Submitted by Ironside

There is going to be a by-election in St. George North and some parties have already announced their candidates. I will not waste time speculating about the reasons – real or imagined- why the sitting MP Glyne Clarke has resigned from parliament and is taking up a diplomatic post in Canada. That is for the gossip posse.

What is important is that this by-election has come at a time when the country is at the lowest ever in its economic performance and arguably at its lowest moral ebb. Politically, the country is experiencing a rise in de facto totalitarianism, a trend being reflected around the world and led by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party).  

Coming just over two years after the main election in 2018, the electioneering engines should not require too much of a warm up, especially in this weather! The core question is: will it be an acid test for the government or merely some quinine for covid-19?

I will leave the bulk of the statistical political punditry to the other bloggers who may more be skilled at the enterprise of analyzing historical voting patterns and the like.  Interested readers can now make use of the site Caribbean Elections Website to fuel their punditry and speculations.

What I want to do, as succinctly as possible, is to state a few imperatives/hypotheses about the by-election.

THE RULING PARTY CANNOT AFFORD TO LOSE THIS BY-ELECTION.  If it does it will confirm how we “feel”, namely, that the populace is no longer enamoured with the BLP and its leader what with the serial malfeasances it has committed over the last two years. If it wins, the pundits will put it down to hard core support in the constituency.

Your guess is as good as mine, though, as to whether the BLP is committing political suicide by running BWU union boss, Toni Moore.  I know the BU historians will tell us about the union leaders who have run for political office over the years so I am looking forward to that rehash and the punditry that will follow.  My rough estimate is that about 70% – 75% of Nationnews Facebook comments cast Ms. Moore’s selection negatively. One commentator bluntly hoped she would lose.  But I concede that that is a small and perhaps irrelevant sample.  

THE PDP CANNOT AFFORD NOT TO FIELD A CANDIDATE IN THIS BY-ELECTION.  I have been following their Facebook communications and all other things considered, they have been doing a fairly decent job of dissecting the issues even for a small, neophyte opposition. So, not to field a candidate in the by-election would send a message that they are still not quite ready.

THE DLP CAN BE EXPECTED TO FIELD A CANDIDATE. After all, it has been predicting by-elections in two constituencies (Indar Weir’s and Trevor Prescod’s) for more than a year!  Let’s see what they come up with! Again I leave my fellow bloggers to speculate…if they have time!

THE UPP MUST SHOW THAT IT HAS NOT LOST HOPE. It has fielded a candidate and we shall see how that plays out.  All things considered, it gave a fairly good account of itself in 2018 election. What I “worry” about is their pedestrian and non-charismatic leadership.

GRENVILLE PHILLIPS [A.K.A SOLUTIONS BARBADOS] HAS ENTERED THE FRAY.  Best of luck and more power to the Treasury!

Moving on smartly! What about issues to be raised in this by-election?

There are many hot, topical issues to inspire debate and conspire about: Covid-19, union betrayal, same sex unions, homosexual marriages, tourism, crime, BEST, neglect of the constituency, the push for republic status for Barbados and the “Thrown” Speech in general. The more enlightened and skilful party (parties) will throw in the Chinese influence in Barbados and the Caribbean.  Just remember I did say “enlightened”!

All in all, I am looking forward to political theatre at its BEST!

274 responses to “Phartford Files: St. George By-Election: Acid Test or Tonic Water?”


  1. @Greene

    It will be up to Reifer to offer a commanding and compelling message on the platform. Toni Moore has the edge in this department.


  2. what is Moore’s commanding and compelling platform message? i dont know Moore has any edge in that regard but she has an advantage from a historical point of view- it has been a BLP seat for 26 years. the Reifer name travels well in that part of St George and Floyd from all accounts is a personable chap. going to be a v interesting campaign


  3. Yes, David, Verla and the DEMS’ decision may have been a wise one.

    But, their strategy must not be dependent on their candidate’s popularity and a perceived growing unpopularity of the BLP alone.

    Mobilising the DLP faithful and voters who have become disenchanted with Mottley’s performance, to rally around Reifer within 90 days (or less), will be a test of Verla’s ‘political acumen.’


  4. @Greene

    Don’t be linear. Whether we agree or not Moore starts with the advantage. We wish Reifer well, it is good to see a fresh face.

    >


  5. you have gone back to the word salad David. none of what you say departs from what i contended. so what gives?


  6. @Greene

    Toni Moore was introduced. She delivered a decent message about her desire to promote the labour cause from the walls of government bla bla. Follow her predecessors…it is Reifers turn.

  7. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    Correct @Artax, re “‘Popularity’ worked for the BEES with ‘Sweet Boy’ Leroy Sisnett in St. Michael North East and failed for the DEES when “hard -hitting calypsonian,” the ‘Mighty Gabby’ ‘ran’ against ‘Billie’ Miller in the City.”

    But beyond very strong ‘wishful thinking’ was Gaby really expected to best Billie … Sweet Boy was part of a Bee’s sweep of that election as I recall and again as memory serves he was swept out next term…

    And of course Owen ran against his deep rooted DLPite family clan and eventually won on a BLP platform…

    All that to say history tells us nothing about this fight of two political novices… so I completely agree with your other assertion that: “Mobilising the DLP faithful and voters who have become disenchanted with Mottley’s performance, to rally around Reifer within 90 days (or less), will be a test of Verla’s ‘political acumen” … With a super emphasis on the disenchantment!


  8. Am I right in saying the by-election date has not yet been announced, yet the BLP is already out campaigning? Is this another deceptive act by the president to give her candidate an advantage?
    Can’t she be straight for just once in her political life? Even if she were to lose it would not affect her command of parliament. It may bruise her ego, but then again that is very important to her. Her world-class credibility may be damaged.


  9. “Whether we agree or not Moore starts with the advantage.”

    @ David BU

    I’ll have to agree with you. One cannot, in all seriousness, deny Moore’s advantage of speaking in public forums, whether it is appealing to union members, negotiating with employers, speaking at conferences hosted by various labour and other organisations or debating in the Senate.

    Reifer can’t come with the usual rhetorical, political diatribe and expect to be taken seriously. Similarly to Grenville II, he and the DEMS should outline what policies they intend to implement for the benefit of the constituency and the island.


  10. Toni Moore’s compelling platform is that she would be fighting for labour and labour issues from parliament. really? that is a winning platform? a labour union representative fighting for labour? man piss in muh pocket. every day you are trying to prove Hal right about bajan intelligence.

    what she ought to outline is how she will do it generally and especially in the face of MAM routing 300 mil to the tourist sector in the hope that they will employ laid off workers. if that is what MAM intended why not give half to the NIS to extend benefits to laid off workers from the tourism sector and half to the said sector just in case tourism picks up they can resume business. other questions surround whether the 300 mil is a loan, what are the obligations of those who get this pay out, and must they employ all the people they laid off or a certain amount?

    and yes Reifer must set out the general election policies of the DLP and his specific policies for SGN


  11. @Greene

    Agree she has to flesh out what she mentioned during the FIRST meeting in Flat Rock. The point, she starts with an advantage given her national profile etc. we will have to see if this is blunted by a swing against the government and a poor platform delivery by Reifer.

    >


  12. @ DPD

    Leroy Sisnett ‘ran’ and won the St. Michael North East seat in the 1976 and 1981 general elections.

    Interestingly, popularity also worked for the DEMS with then popular VOB radio personality, Steve Blackett.

    Based on Ishmael Roett’s record in St. Michael Central, it was also “wishful thinking” Blackett would have beaten Roett’s protégé, Rudy Grant. But, Blackett triumphed…..
    …. and I’m sure you’ll recall there was a ‘swing’ in 2008 as well. He also retained his ‘seat’ in the 2013 elections, at a time when sentiment was growing against Stuart and the DLP.

    We could look at that situation from the perspective that Blackett was just as popular on the radio with callers then, as is Larry Mayers currently. His popularity increased when he moved from radio to reading CBC TV evening news.

    Despite Roett’s record, perhaps Grant was punished by unforgiving DEMS because he was among many young politicians that for one reason or the other, were seduced by Arthur, to join the BLP……… and BEES that probably weren’t sure where his loyalty lay.

    Patrick Gollop was also a very popular radio personality as well. But, I’m not sure if his prospects, if he ‘ran’ for either the DLP or BLP.


  13. If the last paragraph is to be considered, I hope you’re not referring to me.

    If you are, I NEVER mentioned anything about “Moore’s compelling platform would be fighting for labour and labour issues from parliament.”

  14. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @Artax, thank you for the correction re Sweet Boys two terms and not one…

  15. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    … what we can say about our political scene is that ‘any number can play based on prevailing winds’! As you referenced re PG, what makes him less likely to succeed politically than Blackette or a Doug Hoyte or Mayers! What makes one popular insurance agent or lawyer successful politically and another not!

    The formula seems fairly basic: popularity, charm (read that as good looks, a positive commanding image and decent verbal skills) and an appearance of being intelligent or at a minimum success in your life endeavors. Couple that with strong party support and a winner is assured it seems … but alas, NOT always!

    So we can punditry as much as we like but with the variables surrounding this by-election a surprise victory for Reifer though NOT impossible would be a complete shock… because if Georgians ask themselves what his presence in the House offers them now then his election is doomed!


  16. dpD

    “because if Georgians ask themselves what his presence in the House offers them now then his election is doomed!”

    please explain


  17. @ DPD

    I forgot about Doug Hoyte. He was a very popular television personality, rising from reading the CBC TV news to hosting ‘Mornin’ Barbados’ and interviews.

    Yet, he was unsuccessful in his bid to become DLP parliamentarian.

    Another example is ‘Natlee’ Harewood. The amount of ‘support’ she generated, perhaps based on her popularity as a hooker, when she ‘threw her hat in the ring’ to contest the 2018 general elections as an independent candidate for the City, one would have thought she would have received much more than 54 votes.
    The support and suggestions she would have influenced social policy (or something similar) were ‘thrown through the window’ on election day. By that time, the novelty of a hooker ‘running’ for the House had worn off. Seriousness of the situation probably returned when her “Harry does like to eat botsy” videos on social media were considered.

    Coincidentally, I was thinking similarly, re what “if Georgians ask themselves what (Reifer’s) presence in the House offers them now?” You answered that question.

  18. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @Greene, seriously! You are seeking an expantation on why a lone and ‘lowly’ opposition. MP would be considered as being :doomed” to defeat!

    Alright bro… that would need to be done over a gin and tonic … on you!😎

    @Artax, oh lordie yah rough… you are comparing an avowed and vocal ‘escort’ to a number of male media personalities … oh dear… not sure how to ‘wrap’ that one.

    Would just say that 59 votes was a lot… can u imagine husbands explanning to wives or wives to husbands their vote… just jesting!

    On a semi serious note … Natlee was just too open ended verbally for many folks tastes I would suggest… it’s one thing to use your female attributes to earn a living but being so raucous too!

    I gone tho.


  19. dpD,
    strange statement that. I suppose then that the DLP, PdP and Solutions Barbados should give up and hand the seat to BLP becos it would be lonely in opposition.


  20. @Greene

    The third parties will cut votes from the DLP. Here is a good case for the fledgling opposition parties to agree to come together in the interest of increasing the possibility of increasing dissenting position in parliament. Our adversarial system would never permit!


  21. David,

    under which banner do you propose they come together?


  22. @Greene

    The DLP

    >


  23. i dont know. that may cause a problem for the PdP and SB parties which would want to propose a new philosophy and policies apart from that of the DLP

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading