Mounting pressure is being brought by airlines and the United Kingdom travel trade onto the British Government to suspend, lower the rate or eliminate the Air Passenger Duty (APD), often referred to as ‘the highest rate of tax in the world on air passengers’. A statement from the UK Treasury has confirmed that a consultation on aviation tax reform would take place and hinted that APD could be suspended in the autumn budget amid increasing pressure to provide respite for airlines and the wider industry.

According to the Daily Mail, ‘at least 24 Members of Parliament (MP’s), including the chairman of the influential 1922 committee, Sir Graham Brady, are pressing chancellor Rishi Sunak to suspend APD until the end of summer 2021’. A suspension would allow airlines to entice holidaymakers with cheaper fares and save many of the 600 air routes lost as a result of the pandemic. MP Henry Smith, whose constituency includes London’s second airport, Gatwick, stated that ‘if we maintain our levels of air passenger duty, it will become a tax on recovery, as flying is the only viable route for investors and business people to approach and service existing markets’. The UK and Ireland Managing Director of Travel giant TUI, Andrew Flintham, warned ‘that many companies would not survive unless the current blunt approach was changed ‘ adding ‘if we enter the winter season without sensible solutions, the outlook only gets worse’.

Quite frankly, it defies logic, that our policymakers have not seen fit to temporarily reduce or eliminate the not one, but two, departure taxes plus VAT (Value Added Tax) on air tickets, together with removing the various additional tourism taxes and levies imposed before or from October 2018.

Looking at the cost of airfares from the UK to Barbados during this November as an example, where the lowest priced return economy ticket can still be purchased for as little GB Pounds 374. Over half (52 per cent) of that amount is made-up in taxes inflicted by both Governments. The APD element starts at GB Pounds 80 per person and the UK passenger service charge of GB Pounds 40.87. For the Barbados section, what Virgin Atlantic describes as Airport Service Charge of GB Pounds 52.70 plus a further Passenger Service Charge International of GB Pounds 20.70

So it does not take a rocket scientist to figure out what a massive difference a reduction in these add-on opportunist taxes could make in people’s economic ability to travel to our shores. The rationale is endlessly obvious. If you deter potential visitors in the first place by extracting high levels of taxation, then you obviously cannot collect further taxes on their accommodation, car rental, restaurant dining, shopping, activities, attractions, and so on.

While airlines across the globe are grounding hundreds of aircraft, slashing thousands of employees and fighting for their very survival, it seems almost incomprehensible that Governments are still extracting over half the cost of airfares in taxes.

55 responses to “Adrian Loveridge Column – Reduce Travel Related Taxes!”


  1. @ Hal

    From the USA per WONDER.LEGAL:
    “Corporate Bylaws are essentially the “rules” for how a corporation must operate…Most states require these documents at the beginning of the life of a corporation. Articles of Incorporation are often the very first document filed to begin a new corporate business. The Articles must be filed with the state. Shortly thereafter, however, or around the same time, many corporations put together their Corporate Bylaws. Bylaws are the document that underlies the entire operational structure of a corporation…Bylaws cover the major aspects of a corporate business: shareholders, directors, officers, and meeting information…Corporate Bylaws can also be drafted for a non-profit corporation, which contain many of the same provisions except those relating to shareholders”.


  2. LIAT has been bankrupt for DECADES. The taxpayers of the shareholder countries propped it up BIG TIME.

    What caused LIAT to go into liquidation may be found in one word – “POLITICIANS”.

    For DECADES I and other professionals have been telling our “leaders” and the Press that things MUST change at LIAT, but nothing was ever done, the politicians liked things just the way they were.

    Most of Board and Management were politically appointed – incompetent knuckleheads with zero knowledge or experience in aviation anywhere who were Party Faithful or who were owed favours. The managers who were promoted to their own levels of supreme incompetence from within had no other points of reference or experience other than “at LIAT we have always done it this way”.

    Even the last 15 years or so the usually rotating shareholder Chairman wheel seems to have broken off – power-mad Marxist Comrade Fat Ralph held it and steadfastly refused all efforts at change.

    COVID was just the final straw on LIAT’s back that our “leaders” could not ignore — and the pandemic has exposed every company in every industry around the globe that was no longer viable.

    Bear in mind also that LIAT has not published its annual accounts for at least 40 years. This is a PUBLIC TAXPAYER-SUPPORTED REGIONAL CORPORATION that has received HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of US dollars in taxpayer funding, yet not a single politician, Board member or manager thought it fit that those taxpayers should have access to accounts or even to ask questions.

    So, here is my question: How many hundreds of millions of US dollars were siphoned off into private pockets over the decades?

    Final comments: I understand politicians are bewildered that the public perception is that they are all liars and thieves. Should we not expect that political promises made to gain votes should be kept? And at what point does a taxpayer have the right to be outraged at the theft being perpetrated by those they trusted and voted for?

    I also understand that all politicians should not be tarred with the same brush, but when one Party wins an election and then refuses to take legal action against the previous ruling Party who CLEARLY operated like bandits and robbed the Treasury, what is the rationale? Is it that they intend to steal just as much and if they imprison the former lot then they will themselves be imprisoned when they are thrown out?

    Tit for tat is not a viable response to a taxpayer whose pockets are being bled dry year after year, decade after decade.

    LIAT is dead. Long live LIAT.


  3. Present govt cannot lower the taxes levied on the tourism industry
    The tourist are not coming and in order for the industry to survive govt has to collect revenue which most likely would return to the big belly heads to help fill the coffers which they themselves claim is empty
    So saying at a time when the tourist industry is asking govt for funding to do away with the taxes is foolishness
    Maybe after the industry rebounds that call should be made
    In meantime ask what can hoteliers do that can reinvigorate the industry in one of its worst time


  4. Mariposa, you seem to have lost the point. If we cannot restore airlift to reasonable numbers there is absolutely NOTHING the hoteliers can do. Please re-read my comments and then respond.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading