Submitted by Dr. GP

The New Testament uses three different words to describe the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

(i) The commonest is parousia, a word which has come into English as it stands. It is used in Matthew 24:3; Matthew 24:27; Matthew 24:39; 1 Thessalonians 2:9; 1 Thessalonians 3:13; 1 Thessalonians 4:15; 1 Thessalonians 5:23; 2 Thessalonians 2:1; 1 Corinthians 15:23; 1 John 2:28; 2 Peter 1:16; 2 Peter 3:4. In secular Greek this is the ordinary word for someone’s presence or arrival. But it has two other usages, one of which became quite technical. It is used of the invasion of a country by an army and specially it is used of the visit of a king or a governor to a province of his empire. So, then, when this word is used of Jesus, it means that his Second Coming is the final invasion of earth by heaven and the coming of the King to receive the final submission and adoration of his subjects.

(ii) The New Testament also uses the word epiphaneia (Titus 2:13; 2 Timothy 4:1; 2 Thessalonians 2:9). In ordinary Greek this word has two special usages. It is used of the appearance of a god to his worshipper; and it is used of the accession of an emperor to the imperial power of Rome. So, then, when this word is used of Jesus, it means that his Second Coming is God appearing to his people, both to those who are waiting for him and to those who are disregarding him.

(iii) Finally the New Testament uses the word apokalupsis (1 Peter 1:7; 1 Peter 1:13). Apokalupsis in ordinary Greek means an unveiling or a laying bare; and when it is used of Jesus, it means that his Second Coming is the laying bare of the power and glory of God come upon men.

Here, then, we have a series of great pictures. The Second Coming of Jesus is the arrival of the King; it is God appearing to his people and mounting his eternal throne; it is God directing on the world the full blaze of his heavenly glory.

We may now gather up briefly the teaching of the New Testament about the Second Coming and the various uses it makes of the idea.

(i) The New Testament is clear that no man knows the day or the hour when Christ comes again. So secret, in fact, is that time that Jesus himself does not know it; it is known to God alone (Matthew 24:36; Mark 13:32). From this basic fact one thing is clear. Human speculation about the time of the Second Coming is not only useless, it is blasphemous; for surely no man should seek to gain a knowledge which is hidden from Jesus Christ himself and resides only in the mind of God.

(ii) The one thing that the New Testament does say about the Second Coming is that it will be as sudden as the lightning and as unexpected as a thief in the night (Matthew 24:27; Matthew 24:37; Matthew 24:39; 1 Thessalonians 5:2; 2 Peter 3:10). We cannot wait to get ready when it comes; we must be ready for its coming.

So, the New Testament urges certain duties upon men.

(i) They must be for ever on the watch (1 Peter 4:7). They are like servants whose master has gone away and who, not knowing when he will return, must have everything ready for his return, whether it be at morning, at midday, or at evening (Matthew 24:36-51).

(ii) Long delay must not produce despair or forgetfulness (2 Peter 3:4). God does not see time as men do. To him a thousand years are as a watch in the night and even if the years pass on, it does not mean that he has either changed or abandoned his design.

(iii) Men must use the time given them to prepare for the coming of the King. They must be sober (1 Peter 4:7). They must get to themselves holiness (1 Thessalonians 3:13). By the grace of God they must become blameless in body and in spirit (1 Thessalonians 5:23). They must put off the works of darkness and put on the armour of light now that the day is far spent (Romans 13:11-14). Men must use the time given them to make themselves such that they can greet the coming of the King with joy and without shame.

(iv) When that time comes, they must be found in fellowship. Peter uses the thought of the Second Coming to urge men to love and mutual hospitality (1 Peter 4:8-9). Paul commands that all things be done in love — Maran-atha — the Lord is at hand (1 Corinthians 16:14; 1 Corinthians 16:22). He says that our forbearance must be known to all men because the Lord is at hand (Philippians 4:5). The word translated “forbearance” is epieikes which means the spirit that is more ready to offer forgiveness than to demand justice.

The writer to the Hebrews demands mutual help, mutual Christian fellowship, mutual encouragement because the day is coming near (Hebrews 10:24-25). The New Testament is sure that in view of the Coming of Christ we must have our personal relationships right with our fellowmen. The New Testament would urge that no man ought to end a day with an unhealed breach between himself and a fellowman, lest in the night Christ should come.

(v) John uses the Second Coming as a reason for urging men to abide in Christ (1 John 2:28). Surely the best preparation for meeting Christ is to live close to him every day.

Much of the imagery attached to the Second Coming is Jewish, part of the traditional apparatus of the last things in the ancient Jewish mind. There are many things which we are not meant to take literally. But the great truth behind all the temporary pictures of the Second Coming is that this world is not purposeless but going somewhere, that there is one divine far-off event to which the whole creation moves.’

60 responses to “Sweet Sunday Sermon – The Second Coming of Christ”


  1. Donna
    re i THOUGHT THAT THE BIBLE WAS THE SOLE AUTHORITY FOR FAITH AND PRACTICE
    ++++++++++++++++++++

    Nope! That is our starting point. You are sending me in search of my books.

    The Bible
    The traditions of the Church
    Reason
    The current experience of Christians

    BUT DONNA DEAREST, The Bible PRECEDED THE CHURCH—-AT LEAST THE OT DID! AS WELL AS The traditions of the Church & The current experience of Christians.

    THINK ABOUT IT FOR A MINUTE.
    EVEN MARTIN LUTHER BELIEVED AND TAUGHT “SOLO BIBLIO”

    wHEN YOU SAY The traditions of the Church, WHICH TRADITIONS DO YOU MEAN?
    ON WHAT IS TRADITION BASED? TEACHING? DOGMA? REASON?

    IS THAT NOT THE CAUSE FOR THE SEVERAL “DENOMINATIONS”
    DOES NOT EVERY DENOMINATION HAVE ITS OWN TRADITIONS, TEACHING, OR DOGMA AND REASON?

    WOULD IT NOT BE BETTER IF ALL SINCERELY SOUGHT TO FOLLOW THE SACRED CANON OF SCRIPTURE?

    RE PS. You asked Vincent where in the Bible it says that God is a God of diversity. Look at His creation. God is revealed in nature as well. I KNOW THAT I HAVE BEEN WATCHING DOCUMENTARIES FOR YEARS ON BOTH THE MACROSCOPIC AND MICROSCOPIC CREATION.
    That there is evidence of God outside of the Bible is even stated in the Bible at Psalm 19:1……..”the heavens declare the glory of God and and the firmament sheweth his handywork..

    That is not the diversity that I was speaking of. I certainly dont believe in a diversity of Gods

    Now out of these parameters you cite
    The Bible
    The traditions of the Church
    Reason
    The current experience of Christians

    only the Bible is unchanging (I Peter 1:25=> But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.

    When I was an ardent Anglican the 39 articles in the prayer book were the Anglican distinctives, and we studied them prior to “confirmation.”

    More later


  2. There is no second coming of Christ. There was no first coming of Christ.

    It’s OK if you want to spend your eighty years loving a Jewish mason from the eastern Mediterranean two millennia ago.

    Just don’t bother the literate grown-ups with it.


  3. Donna
    HERE BASICALLY IS HOW WE DIFFER

    BAPTIST DISTINCTIVES——-easy to remember using the acronym BAPTISTS.
    Bible – the soul authority for faith and practice

    Autonomy or independence of the local church

    Priesthood of all believers

    T wo offices –
    Pastor
    Deacon

    Individual soul liberty and responsibility

    Separation of Church & State

    Two ordinances
    Believer’s Baptism by immersion
    Lord’s Supper

    Saved, baptized and serving members


  4. Less than 30% of world are Christians (less than 2% are Jewish) but God is creator of all.

    The Bible is a just guide to spirituality in same way Jesus was and is a useful learning tool.

    Reconciling the bible with the bible is a futile time wasting exercise as it the same data being checked against itself.

    GP cannot see the woods from the trees and reviews his bible with traits of OCD.

    Adults need to find and determine their own individual spirituality, values, purpose, direction and relationship with God.

    People are not robots who must conform to what others say.


  5. Jesus did not produce the Bible or the Church, it was done by his followers after his death.
    He was deemed a revolutionary threat and was killed for his ideas and Christianity became a radical underground movement.
    If Jesus developed or established a faith he would probably refine his ideas as works of God are works in progress.
    He taught people gentiles and jews his concepts of God how to channel God and serve God and allow God to become a guide in life.


  6. GP,

    We will never agree on this and most readers have moved on and so it makes very little sense for me to expound on my point. Suffice it to say that our differences will not lead us to opposite poles of the earth.

    555Dubstreet,

    Here it is that I am largely in agreement with you rather than GP. I am glad that you have found the evidence of which I spoke.

    “Reconciling the bible with the bible is a futile time wasting exercise as it the same data being checked against itself.”

    It just would not be accepted to do that in any sphere. The Bible must be tested against something other than itself.

    However there must be systematic study of the Bible and verses should not be extracted and paraded around without regard for context or the meaning will be distorted. GP knows the context. Grenville shows no regard for it. Therefore he will most likely not convey the message that was meant to be conveyed. This has nothing to do with whether or not we believe the message. It is just a matter of applying a systematic method that would be applicable to ANY communication whatsoever. We must take into consideration the context before we can determine if the message is transferable to us.

    If a letter is written specifically to the Philippians in Paul’s time and place, is it relevant or transferable to current Philippians of the Barbadian variety? This is the question that must be answered. Or more specifically which part is transferable and which part applies only to those to whom the letter was addressed?

    This requires systematic method.

    Helen,

    You are entitled to state your non belief. however, we are entitled to state our belief. I have no proof that God exists. You have no proof that he doesn’t. It has nothing to do with being literate. Apparently you do not even know the meaning of that word.

    David, the BLOGMASTER, has afforded GP the space on his blog. That too is his right. You have the right to click or not to click. Nobody forced you to click. But here it is that YOU want to impose YOUR will on GP and the blogmaster. That, I must tell you, is NOT your right. But you do have the right to remain silent if you have nothing sensible to say.


  7. DONNA
    RE GP,

    We will never agree on this and most readers have moved on and so it makes very little sense for me to expound on my point. Suffice it to say that our differences will not lead us to opposite poles of the earth.

    I AM NOT TRYING TO CONVINCE YOU OF ANYTHING
    YOU STATED YOUR FOUR POINT POSITION AND I STATED THE BAPTIST DISTINCTIVES WHICH ARE DERIVED FROM THE BIBLE

    RE “Reconciling the bible with the bible is a futile time wasting exercise as it the same data being checked against itself.”

    It just would not be accepted to do that in any sphere. The Bible must be tested against something other than itself.

    THIS IS NOT AT ALL TRUE BECAUSE ASPECTS OF SCIENCE WHICH IS BASICALLY MAN’S DISCOVERY ARE TESTED AGAINST SCIENCE ALL THE TIME. THIS IS SO IN ALL BRANCHES OF SCIENCE.

    THAT IS HOW ANIMALS AND PLANTS AND MICROBES ARE CLASSIFIED UH LIE

    THIS IS HOW WE HAVE COMPARATIVE ANATOMY AND COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY ETC

    EVERYTHING IN THIS WORLD IS CHECKED AGAINST ITSELF OR WHAT IS PREVIOUSLY KNOWN

    I DONT CARE WHO AGREES WITH ME SINCE I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day. 2 Timothy 1:12


  8. “If a letter is written specifically to the Philippians in Paul’s time and place, is it relevant or transferable to current Philippians of the Barbadian variety? This is the question that must be answered. Or more specifically which part is transferable and which part applies only to those to whom the letter was addressed?”

    Bible was written several centuries ago in underdeveloped places by people with underdeveloped minds who often exaggerated and embellished truths and would reframe or imagine stories any which way they chose.

    Biblical messages have become sayings idioms lessons and phrases in cultural language and adopted in stories and songs and adopted in thoughts of mind that can pop up to explain nuances of everyday life.

    Random Phrases can resonate with certain people in certain times in certain situations, maybe God or Spirit is guiding the thoughts.

    People follow their own path in life and will make decisions when they deem it is right time to do so.


  9. @ GP February 12, 2020 9:33 AM
    “THIS IS NOT AT ALL TRUE BECAUSE ASPECTS OF SCIENCE WHICH IS BASICALLY MAN’S DISCOVERY ARE TESTED AGAINST SCIENCE ALL THE TIME. THIS IS SO IN ALL BRANCHES OF SCIENCE.
    THAT IS HOW ANIMALS AND PLANTS AND MICROBES ARE CLASSIFIED UH LIE
    THIS IS HOW WE HAVE COMPARATIVE ANATOMY AND COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY ETC
    EVERYTHING IN THIS WORLD IS CHECKED AGAINST ITSELF OR WHAT IS PREVIOUSLY KNOWN”
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Yet you still ‘believe’ that your Yahweh made the Universe in 6 days and he made two lights in the sky; one to rule the day and the other the night.

    As far as you are concerned the Sun still revolves around the Earth.

    If you truly believe that Yahweh made the universe then you ought to open your mind to the strong possibility that his ‘defective’ earthlings might just not be his favourite creatures.

    When the sons of God ‘mix with’ (“come in unto”) the daughters of men there could be wedding bells in heaven and baby nappies to change.

    Now that idea ought to keep your scientific juices flowing!


  10. “If you truly believe that Yahweh made the universe then you ought to open your mind to the strong possibility that his ‘defective’ earthlings might just not be his favourite creatures.”

    Was Jesus an alien who came on a spaceship.
    (A school of thought / theiry believes some such to explain Easter Island and other “alien” ruins found)

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading