, but after all that i have said, if there was no enlightenment at all, then I do not have the ability of capacity to deliver it to you. So I will have to apologize and say that I cannot help you on this one.


  11. @ The Watcher November 9, 2020 10:49 PM

    The miller has no skin in this AE game or is presenting a case in favour of Emera to justify its current monopolistic position as enshrined in law.

    What is being suggested is that both sides of the equation should be examined to shine light on the full practicalities of your proposals.

    The question still left to be answered is who or what, in Barbados, is putting stumbling blocks in the way to promote and implement your proposals to save the Bajan economy from stagnation?

    The political class serving the interests of the current business arrangements (including ownership) or the economic and fiscal realities on the ground?

    But clearly not the miller in his quest for enlightenment along the Tesla Edison Latimer highway where he can see the day when ICE-powered vehicles would go the way of the horse-drawn buggy and power generating stations like the BLP Spring Garden plant the way of the old chimney stacks.


  12. @ Miller November 10, 2020 7:07 AM

    Please do not see these proposals ad “my” proposals that government is failing on implementing or even start examining. I have never officially presented these ideas to any government at any time. In addition, I believe that by making them publicly available, they can be modified ( hopefully for the better) and shared across our 166 Sq Mi border so that every Barbadian with some interest in these can weigh in on. Hopefully, a consensus will be reached that implements the best elements of them if not implements them holistically, but that is only my wish.

    To answer your unanswered question, I will start by saying that I do not know what benefits we collectively derive from having certain information in our hands and not driving for change.It just seems to be to have a talking point around a bottle of E.S.A.Field or other such social beverage.
    The main culprits to my mind in the slow uptake of Alt-E or those who erect stumbling blocks in the way of its adoption in this country are the Political Class. Many businesses are simply now “washing” their roof space with solar panels so much so that if you are ever able to get a birds eye view of Warrens Industrial Estates, it almost looks like every major roof with the excepting on Simpson Motors has this new form of power generation implemented.
    This is not to say that they will or wont do it, it is to say that they may be late to the game, but their revenues comparatively placed next to all the other Warrens based businesses that have done so thus far, they may not see a business case for it at all. I really don’t know.

    Back to the political class. We don’t do enough investigations here to ferret out who owns what, has interest in what , or is silent partners in what, so we miss many major decisions that are made and the underlying reason for them. We need to ask a lot more “uncomfortable” question of the persons that we put in power here whether they like it or not.
    We wont get this farce that is thrown about related to “Integrity Legislation” and the Declaration of Assets anytime soon. That is the political class’s own secret weapon that they use to hide their gains, Ill gotten or otherwise. So its up to us to go digging and use technology aggressively to uncover wrong doing.

    Ask yourself the question why we cant have Solar lights along H-way 2A? With the sun beating down daily, why do we need BL&P to provide lighting to streets and neighborhoods?
    Why cant we have Solar Markers to delineate the edges of the roads. Lets say we have red markers at the edges, Yellow markers in the middle to define the center-line of the road, White to show turning lanes and the list continues. Blue for major stops and what have you! We can have a robust street marking program that seeks to make the darkest country roads visibly marked for night time use. And quite easily so too.if we took ten small solar companies, owned by us, and gave them contracts to erect, install and maintain solar markers and lights , held them to a standard that defined where they can source these items from, acceptable failure rates and other stringent requirements, we could start to move money through this economy again and energize small business. In three to five years at that rate of growth, we could possibly replace 30% of the islands streetlights and make our dark roads more visible and safer.

    But its us to US to agitate for these improvements and not let politicians tell us what THEY believe is worth improving.
    So, to answer your question regarding who is putting stumbling blocks in our way, I’d say that we all are while waiting for the magical messiah to appear and save us from all that ails Barbados.

Leave a Reply to The WatcherCancel reply

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading